Skip to main content
PMC home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2018 Jul 25;2018:5859415. doi: 10.1155/2018/5859415

Downregulation of CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in Tumor Tissues Is Linked to Worse Overall Survival and Recurrence-Free Survival from Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Xiaojing Ren 1, Yuanyuan Ji 1, Xuhua Jiang 1, Xun Qi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6083600  PMID: 30148168

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the links between CYP450 family genes in tumor tissues and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes.

Methods

Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases GSE14520 and GSE36376 were used to identify differential expressed CYP450 genes between tumor and nontumor tissues and related to HCC clinicopathological features and survivals.

Results

Seven CYP450 genes including CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and CYP4A11 were downregulated in tumor tissues, which were validated in both GSE14520 and GSE36376. HCC patients with CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 low levels in tumor tissues suffered from poorer overall survival (OS) compared to those with high CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in GSE14520 profile (log ranks P = 0.01 and P = 0.006, respectively). In addition, HCC patients with lower CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in tumors had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) than those with higher CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 (log ranks P = 0.02 and P = 0.012, respectively). In GSE36376 validation dataset, HCC patients with lower CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 had worse OS and RFS than those with higher CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 (all P < 0.05), in line with results in GSE14520 dataset. Additionally, lower CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 are associated with advanced clinicopathological features including tumor staging, vascular invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and high alpha fetoprotein (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Downregulation of CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in tumor tissues links to poorer OS and RFS in HCC patients.

1. Introduction

Accounting for 85-90% of primary liver malignancy, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common tumor worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer-related death [1–4]. Over the last 20 years, the incidence of HCC has been rising in the United States and China [1, 2]. Given the complexity of the disease and the large number of useful therapies, patients with HCC still suffered from poor prognosis [5]. To find novel biomarkers for predicting outcomes and efficacy of anticancer agents is of great essential.

The efficacy of anticancer therapy is limited by our inability to predict patient outcomes such as tumor response and toxicity. Drug-metabolizing enzymes in tumor tissues play critical roles in the activation or inactivation of numerous cytotoxic drugs and influence the susceptibility of host and neoplasm to their effects [6]. Cytochrome P450s (CYPs) is a large group of enzymes that localize to mitochondrial membranes or the endoplasmic reticulum and play crucial roles in the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous molecules, including most drugs [7]. It has been suggested that the local expression of CYPs in tumors is very important for the management of cancer since these functionally associated enzymes might be involved both in the development of HCC and in determining the anticancer drug sensitivity of such tumor [8, 9].

Given the key roles of CYPs in tumor development, few data were available of CYPs in tumor tissues and HCC clinicopathological features and survivals. This study aimed to evaluate differential expressed CYP genes and to present predict roles of CYPs in tumor tissues for HCC survivals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

HCC patients in this study were from cohorts in GSE14520 and GSE36376. In GSE14520, 247 HCC patients were identified. Data on gene expression could not be obtained for 22 of these and a further 5 had insufficient clinical outcome data available, leading to 220 patients being included in the analysis. Cases consisted of patients with a history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or HBV-related liver cirrhosis; the diagnosis of HCC was made in all cases by two independent pathologists who had detailed information on clinical presentation and pathological characteristics [10]. In GSE36376, 240 tumor tissues containing no necrosis or hemorrhage were available from primary HCC patients who were treated with surgical resection or liver transplantation at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from July 2000 to May 2006. None of the patients received preoperative chemotherapy.

2.2. Ethics Statement

In GSE14520, all liver tissue was obtained with informed consent from patients who underwent radical resection between 2002 and 2003 at the Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the participating institutes [10]. All participants provided written informed consent, as reported by Roessler et al. [10, 11]. In GSE36376, informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, which is in agreement with reports by Lim HY et al. [12]. The second analysis protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University.

2.3. Source of Data

We extracted the GSE14520 and GSE36376 microarray expression profiles from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database. For GSE14520, tumor sample and microarray processing were reported by Roessler et al. [10, 11]. Gene expression levels were calculated using the matchprobes package in the R programming environment and the log2 RMA-calculated signal intensity was reported. Details of the experiment protocols and data processing are available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM362949. For GSE36376, tumor tissues of HCC patients after curative hepatectomy were profiled using Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). The expression data was retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE14520 and GSE36376, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) [10–12]. We used GEO2R tool for identifying differential expressed genes with criteria of |log FC| > 2 and adjust P < 0.0001.

2.4. Definitions of Outcomes

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death from any disease. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as time from surgery to the date of tumor recurrence or death. In GSE14520, RFS was diagnosed by new lesions found in the computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and an abnormal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) value with a cut-off of 300 ng/ml, including instances when the high pretreatment AFP value did not decrease to a normal level or increased again after becoming normal. In GSE36376, patient serum AFP levels were evaluated and three-phase dynamic CT scans were performed at least once every 3 months after surgery until December 31, 2010. When tumor recurrence was suspected, precise diagnostic imaging was performed by MRI.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Student's t-test was used to compare means for normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for nonnormally distributed continuous data and the Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare survivals between different groups, and the log-rank test was used to estimate the difference in survival. Statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics software version 23.0 from SPSS Inc. (Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Expressed CYPs in Both GSE14520 and GSE36376

As shown in Table 1, eleven CYPs including CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2B7P, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, CYP4A11, CYP4A22, and CYP39A1 were identified differential expression in GSE14520 dataset. In GSE36376, eight CYPs including CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, CYP4A11, and CYP8B1 were significantly differentially expressed. Combinedly, seven CYPs including CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and CYP4A11 were all differentially expressed in both GSE14520 and GSE36376 datasets. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, all the seven differential CYPs were lower expressed in tumor tissues compared to those in nontumor tissues.

Table 1.

Differential expressed CYP450 genes between tumor and nontumor tissues from GSE14520 and GSE36376.

Genes t B log⁡FC P value Adjust P value Common genes
GSE14520           CYP1A2
CYP2A6
CYP2C8
CYP2C9
CYP2E1
CYP3A4
CYP4A11
 CYP1A2 25.7352762 49.901907 4.44705742 1.63E-22 7.31E-27
 CYP2A6 7.9627779 12.348032 3.07188278 3.66E-08 7.66E-10
 CYP2B6 15.7936233 33.005014 3.89306938 6.65E-16 5.37E-19
 CYP2B7P 24.284837 180.032064 3.5900407 1.8E-81 1.25E-83
 CYP2C8 6.4917335 7.665054 4.32698325 0.0000018 8.78E-08
 CYP2C9 23.3715192 46.568366 3.36577273 1.63E-21 2.93E-25
 CYP2E1 8.2816633 13.340866 4.73015789 0.000000016 2.81E-10
 CYP3A4 7.9970664 12.45527 3.99461005 3.37E-08 6.87E-10
 CYP4A11 8.8192119 14.989899 3.11363397 3.99E-09 5.29E-11
 CYP4A22 8.6445676 14.457718 3.17968421 6.1E-09 9.06E-11
 CYP39A1 10.5703094 20.114355 3.19955263 5.84E-11 2.94E-13
GSE36376          
 CYP1A2 30.5006424 240.408848 4.97 1.29E-106 6.05E-110
 CYP2A6 15.0803249 83.643956 2.47 2.71E-40 1.3E-41
 CYP2C8 17.410711 107.141675 3.05 2.5E-50 7.36E-52
 CYP2C9 14.9361339 82.220342 2.36 1.1E-39 5.44E-41
 CYP2E1 15.0716592 83.558278 3 2.95E-40 1.42E-41
 CYP3A4 22.4720068 159.580681 3.91 1.3E-72 1.03E-74
 CYP4A11 14.3069129 76.061125 2.06 4.62E-37 2.65E-38
 CYP8B1 12.9803487 63.40673 2.18 1.18E-31 8.9E-33
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Differential expressed CYPs in GSE14520 profile.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Differential expressed CYPs in GSE36376 profile.

3.2. CYP Genes Associated with OS in HCC

In GSE14520 dataset, we identified the fact that low expressions of four CYPs including CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2E1, and CYP4A11 in tumor tissues were significantly associated with worse OS in HCC patients (log ranks P = 0.01, 0.006, 0.024, and 0.007, respectively, Figure 3). Furtherly, we conducted Kaplan–Meier curve for validation of the four CYPs (CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2E1, and CYP4A11) for evaluating its links to OS in HCC patients from GSE36376 dataset. As shown in Figure 4, downregulation of CYP2A6 was significantly associated with OS in HCC patients with cut-off of 10.0 detected by R program (log rank P = 0.015, Figure 4(a)). And, low expression of CYP2C8 in tumor tissues was linked to worse OS in HCC patients with median cut-off (log rank P = 0.018, Figure 4(b)).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Overall survival (OS) comparison grouped by CYP2A6 (a), CYP2C8 (b), CYP2E1 (c), and CYP4A11 (d) from GSE14520.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Validation of CYP2A6 (a) and CYP2C8 (b) for OS in database GSE36376.

3.3. CYP Genes Associated with RFS in HCC

In GSE14520 dataset, low expressions of two CYPs including CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 were significantly associated with worse RFS in HCC patients (log ranks P = 0.02 and 0.012, respectively, Figure 5). In validation set from GSE36376, downregulation of CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 was also related to poorer RFS in HCC patients (log ranks P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively, Figure 6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) comparison grouped by CYP2A6 (a) and CYP2C8 (b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Validation of CYP2A6 (a) and CYP2C8 (b) for RFS in database GSE36376.

3.4. Relationship between CYP2A6, CYP2C8, and HCC Clinicopathological Features

In GSE14520 profile, HCC patients had advanced TNM staging in CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 low expression groups compared to those in CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 high expression groups (P = 0.005 and P = 0.032, respectively, Table 2). Interestingly, in GSE36376 database, HCC patients with low CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 levels in tumor tissues suffered from more advanced edmondson grade and AJCC staging (all P < 0.05, Table 2). Additionally, HCC patients with low CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 levels in tumor tissues had higher risk of vascular invasion, major portal vein invasion, and intrahepatic metastasis (all P < 0.05, Table 2). Also, those HCC cases with low CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 had significantly higher AFP level (P < 0.001, Table 2). Considered above, we assumed that downregulation of CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in tumor tissues is associated with worse clinicopathological characteristics in HCC patients.

Table 2.

Clinicopathological comparison grouped by CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 from GSE14520 and GSE36376.

Category CYP2A6 P value CYP2C8 P value
High Low High Low
GSE14520            
 HBV viral status (AVR-CC/CC/NA) 25/81/4 31/74/5 0.635 28/78/4 28/77/5 0.943
 Alanine aminotransferase (>50/<50, U/L) 38/72 51/59 0.099 42/68 47/63 0.583
 Main tumor size (>5/<5/NA, cm) 34/76/0 44/65/1 0.16 33/77/0 45/64/1 0.091
 Multinodular (yes/no) 18/92 27/83 0.181 21/89 24/86 0.738
 Cirrhosis (yes/no) 101/9 101/9 1.0 101/9 101/9 1.0
 TNM staging (I/II/III/NA) 57/37/15/1 36/40/33/1 0.005 56/33/21/0 37/44/27/2 0.032
 BCLC staging (0-A/B/C/NA) 83/9/7/1 75/13/21/1 0.039 79/8/13/0 79/14/15/2 0.357
GSE36376            
 Edmondson grade (I/II/III) 16/100/4 8/97/15 0.01 19/96/5 5/101/14 0.002
 Tumor size (median), mm 34 (31) 40 (45) 0.203 34 (30) 42 (45) 0.081
 Vascular invasion (yes/no) 51/69 84/36 <0.001 51/69 84/36 <0.001
 Major portal vein invasion (yes/no) 1/119 8/112 0.036 1/119 8/112 0.036
 Intrahepatic metastasis (yes/no) 17/103 38/82 0.002 18/102 37/83 0.005
 Multicentric occurrence (yes/no) 8/112 5/115 0.57 7/113 6/114 1.0
 Direct invasion of adjacent organ (yes/no) 3/117 2/118 1.0 3/117 2/118 1.0
 AJCC staging (1/2/3/4) 66/43/8/3 36/57/25/2 <0.001 67/42/8/3 35/58/25/2 <0.001
 BCLC staging (A/B/C) 75/43/2 64/48/8 0.092 80/38/2 59/53/8 0.009
 Alpha fetoprotein [Median (IQR), ng/ml] 9.65 (82.2) 256.6 (4136.8) <0.001 9.1 (61.6) 303.8 (9534.45) <0.001
Open in a new tab

NA: not available; AVR-CC: active viral replication chronic carrier; CC: chronic carrier; IQR: interquartile range;

4. Discussion

As key enzymes in cancer formation and cancer treatment, CYPs mediate the metabolic activation of multiple procarcinogens and participate in the inactivation and activation of anticancer drugs [13]. CYPs polymorphisms have been extensively studied with respect to genetic predisposition to cancer and clinical outcome in terms of response and toxicity to anticancer drugs [14]. Various studies have also shown the significance of CYPs polymorphisms in cancer susceptibility [15–18]. Some members of CYPs family also affect the metabolism of various environmental carcinogens [14]. In HCC patients, CYP1A1, CYP2D6, and CYP2E1 were all found to be associated with increased HCC risk in different population [19–21]. However, a consistent view does not yet exist [14, 22].

CYPs are key enzymes involved in cancer development and mediate the metabolic activation of numerous procarcinogens [13]. To assess the CYPs activity changes would be useful not only for designing personalized HCC treatments, but also for identifying potential factors that contribute to HCC susceptibility [23]. In our study, we found that several CYPs including CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and CYP4A11 were all downregulated in tumor tissues in HCC patients. And, low expression of CYP2A6 in tumor tissues contributed to worse survivals from HCC cases. CYP2A6 is primarily expressed in the liver and metabolizes several clinically relevant substrates [24]. Variation in CYP2A6 activity is involved in the metabolism or bioactivation of clinical therapeutics and carcinogens, leading to an important clinical consideration [25–27]. CYP2A6 was also associated with worse clinicopathological characteristics including advanced tumor staging, vascular invasion, major portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and increased AFP level in our study. In line with our findings, CYP2A6 is highly polymorphic and its genetic variants can result in reduced expression by affecting transcriptional or translational processes [28]. Clinically, genetic variation in CYP2A6 may contribute to lung cancer risk [29, 30]. However, few studies focused on the relationships between CYP2A6 and HCC development. Raunio H et al. investigated the distribution of the CYP2A6 protein in a series of 24 human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) samples by immunohistochemical analysis. They found that CYP2A6 protein was very heterogeneous in tumor cells and HCC do not uniformly overexpress the CYP2A6 protein, suggesting that increased expression of CYP2A6 occurred in a distinct subpopulation of neoplastic cells. Additionally, they found that patients with CYP2A6-positive tumors achieved a more favorable prognosis compared with patients with CYP2A6-negative tumors [31]. Our results conformed and replenished the previous research [8, 31]. More detailed studies on the association between CYP2A6 and HCC should be conducted.

Several genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C8 may influence survival after cancer diagnosis due to their role in the metabolism of various breast cancer chemotherapy drugs [32]. However, the risk of developing colorectal cancer does not seem to be related to the commonest functional genetic variation in the CYP2C8 gene [33]. Unfortunately, knowledge on CYP2C8 in tumors and HCC outcomes is limited. Our research demonstrated that CYP2C8 downregulation in tumor tissues was associated with advanced tumor phenotype and worse OS and RFS. Yan et al. determined seven CYPs including CYP2C8 in tumor and pericarcinomatous tissues harvested from 26 patients with HBV-positive HCC using probe substrates. A major decrease of CYP2C8 in tumor tissues was observed [6], in line with a study by Zhou et al. [23]. Experimentally, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 3-methylcholanthrene suppressed CYP2C8 mRNA levels in the HCC cell line HepG2, and basal CYP2C8 expression was extremely low [34]. That is, CYP2C8 expression levels are greatly disrupted by the tumorigenic process [6]. Since drug metabolism mediated by tumor CYPs can be used as a marker for potential mechanism of drug resistance and/or an approach to achieve optimal chemotherapy, to upregulate CYP2C8 levels, and activations should be considered for HCC treatment strategy.

There are some limitations in this study. Firstly, CYPs expression in our research is limited in mRNA level, which may not necessarily reflect that in activities of CYPs. Secondly, in our analysis based on GEO database, no further mechanism data were shown.

According to our results, we cautiously drew the conclusion that downregulation of CYP2A6 and CYP2C8 in tumor tissues is linked to worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival from hepatocellular carcinoma. A detailed understanding of the differential expression and activity of CYPs within HCC tumor tissues may provide opportunities and more alternatives for improved therapeutic outcome.

Data Availability

All the data in this study were available from GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).

Disclosure

This work was not supported by any pharmaceutical company or government agency or grants from other sources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Heimbach J. K., Kulik L. M., Finn R. S., et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Omata M., Cheng A.-L., Kokudo N., et al. Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatology International. 2017;11(4):317–370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017;67(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Torre L. A., Bray F., Siegel R. L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fitzmorris P., Shoreibah M., Anand B. S., Singal A. K. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2015;141(5):861–876. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1806-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yan T., Lu L., Xie C., et al. Severely impaired and dysregulated cytochrome P450 expression and activities in hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications for personalized treatment in patients. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2015;14(12):2874–2886. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sheweita S. A. Drug-metabolizing enzymes: mechanisms and functions. Current Drug Metabolism. 2000;1(2):107–132. doi: 10.2174/1389200003339117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oyama T., Kagawa N., Kunugita N., et al. Expression of cytochrome P450 in tumor tissues and its association with cancer development. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2004;9:1967–1976. doi: 10.2741/1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Michael M., Doherty M. M. Drug metabolism by tumours: Its nature, relevance and therapeutic implications. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2007;3(6):783–803. doi: 10.1517/17425255.3.6.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roessler S., Jia H.-L., Budhu A., et al. A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Research. 2010;70(24):10202–10212. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roessler S., Long E. L., Budhu A., et al. Integrative genomic identification of genes on 8p associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression and patient survival. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):957 e912–966 e912. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lim H.-Y., Sohn I., Deng S., et al. Prediction of disease-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2013;20(12):3747–3753. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3070-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rodriguez-Antona C., Ingelman-Sundberg M. Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25(11):1679–1691. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mittal B., Tulsyan S., Kumar S., Mittal R. D., Agarwal G. Cytochrome P450 in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment. Advances in Clinical Chemistry. 2015;71:77–139. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yao L., Wang H. C., Liu J. Z., Xiong Z. M. Quantitative assessment of the influence of cytochrome P450 2C19 gene polymorphisms and digestive tract cancer risk. Tumor Biology. 2013;34(5):3083–3091. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0875-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shen F.-F., Zhou F.-Y., Xue Q.-S., et al. Association between CYP1A1 polymorphisms and esophageal cancer: A meta-Analysis. Molecular Biology Reports. 2013;40(10):6035–6042. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2713-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Economopoulos K. P., Sergentanis T. N. Three polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) gene and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2010;122(2):545–551. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0728-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abbas A., Delvinquiere K., Lechevrel M., Lebailly P., Gauduchon P., Launoy G., et al. GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to esophageal cancer in a french population: different pattern of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;10(23):3389–3393. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agúndez J. A. G., Leedesma M. C., Benítez J., et al. CYP2D6 genes and risk of liver cancer. The Lancet. 1995;345(8953):830–831. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92965-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu M.-W., Gladek-Yarborough A., Chiamprasert S. Cytochrome P450 2E1 and glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1995;109(4):1266–1273. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90587-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu M.-W., Chiu Y.-H., Yang S.-Y., et al. Cytochrome P450 1A1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among chronic hepatitis B carriers. British Journal of Cancer. 1999;80(3-4):598–603. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Silvestri L., Sonzogni L., De Silvestri A., et al. CYP enzyme polymorphisms and susceptibility to HCV-related chronic liver disease and liver cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 2003;104(3):310–317. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou J., Wen Q., Li S.-F., et al. Significant change of cytochrome P450s activities in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(31):50612–50623. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McDonagh E. M., Wassenaar C., David S. P., et al. PharmGKB summary: Very important pharmacogene information for cytochrome P-450, family 2, subfamily A, polypeptide 6. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. 2012;22(9):695–708. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283540217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ikeda K., Yoshisue K., Matsushima E., et al. Bioactivation of tegafur to 5-fluorouracil is catalyzed by cytochrome P-450 2A6 in human liver microsomes in vitro. Clinical Cancer Research. 2000;6(11):4409–4415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wong H. L., Murphy S. E., Hecht S. S. Cytochrome P450 2A-catalyzed metabolic activation of structurally similar carcinogenic nitrosamines: N′-Nitrosonornicotine enantiomers, N-nitrosopiperidine, and N-nitrosopyrrolidine. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2005;18(1):61–69. doi: 10.1021/tx0497696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Murai K., Yamazaki H., Nakagawa K., Kawai R., Kamataki T. Deactivation of anti-cancer drug letrozole to a carbinol metabolite by polymorphic cytochrome P450 2A6 in human liver microsomes. Xenobiotica. 2009;39(11):795–802. doi: 10.3109/00498250903171395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Di Y. M., Chow V. D.-W., Yang L.-P., Zhou S.-F. Structure, function, regulation and polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 2A6. Current Drug Metabolism. 2009;10(7):754–780. doi: 10.2174/138920009789895507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yuan J.-M., Nelson H. H., Carmella S. G., et al. CYP2A6 genetic polymorphisms and biomarkers of tobacco smoke constituents in relation to risk of lung cancer in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38(4):411–418. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu Y.-L., Xu Y., Li F., Chen H., Guo S.-L. CYP2A6 deletion polymorphism is associated with decreased susceptibility of lung cancer in Asian smokers: A meta-analysis. Tumor Biology. 2013;34(5):2651–2657. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0815-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Raunio H., Juvonen R., Pasanen M., Pelkonen O., Pääkkö P., Soini Y. Cytochrome P4502A6 (CYP2A6) expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1998;27(2):427–432. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jernström H., Bgeman E., Rose C., Jönsson P.-E., Ingvar C. CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms in relation to tumour characteristics and early breast cancer related events among 652 breast cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer. 2009;101(11):1817–1823. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ladero J. M., Agúndez J. A. G., Martínez C., Amo G., Ayuso P., García-Martín E. Analysis of the functional polymorphism in the cytochrome P450 CYP2C8 gene rs11572080 with regard to colorectal cancer risk. Frontiers in Genetics. 2012;3:p. 278. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Utgikar R., Riddick D. S. Downregulation of cytochrome P450 2C8 by 3-methylcholanthrene in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2017;95(6):768–771. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2017-0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data in this study were available from GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES