Introduction
Schistosomiasis is considered the most important of the helminth diseases of humanity in terms of morbidity and mortality [1]. Although advances have been made in controlling the disease, long-term reduction remains elusive [2–5]. Schistosomiasis has re-emerged in southern Europe [6] where it had not been seen in recent times, unlike in more tropical endemic countries, including sub-Saharan Africa, the Maghreb, Egypt, and Brazil (http://www.thiswormyworld.org/worms/global-burden). These recent cases of schistosomiasis in higher latitudes suggest that global warming could influence the geographical range and snail susceptibility to infection as climate temperature increases.
The freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata has been studied for several years at the molecular level, mainly within the context of its interaction with the trematode Schistosoma mansoni for which it serves as the obligate intermediate host for asexual development of larval stages of the parasite. The genome sequence of B. glabrata has been reported [7], which reveals deep insights into the compatibility of this snail as a host for parasitism by S. mansoni. Analysis of the snail can be expected to further illuminate more deeply those molecular determinants of the snail that should give us insight into molecular interactions underlying the evolutionary success of this ancient relationship between the snail and schistosomes. Studies of comparative immunology relating to innate immunity have helped identify elements of invertebrate immunity that might also shape innate immunity in mammals. Hannington and colleagues recently reviewed this topic [8]. Here, we focus on aspects of the snail/schistosome relationship that could elucidate common pathways that enable both snails and humans to accommodate parasitism by schistosomes in the face of physiological and immunological environments.
Studies of the snail: Schistosome interaction and spatial epigenetics in human infectious disease and cancer
Schistosomes induce stress in susceptible snails during early infection [14]. This difference was monitored closely over 24 hours following infection by the miracidium of B. glabrata, which revealed that intact but not radiation-attenuated miracidia induce stress in the susceptible snails [9]. The excretory/secretory products (ESPs) of the miracidium include the stress-inducing factor. With released ESPs, studies performed using an in vitro coculture system that utilized the B. glabrata embryonic (Bge) cell line provided an opportunity to determine the effect of ESPs on interphase nuclei and nonrandom relocalization of gene loci and up-regulation of transcription after schistosome infection [15]. Subsequent investigation revealed that within a few minutes of invading the snail through the head-foot, schistosomes are capable of orchestrating, systemically, the nonrandom repositioning of specific gene loci in interphase nuclei of cells of the ovotestis (located in the posterior region of the snail), correlated positively with up-regulation of those specific genes [10]. Together, the phenomena observed with viable and attenuated schistosomes in snails that are either susceptible or resistant to infection revealed that the parasite coordinates the reorganization of the nuclear genome of its host, presumably to facilitate productive parasitism. Pathogenic bacteria and viruses can alter the epigenetic code of the host genome [11]. Epstein–Barr virus induces the repositioning of an entire chromosome in human B cells [12]. The consequences of altering gene location within nuclei include affecting its association with factors that regulate either gene expression or silencing [13]. Reorganization by a pathogen of the host genome could change the status of the gene expression profile in ways that facilitate infection [14].
How does this mechanism of pathogen-controlled genome reorganization facilitate productive parasitism by schistosomes in the snail B. glabrata? We speculate that signals from ESPs pass through cells from ESPs and are then communicated through the cytoskeletal network through the nuclear envelope, possibly via the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex. Once the signals reach the nucleus, epigenetic changes to the chromatin follow, in turn signaling specific gene loci to relocate to regions where transcription is up-regulated, for example, at a transcription factory [13]. Thus, the hypothesis we are following is that the parasite requires the gene products it has induced to become expressed for its own gain to elicit an infection. Our studies also revealed that the movement of the gene loci to new locations within the snail nuclei preceded the up-regulation of transcription of that particular gene [10]. Given that the gene encoding heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 moves early during infection [10, 15], we developed models that employ heat shock in both Bge cells and intact snails to recapitulate the repositioning of the BgHsp70 gene. We have found that BgHsp70 gene loci relocate to new nonrandom locations within 1 hour, followed by Hsp70 expression. These BgHsp70 gene loci move into transcription factories, delineated by accumulations of RNA polymerase II staining [14, 16]. We presume that this facilitates transcription; although, this is yet to be established by delineating RNA in situ. Gene and chromosome repositioning can be blocked with agents that block nuclear myosin polymerization and by RNA interference targeting function of nuclear motor proteins within interphase nuclei [17, 18]. Interference prevents the specific gene relocation with consequential rapid down-regulation of transcription of the BgHsp70 gene in snails stressed by heat shock (Fig 1).
Gene repositioning in B. glabrata by schistosomes represents the first reported example of the influence of a eukaryotic pathogen in hijacking the genome behavior of its host. Since relocation and reprograming of gene loci is known in other human diseases, particularly during malignancy, signaling pathways involved in this chromosomal spatial epigenetics might be conveniently studied either in the snail/schistosome interaction or our snail/heat shock model of stress response. Other reports revealed specific nonrandom gene repositioning in cancer [13, 19]. These new locations of specific genes are so similar between individuals and cells that the new patterns of gene position within interphase nuclei can be utilized for diagnosis and prognosis in breast and prostate cancer [20]. These relocalized cancer genes include members of the heat shock family of stress proteins as well as other genes not normally involved in immunological responses.
In preliminary studies, the analysis of expression of genes following infection of the snails with schistosomes revealed up-regulation of orthologues of cancer-related genes as an early (<60 min) response and could potentially be involved in chromatin reorganization. These included c-myc, which may participate in global genome reorganization [21, 22] and methyl transferases directly involved in chromatin remodeling. By contrast, both the genes snail1 and piwi were down-regulated in the schistosome-susceptible snails and up-regulated in resistant snails (Fig 2). Both encode proteins involved in maintenance of heterochromatin [23, 24]. Indeed, piwi interacts directly with HP1a [23]. If piwi and HP1a are down-regulated in susceptible snails, genomic regions in nuclei of the snail could become more plastic, releasing many transcripts for expression. Spontaneous infective solid tumors have been found in mollusks, such as clams and mussels [25, 26], and up-regulation of p53 and ras transcription was detected in the cockle Cerastoderma edule with neoplasia [27]. With escalating interest in genome reorganization, including malignancy, we posit that mapping molecular pathways leading to spatial epigenetics in the snail–schistosome model represents an organism worthy of consideration to elucidate interplays between restructure of the nuclear architecture and pathogenesis of disease, given that it is facile, informative, inexpensive, and of minimal ethical concern.
A model system for immunobiology in immunosuppression/immunostimulation involving stress proteins and lectins
Mechanism(s) used by lectins to influence the compatibility between the snail and schistosome are of increasing research focus [28–30]. These studies have shown that lectins from the snail and schistosomes are fundamental in compatibility issues. Lectins containing variable immunoglobulin domains, such as FREPs, have uncovered a sophisticated system of innate immunity that hinges on somatic rearrangement of these variable regions, leading to the diversification of these molecules. Variations in the structure and function contributing to a robust immune system against schistosomes in the snail offers the possibility of deciphering targets used to communicate via snail lectins to block infection. Recently, binding of stress protein Hsp70 to human siglecs 5 and 14 to either activate or suppress the immune system was reported [31]. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin like lectins (siglecs) are cell surface proteins that recognize sialoglycans [32]. Ongoing investigation is underway to characterize the association of Hsp70 of B. glabrata and snail homologs of siglecs to understand the connection between lectins, stress, and innate immunity. These studies provide a model whereby snail cell networks among existential stress proteins and lectins communicating in response to schistosomes could facilitate a better understanding of the role of these molecules in innate immunity in human and mammalian hosts of trematodes at large. Fig 3 presents an outline of a working model, reflecting the known situation in siglec-mediated signal transduction in human cells where Hsps are principal participants, binding lectin paralogues to either activate or suppress innate immune responses.
To conclude, model organisms have historically been used to simplify studies of complex mechanisms in cell and molecular biology. Mollusks including octopuses and the snails Aplysia californica, IIyannasa obsoleta, and Crepidula fornicate serve as models in neurobiology and developmental biology [33]. The availability of a reference genome, increasing molecular resources for functional genomics, and the Bge cell line establish B. glabrata as an informative model for investigation of complex pathways involved in nuclear/genome behavior associated with infectious diseases and cancer.
Acknowledgments
We thank Meredith Brindley and Michael Smith for assistance with illustrations.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Hotez PJ, Velasquez RM, Wolf JE Jr. Neglected tropical skin diseases: their global elimination through integrated mass drug administration? JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):481–2. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8759 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sokolow SH, Wood CL, Jones IJ, Swartz SJ, Lopez M, Hsieh MH, et al. Global Assessment of Schistosomiasis Control Over the Past Century Shows Targeting the Snail Intermediate Host Works Best. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(7):e0004794 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004794 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tchuem Tchuente LA, Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Molyneux D. Moving from control to elimination of schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa: time to change and adapt strategies. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(1):42 10.1186/s40249-017-0256-8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shiff C. Why reinvent the wheel? Lessons in schistosomiasis control from the past. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(10):e0005812 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005812 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fenwick A. Schistosomiasis research and control since the retirement of Sir Patrick Manson in 1914. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111(5):191–8. 10.1093/trstmh/trx036 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boissier J, Grech-Angelini S, Webster BL, Allienne JF, Huyse T, Mas-Coma S, et al. Outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in Corsica (France): an epidemiological case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(8):971–9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00175-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adema CM, Hillier LW, Jones CS, Loker ES, Knight M, Minx P, et al. Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15451 10.1038/ncomms15451 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pila EA, Li H, Hambrook JR, Wu X, Hanington PC. Schistosomiasis from a Snail's Perspective: Advances in Snail Immunity. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33(11):845–57. 10.1016/j.pt.2017.07.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ittiprasert W, Knight M. Reversing the resistance phenotype of the Biomphalaria glabrata snail host Schistosoma mansoni infection by temperature modulation. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002677 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002677 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arican-Goktas HD, Ittiprasert W, Bridger JM, Knight M. Differential spatial repositioning of activated genes in Biomphalaria glabrata snails infected with Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(9):e3013 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robert McMaster W, Morrison CJ, Kobor MS. Epigenetics: A New Model for Intracellular Parasite-Host Cell Regulation. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(7):515–21. 10.1016/j.pt.2016.04.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li C, Shi Z, Zhang L, Huang Y, Liu A, Jin Y, et al. Dynamic changes of territories 17 and 18 during EBV-infection of human lymphocytes. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37(5):2347–54. 10.1007/s11033-009-9740-y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bridger JM, Arican-Gotkas HD, Foster HA, Godwin LS, Harvey A, Kill IR, et al. The non-random repositioning of whole chromosomes and individual gene loci in interphase nuclei and its relevance in disease, infection, aging, and cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;773:263–79. 10.1007/978-1-4899-8032-8_12 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Knight M, Arican-Goktas HD, Ittiprasert W, Odoemelam EC, Miller AN, Bridger JM. Schistosomes and snails: a molecular encounter. Front Genet. 2014;5:230 10.3389/fgene.2014.00230 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Odoemelam E, Raghavan N, Miller A, Bridger JM, Knight M. Revised karyotyping and gene mapping of the Biomphalaria glabrata embryonic (Bge) cell line. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(6):675–81. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.11.011 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arican-Goktas HD. Parasitic Influences on the Host Genome Using the Molluscan Model Organism Biomphalaria glabrata. [Dissertation]. London, U.K.: Brunel University; 2013.
- 17.Foster HA, Griffin DK, Bridger JM. Interphase chromosome positioning in in vitro porcine cells and ex vivo porcine tissues. BMC Cell Biol. 2012;13:30 10.1186/1471-2121-13-30 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mehta IS, Amira M, Harvey AJ, Bridger JM. Rapid chromosome territory relocation by nuclear motor activity in response to serum removal in primary human fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 2010;11(1):R5 10.1186/gb-2010-11-1-r5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meaburn KJ. Spatial Genome Organization and Its Emerging Role as a Potential Diagnosis Tool. Front Genet. 2016;7:134 10.3389/fgene.2016.00134 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meaburn KJ, Agunloye O, Devine M, Leshner M, Roloff GW, True LD, et al. Tissue-of-origin-specific gene repositioning in breast and prostate cancer. Histochem Cell Biol. 2016;145(4):433–46. 10.1007/s00418-015-1401-8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Misteli T. Higher-order genome organization in human disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(8):a000794 10.1101/cshperspect.a000794 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kieffer-Kwon KR, Nimura K, Rao SSP, Xu J, Jung S, Pekowska A, et al. Myc Regulates Chromatin Decompaction and Nuclear Architecture during B Cell Activation. Mol Cell. 2017;67(4):566–78 e10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brower-Toland B, Findley SD, Jiang L, Liu L, Yin H, Dus M, et al. Drosophila PIWI associates with chromatin and interacts directly with HP1a. Genes Dev. 2007;21(18):2300–11. 10.1101/gad.1564307 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Millanes-Romero A, Herranz N, Perrera V, Iturbide A, Loubat-Casanovas J, Gil J, et al. Regulation of heterochromatin transcription by Snail1/LOXL2 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cell. 2013;52(5):746–57. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Diaz S, Cao A, Villalba A, Carballal MJ. Expression of mutant protein p53 and Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones in cockles Cerastoderma edule affected by neoplasia. Dis Aquat Organ. 2010;90(3):215–22. 10.3354/dao02231 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stokstad E. Cancer Biology. Infectious cancer found in clams. Science. 2015;348(6231):170 10.1126/science.348.6231.170 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ruiz P, Diaz S, Orbea A, Carballal MJ, Villalba A, Cajaraville MP. Biomarkers and transcription levels of cancer-related genes in cockles Cerastoderma edule from Galicia (NW Spain) with disseminated neoplasia. Aquat Toxicol. 2013;136–137:101–11. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.03.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dheilly NM, Duval D, Mouahid G, Emans R, Allienne JF, Galinier R, et al. A family of variable immunoglobulin and lectin domain containing molecules in the snail Biomphalaria glabrata. Dev Comp Immunol. 2015;48(1):234–43. 10.1016/j.dci.2014.10.009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mitta G, Gourbal B, Grunau C, Knight M, Bridger JM, Theron A. The Compatibility Between Biomphalaria glabrata Snails and Schistosoma mansoni: An Increasingly Complex Puzzle. Adv Parasitol. 2017;97:111–45. 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.08.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schultz JH, Adema CM. Comparative immunogenomics of molluscs. Dev Comp Immunol. 2017;75:3–15. 10.1016/j.dci.2017.03.013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fong JJ, Sreedhara K, Deng L, Varki NM, Angata T, Liu Q, et al. Immunomodulatory activity of extracellular Hsp70 mediated via paired receptors Siglec-5 and Siglec-14. EMBO J. 2015;34(22):2775–88. 10.15252/embj.201591407 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(4):255–66. 10.1038/nri2056 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goulding MQ, Lambert JD. Mollusc models I. The snail Ilyanassa. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;39:168–74. 10.1016/j.gde.2016.07.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]