Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2018 Aug 6;4(8):e00716. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00716

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia

Ayalew Assefa a,∗, Amare Bihon b
PMCID: PMC6086211  PMID: 30105310

Abstract

Escherichia coli is one of the causes of gastrointestinal diseases worldwide causing millions of illness annually. The occurrence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia is arguably high due to many reasons like illegal slaughtering of animals in open fields, unhygienic slaughter practices in the abattoirs, and the risk of disease due to this organism is high because of a widespread tradition of raw meat consumption. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool estimates of the prevalence of the organism in different foods of animal origin which is the first of its kind in the country. The literature search was conducted to identify all published articles reporting the prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin. From all screened articles, 30 studies were eligible for final systematic review and meta-analysis. Because substantial heterogeneity was expected, random-effects meta-analyses were carried out to pool the prevalence of the organism from different foods of animal origin. The result indicated that between-study variability was high (τ2 = 0.00; heterogeneity I2 = 96.77% with Heterogeneity chi-square = 1298.92, a degree of freedom = 42 and a P-value of = 0.001) with the overall random pooled prevalence of 15% (95% CI = 13%–17%) in foods of animal origin. The result of meta-regression showed diagnosis method used, sample size and study year had contributed significantly to the heterogeneity of studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed the level of contamination of foods of animal origin in Ethiopia is high indicating the need for immediate planning of mitigation strategies and detection methods to reduce its level and impact throughout the country.

Keywords: Infectious disease, Public health, Food safety

1. Introduction

Foodborne pathogens including Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella species, Staphylococcus aureus, and many more other organisms are the leading causes of foodborne illness and death in the world (Ajayi et al., 2011). The reason for the increased risk can be attributed to many reasons which include but not limited to changes in eating habits, mass catering, complex and lengthy food supply procedures with increased international movement and poor hygiene practices. Foodborne zoonotic diseases often occur due to the consumption of contaminated food-stuffs especially from animal products such as meat and milk (Bevilacqua et al., 2017; Lopez-Campos et al., 2012).

Escherichia coli is characterized as a gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae with five virulence groups, including; enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), and enterotoxigenic (ETEC). Escherichia coli O157: H7, one of the virulent strain under the species Escherichia coli is a leading cause of hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in man (Cobbaut et al., 2009; Earley and Leonard, 2006). This strain is considered as one of the severe foodborne disease-causing organism globally. The risk and consequences of the organism are severe in developing countries due to different reasons that are attributable to poor livelihood in general. The food types most commonly associated with outbreaks of food poisoning due to Escherichia coli O157 are mostly of bovine origin, in particular, beef and beef burgers and unpasteurized milk (Hussein et al., 2001; Pennington, 2010; Söderlund, 2015). However, it has been increasingly recognized that fresh vegetables and fruits other than beef or beef-product can be the sources of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection (Cheol et al., 2013; Gomes et al., 2016; Karmali et al., 2010).

Gastroenteritis due to foodborne disease is one of the most common illnesses in Ethiopia, and it is a leading cause of death among people of all ages in the country (Ayana et al., 2015). Consumption of raw beef is commonly practiced in Ethiopia. Generally, illegal slaughtering of animals in open fields, unhygienic slaughter practices in the abattoirs, and wide-spread tradition of consumption of raw meat (Kitfo dulet and Kurt) are potential risk factors in the country. Given that ruminants are natural reservoirs of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains, higher prevalence is common in areas where fecal contamination is continuous, namely, farms, transportation trucks used to deliver animals to slaughtering houses, and slaughtering halls (Bekele et al., 2014; Beyi et al., 2017; Disassa et al., 2017).

A handful of studies have been conducted in Ethiopia that reports the occurrence level of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin mostly in meat and milk in recent years (Atnafie et al., 2017; Dulo et al., 2015; Mengistu et al., 2017; Mersha et al., 2010; Taye, 2013). Most of the studies were conducted in central Ethiopia due to extensive animal farming practices in those areas. There are also studies throughout the country that estimate the prevalence of the organism in foods of animal origin. National level estimation and quantification of Escherichia coli occurrence can help responsible bodies for the prevention and control of its occurrence in foods before reaching end users ultimately reducing its impact. To the best of our knowledge, this review is the first of its kind in estimating the pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia. The objective of the study was to pool estimates of proportions of occurrence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin to have a national estimate of the occurrence level of the organism.

2. Methodology

2.1. Literature search strategy

The literature search was conducted to identify all published studies reporting the prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin (meat and milk). It was conducted in electronic databases of PubMed, google scholar, African Journals Online, EMBase, and Scopus from November 2017 to May 2018. The specific search medical subject heading (MeSH) terms include “Escherichia coli and Ethiopia”, “Escherichia coli prevalence and Ethiopia”, “Escherichia coli O17: H7 and Ethiopia”, “Escherichia coli and meat in Ethiopia”, “Escherichia coli in milk in Ethiopia”, “Escherichia coli” AND “Ethiopia” AND “prevalence”. Based on the intensive literature search, a total of 187 pieces of literature that report the prevalence of Escherichia coli in Ethiopia were retrieved. However, only 30 reports on the prevalence of Escherichia coli in meat, milk, and related working environmental samples made it to the final meta-analysis procedure. Study screening strategy and exclusion reasons are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flowchart of literature search and inclusion/exclusion process.

2.2. Eligibility criteria and data extraction procedure

All Articles that report the prevalence of Escherichia coli in meat and milk in Ethiopia were downloaded and added to Mendeley reference manager. Duplicates were rigorously checked and removed. Quality criteria were developed before starting the review of full papers. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were defined regarding the relevance of the articles to the research questions of interest. The inclusion criteria include an observational study that reports prevalence of the diseases, published article or MSc thesis in University online repositories, reporting the prevalence of the organism only in foods of animal origin from 2000 to 2017, diagnostic methods that employed one of the diagnostic approaches (culture, Latex agglutination, and molecular methods). Articles that met the above criteria were considered for the final meta-analysis and systematic review. Titles were checked twice in both excluded and included databases of the Mendeley reference manager before the start of the data extraction process to avoid missing a valuable report independently. Those papers considered relevant were retained, and their results were extracted to a pre-prepared data extraction excel sheet. Data extracted from valuable papers include study area, study year, sample size, number of positives, food type examined, diagnosis method used, author's name, article title, and year of publication.

2.3. Statistical analysis method

Statistical analyses were done using Stata 14 (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX). A simple summary of reports with the prevalence of Escherichia coli was done by descriptive statistics. Meta-analysis of prevalence data was analyzed, pooled the estimates and the 95% confidence intervals. Due to the natures of studies, substantial heterogeneity was expected, and a random-effects meta-analysis was done with the estimate of heterogeneity being taken from an inverse-variance model (DerSimonian and Laird, 1986). Publication bias was assessed using the Eggers test, as well as visual inspection of the funnel plot. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin's I2 and Cochran's Q method. I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% were considered low, moderate and high heterogeneity, respectively (Higgins and Thompson, 2002). Subgroup analysis was also conducted by food type sampled, the location of study and diagnosis method used. Meta-regression was used to investigate factors potentially contributing to the between-study heterogeneity. Univariable analysis was done for each selected variable included. Sample size as a continuous variable and categorized variable, study year as a categorized variable, and diagnosis method was used in the final meta-regression model.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive results of eligible studies

From all screened studies, 30 articles were eligible for the final systematic review and meta-analysis. Literature was heterogeneous, had inappropriate study designs, unrepresentative sample size, and unreliable diagnostic methods. This diversity, together with the lack of data on other required variables, reduced our datasets substantially. Descriptive summary statistics were calculated to determine the total number of sampled foods and the range of prevalence estimates in different foods. Accordingly, the overall apparent prevalence in all studies estimated 18.1% in all samples examined. Few studies reported the pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli O 157: H7 either with molecular examination or latex agglutination tests, while most of the studies reported at the species level (Escherichia coli) by culture and biochemical tests. A detailed summary of the studies can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of included studies in the final systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study (references) Year SS NP AP (%) Region Diagnosis method used Strain isolated Sample type
Zuleka et al. (2016) 2016 288 30 21.74 Southern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Wubet et al. (2014) 2014 84 26 30.95 Western Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Taye (2013) 2013 113 35 30.97 Eastern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Tassew et al. (2010) 2010 165 44 26.67 Western Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Reta et al. (2016) 2016 120 70 58.33 Southern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Mohammed et al. (2014) 2014 384 61 15.89 Eastern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Messele et al. (2017) 2017 73 4 5.48 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Messele et al. (2017) 2017 73 27 36.99 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Chicken
Messele et al. (2017) 2017 73 17 23.29 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Mutton
Messele et al. (2017) 2017 73 15 20.55 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Chevon
Mersha et al. (2010) 2010 120 8 6.67 Central Ethiopia Molecular diagnosis (PCR) Escherichia coli O157:H7 Chevon
Mersha et al. (2010) 2010 224 21 9.38 Central Ethiopia Molecular diagnosis (PCR) Escherichia coli O157:H7 Mutton
Mersha et al. (2010) 2010 344 13 3.78 Central Ethiopia Molecular diagnosis (PCR) Escherichia coli O157:H7 Environmental samples
Mengistu et al. (2017) 2017 30 7 23.33 Eastern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Environmental samples
Mengistu et al. (2017) 2017 290 36 12.41 Eastern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Melkamsew et al. (2012) 2012 450 51 11.33 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Hilali et al. (2016) 2016 19 7 36.84 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Hiko et al. (2015) 2015 119 35 29.41 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Hiko et al. (2008) 2008 243 6 2.47 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Mutton
Hiko et al. (2008) 2008 245 5 2.04 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Chevon
Hiko et al. (2008) 2008 250 20 8.00 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Haileselassie et al. (2013) 2013 33 9 27.27 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Beef
Haile et al. (2017) 2017 150 14 9.33 Western Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Haile et al. (2017) 2017 150 11 7.33 Western Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Environmental samples
Hadush et al. (2008) 2014 69 15 21.74 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Garedew et al. (2012) 2012 54 16 29.63 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Dulo et al. (2015) 2014 235 6 2.55 Eastern Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Chevon
Disassa et al. (2017) 2017 380 129 33.95 Western Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Desta et al. (2016) 2016 106 49 46.23 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Desta et al. (2011) 2011 106 21 19.81 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Demme and Shimeles (2015) 2015 102 19 18.63 Central Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Beyi et al. (2017) 2017 195 5 2.56 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Beyi et al. (2017) 2017 330 4 1.21 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Environmental samples
Bekele et al. (2014) 2014 384 39 10.16 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Balcha et al. (2014) 2014 80 50 62.50 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test Escherichia coli Beef
Atnafie et al. (2017) 2017 300 8 2.67 Southern Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Atnafie et al. (2017) 2017 330 7 2.12 Southern Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Environmental samples
Amenu et al. (2014) 2014 53 11 20.75 Southern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Adugna et al. (2013) 2013 74 7 9.46 Southern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Abebe et al. (2014) 2014 192 43 22.40 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test - Milk
Abebe et al. (2014) 2014 192 41 21.35 Northern Ethiopia Culture and biochemical test Escherichia coli Beef
Abdissa et al. (2017) 2017 1235 6 0.49 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef
Abdissa et al. (2017) 2017 1247 10 0.80 Central Ethiopia Latex agglutination test Escherichia coli O157:H7 Environmental samples
Open in a new tab

SS sample size, NP number of positives, AP apparent prevalence.

3.2. Meta-analysis

Due to the expected variation between studies, random-effects meta-analyses were carried out using the total sample size and number of positives (effect size and standard error of the effect size). The meta-analysis indicated that between-study variability was high (τ2 = 0.001; heterogeneity I2 = 96.77% with Heterogeneity chi-square = 1298.92, degree of freedom = 42 and a P value of 0.001). Individual study prevalence estimates ranged from 0% to 62% with the overall random pooled prevalence of 15% (95% CI = 13%–17%). Studies weighted approximately equal with weights on individual studies ranging from 1.07% to 3.08% due to high heterogeneity between studies. Fig. 2 presents the Forest Plot derived from the meta-analysis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plot on Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin prevalence estimates in Ethiopia.

3.3. Subgroup meta-analysis

Subgroup analyses were done for sample types (Table 2) (beef, milk, mutton, chevon, chicken and environmental swabs), study locations (Table 3) (eastern, central, northern, southern and western Ethiopia), and diagnosis methods used (Table 4) (culture and biochemical method, latex agglutination and molecular techniques). Results of the subgroup analysis are depicted in Figs. 3, 4, and 5 respectively. We also performed a subgroup analysis for the prevalence of pathogenic of Escherichia coli O157: H7. The meta-analysis indicated that between-study variability was high (τ2 = 0.01; I2 = 89.06% with Cochran's Q statistics = 146.28, at a degree of freedom = 16 with a P value of = 0.01). Individual study prevalence estimates ranged from 0% to 10% with the overall random pooled prevalence of 4% (95% CI = 3%–5%). Fig. 6 presents the Forest plot derived from the meta-analysis of the pathogenic strain.

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis for comparison of prevalence of Escherichia coli in different sample types examined.

Sample type Prevalence (95%CI) I2 Q Heterogeneity test
DF P
Beef 6 (12–20) 97.2% 506.05 14 0.00
Chevon 5 (2–9) 83.0% 17.67 3 0.00
Chicken 37 (26–49) - - 0 -
Environmental sample 3 (1–4) 81.22% 26.63 5 0.00
Milk 26 (0.19–0.33) 93.97% 215.63 13 0.00
Mutton 10 (2–19) - - 2 -
Overall 15 (13–17) 96.7% 1298.92 42 0.00
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis for comparison of prevalence of Escherichia coli in different geographical locations across Ethiopia.

Region Prevalence% (95%CI) I2 Q Heterogeneity test
DF P
Eastern Ethiopia 16 (7–25) 95.1% 82.89 4 0.00
Southern Ethiopia 16 (8–24) 97.1% 177.34 5 0.00
Central Ethiopia 9 (7–11) 95.2% 399.14 19 0.00
Western Ethiopia 21 (10–33) 95.77% 94.45 4 0.00
Northern Ethiopia 0.31 (2–42) 88.26% 51.10 6 0.00
Overall 0.15 (13–17) 96.7% 1298.92 42 0.00
Open in a new tab

Table 4.

Subgroup analysis for comparison of prevalence of Escherichia coli in by diagnosis method used.

Diagnosis method Prevalence (95%CI) I2 Q Heterogeneity test
DF P
Culture and biochemical tests 26 (0.21–0.30) 92.6% 352.16 26 0.00
Latex agglutination 3 (0.02–0.04) 87.15% 93.35 12 0.00
Molecular diagnosis 6 (3–10) . . 2 .
Overall 15 (13–17) 96.7% 1298.92 42 0.00
Open in a new tab

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of sub group analysis by diagnosis method used on Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin prevalence estimates in Ethiopia.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of sub group analysis by study location on Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin prevalence estimates in Ethiopia.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of sub group analysis by sample type examined on Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin prevalence estimates in Ethiopia.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Forest plot on Escherichia coli O157 in foods of animal origin prevalence estimates in Ethiopia.

3.4. Meta-regression

Meta-regression analysis was done for each variable included in the study separately. The variables included were sample size as a continuous and categorized variable, study location, sample types examined, study year as a categorical variable, and diagnosis method used. Continuous variable (sample size) was subjected to assessment to see a linear relationship between the independent effect size. Those variables with a p-values <0.1 were used in the multivariable meta-regression analysis. Categorized sample size, study year as a categorical variable, and diagnosis method used had significant value and retained in the final multivariable analysis. Results of final multivariable meta-regression are summarized in Table 5 and in Figs. 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Table 5.

Final multivariable meta regression model.

Variables Coefficient P-value 95% CI
Diagnosis method used
 Culture and biochemical tests Reference
 Latex agglutination −0.146 0.002 −0.23 to −0.06
 Molecular diagnosis −0.137 0.064 −0.28 to 0.008
Sample size category
 Sample size less than 150 Reference
 Sample size between 151 and 300 −0.087 0.044 −0.17 to −0.002
 Sample size greater than 300 −0.084 0.075 −0.17 to 0.009
Study year category
 Study year 2008–2013 Reference
 Study year 2014–2016 0.05 0.278 −0.043 to 0.15
 Study year 2017 −0.016 0.737 −0.11 to 0.08
Constant 0.26 0.000 0.18–0.34
Open in a new tab

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Meta-regression plot of study year versus prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

Meta-regression plot of diagnosis method used versus prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

Meta-regression plot of study location versus prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Open in a new tab

Meta-regression plot of sample size versus prevalence of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia.

3.5. Publication bias and small study effect assessment

Even though assessing publication bias may not be applicable in situations like this because Begg's and Egger's test become unsuitable due to an association between the effect size and its standard error, we assessed bias and small study effects by funnel plot observation and Begg's and Egger's test for small-study effects. The result of effect estimates against its standard error showed that there was a publication bias with a p-value of 0.001. (see Table 6 and Fig. 11 for Egger's test for small-study effects and funnel plot assessment respectively).

Table 6.

Eggers test for publication bias assessment.

Standard effect Coefficient t-value p-value 95%CI
Slope −0.01 −2.18 0.035 −0.02 to −0.00072
Bias 5.89 11.32 0.001 4.84–6.94
Open in a new tab

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Open in a new tab

Funnel plot that assesses publication bias.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analyses on the status of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin in Ethiopia. The review process was limited to foods of animal origin to minimize heterogeneity between studies and absence of enough studies in other foodstuffs. This report was from the analysis of data obtained through a systematic review of scientific publications on the organism between 2008 to 2017. Literature was very heterogeneous, had inappropriate study designs, unrepresentative sample size, and different diagnostic methods. Lack of data on the required variables and other factors reduced the number of studies to be included in the final meta-analysis substantially. The final systematic review and meta-analyses were done in 30 studies.

According to this review, the first published result that reported Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin was in 2008 (Hiko et al., 2008). However, from that year onwards an incredible effort has been noted to report the organism's occurrence in different foods. Studies increased these days regarding number and quality by applying the latest diagnostic techniques like latex agglutination and molecular (PCR) methods. The other qualities of studies were sampling not only the food but also working environment like swabs of workers hand, knife and handling equipment. Theses sampling approaches are appreciated because they are helpful in identifying sources of contamination.

The overall pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli was 15% in all samples across Ethiopia means a relatively higher level of occurrence (Ajayi et al., 2011). This organism is responsible for severe infection in Ethiopia (Ayana et al., 2015). Based on the result of this systematic review and meta-analysis, one can argue that the source of the diseases can be contaminated foods from an animal origin. Traditionally in Ethiopia, it is costmary to consume raw meat like birndo, dulet and kitfo (Avery, 2004). High prevalence level of the organism in these foodstuffs, and raw meat consumption habit can be factors responsible for infections occurred in the country. That is why we suggest raw milk and meat consumption habit of Ethiopians should be prohibited or handled with caution. The overall prevalence of the organism in meat was 16% meaning raw meat consumption may result in contracting Escherichia coli infections. In milk, the overall pooled prevalence result was 26%. This high level of occurrence can be attributed to contamination of milk with cattle feces during milking because cattle are the reservoirs of the organism. In addition to feces, poor personal hygiene, contaminated equipment can also be suspected as a source of contamination. However, the occurrence level of Escherichia coli in environmental samples was not significant in this systematic review and meta-analysis. This result can be an indication of the need for further studies involving other environmental samples to predict where we should act to reduce its level of occurrence.

Most of the eligible studies retrieved were conducted in central Ethiopia. This can be due to most of milk and meat processing plants are found in this area which can attract the attention of researchers and funders in investigating the occurrence of the organism. Even though this approach may not be wrong at all, it is wise to involve a broader area of research as the condition can be worth in rural households where poor hygienic practice and raw food consumption is imminent. According to studies included, the overall pooled prevalence of the organism was lower in central Ethiopia (9% with a 95% confidence interval of 7%–11%). This can be due to most studies conducted in this area might apply advanced diagnostic techniques that avoid false positives and also a relatively higher level of hygienic practice may be in place. Central Ethiopia includes the capital Addis Ababa which is relatively civilized in applying hygienic measures in food processing plants, and farms than other parts of the country.

Based on diagnostic techniques used, the prevalence of the organism was lower in molecular diagnostic technique followed by a latex agglutination test (Table 1). However, it was higher in biochemical staining techniques. This can be attributed to biochemical test may only estimate at species level while advanced diagnosis techniques can identify the pathogenic strain. These methods should be further confirmed by more advanced methods of examination to estimate STEC.

One of the reasons for the higher level of occurrence of the organism in foods of animal origin can be poor diagnosis method used. Most of the studies included in this review did not identify pathogenic strains like Escherichia coli O157: H7. This can be attributed to poor infrastructure in most research institutes and Universities to implement advanced techniques. However recently, the application of a latex agglutination test has increased according to studies included in this review. Based on the molecular and serological test, the overall pooled prevalence of pathogenic E. coli (Escherichia coli O157) was found 4% in all samples. This level of prevalence might be low. However, the organism is responsible for severe infections that occurred in the country (Disassa et al., 2017; Mersha et al., 2010). For that matter, a comprehensive investigation of the organism with advanced detection methods should be in place.

As indicated in the result section, the between-study variability was high. This variation can be due to different studies involving a different method of diagnosis, different sample size, different study locations and many more reasons. The result of meta-regression indicated that effect size estimates were significantly predicted by a diagnostic method used, sample size and study year reported. This is an indication of expecting higher variation between studies.

5. Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the level of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin is high. This is a clear message that planning of mitigation strategies to reduce the impact of this organism is mandatory. This should be done sooner than later not only to protect exposed group but also to compete in the international market of animal products. If the country wants to achieve the long-awaited membership to world trade organization, it needs to reduce the occurrence of this and other foodborne organisms to an acceptable level. The pathogenic strain Escherichia coli O157: H7 was reported only in a few studies. This is because of diagnostic techniques used that are not capable of identifying at the strain level. This and other known pathogenic strains should be well studied by applying modern methods of diagnosis to identify as well as to estimate the actual status in foods of animal origin precisely. Besides, future studies should bear in mind to include rural households of the country where the level of hygienic practices is expected to be low.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Ayalew Assefa: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Amare Bihon: Performed the experiments; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

References

  1. Abdissa R., Haile W., Fite A.T., Beyi A.F., Agga G.E., Edao B.M., Tadesse F., Korsa M.G., Beyene T.J., De Zutter L., Cox E., Goddeeris B.M. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in beef cattle at slaughter and beef carcasses at retail shops in Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017;17:277. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2372-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abebe M., Hailelule A., Abrha B., Nigus A., Birhanu M., Adane H., Genene T., Daniel H., Getachew G., Merga G., Haftay A. Antibiogram of Escherichia coli strains isolated from food of bovine origin in selected Woredas of Tigray, Ethiopia. J. Bacteriol. Res. 2014;6:17–22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adugna M., Seifu E., Kebeded A., Doluschitz R. Quality and safety of camel milk along the value chain in eastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Stud. 2013;2:150–157. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajayi O., Williams L.L., Oluwoye J., Johnson J.U., Okafor F., Sanders O.G., Wilson T. Epidemiological approaches to food safety. Food Protect. Trends. 2011;31:560–568. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amenu K., Spengler M., Markemann A., Zárate A.V. Microbial quality of water in rural households of Ethiopia: implications for milk safety and public health. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2014;32:190–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Atnafie B., Paulos D., Abera M., Tefera G., Hailu D., Kasaye S., Amenu K. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle feces and contamination of carcass and various contact surfaces in abattoir and butcher shops of Hawassa, Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0938-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Avery A. 2004. Red Meat and Poultry Production and Consumption in Ethiopia and Distribution in Addis Ababa. Addis Ababa. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayana Z., Yohannis M., Abera Z. Food-borne bacterial diseases in Ethiopia. Acad. J. Nutr. 2015;4:62–76. [Google Scholar]
  9. Balcha E., Kumar A., Tassew H. Evaluation of safety of beef sold in and around Mekelle with special reference to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Global Vet. 2014;12:569–572. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bekele T., Zewde G., Tefera G., Feleke A., Zerom K. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw meat in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: prevalence at an abattoir and retailers and antimicrobial susceptibility. Int. J. Food Contam. 2014;1:4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bevilacqua A., Corbo M.R., Sinigaglia M. Woodhead Publishing; Amsterdam: 2017. The Microbiological Quality of Food. [Google Scholar]
  12. Beyi A.F., Fite A.T., Tora E., Tafese A., Genu T., Kaba T., Beyene T.J., Beyene T., Korsa M.G., Tadesse F., De Zutter L., Goddeeris B.M., Cox E. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157 in beef at butcher shops and restaurants in central Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:49. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0964-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheol K., Hiki O., Young M., Park D., Kaspar C.W. Prevalent and persistent Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains on farms are selected by bovine passage. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;162:912–920. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cobbaut K., Houf K., Buvens G., Habib I., De Zutter L. Occurrence of non-sorbitol fermenting, verocytotoxin-lacking Escherichia coli O157 on cattle farms. Vet. Microbiol. J. 2009;138:174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Demme B., Shimeles A. Isolation and identification of major bacterial pathogen from clinical mastitis cow raw milk in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Acad. J. Anim. Dis. 2015;4:44–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Desta H., Cattaneo D., Martino P.A., Antoniazzi V., Soncini G., Orto V.D., Savoini G. 2011. Occurrence of Pathogenic Species of Escherichia coli, Listeria Monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Brucella in Bovine Raw Bulk Milk in the Selected Milk Sheds Asella Dairy Union and Ada Dairy Cooperatives, Ethiopia 3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Desta H., Donata C., Gabriella S., Martino P. Bacteriological quality of milk in raw bovine bulk milk in the selected milk collection centers: smallholder dairy processing Ethiopia. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 2016;4:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Disassa N., Sibhat B., Mengistu S., Muktar Y., Belina D. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of E. coli O157:H7 isolated from traditionally marketed raw cow milk in and around Asosa town, western Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Int. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/7581531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dulo F., Feleke A., Szonyi B., Fries R., Baumann M., Grace D. Isolation of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli O157 from goats in the Somali region of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional, abattoir-based study. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Earley B., Leonard N. The characterisation of E. coli O157:H7 isolates from cattle faeces and feedlot environment using PFGE. Vet. Microbiol. J. 2006;114:331–336. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garedew L., Berhanu A., Mengesha D., Tsegay G. Identification of gram-negative bacteria from critical control points of raw and pasteurized cow milk consumed at Gondar town and its suburbs, Ethiopia. BMC Publ. Health. 2012;12:950. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gomes T.A.T., Elias W.P., Scaletsky I.C.A., Guth B.E.C., Rodrigues J.F., Piazza R.M.F., Ferreira L.C.S., Martinez M.B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016;47:3–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hadush B., Kebede E., Kidanu H. Assessment of bacteriological quality of raw camels' milk in Ab-'Ala, north eastern Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2008;20:151. [Google Scholar]
  25. Haile A.F., Kebede D., Wubshet A.K. Prevalence and antibiogram of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from bovine in Jimma, Ethiopia: abattoir- based survey. Ethiop. Vet. J. 2017;21:109–120. [Google Scholar]
  26. Haileselassie M., Taddele H., Adhana K., Kalayou S. Food safety knowledge and practices of abattoir and butchery shops and the microbial profile of meat in Mekelle City, Ethiopia. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013;3:407–412. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60085-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiko A., Ameni G., Langkabel N., Fries R. Microbiological load and zoonotic agents in beef mortadella from Addis Ababa city supermarkets. J. Food Protect. 2015;78:1043–1045. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hiko A., Asrat D., Zewde G. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in retail raw meat products in Ethiopia. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2008;2:389–393. doi: 10.3855/jidc.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hilali M.E., Szonyi B., Wondim B., Birhanie M., Haile A., Rischkowsky B.A. 2016. Quality of Milk and Dairy Products under Traditional Smallholder System in Northern Ethiopia Milk Composition Microbial Quality 5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hussein H.S., Lake S.L., Ringkob T.P. Cattle as a reservoir of shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli including O157:H7—pre- and post-harvest control measures to assure beef safety. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2001;17:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karmali M.A., Gannon V., Sargeant J.M. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) Vet. Microbiol. 2010;140:360–370. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lopez-Campos G., Martinez-Suarez J.V., Aguado-Urda M., Alonso V.L. Microarray Detection and Characterization of Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens, Springer Briefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition. 2012. Detection, identification, and analysis of foodborne pathogens; pp. 13–33. [Google Scholar]
  34. Melkamsew A.T., Pal M., Beda A.H. Bacteriological study on coliform organisms from Ethiopian traditional cheese west Showa zone, Ethiopia. Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012;3:188–191. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mengistu S., Abayneh E., Shiferaw D. E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella species: public health importance and microbial safety in beef at selected slaughter houses and retail shops in eastern Ethiopia. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2017;8 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mersha G., Asrat D., Zewde B.M., Kyule M. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in faeces, skin and carcasses from sheep and goats in Ethiopia. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;50:71–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Messele Y.E., Abdi R.D., Yalew S.T., Tegegne D.T., Emeru B.A., Werid G.M. Molecular determination of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from raw meat in Addis Ababa and Bishoftu, Ethiopia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2017;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0233-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mohammed O., Shimelis D., Admasu P., Feyera T. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of E. coli isolates from raw meat samples obtained from abattoirs in Dire Dawa city, eastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 2014;5:35–39. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pennington H. Escherichia coli O157. Lancet. 2010;376:1428–1435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60963-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reta M.A., Bereda T.W., Alemu A.N. Bacterial contaminations of raw cow's milk consumed at Jigjiga City of Somali Regional State, eastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Contam. 2016;3:4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Söderlund R. 2015. Molecular Epidemiology of Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tassew H., Abdissa A., Beyene G., Gebre-Selassie S. Microbial flora and food borne pathogens on minced meat and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 2010;20:137–143. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v20i3.69442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Taye M. Study on carcass contaminating Escherichia coli in apparently healthy slaughtered cattle in Haramaya University slaughter house with special emphasis on Escherichia coli O157:H7, Ethiopia. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2013;04:4–6. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wubet A., Dabassa A., Demissie S. Bacteriological quality and detection of bovine mastitis pathogens of milk sold in Jimma town. Bacteriol. J. 2014;4:12–20. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zuleka I.M., Abebe M.S., Awot T.M., Belayneh G.A., Tehentna A.T., Kumar N. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from camel milk in Somali region. Indian J. Anim. Health. 2016;55:119–128. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES