Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Mov Disord. 2012 Nov 8;27(13):1694–1697. doi: 10.1002/mds.25195

Association of Tef Polymorphism With Depression in Parkinson Disease

Ping Hua 1, Weiguo Liu 1,*, Sheng-Han Kuo 2, Yanyan Zhao 1, Ling Chen 3, Ning Zhang 3, Chun Wang 3, Suwan Guo 3, Li Wang 4, Hong Xiao 5, Justin Y Kwan 6, Tianxia Wu 7
PMCID: PMC6089252  NIHMSID: NIHMS983696  PMID: 23138696

Abstract

Background

Circadian rhythm disturbance has been implicated in depression, and polymorphisms of circadian genes Cry1, Cry2, and Tef are associated with depression. However, the relationship between these genes and depression symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) has not been established.

Methods

Four hundred eight subjects with PD participated in this study. Demographics, UPDRS, Mini–Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) were obtained in all subjects. Frequency of polymorphisms of Cry1 rs2287161, Cry2 rs10838524, and Tef rs738499 was determined, and the association between genetic polymorphisms of circadian genes and HAMD scores in patients with PD was examined.

Results

Tef, but not Cry1 or Cry2, is associated with HAMD scores in patients with PD in a linear regression model after adjusting for clinical variables (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

The polymorphism of Tef rs738499 is associated with depression symptoms in PD.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, depression, Tef, circadian genes


Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by Lewy body inclusions and dopaminergic neuronal death in the substantia nigra. The cardinal clinical symptoms of PD are rest tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, which are usually levodopa responsive.1 Several nonmotor symptoms can also occur in PD, such as dementia, depression, rapid eye movement behavior disorder, and constipation, and these symptoms can cause significant disability and adversely affect quality of life in PD patients.2

Among the nonmotor symptoms in PD, depression is the most common neuropsychiatric comorbid condition. 3 The prevalence of depression in PD (dPD) varies from 2.7% to 90% in different studies, with a mean prevalence of approximately 40%.3,4 Several risk factors have been identified that increase the risk for dPD. Patients with early-onset PD and PD patients who carry LRRK2 mutations are more likely to be depressed.5,6 Polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene promoter (5-HTTLPR) were also found to be associated with dPD,79 but this result was not consistently present in a subsequent study that included a larger cohort of PD patients.10

Genetic polymorphisms in the circadian genes, Cry1, Cry2, Npas2, Sirt1, and Tef, have been reported to be associated with major depression.1114 However, little is known about the underlying biological mechanism of this association. The circadian rhythm is tightly regulated by the circadian gene networks consisting of a series of auto-regulatory transcription-translation loops with positive and negative feedbacks to the central circadian genes and their proteins.15 The positive feedback loop is comprised of Clock/Npas2 and Bmal1 genes and their proteins (CLOCK and BMAL1). CLOCK and BMAL1 form heterodimers to bind to the promoter of Cry1, Cry2, Per1, and Per2 to activate their transcription. The protein products of these genes, CRY and PER, gradually accumulate during a 24-hour period. In the negative feedback loop, CRY and PER form heterodimers that translocate to the nucleus and inhibit their own synthesis by interacting with CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers. The entire cycle requires approximately 24 hours to complete, and these feedback loops are postulated to be the cellular mechanism of circadian rhythm.15 Many other genes also modulate the circadian loops. Thyrotroph embryonic factor (TEF), a transcription factor, is of particular interest because light exposure can alter circadian rhythm by inducing Tef expression and, subsequently, increasing PER levels.16 It is possible that genetic polymorphisms in these circadian genes lead to a disturbance in the circadian rhythm, resulting in neurotransmission dysfunction and a higher risk of depression.

In patients with depression, the circadian rhythms are disrupted, and this abnormality manifests clinically as alterations in core temperature, sleep length, and rhythmic hormone secretion.17,18 Therapies to modulate circadian rhythms have been found to be effective in treating depression. Light therapy has been used to treat seasonal depression, and sleep deprivation has been used as an adjunct therapy in treating major depression.19,20 Fluoxetine and lithium are suggested to exert their antidepressant effects by regulating circadian mechanisms.21,22

It is uncertain whether circadian gene polymorphisms are associated with dPD. We conducted a study to analyze single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of clock genes (Cry1 rs2287161, Cry2 rs10838524, and Tef rs738499) in PD patients in the Han Chinese population. These SNPs were chosen based on previous studies that showed an association between these SNPs and depression and sleep disorders.11,13,23

Patients and Methods

Study Population

Four hundred eight unrelated PD patients were recruited from the PD Clinic at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China) between September 2007 and October 2010. All patients were diagnosed with PD, using the Queen Square Brain Bank Criteria,24 by two neurologists specialized in movement disorders (W.L. and Y.Z.). Depression severity in all PD patients was evaluated using the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD).25 Clinical assessment of PD patients also included demographic variables, disease duration, Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE),26 H & Y staging,27 UPDRS Part III (UPDRS-III) 28 and daily L-dopa equivalent dose (LED): 100 mg standard L-dopa = 140 mg controlled-release L-dopa = 50 mg ropinirole = 1 mg pramipexole = 10 mg selegiline.29 All clinical evaluations were performed during the “on” period in PD patients. Patients who had other neurodegenerative disorders, severe medical illnesses, and a history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorders, as well as dementia determined by MMSE adjusted by age and education levels, were excluded from participation in this study.30 All subjects gave written informed consent for the study, which was approved by the ethics committee of Nanjing Medical University.

Genetic Association Study

Genotyping was performed using methods previously described,23,31 and the genotypes of Cry1 rs2287161, Cry2 rs10838524, and Tef rs738499 were screened by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) (Supporting Table 1). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and the SHEsis program.32 HAMD scores were compared between different genotypes of each SNP using Kruskal-Wallis’s H test for global comparison and Mann-Whitney’s U test for pairwise comparison. The correlation between clinical variables and HAMD scores was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. A linear regression was generated to determine the extent to which the genetic polymorphisms in Cry1, Cry2, and Tef were associated with HAMD scores after adjusting for gender, disease duration, UPDRS-III, H & Y, and MMSE. The statistical significance threshold was set at P < 0.05 corrected.

Results

Mean age of the PD patients was 65.3 ± 10.2, and 61.5% were men. Mean UPDRS-III was 25.7 ± 15.1, mean H & Y was 2.0 ± 0.8, mean LED was 341.0 ± 283.7, mean MMSE score was 27.7 ± 3.3, and mean HAMD score was 14.4 ± 10.4. None of the clinical variables were normally distributed, except for age.

Distribution of the genotypes from all PD patients fitted the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Higher HAMD scores were found in the TT genotype group in Tef rs738499 (P < 0.01) and the CC genotype group in Cry1 rs2287161 (P < 0.01). There was no difference in HAMD score between the AA genotype and AG genotype group in Cry2 rs10838524 (Table 1). Spearman’s rank correlation showed that a higher HAMD score was associated with female gender (P < 0.01), longer disease duration (P < 0.05), higher UPDRS-III score (P < 0.01), higher H & Y (P < 0.01), lower MMSE scores (P < 0.01), the CC genotype in Cry1 rs2287161 (P < 0.01), and the TT genotype in Tef rs738499 (P < 0.01). There was no correlation between HAMD score and age, LED, or Cry2 rs10838524.

Table 1.

Comparison of HAMD scores among different genotypes

Gene Genotype (Number) HAMD Scores P Value

Global Test* Pairwise Comparison**
Tef TT (283) 15.7 ± 11.1 0.003 reference
TG (116) 11.6 ± 8.1 0.001 reference
GG (9) 10.1 ± 8.0 0.127 0.563
Cry1 CC (289) 15.2 ± 10.7 <0.001 reference
CG (106) 13.3 ± 9.5 0.140 reference
GG (13) 5.2 ± 4.7 <0.001 0.001
Cry2 AA (330) 14.9 ± 10.7 0.078
AG (78) 12.0 ± 8.6
*

Kruskal-Wallis’s H test for global comparison of HAMD scores of different genotypes.

**

Mann Whitney’s U test for comparison of HAMD scores between two genotypes.

Stepwise linear regression adjusting for gender, disease duration, UPDRS-III, H & Y, and MMSE showed that UPDRS-III, gender, and the polymorphism in Tef rs738499 contributed to 20.7% of the variance, and Tef rs738499 accounted for 1.8% of the variance in HAMD scores (P = 0.004) (Table 2). Cry1 and Cry 2 polymorphisms did not contributed to the variance in HAMD scores.

Table 2.

Contribution of genotypes to HAMD scores adjusted by gender, duration, UPDRS-III, H & Y, and MMSE

Predictor Beta r r2 Adjusted r2 r2 Change t P Value
UPDRS-III 0.387 0.394 0.155 0.153 0.155 8.371 0.000
Gender 0.173 0.434 0.189 0.184 0.033 3.755 0.000
Tef −0.136 0.455 0.207 0.201 0.018 32.932 0.004

Abbreviations: Beta, standardized regression coefficients; r, multiple correlation coefficients; r2, determination coefficient; t, t test statistics for Beta.

Discussion and Conclusions

This study showed an association between Tef rs738499 and HAMD scores in PD patients, suggesting that the Tef rs738499 polymorphism may confer an increased risk for depression in this patient group. Polymorphisms in Cry1 rs2287161 and Cry2 rs10838524 were not associated with depression symptoms in our PD patients.

The protein product of the gene, Tef, belongs to the PAR bZip (proline and acidic amino-acid–rich basic leucine zipper) transcription factor family, which are important regulators of circadian rhythm.33 Tef expression is induced by light exposure and can modulate Per2 expression.16 Interestingly, PAR bZip-deficient mice have been shown to have abnormal neurotransmitter metabolism, including a decreased brain level of 5-HT and dopamine.34 Polymorphism in Tef rs738499 may be a susceptibility factor for altered circadian rhythm and dysfunctional neurotransmission and may increase the risk for depression in PD patients.

It is uncertain whether Tef rs738499 is associated with major depressive disorders or is specific to PD patients with depressive symptoms. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings. Longitudinal studies that include clinical measures of depression symptoms and severity of PD motor symptoms are warranted to further understand the complex relationships between these genetic variants and the neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD patients. In addition, the molecular mechanisms by which Tef rs738499 alters the risk for dPD remain obscure, and the effect of the polymorphism on the protein function or gene expression level is unknown. But, a previous study13 reported that rs738499 had the highest linkage with rs599609, and that an SNP highly correlates with Tef expression.35 Further studies to determine the effects of the genetic polymorphisms may facilitate a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie psychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disorders such as PD. The association between other circadian genes, such as Sirt1 and Npas2, and dPD is largely unknown and requires further examination.12 We determined the SNPs in Npas2 rs11123857 in 200 Chinese subjects, and no GG or AG genotypes were found, suggesting that the G allele in Npas2 rs11123857 is rare in the Han Chinese population.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgments

Funding agencies: The study was supported by the National Natural Science (81170309), Medical Science and Technology Foundation Project of Chinese Traditional Medicine from Jiangsu Province (LB09088), and Key Project of Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation from the Nanjing Department of Health (200905016), an American Academy of Neurology Research Fellowship, and the Parkinson Disease Foundation.

The authors thank all the PD patients who participated in this study.

Footnotes

Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.

Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Schapira AH, Tolosa E. Molecular and clinical prodrome of Parkinson disease: implications for treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:309–317. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Savica R, Rocca WA, Ahlskog JE. When does Parkinson disease start? Arch Neurol. 2010;67:798–801. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schrag A. Quality of life and depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2006;248:151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reijnders JS, Ehrt U, Weber WE, Aarsland D, Leentjens AF. A systematic review of prevalence studies of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23:183–189. doi: 10.1002/mds.21803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schrag A, Hovris A, Morley D, Quinn N, Jahanshahi M. Youngversus older-onset Parkinson’s disease: impact of disease and psychosocial consequences. Mov Disord. 2003;18:1250–1256. doi: 10.1002/mds.10527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marras C, Schüle B, Munhoz RP, et al. Phenotype in parkinsonian and nonparkinsonian LRRK2 G2019S mutation carriers. Neurology. 2011;77:325–333. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318227042d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Menza MA, Palermo B, DiPaola R, Sage JI, Ricketts MH. Depression and anxiety in Parkinson’s disease: possible effect of genetic variation in the serotonin transporter. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999;12:49–52. doi: 10.1177/089198879901200202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mossner R, Henneberg A, Schmitt A, et al. Allelic variation of serotonin transporter expression is associated with depression in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2001;6:350–352. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burn DJ, Tiangyou W, Allcock LM, Davison J, Chinnery PF. Allelic variation of a functional polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene and depression in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2006;12:139–141. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang JL, Yang JF, Chan P. No association between polymorphism of serotonin transporter gene and depression in Parkinson’s disease in Chinese. Neurosci Lett. 2009;455:155–158. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Soria V, Martínez-Amorós E, Escaramís G, et al. Differential association of circadian genes with mood disorders: CRY1 and NPAS2 are associated with unipolar major depression and CLOCK and VIP with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1279–1289. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kishi T, Yoshimura R, Kitajima T, et al. SIRT1 gene is associated with major depressive disorder in the Japanese population. J Affect Disord. 2010;126:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kripke DF, Nievergelt CM, Joo E, Shekhtman T, Kelsoe JR. Circadian polymorphisms associated with affective disorders. J Circadian Rhythms. 2009;7:2–11. doi: 10.1186/1740-3391-7-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lavebratt C, Sjöholm LK, Soronen P, et al. CRY2 is associated with depression. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takahashi JS, Hong HK, Ko CH, McDearmon EL. The genetics of mammalian circadian order and disorder: implications for physiology and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:764–775. doi: 10.1038/nrg2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weger BD, Sahinbas M, Otto GW, et al. The light responsive transcriptome of the zebrafish: function and regulation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bruguerolle B, Simon N. Biologic rhythms and Parkinson’s disease: a chronopharmacologic approach to considering fluctuations in function. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2002;25:194–201. doi: 10.1097/00002826-200207000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bunney JN, Potkin SG. Circadian abnormalities, molecular clock genes, and chronobiological treatments in depression. Br Med Bull. 2008;86:23–32. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dallaspezia S, Benedetti F. Chronobiological therapy for mood disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:961–970. doi: 10.1586/ern.11.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fritzsche M, Heller R, Hill H, Kick H. Sleep deprivation as a predictor of response to light therapy in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2001;62:207–215. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sprouse J, Braselton J, Reynolds L. Fluoxetine modulates the circadian biological clock via phase advances of suprachiasmatic nucleus neuronal firing. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:896–899. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abe M, Herzog ED, Block GD. Lithium lengthens the circadian period of individual suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3261–3264. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009280-00042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hua P, Liu W, Zhao Y, Ding H, Wang L, Xiao H. Tef polymorphism is associated with sleep disturbances in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Sleep Med. 2012;13:297–300. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–184. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6:278–296. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427–442. doi: 10.1212/wnl.17.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fahn S, Elton RL. UPDRS program members. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne D, Goldstein M, editors. Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease. Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Healthcare Information; 1987. pp. 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Minguez-Castellanos A, Escamilla-Sevilla F, Katati MJ, et al. Different patterns of medication change after subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: target related effect or selection bias? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:34–39. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.032623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993;269:2386–2391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ke X, Collins A, Ye S. PIRA PCR designer for restriction analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:838–839. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shi YY, He L. SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res. 2005;15:97–98. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gachon F, Fonjallaz P, Damiola F, et al. The loss of circadian PAR bZip transcription factors results in epilepsy. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1397–1412. doi: 10.1101/gad.301404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gavriouchkina D, Fischer S, Ivacevic T, Stolte J, Benes V, Dekens MP. Thyrotroph embryonic factor regulates light-induced transcription of repair genes in zebrafish embryonic cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science. 2007;315:848–853. doi: 10.1126/science.1136678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES