The Latin American Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak had a major impact on reproductive health worldwide. The reasons for the massively increased reports of neonatal microcephaly in northeastern Brazil are still unclear. Beyond the technical limitations of laboratory diagnostics, unambiguous diagnosis of ZIKV as the cause of congenital malformations is hampered by similar clinical pictures elicited by other pathogens known as TORCH pathogens. We performed a case-control study comparing mothers of children with congenital malformations to age-matched controls from Salvador, Brazil, one of the areas most extensively affected by the ZIKV outbreak. The ZIKV and Chikungunya virus seroprevalence rates differed significantly, whereas the levels of maternal exposure to TORCH pathogens were similar between cases and controls. Our data support a link between maternal ZIKV infection and congenital malformations and suggest the occurrence of predominantly vector-borne ZIKV transmission in these cases. In addition, some highly prevalent TORCH pathogens may be misinterpreted as representative of ongoing ZIKV activity in the absence of exhaustive diagnostics in northeastern Brazil.
KEYWORDS: Brazil, TORCH, Zika virus, microcephaly, parturient
ABSTRACT
The Latin American 2015–2016 Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak was associated with an increase in microcephaly predominantly in northeastern Brazil. To comparatively investigate infectious causes of congenital malformations, we performed a nested case-control study in 32 mothers of cases of suspected congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) and 160 age-matched controls from Bahia, northeastern Brazil. We collected clinical and imaging data and assessed past exposure to ZIKV, Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), dengue virus, and 8 established TORCH (Toxoplasma gondii, Treponema pallidum, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus 1 [HSV-1] and HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, parvovirus B19) pathogens using multiple serological tests. Heterogeneous symptoms prevented unequivocal diagnosis of CZS on clinical grounds. Only ZIKV and CHIKV seroprevalence rates differed significantly between cases and controls (93.8% versus 67.8% for ZIKV [Fisher’s exact text, P = 0.002] and 20.7% versus 8.2% for CHIKV [χ2, P = 0.039]). High ZIKV seroprevalence rates in cases could not be explained by previous dengue virus infections potentially eliciting cross-reactive antibody responses affecting ZIKV serological tests. In conditional logistic regression analyses, only ZIKV was significantly associated with congenital malformations (P = 0.030; odds ratio, 4.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 14.1]). Our data support an association between maternal ZIKV exposure and congenital malformations. Parallels between the discrepant ZIKV and CHIKV seroprevalence rates between cases and controls and similar seroprevalence rates between cases and controls for the sexually transmitted T. pallidum and HSV-2 may suggest the occurrence of predominantly vector-borne transmission in our study population. High seroprevalence of TORCH pathogens suggests that exhaustive diagnostics will be necessary in the aftermath of the ZIKV outbreak and provides baseline data for longitudinal studies on ZIKV pathogenesis.
IMPORTANCE The Latin American Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak had a major impact on reproductive health worldwide. The reasons for the massively increased reports of neonatal microcephaly in northeastern Brazil are still unclear. Beyond the technical limitations of laboratory diagnostics, unambiguous diagnosis of ZIKV as the cause of congenital malformations is hampered by similar clinical pictures elicited by other pathogens known as TORCH pathogens. We performed a case-control study comparing mothers of children with congenital malformations to age-matched controls from Salvador, Brazil, one of the areas most extensively affected by the ZIKV outbreak. The ZIKV and Chikungunya virus seroprevalence rates differed significantly, whereas the levels of maternal exposure to TORCH pathogens were similar between cases and controls. Our data support a link between maternal ZIKV infection and congenital malformations and suggest the occurrence of predominantly vector-borne ZIKV transmission in these cases. In addition, some highly prevalent TORCH pathogens may be misinterpreted as representative of ongoing ZIKV activity in the absence of exhaustive diagnostics in northeastern Brazil.
OBSERVATION
During the 2015–2016 Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak, a 20-fold increase in the incidence of neonatal microcephaly was observed after the large first epidemic wave in northeastern Brazil (1–3). In addition to microcephaly, ZIKV causes other fetal abnormalities summarized as congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), including skull and brain deformities, ocular abnormalities, arthrogryposis, and spasticity (4).
Despite the experimental evidence supporting ZIKV neuropathogenicity (5, 6), proving the etiologic role of ZIKV in neonates with neurological malformations is challenging. Laboratory diagnosis of ZIKV is hampered by the low sensitivity and specificity of virological tests (7). In addition, teratogenic substances and genetic disorders (8), as well as several pathogens other than ZIKV, can cause similar clinical presentations in fetuses and neonates (9, 10). These pathogens, grouped under the acronym TORCH, include, among others, Toxoplasma gondii, Listeria monocytogenes, Treponema pallidum, rubella virus (RUBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and parvovirus B19 (PV-B19) (9).
In Brazil, routine antenatal screening is mainly performed for T. pallidum and T. gondii. In cases of suspected congenital malformations, additional laboratory testing is performed but usually does not include all TORCH pathogens. Additionally, usage of different methods hinders comparisons of laboratory results for these pathogens across sites. Information on TORCH pathogens and their potential association with suspected cases of ZIKV-associated congenital malformations is thus scarce. In Brazil, a case-control study performed in Recife reported no statistically significant difference in the levels of maternal exposure to RUBV, CMV, and T. gondii in 32 cases of suspected CZS and 64 controls (11). Additionally, cohort studies in the Caribbean and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, failed to observe fetal abnormalities in 11 combined cases of ZIKV coinfections with HIV-1, CMV, T. gondii, or T. pallidum (12, 13). In contrast, a cohort study performed in São Paulo, Brazil, reported one case of ZIKV coinfection with T. gondii with abnormal neuroimaging findings (14). TORCH pathogens may be overlooked as causes of congenital malformations attributed to ZIKV during the outbreak or unrecognized cofactors of suspected CZS or may impact clinical presentations in cases of suspected CZS in northeastern Brazil.
To investigate exposure to the emerging arboviruses ZIKV and CHIKV in comparison to exposure to established TORCH pathogens, we conducted exhaustive serological investigations in 32 mothers of children born with congenital malformations (termed cases) and 160 mothers of children born without congenital malformations (termed controls) from a highly ZIKV-affected region in northeastern Brazil (1). For every case, 5 controls were matched by age (±2.0 years). The resulting age distributions of cases (mean, 26.8 years; standard deviation [SD], 6.6) and controls (mean, 28.9 years; SD, 6.6) did not differ significantly (t test, P = 0.09). Beyond age, data on education and ethnicity were available for around 70% of cases and controls. The study comprised mainly mixed-race individuals (80.0% of cases and 92.2% of controls; χ2, P = 0.066) with completed secondary schooling (85.7% of cases and 92.2% of controls; Fisher’s exact test; P = 0.402).
All cases showed abnormal but heterogeneous clinical and neuroimaging findings, preventing unequivocal diagnosis of suspected CZS based on clinical presentation (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Common findings included microcephaly (81.3%; 26/32) followed by intracranial calcifications (75.0%; 24/32), ventriculomegaly (56.3%; 18/32), dysgenesis of the corpus callosum (28.1%; 9/32), and Dandy-Walker-like malformations (18.8%; 6/32). Hydranencephaly, porencephaly, and hydrocephalus (66.6%; 4/6), severe intracranial calcifications (66.6%; 4/6), and reduction of encephalic mass (50.0%; 3/6) were reported from 6 cases classified as suspected CZS despite normal head circumference at birth, consistent with a recent case series from the Caribbean (15).
The difference in ZIKV seroprevalence rates between cases (93.8%) and controls (67.8%) was statistically significant (Fisher’s exact text, P = 0.002, power = 93.9%). A similar discrepancy was observed for CHIKV seroprevalence rates between cases (20.7%) and controls (8.2%; χ2, P = 0.039, power = 53.0%), suggesting higher exposure of cases to these vector-transmitted pathogens. Nonetheless, only ZIKV was significantly associated with congenital malformations in conditional logistic regression analyses (P = 0.030; odds ratio, 4.0 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1 to 14.1]). High ZIKV seroprevalence in cases was unlikely to be explained by potential cross-reactive antibodies affecting ZIKV serological tests elicited by previous dengue virus (DENV) infections, because DENV seroprevalence was higher in controls (89.1%) than in cases (74.1%; χ2, P = 0.1). Seroprevalence of TORCH pathogens in cases and controls ranged from very high (87.5% to 97.5%) for HSV-1, RUBV, VZV, and CMV to moderate (28.1% to 59.4%) for Chlamydia trachomatis, Bordetella pertussis, T. gondii, PV-B19, and HSV-2 and low (0.0% to 1.3%) for T. pallidum, and no significant differences were found between groups (Fig. 1) (Table 1).
TABLE 1 .
Pathogen | Seroprevalence cases (%) |
95% CIa | Seroprevalence controls (%) |
95% CI | Odds ratiob |
95% CI | Pd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIKV | 93.8 | 78.8–99.3 | 67.8 | 59.9–74.8 | 7.1c | 1.6–31.1 | 0.002 |
CHIKV | 20.7 | 9.5–38.8 | 8.2 | 5.2–14.8 | 2.9c | 1.0–8.4 | 0.039 |
DENV | 74.1 | 55.1–87.1 | 89.1 | 79.2–95.6 | 0.3 | 0.0–1.0 | 0.100 |
RUBV | 90.6 | 75.0–97.5 | 97.5 | 93.5–99.2 | 0.2 | 0.0–1.2 | 0.092 |
HSV-1 | 93.8 | 78.8–99.3 | 95.0 | 90.3–97.6 | 0.8 | 0.1–3.9 | 0.673 |
HSV-2 | 28.1 | 15.4–45.5 | 47.1 | 32.1–47.1 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.4 | 0.230 |
VZV | 87.5 | 71.3–95.6 | 94.4 | 89.5–97.2 | 0.4 | 0.1–1.5 | 0.236 |
CMV | 96.9 | 82.9–100.0 | 96.9 | 92.7–99.0 | 1.0 | 0.1–8.9 | 1.000 |
PV-B19 | 31.3 | 17.8–48.7 | 35.6 | 28.6–43.3 | 0.8 | 0.4–1.8 | 0.635 |
C. trachomatis | 46.9 | 30.9–63.6 | 48.1 | 40.5–55.8 | 0.9 | 0.4–2.0 | 0.897 |
B. pertussis | 56.3 | 39.3–71.9 | 59.4 | 51.8–66.7 | 0.9 | 0.4–1.9 | 0.742 |
T. pallidum | 0.0 | 0.0–9.3 | 1.3 | 0.0–4.7 | 0.9 | 0.0–20.8 | 1.000 |
T. gondii | 53.1 | 36.5–69.1 | 58.7 | 51.0–66.1 | 0.8 | 0.4–1.7 | 0.556 |
CI, confidence interval.
Data represent results from bivariate comparisons.
In conditional logistic regression analyses, odds ratios were as follows: ZIKV (P = 0.030; odds ratio, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.1 to 14.1]) and CHIKV (P = 0.084; odds ratio, 2.8 [95% CI, 0.1 to 9.2]).
Data were calculated using χ2 tests and Fisher’s exact tests when any cell count was below 5. Bold type denotes statistical significance.
Seroprevalence rates from our study were consistent with previous studies showing high (87.8%) VZV seroprevalence (16), moderate (64.9%) T. gondii seroprevalence (17), and low (2.8%) T. pallidum seroprevalence (18) in northeastern Brazilian adult women, suggesting robustness of our results. In the Zika case-control study performed in Recife, northeastern Brazil, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in cases and controls was 44% to 53% and thus was not significantly different from the range seen in our study (χ2, P > 0.05) (11). However, the seroprevalence rates of CMV (88% to 76%) and RUBV (63% to 76%) were lower in both cases and controls from Recife than in our study (Table 1; χ2, P < 0.05) (11). These differences might be explained by variations in study designs, regional differences, and differential performance of the diagnostic assays used in routine antenatal screening compared to our targeted serological investigation. Of note, since the Brazilian health system performs routine vaccination for VZV, RUBV, and B. pertussis, we cannot differentiate immune responses elicited by vaccination from those elicited by infection with wild-type pathogens (19).
The factors underlying the increase in potentially ZIKV-associated microcephaly cases in northeastern Brazil remain unclear. Since Bahia and several other northeastern Brazilian states are among the poorest regions of Brazil, poverty may be a general and yet unspecific effect modifier of ZIKV-associated microcephaly (1). The similarities in ZIKV and CHIKV seroprevalence patterns suggest a relatively higher exposure of cases to the main mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti. This may be potentially associated with lower socioeconomic status, implying residence in more densely populated areas with less-regular garbage recollection, providing enhanced availability of virus for mosquito vectors and higher mosquito density. This hypothesis is consistent with area-level analyses of socioeconomic factors affecting ZIKV exposure in Bahia (1) and affecting occurrence of cases of microcephaly in Recife (20).
Sexual ZIKV transmission has been previously described (21) and may play an important role in ZIKV congenital pathogenesis. However, similar levels of exposure of cases and controls to sexually transmitted infections suggest predominantly vector-borne ZIKV transmission in our study population. Of note, our results cannot be extrapolated to other geographical settings, since prevalence rates of TORCH pathogens and ZIKV might differ considerably between regions. Studies comparing levels of ZIKV seroprevalence in groups of sexually active and non-sexually active populations and in different social strata would be desirable to assess the significance of sexual ZIKV transmission per site.
Our study was limited by lack of routine screening for genetic and environmental causes of congenital malformations and by the absence of samples longitudinally collected from mothers during pregnancy and from neonates after birth, which hindered definite distinction between lifetime exposure and acute maternal infection during pregnancy potentially leading to congenital infection of the fetus. The strengths of our study included the exhaustive screening performed in an age-matched cohort, usage of only one test for TORCH pathogens to minimize biases that could distort test accuracy and reproducibility (22), and usage of multiple serological methods to accurately detect arbovirus exposure.
Our data strongly support ZIKV infection as a cause of severe congenital malformations in northeastern Brazil. Our baseline data for TORCH pathogens will inform subsequent epidemiological studies investigating ZIKV pathogenesis and the apparent accumulation of congenital malformations observed in northeastern Brazil (23). High TORCH seroprevalence rates suggest frequent exposure to TORCH pathogens in northeastern Brazil that must not be interpreted as evidence for ongoing ZIKV activity in the region without exhaustive diagnostics.
Study population.
The nested case-control study encompassed 32 mothers of children born with congenital malformations and 160 mothers of children born without congenital malformations attending the University of Bahia Climério de Oliveira maternity ward. The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Board under protocol no. 1.408.49. Cases and controls were sampled at the time of delivery during the same time period between May 2015 and October 2016. All patients who were attended to during the study period accepted participation in the protocol. Microcephaly cases were identified when the measurement of the cephalic circumference was 2 standard deviations below that of the corresponding gestational age, based on intergrowth charts from the World Health Organization in addition to clinical and imaging data (Table S1) (24).
Serology.
Commercially available IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for ZIKV and CHIKV were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). Due to potential cross-reactivity of ZIKV- and DENV-specific antibodies in serological assays (1), 50% plaque-reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50) were done for ZIKV as described previously (7). Only study participants who yielded positive ZIKV test results in both ELISA and PRNT50 were considered ZIKV positive. To test for exposure to the endemic DENV, we performed an in-house competitive ELISA that uses a mutant envelope antigen of DENV designed to be robust against cross-reactivity with ZIKV-specific antibodies, as previously described (25). Due to insufficient sample volumes, only 27 cases and 135 corresponding controls matched 1:5 were tested against DENV. Testing for TORCH pathogens was done using a commercially available immunoblot test (Euroline [anti-TO.R.C.H.-10 profile]; Euroimmun) which detects IgG antibodies against T. gondii, RUBV, CMV, HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, PV-B19, and T. pallidum (the classical TORCH pathogens) as well as Bordetella pertussis and Chlamydia trachomatis (which cause severe disease in neonates). Automated readout of scanned immunoblots was performed using EUROLineScan software (Euroimmun).
Statistical analyses.
Bivariate analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and conditional logistic regression with forward exclusion of variables in SPSS V23 (IBM, Ehningen, Germany) using the variables with P values of <0.05 in bivariate analyses, and power was calculated using OpenEpi 3.01. Statistics were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jens Miguel Warnecke.
This work was supported by the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF) through the ZIKApath project, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the ZIKAlliance project (grant agreement no. 734548), the German Research Foundation (DFG), and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin. We declare that we have no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Netto EM, Moreira-Soto A, Pedroso C, Höser C, Funk S, Kucharski AJ, Rockstroh A, Kümmerer BM, Sampaio GS, Luz E, Vaz SN, Dias JP, Bastos FA, Cabral R, Kistemann T, Ulbert S, de Lamballerie X, Jaenisch T, Brady OJ, Drosten C, Sarno M, Brites C, Drexler JF. 2017. High Zika virus seroprevalence in Salvador, northeastern Brazil limits the potential for further outbreaks. mBio 8:01390-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01390-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Oliveira WK, de França GVA, Carmo EH, Duncan BB, de Souza Kuchenbecker R, Schmidt MI. 2017. Infection-related microcephaly after the 2015 and 2016 Zika virus outbreaks in Brazil: a surveillance-based analysis. Lancet 390:861–870. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31368-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rodrigues LC, Paixao ES. 2017. Risk of Zika-related microcephaly: stable or variable? Lancet 390:824–826. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31478-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, Fonseca EB, Ribeiro EM, Ventura LO, Neto NN, Arena JF, Rasmussen SA. 2017. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr 171:288–295. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li C, Xu D, Ye Q, Hong S, Jiang Y, Liu X, Zhang N, Shi L, Qin CF, Xu Z. 2016. Zika virus disrupts neural progenitor development and leads to microcephaly in mice. Cell Stem Cell 19:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Noronha Ld, Zanluca C, Azevedo ML, Luz KG, Santos CN. 2016. Zika virus damages the human placental barrier and presents marked fetal neurotropism. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 111:287–293. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760160085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moreira-Soto A, Sarno M, Pedroso C, Netto EM, Rockstroh A, Luz E, Feldmann M, Fischer C, Bastos FA, Kümmerer BM, de Lamballerie X, Drosten C, Ulbert S, Brites C, Drexler JF. 2017. Evidence for congenital Zika virus infection from neutralizing antibody titers in maternal sera, northeastern Brazil. J Infect Dis 216:1501–1504. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shepard TH. 1982. Detection of human teratogenic agents. J Pediatr 101:810–815. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80338-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Coyne CB, Lazear HM. 2016. Zika virus—reigniting the TORCH. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:707–715. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Levine D, Jani JC, Castro-Aragon I, Cannie M. 2017. How does imaging of congenital Zika compare with imaging of other TORCH infections? Radiology 285:744–761. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Araujo TV, Rodrigues LC, de Alencar Ximenes RA, de Barros Miranda-Filho D, Montarroyos UR, de Melo AP, Valongueiro S, de Albuquerque MF, Souza WV, Braga C, Filho SP, Cordeiro MT, Vazquez E, Cruz DDCS, Henriques CM, Bezerra LC, da Silva Castanha PM, Dhalia R, Marques-Junior ET, Martelli CM, Investigators from the Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Pan American Health Organization, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, State Health Department of Pernambuco . 2016. Association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil, January to May, 2016: preliminary report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:1356–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoen B, Schaub B, Funk AL, Ardillon V, Boullard M, Cabié A, Callier C, Carles G, Cassadou S, Césaire R, Douine M, Herrmann-Storck C, Kadhel P, Laouénan C, Madec Y, Monthieux A, Nacher M, Najioullah F, Rousset D, Ryan C, Schepers K, Stegmann-Planchard S, Tressières B, Voluménie JL, Yassinguezo S, Janky E, Fontanet A. 2018. Pregnancy outcomes after ZIKV infection in French territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med 378:985–994. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, Rabello RS, Valderramos SG, Halai UA, Salles TS, Zin AA, Horovitz D, Daltro P, Boechat M, Raja Gabaglia C, Carvalho de Sequeira P, Pilotto JH, Medialdea-Carrera R, Cotrim da Cunha D, Abreu de Carvalho LM, Pone M, Machado Siqueira A, Calvet GA, Rodrigues Baião AE, Neves ES, Nassar de Carvalho PR, Hasue RH, Marschik PB, Einspieler C, Janzen C, Cherry JD, Bispo de Filippis AM, Nielsen-Saines K. 2016. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med 375:2321–2334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nogueira ML, Nery Júnior NRR, Estofolete CF, Bernardes Terzian AC, Guimarães GF, Zini N, Alves da Silva R, Dutra Silva GC, Junqueira Franco LC, Rahal P, Bittar C, Carneiro B, Vasconcelos PFC, Freitas Henriques D, Barbosa DMU, Lopes Rombola P, de Grande L, Negri Reis AF, Palomares SA, Wakai Catelan M, Cruz LEAA, Necchi SH, Mendonça RCV, Penha dos Santos IN, Alavarse Caron SB, Costa F, Bozza FA, Soares de Souza A, Brandão de Mattos CC, de Mattos LC, Vasilakis N, Oliani AH, Vaz Oliani DCM, Ko AI. 2018. Adverse birth outcomes associated with Zika virus exposure during pregnancy in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:646–652. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schaub B, Gueneret M, Jolivet E, Decatrelle V, Yazza S, Gueye H, Monthieux A, Juve M-L, Gautier M, Najioullah F, Vouga M, Voluménie J-L, Baud D. 2017. Ultrasound imaging for identification of cerebral damage in congenital Zika virus syndrome: a case series. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 1:45–55. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clemens SA, Azevedo T, Fonseca JC, Silva AC, Silveira TR, Clemens R. 1999. Soroepidemiology of varicella in Brazil—results of a prospective cross-sectional study. J Pediatr 75:433–441. doi: 10.2223/JPED.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mitsuka-Breganó R, Lopes-Mori F, Navarro I. 2010. Toxoplasmose adquirida na gestação e congênita: vigilância em saúde, diagnóstico, tratamento e condutas, p 5–9. In Epidemiologia e impacto da toxoplasmose congênita. EDUEL, Londrina, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moura AA, Mello MJGd, Correia JB. 2015. Prevalence of syphilis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus infections and coinfections during prenatal screening in an urban northeastern Brazilian population. Int J Infect Dis 39:10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Secretaria-de-Vigilância-em-Saúde 2015. Boletim Epidemiológico-Programa Nacional de Imunizações: aspectos históricos dos calendários de vacinação e avanços dos indicadores de coberturas vacinais, no período de 1980 a 2013, 46 http://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2015/outubro/14/besvs-pni-v46-n30.pdf.
- 20.Souza AI, de Siqueira MT, Ferreira ALCG, de Freitas CU, Bezerra ACV, Ribeiro AG, Nardocci AC. 2018. Geography of microcephaly in the Zika era: a study of newborn distribution and socio-environmental indicators in Recife, Brazil, 2015–2016. Public Health Rep 133:461–471. doi: 10.1177/0033354918777256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paz-Bailey G, Rosenberg ES, Doyle K, Munoz-Jordan J, Santiago GA, Klein L, Perez-Padilla J, Medina FA, Waterman SH, Gubern CG, Alvarado LI, Sharp TM. 2017. Persistence of Zika virus in body fluids—preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2017. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mower WR. 1999. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports. Ann Emerg Med 33:85–91. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70422-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jaenisch T, Rosenberger KD, Brito C, Brady O, Brasil P, Marques ET. 2017. Risk of microcephaly after Zika virus infection in Brazil, 2015 to 2016. Bull World Health Organ 95:191–198. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.178608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Victora CG, Schuler-Faccini L, Matijasevich A, Ribeiro E, Pessoa A, Barros FC. 2016. Microcephaly in Brazil: how to interpret reported numbers? Lancet 387:621–624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00273-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rockstroh A, Moges B, Barzon L, Sinigaglia A, Palù G, Kumbukgolla W, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Sarno M, Brites C, Moreira-Soto A, Drexler JF, Ferreira OC, Ulbert S. 2017. Specific detection of dengue and Zika virus antibodies using envelope proteins with mutations in the conserved fusion loop. Emerg Microbes Infect 6:e99. doi: 10.1038/emi.2017.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.