Skip to main content
African Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to African Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2018 Jun 18;12(2):14–20. doi: 10.21010/ajid.v12i2.3

CARRIAGE OF MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT UROBACTERIA BY ASYMPTOMATIC PREGNANT WOMEN IN YENAGOA, BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA

Adebola Onanuga 1,*, Maureen Chinelo Omeje 1, Darlington Deboh Eboh 1
PMCID: PMC6085741  PMID: 30109281

Abstract

Background:

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in pregnancy are associated with significant morbidity for both mother and baby but its early detection and treatments can prevent unfavorable complications in pregnancy. This study therefore determined the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and antimicrobial resistance profile of the urinary bacteria among pregnant women in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Materials and Methods:

Mid-stream urine samples were collected from 201 apparently healthy pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Yenagoa. The samples were analyzed and the organisms identified using standard microbiological methods. Haemolysin production by the organisms was screened and their antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using standard assay methods.

Results:

A high significant bacteriuria of 119 (59.2%) was predominantly recovered from the pregnant women in their second and third trimesters. The bacteria isolated; Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus species had 36 – 67% of haemolysin producers. The bacteria exhibited a very high resistance to most of the antibiotics tested but the resistance to ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin was 28 – 67%. All the Staphylococcus species exhibited 90% and 85% resistance to cefoxitin (methicillin resistant) and vancomycin respectively. An 89 - 100% of the bacteria exhibited multiple antibiotic resistance and 72.3% of the screened bacteria phenotypically expressed Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamase production.

Conclusion:

The high prevalence of significant bacteriuria with high multi-drug resistance among the study pregnant women call for regular education on proper personal hygiene and the need for early screening for UTIs during antenatal clinics as means of controlling the spread of antibiotic resistant organisms and complications in pregnancy.

Keywords: Carriage, Multidrug Resistance, Urobacteria, Asymptomatic, Pregnant women, Yenagoa

Introduction

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) are one of the most common bacterial infections affecting humans of all age groups regardless of their genders in both community and hospital settings (Colgan et al., 2006). Urinary Tract Infections frequently occur due to the colonization and invasion of any part of the urinary tract by microorganisms with accompanying symptoms (Turpin et al., 2007; Okonko et al., 2009). The women particularly pregnant women are much more susceptible to UTIs partly because of their short and wide urethra which has close proximity to the anus thereby enhancing the upward movement of the rectal bacteria to the urethra thereby causing infections (Colgan et al., 2006; Enayat et al., 2008; Kolawole et al., 2009).

Asymptomatic bacteriuria, a condition of significant growth of urobacteria (at least 105 cfu/ml) in patient without urinary symptoms, commonly occurs with varying prevalence among people of different age groups, genders, sexual activities, socioeconomic status and with the presence of genitourinary abnormalities (Colgan et al., 2006; Enayat et al., 2008; Amin et al., 2009; Demilie et al., 2012). The development of urinary tract infection from asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy has been associated with the increased risk of preterm delivery, preeclampsia, low birth weight infants, maternal anemia and foetal mortality if left untreated (Enayat et al., 2008; Lane and Takhar, 2011; Girishbuabu et al., 2011).

The infecting bacteria that have been implicated in people with asymptomatic bacteriuria include Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus spp., Streptococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Enterobacter species, but Gram negative bacteria especially E. coli and Klebsiella species have been reported to be the most frequently encountered among healthy patients (Nicolle et al., 2005; Macejko and Schaeffer, 2007; Parveen et al., 2011; Demilie et al., 2012).

Early antimicrobial treatment of significant bacteriuria in pregnancy even when the mother has no clinical symptoms has been reported to significantly reduce the incidence of acute pyelonephritis and its consequent effects on mother and foetus by 80-90% (Nicolle et al., 2005; Turpin et al., 2007; Schnarr and Smaill, 2008; Smaill and Vazquez, 2015). However, the increasing emergence of multi-drug resistant bacteria among these pathogens is a major public health problem in the treatment of UTI especially among pregnant women who are restricted to only few safe first line antimicrobials, which may now be ineffective on the resistant pathogens thus, making the women’s treatment a difficult task (Loh and Sivalingam, 2007; Chakupurakal et al., 2010; Demilie et al., 2012).

The increasing changing rate of bacterial resistance to common anti-infective agents has generated varied recent literatures on the asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy globally, but similar report in this part of the country is very scarce. Therefore, we sought to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and antimicrobial resistance profile of the urinary bacteria among pregnant women in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, as a means of providing relevant health strategies for the management of pregnant women in this area.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

The pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics from June to September, 2015 in three General Hospitals/Health Centres in Yenagoa Metropolis of Bayelsa state were recruited into this cross sectional study. Yenagoa is the capital city of Bayelsa State in the South Southern part of Nigeria, which is situated on 4.92° North latitude, 6.26° East longitude and 86 meters elevation above the sea level. The major occupations of its inhabitants are civil service, farming, fishing, trading and schooling.

Settings and Ethical Approval

The study involved the collection of early morning catch of midstream urine from the antenatal women who were not on any antibiotic therapy for two weeks prior to the time of survey. The volunteers gave written informed consent and provided socio-demographic data such as age, stage of pregnancy, parity and history of UTIs by filling questionnaire. The study was approved by the ethical committees of the institution and hospitals prior to the commencement of the study.

Samples collection and Bacteriology

Each volunteer collected clean mid-stream urine samples into wide opened sterile universal bottles after being properly instructed on the procedure of collection without touching the skin. The urine samples were labeled appropriately and transported within two hours of collection in iced packs carrier to the laboratory. A 10 µL of each sample was aseptically transferred using a standard 10 µL micropipette onto a sterilized nutrient agar plate for the purpose of bacterial quantification and properly spread on the agar before incubated at 37°C for 24 hours for discrete colonies. The recovered colony count per sample was multiplied by 100 to get the total colony forming unit per ml (CFU/ml) and a sample with a total of 105 CFU/ml or more was regarded as having significant bacteriuria but otherwise was considered insignificant. The discrete colonies arising from each sample plate were separately streaked on Cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient agar (CLED), Eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) and Mannitol salt agar plates for proper identifying features of the various uropathogens. The isolates with characteristic features on these agar plates were identified using standard bacteriological protocols like Gram’s stain reaction and biochemical tests for Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, before storing at 4°C for further investigations.

Haemolysin Testing

The confirmed uropathogens were investigated for haemolysin production as a virulence trait by spot-inoculating each strain on blood agar plate which was prepared by mixing 5 ml of fresh human blood gently with sterile 100 ml of molten Nutrient agar before distributing into various plates. The spot-inoculated blood agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Thereafter the plates were observed for haemolytic effect of each of the strain on the red blood cells.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The overnight culture of each confirmed bacterial isolate was standardized to the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard suspension (1.5 x 108CFU/ml) using colony suspension method and the resultant microbial suspension was used to swab the surface of a dried Mueller-Hinton agar (MAST, UK). The antimicrobial susceptibility of each bacterial isolate was determined using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as specified by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2014). The following antimicrobial discs from MAST, UK were placed firmly on the surface of the inoculated Mueller Hinton agar; Amoxicillin/clavulanate 20/10 µg, Cefuroxime 30 µg, Ceftazidime 30 µg, Cefotaxime 30 µg, Gentamicin 10 µg, Ciprofloxacin 5 µg, Levofloxacin 5 µg, Ertapenem 10 µg, Co-trimoxazole 25 µg and Nitrofurantoin 300 µg for Gram negative bacteria while Ceftazidime and Cefotamine were replaced with Cefoxitin 30 μg and Vancomycin 2–16 μg/ml (using agar dilution method) for Gram positive bacteria. All the Mueller Hinton agar plates containing Gram negative bacteria were incubated at 37°C while those containing Staphylococcus species were incubated at 35°C for 24 hr. The zone diameter of inhibition around each antimicrobial disc was measured and interpreted using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute chart while the Staphylococcus isolates that were resistant to vancomycin at 2 μg/ml were subjected to 4–16 μg/ml concentrations (CLSI, 2014).

Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase (ESBL) Producing Organisms

The detection of ESBL enzymes was investigated phenotypically in E. coli and K. Pneumoniae isolates that were resistant to the tested third generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefotaxime) by subjecting them to combination discs of cefotaxime/clavulanic acid, ceftazidime/clavulanic acid, single discs of cefotaxime and ceftazidime on the same Mueller Hinton agar plates, and then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The isolate is said to be an ESBL producing organism, if the zone diameter difference between each antibiotic combination disc and its single disc on the organism’s plate is ≥ 5 mm (CLSI, 2014).

Statistical analysis

The groups differences were tested using the Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test when expected frequencies were too low), with the assumed level of statistical significance at a P < 0.05 while the strength and direction association or relationship was measured using the phi coefficient/Cramer’s V tests where applicable. Data was performed with SPSS for Windows, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

A total of 201 asymptomatic pregnant women belonging to age group range of 16 – 45 years with mean age of 28.7 years were investigated in this study. Majority of the study subjects were in the age group of 26 -35 years (60.7%) and the distribution of the foetal gestational age across the subjects’ age group is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

The distribution of foetal gestational age across the subjects’ age group

Age Group (years) No of Samples Number (%) of subjects in different gestational age

1-3 Months (First Trimester) 4-6 Months (Second Trimester) 7-9 Months (Third Trimester)
16-25 58 (28.9) 2 (3.4) 21 (36.2) 35 (60.3)
26-35 122 (60.7) 4 (3.3) 26 (21.3) 92 (75.4)
36-45 21 (10.4) 0 (0.0) 5 (23.8) 16 (76.2)

TOTAL 201 6 (3.0) 52 (25.9) 143 (71.1)

Of all the 201 screened samples of the asymptomatic pregnant women, 192 (95.5%) yielded positive bacterial growth and 119 (59.2%) of them had significant bacteriuria. The distribution of UTI (significant bacteriuria) across the subjects’ age groups was observed to be significantly higher among the 16 -25 and 26 – 35 age groups (P = 0.02 and 0.01 respectively) (Table 2). However, it is significantly lower during the first trimester period (P = 0.042) but higher during the last two trimesters (Table 3).

Table 2.

The distribution of significant bacteriuria among the subjects’ age groups

Age Group (Years) No. of Samples No. (%) with significant bacteriuria Chi- Square P - value
16-25 58 27 5.403 0.020*
26-35 122 81 6.643 0.010*
36-45 21 11 0.452 0.501

Total 201 119 (59.2)
*

Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

Table 3.

The distribution of significant bacteriuria among subjects’ gestational age

Gestational Age (Months) No. of Samples No. (%) with significant bacteriuria Chi- Square P - value
1 - 3 6 1 (16.7) 4.633 0.042**
4 - 6 52 28 (53.8) 0.834 0.361
7 - 9 143 90 (62.9) 2.859 0.091
Total 201 119 (59.2)
**

Statistically significant (P < 0.05), P –value calculated using Fisher exact method.

Notable bacteria were recovered from the samples with significant bacteriuria and a total of 60 (50.4%) of them were haemolysin producers as shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

The Isolation and haemolysin production of common urinary bacteria

Urinary bacteria No. of isolates No. (%) of haemolysin Producers
Escherichia coli 18 8 (44.4)
Klebsiella pneumoniae 45 16 (35.6)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 36 24 (66.7)
Staphylococcus species 20 12 (60.0)

TOTAL 119 60 (50.4)

The antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that all the bacteria generally exhibited high resistance to all the tested antimicrobial agents. However, 60 -72% of E. coli isolates were observed to be susceptible to ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. The Staphylococcus species showed 90% and 85% resistance to cefoxitin (methicillin resistant) and vancomycin respectively (Table 5).

Table 5.

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the volunteers’ urinary bacteria isolates

Antimicrobial Agent Number (%) of Resistant Isolates

Escherichia coli (N = 18) Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 45) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N = 36) Staphylococcus spp. (N = 20)
Amoxicillin/Clavulanate 15 (83.3) 36 (80.0) 29 (80.6) 15 (75.0)
Cefuroxime 13 (72.2) 37 (82.2) 31 (86.3) 11 (55.0)
Ceftazidime 5 (27.8) 30 (66.7) 21 (58.3)
Cefotaxime 13 (72.2) 37 (82.2) 27 (75.0)
Gentamicin 10 (55.6) 25 (55.6) 21 (58.3) 10 (50.0)
Ciprofloxacin 7 (38.9) 23 (51.1) 16 (44.4) 10 (50.0)
Co-trimoxazole 18 (100) 42 (93.3) 34 (94.4) 18 (90.0)
Tetracycline 18 (100) 42 (93.3) 36 (100) 18 (90.0)
Cefoxitin 18 (90.0)
Vancomycin 17 (85.0)

The phenotypic screening for ESBL producers among E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that exhibited resistance to both ceftazidime and cefotaxime revealed a total of 34 (72.3%) and its distribution is showed in Table 6.

Table 6.

The frequency of ESBL producer among the isolated enterobacteria

Urinary enterobacteria Number of isolates Number (%) of ESBL Producers
Escherichia coli 5 4 (80.0)
Klebsiella pneumoniae 42 30 (71.4)

Total 47 34 (72.3)

Multiple antibiotic resistance as defined by Magiorakus et al. (2012) was screened for among the bacterial isolates. The antimicrobial agents used in this study can be grouped into seven classes of antibiotics which include the penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, folate antagonists, tetracyclines and glycopeptides. The rate of multiple antibiotic resistance among the studied isolates was 89 -100% (Table 7).

Table 7.

Multi-drug resistance pattern of isolated Urinary bacteria

Resistance to classes of antibiotics Number (%) of resistant Isolates

Escherichia coli N = 18 Klebsiella pneumoniae N = 45 Pseudomonas aeruginosa N = 36 Staphylococcus spp. N = 20
0 0 2 1 2
1 0 1 1 0
2 0 1 2 0
3 3 3 2 1
4 6 12 9 2
5 6 6 6 5
6 3 20 15 0
7 - - - 10

≥ 3 18 (100) 41 (91.1) 32 (88.9) 18 (90)

Discussion

Urinary tract infections are probably the most widely spread infections of the world which require proper investigations and prompt treatments in order to prevent serious life threatening complications and morbidity among vulnerable human populations like pregnant women and their unborn children (Musbau et al., 2013).

The study revealed that the pregnant women poorly attended antenatal clinics in the first trimester periods of their pregnancies but majority of them only visited the clinics in their third trimester periods irrespective of whether they had previous birth delivery or not. This observation cut across all the age groups but was more prevalent among those in the 36 – 45 years age group. The reason for this behaviour might be partly due to the fact that many of them never discovered that they were pregnant probably until when the signs became more obvious around 3 – 4 months of the pregnancy. It may also be that many deliberately waited till the pregnancy is advanced before seeking medical attention because of personal reasons and lack of finance. In fact, there are a number of women in the community who never visited antenatal clinics but only come to hospital to deliver their babies when they can no longer manage the situation in their various homes because of poverty. The consequences of this observed behaviour is enormous leading to stillbirth, foetal and maternal mortality.

The prevalence of significant bacteriuria among the study volunteers was significantly higher among the 16 – 35 years age group than those of the 36 – 40 years age group (P < 0.05). The women in the 26 – 35 years age group had a stronger statistical significance with a prevalence rate of 66.4% significant bacteriuria. This suggests that high sexual activities of this group might have highly predisposed them to significant bacteriuria being the most sexually active group among the study subjects since it has been reported that rate of bacteriuria in women increases with increase in sexual activities and use of contraceptives (Parveen et al., 2011; Amala and Nwokah, 2015). This findings support previous reports of positive cases of bacteriuria in pregnancy among women age group of 26 – 35 years (Rajshekhar and Umashenkar, 2013; Amala and Nwokah, 2015). This observed condition might develop into a disease condition termed “honey moon cystitis” which is used to describe a high association between bacteriuria and sexual activities in young married women that can lead to unfavorable pregnancy outcomes and complications (Colgan et al., 2006; Demilie et al., 2012).

Significant bacteriuria was most prevalent among the women in their second and third trimester periods of their pregnancy. This might be due to the combination of mechanical, hormonal and physiological changes during pregnancy which make the ureters to dilate progressively till delivery period thereby exposing them to urinary tract infections (Delzell and Lefevre, 2000; Taher, et al., 2009; Kawser et al., 2011). This observation supports the findings of many researchers who reported higher prevalence of UTI in pregnancy during the second and third trimester of pregnancy (Al- Haddad, 2005; Okonko et al., 2009; Parveen et al., 2011). However, the findings of Turay et al. (2014) who reported a higher prevalence of bacteriuria during the first trimester period of pregnancy disagreed with our findings. This might be as a result of the difference in the personal hygiene conditions of the individuals in the study areas. Hence, the education of pregnant women on the importance of proper personal hygiene and starting antenatal clinic at the early stage of pregnancy is crucial to the avoidance of infections and complications in pregnancy.

Notable bacteria that are commonly implicated in urinary tract infections were recovered from the asymptomatic volunteers with the enterobacteriaceae being the commonest group of bacteria as it has been widely reported (Demilie et al., 2012; Kerure et al., 2013; Sujatha and Nawani, 2014). The relatively high detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a widely encountered opportunistic bacterium suggests the possibility of poor personal hygiene among the pregnant women. Also, the high prevalence of haemolysin production (a virulence trait) observed among all the isolated bacteria suggests the possibility of appreciable proportion of these pregnant women developing symptomatic UTIs.

The antimicrobial susceptibility screening of these bacteria revealed their exhibition of very high resistance to the commonly used antibiotics and this has been widely reported in many developing countries (Biadglegne and Aber, 2009; Anyadoh et al., 2010; Rene et al., 2012; Gyasi-Sarpong et al., 2014). The moderately high resistance (39 – 58%) of these bacteria to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin, the antibiotics which were among the last resort in the treatment of multidrug resistant bacterial infections in this environment, calls for a serious health concern especially among these individuals in whom the drugs are contraindicated because of the drugs’ serious side effects to the foetus. The reports on the increasing resistance of these organisms to these agents is however on the increase and this call for the need to search for more effective antimicrobial agents either as crude or pure herbal medicaments against multidrug resistant organisms (Demilie et al., 2012; Gyasi-Sarpong et al., 2014; Anyadoh-Nwadike et al., 2015; Onanuga and Selekere, 2016). The observed high multiple antibiotic resistance (89 – 100%) in this study might probably be due to a very high proportion (72.3%) of phenotypically expressed ESBL enzymes among the screened Gram negative bacteria isolates since reports have shown that ESBL producing bacteria possess resistance determinants to many other important groups of antibiotics (Hyle et al., 2005; Melzer and Petersen, 2007; Akinjogunla et al., 2010; Onanuga and Selekere, 2016). Thus, the need for concerted efforts to control the spread of antibiotic resistance through education on rational use of antibiotics in both human and agricultural endeavours, and proper personal hygiene cannot be overemphasized.

In conclusion, the high prevalence of significant bacteriuria in this study necessitate the need to include routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria and treatment for UTIs as an essential part of antenatal care in pregnancy in order to prevent obstetric complications, whilst the high prevalence of multidrug resistance in the study show the need to constantly educate the pregnant women during their antenatal health talk on the practice of proper hand washing techniques and rational use of antibiotics as a lifestyle, as a means of controlling antibiotic resistance in our society.

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our profound gratitude to all pregnant women who voluntarily participated in this research study and the management of the General Hospital/Health Centres for granting us the permission to use their institutions for this research.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Akinjogunla O.J, Odeyemi A.T, Olasehinde G.I. Epidemiological studies of urinary tract infection among Post-menopausal women in Uyo Metropolis, South-South, Nigeria. Journal of American Science. 2010;6(12):1674–1681. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Haddad A.M. Urinary tract infection among pregnant women in Al-Mukalla district, Yemen. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2005;11(3):505–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amala S.E, Nwokah E.G. Prevalence of Asymtomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal in Port Harcourt Township, Nigeria and Antibiogram of Isolated Bacteria. American Journal of Biomedical Sciences. 2015;7(2):125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amin F.N, Rooshan M.H, Ahmady M.H, Sohamani M.J. Hygiene practices and sexual activity associated with urinary tract infection in pregnant women. East Mediterranean Health Journal. 2009;15(1):104–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anyadoh S.O, Akerele J, Udum U.I. Prevalence of multi-drug resistantEscherichia Coliamong pregnant women attending Ante-Natal Clinics in Owerri Imo State NIGERIA. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Technology. 2010;3(3):17–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anyadoh-Nwadike S.O, Okorondu S.I, Obiajuru I.O.C, Nwadike P.O, Nwaokorie F.O, Akerele J.O. Comparative Study of the Prevalence and Antibiogram of Bacterial Isolates from the Urinary and Genital Tracts of Antenatal Patients. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 2015;10(1):15–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Biadglegne F, Abera B. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections at Felge Hiwot Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Devevopment. 2009;23:236–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chakupurakal R, Ahmed M, Sobithadevi D.N, Chinnappan S, Reynolds T. Urinary tract pathogens and resistance pattern. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2010;63:652–654. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.074617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (2014):Performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Twenty-fourth informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. 34(1):M100–S24. pages 67-68. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colgan R, Nicolle L.E, McGlone A, Hooton T.M. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults. American Family Physician. 2006;74(6):985–990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Delzell J.E, Lefevre M.L. Urinary tract infections during pregnancy. American Family Physician. 2000;61(3):713–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Demilie T, Beyene G, Melaku S, Tsegaye W. Urinary Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Pregnant Women in North West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences. 2012;22(2):121–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Enayat K, Fariba F, Bahram N. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women referred to Outpatient Clinics in Sanandaj, Iran. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2008;34(6):699–707. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000600004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Girishbuabu R.J, Srikrishna R, Ramesh S.T. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. International Journal of Biology & Medical Research. 2011;2(3):740–742. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gyasi-Sarpong C.K, Nkrumah B, Yenli E.M.T, Appiah A.A, Azorliade R, Kolekang A.S, Ali I. Resistance pattern of uropathogenic bacteria in males with lower tract obstruction in Kumasi, Ghana. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014;8(36):3324–3329. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hyle E.P, Lipworth A.D, Zaoutis T.E, Nachamkin I, Fishman N.O, Bilker W.B, Mao X, Lautenbach E. Risk factors for increasing multidrug resistance among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producingEscherichia coliandKlebsiellaspecies. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40:1317–1324. doi: 10.1086/429239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kawser P, Afroza M, Arzumath A.B, Monowara B. Prevalence of urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Journal of Dhaka National Medical College Hospital. 2011;17(2):8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kerure S.B, Surpur R, Sagarad S.S, Hegadi S. Aymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women. International Journal of Contraceptives Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2:213–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kolawole A.S, Kolawole O.M, Kandaki-Olukemi Y.T, Babatunde S.K, Durowade K.A, Kolawole C.F. Prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTI) among patients attending Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Medicinal and Medical Sciences. 2009;1(5):163–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lane D.R, Takhar S.S. Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 2011;29(3):539–552. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loh K.Y, Sivalingam N. Urinary Tract infections in Pregnancy. Malaysian Family Physician. 2007;2(2):54–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Macejko A.M, Schaeffer A.J. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Urology Clinics of North America. 2007;34(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Magiorakos A.P, Srinivasan A, Carey R.B, Carmeli Y, Falagas M.E, Giske C.G, Harbarth S.J, Hindler J.F, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson D.L, Rice L.B, Stelling J, Struelens M.J, Vatopoulos A, Weber J.T, Monnet D.L. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria:an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012;18(3):268–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Melzer M, Petersen I. Mortality following bacteraemic infection caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producingE. colicompared to non-ESBL producingE. coli. Journal of Infections. 2007;55:254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Musbau S, Muhammad Y. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women. School Journal of Applied Medical Science. 2013;1(5):658–660. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nicolle L.E, Bradley S, Colgan R, Rice J.C, Schaeffer A, Hooton T.M. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40:643–54. doi: 10.1086/427507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okonko I.O, Ijandipe L.A, Ilusanya O.A, Donbraye-Emmanuel O.B, Ejembi J, Udeze A.O, Egun O.C, Fowotade A, Nkang A.O. Incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) among pregnant women in Ibadan, South-Western Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;8(23):6649–6657. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Onanuga A, Selekere T.L. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance of common urinary bacteria from asymptomatic students of Niger Delta University, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Journal of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences. 2016;8:29–33. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.171684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parveen K, Momen A, Begum A.A, Begum M. Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection during Pregnancy. Journal of Dhaka National Medical College and Hospital. 2011;17(2):8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rajshekhar D.K, Umashanker Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. 2013;5(11):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.René F.K.P, Jonas K, Patrice M, Diane Y, Adamou N, Pierre W.J, Louo S. Antibiotic Resistance inEscherichia coliIsolated from Women Genitalia and Trend of Minimal Inhibiting Concentration in a Semi-Urban Population:Bangangté, West-Cameroon. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;4(6):696–701. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schnarr J, Smaill F. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infections in pregnancy. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008;38(S2):50–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smaill F.M, Vazquez J.C. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;8:CD000490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sujatha N, Nawani M. Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and its Antibacterial Susceptibility Pattern Among Pregnant Women Attending the Antenatal Clinic at Kanpur, India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(4):1–3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6599.4205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Taher Aseel M, Al-Meer F.M, Al-Kuwari M.G, Ismail M.F. Prevalence and Predictors of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women Attending Primary Health Care in Qatar. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. 2009;7:10–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turay A.A, Eke S.O, Oleghe P.O, Ozekhome M.C. The prevalence of urinary tract infections among pregnant women attending antenatal Clinic at Ujoelen Primary Health Care Centre, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Basic, Applied and Innovative Research. 2014;3(1):86–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Turpin C.A, Minkah B, Danso K.A, Frimpong E.H. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women attending Antenatal Clinic At Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal. 2007;41(1):26–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of African Traditional Herbal Medicine Supporters Initiative

RESOURCES