Abstract.
Although numerous viruses are transmitted by mosquitoes, four have caused the most human suffering over the centuries and continuing today. These are the viruses causing yellow fever, dengue, chikungunya, and Zika fevers. Africa is clearly the ancestral home of yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika viruses and likely the dengue virus. Several species of mosquitoes, primarily in the genus Aedes, have been transmitting these viruses and their direct ancestors among African primates for millennia allowing for coadaptation among viruses, mosquitoes, and primates. One African primate (humans) and one African Aedes mosquito (Aedes aegypti) have escaped Africa and spread around the world. Thus it is not surprising that this native African mosquito is the most efficient vector of these native African viruses to this native African primate. This makes it likely that when the next disease-causing virus comes out of Africa, Ae. aegypti will be the major vector to humans.
Mosquito-borne viruses (arboviruses) have been afflicting humans for millennia and continue to cause immeasurable suffering. While not the only mosquito-borne viruses, the following four have been the most widespread and notorious in terms of severity of diseases and number of humans affected: the viruses causing yellow fever (YFV), dengue fever (DENV), chikungunya fever (CHIKV), and Zika fever (ZIKV). One enigma concerning these four viruses is that a single mosquito (out of more than 3,500 species), Aedes aegypti, has been the vector causing almost all major epidemics outside Africa. Here I discuss why this is the case and how this informs control of these diseases and what it means for stemming future arbovirus pandemics.
MOSQUITOES
For a mosquito to be a major vector of a human pathogen it must readily use humans as a source of blood meals and live in high densities in close association with humans over a wide geographic area. Many mosquitoes fulfill these criteria. But there is a third criterion: it must allow a human pathogen to grow and infect its saliva. Owing to the limited life span of female mosquitoes, the faster this occurs, the better the vector. For the four arboviruses mentioned, Ae. aegypti is the single species outside Africa that best fulfills all these criteria to be an efficient vector.1–3 This is likely because of evolutionary history.
Aedes aegypti is native to Africa where ancestral populations can still be found breeding in forests and ecotones with larvae in tree holes and adults preferring nonhumans for blood meals.4,5 When humans began living in villages and towns in Africa, they started storing water in containers year around, making this an attractive mosquito larval breeding site especially during prolonged dry seasons. Aedes aegypti was the African Aedes mosquito to exploit this new niche. Females eclosing from containers in villages evolved a preference for blood meals from the most available source: humans. It is this “domesticated” form of Ae. aegypti that spread to occupy tropical and subtropical human habitats in six continents today.6,7
The timeline for the spread of Ae. aegypti is reasonably clear and is consistent with epidemiologic records. Beginning in the sixteenth century, European ships to the New World stopped in West Africa to pick up native Africans for the slave trade8 and very likely picked up Ae. aegypti and YFV. The first well-documented New World yellow fever epidemics were in Yucatan and Havana in 1648.9 Asian populations of Ae. aegypti are derived from the New World more recently, on the order of 200 years ago.7,10,11 The Mediterranean could well have been an intermediate stop with the introduction to Asia instigated by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869. The first urban dengue fever in Asia was in the 1890s and chikungunya in 1879.12,13
PRIMATE HOSTS
Humans also first arose in Africa. There is little doubt that man’s closest living relative is the chimpanzee14 from which it diverged 6–10 million years ago.15 Tatersall16 states that “… over the past 2 million years the continent has regularly pumped out new kinds of hominid into other areas of the Old World.” Anatomically modern hominids generally agreed to be Homo sapiens appear in Africa 200,000–300,000 years ago.17,18 This lineage is thought to have left Africa 60–100,000 years ago and replaced (or hybridized with) other hominids throughout the world.19
THE VIRUSES
Determining the geographic origin of viruses is more difficult than for mosquitoes or primates, nevertheless, there is very good evidence that YFV, CHIKV, and ZIKV are all ancestral to Africa and, although less clear, DENV is likely African in origin.
There are no records of yellow fever existing outside Africa before 1500. Europeans arriving in Africa in the 1300s suffered from yellow fever whereas native Africans often exhibited immunity because of previous exposure.20 Molecular analyses of the virus genome confirms an African origin dating back at least 1,500 years.21 YFV is known to be transmitted among nonhuman primates by at least 10 native African Aedes other than Ae. aegypti.22
CHIKV was first isolated in 1952 in Tanzania.23 A disease recognizable as chikungunya fever is quite clearly described in Asia after 1879,13 10 years after the opening of the Suez Canal hypothesized to have allowed Ae. aegypti to enter Asia. Since, CHIKV has spread widely in Asia and more recently in the New World, first detected in 2013.24 Outside Africa, Ae. aegypti is the major mosquito-vectoring CHIKV, although Aedes albopictus can also cause epidemics.25 In CHIKV’s native Africa, in addition to Ae. aegypti, seven other native African Aedes have been implicated as vectoring CHIKV among African primates.26,27
ZIKV was first isolated in Uganda in 1947 from a monkey and Aedes africanus in the Ziika Forest near Entebbe.28 It caused sporadic outbreaks of mild febrile diseases in Africa for the next 60 years. ZIKV was isolated from an Ae. aegypti mosquito in Asia in the 1960s.29 But it was only in 2007 that hundreds of severe human cases are reported in Asia (Micronesia).30 ZIKV’s arrival in Brazil in 2015 set off worldwide concern, if not panic. Zika fever in the New World coincides with the distribution of Ae. aegypti. In addition to Ae. aegypti, ZIKV has been isolated from seven other native African Aedes.31
Dengue (DENV) presents a less clear picture of origin. Dengue as a human disease is difficult to unambiguously diagnose before modern medical technologies. A disease with some characteristics of dengue is recorded in the early 1600s in the Caribbean and Panama,32 about the same time as the first yellow fever and after Ae. aegypti was introduced. Unambiguous dengue is described for the first time almost simultaneously in Africa, Asia, and the Americas in 1779–1788.12,32
Unlike the other viruses, DENV was in Asia in the 1700s before Ae. aegypti arrived in the late nineteenth century.33,34 Thus, a mosquito other than Ae. aegypti must have been transmitting DENV in Asia, Ae. albopictus, the “Asian tiger mosquito,” being the most likely candidate for human transmission in Asia at that time.35 Aedes albopictus is a native Asian mosquito that readily bites humans and can live in close association with humans, although generally not as “urbanized” as Ae. aegypti.
As to nonhuman circulation of DENV, there is clearly an African primate, sylvan cycle with three African Aedes (in addition to Ae. aegypti) known to transmit DENV to nonhuman primates.36 Evidence for a nonhuman dengue virus cycle in Asia is less clear. Although flavivirus-neutralizing antibodies (attributed to DENV) were detected in arboreal primates in Malaysia, no live virus was isolated from Asian nonhuman primates except from caged monkeys exposed in the canopy of forests in the 1970s and 1980s37 after Ae. aegypti was in Malaysia. Although a DENV-4 isolate has been made from Aedes neveus,38 no DENV was found in over 25,000 other arboreal mosquitoes tested in Malaysia.37
Although it is generally thought that the four serotypes of DENV circulating today arose in Asia,22,36 this has occurred quite recently. A good case can be made that before this time (> 300 years ago), ancestral DENV was in Africa. Phylogenetic relationships of flaviviruses are a strong argument for this: DENV is in a clade of viruses most of which are known to be African (Figure 1).39 The branch leading to present day serotypes of DENV was an African lineage closely related to ZIKV. So even if the diverse serotypes of DENV were not all African in origin, it is very likely that further back in time, DENV’s predecessors were in Africa. So like the other three viruses, this implies DENV (or its immediate ancestors) had a long history of transmission by African mosquitoes to African primates.
Implications for public health.
Two important conclusions can be drawn from these observations.
First, given that a single mosquito is the primary vector of multiple human diseases, rather than fighting each disease individually as it comes to the fore, control the single mosquito species. This begs the question of just what it means to “control” a mosquito. It is not the purpose here to review or suggest mosquito control methods, rather to point out that multiple diseases can be reduced or eliminated by targeting a single mosquito.
Second, when the next Zika-like epidemic hits, it is likely to be caused by a virus now present in Africa and will be transmitted to humans primarily by Ae. aegypti. History predicts this. Are there more such viruses in Africa? Owing to the efforts of the Rockefeller Foundation, collections of more than 4,000 mosquito virus isolates were amassed, the majority from Africa.40 The four discussed here are only the tip of the iceberg of African mosquito–borne viruses. And these are the known mosquito-borne viruses. One can only speculate on how many mosquito-borne viruses lurk in Africa and how many cause diseases in African primates like man. So by controlling Ae. aegypti, not only would the major mosquito-borne viral diseases presently afflicting humans be controlled, but also future emergence of new viruses from Africa would be stopped or at least inhibited.
Acknowledgments:
Scott Ritchie made insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Comments by an anonymous reviewer and the editor help improve the presentation.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ritchie SA, 2014. Dengue vector bionomics: why Aedes aegypti is such a good vector. Gubler D, ed. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, 2nd edition. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: CAB International, 455–480. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lambrechts L, Scott TW, Gubler D, 2010. Consequences of the expanding global distribution of Aedes albopictus for dengue virus transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barrett DT, Higgs S, 2007. Yellow fever: a disease that has yet to be conquered. Annu Rev Entomol 52: 209–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lounibos LP, 1981. Habitat segregation among African treehole mosquitoes. Ecol Entomol 6: 129–154. [Google Scholar]
- 5.McBride CS, Baier F, Omondi AB, Spitzer SA, Lutomiah J, Sang R, Ignell R, Vosshall LB, 2014. Evolution of mosquito preference for humans linked to an odorant receptor. Nature 515: 222–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Powell JR, Tabachnick WJ, 2013. History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti—a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108 (Suppl 1): 11–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gloria-Soria A, et al. 2016. Global genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti. Mol Ecol 25: 5377–5395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eltis D, Richardson D, 2010. Atlas of the Transatlatic Slave Trade. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patch R, 1996. Sacraments and disease in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, 1648–1727. Historian 58: 731–743. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brown JE, Evans B, Zheng W, Obas V, Barrera-Martinez L, Egizi A, Zhao H, Caccone A, Powell JR, 2014. Human impacts have shaped historical and recent evolution in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever mosquito. Evolution 68: 514–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Crawford JE, Alves JM, Palmer WJ, Day JP, Sylla M, Ramasamy R, Surendran SN, Black WC IV, Pain A, Jiggins FM, 2017. Population genomics reveals that an anthropophilic population of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in west Africa recently gave rise to American and Asian populations of this major disease vector. BMC Biol 15: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gubler DJ, 2004. The changing epidemiology of yellow fever and dengue, 1900 to 2003: full circle? Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 27: 319–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weaver SC, Lecuit M, 2015. Chikungunya virus and the global spread of a mosquito-borne disease. N Engl J Med 372: 1231–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Caccone A, Powell JR, 1989. DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution 43: 925–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.White TD, Asfaw B, Beyene Y, Haile-Selassie Y, Lovejoy CO, Suwa G, WoldeGabriel G, 2009. Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominids. Science 326: 75–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tatersall I, 2009. Human origins: out of Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 16018–16021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McDougall I, Brown FH, Fleagle JG, 2005. Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia. Nature 433: 733–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hublin JJ, et al. 2017. New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens. Nature 546: 289–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Armitage SJ, Jasim SA, Marks AE, Parker AG, Usik VI, Uerpmann HP, 2011. The southern route “out of Africa”: evidence for an early expansion of modern humans into Arabia. Science 331: 453–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McNeill WH, 1976. Plagues and Peoples. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bryant JE, Holmes EC, Barrett AD, 2007. Out of Africa: a molecular perspective on the introduction of yellow fever virus into the Americas. PLoS Pathog 3: e75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hanley KA, Monath TP, Weaver SC, Rossi SL, Richman RL, Vasilakis N, 2013. Fever versus fever: the role of host and vector susceptibility and interspecific competition in shaping the current and future distributions of the sylvatic cycles of dengue virus and yellow fever virus. Infect Genet Evol 19: 292–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ross RW, 1956. The Newala epidemic. III. The virus: isolation, pathogenic properties and relationship to the epidemic. J Hyg (Lond) 54: 177–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leparc-Goffart I, Nougairede A, Cassadou S, de Lamballerie X, 2014. Chikungunya in the Americas. Lancet 383: 514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pialoux G, Gauzere B-A, Jaureguiberry S, Strobel M, 2007. Chikungunya, an epidemic arbovirosis. Lancet Infect Dis 7: 319–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jupp PG, McIntosh BM, 1990. Aedes furcifer and other mosquitoes as vectors of chikungunya virus at Mica, northeastern Transvall, South Africa. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6: 415–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jupp PG, McIntosh BM, Dos Santos I, DeMoor P, 1981. Laboratory vector studies on six mosquito and one tick species with chikungunya virus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 75: 15–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ, 1952. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46: 509–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marchette NJ, Garcia R, Rudnick A, 1969. Isolation of Zika virus from Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 18: 411–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayes E, 2009. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 1347–1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Faye O, Faye O, Diallo D, Dialo M, Weidmann M, Sall AA, 2013. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of Zika virus and evaluation with field-caught mosquitoes. Virol J 10: 311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gubler DJ, 1997. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: its history and resurgence as a global public health problem. Gubler D, Kuno G, eds. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever London, United Kingdom: CAB International, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 33.McSheery J, 1993. VIII.33 - Dengue. Kilple KF, ed. The Cambridge World History of Human Disease Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 660–664. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mayer SV, Tesh RB, Vasilakis N, 2017. The emergence of arthropod-borne viral diseases: a global perspective on dengue, chikungunya and Zika fevers. Acta Trop 166: 155–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Smith CEG, 1956. The history of dengue in tropical Asia and its probably relationship to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Trop Med Hyg 59: 243–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vasilakis N, Cardosa J, Hanley KA, Holmes EC, Weaver SC, 2011. Fever from the forest: prospects for the continued emergence of sylvatic dengue virus and its impact on public health. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 532–941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rudnick A, 1965. Studies of ecology of dengue in Malaysia: a preliminary report. J Med Entomol 2: 203–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rudnick A, 1986. Dengue virus ecology in Malaysia. Inst Med Res Malays Bull 23: 51–152. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gaunt MW, Sall AA, de Lamballerie X, Falconar AKI, Dzhivanian TI, Gould EA, 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of flaviviruses correlate with their epidemiology, disease association and biogeography. J Gen Virol 82: 1867–1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Murphy FA, Calisher CH, Tesh RB, Walker DH, 2004. In memoriam: Robert Ellis Shope: 1929–2004. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 762–765. [Google Scholar]