Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2018 Jul 25;14(7):20180382. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0382

Precipitation is the main factor affecting the variation of foliar nitrogen isotope composition in two leguminous shrub species of northwestern China

Fei Ma 1,2,, Ting-Ting Xu 3, Ming Li 1,2, Ji-Li Liu 1,2, Zhao-Jun Sun 1,2
PMCID: PMC6083231  PMID: 30045906

Abstract

An increase in foliar nitrogen isotope composition (δ15N) with decreasing precipitation has been shown to occur widely in non-N2-fixing plant species. However, similar patterns have not been identified in N2-fixing species. Here, we tested the relationships of foliar δ15N with local environmental factors and leaf properties in two leguminous shrub species (Caragana korshinskii and Caragana liouana) sampled from 30 populations. Results indicated that the mean annual precipitation (MAP) primarily accounted for the variation of foliar δ15N in the two species. Further analysis revealed strong negative correlations between foliar δ15N and MAP within and across species. These results suggest that the foliar δ15N of leguminous shrub species also shift along precipitation gradients, which augments our understanding of the relationships between foliar δ15N and climatic factors.

Keywords: foliar nitrogen isotope composition, legume, precipitation

1. Introduction

The foliar nitrogen (N) stable isotope composition (δ15N) integrates several fundamental biogeochemical processes and can be an indicator of N availability [1]. Assessing the variability of foliar δ15N of plants across climatic gradients would thus enhance our understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of N cycling and how disturbances alter the N cycle [24]. Research on this topic has increased over the past decade [14]. Both local and global studies have shown that foliar δ15N increases with decreasing mean annual precipitation (MAP) [46]. However, this general trend has only been considered in non-N2-fixing species [4]. To our knowledge, no such information is available on how foliar δ15N varies with precipitation within and across N2-fixing plant species, although many previous studies conducted at large spatial scales have considered legumes at the functional group level without considering interspecific differences [46].

The genus Caragana belongs to the family Leguminosae and is well known for its role in controlling soil erosion and land desertification, and for its economic values as a honey source, fuel and fodder in China [7]. Because of the great environmental and economic benefits, this genus has attracted increasing attention in ecological research [79]. In this study, we selected two of the most common Caragana species, Caragana korshinskii and Caragana liouana, which are two dominant shrub species in the desert regions of northern China. We asked whether foliar δ15N of these two Caragana species showed negative relationships with precipitation gradients, as reported for non-N2-fixing species.

2. Material and methods

We studied two Caragana species (C. korshinskii and C. liouana) sampled from a total of 30 wild populations (15 for C. korshinskii and 15 for C. liouana) across 28 sites (electronic supplementary material, table S1 and figure S1). Caragana korshinskii and C. liouana are dominant shrub species in the desert steppe regions of northwestern China. At each sampling site, fully expanded sun-exposed leaves were collected from four different individual plants 4 m apart from each other and pooled into one sample. A minimum of three replicates were collected from each population and all samples were collected from robust mature plants that grew in unshaded habitats. Plant samples were placed in paper envelopes and dried at 65°C to a constant mass upon returning to the laboratory. δ15N values were determined from 5 to 6 mg samples of homogeneously ground material of each replicate using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan MAT, Bremen, Germany). Stable N isotope ratios (δ15N) are reported per mil (‰) relative to atmospheric N2: δ15N = (Rsample/Ratmos−1) × 1000 (‰), where Rsample is the isotope ratio (15N/14N) in plant samples, and Ratmos the isotope ratio (15N/14N) for atmospheric N2. Analytical precision, based on repeated measurements of a laboratory plant standard and two protein standards, was within 0.3‰ for δ15N. These analyses also yielded N and carbon (C) concentrations on a mass basis.

Geographical information and altitude were recorded using a global positioning system. Meteorological data of each sampling site were provided by the IWMI (International Water Management Institute) online climate summary service portal (http://wcatlas.iwmi.org/Default.asp), including MAP, mean annual temperature (MAT), daily temperature range (DTR), relative humidity (RH), sunshine hours (SH), wind run (WR), moisture availability index (MAI), Penman–Monteith (PM), mean temperature of warmest month (MTWM) and mean temperature of coldest month (MTCM).

A one-way ANOVA was used to explore the difference in leaf δ15N between populations and between species. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to comprehensively define the relationships between foliar δ15N, the interrelated changes in geographical and climatic factors and leaf properties. Finally, we performed stepwise multiple regressions to test for the relative importance of these variables on foliar δ15N.

3. Results

Foliar δ15N showed substantial variability among populations for each of the two species (electronic supplementary material, figure S2), but the differences between species were not significant (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). Foliar δ15N of C. korshinskii ranged from 0.29 to 2.78‰ with a mean of 1.35‰ and foliar δ15N of C. liouana ranged from −0.37 to 2.86‰ with a mean of 0.91‰ (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).

The 17 variables were examined using PCA. The first PCA axis accounted for 39.48% of the total variation, while the second axis accounted for 33.16% (figure 1). MAI, MAP, DTR, PM, MTWM, MAT and C : N influenced PC1, while PC2 was influenced primarily by latitude, altitude, MTCM, WR, SH and foliar N and C concentrations (figure 1). Further analysis performed by multiple stepwise regressions revealed that, after accounting for species, variation in foliar δ15N was solely controlled by MAP (y = 2.91–0.01MAP, R2 = 0.50, p < 0.001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

PCA based on environmental factors and leaf properties of two Caragana species from 30 populations. Geographical factors: environmental factors: MAP, mean annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual temperature; DTR, daily temperature range; RH, relative humidity; SH, sunshine hours; WR, wind run; MAI, moisture availability index; PM, Penman–Monteith; MTWM, mean temperature of warmest month; MTCM, mean temperature of coldest month. Leaf properties: δ15N, nitrogen isotope composition; N, foliar nitrogen concentration; C, foliar carbon concentration; C : N, the ratio of foliar carbon to nitrogen.

For both species, foliar δ15N was significantly and negatively correlated with MAP (figure 2a). Within each species, the foliar δ15N of both C. korshinskii and C. liouana were significantly negatively correlated with MAP as well (figure 2b,c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Correlation between foliar δ15N and MAP for both species (a), C. korshinskii (b) and C. liouana (c). Shown are linear fits, correlation coefficients and p-values.

4. Discussion

We studied two Caragana species along environmental gradients in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwestern China and found that the mean foliar δ15N values of the two species all fell within the range of δ15N commonly reported for leguminous species (0 ± 2‰) [10]. These relatively low values of leguminous species have been attributed to both the capacity of legumes to obtain N from atmospheric N2, which generally has a δ15N value near 0% [11] and the lack of isotopic discrimination during biological fixation of atmospheric N2 [10,12]. Consistent with previous studies [1315], we also found a significant difference in foliar δ15N among populations within each species (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). This could be due to the large variation in soil δ15N from the east to west regions of northern China [5] and the tight correlation between foliar and soil δ15N [10,16].

As previously observed for non N2-fixing species [4,6], we found that foliar δ15N declined with increasing MAP for all populations (figure 2a). Similarly, Wang et al. [5] also found that foliar δ15N of the genus Caragana significantly decreases with increasing aridity. Interestingly though, we also found that foliar δ15N was strongly negatively correlated with MAP for each of the two Caragana species (figure 2b,c). For non-N2-fixing plant species, the increase in foliar δ15N with decreasing MAP has been explained as a response to the dominant gaseous nitrogen loss pathways in low-MAP environments, which leaves the remaining soil pool enriched in 15N [4,6]. By contrast, N2-fixing plant species can obtain N from both soil N and atmospheric N via symbiotic relationships [17]. However, in arid and semi-arid regions where water and N availability are limited, N2-fixing plants rely heavily on atmospheric N [1719]. Still, symbiotic nitrogen fixation is highly sensitive to changes in water availability [20]. As water availability decreases, the formation of new nodules is suppressed, the size of the nodules decreases and the specific activity of the nodules is reduced [1921]. This likely leads to these species using their developed root systems, taking up water from the deep soil where δ15N values are generally higher in deeper portions of the profile [22]. This could explain the negative relationship between foliar δ15N and precipitation and also reflect a strategy where Caragana species balance the allocation of photosynthates between energy-intensive nodule biosynthesis and structural maintenance within plant organs, such as roots, leaves, stems and seeds [2324], so as to optimize available N.

Although our study highlights the generality of foliar δ15N patterns across climatic gradients, given that the foliar δ15N of leguminous and non-leguminous species vary with precipitation, further studies are also needed to reveal the mechanisms underlying patterns of foliar δ15N, and explain such findings as the differences in gaseous N losses, N2-fixing bacteria and mycorrhizal associations and plant N metabolic processes across climate gradients.

Supplementary Material

Electronic supplementary material
rsbl20180382supp1.docx (524.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the constructive comments by two anonymous reviewers. We would also like to thank Elizabeth Tokarz at Yale University for her assistance with English language and grammatical editing of the manuscript.

Data accessibility

The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

F.M. and T.-T.X. conceived and designed the research; F.M., M.L. and Z.-J.S. collated the data; F.M. and J.-L.L. carried out the analyses; F.M., T.-T.X. and Z.-J.S. wrote the paper. All authors edited and revised the manuscript and agreed to be held accountable for the content therein.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31660188, 31760056, 31260166).

References

  • 1.Craine JM, Brookshire ENJ, Cramer MD, Hasselquist NJ, Koba K, Marin-Spiotta E, Wang LX. 2015. Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 396, 1–26. ( 10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Handley LL, Austin AT, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Raven JA, Heaton THE, Schmidt S, Stewart GR. 1999. The 15N natural abundance (δ15N) of ecosystem samples reflects measures of water availability. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 26, 185–199. ( 10.1071/PP98146) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amundson R, Austin A, Schuur E, Yoo K, Matzek V, Kendall C, Uebersax A, Brenner D, Baisden WT. 2003. Global patterns of the isotopic composition of soil and plant nitrogen. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1031 ( 10.1029/2002GB001903) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Craine JM, et al. 2009. Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. New Phytol. 183, 980–992. ( 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02917.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang C, et al. 2014. Aridity threshold in controlling ecosystem nitrogen cycling in arid and semi-arid grasslands. Nat. Commun. 5, 4799 ( 10.1038/ncomms5799) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou Y, Cheng X, Fan J, Harris W. 2016. Patterns and controls of foliar nitrogen isotope composition on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Plant Soil 406, 1–12. ( 10.1007/s11104-016-2882-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang ML, Fritsch PW, Cruz BC. 2009. Phylogeny of Caragana (Fabaceae) based on DNA sequence data from rbcL, trnS–trnG, and ITS. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 50, 547–559. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ma F, Na XF, Xu TT. 2016. Drought responses of three closely related Caragana species: implication for their vicarious distribution. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2763–2773. ( 10.1002/ece3.2044) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Na XF, Li XR, Zhang ZY, Li M, Kardol P, Xu TT, Wang M, Cao XN, Ma F. 2017. Bacterial community dynamics in the rhizosphere of a long-lived, leguminous shrub across a 40-year age sequence. J. Soil Sediment. 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Högberg P. 1997. 15N natural abundance in soil–plant system. New Phytol. 137, 179–203. ( 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00808.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP. 2002. Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 507–559. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schmidt S, Stewart G. 2003. δ15N values of tropical savanna and monsoon forest species reflect root specialisations and soil nitrogen status. Oecologia 134, 569–577. ( 10.1007/s00442-002-1150-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen LT, Flynn DF, Zhang XW, Gao XL, Lin L, Luo J, Zhao CM. 2015. Divergent patterns of foliar δ13C and δ15N in Quercus aquifolioides with an altitudinal transect on the Tibetan Plateau: an integrated study based on multiple key leaf functional traits. J. Plant Ecol. 8, 303–312. ( 10.1093/jpe/rtu020) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang Y, Siegwolf RTW, Koerner C. 2015. Species specific and environment induced variation of δ13C and δ15N in alpine plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 423 ( 10.3389/fpls.2015.00423) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miao SY, Long LD, Tao WQ, Zeng QC, Chen JH, Huang JL, Wu QH, Tang YJ. 2016. Composition of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in five wetland plants and sediments from the Pearl River estuary, South China. Chem. Ecol. 32, 1–15. ( 10.1080/02757540.2015.1109080) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peri PL, Ladd B, Pepper DA, Bonser SP, Laffan SW, Amelung W. 2012. Carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotope composition in plant and soil in Southern Patagonia's native forests. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 311–321. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02494.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hobbie EA, Macko SA, Williams M. 2000. Correlations between foliar δ15N and nitrogen concentrations may indicate plant–mycorrhizal interactions. Oecologia 122, 273–283. ( 10.1007/PL00008856) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song CJ, Ma KM, Fu BJ, Qu YL, Liu Y. 2009. A review on the functions of nitrogen-fixers in terrestrial ecosystems. Acta Ecol. Sin. 29, 869–877. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prudent M, Vernoud V, Girodet S, Salon C. 2016. How nitrogen fixation is modulated in response to different water availability levels and during recovery: a structural and functional study at the whole plant level. Plant Soil 399, 1–12. ( 10.1007/s11104-015-2674-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Serraj R, Sinclair TR, Purcell LC. 1999. Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 143–155. ( 10.1093/jxb/50.331.143) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Streeter JG. 2003. Effects of drought on nitrogen fixation in soybean root nodules. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 1199–1204. ( 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01041.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hobbie EA, Ouimette AP. 2009. Controls of nitrogen isotope patterns in soil profiles. Biogeochemistry 95, 355–371. ( 10.1007/s10533-009-9328-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Voisin AS, Salon C, Jeudy C, Warembourg FR. 2003. Symbiotic N2 fixation activity in relation to C economy of Pisum sativum L. as a function of plant phenology. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2733–2744. ( 10.1093/jxb/erg290) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schulze J, Adgo E, Schilling G. 1994. The influence of N2-fixation on the carbon balance of leguminous plants. Experientia 50, 906–912. ( 10.1007/BF01923477) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Electronic supplementary material
rsbl20180382supp1.docx (524.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material.


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES