Abstract
Background
The isolation of Extended spectrum βlactamase (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae among food handlers and their implication as sources of food borne outbreaks are a public health concern. This study seeks to investigate the prevalence of faecal carriage of these bacteria among food handlers in the West Coast Region of The Gambia.
Method
This study enrolled 600 participants from 60 Lower Basic Schools in West Coast Region of the country. Stool samples collected from the participants were presumptively screened for the ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae, using Drigalski agar, supplemented with 2mg/L cefotaxime. The bacterial colonies that grew on each Drigalski agar were tested for ESBL production by the double disk synergy test as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI-2015). The confirmatory analysis for ESBL was determined as the zone of inhibition of cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime to ≥5mm from that of cefotaxime /clavulanicacid and/or ceftazidime/clavulanic acid. The presumptive screening of isolates for AmpC phenotypes was done by testing the organism against cefoxitin. The prevalence of the ESBL carriage was presented in percentages. The association of risk factors to the faecal carriage of ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae was performed by Pearson Chi-squared and Fishers Exact at (p ≤ 0.05).
Result
The prevalence of faecal carriage ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among food handlers was 5.0% (28/565). We found50% (14/28) and3.57% (1/28) ESBL producing bacteria were presumptive AmpC and carbapenemase resistance phenotype. Themost abundant ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae were Klebsiella spp 32.1% (9/28) and Escherichia spp 28.6% (8/28). The use of antibiotics in the last 3 months was found to be significantly associated (P = 0.012) with the faecal carriage of ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae.
Conclusion
The prevalence of faecal carriage of ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae among food handlers in the Gambia is low. The history to use of the antibiotics in the last three months was found to be significantly associated with this prevalence. Therefore, the institution of a robust antimicrobial surveillance and treatment of patients with such infections are necessary to curb the spread of these multidrug resistant bacteria in the country. Rational prescription and usage of the antibiotics especially cephalosporin should be advocated both in public and private health facilities.
Background
The treatment of infectious agents with cephalosporin has been followed by the emergence and dissemination of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) producing bacterial pathogens that confer resistance to third generation cephalosporin [1, 2]. These gram-negative bacteria producing ESBLs have been identified from a range of Enterobacteriaceae in different communities in the world [2]. ESBLs have spread throughout the globe and Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains have been reported as the most common producers of these antibiotic resistant enzymes and causing treatment challenges in nosocomial and community-acquired infections[3]. These infections are responsible for increased morbidity and mortality as the management and care call for expensive drugs and prolonged hospitalization[4]. Studies have demonstrated the isolation of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among of healthy people in communities, who were confirmed with long term carriage potential of these bacteria[5, 6, 7]. Moreover, some researchers have shown that ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae such as E. coli lineages have so far been identical in both isolates from animal products and human samples, thus suggesting their probable transmission across livestock and human [7].
The first outbreak involving ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains was documented in Germany in 1983[8]. Food handlers and animal foods have been implicated in food borne outbreak caused by ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae strains in countries such as Spain [9]. Furthermore, a hospital outbreak report provided evidence that contaminated food could be a transmissible route for K. pneumoniae producing ESBL[10]. In Japan, a faecal ESBL producer carriage study among healthy food handlers found that up to 10 carriers of the ESBL producing bacteria carried these resistant gram negative bacteria up to two years [7]. Similarly in Kenya, 3% of faecal ESBL producer carriage among food handlers was documented [11]. Studies in Vietnam and Algeria revealed that animal food products represent the main reservoir of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E.coli for human infection[12,13]. Poor food handling procedure could have contributed to the contamination of such food products such as sandwiches which serve as transmission vector in those countries.
A polygenetic study have established close relationships between ESBL producing isolates animal based food, seafood, vegetables and human[1,14]. Furthermore, food handlers, hospital staff, patients, animal based food in a hospital setting were found have similar overlapping relationship between ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates from human and meat [15]. Therefore, food handlers and others are at risk for contracting ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae through exposure to contaminated environments such as health-care facilities, farms, livestock, pet, food, ESBL producing health carriers and treatment with third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic [16]. Hence food handlers infected with ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae pose a great threat for the transmission of this AMR bacterium through the food chain in the globe.
In 2011, a food borne studied in The Gambia and Senegal established significant similar detection of virulence genes in salmonella isolates from animal food products and human [17]. Besides, in rural country site, four food handlers of 128 were implicated with carriage of non-typhoid Salmonella enteric strains which were of animal origin [18]. These studies showcased that there exist potential of risk of transmission of antimicrobial multidrug resistance (AMR) food borne pathogens through the food chain in the country. Other clinical studies showed that Enterobacteriaceae spp such Klebsiella spp, Burkholderia cepacia were the common pathogen causing serious bacterial infection among admitted children at the Peadiatric Department of Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital (EFSTH) [19,20]. Ninety-five percent of the children admitted were treated with the antibiotics and majority of these clinical isolates were multidrug especially to the ampicillin which is a monobactem among the first line of antibiotic for the treatment of such infections [19, 20, 21]. Similarly, a retrospective review of causes of urinary tract infections among patients seen at Medical Research Council, The Gambia Unit’s laboratory record in 2013, E. coli and Klebsiella spp accounted for 50% and 10.6% among the most common isolated pathogens [22]. Consequently, information from the antimicrobial multidrug resistance sentinel site at EFSTH has shown increased in the isolation of the gram-negative bacteria are resistant to ceftriaxone. These national studies have implicated few of mother to child possible infection routed have been confirmed but other source of transmission such nosocomial and community [19]. Thus, there is limited data for the prevalence of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae faecal carriage in The Gambian communities. This study is relevant in establishing the prevalence and risk factors of the Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBL faecal carriage among food handlers in schools, who could serve as potential reservoir for the transmission of these pathogens.
Methods and materials
Ethics
The study was approved by The Gambia Government and Medical Research Council Joint ethical committee with a number SCC1416. Written informed consent was obtained from all the enrolled food handlers by their signatures or fingerprints.
Study populationandsite
Across-sectional study was conducted in West Coast Region of The Gambia from July to September 2015, which comprised of two educational regions; West Coast Region 1 and West Coast Region 2. This region was purposely selected because it’s densely populated due to rural-urban drift for socio-economic and academic reasons. The region also housed most of the industries, social amenities and majority of the public and private health facilities [23]. The Lower Basic Schools (LBS) in this region were stratified into two educational regions, then districts. We randomly selected the schools as per the Ministry of Basic and Secondary Education’s (MoBSE) approach of grouping schools as reported in our study [23]. A total of 60 LBS, 30 from each region were selected randomly for the study to meet the 95% confidence interval of the school population. The sample size was calculated using the formula (n = Z2P (1-P)/d2) as done by Daniel 1999 employing the 65% prevalence of the faecal carriage of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae in a community study done in Thailand to yield the sample size [24]. The social mobilization team comprising of staff from Directorate of Health Promotion and Education, Food Safety Authority and Ministry of Basic and Secondary Education were visited with all food handlers registered in the selected schools. Nine food handlers were randomly selected from the list by the social mobilization team and consented to participate in the study at each school. Schools with fewer food handlers were added from the neighboring school food handlers. A faecal sample was collected from each consented food handler.
One stool sample was collected from each food handler in a well labeled transparent and leak proof screw cap plastic container of about 30ml. The samples were immediately recorded by the field staff in the chain of custody form and sample stored at cold chain temperature (2 to 8°C) until delivery at the laboratory within 6 hours. The consented food handlers were interviewed by the field staff with standardized questionnaires looking at their demographic information and other risk factors for the potential carriage of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae.
Laboratory investigation
Time and temperature at which the samples were collected were recorded and signed by the laboratory technician receiving the samples on the chain of custody form. The stool Samples’ processing time and date were recorded in per batch on the sample processing laboratory log book.
Screening for the presumptive ESBLs
Approximately 1g of stool specimen were initially inoculated into the enrichment media (peptone water) which was incubated for 24hr at 37°C and then 100μl was sub-cultured in a selective Chromogenic agar (Drigalski agar & 2mg of cefotaxime) [25]. The presumptive ESBLs colonies were then further purified in the nutrient agar and then the species were confirmed.
Phenotypic confirmatory test for ESBLs
The presumptive ESBLs were confirmed for EBSL phenotype using double disc diffusion test and interpreted by following the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [26]. A Pure culture of identified ESBLs was prepared to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard in 0.85% saline and inoculated by spreading using sterile swabs on Muller Hinton Agar medium.
The following antibiotics were analyzed; cefotaxime (30μg), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (30 μg/10μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (30 μg/10 μg), were used as recommended by CLSI-2015 to establish the status of the ESBL phenotypes [26]. The confirmatory analysis for ESBL was determined as the zone of inhibition of cefotaxime and or ceftazidime to ≥5mm from that of cefotaxime/clavulanic acid and or ceftazidime/clavulanic acid. The presumptive screening of isolates for AmpC phenotypes was done by testing the organism against cefoxitin. The plates were then incubated aerobically at 37°C for 18 to 24 hours. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (positive control) and Escherichia coli strain ATCC 25922 (negative control) were used for quality control [CLSI-2015].
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the ESBL producing isolates
The ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae strains were tested for susceptibility to ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, ampicillin, imipenem and cotrimoxazole using the disc diffusion method and applied the CLSI breakpoint for the interpretation of the degree of susceptibility [26].
Statistical analysis: the data was entered into the Epi-Info database and Microsoft Excel version 2010 software which was screened and cross-checked before the analysis. The categorical data were analyzed using the SPSS version 16 software. Pearson Chi-Square and fisher’s exact test by crosstab method was used to determine the association of risk and socio-demographic factors to the faecal carriage of ESBLs Enterobacteriaceae. The statistical significant value was set at P<0.05.
Results
Demographic characteristic of the food handlers
Out of the 600 food handlers enrolled, 565 participants had a complete dataset and were analyzed. A total of 561 out of 565(99.3%) of food handlers were females with a mean age of 37years. Most of the study participants stayed less than 5km from the nearest health facility. The majority of food handlers have been selling and preparing food for not more than 4 years and are been certified. Only (17%) of food handlers have been trained on food safety procedure as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study food handlers in West Coast Region.
| Characteristics | Number of respondents | % | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female gender | 561 | 99.3 | 0.452 |
| Age (mean)yrs | 37 | 0.112 | |
| Staying in homes <5km from health facility | 551 | 98.5 | 0.698 |
| Raring domestic animals. | 351 | 62.1 | 0.569 |
| Length of handling/selling food for ≤4yrs | 409 | 72.38 | 0.24 |
| Trained for food handling | 101 | 17.9 | 0.00 |
| Certified for handling food | 504 | 89.4 | 0.103 |
| Know the principle of food safety | 515 | 91.2 | 0.002 |
The study found that 5.0% (28/565) of food handlers were faecal carriers of Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBL. Of these 28 ESBL producing isolates, 85.7% (24/28) were found in West Coast Region1, whilst 14.3% (4/28) in West Coast Region 2 as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Distribution of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae carriage among food handlers in West Region (Region1 and Region 2).
| Number tested and confirmed cases of ESBL per Region | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number Tested | Number confirmed | |||
| N | % | N | % | |
| Region 1 | 266 | 47.1 | 24 | 85.7 |
| Region 2 | 299 | 52.9 | 4 | 14.3 |
| Total | 565 | 100 | 28 | 100 |
The study found 28 bacteria which produced ESBL of which there were 14 species producing ESBL amongst the food handlers in west coast region of The Gambia. Majority of the species 85.7% (12/14) were belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae. The predominant were Klebsiella pneumonia 32.1% (9/28), E.coli 28.6% (8/28). This study also found that 50% (14/28) of these ESBL producing isolates were presumptiveAmpC producers whilst 14% (1/28) had carbapenemase production potential as shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Distribution of the species of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among food handlers in West Coast Region.
| Bacterial Isolates | ESBL producing isolates | ESBL producing ampC isolates | ESBL producing Carbapenemase isolates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| E. coli | 8 | 28.6 | 4 | 14.3 | 1 | 3.6 |
| Klebsiella pneumonia | 9 | 32.1 | 4 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 |
| Enterobacter cloacae | 2 | 7.1 | 2 | 7.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Serratia fonticola | 1 | 3.6 | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Serratia liquefacieus | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Citrobacter freundii | 2 | 7.1 | 2 | 7.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cronobacter spp | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vibrio fluvalis | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pantoea spp | 1 | 3.6 | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Cedecea davisae | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 100 | 14 | 50 | 1 | 3.6 |
All the ESBL producing isolates were found completely resistant to cefotaxime; ceftriaxone and cefuroxime and ceftazidime. Moreover, 96.4% (27/28) of these isolates were resistant to, ampicillin. Resistance to other antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole and nitrofurantoin were found with the following resistance 62.9% (18/28), 89.9% (25/28), 78.6%(22/28), and 67.9% (19/28) respectivelyto these strains. Only 3.6% (1/28) of these ESBL producing isolates were resistant to imipenem as shown in Table 4.
Table 4. ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae resistant pattern to antibiotics among food handlers.
| Antibiotics | Resistant | Intermediate | Sensitive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage (%) | Number | Percentage (%) | Number | Percentage (%) | |
| Cefotaxime | 28 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftriaxone | 28 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftazidime | 28 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceforuxime | 28 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cefoxitin | 14 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 50 |
| Imipenem | 1 | 3.6 | 6 | 21.4 | 21 | 75 |
| Nitrofurantoin | 19 | 67.9 | 9 | 32.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 18 | 62.9 | 5 | 17.9 | 5 | 17.9 |
| Ampicillin | 27 | 96.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.6 |
| Tetracycline | 25 | 89.9 | 1 | 3.6 | 2 | 7.1 |
| Cotrimoxazole | 22 | 78.6 | 2 | 7.1 | 4 | 14.3 |
All the Klebsiellapneumoniae ESBL producing strains were found completely resistant to the following cephalosporin: cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and ceforuxime. Besides, these isolates were also found with 100% resistant to other antibiotics such as ampicillin and cotrimoxazole. Our study found that these Klebsiella pneumonia ESBLs producing isolates were also resistant to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and tetracycline with following rates 77.8% (7/9), 66.7% (6/9) and 88.9% (8/9) respectively. Only 33.3% (3/9) and 11.1% (1/9) were resistant to cefoxitin and imipenem respectively as in Table 5.
Table 5. Antibiotic resistant pattern of Klebsiella pneumonia producing ESBLs among food handlers.
| Antibiotics | Susceptibility | Intermediate | Resistant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Cefotaxime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Ceftazidime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Ceforuxime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Cefoxitin | 6 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 33.3 |
| Imipenem | 8 | 88.9 | 1 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Nitrofurantoin | 1 | 11.1 | 2 | 22.2 | 6 | 66.7 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 1 | 11.1 | 1 | 11.1 | 7 | 77.8 |
| Ampicillin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Tetracycline | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11.1 | 8 | 88.9 |
| Cotrimoxazole | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
The study found that 100% (8/8) of the E.coli producing strains were resistant to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, ampicillin and tetracycline as shown in Table 6. These strains were also highly resistant to the ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, and nitrofurantoin with the following rates: 75% (6/8), 87.5% (7/8) and 75% (6/8) respectively. Of 50% (4/8) of these ESBL producing strains were also resistant to cefoxitin. Only 12.5% (1/8) of these strains were found to be resistant to imipenem as in Table 6.
Table 6. Antibiotic resistant pattern of E. coli producing ESBLs among food handlers.
| Antibiotic | Susceptibility | Intermediate | Resistant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Cefotaxime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Ceftazidime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Ceforuxime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Cefoxitin | 4 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 50 |
| Imipenem | 5 | 62.5 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 12.5 |
| Nitrofurantoin | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 6 | 75 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 1 | 12.5 | 1 | 12.5 | 6 | 75 |
| Ampicillin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Tetracycline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100 |
| Cotrimoxazole | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12.5 | 7 | 87.5 |
Most of the demographic characteristics have no strong association with the Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBL. Lack of food handling training and knowledge of the principle of food safety had a strong association with the ESBL carriage with P values of 0.001 and 0.002 respectively. The uses of antibiotics in the last 3 months have shown some significant degree of association as a risk factor to the carriage of this Enterobacteriaceae. Other risks factors such as had diarrhea episodes in the last three months (p = 0.042) and compliance to completion of prescribing antibiotics (p = 0.0555) were found to have some evidence of correlation to this Enterobacteriaceae as inTable 7.
Table 7. Risk factors for faecal carriage of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among food handlers in West Coast Region.
| Risk factors | Number of respondent | % | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normally wash hands with soap under running water | 560 | 99.1 | 0.385 |
| Have pit latrine toilet facilities | 329 | 58.3 | 0.325 |
| Admitted in a hospital in the last three months | 13 | 2.3 | 0.134 |
| Had medical instrumentation while on admission | 4 | 0.71 | 0.385 |
| Escorted /visited a sick family member to the hospital in the last three months | 84 | 14.9 | 0.934 |
| Stayed with somebody who been admitted in the hospital. | 89 | 15.8 | 0.741 |
| Used antibiotics in the last three months | 185 | 32.7 | 0.012 |
| Bought and used antibiotics from street vendors | 17 | 3 | 0.83 |
| Used antibiotics without consultation of medical practitioner | 13 | 2.3 | 0.418 |
| complete taking your prescribed antibiotics | 545 | 96.4 | 0.055 |
| Had diarrhea in the last three months | 68 | 12.03 | 0.042 |
| Had urinary tract infection in last three months | 13 | 2.3 | 0.968 |
Discussion
The study found that 99.3% (561/565) of the food handlers were female in their late 30 years. Most of these food handlers were not trained on food safety procedure although certified for food handling through laboratory screening for salmonella, Shigella and other intestinal parasitic infection within the a period of six months. This finding comparable to that foodhandlers’ study conducted in Kiang West of the country where female folk dominated the food preparation and services which reflected the inherent cultural practice in TheGambia[18]. However, a study reported that male folk dominated the food handlers’ industry in Kenya[11].
The prevalence of faecal carriage of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among these food handlers was 5.0% (28/565). This low prevalence of ESBL faecal carriage is similarto that of the studies in Guyana, Senegal, Japan, Kenya in communities [7,11,27,28]. However, very high prevalence of ESBL carriage were the reports in Thailand, Guinea Bissau, and Tanzania [24, 29, 30]. Majority of these ESBL carriers were found in of West Coast Health Region One which represented the bustling districts with all social amenities. Our findings have shown that ESBL carriers were abundant in cosmopolitan districts whilst very few in remote and less developed districts in the country in as other studies [28,31]. These infected food handlers pose a threat for the spread of the multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria in schools, their families and communities in which they prepare and serve food. If not treated some of these carriers of ESBLs could serve as long term reservoir for the transmission of these pathogen as demonstrated in a cohort study of food handlers in Japan [7].
We found that Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli were the most abundant bacterial species producing ESBLs as shown in Table 3. This finding is similar in the retrospective study of aetiologies of urinary tract infection where the most predominant a etiologies were E coli and K. pneumoniae in the Medical Research Unit laboratory records in 2013[22]. Although many studies have documented K.pneumoniaeinfected to be associated with nosocomial route of spread, our report have shownpotential community base transmission route through food handlers. Of these Enterobacteriaceae 50% (14/28) were found to produce AmpC as found in other studies. Our study found few of the isolates 5.5%(1/28) were presumptive carbapenemase phenotypes as was also found in a study in Thailand [24]. This finding shows that potential risk exists for the spread of community acquired urinary tract infections and invasive infection.
Our study found that the Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBLs were all resistant to ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime.In fact, ceftriaxone is the only 3rd generation cephalosporin available in the country for advanced care and management was found totally resistant to these gram negative bacteria. These ESBL producing bacteria were almost all resistant to the first line of antibiotics for the treatment gram negative as recommended in The national treatmentGuideline[21]. Furthermore, we found that 62.9% of the gram negative bacteria were resistant to ciprofloxacin which is the recommended second of treatment.
This antibiotic resistant trend is comparable to the studies conducted at the paediatric department of EFSTH hospital were ampicillin was the most resistant antibiotic[19,20]. Other studies in the country also discovered highly AMR patterns among salmonella and Helicobacter pylori isolates [17,32]. A study had found similarities among isolate of faecal carriage of ESBL with molecular similarities of those causing urinary tract infections and producing ESBL which poses food handlers who are ESBL carrier as potential threat for transmission of infections in communities.
This study has found that the faecal carriage of ESBLs in food-handlers was significantly associated with history of antibiotics usage, history of diarrheal episodes in the last 3 months and lack of knowledge in food safety practices as found in other studies [2,4]. High prescription and usage of the antibiotics have been reported in studies conducted at EFSTH [19, 20]. However, ESBL carriages were not associated with the study conducted in Japan [7]. Admission in the hospital, instrumentation whilst in admission and staying with a hospitalized individual was not significantly associated with the carrier of the ESBL as were demonstrated in a study [4, 33]. This study did not find significant association between ESBL carriage with rearing domestic animals as in other studies [24]. It was found that the proximity to the health facility was also not importantly associated with carriage of such ESBLs as was found in the study in Guinea Bissau [29]. Therefore, treatment of patients with the antibiotics such as cephalosporin increases the risk for acquiring ESBL carriage and hence it will be prudent for the country to institutes stewardship for rationale antibiotic prescriptions and usage among health workers and communities.
Limitation
The limitations of this study were the lack of a molecular confirmatory test to establish genotypes of ESBLs in The Gambia, however, the studies from west Africa found the CTXM-15, and CTXM-1 are the most common [29, 28]. Also, the participants were unable to provide their medical records in order to confirm the prescribed antibiotics in order to show association with the faecal carriage of ESBLs. Most of the study participants were female which tend to show bias to the gender though some studies had found ESBL carriage to be more associated with male. The data analysis associated risk factor for ESBL carriage was limited to chi square, fishers’ exact analysis with less than p value less 0.05 as significant relationship. One rare ESBL bacteria with susceptible to a monobactem may require further investigation. The study design was limited because there was no follow-up to treat ESBL carrier and find how they could remain the infections as done in Japan[7].
Conclusion
The study for the first of its kind has established low prevalence of ESBL faecal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae in the food-handlers in the country who could pose a threat for onward transmission of such infection if not treated. It was also found that most of the antibiotics available for the treatment of these gram-negative bacterial infections were resistant to these ESBL phenotypes thus posing a threat to the management of such infections in The Gambia. Use of antibiotics and lack of knowledge on food safety were major risk factors for the carriage of the ESBL. It will be ideal to strengthen the antimicrobial surveillance system and regular screening of clinical isolates production of ESBLs and its treatment and control strategies. Antibiotic stewardship should be advocated amongst health care workers and the communities should be sensitized prudent use of antibiotic.
Supporting information
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Mrs Minato Yuki of Food Safety and Zoonosis Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland for administrative support in the implementation of the study. The authors also thank the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare staff (Alhagie Papa Sey, Amadou Wurie Jallow), Ministry of Basic Education staff (Osainou Jobe and Basirou Mbenga) and Food safety and Quality Authority(Sulayman Jadama) for their active participation in the fieldwork. We also appreciate editorial review of the manuscript by Mr AbdoulieTaal of the Epidemiology and Disease Control Department of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. We recognized the acceptance of the food-handlers to willingly participate in the study. The authors acknowledge the commitment of The Gambia Government and Medical Research Council Joint Ethical Committee in reviewing and approving the study.
Data Availability
There are ethical restrictions on publicly sharing the data used in this study. These restrictions were approved by the Gambia Government and Medical Research Council Joint Committee. The data not included in this manuscript, however, is made available upon request. Requests for data access should be sent to the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dr Cherno Omar Barry (ps-mohsw@cobarry.org). Some of the anonymized data has been uploaded as a Supporting Information file.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the World Health Organization, Afro GFN/AGISAR PROJECT with grant number SPHQ14-APW-3979, and the grant was received by Mr Bakary Sanneh.
References
- 1.Voets GM, Platteel TN, Fluit AC, Scharringa J, Schapendonk CM, Stuart JC,et al. Population distribution of Beta-lactamase conferring resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in human clinical Enterobacteriaceae in the Netherlands. PloS one. 2012. December 20; 7(12):e52102 10.1371/journal.pone.0052102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calbo E, Romaní V, Xercavins M, Gómez L, Vidal CG, Quintana S, et al. Risk factors for community-onset urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli harbouring extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006. February 21; 57(4):780–3. 10.1093/jac/dkl035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2001. October 1; 14(4):933–51. 10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Briongos‐Figuero LS, Gómez-Traveso T, Bachiller-Luque P, Domínguez-Gil González M, Gómez-Nieto A, Palacios-Martín T, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors and comorbidity for urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacteria. International journal of clinical practice. 2012. September 1; 66(9):891–6. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02991.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kang CI, Wi YM, Lee MY, Ko KS, Chung DR, Peck KR,et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of community onset infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012. February 1; 50(2):312–7. 10.1128/JCM.06002-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pitout JD, Nordmann P, Laupland KB, Poirel L. Emergence of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in the community. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005. May 25; 56(1):52–9. 10.1093/jac/dki166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nakane K, Kawamura K, Goto K, Arakawa Y. Long-term colonization by blaCTX-M-harboring Escherichia coli in healthy Japanese people engaged in food handling. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2016. March 15; 82(6):1818–27. 10.1128/AEM.02929-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Knothe H, Shah P, Krcmery V, Antal M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable resistance to cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole and cefuroxime in clinical isolates of Klebsiellapneumoniae and Serratiamarcescens. Infection. 1983. November 1; 11(6):315–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lavilla S, Gonzalez-Lopez JJ, Miro E, Dominguez A, Llagostera M, Bartolome RM, et al. Dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing bacteria: the food-borne outbreak lesson. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008. March 12; 61(6):1244–51. 10.1093/jac/dkn093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calbo E, Freixas N, Xercavins M, Riera M, Nicolás C, Monistrol O, et al. Foodborne nosocomial outbreak of SHV1 and CTX-M-15–producing Klebsiellapneumoniae: epidemiology and control. Clinical infectious diseases. 2011. March 15; 52(6):743–9. 10.1093/cid/ciq238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Juma AO. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and genotypic characterization of selected Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from food handlers in Nairobi, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, COHES-JKUAT).2018
- 12.Nguyen DP, Nguyen TA, Le TH, Tran NM, Ngo TP, Dang VC, et al. Dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli within the food distribution system of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. BioMed research international. 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yaici L, Haenni M, Métayer V, Saras E, Zekar FM, Ayad M,et al. Spread of ESBL/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiellapneumoniae in the community through ready-to-eat sandwiches in Algeria. International journal of food microbiology. 2017. March 20; 245:66–72. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davis GS, Price LB. Recent research examining links among Klebsiella pneumoniae from food, food animals, and human extraintestinal infections. Current environmental health reports. 2016. June 1;3(2):128–35 10.1007/s40572-016-0089-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stewardson AJ, Renzi G, Maury N, Vaudaux C, Brassier C, Fritsch E,et al. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hospital Food: A Risk Assessment. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2014. April; 35(4):375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ben-Ami R, Rodríguez-Baño J, Arslan H, Pitout JD, Quentin C, Calbo ES,et al. A multinational survey of risk factors for infection with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in nonhospitalized patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009. September 1;49(5):682–90 10.1086/604713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dione MM, Ikumapayi U, Saha D, Mohammed NI, Adegbola RA, Geerts S,et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates in The Gambia and Senegal. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2011. November 4; 5(11):765–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bradbury RS, Barbé B, Jacobs J, Jallow AT, Camara KC, Colley M, et al. Enteric pathogens of food sellers in rural The Gambia with incidental finding of Myxobolus species (Protozoa: Myxozoa). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2015. March 10; 109(5):334–9. 10.1093/trstmh/trv020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Okomo UA. Neonatal Infections; a hospital-based study in The Gambia examining aetiology and associated maternal Colonisation (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine).2018
- 20.Chaw PS, Schlinkmann KM, Raupach-Rosin H, Karch A, Huebner J, Mikolajczyk R. A retrospective analysis of paediatric inpatient data on antibiotic use in a teaching hospital in The Gambia. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2017. August;79(08/09):V-269 [Google Scholar]
- 21.The Gambia Standard Treatment Guidelines Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Fourth Edition, 2017
- 22.NyimaSumareh. Aetiologies of Urinary Tract Infection from Patients seen at Medical Research CouncilUnit, Fajara, The Gambia in 2013. Foundation Degree in Biomedical Science, ST. GeorgesUniversity, UK, Thesis, 2014.
- 23.Jallow HS, Kebbeh A, Sagnia O, Fofona B, Sambou SM, Camara Y,et al. High Prevalence of Intestinal Parasite Carriage Among Food Handlers in The Gambia. International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology. 2017. March 9; 2(1):1. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Luvsansharav UO, Hirai I, Nakata A, Imura K, Yamauchi K, Niki M,et al. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with faecal carriage of CTX-M β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in rural Thai communities. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012. April 18; 67(7):1769–74. 10.1093/jac/dks118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baguy OM, Nathalie GK, Rose KN, Stephane KO, Djeneba OG, Valerie GB, et al. Evaluation of Drigalski agar supplemented with ceftazidime (2 mg/L) for selective isolation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteria. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014. July 16; 8(29):2758–65. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wayne PA. Clinical and laboratory standards institute Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2015; 12th ed M02–A12. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Woerther PL, Angebault C, Jacquier H, Clermont O, El Mniai A, Moreau B, et al. Characterization of faecal extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a remote community during a long time period. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013. October 1; 57(10):5060–6. 10.1128/AAC.00848-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruppé E, Woerther PL, Diop A, Sene AM, Da Costa A, Arlet G,et al. Carriage of CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli isolates among children living in a remote village in Senegal. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2009. July 1; 53(7):3135–7. 10.1128/AAC.00139-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Isendahl J, Turlej-Rogacka A, Manjubaa C, Rodrigues A, Giske CG, Nauclér P. Faecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae in children in Guinea-Bissau: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2012. December 20;7(12):e51981 10.1371/journal.pone.0051981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moremi N, Claus H, Vogel U, Mshana SE. Faecal carriage of CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among street children dwelling in Mwanza city, Tanzania. PloS one. 2017. September 12; 12(9):e0184592 10.1371/journal.pone.0184592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Woerther PL, Angebault C, Jacquier H, Clermont O, El Mniai A, Moreau B, et al. Characterization of faecal extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a remote community during a long time period. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013. October 1; 57(10):5060–6. 10.1128/AAC.00848-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Secka O, Berg DE, Antonio M, Corrah T, Tapgun M, Walton R,et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance patterns among Helicobacter pylori strains from The The Gambia, West Africa. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013. March 1; 57(3):1231–7. 10.1128/AAC.00517-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kurz MS, Bayingana C, Ndoli JM, Sendegeya A, Durst A, Pfüller R, et al. Intense pre-admission carriage and further acquisition of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae among patients and their caregivers in a tertiary hospital in Rwanda. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2017. February 1; 22(2):210–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
There are ethical restrictions on publicly sharing the data used in this study. These restrictions were approved by the Gambia Government and Medical Research Council Joint Committee. The data not included in this manuscript, however, is made available upon request. Requests for data access should be sent to the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dr Cherno Omar Barry (ps-mohsw@cobarry.org). Some of the anonymized data has been uploaded as a Supporting Information file.