Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2018 Aug 13;9(8):842. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0516-y

How PERK kinase conveys stress signals to nuclear factor-κB to mediate estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells?

Ping Fan 1,, V Craig Jordan 1
PMCID: PMC6089992  PMID: 30104654

Antihormone therapies using a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor are standard strategies for treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer1. However, acquired resistance to antihormone therapies is inevitable. Paradoxically, estrogen (E2)-induced apoptosis was an unanticipated discovery in studies of long-term antihormone therapies that produced selective pressure on breast cancer cells to create selective cell populations vulnerable to E2-induced apoptosis in vivo2 and in vitro3,4. This finding is clinically relevant to low-dose E2 treatment of aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer, with a 30% clinical benefit rate5, and it is a mechanistic interpretation for the decrease in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the conjugated equine estrogen alone trial performed by the Women’s Health Initiative6. All of these clinically relevant findings encouraged us to identify the key molecules involved in E2-induced apoptosis to improve the therapeutic effects of E2 on endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Accumulation of stress responses, including endoplasmic reticulum, oxidative, and inflammatory stresses, is a major mechanism of E2-induced apoptosis in long-term E2-deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells7,8. Two cellular organelles—mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum—participate in mediation of E2-induced stresses8. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to the release of reactive oxygen species and impairs redox homeostasis8. Three sensors of unfolded protein response—protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring protein 1 alpha (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF-6)—are initially activated by E2, each having different functions in the endoplasmic reticulum stress8,9. PERK attenuates protein translation, which is identified as an important mediator of E2-induced apoptosis8, whereas ATF-6 and IRE1α are involved in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of phospholipids9. The endoplasmic reticulum stress occurs prior to the oxidative stress after exposure to E2 in LTED breast cancer cells8. Of note, inhibition of PERK kinase activity completely blocks oxidative stress10, indicating close crosstalk between these two stresses. Furthermore, a variety of inflammatory factors, such as interleukin-6, fatty-acid desaturase 1, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), are activated by E2 with different dynamics7,8. Induction of TNFα expression peaks after 3 days of E2 treatment and is confirmed to be an important factor that induces apoptosis in LTED MCF-7:5 C cells8,10. Nevertheless, how E2 induces TNFα is unknown and requires elucidation.

TNFα is well known to be a nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-dependent gene10. NF-κB is a critical stress-responsive transcription factor. Activated sensors of endoplasmic reticulum stress and associated inflammatory responses can activate NF-κB to modulate stress responses11. However, literature contains no reports of activation of NF-κB by E2 to mediate stress-associated apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. This knowledge is very important to understand E2 therapy for aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer. Our recent study demonstrated that E2 differentially modulates NF-κB activity depending on the treatment time10. E2 initially has significant potential to suppress NF-κB activation; in other words, E2 completely blocks TNFα-induced activation of NF-κB. The lipid metabolism-associated transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) is activated by E2, which is responsible for suppression of NF-κB activity in LTED MCF-7:5 C cells10. This result supports the existence of a trans-repressive relationship between ERα and NF-κB12. However, NF-κB p65 DNA-binding activity is increased when E2 treatment time is prolonged, leading to the induction of TNFα expression in LTED MCF-7:5 C cells10. Unlike the regulatory mechanism of TNFα, activation of NF-κB by E2 is independent of the canonical IκBα signaling pathway10, suggesting novel modulation of NF-κB directly in the nucleus. This delayed activation of NF-κB by E2 also indicates that some other factors are involved in overcoming the initial suppression of NF-κB activity by ERα.

PERK is a key driver responsible for activation of NF-κB after E2 treatment10. This is a novel finding that further identifies mechanisms of E2-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. The basic biological function of PERK is to reduce unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum by phosphorylating the downstream signal eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α)13. Although eIF2α was reported to activate NF-κB by decreasing the levels of IκBα in mouse embryonic fibroblasts14, our results demonstrated that PERK kinase does not rely on eIF2α phosphorylation to activate NF-κB in LTED breast cancer cells10. Thus, how does this kinase in the endoplasmic reticulum activate nuclear NF-κB under LTED conditions? Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is identified as a stress-responsive mediator that is phosphorylated by PERK to increase NF-κB DNA-binding activity10. Furthermore, a specific STAT3 nuclear translocation inhibitor remarkably decreases NF-κB DNA-binding activity, suggesting that a DNA level interaction is sufficient for STAT3 to activate NF-κB. These findings suggest that PERK kinase conveys stress signals from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus through activation of STAT3 and NF-κB under LTED conditions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. PERK is a key driver that activates the NF-κB/TNFα axis in LTED MCF-7:5 C cells.

Fig. 1

E2 preferentially increases C/EBPβ expression, which suppresses NF-κB DNA binding. E2 also activates PERK in response to accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. This stress kinase phosphorylates STAT3 to increase NF-κB DNA-binding activity, leading to induction of TNFα expression

In summary, several stress-responsive transcription factors, including C/EBPβ, NF-κB, and STAT3, participate in stress responses to modulate E2-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. The regulatory relationship between C/EBPβ and NF-κB also suggests that E2-induced apoptosis is closely associated with lipid metabolism. However, the crosstalk between stress responses and transcription factors is complex, depending on the cellular context and inflammatory microenvironment. Despite the fact that MCF-7:5 C and MCF-7:2 A cells are derived from the same parental MCF-7 cells under LTED conditions, NF-κB is constitutively activated in MCF-7:5 C cells but not in MCF-7:2 A cells10, whereas MCF-7:2 A cells have a stronger antioxidant system than do MCF-7:5 C cells15. These different phenotypes lead to distinctive responses of MCF-7:5 C and MCF-7:2 A cells to E2 exposure. For instance, the NF-κB/TNFα axis is highly active in MCF-7:5 C cells but not in MCF-7:2 A cells10. Although E2 activates PERK similarly in MCF-7:2 A and MCF-7:5 C cells8,15, the NF-κB/TNFα axis is not quickly activated in MCF-7:2 A cells in the same way as in MCF-7:5 C cells10. This suggests that PERK kinase alone is not sufficient to activate NF-κB, depending on its interactions with other transcription factors. Furthermore, NF-κB can function as a key mediator of oxidative stress11. Ongoing studies are focused on how NF-κB modulates oxidative stress in LTED breast cancer cells. These data will provide an important rationale for finding target molecules to improve the therapeutic effects of E2-induced apoptosis on endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Acknowledgements

V.C.J. is supported by a Department of Defense Breast Cancer Center of Excellence Award (W81XWH-06-1-0590), a subcontract from Stand Up To Cancer (American Association for Cancer Research; grant number SU2C-AACR-DT0409), a grant from Susan G. Komen (Award number SAC100009), and the NIH/NCI under award number P30-CA016672. The views and opinions of the author do not reflect those of the US Army or Department of Defense. We thank Donald R. Norwood in the Department of Scientific Publications at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for editing the manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jordan VC, Brodie AM. Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Steroids. 2007;72:7–25. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2006.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yao K, et al. Antitumor action of physiological estradiol on tamoxifen-stimulated breast tumors grown in athymic mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:2028–2036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Song RX, et al. Effect of long-term estrogen deprivation on apoptotic responses of breast cancer cells to 17 beta-estradiol. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1714–1723. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.22.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lewis JS, et al. Intrinsic mechanism of estradiol-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells resistant to estrogen deprivation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1746–1759. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ellis MJ, et al. Lower-dose vs high-dose oral estradiol therapy of hormone receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer: a phase 2 randomized study. JAMA. 2009;302:774–780. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anderson GL, et al. Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:476–486. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70075-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ariazi EA, et al. Estrogen induces apoptosis in estrogen deprivation-resistant breast cancer through stress responses as identified by global gene expression across time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18879–18886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115188108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fan P, et al. c-Src modulates estrogen-induced stress and apoptosis in estrogen-deprived breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:4510–4520. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fan P, et al. Integration of downstream signals of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor by endoplasmic reticulum stress for estrogen-induced growth or apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015;13:1367–1376. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fan P, et al. Modulation of nuclear factor-kappa B activation by the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor PERK to mediate estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4:15. doi: 10.1038/s41420-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature. 2008;454:455–462. doi: 10.1038/nature07203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cvoro A, et al. Distinct roles of unliganded and liganded estrogen receptors in transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. 2006;21:555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature. 1999;397:271–274. doi: 10.1038/16729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deng J, et al. Translational repression mediates activation of nuclear factor kappa B by phosphorylated translation initiation factor 2. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:10161–10168. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.23.10161-10168.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sweeney EE, Fan P, Jordan VC. Mechanisms underlying differential response to estrogen-induced apoptosis in long-term estrogen-deprived breast cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;44:1529–1538. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES