Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2018 Aug 2;9:1676. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01676

Population Structure, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence-Associated Genes in Campylobacter jejuni Isolated From Three Ecological Niches: Gastroenteritis Patients, Broilers, and Wild Birds

Yaidelys Iglesias-Torrens 1,2, Elisenda Miró 1,*, Pedro Guirado 3, Teresa Llovet 1,2, Carmen Muñoz 1,2, Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar 4, Cristina Madrid 3, Carlos Balsalobre 3,*, Ferran Navarro 1,2
PMCID: PMC6083060  PMID: 30116225

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is the causal agent of the food-borne infection with the highest incidence in Europe. Both poultry and wild birds are a major reservoir. To gain insight into the population structure, virulence potential, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a collection of 150 isolates from three different ecological niches (broilers, wild birds, and human patients) was studied. Despite the high genetic diversity found, the population structure defined two distinct clusters, one formed mostly by broiler and human isolates and another one by most wild bird isolates. The ST-21 complex exhibits highest prevalence (in humans and broilers), followed by ST-1275 complex (only in wild birds). The ST-48, -45, and -354 complexes were found in all three niches, but represent only 22 out of 150 studied strains. A higher occurrence of AMR and multidrug resistance was detected among broiler and human isolates. Moreover, significant differences were found in the distribution of certain putative virulence genes. Remarkably, many wild bird strains were negative for either cdtA, cdtB, or cdtC from the canonical strain 81-176, whereas all broiler and human strains were positive. These data suggest that the different variants of the cdt genes might be relevant for the efficient colonization of certain hosts by C. jejuni. Our study contributes to the understanding of the role of the diverse Campylobacter reservoirs in the transmission of campylobacteriosis to humans.

Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni, PFGE, MLST, antimicrobial resistance, pathogenicity genes

Introduction

In the last decade, there has been an increase in the incidence of campylobacteriosis worldwide, which is especially significant in North America, Europe, and Australia (Cody et al., 2012; Harvala et al., 2016). This zoonosis is therefore of economic and public health concern (Havelaar et al., 2015). Particularly in the European Union, Campylobacter has outnumbered Salmonella as the most commonly reported cause of bacterial diarrheal disease in humans since 2005 (EFSA-ECDC, 2016). Campylobacter jejuni followed by C. coli are responsible for the vast majority of infections which lead to diarrhea and a range of other serious conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract, especially in children under 5 years old (Eberle and Kiess, 2012; Kaakoush et al., 2015). Furthermore, two autoimmune neurological disorders, Guillain-Barre and Miller-Fisher syndromes have been associated in some patients with previous C. jejuni infections (Ang et al., 2001; van Doorn et al., 2008).

The natural reservoir of Campylobacter are a variety of domesticated and wild animals, including cats, dogs, cows, pigs, poultry, and wild birds, with the avian reservoir being the most important (Kaakoush et al., 2015). Campylobacter can be easily isolated from poultry retail meat, untreated water, unpasteurized milk, and soil (Workman et al., 2005; Engberg, 2006).

Since C. jejuni infections are usually self-limited and sporadic, antimicrobial therapy is only indicated in severe or long-lasting infections. The antimicrobials of choice are macrolides, sometimes combined with azithromycin and aminoglycosides in more severe cases of the disease (Moore et al., 2005; Bolinger and Kathariou, 2017). The use of fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines, often prescribed as empirical therapy for traveler’s diarrhea (Guerrant et al., 2001), has been reduced due to the dramatic increase of the frequency of resistant strains to these antimicrobial agents. Unfortunately macrolide resistance is increasingly being reported too (Lim et al., 2016).

Although the infection route has been described, the pathogenicity of Campylobacter remains mostly elusive. Very little is known on the bacterial factors exploited by Campylobacter during the infectious process. Besides the flagella and lipoligosaccharide, some putative virulence factors have been defined such as the cytolethal distending toxin (CdtABC), the fibronectin binding protein (CadF), and the invasion antigen (CiaB) (Young et al., 2007; Dasti et al., 2010). Moreover, factors that can be relevant for Campylobacter host adaptation and transmission have recently been identified by whole-genome sequencing studies (Pascoe et al., 2015; Thépault et al., 2017; Yahara et al., 2017).

Characterization of the population structure of Campylobacter strains recovered from different sources within a region and its antimicrobial resistance is critical to identify the major source of infection and to implement efficient control measures to reduce human exposure to the pathogen. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) have been used to determine clonal diversity and population structure, respectively (Duarte et al., 2016). Moreover, gaining insight into the distribution of virulence-associated genes among strains might shed some light on the mechanisms exploited by Campylobacter to trigger infection.

In this study, we have characterized three populations of Campylobacter strains from different ecological niches: human patients suffering gastroenteritis, broilers, and wild birds. The relationship among the different strains in terms of population structure, antimicrobial resistance profile, and prevalence of virulence-associated genes has been established.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains

A total of 150 isolates were obtained from feces of three different sources: human patients, broilers, and wild birds. Human isolates were obtained from the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital (Barcelona) strain collection. Isolates were originally recovered from routine stool samples of 50 patients with diarrhea attended through the year 2014. All samples were anonymized. The patients were 54% children (≤ 16 years old), 30% adults, and 16% elderly people (≥ 65 years old). From these, 58% were men and 42% women. Domestic and wild avian isolates belong to a Campylobacter strain collection from previous studies conducted at IRTA-CReSA. Broiler (Gallus gallus) isolates were obtained from caecal samples collected in seven different slaughterhouses (A–G), from 2009 and 2011 to 2013. Broilers were originally from 24 farms located in Barcelona, Lleida, and Tarragona (Catalonia) (Table 1). Finally, the wild bird fecal samples from cloacal swabs were obtained during 2008–2013. Wild bird species sampled were: 1 northern shoveler (Spatula clypeata), 2 white storks (Ciconia ciconia), 5 common ravens (Corvus corax), 14 feral pigeons (Columba livia), 7 yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis), and 21 Audouin’s gulls (Larus audouinii) (Table 2). All wild bird samples were collected in Catalonia, except eight from Audouin’s gulls which were obtained from Alboran Island. Sampling methods were in compliance with the Ethical Principles in Animal Research of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the regulations required by the Ethics Commission in Animal Experimentation of the Generalitat de Catalunya. Field permits were authorized by Generalitat de Catalunya and Junta de Andalucia. All sampling procedures and/or experimental manipulations in the field were reviewed and approved as part of obtaining the field permit.

Table 1.

Geographical relation between ST-complex and sequence types (STs) among C. jejuni from broiler caeca.

Slaughterhouse (n) ST-complex∗∗ ST Year Farm Farm Location Strain
A (8) S 441 2011 ES44 Lleida B44
ST-21 21 2013 ES28 Lleida B36
ST-45 45 2013 ES3 Lleida B31
137 2012 ES41 Lleida B42
ST-353 5 2013 ES52 Lleida B29
ST-354 354 2013 ES52 Lleida B45
ST-607 904 2011 ES28 Lleida B47
2013 ES3 Lleida B38
B (6) S 531 2013 ES138 Barcelona B16
ST-45 652 2013 ES138 Barcelona B22
ST-464 464 2013 ES129 Barcelona B15
ST-574 305 2015 ES129 Barcelona B21
2013 ES138 Barcelona B25
ST-607 1707 2013 ES129 Barcelona B24
C (6) S 7114 2013 ES191 Barcelona B39
ST-283 267 2013 ES191 Barcelona B33
ST-353 5 2013 ES193 Barcelona B28
400 2013 ES193 Barcelona B18
ST-48 48 2011 ES193 Barcelona B09
ST-464 464 2011 ES191 Barcelona B08
D (9) S 1710 2013 ES125 Tarragona B26
S 1710 2013 ES128 Tarragona B35
ST-21 50 2012 ES116/CAT5 Tarragona B14/B50
883 2013 ES116 Tarragona B17
ST-353 400 2013 ES116/ES115 Tarragona B30/B40
ST-354 8498 2013 ES125 Tarragona B37
ST-607 607 2013 ES128 Tarragona B41
E (9) S 1710 2011 ES84 Lleida B10
S 2331 2011 ES84 Lleida B02
ST-21 21 2013 ES84 Lleida B20/B46
ST-45 45 2013 ES85 Lleida B27
ST-257 2254 2012 ES202 Lleida B13
ST-353 356 2013 ES202 Lleida B48
ST-354 354 2013 ES84 Lleida B23
ST-607 7110 2012 CAT1 Lleida B51
F (6) ST-21 883 2011 ES156 Barcelona B06
50 2011 ES184 Tarragona B07
ST-206 46 2012 ES156 Barcelona B49
ST-353 400 2012 ES154 Lleida B05
ST-607 607 2011 ES147 Lleida B04
7110 2013 ES154 Lleida B19
G (6) ST-257 367 2009 CT1/EU Lleida B57/B52, B53, B54, B55, B56

n means number of strains. Includes the six strains belonging to Clone 1 of PFGE pattern. ∗∗S means singleton.

Table 2.

Distribution of ST-complexes and sequence types (STs) of C. jejuni strains from wild birds.

Wild bird ST-complex ST Location Strains (Year of recollection)
Audouin’s gull (21) ST-446 (1) 3552 Alboran Island W12 (2010)
ST-1034 (1) 4001 Ebro Delta W05 (2009)
ST-1275 (12) 1223 Ebro Delta W03 (2009), W10 (2010), W15 (2010), W18 (2011), W21 (2011)
1268 Ebro Delta W22 (2011)
1275 Ebro Delta W04 (2009), W09 (2010), W20 (2010)
1292 Alboran Island W14 (2010), W16 (2010)
3629 Ebro Delta W19 (2010)
Singletons (7) 1261 Ebro Delta W11 (2010)
1343 Alboran Island W13 (2010), W23 (2010)
2351 Ebro Delta W17 (2011)
4355 Alboran Island W06 (2009), W07 (2009), W08 (2009)
Yellow-legged gull (7) ST-45 (1) 45 Barcelona W30 (2014)
ST-48 (1) 48 Barcelona W29 (2014)
ST-354 (1) 354 Medes Islands W28 (2013)
ST-1275 (4) 637 Medes Islands W24 (2012), W27 (2013)
3049 Medes Islands W26 (2013)
8511 Medes Islands W25 (2012)
Common Ravens (5) ST-354 (1) 354 Barcelona province W54 (2008)
ST-952 (3) 8513 Barcelona province W50 (2008), W51 (2008), W52 (2008)
Singleton (1) 8514 Barcelona province W53 (2008)
Fereal Pigeons (14) ST-45 (7) 45 Barcelona W32 (2015), W36 (2015), W37 (2015), W40 (2015), W43 (2015), W44 (2015)
8512 Barcelona W47 (2015)
ST-179 (7) 179 Barcelona W33 (2015)
220 Barcelona W41 (2015)
2209 Barcelona W34 (2015), W39 (2015), W46 (2015), W48 (2015), W49 (2015)
Northern shoveler (1) Singleton (1) 996 Ebro Delta W02 (2008)
White storks (2) ST-354 (2) 354 Lleida W55 (2011), W56 (2011)

In brackets, number of strains.

Isolates were recovered from stock cultures stored at -80°C in cryovials containing Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 20% glycerol. Fresh cultures were obtained by streaking a loop of the frozen stock cultures onto blood agar plates (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France); plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h under a microaerobic atmosphere (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2; Anaerocultaaa, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

Species Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Confirmation of C. jejuni strains was performed by conventional species-specific PCR using primers targeting the lipid A gene lpxA (Klena et al., 2004) and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics). Susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial agents was assessed by the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical Laboratory and Standard Institute [M100-S26; (CLSI, 2016)] using Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (BioMérieux). The antimicrobials tested were: ampicillin (10 μg) (AMP), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg) (AMC), imipenem (10 μg) (IMP), tetracycline (30 μg) (TET), erythromycin (15 μg) (ERY), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) (CIP), nalidixic acid (30 μg) (NAL), gentamicin (10 μg) (G), streptomycin (10 μg) (S), kanamycin (30 μg) (K), chloramphenicol (30 μg) (CHL), and fosfomycin (200 μg) (FOS). The breakpoints were performed following the CLSI criteria except for TET, ERY and CIP where the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints criteria was used (Supplementary Table S1). All the clinical intermediate values were considered as resistant. The strains that showed resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents were considered as multidrug-resistant (MDR) (Schwarz et al., 2010).

Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) and Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST)

The PFGE was performed following the Standard Operating Procedure of PulseNet1 for C. jejuni. Genomic DNA was digested with SmaI and KpnI restriction enzymes (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). Electrophoresis was performed in a CHEF-DR III System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States). We performed a comparison analysis of PFGE profiles using the BioNumerics v7.6.3 software (AppliedMaths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Similarity matrices were calculated by the Dice coefficient (2% optimization and 1% position tolerance) and dendrograms were constructed using the UPGMA method using the cited BioNumerics v7.6.3 software. Strains with a similarity ≥ 95% were considered as the same pulsotype, that means there are not more than two bands of difference.

Campylobacter jejuni strains were typed by MLST according to the procedures of PubMLST2. DNA was obtained using GenEluteTM Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). Sanger sequence data were analyzed using BioNumerics v7.6.3 software. Alleles and sequence types (STs) were assigned based on the MLST scheme provided on the Campylobacter PubMLST2 database. Novel alleles and STs were submitted to the database.

To represent the relationship among Campylobacter strains, we generated a complete minimum spanning tree (MST) using the BioNumerics v7.6.3 software.

Virulence-Associated Genes Detection

The 150 C. jejuni strains were tested by PCR for the presence of 8 genes encoding putative virulence factors. These included genes related to adhesion and colonization (cadF), invasion (ciaB, virB11, htrA, and hcp), and cytotoxin production (cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC). Genomic DNA was extracted by standard procedures using the InstaGene matrix Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). PCR reactions (PCR Master Mix x2, Thermo Scientific) were performed using 35 ng of DNA as a template and the specific primers indicated in Supplementary Table S2. As internal control of the PCR reaction, primers for the amplification of the housekeeping gene gltA were included in the PCR mixtures.

Statistical Analysis

The virulence-associated genes data was analyzed using Pearson’s chi-squared test (R Studio software). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Genetic Diversity of C. jejuni Strains From the Three Different Ecological Niches

A collection of 150 C. jejuni isolates recovered from fecal samples from different ecological niches [50 isolates/each: human patients suffering gastroenteritis (H), broilers (B), and wild birds (W)] have been the focus of the study. The clonal relationship of the whole collection was determined by PFGE profiling. Four strains were non-typeable because of DNA smearing: one human (H49), one wild bird (W10), and two broiler (B24, B50) strains. As expected, a high clonal diversity was found among the 146 typeable strains. Genotyping using the SmaI restriction enzyme resulting 120 pulsotypes and 12 clones. To increase the clonal discrimination, the secondary KpnI enzyme was used (On et al., 1998). The combined analysis of SmaI and KpnI-PFGE banding patterns resulted in a wider clonal diversity with 137 pulsotypes and 4 clones (Supplementary Figure S1). The highest clonal diversity was found in the human population where no strains with the same pulsotype were found, consistent with the fact that human samples were not chosen in the context of an outbreak. By contrast, 13 strains, 6 from broilers and 7 from wild birds, were grouped in four clones (similarity ≥ 95%). Clone 1 included 6 broiler strains (B52–B57) from 2 different farms (5 from EU and 1 from CT) belonging to the same broiler company (Table 1). The five strains (B52–B56) from farm EU were recovered from broilers included in the same flock. This possible flock colonization is not a rare case and has also previously been reported by other authors (Ridley et al., 2011). Also, the recovery of the same clone in broilers from two different farms may be due to cross contamination between farms belonging to the same broiler company. Clone 2, included three strains (W06–W08) from Audouin’s gulls (Larus audouinii) sampled at Alboran Island at the same breeding season, and Clones 3 and 4, both with two strains, W43 and W44 from pigeons (Columba livia, Barcelona) and W50 and W52 from common ravens (Corvus corax) (Sabadell, Barcelona province), respectively. It is not surprising the finding of different strains from the same host species belonging to the same clone, since samples were collected from different birds belonging to the same colony during the same time period.

The remaining PFGE patterns from the three different niches were scattered along the dendrogram, although different clusters could be observed (Supplementary Figure S1). Overall, human and broiler strains frequently grouped together at different similarity levels. On the contrary, a marked host specificity was found within some specific genus of wild birds (Columba, Corvus, and Ciconia) as previously described (Griekspoor et al., 2013). Thus, pigeons’ strains were grouped in different clusters with a similarity ranging from 65 to 80%; the three ravens’ strains (two of them constitute the Clone 4) clustered with a similarity of 82% and the two storks clustered with a broiler strain with a 65% similarity. Finally, the northern shoveler strain showed low similarity (≤ 50%) with all other wild birds strains (Supplementary Figure S1). Gulls strains were scattered along the dendrogram but some clusters were also defined. Interestingly, a cluster containing strains from two different gull species had a similarity of 65%. These gulls were from different geographical locations (Medes Islands, Ebro Delta, and Alboran Island). This fact has already been described by Griekspoor et al. (2013) who found a high similarity between strains from the same or closely related bird species from different geographical areas (Sweden, Australia, and United Kingdom). Notably, the gull isolate W30 cluster together with several pigeon isolates (W32, W36, W37). Since all those isolates were recovered from birds at the same geographical area (Barcelona), these data suggest that both the gull and the pigeons have a common source of infection or it is a consequence of gulls being pigeons predators.

MLST Analysis and Population Structure

The MLST analysis corroborates the genetic diversity observed by PFGE typing among the C. jejuni strains and confirms a closer relationship between human and broiler strains.

Among the 150 strains studied, 64 different STs grouped in 21 clonal complexes (ST-complexes) and 12 singletons (S) were recognized (Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). Six novel STs were identified: ST-8479 (human), ST-8498 (broiler), ST-8511, ST-8512, ST-8513, and ST-8514 (wild birds). In this study, the ST-21 (24 strains), ST-1275 (16 strains), and ST-45 (13 strains) clonal complexes were the most frequent. Strains from the ST-1275 complex were only isolated from two different gull species. The ST-21 complex was found in humans (16 strains) and broilers (8 strains), whereas the ST-45 was found in the three environments studied. Thus, the ST-45 complex was predominant in wild birds (8 strains), followed by broilers (4 strains) and by humans (1 strain). Both, the ST-21 and ST-45 complexes are described as multihost genotypes and have been isolated from a wide variety of agricultural and environmental sources (Sopwith et al., 2006; French et al., 2009; Sheppard et al., 2011; Colles and Maiden, 2012).

Table 3.

Clonal complex (ST-complex), sequence type (ST), virulence factors profile (VF), and antimicrobial resistance profile (AMR) found in 150 C. jejuni strains from humans, broilers, and wild birds niches.

Humans
Broilers
Wild Birds
ST complexes ST VFa AMRb VF AMR VF AMR
ST-21 complex (24) 19 (1) #2 M (1)
21 (8) #2 M (1) I (2) J (1) T (1) #2 M (2) O (1)
50 (8) #2 M(4) K (1) #2 M (1) K (2)
883 (4) #2 M (1) J (1) #1 I (1)
#2 I (1)
1214 (1) #2 J (1)
3769 (1) #2 M (1)
4664 (1) #2 B (1)
ST-42 complex (2) 459 (1) #2 M (1)
4016 (1) #2 E (1)
ST-45 complex (13) 45 (10) #2 K (1) #2 M (1) G (1) #2 A (3) C (3) I (1)
137 (1) #2 P (1)
652 (1) #2 P (1)
8512 (1) #2 A (1)
ST-48 complex (3) 48 (3) #5 M (1) #9 M (1) #14 M (1)
ST-49 complex (1) 49 (1) #2 M (1)
ST-52 complex (1) 52 (1) #2 H (1)
ST-61 complex (5) 61 (5) #6 M (2) A (1) E (1)
#12 B (1)
ST-179 complex (7) 179 (1) #5 A (1)
220 (1) #3 D (1)
2209 (5) #2 A (1)
#5 A (2) C (2)
ST-206 complex (6) 46 (1) #2 M (1)
227 (1) #2 A (1)
572 (4) #5 M (4)
ST-257 complex (12) 257 (3) #2 M (1) N (1) P(1)
367 (6) #2 M (6)
2254 (3) #2 M (2) #2 I (1)
ST-283 complex (1) 267 (1) #2 M (1)
ST-353 complex (9) 5 (2) #1 I (1)
#3 I (1)
353 (1) #1 K (1)
356 (1) #2 M (1)
400 (5) #3 M (1) #3 I (3) M (1)
ST-354 complex (9) 354 (8) #2 M (2) #2 M (2) #2 M (2) I (2)
8498 (1) #2 M (1)
ST-443 complex (2) 51 (1) #2 M (1)
5799 (1) #2 M (1)
ST-446 complex (1) 3552 (1) #1 M (1)
ST-464 complex (3) 464 (3) #1 F (1) #2 M (1)
#1 M (1)
ST-574 complex (2) 305 (2) #2 M (1) I (1)
ST-607 complex (8) 607 (2) #1 M (1) I (1)
904 (3) #1 M (1) #1 M (2)
1707 (1) #1 M (1)
7110 (2) #2 M (1)
#1 I (1)
ST-952 complex (3) 8513 (3) #10 A (2) C (1)
ST-1034 complex (1) 4001 (1) #13 L (1)
ST-1275 complex (16) 637 (2) #4 A (1) B (1)
1223 (5) #4 C (1)
#7 A (2) C (1)
#15 C (1)
1268 (1) #4 B (1)
1275 (3) #4 B (2)
#8 B (1)
1292 (2) #4 C (1)
#8 C (1)
3049 (1) #4 A (1)
3629 (1) #4 E (1)
8511 (1) #4 B (1)
Singletons 441 (3) #2 R (1) #5 P (1)
#11 J (1)
531 (2) #3 M (1) #1 M (1)
996 (1) #16 A (1)
1261 (1) #2 A (1)
1343 (2) #2 A (2)
1710 (4) #1 M (1) #1 M (1) Q (1)
#3 P (1)
2331 (1) #1 M (1)
2351 (1) #2 C (1)
4355 (3) #2 A (3)
7114 (1) #2 T (1)
8479 (1) #1 M (1)
8514 (1) #7 S (1)

aThe VF profile is described in Figure 3. bThe AMR profile is described in Figure 2. virB11 positive. In brackets, number of strains.

The relationship among the three studied populations is reflected in a minimum spanning tree diagram (Figure 1). Three STs (ST-45, ST-48, and ST-354) were found in all three niches representing 14% (21/150) of the 150 studied strains. The spanning tree diagram distributes the strains in two main clusters, characterized – with some exceptions – by its ecology. The first cluster, in the left side of the Figure 1B, grouped STs from wild birds, whereas the second cluster (right side) agglutinate most human and broiler STs. This distribution clearly establishes a closer relationship between broiler and human strains, consistent with broiler meat being the most frequent source of Campylobacter human infection (EFSA-ECDC, 2016; Ramonaite et al., 2017). This can also be observed when looking at the number of STs shared among the different niches (Figure 1): 10 STs are shared between human and broiler strains, only 3 in the 3 niches, and no ST is shared among wild birds and either humans or broilers.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Minimum spanning tree showing the distribution of the C. jejuni strains. (A) The number of STs shared among the three niches was represented by a Venn-diagram. (B) Minimum spanning tree (MST) of C. jejuni sequence types (STs) based on allele numbers. Each circle corresponds to a ST, being its size proportional to the number of strains within it. The ST of each strain are indicated in different color attending to the origin of the strain: green for humans (H), red for broilers (B), and blue for wild birds (W). The thickness and the dotting of the lines indicate the distance between STs. A thicker line denotes closer distance than a thin line and a thin line denotes closer distance than a dotted line. The ST-complexes including several STs are indicated in dotted color lines. The MST analysis was carried out by BioNumerics v7.6.

From the first cluster (STs from wild birds), the ST-179 and ST-1275 complexes were mainly found in pigeons and seagulls, respectively. These data support that Campylobacter genotypes isolated from non-agricultural sources, such as wild birds, are found only rarely among broilers (Griekspoor et al., 2010). However, these clonal complexes have also been recovered from stool samples from humans with sporadic cases of gastroenteritis (Hughes et al., 2009). STs from the ST-179 complex have been isolated from environmental sources, specifically from the sand of bathing beaches in the United Kingdom, presumably ultimately coming from wild birds (Dingle et al., 2001). The ST-1275 complex has also been found in several wild bird species such as pigeons (Sheppard et al., 2009). Certain host specificity was found among the ST-complexes present in different wild birds. Hence, the ST-1275 complex was predominant in gulls, the ST-179 complex in pigeons and the ST-952 complex in ravens (Table 2).

With regards to the second cluster (STs from human and broiler strains), five ST- complexes were found as predominant (ST-21, ST-206, ST-257, ST-353, and ST-607). These clonal complexes have been previously associated with human infections, poultry, other farm animals, and environmental samples (Colles and Maiden, 2012; Cody et al., 2015; Ramonaite et al., 2017). Overall, a great diversity of ST-complexes was found among both human and broiler strains. A total of 16 STs were found in humans and 14 in broilers (Figure 1A). Strains from Clones 1, 2, 3, and 4 by PFGE belong to ST-367, ST-4355, ST-45, and ST-8513, respectively, while the remaining strains showed unrelated PFGE pattern.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested for all the isolates and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles were defined (Figure 2). In agreement with the increase in the occurrence of AMR and MDR detected in Campylobacter strains in many countries (Luangtongkum et al., 2009), a high frequency of AMR was detected among the strains of our collection. A total of 127 strains (84.6%) were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents. The highest percentage of antimicrobial resistance was found for tetracycline (71.3%), quinolones [ciprofloxacin (67.3%), nalidixic acid (64.6%)], and ampicillin (63.3%) (Figure 2A). In agreement with the genotyping data, the antimicrobial susceptibility describes important differences between wild bird strains and the clustered broiler and human strains, with the occurrence of antibiotic resistance much lower among wild bird strains. In our strain collection, 23 strains were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested. From those, 21 strains were recovered from wild birds and the other two from human samples. Moreover, the occurrence of tetracycline, quinolones, and ampicillin resistance was higher in human and broiler strains compared to wild birds. In contrast, the low occurrence resistance to aminoglycosides is shared among strains from the three niches. In our study, 7.3 and 4.6% of the strains were resistant to streptomycin and kanamycin, respectively, whereas only one strain from a human sample was resistant to gentamicin.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni studied strains. (A) Absolute and relative values of antimicrobial resistance in human (H), broiler (B), and wild bird (W) strains. Antibiotic families (Q: quinolones and A: aminoglycosides) are indicated. All strains were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, imipenem, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin. (B) Percentage of resistant strains to 0 to 4 families of antibiotics. MDR indicates multidrug-resistant strains. (C) Antimicrobial resistance profiles obtained. Asterisks indicate the MDR profiles. (D) Percentage of the different antimicrobial resistance profiles in each subgroup, as defined in (C).

The high occurrence of resistance to some antibiotics cannot be accounted to the non-therapeutic use of antimicrobial drugs in poultry production since this practice was banned in the EU in 2006. The therapeutic antibiotics used in poultry are mainly quinolones (enrofloxacin), tetracyclines (doxycycline), penicillins (amoxicillin), and macrolides (erythromycin, tylosin), which is reflected – in general – with the occurrence of antibiotic resistance detected. Also in agreement with the detected occurrence, the aminoglycosides tested (streptomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin) are not of common use for treatment of enteric diseases in poultry (Cantero et al., 2018). All strains were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, imipenem, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin. The rare occurrence of imipenem, erythromycin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistance among Campylobacter strains has been previously described (Gallay et al., 2007; Deckert et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2015). In contrast, resistance to fosfomycin has been detected in C. jejuni strains (Novoa-Farías et al., 2016) as well as to chloramphenicol in C. coli strains isolated from humans and broilers (Yang et al., 2017).

The MDR, defined as resistance to three or more families of antimicrobial agents (Schwarz et al., 2010), has increased worldwide among C. jejuni strains (Giacomelli et al., 2014). In this study, 49.3% of the strains were MDR (Figure 2B). The most frequent MDR profile (M profile, TET-NAL-CIP-AMP) was detected in 40% of the strains, being mostly identified in humans (23.3%) and broilers (23.3%) (Figures 2C,D). Only five strains from wild birds were MDR, four of them with the above mentioned M profile and one with the S profile (TET-NAL-CIP-S-K). Those MDR strains were recovered from birds with insalubrious feeding habits (feeding on refuse dumps and carrion) such as gulls, storks, and ravens (Ramos et al., 2010).

These MDR strains were included in five out of the six predominant ST-complexes found in humans and broilers (ST-21, ST-206, ST-257, ST-354, and ST-607) (Table 3). Interestingly, the percentage of MDR among strains of ST-353 complex, also defined as predominant in humans and broilers, was much lower (33.3 %). No MDR strains have been found among the two ST- complexes exclusive for wild birds (ST-179 and ST-1275). It should be highlighted that there is a high variability in the AMR profile among genetically closely related strains. For instance, within the ST-45 and ST-61, strains susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested and MDR were found. These suggest a rapid acquisition of antibiotic resistance determinants among C. jejuni strains. Accordingly, transfer of antibiotic resistance genes by mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids and transposons that can help acquisition and diffusion of drug resistance, has been described (Bennett, 2008).

Prevalence and Distribution of Virulence-Associated Genes Among the C. jejuni Strains

The presence of genes coding for putative virulence factors in the 150 C. jejuni strains have been tested by PCR. The genes detected were: (1) cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes, conforming a polycistronic operon, coding for synthesis and deliver of the cytolethal distending toxin that causes host cell cycle arrest; (2) three genes involved in adherence and invasion of host cells: cadF coding for a putative OmpA-like protein that mediates bacterial adhesion by binding to host fibronectin, ciaB coding for an invasive antigen that translocate into the cytoplasm of host cells facilitating the C. jejuni invasion, and htrA coding for a serine-protease that contributes to stress tolerance and with ability to cleave E-cadherin; (3) the hcp gene coding for a host surface adhesion protein that is a component of a type 6 secretion system (T6SS) that has been associated with virulence; and (4) the virB11, a gene located in the virulence related plasmid pVir (Bacon et al., 2002; Tracz et al., 2005; Cróinín and Backert, 2012; Bleumink-Pluym et al., 2013). The results showed a high prevalence of six out of eight genes tested (Figure 3). Remarkably, significant differences exist in the prevalence of some of the genes when comparing among the strains from different origin. A different distribution of the cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes was detected among the three subgroups of strains. The three genes were present in all the human and broiler strains whereas 46% of the wild bird strains were negative for at least one of the cdt genes (Supplementary Figure S2). The fact that many strains (23) lacked one or two of the three open reading frames (ORF) present in the polycistronic cdtABC operon is an interesting phenomenon that has been reported earlier (Bang et al., 2003; Koolman et al., 2015). Remarkably, the cdtA gene had the more uneven distribution since it was detected in all human and broilers strains, while it was only present in 58% of the wild bird strains. Among the 23 strains lacking at least one cdt gene, 14 lacked cdtA, 1 cdtB, 1 cdtC, 3 cdtAB, and 4 cdtAC. The negative PCR-amplification of one or two of the three ORF present in the cdtABC operon, when using primers designed from the 81-176 genome sequence (Supplementary Table S2), may indicate significant differences among alleles from different strains. Our results suggest that: (1) a high diversity of cdt alleles exists among C. jejuni strains found in natural environments (wild bird) and (2) the cdt alleles promoting efficient broiler colonization are much less diverse. cdtA and cdtC are involved in the binding to the target host cells allowing internalization of the cdtB toxin. Therefore, we hypothesize that different cdtA might have distinct target molecules during tissue recognition and consequently might play a relevant role defining the host susceptibility of C. jejuni strains. Interesting observations can be made when having a closer look to the phylogenetic and ecological relationships of the strains that were negative for any of the cdt genes (Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S2): (1) all 16 strains belonging to the ST-1275 complex and different PFGE pattern were cdtA negative and were isolated from the two different seagull species located in three geographically distinct colonies along the western Mediterranean coast; three of them were also cdtC-negative. From these seagulls’ colonies, cdtABC+ strains, belonging to diverse ST-complexes distinct to ST-1275, were also isolated; (2) all three strains belonging to ST-952 complex are cdtAB negative but two share the same PFGE pattern (W50 and W52), these strains were isolated from commons ravens. The other two ravens’ strains are cdtA negative (W53, singleton ST-8514) and cdtABC+ (W54, ST-354 complex), respectively; (3) the ST-48 complex includes three strains, belonging each one to a different niche, the broiler (B09) and human (H38) strains are cdtABC+ and showed different PFGE pattern, whereas the wild bird strain (W29) from a Yellow-legged gull is cdtB negative; (4) from the wild bird subgroup, all the strains from pigeons and storks, birds that are more in contact with the human population, are positive for all three cdt genes; and (5) the unique cdtC- strain belongs to the ST-1034 complex. The relevant diversity among cdtABC found among wild bird strains and the apparently highly conserved distribution among human and broiler strains might indicate that the specific sequence of certain cdt alleles can be related to the ability to colonize different hosts. Moreover, the fact that there are differences in the presence of cdt alleles among strains from the same ST-complex and/or ST indicates the high plasticity of this genetic locus (the cdtABC operon).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Virulence factors in C. jejuni studied strains. (A) Absolute and relative values of the virulence factors found in human (H), broiler (B), and wild bird (W) strains. (B) Virulence factors profiles obtained. (C) Percentages of the different virulence factors profiles in each subgroup, as defined in (B).

Regarding the genes coding for putative factors involved in host cell invasion, only cadF showed an uneven prevalence distribution among strains from the different niches. The tested cadF allele was present in all broiler and wild bird strains and in 45 out of 50 human strains. This result suggests that either some strains lack the cadF gene or carry a cadF allele with significant differences from the cadF81-176 allele chosen as template in this study (Supplementary Table S2). Interestingly, all the cadF negative strains belong to ST-61, which is often found in cattle/bovine reservoirs (Kwan et al., 2008). Our results suggest that the presence of the cadF tested may not be essential for the ability of Campylobacter to cause infection in humans. It cannot be disregarded that the five cadF- strains carry a different cadF allele not detected with the primers used (Supplementary Table S2). In a recent report studying the distribution of virulence-associated genes in a collection of 24 Campylobacter strains, cadF was detected in all C. jejuni strains whereas some C. coli from both humans and broilers were negative for this gene (Koolman et al., 2015).

No significant differences exist when comparing the prevalence of the ciaB gene among the three populations. The ciaB negative strains are the majority for certain ST-complexes such as ST-48, ST-179, ST-353, ST-206, and two singletons (ST-441, ST-1710). However, we also found ciaB negative strains belonging to ST-complex where most strains are positive for this genetic locus. Only four strains were negative for htrA, two from humans (ST-61 and ST-441), one from a broiler (ST-48), and one from a wild bird (ST-48).

The presence of the hcp gene is a hallmark of the ability of C. jejuni to express a T6SS (Lindmark et al., 2009). A functional T6SS has been identified in some C. jejuni strains, those carrying the integrative element CJIE3. Its presence had been related to the ability to infect humans and cause disease by influencing cell adhesion and cytotoxicity toward erythrocytes (Lertpiriyapong et al., 2012; Bleumink-Pluym et al., 2013; Harrison et al., 2014). Notably, the hcp gene was detected in a low proportion in all three populations. The detection frequency was in a range similar to that described in previous reports (Harrison et al., 2014; Siddiqui et al., 2015). Surprisingly, our data indicate that hcp is significantly less represented among the human strains (14%) as compared to broiler (38%) and wild bird (28%) strains (Figure 3A). Interestingly, the hcp-positive clones are mostly distributed among certain ST-complexes: ST-1275 (12 out of 16 are positive), ST-607 (7/8), ST-353 (8/9), ST-464 (2/3), and ST-446 (1/1). The differential prevalence of hcp, with lower prevalence among human strains, suggests that T6SS does not promote human infection. The last putative virulence factor encoding gene tested was virB11. Previous reports have argued on the contribution of the pVir plasmid in the virulence potential of C. jejuni (Tracz et al., 2005; Louwen et al., 2006). Among our strains the prevalence of the virB11 gene is very low since only two strains, one from human and one from broiler, were positive for the tested virB11 allele, suggesting that the pVir plasmid is not required for C. jejuni to either colonize birds or infect humans.

Virulence profiles were defined attending to the presence/absence of virulence-related genes of chromosomal location (all genes except virB11) (Figure 3). The virulence profile #2 (cadF+, cdt+, htrA+, ciaB+) is overrepresented among the collection, being detected in a 54% of the strains and being the most prevalent in all three subgroups (human, broiler and wild birds). In addition to profile #2, only three more virulence profiles (#1, #3, #5) were detected in all the three subgroups. The highest variability was found among the wild bird strains since up to 14 different profiles were identified, in contrast to human and broiler strains where five profiles were found within each subgroup. From the 14 profiles described in wild birds, 10 were only found in this subgroup. One virulence profile (#6, cdt+, cadF-, ciaB+, htrA+ hcp-) was only found among human strains, being detected in four clinical strains belonging to ST-61, but with different PFGE patterns. Moreover the profile #9 has only been detected among broiler strains.

Conclusion

In this report, a comparative study has been performed among C. jejuni strains from three different sources: humans, broilers, and wild birds from Catalonia. As expected, by PFGE a great genetic diversity was observed among all included strains, with the exception of a few clones. In our Campylobacter population, the ST-45, ST-48, and ST-354 were present in all three niches; the ST-21 complex was the predominant in human and the ST-1275 complex in wild birds, while in broilers different complexes: ST-21, ST-257, ST-353, and ST-607 were present equally. MLST analysis clearly distinguished the wild bird Campylobacter population from that of humans and chickens, suggesting that certain host specificity may exist among C. jejuni clonal complexes. The drug antimicrobial profiles show an overall high percentage of MDR strains (49%). Again, a closer relationship between human and broiler strains was detected. A similar high percentage of MDR strains (72%) was detected among human and broiler strains whereas the percentage among wild bird strains was much lower (8%). This discrepancy in MDR prevalence correlates with the differential antibiotic pressure. The broiler and human strains are under a high antibiotic pressure due to the use of antimicrobial drugs whereas the selective pressure is barely inexistent in wild bird population. The presence of several putative virulence genes have been detected by PCR. The genes cadF, ciaB, htrA, and the operon cdtABC, coding for proteins presumably involved in bacterial adherence, invasion of epithelial cells and toxin production, are highly prevalent among Campylobacter strains. Correlation between certain virulence factors profiles and specific STs has been detected, which may have ecological implications. For instance, our data indicates a great diversity in cdtA alleles among wild bird strains as compared with broiler and human strains, suggesting that colonization of specific hosts might be promoted by certain cdtA variants.

All the genotype- and phenotype-based analysis indicate that most strains isolated from wild birds form a cluster clearly differentiated from those strains isolated from broilers and humans. Nonetheless, some wild bird strains belong to clonal complexes also detected among broiler or human strains suggesting a reverse zoonosis transmission, most likely consequence of the scavenging feeding habitats of the studied birds. Overall, our report provides new insights into the distribution of circulating C. jejuni strains among different ecological niches.

Author Contributions

YI-T performed the investigation, formal analysis, and statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. PG performed the investigation, formal analysis, and statistical analysis. TL and CMu performed the conception and design of the study, and revised the manuscript. MC-C and FN performed the formal analysis, statistical analysis, conception, and design of the study, and revised the manuscript. EM, CMa, and CB performed the formal analysis, statistical analysis, conception, and design of the study, and wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Pigeon samples were kindly provided by the Barcelona Public Health Agency (ASPB).

Funding. This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant No. AGL2013-45339R), the Spanish National Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (INIA, Grant No. FAU2008-00012-C02-01 and RTA2009-00117-00-00), the Catalonian Government (Grant No. 2017SGR499), the Recercaixa Program (Grant No. 2012/ACUP/00048), and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant agreement No. 244547 (CamCon project). CERCA Program from the Generalitat de Catalunya is also acknowledged.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01676/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Ang C. W., De Klerk M. A., Endtz H. P., Jacobs B. C., Laman J. D., Van Der Meché F. G. A., et al. (2001). Guillain-Barré syndrome- and Miller Fisher syndrome-associated Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides induce anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies in rabbits. Infect. Immun. 69 2462–2469. 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2462-2469.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacon D. J., Alm R. A., Hu L., Hickey T. E., Ewing C. P., Batchelor R. A., et al. (2002). DNA sequence and mutational analyses of the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect. Immun. 70 6242–6250. 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6242-6250.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bang D. D., Nielsen E. M., Scheutz F., Pedersen K., Handberg K., Madsen M. (2003). PCR detection of seven virulence and toxin genes of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from Danish pigs and cattle and cytolethal distending toxin production of the isolates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94 1003–1014. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01926.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett P. (2008). Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 153 347–357. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bleumink-Pluym N. M., Van Alphen L. B., Bouwman L. I., Wösten M. M. S. M., van Putten J. P. M. (2013). Identification of a functional type VI secretion system in Campylobacter jejuni conferring capsule polysaccharide sensitive cytotoxicity. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003393. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolinger H., Kathariou S. (2017). The current state of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter spp: trends and impacts of resistance mechanisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83:e00416-17. 10.1128/AEM.00416-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantero G., Correa-Fiz F., Ronco T., Strube M., Cerdà-Cuellar M., Pedersen K. (2018). Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli broiler isolates by whole-genome sequencing. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 15 145–152. 10.1089/fpd.2017.2325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CLSI (2016). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing CLSI Supplement M100S. Wayne, PA: CLSI. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cody A. J., Mccarthy N. D., Bray J. E., Wimalarathna H. M. L., Colles F. M., Jansen Van Rensburg M. J., et al. (2015). Wild bird-associated Campylobacter jejuni isolates are a consistent source of human disease, in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7 782–788. 10.1111/1758-2229.12314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cody A. J., Mccarthy N. M., Wimalarathna H. L., Colles F. M., Clark L., Bowler I. C. J. W., et al. (2012). A longitudinal 6-year study of the molecular epidemiology of clinical Campylobacter isolates in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50 3193–3201. 10.1128/JCM.01086-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colles F. M., Maiden M. C. J. (2012). Campylobacter sequence typing databases: applications and future prospects. Microbiology 158 2695–2709. 10.1099/mic.0.062000-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cróinín O. T., Backert S. (2012). Host epithelial cell invasion by Campylobacter jejuni: trigger or zipper mechanism? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2:25 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dasti J. I., Tareen A. M., Lugert R., Zautner A. E., Gross U. (2010). Campylobacter jejuni: a brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and disease-mediating mechanisms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300 205–211. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Deckert A., Valdivieso-Garcia A., Reid-Smith R., Tamblyn S., Seliske P., Irwin R., et al. (2010). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from retail chicken in two health units in Ontario. J. Food Prot. 73 1317–1324. 10.4315/0362-028X-73.7.1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng F., Shen J., Zhang M., Wu C., Zhang Q., Wang Y. (2015). Constitutive and inducible expression of the rRNA methylase gene erm(B) in Campylobacter. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59 6661–6664. 10.1128/AAC.01103-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dingle K. E., Colles F. M., Wareing D. R. A., Ure R., Fox A. J., Bolton F. E., et al. (2001). Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39 14–23. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duarte A., Seliwiorstow T., Miller W. G., De Zutter L., Uyttendaele M., Dierick K., et al. (2016). Discriminative power of Campylobacter phenotypic and genotypic typing methods. J. Microbiol. Methods 125 33–39. 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Eberle K. N., Kiess A. S. (2012). Phenotypic and genotypic methods for typing Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in poultry. Poult. Sci. 91 255–264. 10.3382/ps.2011-01414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. EFSA-ECDC (2016). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J. 14:4634. 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Engberg J. (2006). Contributions to the epidemiology of Campylobacter infections. A review of clinical and microbiological studies. Dan. Med. Bull. 53 361–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. French N. P., Midwinter A., Holland B., Collins-Emerson J., Pattison R., Colles F., et al. (2009). Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from wild-bird fecal material in children’s playgrounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 779–783. 10.1128/AEM.01979-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gallay A., Prouzet-Mauléon V., Kempf I., Lehours P., Labadi L., Camou C., et al. (2007). Campylobacter antimicrobial drug resistance among humans, broiler chickens, and pigs, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13 259–266. 10.3201/eid1302.060587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Giacomelli M., Salata C., Martini M., Montesissa C., Piccirillo A. (2014). Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from poultry in Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 20 181–188. 10.1089/mdr.2013.0110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Griekspoor P., Colles F. M., McCarthy N. D., Hansbro P. M., Ashhurst-Smith C., Olsen B., et al. (2013). Marked host specificity and lack of phylogeographic population structure of Campylobacter jejuni in wild birds. Mol. Ecol. 22 1463–1472. 10.1111/mec.12144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Griekspoor P., Engvall E. O., Olsen B., Waldenström J. (2010). Multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter jejuni from broilers. Vet. Microbiol. 140 180–185. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guerrant R. L., Gilder T., Van Steiner T. S., Thielman N. M., Slutsker L., Tauxe R. V., et al. (2001). Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32 331–350. 10.1086/318514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrison J. W., Dung T. T. N., Siddiqui F., Korbrisate S., Bukhari H., Vu Tra M. P., et al. (2014). Identification of possible virulence marker from Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 1026–1029. 10.3201/eid2006.130635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Harvala H., Rosendal T., Lahti E., Engvall E. O., Brytting M., Wallensten A., et al. (2016). Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in Sweden, November 2011-October 2012: is the severity of infection associated with C. jejuni sequence type? Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 6:31079. 10.3402/iee.v6.31079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Havelaar A. H., Kirk M. D., Torgerson P. R., Gibb H. J., Hald T., Lake R. J., et al. (2015). World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 12:e1001923. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hughes L. A., Bennett M., Coffey P., Elliott J., Jones T. R., Jones R. C., et al. (2009). Molecular epidemiology and characterization of Campylobacter spp. isolated from wild bird populations in northern england. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 3007–3015. 10.1128/AEM.02458-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaakoush N. O., Castaño-Rodríguez N., Mitchell H. M., Man S. M. (2015). Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28 687–720. 10.1128/CMR.00006-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Klena J. D., Parker C. T., Knibb K., Claire Ibbitt J., Devane P. M. L., Horn S. T., et al. (2004). Differentiation of Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter upsaliensis by a multiplex PCR developed from the nucleotide sequence of the lipid A gene lpxA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42 5549–5557. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5549-5557.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Koolman L., Whyte P., Burgess C., Bolton D. (2015). Distribution of virulence-associated genes in a selection of Campylobacter isolates. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 12 424–432. 10.1089/fpd.2014.1883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kwan P. S., Birtles A., Bolton F. J., French N. P., Robinson S. E., Newbold L. S., et al. (2008). Longitudinal study of the molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni in cattle on dairy farms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74 3626–3633. 10.1128/AEM.01669-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lertpiriyapong K., Gamazon E. R., Feng Y., Park D. S., Pang J., Botka G., et al. (2012). Campylobacter jejuni type VI secretion system: roles in adaptation to deoxycholic acid, host cell adherence, invasion, and in vivo colonization. PLoS One 7:e42842. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim S.-K., Moon D.-C., Chae M. H., Kim H. J., Nam H.-M., Kim S.-R., et al. (2016). Macrolide resistance mechanisms and virulence factors in erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter species isolated from chicken and swine feces and carcasses. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 78 1791–1795. 10.1292/jvms.16-0307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lindmark B., Rompikuntal P. K., Vaitkevicius K., Song T., Mizunoe Y., Uhlin B. E., et al. (2009). Outer membrane vesicle-mediated release of cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) from Campylobacter jejuni. BMC Microbiol. 9:220. 10.1186/1471-2180-9-220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Louwen R. P. L., Van Belkum A., Wagenaar J. A., Doorduyn Y., Achterberg R., Endtz H. P. (2006). Lack of association between the presence of the pVir plasmid and bloody diarrhea in Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44 1867–1868. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1867-1868.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Luangtongkum T., Jeon B., Han J., Plummer P., Logue C. M., Zhang Q. (2009). Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter: emergence, transmission and persistence. Future Microbiol. 4 189–200. 10.2217/17460913.4.2.189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moore J., Corcoran D., Dooley J., Lucey B. (2005). Campylobacter. Vet. Res. 36 351–382. 10.1051/vetres:2005012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Novoa-Farías O., Frati-Munari C., Peredo M., Flores-Juárez S., Novoa-García O., Galicia-Tapia J., et al. (2016). Susceptibilidad de las bacterias aisladas de infecciones gastrointestinales agudas a la rifaximina y otros agentes antimicrobianos en México. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. 81 3–10. 10.1016/j.rgmx.2015.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. On S. L. W., Nielsen E. M., Engberg J., Madsen M. (1998). Validity of SmaI-defined genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni examined by SalI, KpnI, and BamHI polymorphisms: evidence of identical clones infecting humans, poultry, and cattle. Epidemiol. Infect. 120 231–237. 10.1017/S0950268898008668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pascoe B., Méric G., Murray S., Yahara K., Mageiros L., Bowen R., et al. (2015). Enhanced biofilm formation and multi-host transmission evolve from divergent genetic backgrounds in Campylobacter jejuni. Environ. Microbiol. 17 4779–4789. 10.1111/1462-2920.13051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ramonaite S., Tamuleviciene E., Alter T., Kasnauskyte N., Malakauskas M. (2017). MLST genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from broiler products, dairy cattle and human campylobacteriosis cases in Lithuania. BMC Infect. Dis. 17:430. 10.1186/s12879-017-2535-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ramos R., Cerdà-Cuéllar M., Ramírez F., Jover L., Ruiz X. (2010). Influence of refuse sites on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars in seagulls. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76 3052–3056. 10.1128/AEM.02524-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ridley A. M., Morris V. K., Cawthraw S. A., Ellis-Iversen J., Harris J. A., Kennedy E. M., et al. (2011). Longitudinal molecular epidemiological study of thermophilic campylobacters on one conventional broiler chicken farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 98–107. 10.1128/AEM.01388-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwarz S., Silley P., Simjee S., Woodford N., Van Duijkeren E., Johnson A. P., et al. (2010). Editorial: assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65 601–604. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheppard S. K., Colles F. M., McCarthy N. D., Strachan N. J. C., Ogden I. D., Forbes K. J., et al. (2011). Niche segregation and genetic structure of Campylobacter jejuni populations from wild and agricultural host species. Mol. Ecol. 20 3484–3490. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05179.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheppard S. K., Dallas J. F., Macrae M., Mccarthy N. D., Gormley F. J., Strachan N. J. C., et al. (2009). Europe PMC funders group Campylobacter genotypes from food animals, environmental sources and clinical disease in Scotland 2005 / 6. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 134 96–103. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Siddiqui F., Champion O., Akram M., Studholme D., Eqani S. A., Wren B. W., et al. (2015). Molecular detection identified a type six secretion system in Campylobacter jejuni from various sources but not from human cases. J. Appl. Microbiol. 118 1191–1198. 10.1111/jam.12748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sopwith W., Birtles A., Matthews M., Fox A., Gee S., Painter M., et al. (2006). Campylobacter jejuni multilocus sequence types in humans, Northwest England, 2003-2004. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12 1500–1507. 10.3201/eid1210.060048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Thépault A., Méric G., Rivoal K., Pascoe B., Mageiros L., Touzain F., et al. (2017). Genome-wide identification of host-segregating epidemiological markers for source attribution in Campylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83:e03085-16. 10.1128/AEM.03085-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tracz D. M., Keelan M., Ahmed-Bentley J., Gibreel A., Kowalewska-Grochowska K., Taylor D. E. (2005). pVir and bloody diarrhea in Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11 838–843. 10.3201/eid1106.041052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. van Doorn P., Ruts L., Jacobs B. C. (2008). Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 7 939–950. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Workman S. N., Mathison G. E., Marc C., Lavoie M. C. (2005). Pet dogs and chicken meat as reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. in Barbados. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43 2642–2650. 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yahara K., Méric G., Taylor A. J., de Vries S. P. W., Murray S., Pascoe B., et al. (2017). Genome-wide association of functional traits linked with Campylobacter jejuni survival from farm to fork. Environ. Microbiol. 19 361–380. 10.11/1462-2920.13628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang W., Zhang M., Zhou J., Pang L., Wang G., Hou F. (2017). The molecular mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical Campylobacter jejuni and their genotyping characteristics in Beijing, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 14 386–392. 10.1089/fpd.2016.2223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Young K. T., Davis L. M., Dirita V. J. (2007). Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5 665–679. 10.1038/nrmicro1718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES