Abstract
A new preparation of δ-lactams is reported. In the presence of a Lewis acid promoter, alkoxyisocoumarins engage a range of N-aryl and N-alkyl imines to form δ-lactams with a pendent carboalkoxy substituent. A sulfonamide-thiourea catalyst enables the synthesis of these products in moderate to good enantioselectivities.

Formal [4+2] cycloadditions of imines with enolizable anhydrides provide a convenient entry to lactams that bear a pendent carboxylic acid functionality (Scheme 1).1 Reactions of imines with succinic anhydride furnish γ-lactams, as first shown by Castagnoli.2 Cushman and Haimova established that δ-lactams can be constructed from homophthalic anhydride (1) and related materials.3 Numerous variants have been reported, and both acyclic and cyclic imines participate in this chemistry.1,4 The formal [4+2] cycloaddition has been utilized as a key step in alkaloid synthesis,5 and has enabled the preparation of a range of products with diverse bioactivities and medicinal applications.6 While asymmetric variants based on enantioenriched starting materials and chiral auxiliaries have been known for some time,7 a catalytic enantioselective approach was reported by us only recently.8,9 In the majority of studies, the initially formed carboxylic acid containing products are, for the purpose of easier isolation, purification, and further processing, subsequently converted into the corresponding lactam esters.1 Here we report an approach that provides lactam esters directly by replacing homophthalic anhydride (1) with an alkoxyisocoumarin 3 as the starting material.
Scheme 1.

Approaches to the synthesis of lactams from imines.
A plausible mechanism of the formal [4+2] cycloaddition of enolizable anhydrides such as homophthalic anhydride (1) and imines involves an initial Mannich step.4f,10 This step is likely initiated by protonation of the imine by the relatively acidic anhydride (pKa of 1 = 8.15)11 or other acid, followed by collapse of the iminium enol (enolate) pair. A closely related mechanistic alternative is a Mannich reaction involving a hydrogen-bonded complex of the imine with the enol form of the anhydride. The Mannich addition step is followed by Perkin-like intramolecular acyl transfer, leading to the lactam product bearing a carboxylic acid functionality. We reasoned that the initial step could be modified into a Mukaiyama-type Mannich addition by substituting homophthalic anhydride (1) with an alkoxyisocoumarin 3, inasmuch as the latter contains a pre-formed enol-type moiety. Indeed, isolated previous reports hint at this possibility. For instance, 3-alkylamino isochromenones have been reported to form δ-lactam amides upon reaction with imines.12 Bis(trimethylsilyloxy)furans have been utilized in the synthesis of γ-lactam acids corresponding to the products reported by Castagnoli.13 To our knowledge, such an approach has not been utilized in the preparation of synthetically valuable δ-lactam esters from imines and alkoxyisocoumarins. Inspired by known asymmetric Mukaiyama Mannich reactions involving alkyl enol ethers and silyl ketene acetals,14 we reasoned that the use of alkoxyisocoumarins could provide a platform for the development of a catalytic enantioselective variant.
Aniline-derived imines were found not to undergo reactions with methoxyisocoumarin (3a)15 at room temperature. Attempted reactions at elevated temperatures in the absence of additives also did not lead to favorable outcomes. Upon evaluation of a range of Lewis acid additives at room temperature, boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3•OEt2) was identified as an efficient promoter of the title reaction.16,17 Crude reaction mixtures were treated with sodium methoxide solution to epimerize the initial cis/trans mixtures of products to the thermodynamically more stable trans isomers. The scope of this transformation is illustrated in Scheme 2. For instance, a reaction of N-benzylideneaniline with 3a provided 4a in 63% yield. Related imines underwent lactam formation with similar efficiencies. A range of aryl and hetero-aryl groups were well tolerated in this reaction. The combination of N-benzyl imine and 3,4-dihydroisoquinoline required heating for several days to give the desired products 4m and 4n – partial decomposition of starting materials was observed after extended reaction times.
Scheme 2.

Scope of the Lewis acid promoted reaction. Yields reflect chromatographically purified compounds. b With ethoxyisocoumarin. c Reaction was performed at 45 °C.
After establishing the racemic reaction, we sought to develop a catalytic enantioselective variant. As a comparative starting point, and by using conditions already reported,8 we examined the enantioselective reaction between homophthalic anhydride 1 and several dihydroisoquinolines in the presence of amide-thiourea catalyst 2a (Scheme 3). The uncatalyzed background reaction for these substrates is exceedingly fast – complete consumption of starting materials was observed within minutes at room temperature. At −55 °C, the relative rate of the catalyzed reaction over the uncatalyzed process was more favorable. Even under these conditions, the enantioselectivities observed for 5a–5d were moderate (up to 66% ee) and the kinetic trans isomer was isolated preferentially. Extended reaction times led to poorer diastereoselectivities and slightly reduced enantioselectivities, as partial epimerization to the cis isomers occurred.
Scheme 3.

Catalytic enantioselective reactions of homophthalic anhydride and imines. Yields reflect chromatographically purified compounds. The ee values were determined by HPLC analysis; see the Supporting Information for details. The absolute configurations of the products are tentatively assigned based on comparison with literature values for optical rotation.
Conditions for the catalytic enantioselective addition of alkoxyisocoumarins 3 to dihydroisoquinoline were developed next (Table 1). In the absence of catalyst, only trace amounts of product formed at room temperature over the course of 72 hours (entry 1). Following an extensive screening of hydrogen bond donor organocatalysts18 with the potential ability to activate the imine electrophile,19 sulfonamide-thiourea compound 2b20g was identified as a promising catalyst.20 After a reaction time of 24 h, product 6a was obtained with excellent diastereoselectivity in 50% yield and 52% ee (entry 2). Notably, the thermodynamically favored cis isomer was isolated, rendering this approach complementary to the reaction of dihydroisoquinoline with homophthalic anhydride (1). A switch of solvent from toluene to trifluorotoluene provided a slight increase in enantioselectivity (entry 3). Different alkoxy groups on nucleophile 3 conferred different rates and enantioselectivities,19 with ethoxyisocoumarin providing the highest enantioselectivities (entries 4 and 5). A marked improvement in product ee was observed upon performing the reaction at 0 °C, accompanied by the expected drop in reaction rate (entry 6). Improved results were obtained by conducting the reaction in the presence of catalytic amounts of pyridine.21 Product 6b was isolated with excellent diastereoselectivity in 61% yield and 81% ee (entry 7). A number of substituted dihydroisoquinolines were evaluated under the optimized conditions and were found to provide comparable results (Scheme 4). Unfortunately, aniline-derived imines were insufficiently reactive under these conditions – only trace amounts of product were observed in a number of reactions conducted at room temperature for several days.
Table 1.
Evaluation of catalytic enantioselective variant with alkoxyisocoumarins.a
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | R | solvent | time [h] | yield (%) | dr | ee (%) |
| 1b | Me | PhMe | 72 | trace | - | - |
| 2 | Me | PhMe | 24 | 50 | >19:1 | 52 |
| 3 | Me | PhCF3 | 24 | 47 | >19:1 | 56 |
| 4 | Et | PhMe | 24 | 47 | >19:1 | 65 |
| 5 | Et | PhCF3 | 24 | 55 | >19:1 | 68 |
| 6c | Et | PhCF3 | 64 | 35 | >19:1 | 81 |
| 7c,d | Et | PhCF3 | 121 | 61 | >19:1 | 81 |
Yields reflect chromatographically purified compounds. The ee values were determined by HPLC analysis; see the Supporting Information for details. The absolute configurations of the products are tentatively assigned based on comparison with literature values for optical rotation.
The reaction was performed without any catalyst.
The reaction was performed at 0 °C.
With 25 mol% of pyridine.
Scheme 4.

Enantioselective reactions of alkoxyisocoumarins and dihydroisoquinolines. Yields reflect chromatographically purified compounds. The ee values were determined by HPLC analysis; see the Supporting Information for details. The absolute configurations of the products were not established.
Conclusions
We have developed a new preparation of δ-lactams that features an alkoxyisocoumarin nucleophile. The products contain the core structure of the tetrahydroprotoberberine class of alkaloids. A catalytic enantioselective version of this transformation exhibits good levels of enantioselectivity, and the diastereoselectivity is complementary to the classic approach that utilizes homophthalic anhydride as the pro-nucleophile.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE–1565599 to D.S.). S.K. thanks the NIH (Grant No. AI090662) and the Rutgers Aresty program for financial support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and characterization data. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
- 1.(a) Gonzalez-Lopez M, Shaw JT. Chem Rev. 2009;109:164. doi: 10.1021/cr8002714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Krasavin M, Dar’in D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:1635. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Castagnoli N. J Org Chem. 1969;34:3187. doi: 10.1021/jo01262a081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Castagnoli N, Cushman M. J Org Chem. 1971;36:3404. doi: 10.1021/jo00821a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Cushman M, Gentry J, Dekow FW. J Org Chem. 1977;42:1111. doi: 10.1021/jo00427a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Haimova MA, Mollov NM, Ivanova SC, Dimitrova AI, Ognyanov VI. Tetrahedron. 1977;33:331. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selected recent examples of racemic [4+2] cycloadditions between enolizable anhydrides and imines: Elsayed MSA, Zeller M, Cushman M. Synth Commun. 2016;46:1902. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2016.1232409.Adamovskyi MI, Ryabukhin SV, Sibgatulin DA, Rusanov E, Grygorenko OO. Org Lett. 2017;19:130. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03426.Laws SW, Moore LC, Di Maso MJ, Nguyen QNN, Tantillo DJ, Shaw JT. Org Lett. 2017;19:2466. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00468.Wang Z, Barrows RD, Emge TJ, Knapp S. Org Process Res Dev. 2017;21:399.Bakulina O, Dar’in D, Krasavin M. Synlett. 2017;28:1165.Polyak D, Phung N, Liu J, Barrows R, Emge TJ, Knapp S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:3879. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.08.070.
- 5.(a) Iwasa K, Gupta YP, Cushman M. J Org Chem. 1981;46:4744. [Google Scholar]; (b) Iwasa K, Gupta YP, Cushman M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22:2333. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Cinelli MA, Reddy PVN, Lv P-C, Liang J-H, Chen L, Agama K, Pommier Y, van Breemen RB, Cushman M. J Med Chem. 2012;55:10844. doi: 10.1021/jm300519w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jiménez-Díaz MB, Ebert D, Salinas Y, Pradhan A, Lehane AM, Myrand-Lapierre M-E, O’Loughlin KG, Shackleford DM, Justino de Almeida M, Carrillo AK, Clark JA, Dennis ASM, Diep J, Deng X, Duffy S, Endsley AN, Fedewa G, Guiguemde WA, Gómez MG, Holbrook G, Horst J, Kim CC, Liu J, Lee MCS, Matheny A, Martínez MS, Miller G, Rodríguez-Alejandre A, Sanz L, Sigal M, Spillman NJ, Stein PD, Wang Z, Zhu F, Waterson D, Knapp S, Shelat A, Avery VM, Fidock DA, Gamo F-J, Charman SA, Mirsalis JC, Ma H, Ferrer S, Kirk K, Angulo-Barturen I, Kyle DE, DeRisi JL, Floyd DM, Guy RK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E5455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414221111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nguyen TX, Abdelmalak M, Marchand C, Agama K, Pommier Y, Cushman M. J Med Chem. 2015;58:3188. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chatterjee M, Hartung A, Holzgrabe U, Mueller E, Peinz U, Sotriffer C, Zilian D. Julius-Maximilians-Universitaet; Wuerzburg, Germany: 2015. p. 38. [Google Scholar]; (e) Floyd DM, Stein P, Wang Z, Liu J, Castro S, Clark JA, Connelly M, Zhu F, Holbrook G, Matheny A, Sigal MS, Min J, Dhinakaran R, Krishnan S, Bashyum S, Knapp S, Guy RK. J Med Chem. 2016;59:7950. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Examples of asymmetric variants (via enantioenriched starting materials, chiral auxiliaries, or resolutions): Cushman M, Chen JK. J Org Chem. 1987;52:1517.Clark RD, Souchet M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:193.Vara Y, Bello T, Aldaba E, Arrieta A, Pizarro JL, Arriortua MI, Lopez X, Cossio FP. Org Lett. 2008;10:4759. doi: 10.1021/ol801757r.Tan DQ, Younai A, Pattawong O, Fettinger JC, Cheong PH-Y, Shaw JT. Org Lett. 2013;15:5126. doi: 10.1021/ol402554n.Liu J, Wang Z, Levin A, Emge TJ, Rablen PR, Floyd DM, Knapp S. J Org Chem. 2014;79:7593. doi: 10.1021/jo501316m.. See also references 5.
- 8.Jarvis CL, Hirschi JS, Vetticatt MJ, Seidel D. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:2670. doi: 10.1002/anie.201612148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.For a mechanistically distinct catalytic enantioselective variant with N-sulfonyl imines, see: Cronin SA, Gutierrez Collar A, Gundala S, Cornaggia C, Torrente E, Manoni F, Botte A, Twamley B, Connon SJ. Org Biomol Chem. 2016;14:6955. doi: 10.1039/c6ob00048g.
- 10.Selected publications discussing the mechanism of the formal [4+2] cycloaddition of imines and anhydrides: Cushman M, Madaj EJ. J Org Chem. 1987;52:907.Kaneti J, Bakalova SM, Pojarlieff IG. J Org Chem. 2003;68:6824. doi: 10.1021/jo034240j.Pattawong O, Tan DQ, Fettinger JC, Shaw JT, Cheong PH-Y. Org Lett. 2013;15:5130. doi: 10.1021/ol402561q.Di Maso MJ, Snyder KM, De Souza Fernandes F, Pattawong O, Tan DQ, Fettinger JC, Cheong PH-Y, Shaw JT. Chem Eur J. 2016;22:4794. doi: 10.1002/chem.201504424.
- 11.Mofaddel N, Bar N, Villemin D, Desbène PL. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004;380:664. doi: 10.1007/s00216-004-2784-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boyd GV, Monteil RL, Lindley PF, Mahmoud MM. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1978;1:1351. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pohmakotr M, Yotapan N, Tuchinda P, Kuhakarn C, Reutrakul V. J Org Chem. 2007;72:5016. doi: 10.1021/jo070533r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Selected examples of catalytic enantioselective Mukaiyama Mannich reactions: Ishitani H, Ueno M, Kobayashi S. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:7153.Hagiwara E, Fujii A, Sodeoka M. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:2474.Xue S, Yu S, Deng Y, Wulff WD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:2271. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010618)40:12<2271::AID-ANIE2271>3.0.CO;2-N.Kobayashi S, Hamada T, Manabe K. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:5640. doi: 10.1021/ja026094p.Wenzel AG, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:12964. doi: 10.1021/ja028353g.Akiyama T, Itoh J, Yokota K, Fuchibe K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:1566. doi: 10.1002/anie.200353240.Jones CR, Pantoş GD, Morrison AJ, Smith MD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:7391. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903063.Kashikura W, Mori K, Akiyama T. Org Lett. 2011;13:1860. doi: 10.1021/ol200374m.(i) Wang Q, Leutzsch M, van Gemmeren M, List B. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:15334. doi: 10.1021/ja408747m.Gheewala CD, Collins BE, Lambert TH. Science. 2016;351:961. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0591.Yu J-S, Zhou J. Org Chem Front. 2016;3:298.Zhou F, Yamamoto H. Org Lett. 2016;18:4974. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02262.Zhou F, Yamamoto H. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:8970. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603929.
- 15.Bihel FJJ, Hellal M, Bourguignon J-J. Synthesis. 2007;2007:3791. [Google Scholar]
- 16.The addition of catalytic amounts of BF3•OEt2 as well as several other Lewis acids including AuCl3, Zn(OTf)2, and Ni(acac)2 provided little to no product. Stoichiometric quantities of other additives such as Ti(OiPr)3Cl and AgOAc were also ineffective in promoting the title reaction.
- 17.Selected reports of Lewis acid-promoted reactions between homophthalic anhydride (1) and imines: Yu N, Bourel L, Deprez B, Gesquiere J-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:829.Azizian J, Mohammadi AA, Karimi AR, Mohammadizadeh MR. J Org Chem. 2005;70:350. doi: 10.1021/jo049138g.Wang L, Liu J, Tian H, Qian C, Sun J. Adv Synth Catal. 2005;347:689.Mohammadi MH, Mohammadi AA. Synth Commun. 2011;41:523.
- 18.Selected reviews on hydrogen bonding catalysis: Schreiner PR. Chem Soc Rev. 2003;32:289. doi: 10.1039/b107298f.Takemoto Y. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:4299. doi: 10.1039/b511216h.Taylor MS, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:1520. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503132.Connon SJ. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:5418. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501076.Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5713. doi: 10.1021/cr068373r.Akiyama T. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5744. doi: 10.1021/cr068374j.Yu X, Wang W. Chem Asian J. 2008;3:516. doi: 10.1002/asia.200700415.Pihko PM, editor. Hydrogen Bonding in Organic Synthesis. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2009. Schenker S, Zamfir A, Freund M, Tsogoeva SB. Eur J Org Chem. 2011:2209.Parmar D, Sugiono E, Raja S, Rueping M. Chem Rev. 2014;114:9047. doi: 10.1021/cr5001496.Auvil TJ, Schafer AG, Mattson AE. Eur J Org Chem. 2014;2014:2633.
- 19.See the Supporting Information for details.
- 20.Selected examples of organocatalysts containing sulfonamide moieties: Zhuang W, Hazell RG, Jørgensen KA. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:2566. doi: 10.1039/b505220c.Wang C-J, Zhang Z-H, Dong X-Q, Wu X-J. Chem Commun. 2008:1431. doi: 10.1039/b718949d.Xue F, Zhang S, Duan W, Wang W. Adv Synth Catal. 2008;350:2194.Oh SH, Rho HS, Lee JW, Lee JE, Youk SH, Chin J, Song CE. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:7872. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801636.Kano T, Yamaguchi Y, Maruoka K. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:6678. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900267.Yang H, Carter RG. Synlett. 2010;2010:2827. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1259020.Klauber EG, De CK, Shah TK, Seidel D. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13624. doi: 10.1021/ja105337h.Moteki SA, Han J, Arimitsu S, Akakura M, Nakayama K, Maruoka K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:1187. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107239.Hou W, Zheng B, Chen J, Peng Y. Org Lett. 2012;14:2378. doi: 10.1021/ol300798t.Sakai T, Hirashima S-i, Yamashita Y, Arai R, Nakashima K, Yoshida A, Koseki Y, Miura T. J Org Chem. 2017;82:4661. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00287.
- 21.While the exact role of the pyridine additive remains unclear at present, it may facilitate catalyst turnover. Additional results in support of this notion are provided on page S-6 of the Supporting Information.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
