SYNOPSIS
Amino acids are an alternate energy source to glucose and amino acid metabolism is upregulated in multiple malignancies, including breast cancers. Multiple amino acid radiotracers have been utilized to image breast cancer with unique strengths and weaknesses. 11C-Methionine uptake correlates with S phase fraction in breast cancer and may be useful for evaluation of treatment response. Invasive lobular breast cancers may demonstrate greater 18F-fluciclovine avidity than 18F-FDG avidity. Thus, different histologic subtypes of breast cancer may utilize diverse metabolic pathways and may be better imaged by different tracers.
Keywords: Breast Cancer, PET/CT, Amino Acid, Methionine, Fluciclovine
Introduction
Cellular metabolism has been a major target of nuclear imaging, with the glucose analog 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) serving as the prototype metabolic imaging radiotracer. This successful 18F-FDG paradigm has focused on the increased metabolism of glucose in malignancy.1 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) has led to important advances in the care of patients with breast cancer (Cite articles earlier in this issue of PET CLINICS by Basu et al, Hildebrandt et al, and Groheux et al.) However, 18F-FDG has multiple limitations, including difficulty distinguishing malignant from benign primary breast lesions,2 limited utility in the evaluation of the breast and axilla compared to other imaging methods,3–5 and variable sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer lesions depending on tumor and patient characteristics.6–10 In particular, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a histologic subtype of breast cancer with lower FDG avidity than the more common ductal breast cancer (IDC) in both primary and metastatic lesions.11–14 Therefore, multiple opportunities remain for novel metabolic imaging agents in breast malignancies.
While glucose metabolism is recognized as a key metabolic pathway for imaging, less well known to imaging specialists are the multiple other intermediary metabolic pathways of cellular metabolism.15 In addition to glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism are also altered during neoplasia.15 This can be demonstrated at the genomic level, as well as at the level of messenger ribosomal nucleic acid transcription, protein expression, and metabolic phenotypes.16 Exploiting these metabolic pathways for imaging malignancy has been a focus of research over the last two decades. In particular, multiple radiotracers have been designed and tested for imaging of amino acid metabolism with initial successes and potential future opportunities.
This review focuses on basic amino acid metabolism, the radiotracers that have thus far been central to amino acid metabolism imaging in patients with breast cancer, and possibilities for future development of these agents.
Basics of Amino Acid Metabolism in Normal Cells and Malignancy
Although hundreds of amino acids have been described, 20 are encoded in the human genome and serve as the basic building blocks for proteins.16 These amino acids are the components of multiple metabolic pathways that are essential for cellular maintenance. Amino acids are transported into the interior of the cell by amino acid transporters in the cell membrane. There are more than 20 amino acid transporter families, including the major amino acid transport systems L, ASC, and A.
Increased levels of methionine, glutamine, cystine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and other amino acids have been noted in many malignancies, including breast cancers.16–20 Cancer cells with upregulation of amino acid metabolism stimulate increased transport of amino acids into the cell.16,21 The increased consumption of amino acids and overexpression of amino acid transporters in malignancies make radiolabeled amino acids attractive oncologic imaging agents.22
Multiple amino acid transporter families have been demonstrated to be upregulated in breast cancer cells, including LAT1, ASCT2, ATB0,+ SNAT1, and xc−.18,23–27 The L-type amino acid transporter (LAT1) is essential for the transport of large neutral amino acids,21 and is overexpressed in multiple malignant tumor types, including breast cancer.21,24 Furuya and colleagues have described LAT1 transporter expression with CD98 to be an independent prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer.28 The alanine-serine-cysteine family transporter 2 (ASCT2) and system A component SNAT1 have been shown to be upregulated in a tissue microarray of 702 breast malignancies.26,27 Expression of ASCT2 also has prognostic associations in breast cancer.29 The system xc− transporter, which mediates cystine uptake, is upregulated in some breast cancer tumors, as demonstrated by the PET radiotracer (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate.18
Methionine imaging
11C-methionine was an early agent for amino acid metabolic imaging. Methionine is a natural large neutral amino acid that is readily radiolabeled with 11C. 11C-methionine serves as a metabolic marker for methionine uptake by L-type amino acid transporters. Initial work has demonstrated that both primary and metastatic sites of breast malignancy are visualized by 11C-methionine PET.17 In addition, 11C-methionine uptake correlated with the fraction of cells in mitosis in these lesions, suggesting that amino acid uptake may correlate with proliferation rate in breast malignancies.
Subsequent work with 11C-methionine extended to imaging of breast cancer treatment response.30–32 Uptake of 11C-methionine decreased in patients before clinical objective response or regression of tumor size, and provided early evidence that radionuclide metabolic imaging could predict treatment response earlier than other methods. 11C-methionine could distinguish responders from non-responders of endocrine or combination endocrine and chemotherapy after as little as one cycle of treatment.30,32 In some cases, 11C-methionine even outperformed 18F-FDG.31 These studies included only a small number of patients—51 patients among the four studies17,30–32—limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from the data.
Physiologic sites of uptake of 11C-methionine include the liver and bone marrow, which could limit evaluation of breast cancer metastases. Other limitations of 11C-methionine include its relatively short (20-minute) half-life and non-protein metabolites, which may interfere with imaging. More recently, 99m-technetium-labeled methionine has been developed and utilized with dedicated breast scintigraphy equipment for the detection of primary breast malignancies.33 This radiotracer, 99mTc-DTPA-bis-methionine, could be produced with high efficiency from a single vial kit, and has demonstrated high sensitivity in the initial clinical trial.33
18F-Fluciclovine
18F-fluciclovine (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a synthetic amino acid initially developed at Emory University as a leucine analog for imaging brain malignancies,34 and subsequently developed as a valuable radiotracer for prostate malignancies.35,36 In 2016, 18F-fluciclovine was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for PET imaging of patients with suspected prostate cancer recurrence based on elevated PSA levels following prior treatment.
18F-fluciclovine is transported into the cell primarily by the ASCT2 transporter with additional involvement of LAT1 in certain conditions such as dense acidic tumor environments.37,38 Uptake into cells is most similar to that of the naturally occurring amino acid glutamine.38,39 Preclinical work has demonstrated uptake of fluciclovine into breast cancer cell lines and mouse orthotopic tumor xenografts.21 A recent preliminary in vitro study reported that fluciclovine uptake into breast cancer cells occurred mostly via ASCT2 transporters.40 As amino acid transporters, including ASC-type transporters,26 are upregulated in breast cancer cells, investigators have extended clinical trials with 18F-fluciclovine to patients with breast lesions and breast cancer.41–43
In a study of 12 women, 18F-fluciclovine uptake in malignant breast lesions was more than four-fold greater than in benign lesions.42 The greatest uptake of 18F-fluciclovine was found in the highest-grade malignancies. In another study of 27 women with breast cancer, the primary breast malignancy was visualized in all patients and in 20 of 21 pathologically confirmed axillary nodal metastases.41 In addition, 18F-fluciclovine detected histologically confirmed extra-axillary nodal metastases that were previously undetected. Both of these studies identified an interesting correlation between 18F-fluciclovine avidity and histologic subtypes of breast malignancy. While IDC demonstrated equal or inferior fluciclovine avidity compared to FDG avidity, the ILC histology tumors demonstrated greater fluciclovine avidity than FDG avidity41,42 (Fig. 1). This suggests a varying dependence of metabolic pathways between histologic subtypes of breast cancer, raising an interesting question: Could radiotracers targeting different metabolic pathways be suited for imaging specific breast cancer histologic subtypes?
Figure 1.
Greater 18F-fluciclovine avidity than 18F-FDG avidity in a patient with a right breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). (A) Coronal CT, PET, and fused PET/CT images from a 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT demonstrate a 18F-fluciclovine-avid right breast ILC (arrow, SUV 7.1). (B) Coronal CT, PET, and fused PET/CT images from a 18F-FDG PET/CT on the same patient demonstrate lower FDG avidity (arrow, SUV 3.5).
Adapted from Tade FI, Cohen MA, Styblo TM, et al. Anti-3-18F-FACBC (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/CT of Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Study.
J Nucl Med. 2016 Sep;57(9):1357-63. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171389. Epub 2016 Apr 7; with permission.
A separate study evaluated the ability of 18F-fluciclovine avidity to determine neoadjuvant therapy response, utilizing histology following definitive surgical management as the gold standard.43 Changes in 18F-fluciclovine avidity strongly correlated with the percentage of reduction of tumor seen on pathology (Fig. 2). Although as reported with 18F-FDG, histologic complete response could not be accurately distinguished from non-complete responses, since small volume residual malignancy in patients with >90% tumor reduction on histology could not be readily appreciated by 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (Fig. 3).
Figure 2.
Reduction in 18F-fluciclovine avidity following neoadjuvant therapy in a 52-year-old woman with breast cancer. (A) Axial PET, CT, and fused images from a 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT at baseline demonstrate the 18F-fluciclovine-avid primary breast mass (arrow) and 18F-fluciclovine-avid axillary nodal metastases (dashed arrows). (B) Axial PET, CT, and fused PET/CT images from a 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT following neoadjuvant therapy demonstrate decreased 18F-fluciclovine avidity of all lesions to background. On pathology, there was a complete pathologic response, with no residual tumor.
Adapted Ulaner GA, Goldman DA, Corben A, et al. Prospective clinical trial of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for determining the response to neoadjuvant therapy in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(7):1037-1042; with permission.
Figure 3.
Scatterplot demonstrating a strong correlation between 18F-fluciclovine SUV and percent tumor volume reduction on pathology in 24 patients with breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. Note that a 100% reduction in SUV on PET correlated with a 90-100% reduction in tumor reduction. Thus, while the correlation was strong, a 100% reduction in 18F-fluciclovine SUV could not distinguish a pathologic complete response from a pathologic non-complete response. ρ = Spearman’s rho.
Adapted from Ulaner GA, Goldman DA, Corben A, et al. Prospective clinical trial of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for determining the response to neoadjuvant therapy in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(7):1037-1042; with permission.
These initial studies emphasized 18F-fluciclovine avidity in local disease, with only one distal (osseous) metastasis visualized. Of importance will be future trials evaluating 18F-fluciclovine avidity in patients with distant metastatic disease, where the advantages of whole body metabolic imaging will likely be greatest. Preclinical studies have demonstrated substantial success of 18F-fluciclovine in the detection of osseous metastases.44,45 Physiologic fluciclovine avidity is seen in the liver, pancreas, and skeletal muscle. The physiologic avidity in the liver will likely limit detection of hepatic metastases, a common site of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. In fact, in one of the trials, hepatic breast metastases were relatively photopenic to background liver.42
However, breast malignancies with ILC histology have a propensity to metastasize to nodes and bone, where 18F-fluciclovine background is lower, as well as a greater propensity to metastasize to the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts than IDC, where background avidity with 18F-FDG is more problematic. A direct comparison of 18F-fluciclovine and FDG for metastatic ILC could provide evidence of where 18F-fluciclovine may improve staging in ILC.
Given that amino acid transporters mediate both uptake and efflux of amino acids in cells, and 18F-fluciclovine is not intracellularly metabolized and trapped like 18F-FDG, the dynamics of 18F-fluciclovine uptake are different than 18F-FDG. While longer uptake times tend to increase 18F-FDG uptake, 18F-fluciclovine uptake peaks within the first 20 minutes and then often demonstrates slow washout from breast tumors.41,42 This phenomenon makes proper protocoling of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT studies of great importance, with radiotracer administration followed by imaging when the patient is already positioned on the PET/CT scanner.
Cysteine transporter imaging
The amino acid transporter system xc− mediates cellular uptake of cystine with concurrent efflux of glutamate. Amino acid analog radiotracers have been designed to examine xc− activity and provide PET/CT imaging of tumors. (4S)-4-(3-(18F)fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) is one such novel amino acid analog radiotracer that has demonstrated tumor visualization in small animal models46 and in patients with lung and breast cancer,18 although uptake in breast cancer lesions was lower and not appreciated in all breast tumors. Histologic or molecular subtypes of breast cancer may influence xc− activity and 18F-FSPG uptake. SUV of 18F-FSPG on PET/CT correlated significantly with extent of immunohistochemical staining for xc− transporter on pathology.18 More recent preclinical studies of a cystine/glutamate analog, 18F-fluoroaminosuberic acid,47 demonstrated tumor uptake in multiple breast cancer cell lines and breast cancer tumor-bearing mice48 and may soon be seen in clinical trials.
Other amino acid analogs for imaging
Multiple radiolabeled tyrosine analogs have been developed for tumor imaging, including L-[1-11C]tyrosine.20 L-[1-11C]tyrosine successfully demonstrated uptake in breast malignancies and had lower uptake than 18F-FDG in a limited number of benign lesions.20 99mTc-labeled tyrosine analogs have also been synthesized with high yield and distinguish breast malignancies from benign breast tissues.49,50 Propanoic acid amino acid analogs, primarily dependent on system A transport, have been developed by the same group at Emory that synthesized 18F-fluciclovine.51 In preclinical studies, multiple propanoic acid derivatives demonstrated good tumor uptake in human-derived breast cancer cells, as well as in mouse tumor xenografts.51
Tryptophan analogs, primarily utilizing L-type amino acid transport, have been developed by multiple research groups, and have also demonstrated uptake in breast cancer cells and in small animal studies.19,52 Recently, a newer leucine analog, 5-[18F]fluoroleucine, was synthesized, with primary transport via LAT1.53 Both cell lines and breast cancer xenografts demonstrate 5-[18F]fluoroleucine uptake. As opposed to 18F-fluciclovine, 5-[18F]fluoroleucine uptake progressively increases over time.53 The glutaminolysis pathway is highly active in many malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancers.54 Preclinical work with the glutamine analog [18F](2S,4R)4-Fluoroglutamine55,56 has demonstrated the ability of this tracer to track changes in the cellular glutamine pool size and the glutaminolysis pathway following glutaminase inhibition.54
Future applications
There is substantial interest in the synthesis of novel amino acid metabolic radiotracers and the application of promising agents for tumor imaging, with the goal of developing molecular imaging biomarkers that predict the most efficacious therapies or successfully measure response to therapy.57 Visualization of primary breast tumors is usually the first hurdle when promising agents are translating into human studies; however, this is unlikely to be where clinical benefit will be derived. As has been shown with 18F-FDG, whole body PET/CT is not sensitive for the primary breast malignancy when compared to other available imaging modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. Truly remarkable sensitivity of a novel amino acid tracer would be required to supplant these imaging modalities for the primary breast malignancy. Rather, PET/CT has, to date, demonstrated unparalleled utility in the evaluation of distant metastases (and to a lesser extent, extra-axillary nodal metastases) with 18F-FDG as the radiotracer.
The clinical impact of amino acid analog radiotracers could be determined by identifying niches where they outperform 18F-FDG, such as the potential of 18F-fluciclovine in lobular breast cancer. A thorough analysis of 18F-fluciclovine for the detection of unsuspected distant metastases in patients with ILC, as well as its ability to monitor ILC treatment response, seems warranted. Since LAT1- and ASCT2-mediated amino acid transport are involved in mTOR tumor signaling, therapy directed against this pathway could potentially be studied with amino acid transport imaging. Another interesting possibility is that, relative to indiscriminate 18F-FDG uptake in inflammation, 18F-fluciclovine is more selectively taken up by T- and B-cells, which could prove useful in imaging of immunomodulatory therapies.58 While the ultimate goal of a highly sensitive and specific radiotracer for breast cancer will likely lie in targeted biomarker imaging directed to the breast cancer cell, metabolic agents such as amino acid analogs are ripe for nearer-term applications in specific scenarios of breast cancer.
Summary
Amino acids are central to multiple metabolic processes in the cell. Amino acid transporters and amino acid metabolism are upregulated in multiple malignancies, including breast cancers. Multiple amino acid analog radiotracers have been utilized to image breast cancer with unique strengths and weaknesses. Early work with 11C-Methionine demonstrated tracer uptake, which correlates with S-phase fraction in breast cancer and may be useful for evaluation of treatment response. Invasive lobular breast cancers may demonstrate greater 18F-fluciclovine avidity than 18F-FDG avidity, and thus evaluation of this tracer at initial ILC staging for the detection of unsuspected distant metastases, as well as for evaluation of treatment response in metastatic ILC, is warranted. There continues to be substantial research into the development and application of novel amino acid radiotracers.
KEY POINTS.
Amino acids are an alternate energy source to glucose and amino acid metabolism is upregulated in multiple malignancies, including breast cancers.
Multiple amino acid radiotracers have been utilized to image breast cancer with unique strengths and weaknesses.
11C-Methionine uptake correlates with S phase fraction in breast cancer and may be useful for evaluation of treatment response.
Invasive lobular breast cancers may demonstrate greater 18F-fluciclovine avidity than 18F-FDG avidity. Thus, different histologic subtypes of breast cancer may utilize diverse metabolic pathways and may be better imaged by different tracers.
Acknowledgments
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Dr Ulaner acknowledges the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Breakthrough Award BC132676 and the MSKCC Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe Core (NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748).
Dr. Schuster acknowledges support from the Glenn Family Breast Cancer Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, and has also participated in Emory University’s Office of Sponsored Projects research supported in part by Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd., and Nihon Medi-Physics Co. Ltd.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Gary A. Ulaner, Associate Member, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, New York, 10065, USA and Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York, 10065, USA.
David M. Schuster, Associate Professor, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Room E152, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
References
- 1.Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, Silverman DH, Coleman RE, Phelps ME. A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(5 Suppl):1S–93S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kang BJ, Lee JH, Yoo Ie R, et al. Clinical significance of incidental finding of focal activity in the breast at 18F-FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(2):341–347. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(3):480–508. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wahl RL, Siegel BA, Coleman RE, Gatsonis CG. Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(2):277–285. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peare R, Staff RT, Heys SD. The use of FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(1):281–290. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0771-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, et al. Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(1):9–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buck A, Schirrmeister H, Kuhn T, et al. FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(10):1317–1323. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-0880-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gourin CG, Williams HT, Seabolt WN, Herdman AV, Howington JW, Terris DJ. Utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in identification of residual nodal disease after chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(5):705–710. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000215176.98582.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heudel P, Cimarelli S, Montella A, Bouteille C, Mognetti T. Value of PET-FDG in primary breast cancer based on histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s10147-010-0120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Riedl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M, et al. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(10):1578–1583. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.143297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Avril N, Rose CA, Schelling M, et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(20):3495–3502. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.20.3495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bos R, van Der Hoeven JJ, van Der Wall E, et al. Biologic correlates of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(2):379–387. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dashevsky BZ, Goldman DA, Parsons M, et al. Appearance of untreated bone metastases from breast cancer on FDG PET/CT: importance of histologic subtype. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(11):1666–1673. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3080-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hogan MP, Goldman DA, Dashevsky B, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(11):1674–1680. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harrelson JP, Lee MW. Expanding the view of breast cancer metabolism: Promising molecular targets and therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;167:60–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haukaas TH, Euceda LR, Giskeodegard GF, Bathen TF. Metabolic portraits of breast cancer by HR MAS MR spectroscopy of intact tissue samples. Metabolites. 2017;7(2) doi: 10.3390/metabo7020018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H. Uptake of 11C-methionine in breast cancer studied by PET. An association with the size of S-phase fraction. Br J Cancer. 1991;64(6):1121–1124. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baek S, Choi CM, Ahn SH, et al. Exploratory clinical trial of (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate for imaging xC− transporter using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung or breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(19):5427–5437. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xin Y, Cai H. Improved radiosynthesis and biological evaluations of L- and D-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-tryptophan for PET imaging of IDO-mediated kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19(4):589–598. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-1024-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kole AC, Nieweg OE, Pruim J, et al. Standardized uptake value and quantification of metabolism for breast cancer imaging with FDG and L-[1-11C]tyrosine PET. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(5):692–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liang Z, Cho HT, Williams L, et al. Potential biomarker of L-type amino acid transporter 1 in breast cancer progression. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45(2):93–102. doi: 10.1007/s13139-010-0068-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jager PL, Plaat BE, de Vries EG, et al. Imaging of soft-tissue tumors using L-3-[iodine-123]iodo-alpha-methyl-tyrosine single photon emission computed tomography: comparison with proliferative and mitotic activity, cellularity, and vascularity. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(6):2252–2259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fuchs BC, Bode BP. Amino acid transporters ASCT2 and LAT1 in cancer: partners in crime? Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(4):254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shennan DB, Thomson J. Inhibition of system L (LAT1/CD98hc) reduces the growth of cultured human breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2008;20(4):885–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karunakaran S, Ramachandran S, Coothankandaswamy V, et al. SLC6A14 (ATB0,+) protein, a highly concentrative and broad specific amino acid transporter, is a novel and effective drug target for treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(36):31830–31838. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.229518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim S, Kim DH, Jung WH, Koo JS. Expression of glutamine metabolism-related proteins according to molecular subtype of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20(3):339–348. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang K, Cao F, Fang W, et al. Activation of SNAT1/SLC38A1 in human breast cancer: correlation with p-Akt overexpression. BMC cancer. 2013;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Furuya M, Horiguchi J, Nakajima H, Kanai Y, Oyama T. Correlation of L-type amino acid transporter 1 and CD98 expression with triple negative breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(2):382–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Geldermalsen M, Wang Q, Nagarajah R, et al. ASCT2/SLC1A5 controls glutamine uptake and tumour growth in triple-negative basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35(24):3201–3208. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huovinen R, Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Ruotsalainen U, Teras M. Carbon-11-methionine and PET in evaluation of treatment response of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993;67(4):787–791. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jansson T, Westlin JE, Ahlstrom H, Lilja A, Langstrom B, Bergh J. Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation? J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(6):1470–1477. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.6.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lindholm P, Lapela M, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Minn H, Jyrkkio S. Preliminary study of carbon-11 methionine PET in the evaluation of early response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2009;30(1):30–36. doi: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e328313b7bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sharma S, Singh B, Mishra AK, et al. LAT-1 based primary breast cancer detection by [99m]Tc-labeled DTPA-bis-methionine scintimammography: first results using indigenously developed single vial kit preparation. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2014;29(7):283–288. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2014.1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shoup TM, Olson J, Hoffman JM, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(2):331–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuster DM, Nanni C, Fanti S. Evaluation of prostate cancer with radiolabeled amino acid analogs. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Suppl 3):61S–66S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Savir-Baruch B, Zanoni L, Schuster DM. Imaging of prostate cancer using fluciclovine. PET Clin. 2017;12(2):145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Okudaira H, Shikano N, Nishii R, et al. Putative transport mechanism and intracellular fate of trans-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in human prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(5):822–829. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Okudaira H, Nakanishi T, Oka S, et al. Kinetic analyses of trans-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid transport in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing human ASCT2 and SNAT2. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40(5):670–675. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oka S, Okudaira H, Ono M, et al. Differences in transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in inflammation, prostate cancer, and glioma cells: comparison with L-[methyl-11C]methionine and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16(3):322–329. doi: 10.1007/s11307-013-0693-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Teoh E, Morotti M, Bridges E, et al. Fluciclovine (18F) is a marker for high-affinity glutamine transporter ASCT2-mediated amino acid transport in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(supplement 1):1028. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ulaner GA, Goldman DA, Gonen M, et al. Initial results of a prospective clinical trial of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in newly diagnosed invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(9):1350–1356. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tade FI, Cohen MA, Styblo TM, et al. Anti-3-18F-FACBC (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/CT of breast cancer: an exploratory study. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(9):1357–1363. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ulaner GA, Goldman DA, Corben A, et al. Prospective clinical trial of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for determining the response to neoadjuvant therapy in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(7):1037–1042. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oka S, Kanagawa M, Doi Y, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Yoshimura H. PET tracer 18F-fluciclovine can detect histologically proven bone metastatic lesions: a preclinical study in rat osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastasis models. Theranostics. 2017;7(7):2048–2064. doi: 10.7150/thno.19883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Oka S, Kanagawa M, Doi Y, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Yoshimura H. Fasting enhances the contrast of bone metastatic lesions in 18F-fluciclovine-PET: preclinical study using a rat model of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic bone metastases. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(5) doi: 10.3390/ijms18050934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Koglin N, Mueller A, Berndt M, et al. Specific PET imaging of xC− transporter activity using a (1)(8)F-labeled glutamate derivative reveals a dominant pathway in tumor metabolism. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(18):6000–6011. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Webster JM, Morton CA, Johnson BF, et al. Functional imaging of oxidative stress with a novel PET imaging agent, 18F-5-fluoro-L-aminosuberic acid. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(4):657–664. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.126664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang H, Jenni S, Colovic M, et al. 18F-5-fluoroaminosuberic acid as a potential tracer to gauge oxidative stress in breast cancer models. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(3):367–373. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kong FL, Ali MS, Zhang Y, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of amino acid-based radiotracer 99mTc-N4-AMT for breast cancer imaging. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:276907. doi: 10.1155/2011/276907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kong FL, Ali MS, Rollo A, et al. Development of tyrosine-based radiotracer 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine for breast cancer imaging. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:671708. doi: 10.1155/2012/671708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yu W, McConathy J, Olson JJ, Goodman MM. System a amino acid transport-targeted brain and systemic tumor PET imaging agents 2-amino-3-[(18)F]fluoro-2-methylpropanoic acid and 3-[(18)F]fluoro-2-methyl-2-(methylamino)propanoic acid. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42(1):8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Michelhaugh SK, Muzik O, Guastella AR, et al. Assessment of tryptophan uptake and kinetics using 1-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tryptophan and alpha-11C-methyl-l-tryptophan PET imaging in mice implanted with patient-derived brain tumor xenografts. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(2):208–213. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chin BB, McDougald D, Weitzel DH, et al. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of 5-[18F]fluoroleucine. Curr Radiopharm. 2017;10(1):41–50. doi: 10.2174/1874471009666161230114954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhou R, Pantel AR, Li S, et al. [18F](2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine PET detects glutamine pool size changes in triple-negative breast cancer in response to glutaminase inhibition. Cancer Res. 2017;77(6):1476–1484. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Qu W, Zha Z, Ploessl K, et al. Synthesis of optically pure 4-fluoro-glutamines as potential metabolic imaging agents for tumors. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(4):1122–1133. doi: 10.1021/ja109203d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lieberman BP, Ploessl K, Wang L, et al. PET imaging of glutaminolysis in tumors by 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(12):1947–1955. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ulaner GA, Riedl CC, Dickler MN, Jhaveri K, Pandit-Taskar N, Weber W. Molecular imaging of biomarkers in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Suppl 1):53S–59S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Teoh EJ, Tsakok MT, Bradley KM, Hyde K, Subesinghe M, Gleeson FV. Recurrent malignant melanoma detected on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging for prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(10):803–804. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]