Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017 Aug;64(4):867–877. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.03.005

The Global State of Helminth Control and Elimination in Children

Jill E Weatherhead a,b,*, Peter J Hotez a,b,c,d, Rojelio Mejia a,b,*
PMCID: PMC6082161  NIHMSID: NIHMS937653  PMID: 28734515

INTRODUCTION

Helminth infections, including hookworm (Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duedenale), roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), and whipworm (Trichuris trichiura), collectively known as intestinal (or soil) transmitted helminths, as well as schistosomiasis, are among the most common infections found in children worldwide, infecting almost 2 billion people (Table 1).1,2 Although intestinal helminth infections and schistosomiasis are not the only major parasites affecting children, their overwhelming numbers in terms of pediatric cases globally requires special attention. New estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 indicate that together these helminth infections resulted in more than 6 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), a number roughly equivalent to the DALYs caused by measles, Haemophilus influenzae type B meningitis, or other better-known pediatric conditions.2 However, even these DALY estimates may represent “low-ball” figures based on revised estimates of more than 4 million DALYs from hookworm alone.3 Thus, although intestinal helminth infections are not leading causes of death,4 they are profoundly important causes of childhood disability and even future economic disrupters, with calculated adverse effects on future wage earning. Overwhelmingly, these worms affect children living in extreme poverty, particularly those living in rural communities or urban communities that lack adequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH).5 Contrary to previous assumptions, helminths and other neglected tropical diseases are not restricted exclusively to resource-limited countries. For some worm infections, there is a significant burden of disease found in poor communities living in countries with robust economies, including areas of the United States.6

Table 1.

Prevalence and impact of major helminth infections, soil-transmitted helminths, and schistosomiasis, globally

Major Human
Species
Estimated
Prevalence
(Cases)
DALYs
(Millions)
Deaths References
Roundworm (Ascariasis) Ascaris lumbricoides 761.9 million 1.075 2700 2,4,7
Whipworm (Trichuriasis) T trichiura 463.7 million 0.653 None specified 2,4,7
Hookworm N americanus and Ancylostoma sp 428.2 million 1.758 None specified 2,4,7
Blood Fluke (Schistosomiasis) S haematobium, S mansoni 252.3 million 2.613 4400 2,4,7
Total >1.9 billion 6.096 7100

The most common and most profound disabilities resulting from each of the major intestinal helminth infections and schistosomiasis are shown in Table 2. Children acquire their primary infection as they begin interacting with the environment during their preschool years and reach maximum worm burden for roundworm and whipworm (transmission via oral ingestion of embryonated eggs) by school age, whereas for hookworm and schistosomiasis (transmission via direct percutaneous invasion of larvae) in adolescence or young adulthood.8,9 Overall, children infected with intestinal helminths and/or schistosomiasis often suffer from restrictions in cognitive development, impairment in memory, and reduced education attendance and performance.5,9,10 These deficits lead to impaired school achievement.9,11 Preschool- and school-aged children are at particular risk of poor long-term outcomes because they harbor the greatest burden of worms.5 Children infected with roundworm are at increased risk of abdominal pain, abdominal distention, vitamin A deficiency, wheezing, and asthma, whereas children with whipworm may have colitis and other forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or Trichuris dysentery syndrome.9 These findings go against the commonly held, but erroneous, belief that somehow worms protect children from asthma or IBD.12 Children with hookworm experience iron-deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia, in addition to intestinal protein losses.3 Young adults are also at risk of significant morbidity secondary to helminths. In resource-poor areas, women of reproductive age or those that are pregnant are at high risk of hookworm-induced iron-deficiency anemia.5,13 In Africa and elsewhere, hookworm-induced anemia is also exacerbated by malaria coinfections.14 Similarly, schistosomiasis is a major cause of chronic pediatric inflammation and anemia.15 In addition, schistosomiasis caused by Schistosoma haematobium causes lesions in the female genital tract that result in a 2.9-to 4-fold increase in HIV transmission and increased risk of progress to AIDS.13 Schistosomiasis has also been linked to female infertility and the development of noncommunicable diseases such as cancer.1618 Because these infections commonly have subclinical symptoms in children and young adults, the evidence of morbidity may not become apparent until adulthood, leading to limitations in adult workforce capability and wage potential, creating a cycle of poverty within the community.1 Beyond poverty, pediatric helminth infections can exhibit a devastating social impact within communities.19

Table 2.

Transmission, symptoms, and treatment strategies for soil transmitted helminths in children

Mode of
Transmission
Major Symptoms Treatment References
Hookworm Direct percutaneous invasion of larvae in contaminated soil Growth stunting, cognitive restriction, iron deficiency anemia, and protein losses Albendazole 400 mg once or mebendazole 100 mg bid × 3 d 8,9,20
Roundworm Oral ingestion of eggs in contaminated soil Growth stunting, cognitive restriction, vitamin A malabsorption, intestinal obstruction, asthma Albendazole 400 mg once or mebendazole 100 mg bid × 3 d 8,9,20
Whipworm Oral ingestion of eggs in contaminated soil Growth stunting, cognitive restriction, trichuris colitis, trichuris dysentery syndrome Albendazole 400 mg po for 3–7 d or mebendazole 100 mg bid for 3–7 d 8,9,20
Schistosomiasis Direct percutaneous invasion of larvae in fresh water Growth stunting, cognitive restriction, bladder cancer, liver fibrosis, hematuria, renal failure, female genital schistosomiasis Praziquantel 20 mg/kg twice a day for 1 d 8,9,20

Previously, in the United States and other wealthy nations, helminth infections were thought to be isolated to immigrant communities, refugees, and adoptees from endemic regions. In refugees settling in North America, the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis has been documented as high as 86%.21 However, with the expansion of global networking and international travel and a high prevalence of worms in children living in poverty within wealthy countries, the pediatric clinician practicing within North America and Europe must be increasingly aware of the impact of worm infections in children. Two pediatric populations need to be considered. First, children and young adults with appropriate epidemiologic risk factors and geographic origins from Africa, Asia, and Latin America who present with acute symptoms, such as abdominal distention, abdominal pain, and wheezing, as well as more chronic symptoms, such as asthma, colitis, HIV, and bladder cancer, should be evaluated for helminth infections. Second, helminth infection transmission may be more common in North America and Europe than previously thought.6 For example, toxocariasis, a zoonotic helminth infection from dogs, is widespread in the Southern United States and Eastern Europe,2224 whereas the intestinal helminth infections highlighted above may still occur in the Southern United States and parts of Europe,24,25 and schistosomiasis transmission was recently documented in Corsica.26

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

The diagnosis of helminths has traditionally been based on serologic evaluation for schistosomiasis or visualization of eggs, in stool for intestinal helminth and intestinal schistosomiasis (Schistosoma mansoni or Schistosoma japonicum), or in urine for urogenital schistosomiasis (S haematobium), using microscopy. The subjective declaration of eggs and/or larvae can be a fickle and arduous task that suffers from laborious preparation, the need for skilled microscopists, with sensitivities that range from 50% to 85%.27 Modern molecular techniques have revolutionized helminth diagnoses with greatly improved detection rates and 10-fold increases in detection of 2 or more parasitic infections (polyparasitism).28,29 By using multiparallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction with a stool bead beating DNA extraction method to reduce the cost, the assay can be used in a capacity-building setting in resource-limited countries.2830 Newer techniques continue to be developed allowing for more rapid, sensitive diagnostics particularly in settings of polyparasitism and low worm burden.28

Current therapy for children with helminth infections is based on adult dosing and adult formulations, including benzimidazoles and praziquantel. For treatment of hookworm or roundworm administration of either albendazole 400 mg orally once taken with food or mebendazole 100 mg orally twice a day for 3 days is recommended. For whipworm, albendazole 400 mg orally for 3 to 7 days or mebendazole 100 mg for 3 to 7 days is required, and for schistosomiasis, treatment consists of praziquantel 20 mg/kg orally twice a day for 1 day (see Table 2).9,20

It is evident that as the global community becomes smaller, worm infections in children may become a more common occurrence in pediatric clinics within the United States and other wealthy countries. As a result, it is imperative for the pediatric clinician to understand the historic, current, and prospective landscape of helminth disease in children around the world.

INTRODUCTION TO MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION

The significant life-long morbidity of helminths has led to the commitment of public and private leaders to address controlling and even eliminating these pathogens globally.5 Early goals focused primarily on WASH through improved sanitation, reducing soil and water contamination, and implementing health education within communities.5 These strategies to improve community infrastructure incurred high cost without immediate, noticeable change, prompting a shift toward mass drug administration (MDA), also now referred to by the World Health Organization (WHO) as preventive chemotherapy.5 MDA programs are centered on the regular, repeated administration of preventive chemotherapies, such as benzimidazoles (albendazole, mebendazole) for intestinal helminth infections, ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine citrate for filarial worms, and praziquantel for schistosomiasis.31 It has been anticipated that repeated MDA at regular intervals will reduce worm burden to reduce morbidity, and in areas with low prevalence possibly even inhibit transmission and eventually allow for elimination of helminth infection.5 Early precedent for a mass treatment approach was seen in the United States in the early 1900s.32 In 1910, the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm Disease (RSC) estimated 40% of the population of Southern United States was infected with hookworm. The RSC sponsored treatment administration for more than 400,000 individuals through mobile dispensaries, implemented education campaigns, invested in public health infrastructure, and completed disease mapping among 11 southern states in efforts to reduce hookworm disease.33 Interestingly, in school systems with the highest levels of hookworm burden, children that received therapeutic intervention were found to have greater increases in school enrollment, school attendance, and literacy by 1920. Furthermore, as children that received treatment for hookworm aged into adulthood, they had a substantial gain in income.34 However, the success of this program was multifactorial, relying not only on MDA but also on changes in education, shifts away from agrarian activities toward urbanization, and overall economic development of the Southern United States.3436 Similar economic reforms led to reductions in intestinal helminth infections in Japan and South Korea beginning in the 1950s, as well as in Eastern China beginning in the 1990s.6

MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION PHASE 1 (2001): REDUCTION IN MORBIDITY

Anthelmintics MDA programs gained momentum in 2001, after the release of the 2000 Millennium Development goals,17 and with the adoption of a World Health Assembly Resolution specifically committed to intestinal helminth infections and schistosomiasis.37 Initially, MDA programs focused on controlling worm burden within a community to reduce morbidity within an individual.38 In order to accomplish this goal, a joint statement by WHO and UNICEF in 2004 supported the target of “high-risk” communities, including preschool- and school-aged children, adolescent girls, and women of childbearing age based on worm prevalence.10 Because young children often harbor the greatest burden of worms, focusing on these “high-risk” communities was predicted to generate the greatest impact on morbidity while minimizing the cost for clinical diagnosis.5,3941 To achieve worm control, the WHO estimated that at least 75% of all school-aged children in endemic regions were in need of regular treatment or approximately 875 million children.5,16,42 Early programs administered a single dose of benzimidazole (albendazole or mebendazole) for the treatment of soil-transmitted helminths and a single dose of praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis.38 The medications were found to be generally well tolerated and often administered by community health workers or teachers in school-based programs.38 Furthermore, administration of regular anthelmintics treatment to high-risk groups was found to be affordable and sometimes sustainable.10 However, it has been noted that a single-dose mebendazole or albendazole can exhibit low efficacy against whipworm or hookworm in some settings,43,44 and in some cases, paradoxic drug failure45 or diminished efficacy with repeated use.46 Possibly, some of these findings explain why a Cochrane analysis of randomized clinical trials using MDA approaches failed to conclusively confirm child-health benefits in terms of nutritional benefits, hemoglobin, and school performance.47

MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION PHASE 2 (2005): INTEGRATIVE CONTROL WITH THE “RAPID-IMPACT PACKAGE”

Polyparasitism in children is common due to the geographic overlap of soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis globally. Because of this geographic overlap, MDA programs in high-risk communities were administering multiple therapies to control multiple infections. Furthermore, poor efficacy of monotherapy benzimidazoles, specifically for hookworm or whipworm, highlighted the need for an integrative treatment approach.31 The “rapid-impact” package, the next step in MDA evolution and integration, was a low-cost mechanism proposed in 2005 to distribute multiple drugs to treat multiple parasites simultaneously.48,49 Implementation of the rapid impact package included 4 drug classes: benzimidazoles (albendazole or mebendazole), ivermectin (or diethylcarbamazine citrate in some areas), praziquantel, and azithromycin, allowing for concurrent treatment of soil-transmitted helminths, filarial diseases, schistosomiasis, and trachoma, respectively.5,49 In addition, collateral benefits for yaws, scabies, and other neglected tropical diseases were noted.50 Another advantage of combining albendazole with ivermectin within the medication package was increased drug efficacy for whipworm secondary to cross-reactivity of medications51 and the possibility of slowing the development of resistance to individual drug classes.5,52 Although emergence of anthelmintics drug resistance has not yet been proven for human intestinal helminths or schistosomes, veterinary medicine has demonstrated that widespread, frequent, prolonged administration of anthelmintics chemotherapy within a population increases the risk of drug resistance.53 With this precedent in the veterinary world, the growing evidence of decreased efficacy of mebendazole for whipworm and hookworm46 as well as decreased efficacy of praziquantel for schistosomiasis after repeated use is of increasing concern.54

MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION PHASE 3 (2012): SCALE-UP PROGRAMS FOR ELIMINATION

Despite private and public efforts, the 2010 goal to provide MDA to at least 75% of school-aged children at risk was not met.5 By 2010, only 32.6% of children requiring coverage for soil-transmitted helminths and 14.4% of children requiring coverage for schistosomiasis received adequate therapy. Failure to meet these goals was thought to be secondary to cost-prohibitive programs and the intermittent availability of anthelmintics therapies.52,55 In the early 2010s, the London Declaration of Stakeholders Working Group and the WHO 2020 roadmap advocated for scale-up of MDA programs to not only control infections by providing therapy to 75% of children but also add a new focus on elimination and eradication by interrupting transmission by 2020.16,42,56,57 Emphasis was placed on collaborative and coordinated efforts by both public and private groups to provide funds for expanded coverage combined with commitments by helminth-endemic countries to focus on improvements in community infrastructure.16,42,56,57 Programs were expected to place a larger emphasis on national funding and improvements in national health infrastructure to ensure sustainability.42 Through such renewed commitments, new estimates by the WHO indicate that globally in 2015 more than 60% and 40% of school-aged children receive benzimidazoles and praziquantel, respectively, on an annual basis.58

MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION AS A PATHWAY TOWARD HELMINTH ELIMINATION

Despite the global commitment to global helminth control and elimination, there are significant hurdles toward achieving these goals solely through current MDA approaches. To date, the Global Burden of Disease 2015 has shown only modest reductions in the global prevalence of intestinal helminth infections since MDA was integrated beginning in 2005, with the greatest reductions in ascariasis (12% reduction in prevalence and 20% reduction in age standardized rates) presumably due to its high sensitivity to single-dose albendazole or mebendazole, whereas the gains have been more modest for trichuriasis and hookworm possibly due to reduced efficacies when these drugs are used in a single dose.2 Another factor is the finding that, although ascariasis and trichuriasis intensities are highest among school-aged children, it is common to find both high-prevalence and high-intensity hookworm and schistosomiasis infections among adults. Therefore, MDA for preschool- and school-aged children would not be expected to have an impact on elimination for either hookworm or schistosomiasis. Accordingly, there have been calls to expand MDA to treat entire communities in order to simultaneously target both adults and children.59,60 However, it is unclear whether the concerns highlighted earlier, including paradoxically low drug efficacies or diminished efficacy with increasing use, or even drug resistance would make elimination efforts unattainable even in the setting of community-wide treatments. A survey of several hundred experts in neglected tropical diseases indicated a high degree of uncertainty of achieving elimination targets for intestinal helminth infections or schistosomiasis through MDA alone.61

As global MDA efforts continue to expand and reach the 75% to 100% targets adopted by the 54th World Health Assembly in 2001, a parallel program of research and development is needed to not only improve existing anthelmintics drugs to include pediatric formulations but also develop new innovative anthelmintics drug classes, particularly for whipworm and hookworm. Among those under development are tribendimidine, a cholinergic drug that also works against human liver fluke infection,62 and Cry5B, a Bacillus thuringiensis–derived toxin, known to activate the p38 mitogen–activated protein kinase pathway in both hookworm and ascariasis.63,64 Overall, the pace of human anthelmintics drug development has been slow due to the orphan and neglected status of its disease target. Still another approach has been the development of anthelmintics vaccines, possibly used in combination with existing or new drugs.65 Toward that goal, a human hookworm vaccine is in phase 1 clinical trials, as are 2 new vaccines for schistosomiasis. Vaccine development programs evaluating the possibility of a multivalent anthelmintics vaccine targeting multiple pathogens would additionally provide significant benefit in areas with helminthic geographic overlap.65 Unfortunately, global efforts to advance these vaccines through clinical development and ultimately licensure have also been slowed by the absence of prioritization by the global community relative to vaccines for pandemic disease threats such as Ebola and influenza.

SUMMARY

Helminth infections, soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis, adversely affect the lives of millions of children around the world. With the increase in globalization, pediatricians in wealthy nations are increasingly likely to encounter these infections in their clinic. It is imperative to understand the epidemiology, transmission dynamics, and treatment options for these children in order to prevent significant long-term morbidity. The evolution of the MDA movement has progressed from control to integrative elimination programs specifically targeting young children. Scale-up approaches to include whole communities (including adults) have been proposed with the goal to ultimately achieve interruption in transmission. However, the question remains whether these programs will be efficacious and if repeated treatment within the communities will have a lasting impact on drug resistance. As a result of this uncertainty, there remains a significant need for diagnostic innovation, therapeutic development including new drugs and vaccines, as well as drug resistance monitoring to aid in the control and elimination efforts of helminth infections globally.

KEY POINTS.

  • Soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis are some of the most common infections found in children and adolescents worldwide and cause significant morbidity and chronic disability.

  • Current strategies to reduce morbidity associated with soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis include mass drug administration (MDA) and programs of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH).

  • Although MDA and WASH are reducing the overall prevalence of helminth infections, global elimination remains elusive because of low drug efficacies and reinfection.

  • Alternative strategies, including improved diagnostics, improved worm prevalence and resistance monitoring, new anthelmintics diagnostics, therapies, and vaccines, are required.

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement: Authors deny conflict of interest or any relationship with a commercial company that has a direct financial interest in subject matter or materials discussed in article or with a company making a competing product.

References

  • 1.Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, et al. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bartsch SM, Hotez PJ, Asti L, et al. The global economic and health burden of human hookworm infection. In: de Silva N, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 9. Vol. 10. 2016. p. e0004922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673616310121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tchuem Tchuenté LA. Control of soil-transmitted helminths in sub-Saharan Africa: diagnosis, drug efficacy concerns and challenges. Acta Trop. 2011;120(Suppl):S4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hotez P. Blue Marble Health: an innovative plan to fight diseases of the Poor amid wealth. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016. p. 244. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1603–58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hotez PJ, Bundy DAP, Beegle K, et al. Helminth infections: soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weatherhead JE, Hotez PJ. Worm infections in children. Pediatr Rev. 2015;36(8):341–52. doi: 10.1542/pir.36-8-341. [quiz: 353–4] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization Expert Committee. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2002;912:1–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miguel E, Kremer M. Worms: identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica. 2004;72(1):159–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Briggs N, Weatherhead J, Sastry KJ, et al. The hygiene hypothesis and its inconvenient truths about helminth infections. In: Cooper PJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 9. Vol. 10. 2016. p. e0004944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hotez P, Whitham M. Helminth infections: a new global women’s health agenda. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):155–60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brooker S, Akhwale W, Pullan R, et al. Epidemiology of plasmodium-helminth co-infection in Africa: populations at risk, potential impact on anemia, and prospects for combining control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(6 Suppl):88–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.King CH, Dangerfield-Cha M. The unacknowledged impact of chronic schistosomiasis. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(1):65–79. doi: 10.1177/1742395307084407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.World Health Organization. [Accessed October 6, 2016];Investing to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases. 2015 Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/152781/1/9789241564861_eng.pdf.
  • 17.Hotez PJ, Molyneux D, Hotez P, et al. NTDs V.2.0: “Blue Marble Health”—neglected tropical disease control and elimination in a shifting health policy landscape. In: Knopp S, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 11. Vol. 7. 2013. p. e2570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brindley PJ, Costa da JM, Sripa B, et al. Why does infection with some helminths cause cancer? Trends Cancer. 2015;1(3):174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu C, Luo R, Yi H, et al. Soil-transmitted helminths in Southwestern China: a cross-sectional study of links to cognitive ability, nutrition, and school performance among children. In: Gray DJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 6. Vol. 9. 2015. p. e0003877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kappagoda S, Singh U, Blackburn B. Antiparasitic therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(6):561–83. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diseases USD of H and HSNC for E and ZI. [Accessed April 12, 2017];Guidelines for the U.S. Domestic Medical Examination for Newly Arrived Refugees. 2013 Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/domestic/domestic-guidelines.html.
  • 22.Lee RM, Moore LB, Bottazzi ME, et al. Toxocariasis in North America: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8):e3116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Borecka A, Kłapeć T. Epidemiology of human toxocariasis in Poland - a review of cases 1978–2009. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(1):28–31. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1141364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hotez PJ, Gurwith M. Europe’s neglected infections of poverty. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15(9):e611–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Starr MC, Montgomery SP. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis in the United States: a systematic review - 1940–2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85(4):680–4. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Berry A, Fillaux J, Martin-Blondel G, et al. Evidence for a permanent presence of schistosomiasis in Corsica, France, 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(1):30100. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.1.30100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mosli M, Gregor J, Chande N, et al. Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58(5):653–9. doi: 10.1139/w2012-039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mejia R, Vicuña Y, Broncano N, et al. A novel, multi-parallel, real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for eight gastrointestinal parasites provides improved diagnostic capabilities to resource-limited at-risk populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(6):1041–7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cimino RO, Jeun R, Juarez M, et al. Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:380. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0994-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pilotte N, Papaiakovou M, Grant JR, et al. Improved PCR-based detection of soil transmitted helminth infections using a next-generation sequencing approach to assay design. In: Albonico M, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 3. Vol. 10. 2016. p. e0004578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hotez PJ, Molyneux DH, Fenwick A, et al. Control of neglected tropical diseases. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(10):1018–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra064142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Crompton DWT, Montresor A, Nesheim MC, et al., editors. World Health Organization. Controlling disease due to helminth infections. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2003. [Accessed November 21, 2016]. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42707/1/9241562390.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rockefeller Foundation. [Accessed November 18, 2016];100 Years: The Rockefeller Foundation | Eradicating Hookworm Health. Available at: http://rockefeller100.org/exhibits/show/health/eradicating-hookworm.
  • 34.Bleakley H. Disease and development: evidence from hookworm eradication in the American South. Q J Econ. 2007;122(1):73–117. doi: 10.1162/qjec.121.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Humphreys M. How four once common diseases were eliminated from the American South. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(6):1734–44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martin MG, Humphreys ME. Social consequence of disease in the American South, 1900-world War. South Med J. 2006;99(8):862–4. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000231265.03256.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fifty-Fourth World Health Assembly. [Accessed November 18, 2016];WHA54.19 Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections. 2001 Available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA54/ea54r19.pdf?ua=1.
  • 38.Urbani C, Albonico M. Anthelminthic drug safety and drug administration in the control of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in community campaigns. Acta Trop. 2003;86(2):215–21. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00036-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Truscott J, Turner H, Anderson R. What impact will the achievement of the current World Health Organisation targets for anthelmintic treatment coverage in children have on the intensity of soil transmitted helminth infections? Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:551. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1135-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hicks JH, Kremer M, Miguel E. The case for mass treatment of intestinal helminths in endemic areas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(10):e0004214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anderson R, Truscott J, Hollingsworth TD. The coverage and frequency of mass drug administration required to eliminate persistent transmission of soil-transmitted helminths. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1645):20130435. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.World Health Organization. Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical disease: a roadmap for implementation. WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2012. [Accessed August 10, 2016]. Available at: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/NTD_RoadMap_2012_Fullversion.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Keiser J, Utzinger J. Efficacy of current drugs against soil-transmitted helminth infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;299(16):1937–48. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Soukhathammavong PA, Sayasone S, Phongluxa K, et al. Low efficacy of single-dose albendazole and mebendazole against hookworm and effect on concomitant helminth infection in Lao PDR. In: Prichard RK, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 1. Vol. 6. 2012. p. e1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.De Clercq D, Sacko M, Behnke J, et al. Failure of mebendazole in treatment of human hookworm infections in the southern region of Mali. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57(1):25–30. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Albonico M, Bickle Q, Ramsan M, et al. Efficacy of mebendazole and levamisole alone or in combination against intestinal nematode infections after repeated targeted mebendazole treatment in Zanzibar. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(5):343–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Taylor-Robinson DC, Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, et al. Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;23(7) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub6. CD000371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Prichard RK, Basá Ñ, Ez M-G, Boatin BA, et al. A research agenda for helminth diseases of humans: intervention for control and elimination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(4):e1549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Molyneux DH, Hotez PJ, Fenwick A. “Rapid-impact interventions”: how a policy of integrated control for Africa’s neglected tropical diseases could benefit the poor. PLoS Med. 2005;2(11):e336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hotez PJ, Velasquez RM, Wolf JE. Neglected tropical skin diseases: their global elimination through integrated mass drug administration? JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):481–2. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hotez P. Mass drug administration and integrated control for the world’s high-prevalence neglected tropical diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(6):659–64. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.WHO Regional Committee. [Accessed April 12, 2017];Fifty-ninth Session of the WHO Regional Committee (AFR/RC59/19) 2009 Available at: http://www.afro.who.int/en/fifty-ninth-session.html.
  • 53.Geerts S, Gryseels B. Anthelmintic resistance in human helminths: a review. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6(11):915–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Crellen T, Walker M, Lamberton PHL, et al. Reduced efficacy of praziquantel against schistosoma mansoni is associated with multiple rounds of mass drug administration. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(9):1151–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chami GF, Kontoleon AA, Bulte E, et al. Profiling nonrecipients of mass drug administration for schistosomiasis and hookworm infections: a comprehensive analysis of praziquantel and albendazole coverage in community-directed treatment in Uganda. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(2):200–7. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Uniting to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases. [Accessed August 17, 2016];Delivering on promises and driving progress: uniting to combat neglected tropical diseases. Available at: http://unitingtocombatntds.org/resource/promises-progress-first-report-londondeclaration-ntds.
  • 57.London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases. [Accessed August 17, 2016];Uniting to combat neglected tropical diseases. 2012 Available at: http://unitingtocombatntds.org/
  • 58.Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: progress report, 2015. [Accessed November 18, 2016];Weekly Epidemiol Rec. 2016 91:441–60. Available at: http://www.who.int/wer. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Anderson RM, Turner HC, Farrell SH, et al. Studies of the transmission dynamics, mathematical model development and the control of schistosome parasites by mass drug administration in human communities. Adv Parasitol. 2016;94:199–246. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Truscott JE, Turner HC, Farrell SH, et al. Soil-transmitted helminths: mathematical models of transmission, the impact of mass drug administration and transmission elimination criteria. Adv Parasitol. 2016;94:133–98. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Keenan JD, Hotez PJ, Amza A, et al. Elimination and eradication of neglected tropical diseases with mass drug administrations: a survey of experts. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(12):e2562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Robertson AP, Puttachary S, Buxton SK, et al. Tribendimidine: mode of action and nAChR subtype selectivity in ascaris and oesophagostomum. In: Keiser J, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2. Vol. 9. 2015. p. e0003495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Urban JF, Hu Y, Miller MM, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Cry5B has potent anthelmintic activity against ascaris suum. In: Geary TG, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 6. Vol. 7. 2013. p. e2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cappello M, Bungiro RD, Harrison LM, et al. A purified Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein with therapeutic activity against the hookworm parasite Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(41):15154–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607002103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hotez PJ, Strych U, Lustigman S, et al. Human anthelminthic vaccines: rationale and challenges. Vaccine. 2016;34:3549–55. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES