Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2017 Jun 18;136(6):698–707. doi: 10.1111/ane.12789

Controlled population‐based comparative study of USA and international adult [55‐74] neurological deaths 1989‐2014

C Pritchard 1,, E Rosenorn‐Lanng 1, A Silk 1, L Hansen 2
PMCID: PMC6084346  PMID: 28626907

Abstract

Objectives

A population‐based controlled study to determine whether adult (55‐74 years) neurological disease deaths are continuing to rise and are there significant differences between America and the twenty developed countries 1989‐91 and 2012‐14.

Method

Total Neurological Deaths (TND) rates contrasted against control Cancer and Circulatory Disease Deaths (CDD) extrapolated from WHO data. Confidence intervals compare USA and the other countries over the period. The Over‐75's TND and population increases are examined as a context for the 55‐74 outcomes.

Results

Male neurological deaths rose >10% in eleven countries, the other countries average rose 20% the USA 43% over the period. Female neurological deaths rose >10% in ten counties, averaging 14%, the USA up 68%. USA male and female neurological deaths increased significantly more than twelve and seventeen countries, respectively. USA over‐75s population increased by 49%, other countries 56%. Other countries TND up 187% the USA rose fourfold. Male and female cancer and CDD fell in every country averaging 26% and 21%, respectively, and 64% and 67% for CDD. Male neurological rates rose significantly more than Cancer and CCD in every country; Female neurological deaths rose significantly more than cancer in 17 countries and every country for CDD. There was no significant correlation between increases in neurological deaths and decreases in control mortalities.

Conclusions

There are substantial increases in neurological deaths in most countries, significantly so in America. Rises in the 55‐74 and over‐75's rates are not primarily due to demographic changes and are a matter of concern warranting further investigation.

Keywords: comparison, international, mortality, neurological, USA

1. INTRODUCTION

From neurological studies covering the later part of the 20th century, evidence is growing of increases in a range of neurological morbidity and mortality especially related to Alzheimer's and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), known as Motor Neurone Disease (MND) in Europe.1, 2, 3, 4 The accumulation of evidence has continued to build in this century.5, 6, 7, 8 The first international comparison of the changing neurological mortality was between 1979‐1981 and 1995‐1997 in twenty‐one developed countries found that the dementias were starting a decade earlier in a number of nations.5, 7 This was followed‐up in a second international study taking the results to 2010. The latter analysis used the later baseline years of 1989‐91, which confirmed the earlier onset of neurological morbidity and that neurological deaths continued to increase in the majority of the countries reviewed.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Rises in USA the over‐75s neurological deaths were considerable as the USA had significantly greater increases than fourteen of the other twenty nations, with threefold rises in American men and a fivefold increase in women in just 21 years.8 Furthermore, there is a new interest in neurological diseases in Latin America and Asia, with a rising incidence than previously, although the rates remain lower than those found in developed countries,2, 12, 13 suggesting this is increasingly a worldwide phenomenon.

The rises in neurological mortality have been questioned as an artefact, for example, due to improved diagnosis of ALS14 and the effect of changing demographics giving rise to the “Gompertzian hypothesis.” This states that the neurological increases are a consequence of people living longer and therefore developing age‐related diseases that they had not lived long enough to develop previously.15, 16, 17 However, the diagnostic issue has limited impact as it is mortality rates that are measured not separate diagnostic categories, and at this point, there is little evidence of diagnostic uncertainty as the primary cause of death is categorized as being due to a neurological condition.1, 5, 6, 7, 8 Moreover, the Gompertzian position appears to have ignored the marked changes between the sexes and in different countries.1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Crucially, the Gompertzian hypothesis does not account for the substantial rise in early onset dementia reported in many Western countries.12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22

To reduce a primarily Gompertzian explanation, this population‐based study focuses upon people aged 55‐74 years, below life expectancies in the developed world and utilizes the latest WHO data, updated December 2016 to take the analysis up to 2014.23 Consequently, studying the adults aged 55‐74 over a relatively short time means any Gompertzian influence will be minimal. However, to place the results on adults aged 55‐74 in a wider context, the over‐75s rates and matching population increases are also examined to explore any possible strengths of the Gompertzian influence.

Two control mortalities are juxtaposed against neurological death rates, Cancer Mortality and Circulatory Disease Deaths (CDD) because they are considered age related. It should be noted, however, that this analysis is not designed to postulate about possible aetiologies, but only to determine whether there continues to be substantial increases in neurological deaths over the past two decades and whether there are any significant differences in the US rates and the other nations.

There are four working null hypotheses; in each country between 1989‐91 and 2012‐14 that there will be no statistically significant differences between:

  1. Total Neurological Deaths and Cancer Mortality;

  2. Total Neurological Deaths and CDD,

  3. between USA neurological death rates and the other twenty developed countries, and

  4. no statistical association between rises in neurological deaths and falls in the control mortalities of Cancer and CDD.

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD

This population‐based study of the latest WHO mortality data, updated December 2016, examines mortality rates per million (pm) of population of people aged 55‐74 years by sex. The categories are based upon the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases ensuring as uniform a categorization as possible.23 The WHO classifies neurological mortality under two broad categories, Nervous Disease Deaths (G00‐G99), which include Parkinson's disease, Motor Neurone Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple System Atrophy, etc. and Alzheimer's disease and Other Dementias (F01‐F03 G30‐31).23 The two rates are combined to calculate a Total Neurological Death (TND) rate for the average baseline years for 1989‐91 with the average index years 2012‐14.23 Germany, Portugal and Spain baseline years are 1990‐92, and the few countries that have earlier index years, 2010‐12 and 2011‐13, are noted in the tables. Whilst the focus is upon people aged 55‐74, as a context for the 55‐74 results, the over‐75s TND rates and increases in population are also examined to indicate whether the rises in the elderly TND are primarily related to increased population.

The control mortality categories are Cancer Mortality (CM) (coded C00‐D48, WHO, 2015) and the CDD (coded H100‐199).23 Each country is compared against its baseline and index years, and a ratio of change over the period is calculated.

An inherent problem of international comparisons is the reliability of the data as well as how differing health/social policies and health services influence health outcomes. Only country‐specific research could resolve this latter problem. The issue of reliability of diagnosis can be significant,14 but is largely resolved at the point of death in a global category such as “nervous disease deaths”.1, 5, 6, 7, 8 It is acknowledged that 100% accuracy can never be established, but as the WHO data are collected in a consistent and uniform system in these broad categories this is probably the most reliable and valid international data as yet available.

2.1. Statistics

Confidence intervals (to ±95% significance) are used to compare changes between the control mortalities and TND over the period and between the USA and the other countries. Spearman's rank order correlation examines any link between increases in neurological mortality any decreases in either Cancer or CDD deaths. Odds ratio calculates proportional differences between ratios of change, from which a ratio of ratios is calculated. An example best explains this. Rises in neurological deaths5, 7, 8 had been attributed to rises in population15, 16, 17. Odds ratio tests this using the ratio of change in the USA elderly population, 1989 and 2014, giving a ratio of 1.49 and divides it into the ratio of change of neurological deaths, 5.13 and the ensuing ratio of ratios is the odds ratio of 3.44.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Male (55‐74) TND

Table 1 lists adult (55‐74) Male Total Neurological Deaths (TND) ranked by the highest frequency ranging from Finland at 1070 per million (pm), USA 690 pm and Belgium 645 pm down to Japan 270 pm, Greece 307 pm and Austria 363 pm.

Table 1.

Changes in Total Neurological Deaths (TND) rates per million (pm) by gender (55‐74) & ratio of change 1989‐91 v 2012‐14 ranked by highest male rates

Country and years TND Male 1989 TND Male 2014 Ratio of change TND Female 1989 TND Female 2014 Ratio of change
1. Finland 2012‐14 657 1070 1.63 604 924 1.53
2. USA 2012‐14 481 690 1.43 367 618 1.68
3. Belgium 2011‐13 658 645 0.98 562 472 0.84
4. UK 2011‐13 579 629 1.09 525 564 1.07
5. Sweden 2012‐14 377 604 1.18 510 540 1.03
6. Norway 2012‐14 525 602 1.15 539 554 1.03
7. Denmark 2012‐14 346 565 1.63 377 509 1.35
8. Netherlands 2012‐14 520 564 1.08 354 487 1.38
9. Ireland 2011‐13 523 538 1.03 428 488 1.14
10. Spain 2012‐14 378 527 1.39 356 400 1.12
11. France 2011‐13 525 517 0.98 401 375 0.94
12. Germany 2012‐14 403 516 1.28 339 392 1.16
13. Switzerland 2011‐13 530 510 0.96 466 471 1.01
14. Australia 2012‐14 451 510 1.13 365 427 1.17
15. Canada 2010‐12 523 493 0.94 430 414 0.96
16. Italy 2010‐12 456 479 1.05 367 374 1.02
17. Portugal 2012‐14 271 467 1.72 204 399 1.96
18. N. Zealand 2010‐12 446 462 0.99 402 414 1.03
19. Austria 2012‐14 349 363 1.04 314 334 1.06
20. Greece 2011‐13 186 307 1.65 165 252 1.53
21. Japan 2012‐14 206 270 1.32 173 176 1.02
Rest (‐US) Average 445 532 1.20 394 448 1.14
Rest average:USA ratio 1:1.08 1:1.30 1:1.19 1:0.93 1:1.38 1:1.47

The values for USA are highlighted in bold.

Neurological deaths rose by >10% in eleven countries—Portugal 72% Greece 65%, Denmark and Finland 63%, the USA 43%, Spain 39%, Japan 32%, Germany 28%, Sweden 18%, Norway 15% and Australia, 13%. There were falls >5 in Belgium, Canada, France and New Zealand. In the earlier 1989‐91 period, the USA was the 10th highest of the twenty‐one countries but is now second highest.

3.2. Female (55‐74) TND

The highest rates were Finland 924 pm, USA 618 pm and the UK 564 pm, the lowest being Japan 176 pm, Greece 252 pm and Austria 334 pm.

Ten countries female rates rose by more than >10% in Portugal 96%, the USA 68%, Greece and Finland 53%, Netherlands 38%, Denmark 35%, Spain 12%, Australia 17%, Germany 16% and Ireland 14%. There were falls in Belgium of 16%, France 6% and Canada 4%. At the base‐line years, USA female rates were 11th highest but are now second.

Male and female current rates were significantly correlated (Rho=+0.7714, P<.001).

Over the period, there were only few changes between the gender, male and female 1989‐91 rates correlated (Rho=+0.8263) and in 2012‐14 (Rho=+0.8429, P<.001).

3.3. Over‐75s TND as context 1989‐2014

Table 2 lists over‐75s rates of both sexes and population increases. The highest was Finland at 20 562 pm followed by the USA at 17 207, the Netherlands at 13 145 pm the lowest being Greece 1382, Canada 1746 pm and Japan 2479 pm. Previously the USA had been 9th highest of 21 countries. There was a positive correlation between increases in the 55‐74 and over‐75s (Rho=+0.8760, P<.001) indicating consistency across the countries under review.

Table 2.

Both sexes over‐75's Total Neurological Death (TND) rates per million 1989‐2014 ratio of change and total population to TND odds ratios (Doubled in BOLD). Ranked by highest TND

Country Population 1989 Ratio of change TND Ratio of change Odds ratio
1. Finland 1989
2014
0.281
0.459
1.63 7204
20 562
2.85 1:1.75
2. USA 1989
2014
13.103
19.477
1.49 3355
17 207
5.13 1:3.44
3. Netherlands 1989
2014
0.814
1.221
1.50 3420
13 145
3.84 1:2.56
4. Sweden 1995
2014
0.683
0.816
1.20 3322
12 956
3.90 1:3.25
5. UK 1989
2013
3.987
5.036
1.26 4767
12 780
2.68 1:2.13
6. Switzerland 1989
2013
0.471
0.647
1.37 7344
12 521
1.71 1:1.25
7. Norway 1989
2014
0.299
0.354
1.18 3297
11 261
3.43 1:2.90
8. Spain 1989
2014
2.142
4.271
1.99 3290
11 221
3.41 1:1.71
9. France 1989
2013
3.931
5.785
1.47 4227
11 066
2.62 1:1.78
10. Australia 1989
2014
0.744
1.496
1.98 4488
11 064
2.47 1:1.25
11. Denmark 1994
2014
0.362
0.411
1.14 2279
10 685
4.69 1:4.11
12. Belgium 1989
2014
0.659
0.969
1.47 8101
10 337
1.28 1:0.87
13. Ireland 1989
2013
0.159
0.235
1.48 3329
9835
2.95 1:1.99
14. N. Zealand 1989
2012
0.152
0.263
1.73 3265
9222
2.82 1:1.63
15. Italy 1989
2012
3.678
6.139
1.67 2493
7105
2.81 1:1.68
16. Germany 1990
2014
5.549
8.178
1.47 1977
5919
2.99 1:2.03
17. Austria 1989
2014
0.527
0.693
1.31 1640
5540
3.38 1:2.58
18. Portugal 1989
2014
0.527
1.006
1.91 899
5537
6.16 1:3.23
19. Japan 1989
2014
5.974
15.521
2.60 759
2479
3.27 1:1.26
20. Canada 1989
2012
1.296
2.297
1.77 484
1746
3.61 1:2.04
21. Greece 1989
2013
0.608
1.112
1.83 1080
1382
1.28 1:0.70
Rest average (‐US) 1.56 3383
9718
2.87 1:1.84

The USA had substantially the biggest rise, up fourfold, whilst the elderly American population increased by just 49%, yielding an odds ratio of 1:3.44. The average population rise in the other countries was 56% with TND rising on average 187%, yielding an odds ratio of 1:1.84. Except Belgium and Greece, every country's population to TND odds ratio rose substantially (1:1.25) ten doubling over the period.

3.4. USA v other countries

Table 3 presents USA male rates compared with each of the other twenty countries using confidence intervals (±95%) shaded areas showing significant differences. The USA had significantly greater rises than twelve other countries, and no country had bigger increases than the USA.

Table 3.

Confidence intervals comparing other countries v USA neurological death rates 1989‐2014

Country Male Female
OR Lower Upper OR Lower Upper
Australia 1:1.27 1:1.07 1:1.51 1:1.44 1:1.19 1:1.74
Austria 1:1.38 1:1.14 1:1.66 1:1.58 1:1.29 1:1.94
Belgium 1:1.46 1:1.25 1:1.72 1:2.01 1:1.68 1:2.4
Canada 1:1.52 1:1.28 1:1.8 1:1.75 1:1.45 1:2.11
Denmark 1:0.88 1:0.74 1:1.05 1:1.25 1:1.04 1:1.5
Finland 1:0.88 1:0.76 1:1.03 1:1.10 1:0.93 1:1.3
France 1:1.46 1:1.23 1:1.72 1:1.80 1:1.49 1:2.18
Germany 1:1.12 1:0.94 1:1.33 1:1.46 1:1.20 1:1.77
Greece 1:0.87 1:0.70 1:1.08 1:1.10 1:0.87 1:1.39
Ireland 1:1.39 1:1.18 1:1.65 1:1.48 1:1.23 1:1.77
Italy 1:1.37 1:1.15 1:1.62 1:1.65 1:1.36 1:2.01
Japan 1:1.09 1:0.88 1:1.36 1:1.66 1:1.29 1:2.12
Netherlands 1:1.32 1:1.12 1:1.56 1:1.22 1:1.01 1:1.48
New Zealand 1:1.38 1:1.16 1:1.65 1:1.64 1:1.35 1:1.97
Norway 1:1.25 1:1.06 1:1.48 1:1.64 1:1.37 1:1.95
Portugal 1:0.83 1:0.69 1:1.01 1:0.86 1:0.70 1:1.06
Spain 1:1.03 1:0.86 1:1.23 1:1.50 1:1.24 1:1.82
Sweden 1:0.90 1:0.75 1:1.07 1:1.59 1:1.33 1:1.9
Switzerland 1:1.49 1:1.26 1:1.76 1:1.67 1:1.39 1:2
UK 1:1.32 1:1.12 1:1.55 1:1.57 1:1.32 1:1.87
USA 1:10 1:0.85 1:1.18 1:10 1:0.83 1:1.2

Grey areas statistically significant (±95%).

USA female rates rose significantly more than seventeen other countries, whilst no other country had bigger increases than the USA.

3.5. Control mortalities

3.5.1. Males: Cancer

Table 4 present changes in Cancer and CDD over the period, ranked by the highest CDD.

Table 4.

Males and female cancer and CDD rates per million ranked by highest male CDD

Country and years Male rank Male cancer % of Change Male CDD % of Change Female rank Female cancer % of Change Female CDD % of Change
1. Finland 1989
Finland 2014
1 6844
4731
−31 13 289
5056
−62 7 3954
3274
−17 5836
1256
−88
2. Greece 1989
Greece 2013
2 6281
6245
−1 7922
4882
−38 1 3073
2924
−5 4833
2886
−40
3. USA 1989
USA 2014
3 8313
4908
41 10 652
4509
58 2 5654
3048
46 8526
3879
55
4. Germany 1989
Germany 2014
4 7293
6047
−17 9856
4370
−56 3 4399
3862
−12 4598
1892
−59
5. Austria 1989
Austria 2014
5 7574
5824
−23 9987
4005
−60 4 4490
3865
−14 4776
1711
−64
6. Ireland 1989
Ireland 2013
6 8114
5481
−32 13 873
3763
−73 9 5591
4147
−26 6450
1550
−76
7. UK 1989
UK 2013
7 8492
5636
−34 12 329
3647
−70 6 5831
4190
−28 6198
1631
−74
8. Sweden 1989
Sweden 2014
8 6132
4424
−28 10 546
3546
−66 8 4520
3508
−28 3391
1094
−68
9. N, Zealand 89. Zealand 2012 9 7698
5028
−35 10 918
3375
−69 5 5774
3988
−31 5674
1590
−72
10. Belgium 1989
Belgium 2013
10 8484
6096
−28 7494
3276
−56 10 4195
3760
−10 3581
1526
−57
11. Italy 1989
Italy 2012
11 8901
6107
−31 6942
3224
−54 11 4099
3541
−14 3352
1528
−54
12. Portugal 89
Portugal 2014
13 6287
6145
−2 9240
3180
−66 12 3374
2837
−16 5250
1448
−72
13. Denmark 89
Denmark 2014
12 8824
6198
−30 9501
2990
−69 13 6729
4849
−28 4435
1342
−70
14. Canada 89
Canada 2012
14 7845
4971
−37 8128
2979
−63 15 4986
3883
−22 3655
1317
−64
15. Spain 1989
Span 2014
16 6343
6176
−3 6218
2827
−55 19 3207
2742
−14 3212
1365
−58
16. Japan 1989
Japan 2014
17 6524
5595
−14 4570
2797
−39 18 3020
2706
−10 2607
1094
−58
17. Norway 1989
Norway 2014
18 6910
4659
−33 11 937
2783
−77 16 4793
3778
−21 4852
1156
−76
18. Australia 89
Australia 2014
19 7231
4648
−36 8954
2351
−74 17 4453
3195
−28 4461
1001
−78
19. Switzerland89
Switzerland 2013
20 6536
3956
−39 5772
2557
−56 20 3850
3284
−15 2393
1061
−56
20. Netherland 89
Netherlands 2014
15 8543
5922
−30 9169
2452
−73 14 4717
4486
−5 3786
1337
−65
21. France 1989
France 2013
21 8024
6322
−21 5617
2354
−58 21 3535
3136
−11 2033
852
−58
Rest (‐US) Average 2014 7444
5511
−26 9118
3321
−64 4430
3514
−21 4369
1432
−67

The values for USA are highlighted in bold.

In respect to cancer deaths, the current Western average (minus the USA) was 5511 pm, representing a fall over the period of 26%. The highest rate was France at 6322 pm, the lowest Switzerland 3956 pm, with the USA being fifth lowest at 4908 pm, representing a fall of 41% over the period.

There was a significant negative correlation between decreases in cancer mortality with increases in neurological death (Rho=−0.4521, P<.025).

3.5.2. Male CDD

The initial Western average rate was 9118 pm falling to 3321 pm, an equivalent fall of 64%. The highest CDD was Finland 5056 pm, the lowest France 2354 pm, the USA was third highest at 4509 pm but equivalent to a fall of 58%.

There was a slight none significant negative correlation between decreases in CDD and rises in neurological deaths (Rho=−0.2050 n.sig).

3.5.3. Females: Cancer

Table 4 shows female cancer rates, the Western average being 3514 pm, representing a fall of 21%. The highest was Denmark 4849 pm the lowest Japan at 2706 pm. The USA at 3048 pm was the fifth lowest, equivalent to a fall of 46% over the period.

There was no significant correlation between decreases in female cancer and increases in neurological deaths (Rho=−0.1312 n.sig).

3.5.4. Female CDD

The Western average was 1432 pm, representing a fall of 67% over the period, the highest was the USA 3879 pm, although equivalent to a 46% reduction over the period, the lowest was France 852 pm.

There was no significant correlation between decreases in CDD and rises in neurological deaths (Rho=−0.2618 n.sig).

3.5.5. Comparing control to neurological deaths

Table 5 provides the confidence interval results comparing male cancer to neurological and CDD to neurological deaths over the period.

Table 5.

Confidence intervals male and female 55‐74 cancer v Total Neurological Deaths and CDD v Total Neurological Deaths 1989‐2013

Confidence intervals—Cancer: ND/CDD: TND MALES Confidence intervals—Cancer: ND/CDD:TND FEMALES
Cancer: ND CDD: ND Cancer: ND CDD: ND
OR Lower Upper OR Lower Upper OR Lower Upper OR Lower Upper
Australia 1:1.76 1:1.54 1:2.01 1:4.31 1:3.76 1:4.93 1:1.63 1:1.41 1:1.89 1:5.21 1:4.46 1:6.09
Austria 1:1.35 1:1.16 1:1.57 1:2.59 1:2.23 1:3.02 1:1.24 1:1.05 1:1.45 1:2.97 1:2.52 1:3.5
Belgium 1:1.36 1:1.22 1:1.53 1:2.24 1:2.20 1:2.52 1:0.94 1:0.82 1:1.07 1:1.97 1:1.72 1:2.26
Canada 1:1.49 1:1.31 1:1.69 1:2.57 1:2.26 1:2.93 1:1.24 1:1.07 1:1.42 1:2.67 1:2.30 1:3.10
Denmark 1.2.32 1:2.03 1:2.67 1:5.19 1:4.51 1:5.97 1:1.87 1:1.3 1:2.15 1:4.46 1:3.85 1:5.17
Finland 1:2.36 1:2.12 1:2.61 1:4.28 1:3.86 1:4.74 1:1.85 1:1.65 1:2.07 1:7.11 1:6.31 1:8.01
France 1:1.25 1:1.10 1:1.42 1:2.35 1:2.06 1:2.68 1:1.05 1:0.91 1:1.22 1:2.23 1:1.90 1:2.62
Germany 1:1.54 1:1.35 1:1.77 1:2.89 1:2.52 1:3.31 1:1.32 1:1.13 1:1.53 1:2.81 1:2.41 1:3.28
Greece 1:1.66 1:1.38 1:1:20 1:2.68 1:2.22 1:3.22 1:1.31 1:1.31 1:1.97 1:2.56 1:2.09 1:3.13
Ireland 1:1.52 1:1.34 1:1.73 1:3.79 1:3.34 1:4.3 1:1.34 1:1.54 1:1.76 1:4.12 1:4.74 1:5.46
Italy 1:1.53 1:1.34 1:1.75 1:2.26 1:1.98 1:2.59 1:1.01 1:1.18 1:1.37 1:1.91 1:2.24 1:2.62
Japan 1:1.53 1:1.27 1:1.84 1:2.14 1:1.78 1:2.58 1:1.14 1:0.91 1:1.41 1:2.42 1:1.94 1:3.03
Netherlands 1:1.56 1:1.38 1:1.77 1:4.06 1:3.57 1:4.61 1:1.45 1:1.25 1:1.67 1:3.90 1:3.35 1:4.53
N. Zealand 1:1.59 1:1.39 1:1.81 1:3.35 1:2.93 1:3.84 1:1.49 1:1.29 1:1.72 1:3.68 1:3.17 1:4.26
Norway 1:1.70 1:1.50 1:1.92 1:4.92 1:4.34 1:5.57 1:1.30 1:1.15 1:1.48 1:4.31 1:3.77 1:4.94
Portugal 1:1.76 1:1.51 1:2.06 1:5.01 1:4.29 1:5.85 1:2.33 1:1.95 1:2.77 1:7.09 1:5.93 1:8.48
Spain 1:1.43 1:1.25 1:1.64 1:3.07 1:2.67 1:3.53 1:3.31 1:1.13 1:1.53 1:2.64 1:2.26 1:3.09
Sweden 1:2.22 1:1.94 1:2.54 1:4.76 1:4.17 1:5.45 1:1.36 1:1.20 1:1.55 1:3.28 1:2.86 1:3.77
Switzerland 1:1.59 1:1.40 1:1.81 1:2.17 1:1.91 1:2.47 1:1.18 1:1.03 1:1.36 1:2.28 1:1.97 1:2.64
UK 1:1.64 1:1.45 1:1.84 1:4.14 1:3.26 1:4.14 1:1.50 1:1.32 1:1.69 1:4.08 1:3.58 1:4.65
USA 1:2.43 1:2.15 1:2.74 1:3.39 1:3.30 1:3.83 1:3.12 1:2.73 1:3.58 1:3.70 1:3.24 1:4.23

Shading indicates significant differences at ±95%.

Every country's neurological deaths worsened significantly in comparison with the control deaths.

This pattern was found for Female cancer and CDD neurological seventeen and nineteen countries, respectively.

3.5.6. Rates are statistics—numbers people

Mortality rates are “statistics,” whereas actual numbers of people can give a better feel to the practice reality of these increases.

In 1979, there were 28 261 American TND deaths of which 11 033 were in the 55‐74 age band. By 1989, these had risen to 65 656 and 16 677, respectively. By 2014, there were 405 187 TND deaths of which 44 825 people aged 55‐74 had died of a neurological condition. Thus, over 25 years, albeit within a growing elderly population, there were an “extra” 339 31 people dying from a neurological condition, of which an “extra” 28 148 were under 74 years old. Such numbers of people dying in such a relatively short time is an indication of the extent of the likely pressure on families and services.

4. CONCLUSIONS

4.1. Limitations to the study

Death rates depend upon the reliability of diagnosis, which some believe have resulted in higher specific diagnosis of ALS.14 However, as the measures are in the broad category of neurological diseases, this is less of a problem [1.5‐8]. The claims that increases in neurological morbidity are due to the Gompertzian effect15, 16, 17 is largely questionable, as the 55‐74 age band is below current Western life expectancy.23 Moreover, the fourfold rise in the American over‐75s TND rates, emerged from just a 49% increase of the elderly population counters a primarily Gompertzian explanation.

Finally, aggregated international studies cannot account for any particular country's substantial changes, which will require country‐specific research possibly requiring a geo‐epidemiology approach which involves detailed mapping of cases right down to houses in street locations.24

4.2. Main findings

We can reject all four null hypotheses as neurological deaths rose significantly more than the control deaths in every country and for both sexes. Furthermore, whilst no other country had greater rises in their neurological deaths than the USA, American male and female neurological deaths rose significantly more than twelve and seventeen countries, respectively, occurring only just 25 years. Furthermore, there was no positive statistical link between increases in neurological deaths and decreases in the control mortalities, which would have been expected if the Gompertzian was a strong factor. Moreover, compared with the earlier analyses between 1989 and 2010 where there were notable rises in males in six countries and in four countries for females, by 2014 there had been rises of equivalent to >10% in twelve countries for men and in eleven countries for females. A Gompertzian perspective also ignores rises in early onset dementia (EOD) reported in many countries.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 25 For example, one found 29% of their cohort were aged under 65 years, which 30 years before would have been considered extraordinary.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 25 Another indication of the extent of increased EOD is seen in examining Medline studies related to EOD. The first paper was published June 1967 by June 1987 there were 100 papers, whereas from January to December 2016, there were 299 directly or indirectly related to EOD, clearly whatever the multiple causal explanations, something has changed.

Moreover, the over‐75's TND results showed that the increases were essentially far in excess of rises in the over‐75's population. Whilst there may be some Gompertzian influences related to demography it does not appear to be the predominant factor, especially in the USA and nine other countries whose elderly population to TND rates produced odds ratios that had more than doubled.

The study adds confirmation that the changes noted at the end of the last century, are continuing, and despite the limitations, provides valid data for future research, whilst raising questions as to what might account for these global changes.

Although this study does not attempt to explain the reasons behind these increases, it is clear that the neurological morbidity is starting earlier and the reported rises are not primarily an artefact. There are confirmed rises of ALS from a number of Western clinical studies1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 25 as well as small increases in Asian and Latin American countries.18, 19

This is not to discount studies that identified genetic and familial patterns20, 21, 22 but others recognize lifestyle and possible interactive environmental contributions.2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 25 Including such factors as occupation, heavy metals, petro‐chemicals, organophosphate/pesticides26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and possible influence of electromagnetic field (EMF)18, 25, 31 and military service.32 Although not all studies related to ALS have consistently reported environmental factors,33 the majority have highlighted environmental factors rather than longevity4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 18, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 as well as epigenetic changes,33, 34, 35 whist recently, research had linked rises in dementias to proximity to major roads.30

This project is not equipped to explain the reasons behind these changes, but in view of the relatively short period, it is indicative that multi‐interactive environmental factors are probably having a greater influence.

Focusing only on the USA in 1989‐91, male neurological rates were ninth highest and are now second highest and American females moved from being twelfth to fourth highest. There is an urgent need to explain these remarkable changes.

At a practice level, both families and the medical specialities dealing with the concomitant problems of neurological disease are in danger of being overwhelmed. In particular, is issue of relatively younger neurological patients burden upon their families, complicated by the psychiatric and psychosocial problems associated with neurological disease. Moreover, until the extent of these changes is recognized the present configuration of services will be overwhelmed. Consequently, there is an urgent need for cross‐disciplinary research to understand the underlying interactive processes that contribute to rises in neurological morbidity and mortality and for the necessary community‐based support that will be needed until or if effective preventative and/or treatments can be introduced.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict or vested interest in this study.

Pritchard C, Rosenorn‐Lanng E, Silk A, Hansen L. Controlled population‐based comparative study of USA and international adult [55‐74] neurological deaths 1989‐2014. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;136:698–707. 10.1111/ane.12789

REFERENCES

  • 1. James BD, Leurgans SE, Hbert LE, Scheer PA, Yaffe K, Bennett DA. Contribution of Alzheimer disease to mortality in the United States. Neurology. 2014;82:1045‐1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kasai M, Nakamura K, Meguro K. Alzheimer's disease in Japan and other countries: review of the epidemiological studies in the last 10 years. Brain Nerve. 2010;62:667‐678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rizzi L, Rosset I, Roriz‐Cruz M. Global epidemiology of dementia: Alzheimer's and vascular types. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:908915 10.1155/2014/908915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Scialo C, Novi G, Bandettini D, et al. Clinical epidemiology of ALS in Liguria, Italy: an update of LIGALS register. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontalemporal Degener. 2016;11:1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pritchard C, Baldwin DS, Mayers A. Changing patterns of adult [45‐74 years] neurological deaths in the major Western world countries 1979‐97. Pub Health. 2004;116:1‐16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tobin K, Gilthorpe MS, Rooney J, et al. Age‐period‐cohort analysis of trends in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis incidence. J Neurol. 2016;263:1919‐1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pritchard C, Mayers A, Baldwin DS. Changing patterns of neurological mortality in the 10 major developed countries 1979‐2010. Pub Health. 2013;127:357‐368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pritchard C, Rosenorn‐Lanng E. Neurological deaths of American adults (55–74) and the over 75’s by sex compared with 20 Western countries 1989–2010: Cause for concern. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Panegyres PK, Chen HY. Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease: a global cross‐sectional analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:1149‐1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sanchez AM, Scharovsky D, Romano LM, et al., et al. Incidence of early‐onset demenatia in Mar del Plata. Neurologia. 2015;30:77‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kelley BJ, Boeve BF, Josephs KA. Young‐onset dementia: demographic and aetiological characteristics of 235 patients. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:1502‐1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Moura MC, Casulari LA, Carvalho Garbi MR. Ethnic and demographic incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in Brazil: a population based study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17:275‐281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shahrizaila N, Sobue G, Kuwabara S, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and motor neuron syndromes in Asia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:821‐830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Goldacre MJ, Duncan M, Griffith M, Turner MR. Trends in death certification for multiple sclerosis, motor neurone disease, Parkinson's disease and epilepsy in English populations 1979‐2006. J Neurol. 2010;257:706‐715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chio A, Magnani C, Schiffer D. Gompertzian analysis of ALS mortality in Italy 1957‐1987: application to birth cohorts. Neuroepidemiology. 1995;14:269‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Riggs JE, Schochet SS Jr. Rising mortality due to Parkinson’ disease & ALS: a manifestation of the competitive nature of human mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;45:1007‐1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Easton DM. Gompertzian growth and decay: a powerful descriptive tool for neuroscience. Physiol Behav. 2005;86:407‐414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Johnansen C. Electromagnetic fields and health effects—epidemiological studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia‐related heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(Supplement 1):1‐80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Maiovis P, Ioannidis P, Konstantinopoulus E, Karacostas D. Early onset dementias: demographic characteristics and aetiological classification in a tertiary referral centre. A Neurologica Belgica. 2016. Epub ahead publication. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cuyvers E, van der Zee J, Bettern K. Genetic variability in SQSTM1 and risk of early‐onset Alzheimer dementia: a European early‐onset dementia consortium study. Neurobiol Ageing. 2015;36:15‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Nilsson C, Lndqvist LM, Nilsson K, Santillio A, Vestberg S. Age‐related incidence and family history in frontotemporal dementia: data from the Swedish Dementia Registry. PLoS One. 2014;9:90‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nicolas G, Wallon D, Charbonnier C, et al. Screen of dementia genes by whole‐exome sequencing in early‐onset Alzheimer disease: input and lessons. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:710‐716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. World Health Organization . World Statistical Annual 11: 126‐139. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. www.whoint/whosis/mort/table1_process.cfm .
  • 24. Pritchard C, Silk A. A case‐study survey of an eight‐year cluster of motor neurone disease (MND) referrals in a rural English village: exploring possible aetiological influences in a hypothesis stimulating study. J Neurol Disord. 2014;2:1‐5.26225355 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hallberg O. A trend modal Alzheimer's disease. ADMET. 2015;3:281‐286. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Peters TL, Beard JD, Umbach D, Allen K, Keller J, et al. Blood levels of trace elements and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotoxicology. 2016;54:119‐126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gore AC. Neuro‐endocrine targets of endocrine disruptors. Hormones. 2010;9(16–2):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chang PA, Wu YJ. Motor neurone disease and neuro‐toxic substances: a possible link? Chem Biol Interact. 2009;180:127‐130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Callaghan B, Feldman D, Gruis K, Feldman E. The association of exposure to lead, mercury and selenium and the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the epigenetic implications. Neurodegener Dis. 2011;8:1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chen H, Kwong J, Copes R, Tu K, Villeneuve PJ, van Donkenlarn A. Living near major roads and the incidence of dementia, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;389:718‐726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32399-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. United States Department of Labor . “Controlling Electrical Hazards” revised 2002. Washington DC.
  • 32. Bergman BP, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Motor neurone disease and military service: evidence from the Scottish Veterans Health Study. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:877‐879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Rooney J, Vajda A, Heverin M, Crampsie A, Tobkin K. No association between soil constituents and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis relative risk in Ireland. Environ Res. 2016;147:102‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lunke S, El‐Osta A. The emerging role of epigenetic modifications and chromatin remodelling in spinal muscular atrophy. J Neurochem. 2009;109:1557‐1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gangisetty O, Murugan S. Epigenetic modifications in neurological disease: natural products as epigenetic modulators‐ a treatment strategy. Adv Neurobiol. 2016;12:1‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Neurologica Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES