Skip to main content
BMC Nephrology logoLink to BMC Nephrology
. 2018 Aug 2;19:193. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0994-2

Chronic kidney disease with genitourinary tuberculosis: old disease but ongoing complication

Eun Jin Kim 1, Woonji Lee 2, Woo Yong Jeong 2,3, Hen Choi 2,3, In Young Jung 2,3, Jin Young Ahn 2,3, Su Jin Jeong 2,3, Nam Su Ku 2,3,✉,#, Jun Yong Choi 2,3, Young Hwa Choi 1,✉,#, Young Goo Song 2,3, June Myung Kim 2,3
PMCID: PMC6090963  PMID: 30071831

Abstract

Background

Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) is a type of extrapulmonary TB that exerts a deleterious effect on renal function by promoting renal calcification and ureteric stricture. Therefore, we investigated the risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in GUTB patients after the end of treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Data from patients (>18 years of age) with GUTB were collected from January 2005 to July 2016. CKD was defined as a glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2 after the end of treatment.

Results

In total, 56 patients with GUTB (46.4% males; mean age 52.8 ± 16.6 years) were enrolled in the study. CKD developed in 11 (19.6%) patients and end-stage renal disease in 4 (7.1%). In a univariate analysis, older age (p = 0.029), microscopic haematuria (p = 0.019), proteinuria (p = 0.029), acute renal failure (ARF) (p < 0.001) and a positive polymerase chain reaction-based test result for TB in the urine (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with decreased renal function. In a multivariate analysis, ARF (odds ratio [OR], 54.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52–1944.00; p = 0.032) and old age (OR, 54.26; 95% CI, 1.52–1932.94; p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients.

Conclusions

ARF and old age were independent risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients. Therefore, in elderly GUTB patients with ARF at the time of diagnosis, regular follow-up of renal function should be performed even after the end of treatment.

Keywords: Genitourinary tuberculosis, Chronic kidney disease, Risk factor

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is an important unresolved public health issue, affecting millions of people each year. In 2015, TB was one of the top 10 infectious causes of death worldwide; there were 10.4 million new TB cases, equivalent to 142 cases per 100,000 population, and 1.4 million deaths due to TB, with an additional 0.4 million deaths resulting from TB among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive persons [1]. South Korea has an intermediate burden of TB; according to the Korea Center for Disease Control, the estimated TB incidence is 63.2 cases per 100,000 population (in 2015, n = 32,181). Extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) accounted for 13.0% of all new cases reported in 2015 (n = 6631). Genitourinary TB (GUTB) is a type of EPTB that infected 199 individuals in South Korea in 2015, accounting for 3.0% of all EPTB cases [2, 3].

Although GUTB is a rare form of EPTB, it is an important cause of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). The kidneys are the most common site of GUTB, with bacteria spreading haematogenously. Tuberculous bacilli can lead to granuloma formation in glomeruli and entry into the medullary interstitium. Subsequently, renal papilla destruction can develop due to calyceal ulceration and involvement of the collecting system. This destruction may extend towards the urothelium and induce stricture formation, resulting in hydroureter and hydronephrosis. Renal calcification in GUTB is common, and patients with renal TB can develop bladder contracture. In addition, TB can affect the male and female genital tracts [4, 5]. GUTB induces end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 5.7% of patients [5]. According to the European Dialysis and Transplant Association registry, 0.65% of new dialysis cases are caused by renal TB [6]. In Korea, there were 14,756 new dialysis patients in 2015, of whom 0.1% required dialysis because of GUTB [7, 8].

However, in a previous autopsy study, only 50% of patients with GUTB were symptomatic, and only 18% had received a clinical diagnosis [5]. Additionally, the clinical manifestations of GUTB are nonspecific [9]. Thus, the diagnosis is often delayed, during which GUTB progression may lead to CKD due to parenchymal destruction and obstructive uropathy. Therefore, we investigated the characteristics of urogenital TB in adult patients with no history of CKD in a single-centre retrospective observational study and identified risk factors for CKD development after ending GUTB treatment.

Methods

Study population and design

We conducted this retrospective study at the Severance Hospital, a 2400-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital and tertiary care referral hospital in Seoul, South Korea. We enrolled participants older than 18 years of age diagnosed with GUTB. We identified patients with ICD-10 codes A18.1, B90.1 and N33.0 from January 2005 to July 2016 from electronic medical records and enrolled only those who started and completed the treatment during the study period. Clinical and laboratory data at the time of GUTB diagnosis, including age, sex, medical history, follow-up duration and symptoms, were collected. To assess renal function, serum creatinine levels were reported before treatment and at the 6- and 12-month post-treatment follow-ups. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). We also investigated the diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and outcomes of GUTB patients during a recent 10-year period in one centre in Korea to identify risk factors for CKD developing after ending treatment. All surgical techniques were investigated included all ablative surgery and reconstructive surgery between diagnosis and during medical treatment. We excluded patients with a follow-up duration of <1 year, unfulfilled GUTB diagnostic criteria, pre-existing CKD and insufficient data. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System Clinical Trial Center.

Definitions

The diagnosis of GUTB was defined as the presence of any clinical finding plus a positive result for one of the following: (1) acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in urine, (2) urine culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), (3) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for M. tuberculosis in urine or (4) histopathological evidence of TB in any GU tissue specimen. A histological diagnosis of TB was confirmed by identifying caseating necrosis, loose aggregates of epithelioid histiocytes and Langerhans giant cells in tissue specimens [6, 10]. Immunosuppressant use was defined as a daily dose of ≥20 mg prednisolone-equivalent steroid, monoclonal antibodies, antimetabolite drugs or T-cell inhibitors within 30 days prior to diagnosis of GUTB. Pre-TB (pre-existing) CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months before diagnosis of GUTB or a self-reported history. Acute renal failure (ARF) was defined according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria (increased serum creatinine level ≥ 1.5-fold compared with baseline or by ≥0.3 mg/dL). We used the serum creatinine level to investigate the presence of ARF at the time of GUTB diagnosis. The eGFR was calculated from the serum creatinine level using the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) equation [11]. Microscopic haematuria was defined as the excretion of more than two red blood cells per high-power field in a centrifuged urine specimen and pyuria as the excretion of more than five white blood cells. Proteinuria was defined as more than one positive urine dipstick test. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin level <11 g/dL according to the KDIGO guidelines based on the target for renal anaemia therapy [12].

Decreased kidney function and poor outcome

CKD group was defined as an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 after completing GUTB treatment. We used the serum creatinine level between 6 months and 1 year after completion of GUTB treatment to investigate the presence of CKD. Patients with a history of CKD at the time of GUTB diagnosis (pre-TB CKD) were excluded. To assess kidney function, serum creatinine levels were determined before treatment and at the 6- and 12-month post-treatment follow-ups. After the treatment was completed, any surgical treatment, recurrence, ESRD development, and all cause mortality were investigated.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (ver. 23.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To identify risk factors for CKD, parameters were compared between patients who did and those who did not develop CKD. Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviation and categorical variables as numbers (percentages). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyse the normality of the data distribution. Non-normally distributed data are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). We used Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, in univariate analyses. Variables with p-values <0.05 by the Wald test in the univariate analyses were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for CKD. The multivariate analysis results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered to indicate significance.

Results

Demographic characteristics

During a 10-year period, 56 patients were diagnosed with GUTB, of whom 11 (19.6%) developed CKD after treatment for GUTB (Fig. 1). The mean age of these patients was 52.8 years, and 24 (42.9%) patients had a history of TB, most frequently pulmonary TB (21/24). Three patients were taking immunosuppressants, and two had a history of gastrectomy. No patient had HIV or multi-drug resistant TB. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain (42.9%), and gross haematuria was present in 33% of the patients (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in this study. GUTB genitourinary tuberculosis, EMR electronic medical record

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of both groups according to kidney function in patients with GUTB

Variables Normal kidney function group (n = 45) CKD group (n = 11) Total (n = 56) p
Age 50.1 ± 15.1 63.9 ± 18.5 52.8 ± 16.6 0.012
Old age (≥65 years) 6 (13.3) 5 (45.5) 11 (19.6) 0.029
Sex (male) 20 (44.4) 6 (54.5) 26 (46.4) 0.609
BMI (kg/m2) 22.8 ± 3.4 21.9 ± 5.2 22.6 ± 3.8 0.589
Previous TB history
 Lung 16 (35.6) 5 (45.5) 21 (37.5) 0.730
 Bone 2 (4.4) 1 (9.1) 3 (5.4) 0.488
 Intestine 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) 1.000
Co-morbidity conditions
 Immune-compromised patients 8 (17.8) 4 (36.4) 12 (21.4) 0.224
 Cardiovascular disease 11 (24.4) 5 (45.5) 16 (28.6) 0.312
 DM 1 (2.2) 2 (18.2) 3 (5.4) 0.174
 Liver disease 3 (6.7) 1 (9.1) 4 (7.1) 1.000
 Pulmonary disease 4 (8.9) 2 (18.2) 6 (10.7) 0.727
 History of gastrectomy 2 (4.4) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.6) 1.000
Involving location
 Urinary system
  Kidney or ureter 30 (66.7) 9 (81.8) 39 (69.6) 0.539
  Bladder 11 (24.4) 5 (45.5) 16 (28.6) 0.312
 Genital system
  Epididymis or testis 11 (24.4) 2 (18.2) 13 (23.2) 0.966
  Prostate 4 (8.9) 0 (0.0) 4 (7.1) 0.709
  Uterus or fallopian tubes 4 (8.9) 1 (9.1) 5 (8.9) 1.000
  Both affected urinary and genital tract 2 (4.4) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.6) 1.000
  Concurrent extra-urogenital lesion 1 (2.2) 1 (9.1) 2 (3.6) 0.132
Clinical features
 Nonspecific symptomsa 5 (11.1) 2 (18.2) 7 (12.5) 0.614
 Urinary symptomsb 22 (48.9) 9 (81.8) 31 (55.4) 0.088
 Gross hematuria 14 (31.1) 5 (45.5) 19 (33.9) 0.481
 Loin/abdominal pain 18 (40.0) 6 (54.5) 24 (42.9) 0.501
 Scrotal pain/mass 11 (24.4) 0 (0.0) 11 (19.6) 0.098
 Abscess or fistula 2 (4.4) 1 (9.1) 3 (5.4) 0.488
 Vaginal bleeding 2 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.6) 1.000
 Asymptomatic patients 4 (8.9) 0 (0.0) 4 (7.1) 0.575

Bold values indicate statistically significant differences

Data were presented as mean ± SD, number (percentage) or median (IQR)

GUTB genitourinary tuberculosis, CKD chornic kidney disease, BMI body mass index, TB tuberculosis, DM diabetes mellitus, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range

aFever; anorexia/weight loss; sweating; weakness; peripheral lymphadenopathy

bUrinary frequency or dysuria; urethral pain; irritable voiding symptoms

The diagnosis was confirmed most frequently by histopathology (30/56, 53.6%). Urine AFB staining was positive in six of the 56 patients (10.7%). A TB interferon-gamma evaluation was performed in 5/56 patients, all of whom showed a positive result.

Almost all of the patients (53/56, 94.6%) underwent a 6- or 9-month course of chemotherapy with isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol with or without pyrazinamide; the median treatment duration was 9 months. In addition, 42 of the 56 patients (75.0%) underwent surgical treatment. All surgical techniques included all ablative surgery and reconstructive surgery from the time of diagnosis to completion of medical treatment. During an average 40-month observation period, CKD developed in 11 (19.6%) and ESRD in 4 (7.1%) of the patients. Of the patients, 26.8% required additional surgical treatment after completion of medical TB treatment, and recurrence was observed in 4 (7.1%) patients. The all-cause mortality rate was 7.1% (4/56).

Risk factors for CKD

CKD occurred in 11 (19.6%) patients during the follow-up period. In univariate analyses, patients with CKD were older (50.1 ± 15.1 vs. 63.9 ± 18.5 years; p = 0.012) and had higher creatinine levels at the time of diagnosis (0.9 [IQR 0.8–1.0] vs. 1.4 [IQR 1.1–1.8] mg/dL; p = 0.002). ARF occurred in 10 of the 56 patients (17.9%), of whom three recovered and seven progressed to CKD due to persistent renal insufficiency.

There were significantly lower rates of microscopic haematuria (42.2% vs. 81.8%; p = 0.019) and proteinuria (13.3% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.029) in the non-CKD group compared with the CKD group in the univariate analyses. There was also a significantly higher rate of positive urine TB PCR results in the CKD group (72.7% vs. 37.8%; p = 0.030) (Table 2). In the CKD group, five patients had both microscopic haematuria and proteinuria, four had only microscopic haematuria, and two patients had neither microscopic haematuria nor proteinuria. Microscopic haematuria and proteinuria were significant (microscopic haematuria, p = 0.019; proteinuria, p = 0.029) in the univariate analyses but not in the multivariate analysis.

Table 2.

Findings of both groups according to kidney function in patients with GUTB

Variables Normal kidney function group (n = 45) CKD group (n = 11) Total (n = 56) p
Diagnosis
 Positivity of urine AFB stain 3/41 (7.3) 3/10 (30.0) 6/51 (11.8) 0.081
 Positivity of urinary TB culture 17/38 (44.7) 7/10 (70.0) 24/48 (50.0) 0.155
 Positivity of urine TB PCR study 17/36 (47.2) 8/9 (88.9) 25/45 (55.6) 0.030
 Histopathologic diagnosis 24 (53.3) 6 (54.5) 30/55 (53.6) 0.741
Laboratory data
 White blood cell (/μl) 6880 (5650–7890) 6520 (5580–8395) 6695 (5580–7915) 0.699
 Hemoglobin (g/dl) 12.5 ± 1.8 11.7 ± 1.7 12.3 ± 1.8 0.174
 Platelet (103/μl) 259.0 ± 80.5 263.2 ± 121.2 259.9 ± 89.1 0.893
 ESR (mm/hr) 46.9 ± 23.8 82.5 ± 53.0 53.4 ± 30.7 0.145
 Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl) 13.9 (10.5–16.9) 17.8 (15.4–27.8) 14.4 (11.6–17.6) 0.006
 Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.002
 eGFR (MDRD) 78.1 ± 16.5 49.4 ± 23.4 75.8 ± 23.5 0.002
 eGFR (MDRD) after 1 year 82.7 ± 16.5 35.1 ± 18.1 72.8 ± 25.6 < 0.001
 Acute renal failure 3 (6.7) 7 (63.6) 10 (17.9) < 0.001
 Glucose (mg/dl) 98.0 (89.0–108.0) 104.0 (99.5–121.5) 100.0 (90.0–112.0) 0.075
 Albumin (g/dl) 4.4 (3.9–4.6) 3.8 (3.5–4.2) 4.3 (3.8–4.5) 0.102
 CRP (mg/dl) 10.2 (3.7–38.2) 45.3 (19.3–65.5) 15.0 (5.0–44.2) 0.090
 Microscopic hematuria 19 (42.2) 9 (81.8) 28 (50.0) 0.019
 Gross hematuria 14 (31.1) 5 (45.5) 19 (33.9) 0.481
 Pyuria 29 (64.4) 8 (72.7) 37 (66.1) 0.732
 Proteinuria 6 (13.3) 5 (45.5) 11 (19.6) 0.029

Bold values indicate statistically significant differences

Data were presented as mean ± SD, number (percentage) or median (IQR). All data are based on the results at the time of diagnosis except for ‘eGFR after 1 year’

GUTB genitourinary tuberculosis, CKD chronic kidney disease, AFB acid-fast bacilli, TB tuberculosis, PCR polymerase chain reaction, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MDRD Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation, CRP c-reactive protein, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range

The sex ratio and BMI did not show significant differences between the two groups. The site of TB infection, previous TB history and comorbidities were not significant independent factors. Treatment modality and duration did not differ significantly between the two groups. Surgical treatment including nephrectomy may be performed during medical treatment, so it does not affect creatinine at the time of diagnosis but may affect CKD development. Of the patients, 15/56 (26.8%) had total or partial nephrectomy; there were no significant differences between the two groups according to kidney function (p = 0.674). But, the rate of ESRD development (0.0% vs. 36.4%; p = 0.001) and the rate of surgical treatment (20.0% vs. 54.5%; p = 0.005) after completion of treatment were significantly higher in the CKD group than in the non-CKD group (Table 3).

Table 3.

Treatment modality and complications of both groups according to kidney function in GUTB patients

Variables Normal kidney function group (n = 45) CKD group (n = 11) Total (n = 56) p
Medical treatment
 TB medication use 42 (93.3) 11 (100.0) 53 (94.6) 0.894
 Medication regimen 1.000
  HER 6 (13.3) 1 (9.1) 7 (12.5)
  HERZ 36 (80.0) 10 (90.9) 46 (82.1)
 Medication durations (m) 9 (6–9) 9 (9–10) 9 (6–10) 0.243
Surgical treatment
 All surgical techniquesa 32 (71.1) 10 (90.9) 42 (75.0) 0.332
 Ablative surgeryb 23 (51.5) 8 (72.7) 31 (55.4) 0.340
 Nephrectomy 11 (24.4) 4 (36.4) 15 (26.8) 0.674
 Reconstructive therapyc 12 (26.7) 3 (27.3) 15 (26.8) 1.000
Follow up durations (m) 38.2 ± 27.8 48.0 ± 47.0 40.5 ± 32.5 0.362
Complications
 Hydronephrosis 9 (20.0) 3 (27.3) 12 (21.4) 0.038
 Bladder contraction 3 (6.7) 2 (18.2) 5 (8.9) 0.021
 Renal calcification 10 (22.2) 3 (27.3) 13 (23.2) 0.044
 Additional surgical treatmentd 9 (20.0) 6 (54.5) 15 (26.8) 0.005
 Recurrence 3 (6.7) 1 (9.1) 4 (7.1) 0.056
 All cause mortality 2 (4.4) 2 (18.2) 4 (7.1) 0.132
 ESRD development 0 (0.0) 4 (36.4) 4 (7.1) 0.001

Bold values indicate statistically significant differences

Data were presented as mean ± SD, number (percentage) or median (IQR)

GUTB genitourinary tuberculosis, CKD chronic kidney disease, TB tuberculosis, HER isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol, HERZ isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, with pyrazinamide, ESRD end-stage renal disease, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range

aAll surgical techniques included all ablative surgery and reconstructive surgery from the time of diagnosis to completion of medical treatment

bAblative surgery is associated with partial or total nephrectomy, nephro-ureterectomy, cystectomy, epididymectomy, semicastration, salpingectomy, as well as other procedures

cReconstructive therapy is considered for: ureteric or urethral stricture repair; stent placement, replacement, or reimplantation; resection; urinary diversion; and bladder augmentation cystoplasty

dAny surgical treatment during follow up after completed medical treatment

In the multivariate analysis, ARF (OR, 54.305; 95% CI, 1.517–1944.002; p = 0.032) and old age (OR, 54.255; 95% CI, 1.523–1932.905; p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multivariable analysis of risk factors associated chronic kidney disease in GUTB patients

Variables Univariate analysis p Multivariable analysis p
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Old age (≥65 years) 5.42 (1.25–23.45) 0.029 54.26 (1.52–1932.91) 0.028
Acute renal failure 24.50 (4.49–133.76) < 0.001 54.31 (1.52–1944.00) 0.032
Positivity of urine TB PCR study 8.94 (1.01–79.05) 0.030 5.56 (0.19–162.56) 0.320
Microscopic hematuria 6.16 (1.19–31.82) 0.019 13.78 (0.61–313.93) 0.100
Proteinuria 5.42 (1.25–23.45) 0.029 0.30 (0.01–12.85) 0.533

Bold values indicate statistically significant differences

GUTB genitourinary tuberculosis, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, TB tuberculosis, PCR polymerase chain reaction

Discussion

In this study, we report a high incidence of CKD after treatment in patients whose renal function was normal before the diagnosis of GUTB. Additionally, ARF and old age were independent risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients. This finding suggests that regular follow-up of renal function is needed during and after completion of treatment in elderly GUTB patients with an elevated creatinine level at the time of diagnosis.

CKD is a major global health issue and is ranked 17th in terms of disability-adjusted life years in the US [13]. The overall prevalence of CKD among the general population is 13.1% in the US and 10.8% in China [14, 15]. In Korea, the prevalence of CKD among adults aged >20 years was 8.2%, and that among urban civilians aged >35 years was 13.7% [16, 17]. In our study, the prevalence of CKD in GUTB patients was 19.6%, higher than that in the general population. Likewise, a 19.0% prevalence of renal function deterioration in GUTB patients was reported previously [10]. In our study, ESRD occurred in 7.1% of GUTB patients. According to a review of 8961 cases, GUTB led to ESRD in 5.7% of patients [5]; that prior study involved patients aged 40–45 years, whereas our patients were older (mean, 52.8 ± 16.6 years), which may explain the higher incidence of ESRD [5, 18].

In this study, old age was an important risk factor for CKD in GUTB patients. The eGFR decreases in parallel with age [19]. Renal aging is a multifactorial process associated with anatomical and functional changes that accumulate over a lifetime [20]. Exposure to chronic inflammation, such as that induced by TB, likely enhances oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, which are related to renal aging. In addition, the renal-aging-induced reduction in kidney repair ability and tubular and glomerular changes aggravate the decrease in eGFR [20]. Elderly patients with GUTB require close monitoring for early detection of CKD.

A high creatinine level at the time of diagnosis reflects the progression of GUTB and destruction of the kidney structure. After treatment, recovery of a destroyed kidney is difficult. M. tuberculosis spreads from the kidney to the bladder, causing granulomatous lesions associated with fibrosis. In the kidney, M. tuberculosis forms granulomas in the medullary region and can subsequently disseminate and destroy the renal parenchyma. Papillary necrosis eventually invades the collecting system, leading to fibrosis and obstructive uropathy [21, 22]. Throughout the disease course, papillary necrosis, tubular injury and obstructive uropathy can lead to CKD. In our study, ARF was significantly predictive of CKD and may be related to disease severity at the time of diagnosis. The 10 patients with ARF underwent ablative surgery or reconstruction because of direct infection of the kidney parenchyma and/or ureteral obstruction. Moreover, 10 of the 11 patients in whom CKD developed underwent ablative surgery or reconstruction because of direct infection of the kidney parenchyma and/or ureteral obstruction. Therefore, CKD can be caused by direct infection of the kidney parenchyma or ureteral obstruction with resultant hydronephrosis.

In South Korea, GUTB comprises 3% of EPTB cases. However, GUTB reportedly accounts for 27% (range, 14–41%) of EPTB cases in the US, Canada and United Kingdom [4]. This difference may be due to the low prevalence (<1%) of HIV infection in South Korea. In addition, South Korea has a higher incidence of TB than those of other countries and a high income level, but an intermediate incidence of TB. Thus, further research is needed.

There was no significant difference in the incidence of drug-related side effects, treatment duration or drug regimens between the two groups; thus, such drugs likely did not affect kidney function to an appreciable degree. In univariate analyses, urine TB positivity detected by PCR was associated with CKD. We presumed that the results of this test reflect disease severity and the amount of excretory bacilluria. Delayed diagnosis could aggravate destruction of the GU system, leading to CKD [10, 23]. Therefore, a more sensitive diagnostic method is needed. The diagnosis was confirmed most frequently by histopathology, but urine AFB staining for M. tuberculosis was the first-choice diagnostic method in almost all of the patients. Similar to previous reports, the sensitivity of urine AFB testing was very low [21, 23].

Of the patients, 75.0% underwent surgery, similar to previous reports [5, 18]. Furthermore, the CKD group had a significantly higher incidence of additional surgical procedures and ESRD during follow up. Therefore, prevention of CKD development would reduce the need for unnecessary surgical procedures and dialysis. This will require considerable efforts to ensure early diagnosis of GUTB, including the development of a highly sensitive diagnostic tool and active testing of patients.

This study had several limitations. The first was its retrospective design. Second, some patients were lost to follow up, and some had been diagnosed and started treatment at another hospital and were subsequently transferred to our hospital. Third, 14 patients (20%) were excluded because of insufficient information. Fourth, proteinuria was detected by the dipstick test, which is not quantitative. Fifth, the single-centre design and small sample size may limit the generalisability of our findings to the overall population. However, previous literature reviews comprise mainly case reports or hypothesised that CKD is related to GUTB. Thus, this study is the first to analyse the risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients.

Conclusions

ARF and old age are independent risk factors for CKD in GUTB patients. Therefore, in elderly GUTB patients with an elevated creatinine level at the time of diagnosis, regular follow-up of renal function should be performed during and after treatment.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2017R1C1B5017875). This study was also supported by a faculty research grant from University College of Medicine (6-2017-0054). The fund provided data collection, statistical analysis and English proofing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AFB

Acid-fast bacilli

ARF

Acute renal failure

BMI

Body mass index

CI

Confidence interval

CKD

Chronic kidney disease

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

EPTB

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis

ESRD

End-stage renal disease

GU

Genitourinary

GUTB

Genitourinary tuberculosis

HIV

Human immunodeficiency virus

IQR

Interquartile range

KDIGO

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes

M. tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

MDRD

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation

OR

Odds ratio

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

TB

Tuberculosis

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design of study: EJK, NSK and YHC. Acquisition of data: EJK, WJL, WYJ, HC and IYJ. Data analysis and interpretation: EJK, NSK and YHC. Drafting of manuscript and critical revision: EJK, JYA, SJJ, NSK, JYC, YHC, YGS, JMK. Approval of final version of manusciript: EJK, WJL, WYJ, HC, IYJ, JYA, SJJ, NSK, JYC, YHC, YGS, and JMK.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System Clinical Trial Center. The requirement for informed consent was waived because this was a retrospective study involving a review of electronic medical records.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Eun Jin Kim, Email: stone0128@yuhs.ac.

Woonji Lee, Email: leewj86@yuhs.ac.

Woo Yong Jeong, Email: jwym777@yuhs.ac.

Hen Choi, Email: bh138@yuhs.ac.

In Young Jung, Email: exquisite19@yuhs.ac.

Jin Young Ahn, Email: comebacktosea@yuhs.ac.

Su Jin Jeong, Email: jsj@yuhs.ac.

Nam Su Ku, Phone: +82-2-2228-2277, Email: smileboy9@yuhs.ac.

Jun Yong Choi, Email: seran@yuhs.ac.

Young Hwa Choi, Phone: +82-31-219-5112, Email: yhwa1805@ajou.ac.kr.

Young Goo Song, Email: imfell@yuhs.ac.

June Myung Kim, Email: jmkim@yuhs.ac.

References

  • 1.Mitchell BG, Ferguson JK, Anderson M, Sear J, Barnett A. Length of stay and mortality associated with healthcare-associated urinary tract infections: a multi-state model. J Hosp Infect. 2016;93:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Selik RM, Byers RH, Jr, Dworkin MS. Trends in diseases reported on U.S. death certificates that mentioned HIV infection, 1987-1999. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29:378–387. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200204010-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Allen-Bridson K, Gross C, Malpiedi PJ, Peterson KD, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2013, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:206–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abbara A, Davidson RN. Etiology and management of genitourinary tuberculosis. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:678–688. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM. Urogenital tuberculosis: update and review of 8961 cases from the world literature. Rev Urol. 2008;10:207–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gupta S, Santhosh R, Meitei KS, Singh SR. Primary genito-urinary tuberculosis with bilateral urolithiasis and renal failure-an unusual case. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:927–929. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5570.2979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stunell H, Buckley O, Feeney J, Geoghegan T, Browne RF, Torreggiani WC. Imaging of acute pyelonephritis in the adult. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1820–1828. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0366-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.ESRD Registry Committee, Korean Society of Nephrology. Current renal replacement thrapy in Korea - Insan memorial Dialysis registry, 2015: Korean Society of Nephrology; 2016. http://www.ksn.or.kr/rang_board/list.html?code=sinchart
  • 9.Kapoor R, Ansari MS, Mandhani A, Gulia A. Clinical presentation and diagnostic approach in cases of genitourinary tuberculosis. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:401–405. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.42626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altiparmak MR, Trabulus S, Balkan II, Yalin SF, Denizli N, Aslan G, et al. Urinary tuberculosis: a cohort of 79 adult cases. Ren Fail. 2015;37:1157–1163. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1057460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Locatelli F, Nissenson AR, Barrett BJ, Walker RG, Wheeler DC, Eckardt KU, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for anemia in chronic kidney disease: problems and solutions. A position statement from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Kidney Int. 2008;74:1237–1240. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:448–457. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1201534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298:2038–2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, Wang W, Liu B, Liu J, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2012;379:815–822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim S, Lim CS, Han DC, Kim GS, Chin HJ, Kim SJ, et al. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the associated factors to CKD in urban Korea: a population-based cross-sectional epidemiologic study. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(Suppl):S11–S21. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.S1.S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park JI, Baek H, Jung HH. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Korea: the Korean National Health and nutritional examination survey 2011-2013. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:915–923. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee JY, Park HY, Park SY, Lee SW, Moon HS, Kim YT, et al. Clinical characteristics of genitourinary tuberculosis during a recent 10-year period in one center. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:200–205. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tonelli M, Riella MC. World kidney day 2014: CKD and the aging population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:349–353. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bolignano D, Mattace-Raso F, Sijbrands EJ, Zoccali C. The aging kidney revisited: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2014;14:65–80. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Daher Ede F, da Silva GB, Jr, Barros EJ. Renal tuberculosis in the modern era. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:54–64. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2013.12-0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Srougi M. Urogenital tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0015-2016. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Wang J, Fan S, Xiao J, Liang CZ. Renal tuberculosis tends to be low symptoms: how to improve the diagnosis and treatment of renal tuberculosis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:145–146. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.150839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Nephrology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES