Diversity and Applications of Endophytic Actinobacteria of Plants in Special and Other Ecological Niches

Abstract

Actinobacteria are wide spread in nature and represent the largest taxonomic group within the domain Bacteria. They are abundant in soil and have been extensively explored for their therapeutic applications. This versatile group of bacteria has adapted to diverse ecological habitats, which has drawn considerable attention of the scientific community in recent times as it has opened up new possibilities for novel metabolites that may help in solving some of the most challenging problems of the day, for example, novel drugs for drug-resistant human pathogens, affordable means to maintain ecological balance in various habitats, and alternative practices for sustainable agriculture. Traditionally, free dwelling soil actinobacteria have been the subject of intensive research. Of late, symbiotic actinobacteria residing as endophytes within the plant tissues have generated immense interest as potential source of novel compounds, which may find applications in medicine, agriculture, and environment. In the light of these possibilities, this review focuses on the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from the plants of extreme habitats and specific ecological niches. Furthermore, an attempt has been made to assign chemical class to the compounds obtained from endophytic actinobacteria. Potential therapeutic applications of these compounds and the utility of endophytic actinobacteria in agriculture and environment are discussed.

Introduction

Actinobacteria are Gram-positive bacteria with high G+C content, which are filamentous with substrate and aerial mycelia. They rose to prominence during the hunt for drugs from microbes following the discovery of Penicillin from Penicillium notatum by Alexander Fleming. They are now well established as prolific producers of a wide range of bioactive secondary metabolites such as antibiotics, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, antioxidants, and others having therapeutic significance (Barka et al., 2016). Approximately, 22,000 bioactive secondary metabolites of microbial origin have been reported, of which fifty percent are from actinobacteria only. Approximately 160 antibiotics are being currently used in human therapy and in agriculture (Berdy, 2012). However, this is a small number to meet the ever-growing requirement for such compounds. Therefore, there is an urgent need for further exploration of actinobacteria to expand the repertoire of bioactive molecules. Since only a small part of the bioactive molecules isolated from actinobacteria and their biosynthetic gene clusters are studied, bioprospecting of actinobacteria for bioactive molecules holds a great promise.

In view of the emerging threat to deal with drug resistant pathogens, there is an increasing sense of urgency for discovery and development of new drugs. In order to address this challenge, novel approaches need to be devised for searching new molecules. One of which is “renaissance in antibacterial discovery from actinomycetes” (Baltz, 2008). Search of special ecological niches along with new methods of isolation of novel genera/species of actinobacteria may lead to the identification of new gene clusters, and hence, new products (Xu et al., 2010). Researchers are now focusing on the isolation of actinobacteria from diverse habitats like oceans (Subramani and Aalbersberg, 2013), extreme environments (Tang et al., 2003; Hamedi et al., 2013), inner tissues of plants (Chankhamhaengdecha et al., 2013), animals excreta (Cao et al., 2012), algae, and lichens (González et al., 2005; Yamamura et al., 2011). Hence, it is highly encouraging to explore the actinobacteria inhabiting special niches like extremophilic plants for discovering hitherto unexploited strains.¹,²,³

For centuries plants have been extensively used as the sources of bioactive compounds for therapeutic purposes. In the recent times, plant associated microorganisms have been shown to produce compounds of high therapeutic value (Subbulakshmi et al., 2012). The microorganisms residing inside plant tissues, mostly in symbiotic relationship, may include different groups, for example, fungi and bacteria including actinobacteria (Pimentel et al., 2011; Singh and Dubey, 2015). The endophytes complete their life cycle within the host plants, normally without subjecting them to any disadvantage. Endophytes are ubiquitous in nature and remain in specific association with the host plants, for example, mutualism or antagonism but not parasitism (Nair and Padmavathy, 2014). They play significant roles in enhancing growth of the host plants by producing phytohormones and other growth promoting factors. In turn, they are benefited with nutrients and shelter within the host plant. They also improve the host's tolerance for abiotic and biotic stresses, while offering resistance against insects, pests, and pathogens.

Studies revealed that nearly all the plants harbor endophytes (Strobel and Daisy, 2003). These microbes attain a very special niche in plants by colonizing themselves in stem, root, petioles, leaf segments, inflorescence of weeds, fruit, buds, seeds along with dead, and hollow hyaline cells (Hata and Sone, 2008; Stepniewska and Kuzniar, 2013). However, the colonization of endophytes in different plants is highly variable depending on factors like host specificity, developmental stage of the host, geographical conditions, and the extant microbial diversity (Dudeja and Giri, 2014). Extensive and intensive studies are, however, required to interpret the relationship between the host and the endophytes, and effect of such interactions on the production of bioactive metabolites.

Considering the immense diversity of the flora and widespread plant-microbe associations, the structural and functional diversity among endophytic actinobacteria is expected to be immense. Such diverse group of endophytic actinobacteria could be source of novel biomolecules with myriad of applications. This review highlights the occurrence and diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in the plants from special ecological niches: arid zones, mangrove, and saline ecosystems, and aquatic habitats. Furthermore, chemical and structural diversity of the metabolites reported from endophytic actinobacteria and their potential applications in medicine, agriculture and environment are discussed.

Origin and emerging concepts of endophytes

Majority of the microbes colonizing the plants internally play key roles in plant's fitness and growth. A minor fraction of them may also cause diseases (Andreote et al., 2014). The overall interaction, however, is mutually beneficial (Mendes et al., 2013; Philippot et al., 2013). Thousands of microorganisms can be the inhabitants of a single plant either in the form of epiphytes in the phyllospheric region or as endophytes within tissues of leaves, roots, or stems. Endophytes display extensive diversity (Turner et al., 2013; Andreote et al., 2014).

The presence of microbial cells in the plant tissue was first observed by De Bary (1866), who coined the term endophytes. The study and exploration of these microbes remained ignored for long. De Bary defined endophytes as “any organism that grows within plant tissue.” Subsequently, the definition had been modified as the studies on endophytes progressed. The most appropriate and comprehensive of the definitions states that endophytes include a suite of microorganisms that grow intra or inter-cellularly in the tissues of the plants without causing any harmful effect to them.

The endophytic communities have been categorized into different subgroups, such as “obligate” or “facultative” (Rosenblueth and Martínez-Romero, 2006). Obligate endophytes are the microbes that depend solely on the metabolism of plants for survival, and whose transmission amongst plants take place by the action of various vectors or by vertical transmission (Hardoim et al., 2008). On the other hand, the facultative endophytes spend certain stages of their life cycle independent of the host plant. They are indirectly associated with plants through neighboring soil environment and atmosphere (Abreu-Tarazi et al., 2010). As the studies advanced, more hypotheses appeared about the origin of endophytic organisms. Extensive studies were undertaken to find out the origin of endophytic organisms in different species of plants (Hallmann et al., 1997; Mitter et al., 2013). Microorganisms associated with the rhizosphere and with the seeds were considered to be the major source of endophytes. Studies based on genome organization revealed the specific endophytes-plant interactions in terms of plant specificity, abundance, and mode of transmission (Andreote et al., 2014). However, in order to understand the relationship of endophytes and the host-plants, scientists have thoroughly studied the genome sizes and origins of endophytes and compared with those of bacteria and their lifestyles (Dini-Andreote et al., 2012). Studies revealed that the genome size of endophytic microbes were smaller than those of free leaving microbes. Presence of less number of mobile genetic elements accounted for the smaller size but increased genomes stability. These observations suggested that microbes with smaller and stable genome are more likely to establish endophytic association (Mitter et al., 2013). It has been observed that the association between the endophyte and its host-plant begins at very early stage of the plant development (Hasegawa et al., 2006). With advancement in the research on plant-microbe interactions, the definitions were modified to offer a clearer and comprehensive description of the endophytes.

Endophytic actinobacterial diversity in various ecosystems

Actinobacteria are predominantly free-living microorganisms found in diverse environments. Soil is the most dominant reservoir for actinobacteria and also represnts the zone of most active interaction between the actinobacteria and the root system of plants. On account of such interactions, the roots of plants can be considered to be the richest source of the endophytic actinobacteria. Studies have demonstrated that plant roots influence the soil region in their vicinity through exudates, which significantly impact plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere (Schenk et al., 2012).

Diversity of endophytic actinobacteria had been reviewed by several groups in recent times. Dinesh et al. (2017) had discussed endophytic actinobacteria from terrestrial plants, which included mainly medicinal plants. Nalini and Prakash (2017), Golinska et al. (2015) and Masand et al. (2015) had also reviewed the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in medicinal plants. Qin et al. (2011) discussed biodiversity of endophytic actinobacteria from crop plants, medicinal plants, Chinese cabbage, and plants from tropical rain forests of China. It had been reported that medicinal plants of tropical rain forests were the richest source of novel endophytic actinobacteria (Qin et al., 2009). Evidently, endophytic actinobacteria from medicinal plants and tropical rain forests have drawn considerable attention of the scientific community till date. But such actinobacteria from the plants of some of the fascinating ecological niches, for example, arid zones, high salt zones (mangroves and halophytes), and aquatic ecosystems have not yet been specifically reviewed. An attempt has, therefore, been made to address this gap in the present review, wherein endophytic actinobacteria from the plants of special niches have been considered. The plants growing in the environments that are under abiotic stress have evolved to cope up with such factors like temperature, humidity, drought, high rainfall, soil salinity, nutrition limitations, and others. These plants are evolutionarily adapted to thrive in the environments characterized by a high degree of abiotic stresses. Physiological features like modification in the root and shoot systems, structure of leaves and anatomical changes like structure of cortex, xylem and phloem aid such plants to survive in conditions like drought, water logging, marshy and salinity. These plants are also referred to as extremophiles due to their ability to thrive in these extreme environmental conditions. Altered environmental conditions are likely to induce changes in plant physiology. Also, there is difference in the chemo-attractants or signal compounds as well as a change in nutrient availability (Kandeler et al., 2006; Haase et al., 2007). These alterations cause changes in the activity and the diversity of microbial communities associated with the plants (Drigo et al., 2009).

Ubiquitous occurrence of the endophytic actinobacteria is evident from their discovery from the plants of diverse climates: arid zones, saline habitats, aquatic ecosystems, and other ecological niches. They have been reported to colonize any tissue or organ of the host plant (Dinesh et al., 2017). It has been noted that different tissues and organs of the plant are colonized by different actinobacteria, which might be determined by the host-microbe interaction. Such processes, which seem to confer a level of selectivity, may impact the endophytic actinobacterial diversity (Nimnoi et al., 2010). From the reports available till date, it is evident that endophytic actinobacteria are abundant in roots, occur moderately in the stems, and have been found in least numbers in the leaves (Gangwar et al., 2014). Such a distribution pattern for the endophytic actinobacteria seems rational since the roots have maximum exposure to and interactions with the microbial population in the rhizosphere. The endophytic actinobacteria are broadly considered as Streptomyces spp. and non-Streptomyces spp. The non-Streptomyces spp. are uncommon and are classified as rare taxa.

Similarly, the variation in climatic conditions contributes to greater diversity in their flora and the resident microbial communities. For example, the microbial communities of tropical and temperate regions possess more diverse range of endophytes (Strobel and Daisy, 2003). Studies have revealed that physiological diversity is linked to the geographical diversity of the host plants (Du et al., 2013). Despite the relationship between abundance and diversity of endophytic actinobacteria and plants, no direct correlation among the host plants and their endophytic communities could be established. Actinosynnema, isolated from a grass blade, was the first probable actinobacterium of plant origin (Hasegawa et al., 1978). Afterwards, there have been numerous reports on the isolation of endophytic actinobacteria from various plant sources as discussed in the ensuing sections.

Diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in arid ecosystems

The flora of arid ecosystem remains under continuous abiotic stress like draft and salt accumulation, which induces the development of physiological and molecular stress responses in them. This allows the plants to grow normally under such harsh environment. Aridification is a worldwide problem in agriculture and crop production. It has been found that there is a huge built-up of microorganisms that support the plants to cope up with such environments by developing adaptation strategies (Asaf et al., 2017). It is evident from literature that plant-associated extremophilic and extremotolerant actinobacteria comprised the group of less investigated microbes. It has been reported that actinobacteria residing in deserts display immense capability to survive under adverse conditions of pH or salinity and possess noteworthy gene clusters to produce bioactive compounds (Mohammadipanah and Wink, 2016). A very few reports are, however, available on the endophytic actinobacteria from arid plants, thus there are good opportunities to study and explore diversity of new microbial species in the plants from arid zones (Thumar et al., 2010).

Huang et al. (2012) reported actinobacteria from arid plants, which included several genera like Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Nocardia, Nonomuraea, and Amycolatopsis. Drought tolerant endophytic actinobacteria, Streptomyces coelicolor DE07, Streptomyces olivaceus DE10 and Streptomyces geysiriensis DE27 are some of the endophytic actinobacteria reported in the plants of arid regions (Yandigeri et al., 2012). Goudjal et al. (2014) reported 22 Streptomyces spp. and five non-Streptomyces spp. on the basis of morphology and chemotaxonomic analyses, isolated randomly from five plants well adapted to the poor sandy soil and arid climatic conditions of the Algerian Sahara. Streptomyces mutabilis strain IA1, isolated from Saharan soil, was another endophyte as it colonized inside the caryopsis up to the endocarp layer in the wheat plant (Toumatia et al., 2016). Wang et al. (2015a,b) had reported isolation of novel endophytic actinobacteria like Frigoribacterium endophyticum and Labedella endophyticum from the roots of plant Anabis eliator from Urumqi (cold arid region), China. Novel endophyte, Streptomyces zhaozhouensis was isolated from Candelabra aloe which is a succulent collected from Zhaozhou, China (He et al., 2014). A novel species, Streptomyces ginkgonis has been isolated from the seeds of Ginkgo biloba (Yan et al., 2017). Glycomyces anabasis, a novel endophytic actinobacterium had been reported from the roots of Anabasis aphylla L of arid region in China (Zhang et al., 2018). In a study on endophytic actinobacteria from the plant Ferula sinkiangensis K. M. Shen, 125 endophytic strains were isolated from the roots. These actinobacteria belonged to 3 phyla, 13 orders, 23 families and 29 genera which contained potential novel species (Liu Y. et al., 2017). Plant growth promoting actinobacteria belonging to genus Amycolatopsis were also identified during this work. Metagenomic study of arid soil has shown the presence of the genera Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Saccharothrix, Streptosporangium, Cellulomonas, Amycolatopsis, Geodermatophilus, Lechevalieria, Nocardia, and Actinomadura, but no such reports are available on endophytes from the arid plants (Mohammadipanah and Wink, 2016). Streptomyces, Actinoallomurus, Amycolatopsis, Kribbella, and Microbispora were isolated from healthy roots of wattle tree, Acacia auriculiformis (Thamchaipenet et al., 2010). Despite water and nutrient deprived conditions, the flora of arid region was inhabited by many endophytic actinobacteria that included majorly Streptomyces, followed by other rare genera and novel species (Table 1).

Table 1.

Endophytic actinobacterial diversity in plants of special habitats.

Habitat	Host plant	Endophytic actinobacteria	References
CROPS PLANTS
Saline	Limonium sinense	Kineococcus endophytica KLBMP 1274T, Streptomyces sp. KLBMP 5084, Glutamicibacter halophytocola sp. nov. KLBMP 5180	Bian et al., 2012a; Feng et al., 2017
Arid	Lupinus termis	Actinoplane missouriensis CPWT, CPNWT, CNPM	El-Tarabily, 2003
Arid	Triticum aestivum	Streptomyces sp., Microbispora sp., Micromonospora sp., Nocardioides sp.	Coombs and Franco, 2003
Arid	Curcuma phaeocaulis	Streptomyces phytohabitans KLBMP 4601T	Bian et al., 2012b
Arid (Cold)	Solanum melongena	Nonomuraea solani NEAU-Z6T	Wang et al., 2013
Arid	Glycine max	Actinoplanes hulinensis NEAU-M9T, Streptomyces harbinensi NEAU-Da3T, Wangella harbinensis NEAU-J3T	Jia et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2013
Aquatic	Oryza sativa (Thai jasmine rice plant)	Actinoallomurus oryzae sp. nov. GMKU 370T	Indananda et al., 2011
WOODY PLANTS
Arid	Acacia auriculiformis	Actinoallomurus acaciae GMKU 931T, Streptomyces sp. GMKU 937, GMKU 940, Actinoallomurus coprocola GMKU 943, Amycolatopsis tolypomycina GMKU 932, Kribbella sp. GMKU 938, Microbispora mesophila GMKU 941 and GMKU 942	Bunyoo et al., 2009; Thamchaipenet et al., 2010
Arid	Eucalyptus microcarpa	Promicromonospora endophytica EUM 273T	Kaewkla and Franco, 2013
Arid	Camptotheca acuminate	Blastococcus endophyticus YIM 68236T, Plantactinospora endophytica YIM 68255T	Zhu et al., 2012, 2013
Semi- Arid	Dracaena cochinchinensis	Streptomyces sp. (HUST 001, HUST 011, HUST 014, 015, 018) Nocardiopsis sp. HUST 017, Pseudonocardia sp. HUST 013	Salam et al., 2017
Mangrove (Lowlands)	Aquilaria crassna	Streptomyces javensis GQ179657, Nonomuraea rubra GQ179656, Actinomadura glauciflava GQ179654, Pseudonocardia halophobica GQ179660, Nocardia alba GQ179653	Nimnoi et al., 2010
Mangrove	Xylocarpus granatum	Jishengella endophytica 202201T	Xie et al., 2011
Mangrove	Avicennia marina, Aegiceras corniculatum, Kandelia obovota, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, and Thespesia populnea	Streptomyces sp., Curtobacterium sp., Mycobacterium sp., Micrococcus sp., Brevibacterium sp., Kocuria sp., Nocardioides sp., Kineococcus sp., Kytococcus sp., Marmoricola sp., Microbacterium sp. Micromonospora, sp., Actinoplanes sp., Agrococcus sp., Amnibacterium sp., Brachybacterium sp., Citricoccus sp., Dermacoccus sp., Glutamicibacter sp., Gordonia sp., Isoptericola sp., Janibacter sp., Leucobacter sp., Nocardia sp., Nocardiopsis sp., Pseudokineococcus, sp., Sanguibacter sp., Verrucosispora sp.	Jiang et al., 2018
Mangrove	Thespesia populnea	Marmoricola endophyticus 8BXZ-J1T	Jiang et al., 2017
MEDICINAL PLANTS
Arid	Lobelia clavatum	Pseudonocardia endophytica YIM 56035T	Chen et al., 2009
Arid	Elaeagnus angustifolia	Micromonospora sp. D30401, D30202, D30511 C10401 and D30407, Nonomureae sp. D10204, Pseudonocardia sp. C20201 planotetraspora sp. C10404	Chen et al., 2011
Arid	Aloe arborescens	Micrococcus aloeverae AE-6T, Streptomyces zhaozhouensis NEAU-LZS-5T	He et al., 2014; Prakash et al., 2014
Arid (Cold)	Psammosilene tunicoides	Allostreptomyces psammosilenae YIM DR4008T	Huang et al., 2017
Mangrove	Centella asiatica	Streptomyces sp., wenchangensis 234402, Actinoplanes brasiliensis IFO13938, Couchioplanes caeruleus SCC 1014, Gordonia otitidis IFM 10032, Micromonospora schwarzwaldensis HKI0641	Ernawati et al., 2016
Mangrove	Terminalia mucronata	Micromonospora terminaliae CAP94T	Kaewkla et al., 2017
Mangrove	Mangrove medicinal Plants of Macao	Friedmanniella sp. 4Q3S-3 and Nakamurellas sp. 2Q3S-4-2	Li et al., 2017
OTHER PLANTS
Mangroves	Jatropha curcas	Jatrophihabitans endophyticus S9-650T, Nocardioides panzhihuaensis KLBMP 1050T, Nocardia endophytica KLBMP 1256T, Kibdelosporangium phytohabitans KLBMP 1111T	Qin et al., 2011, 2012b, 2015; Xing et al., 2011; Madhaiyan et al., 2013
Mangrove	Sonneratia apetala	Micromonospora sonneratiae 274745T	Li et al., 2013
Mangrove	Bruguiera sexangula	Mangrovihabitans endophyticus S3Cf-2T	Liu S. W. et al., 2017
Saline	Salicornia europaea	Modestobacter roseus KLBMP 1279T	Qin et al., 2013a
Saline	Tamarix chinensis	Streptomyces halophytocola KLBMP 1284T	Qin et al., 2013b
Saline	Dendranthema indicum	Glycomyces phytohabitans KLBMP 1483T, Amycolatopsis jiangsuensis KLBMP 1262T	Xing et al., 2013, 2014
Saline	Viola philippica	Micromonospora violae NEAU-zh8T	Zhang et al., 2014b
Saline	Costus speciosus	Micromonospora costi CS1-12T	Thawai, 2015
Saline	Glycyrrhiza uralensis	Phytoactinopolyspora endophytica	Li et al., 2015
Saline	Salsola affinis	Okibacterium endophyticum EGI 650022T, Arthrobacter endophyticus EGI 6500322T	Wang et al., 2015c, Wang et al., 2015d
Arid	Dysophylla stellata	Rothia endophytica YIM 67072T	Xiong et al., 2013
Arid	Anabasis elatior	Frigoribacterium endophyticum EGI 6500707T, Labedella endophytica EGI 6500705T	Wang et al., 2015a, Wang et al., 2015b
Arid	Anabasis aphylla L.	Glycomyces anabasis EGI 6500139T	Zhang et al., 2018
Arid	Ferula sinkiangensis	Amycolatopsis sp. SX2R71	Liu Y. et al., 2017
Aquatic	Seaweed	Streptomyces sp.	Hemalatha and Rasool, 2017
Aquatic	Thalassia hemprichii	Micromonospora sp. (HCZ27 HCZ42, M8Z28, G2Z37), Saccharomonospora sp. (M8Z39, G2Z41, G2Z21), Mycobacterium sp. G2Z43, Actinomycetospora lutea G2Z35, Nonomuraea maheshkhaliensis M1Z44, Verrucosispora sediminis M1Z33, Nocardiopsis composta M1Z45, Microbacterium esteraromaticum HCZ21, Glycomyces arizonensis HCZ4, Streptomyces sp.	Wu et al., 2012

Diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in mangrove and non-mangrove saline ecosystems

The intertidal zone of estuaries, backwaters, deltas, creeks, lagoons, marshes, and mud-lands are the main habitats of mangrove forests. They are also known as coastal wetland forests which cover around 25% of the overall world's coastline (Spalding et al., 1997; Alongi, 2002). Environment of the mangroves in terms of geographical location, pH, temperature, salinity, moisture and nutrients is highly diverse and different (Amrita et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014). In tropical mangroves, 91% of the total microbial biomass is bacteria and fungi, another 7% is algae, and 2% is protozoa (Alongi, 1988). They are known for their productivity but very few investigations have been carried on the microbial diversity, specifically for endophytic actinobacteria.

Soil and sediments of mangrove ecosystems have been found to be excellent sources of novel actinobacterial strains (Ara et al., 2007; Han et al., 2007; Eccleston et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2008; Azman et al., 2015). While similar extensive reports are not awailable for endophytic actinobacteria but the novelity in endophytic community could be expected since soil and sedinments serve as reservoir for them. Gupta et al. (2009) reported 105 isolates of endophytic actinobacteria from 19 mangrove plants of Bhitarkanika region, India. Characterization of these isolates led to identification of 20 Strptomyces spp., wherein S. exfoliates and S. auranticus were reported from all the plants. But S. halstedii, S. longisproflavus and S. albidoflavus were reported only from Kandelia candel. Upto 118 actinobacterial strains were isolated by Wei et al. (2010) from the plant tissue sampls of Shankou Mangrove Nature Reserve, China. Majority of these isolates were Streptomyces spp. (37%), followed by Micromonospora spp. (21%). The genera Saccharothrix and Nocardia contained three isolates each, while both Nocardiopsis and Lentzea had one isolate each. Higher numbers of endophytic actinobacteria were reported from the mangrove plant Bruguiera gymnorrhiza of the Andaman Islands; details are yet to be investigated (Baskaran et al., 2012). Another endophytic halotolerant actinobacteria, Saccharopolyspora dendranthemae, was isolated from a coastal salt marsh plant at Jiangsu, China (Zhang et al., 2013). Isolation of several actinobacterial strains belonging to the genera Streptomyces, Nocardiopsis, Pseudonocardia, Agrococcus, and Isoptericola have been reported from the mangrove plants in Beilun River, Beilum Estuary National Nature Reserve, China (Yang et al., 2015). These isolates were found to produce bioactive compounds which inhibited pathogens like Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris, hemolytic Streptococcus sp., and Klebsiella pneumoniae. A novel endophyte, Phycicoccus endophyticus, was reported from the Bruguiera gymnorhiza, a plant that belonged to Zhanjiang Mangrove Forest National Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China (Liu et al., 2016). Isolation of 11 actinobacterial strains was reported from the mangrove plants, Rhizophora mucronata and Sonneratia caseolaris. These isolates were found to be good source of antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds (Mesta et al., 2017). A large number of mangrove forests still remain untapped and could prove to be novel sources for isolation of rare and environmentally important endophytic actinobacteria.

Mangrove endophytes are rich in diversity as more than 10 isotales belonging to new species have been discovered from this source in the last few years (Jiang et al., 2017; Liu S. W. et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2017). A new species of endophytic actinobacteria belonging to the genus Marmoricola was reported for the first time from the mangrove plant (Jiang et al., 2017). Jiang et al. (2018) has recently reported endophytic actinobacteria from five different mangrove plants from Beilun Estuary National Nature Reserve, China. Prolific diversity of culturable endophytic actinobacteria had been reported, which included 7 orders, 15 families and 28 genera with significant novelty as there were potentially 7 new species of different genera. Furthermore, the genera, Sanguibacter, and Citricoccus, were reported for the first time in this study. Mangrove plants of Macao were also reported to be diverse in terms of novel genera and species of endophytic actinobacteria (Li et al., 2017). Two new species of rare genera Friedmanniella and Nakamurella were found among 192 endophytic actinobactrial strains isolated from 12 plants, which included 30 genera, 17 families, and 8 orders (Li et al., 2017). Mangrovihabitans endophyticus, a novel genus and novel species was reported from the mangrove plant Bruguiera sexangula (Liu S. W. et al., 2017). A large number of mangrove forests still remain untapped and could prove to be sources for isolation of rare and ecologically important endophytic actinobacteria.

Beside mangroves, halophytic plants from other saline environments have also been explored for endophytic actinobacteria. Saline conditions present a harsh environment for plant species as only <0.2% of the species are evolved to reproduce when exposed to seawater (Flowers and Colmer, 2015). Endophytes residing within such plants are reported to be one of the critical factors that contribute to the survival of these plants in saline environment (Sgroy et al., 2009). A few reports are available on the isolation and characterization of endophytic actinobacteria. A novel isolate, Modestobacter roseus KLBMP 1279^T, was obtained from the roots of Salicornia europaea, a halophyte of coastal region of Jiangsu Province, China (Qin et al., 2013a). A novel endophytic actinobacterium, Okibacterium endophyticum, capable of growth at high salt concentration (upto 7% NaCl) and at high pH was reported to be inhabitant of the roots of the halophyte Salsola affinis (Wang et al., 2015c). Amycolatopsis jiangsuensis sp. nov., was isolated from a coastal plant Dendranthema indicum (Linn.) Des Moul collected from the coastal region of Nantong, China. From this data and some other reports summarized in Table 1, it is evident that novel actinobacterial species had been reported from the halophytic plants of various regions. A scan through literature appeared to suggest that halophytic plants presented an attractive source for novel endophytic actinobacteria, most of which are yet to be explored.

Diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in aquatic ecosystems

The aquatic ecosystem is the largest contributor of the earth's biodiversity. Two fifths of earth's surface is freshwater ecosystem while it's 20th part of the total water (Alexander and Fairbridge, 1999). Lentic (include pools, ponds, and lakes), lotic (streams and rivers) and wetlands are the basic freshwater ecosystems. Rooted plants mainly occur in shallow water. Roots in aquatic plants are poorly developed (Sculthorpe, 1985). Association of diverse actinobacterial communities with marine sponges and soft corals has generated keen interest among researchers (Govindasamy et al., 2014). In view of these findings, it can be expected that significant diversity and novelty in endophytic actinobacterial communities of aquatic plants is waiting to be revealed. The wetlands, known for their fertility and nutrient richness, are among the most studied of the aquatic ecosystems. Rice plants from the wetlands had been explored for endophytic microbial communities as they might be associated with crop yield and also for their role in anaerobic methanogenesis causing global climate change (Bernstein et al., 2007).

A report on seagrass root-associated microorganisms suggested actinobacteria to be the first root colonizers (Jensen et al., 2007). In a study of 110 actinobacteria isolated from seagrass, ten genera of actinobacteria: Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Saccharomonospora, Mycobacterium, Actinomycetospora, Nonomuraea, Verrucosispora, Nocardiopsis, Microbacterium, and Glycomyces were reported along with four novel species (Wu et al., 2012). Twenty-one endophytic actinobacteria isolated from marine seaweed, Kovalam Beach, India, were used in generating copper nanoparticles that were active against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The 16S rRNA analysis showed that 2 of the 21 isolates belong to the Streptomyces sp. (Hemalatha and Rasool, 2017). In another study of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from marine green algae Cauler pataxifolia, it was found that DSM3 had potential in producing antibiotic against multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Rajivgandhi et al., 2018). He also isolated Nocardiopsis sp. GRG1 (KT235640), an endophytic actinobacterium from brown algae. It was also active against multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Rajivgandhi et al., 2016). There are very few reports from the marine non-mangrove environments. Due to water logged condition and high salinity of oceans, the aquatic flora is under immense stress and is of immense importance due to its capacity to withstand such conditions. There is probability that the associating microorganisms could have played significant role in survival of this aquatic flora. Therefore, an extensive research on endophytic actinobacteria of marine plants is called for establishing their significance in growth and survival of the plants under such conditions.

16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of endophytic actinobacterial diversity in special niches

Nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA gene of endophytic actinobacteria (Table 1) were retrieved from NCBI GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses of these sequences were performed using the software, Phylogeny.fr (Dereeper et al., 2008, 2010). Sequences were saved in FASTA format and then copied and pasted at the space provided in the online tool. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out using maximum likelihood. We have used one click mode which is an automated programme that performs step by step analysis starting from the alignment of the sequences (MUSCLE 3.8.31; Edgar, 2004), alignment refinement (Gblocks 0.91b), phylogeny (PhyML 3.1/3.0 aLRT) (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003; Anisimova and Gascuel, 2006) to the tree rendering (TreeDyn 198.3; Chevenet et al., 2006). Further, the Inkscape 0.92 was used to make any highlighting and editing in the tree for clarity of facts (www.inkscape.org). Escherichia coli K-12 strain DH10B was used as outgroup for this phylogenetic study.

In order to consider evolutionary relatedness among the isolates falling in the same clade, bootstrap value of ≥85% and ≥90% were considered for determining closeness among different genera and different species of the same genus respectively. Some general observations that could be made based on this criterion from the data presented in Figure 1, included: (1) Different species of the same genus either from different or the same habitats showed high bootstrap values (≥90%) indicating high degree of relatedness among them; (2) different genus from the same or different niche displayed bootstrap values of ≥85%, suggesting closer evolutionary relationship among them. In addition, different species of a genus from the same habitat were found to be placed within the same clade but the bootstrap values were <65%, indicating low confidence level in respect of their evolutionary closeness. However, for a deeper insight into evolutionary aspects of these microbes, further investigations involving other evolutionary parameters appear necessary.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic diversity of some endophytic actinobacteria from extreme ecological niches based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was constructed using “one click” mode in Phylogeny.fr. E. coli was used as outgroup for this study.

Metagenomics based diversity of endophytic actinobacteria

Culturable approach to study diversity is often limited by access to only a minor fraction of the microbial community. The metagenomic approach, which employs PCR-based culture-independent method, offers a more comprehensive view of the diversity as it includes both culturable and non-culturable part of the population. Some of the recent metagenomic studies that highlighted the importance of the uncultured endophytic actinobacteria in the diversity of endophytic actinobacterial population are being discussed.

In the study of community structure of endophytic actinobacteria of the Pseudowintera colorata (Horopito), a native medicinal plant of New Zealand, it was seen that the microbial communities in leaves were more diverse as compared to the roots and stems on the basis of DGGE pattern. The abundance of actinobacterial taxa was highest in stems (39%), followed by leaves (34%), and roots (27%). However, three clones among them were identified as uncultured bacteria (Purushotham et al., 2018). Similar study of the endophytic actinobacterial population from medicinal plant Centella asiatica produced 16 major clones pertaining to the various communities of actinobacteria in the sample. Community of actinobacteria in the plant tissues was slightly more diverse than those of rhizosphere in this case (Ernawati et al., 2016). However, Streptomyces sp. was the abundant followed by members of the family Micromonosporaceae and Gordoniaceae. Furthrmore, the uncultured bacterial abundance was also significantly high. It shows that there is a need for optimization of isolation procedures in order to enhance the chances (Ernawati et al., 2016). According to a report on endophytic actinobacterial species diversity in the stem of Gynura cusimbua by 16S rRNA, it was observed that out of 63 positive clones, 16S rRNA sequence of 59 strains had higher similarity to the closest type strain and belonged to the genera Microbacterium, Arthrobacter, Micrococcus, Curtobacterium, Okibacterium, Quadrisphaera, and Kineococcus respectively (Zhang et al., 2016). On the other hand, the rest of clones were showing little similarity and belonged to unclassified families: Micrococcineae, Intrasporangiaceae, and Microbacteriaceae that are supposed to be uncultured endopohytic actinobacteria (Zhang et al., 2016). Culture independent methods were also used for the community study of the endophytes related to the sponges, Hymeniacidon perleve and Sponge sp. An uncultured actinobacterium of the genus Acidimicrobium accounted for 33% and 24%, respectively in the above two sponges (Xin et al., 2008). Some other reports are also available on the metagenomic studies of stem and roots of rice (Tian et al., 2007), roots of wheat (Conn and Franco, 2004), roots and shoots of Aquilaria crassna (Nimnoi et al., 2010), leaves of grapevine (Bulgari et al., 2009), and Maytenus austroyunnanensis (Qin et al., 2012a). These studies revealed that the diversity of uncultured endophytic actinobacteria is comparable to those of the cultured endophytic actinobacteria. In order to get complete information on the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria and their functional importance, it is important to study the uncultured endophytic actinobacteria by metagenomic approach along with the culturable ones.

Chemical diversity and therapeutic significance of secondary metabolites produced by endophytic actinobacteria

Phytochemical profiling to identify and discover therapeutic compounds from plant extracts has been a common practice since long (Tiwari et al., 2011; Ahmad et al., 2013). However, comparable studies on microbial extracts are scanty. In view of immense potential of the secondary metabolites of actinobacteria for diverse applications, it is highly desirable that vigourous efforts are made to explore the chemical diversity of these metabolites. It is in the light of this observation that the relevant information from literature is being presented here.

Actinobacteria are known producers of a broad spectrum of bioactive molecules. They employ non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) and polyketide synthase (PKS) pathways to achieve the structural and functional diversity of their secondary metabolites. They are reported to produce immunosuppressants (e.g., rapamycin), antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin), anticholesterol drugs (e.g., lovastatin), and anticancer drugs (e.g., epothilone B) which underlined their indispensibility for the pharmaceutical industries (Miller et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2015). Actinobacteria in general and Streptomyces spp. in particular have been explored extensively for drugs and therapeutics. The secondary metabolites produced by the endophytic actinobacteria were reported to fall majorly under pharmaceutically important classes like alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, terpenoids, phenolics, quinones, and peptides (Yu et al., 2010). For instance, in a study of isolation and characterization of compounds from mangrove endophytic actinobacteria, 73 novel compounds and 49 known compounds were characterized as alkaloids, benzene derivatives, cyclopentenone derivatives, dilactones, macrolides, 2-pyranones and sesquiterpenes (Xu et al., 2014). Chemical diversity of therapeutically important metabolites from endophytic actinobacteria have been analyzed in the present work. Chemical classes have been defined for several of such compounds, as presented in Table 2 and discussed briefly in the following sections. Strucutre of some of these compounds has been given in Table 3.

Table 2.

Chemical diversity of the metabolites of endophytic actinobacteria and their therapeutic significance.

Bioactive Compounds	Habitat	Plant source	Therapeutic application	Actinobacteria species	References
ALKALOIDS
6-Prenylindole	Temperate	Allium tuberosum	Antifungal	Streptomyces sp. TP-A0595	Sasaki et al., 2002
Anicemycin	Temperate	Aucuba japonica	Antitumor (anchorage-independent growth inhibitor)	Streptomyces thermoviolaceus TP-A0648	Igarashi, 2004
Kakadumycin A	Arid	Gravillea pteridifolia	Antibacterial, Antimalaria	Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30566	Castillo et al., 2003
Diketopiperazine, Gancidin W	Tropical	Shorea ovalis	Low toxic, Antimalarial agent	Streptomyces sp. SUK10	Zin et al., 2017
Cyclo-(L-Val-L-Pro), Cyclo-(L-Leu-L-Pro), Cyclo-(L-Phe-L-Pro), Cyclo-(L-Val-L-Phe), and N-(7-hydroxy-6-methyl-octyl)-acetamide. (Diketopiperazines)	Tropical	Zingiber spectabile	Antibacterial	Streptomyces sp.SUK 25	Alshaibani et al., 2017
1-Acetyl-β-carboline, Indole-3-carbaldehyde, 3-(Hydroxyacetyl)-Indole, Brevianamide F, and Cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Phe)	Aquatic (wetland)	Vochysia divergens	Antibacterial	Aeromicrobium ponti LGMB491	Gos et al., 2017
1-Vinyl-b-carboline-3-Carboxylic acid, Indole-3- carbaldehyde, Indole-3-acetic acid and Indole-3- carboxylic acid	Aquatic (wetland)	Vochysia divergens	Antibacterial activity	Microbispora sp. LGMB259	Savi et al., 2015b
Lansai A-D	Tropical	Ficus benzamina	Antifungal and anticancer	Streptomyces sp. SUC1	Tuntiwachwuttikul et al., 2008
3-Acetonylidene-7-Prenylindolin-2-one and 7-Isoprenylindole-3-carboxylic acid	Arid (Cold)	Glycine max	Antifungal	Streptomyces sp. neau-D50	Zhang et al., 2014a
2-(furan-2-yl)-6-(2S,3S,4-trihydroxybutyl)pyrazine	Mangrove	Xylocarpus granatum	Antiviral	Jishengella endophytica 161111	Wang et al., 2014
POLYKETIDES
Pterocidin	Subtropical	Pteridium aquilinum	Anticancer	Streptomyces hygroscopicus TP-A0451	Igarashi et al., 2006
Linfuranone	Tropical	Clinacanthus siamensis	Antimicrobial, non-cytotoxic	Microbispora sp. GMKU 363	Indananda et al., 2013
Clethramycin	Tropical	Clethra barbinervis	Antifungal	Streptomyces hygroscopicus TP-A0623	Furumai et al., 2003
Ansamitocin	Tropical	Maytenus serrata	Antibacterial and antitumor	Actinosynnema pretiosum	Higashide et al., 1977; Siyu-Mao et al., 2013
TERPENES AND TERPENOIDS
Demethylnovobiocins	Temperate	Aucuba japonica	Antimicrobial	Streptomyces sp. TPA0556	Igarashi, 2004
Cedarmycin A and B	Temperate	Aucuba japonica	Antibacterial, anti-Candida	Streptomyces sp. TP-A0456	Sasaki et al., 2001
Xiamycin	Mangrove	Bruguiera gymnorrhiza	Antiviral	Streptomyces sp.GT2002/1503	Ding et al., 2010
COUMARINS (ALPHA BENZOPYRONES)
5,7-Dimethoxy-4-pmethoxylphenylcoumarin; 5,7-Dimethoxy-4-phenylcoumarin	Tropical	Zingiber officinale	Antifungal agent, Antioxidants, Antitumor	Streptomyces aureofaciens CMUAc130	Taechowisan et al., 2007
Saadamycin	Marine	Aplysina fistularis	Antifungal agent	Streptomyces sp. Hedaya 48	El-Gendy and El-Bondkly, 2010
FLAVONOIDS (GAMMA BENZOPYRONES)
7-Methoxy-3, 3′,4′,6-tetrahydroxyflavone and 2′,7-Dihydroxy-4′,5′-Dimethoxyisoflavone, Fisetin, Naringenin, 3′-Hydroxydaidzein, Xenognosin	Tropical	Boesenbergia rotunda (L.)	Antibacterial	Streptomyces sp. BT01	Taechowisan et al., 2014
Kaempferol, Isoscutellarin, Umbelliferone and Cichoriin	Temperate	Alpinia galanga	Antioxidants	Streptomyces sp. Tc052	Taechowisan et al., 2009
QUINONES
Alnumycin	Temperate	Alnus glutinosa	Antibacterial	Streptomyces sp.DSM 1175	Bieber et al., 1998
Celastramycins A and B	Tropical	Celestracae family plants	Antimycobacterial, Antibacterial	Streptomyces setonii, sp. Q21, Streptomyces sampsonii, QuH- 8	Pullen et al., 2002
Lupinacidin C	Arid	Lupinus angustifolius	Antitumor	Micromonospora lupini Lupac 08	Trujillo et al., 2007; Igarashi et al., 2011
Naphtomycin A	Tropical	Maytenus hookeri	Antitumor	Streptomyces sp. CS	Lu and Shen, 2007
TANNINS
Streptol	Arid (Cold)	Cucubalus sp.	Anti-fungal	Dactylosporangiumsp. strain SANK 61299	Okazaki, 2003
PEPTIDES AND THEIR DERIVATIVES
Actinomycin X2	Temperate	Rhododendron sp.	Antimicrobial	Streptomyces sp. R-5	Shimizu et al., 2004
Munumbicins A, B, C and D	Tropical	Kennedia nigricans	Antimicrobial, Antimalarial, Antitumor	Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30562	Castillo et al., 2002
Coronamycin	Tropical	Monstera sp.	Antifungal, Antimalarial	Streptomyces. sp. MSU-2110	Ezra et al., 2004
Munumbicins E-4 and E-5	Tropical	Kennedia nigricans	Antimalarial, antibacterial	Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30562	Castillo et al., 2006
S-adenosyl-Nacetylhomocysteine	Tropical	Puereria candollei	Antioxidant, Neuroprotection	Micromonospora sp. PC1052.	Boonsnongcheep et al., 2017
Proximicin	Arid	Sonchus oleraceus	Antibacterial, Antitumor	Verrucosispora maris AB-18-032.	Fiedler et al., 2008; Roh et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2016
FATTY ACID DERIVATIVE
6-alkalysalicilic acids, salaceyins A and B	Arid	Ageratum conyzoides	Anticancer	Streptomyces laceyi MS53	Kim et al., 2006
7-Octadecenamide	Arid	Sonchus oleraceus	Antimicrobial	Nocardia caishijiensis	Tanvir et al., 2016
9, 12- Octadecadienamide (Linoleamide)	Arid	Sonchus oleraceus	Antimicrobial	Pseudonocardia carboxydivorans SORS 64b	Tanvir et al., 2016

Table 3.

Chemical Structures of some important therapeutic compounds of different chemical classes isolated from endophytic actinobacteria.

Bioactive compounds	Chemical structure	References
ALKALOIDS
6 Prenylindole		Sasaki et al., 2002
Anicemycin		Igarashi, 2004
Gancidin W		Zin et al., 2017
Brevinamide F		Amar et al., 2012
Lansai A; R = H, Lansai B; R = CH3		Tuntiwachwuttikul et al., 2008
Lansai C; R = OH, D; R = H		Tuntiwachwuttikul et al., 2008
2-(furan-2-yl)-6-(2S,3S,4-trihydroxybutyl)pyrazine R = 1 R2 = H		Wang et al., 2014
POLYKETIDES
Pterocidin		Igarashi et al., 2006
Linfuranone		Indananda et al., 2013
Ansamitocin		Siyu-Mao et al., 2013
TERPENES AND TERPENOIDS
Demethylnovobiocins		Kominek, 1972
Cedarmycin		Sasaki et al., 2001
Xiamycin		Li et al., 2012
COUMARINS (ALPHA BENZOPYRONES)
5,7-Dimethoxy-4- pmethoxylphenylcoumarin		Indraningrat et al., 2016
Saadamycin		Indraningrat et al., 2016
FLAVONOIDS (GAMMA BENZOPYRONES)
7-Methoxy-3, 3′,4′,6-tetrahydroxyflavone		Molinstincts chemical structures ID CT1105232405
Fisetin		Khan et al., 2013
Naringenin		Taechowisan et al., 2014
Xenognosin		Taechowisan et al., 2014
Hydroxydaidzein		Taechowisan et al., 2014
Alnumycin		Bieber et al., 1998
QUINONES
Celestamycin A		Pullen et al., 2002
Celestamycin B		Pullen et al., 2002
Lupinacidin (R = CH3 or H)		Igarashi et al., 2011
Naphthomycin A		Lu and Shen, 2007
TANNINS
Streptol		Chemspider ID 4450703
PEPTIDES AND THEIR DERIVATIVES
Actinomycin X2		Shimizu et al., 2004
S-adenosyl-N acetylhomocysteine		Boonsnongcheep et al., 2017
Proximicin A		Fiedler et al., 2008
FATTY ACID DERIVATIVE
Linoleamide		CAS:3072-13-7
Salaceyins A(R = CH3) ; B (R = CH2CH3)		Kim et al., 2006

Alkaloids

Alkaloids are characterized by the presence of basic nitrogen (usually in a heterocycle). In recent years, the number of new alkaloids isolated, identified, and characterized for their medicinal potential from various sources including from the endophytic actinobacteria has increased. Paclitaxel (taxol), a well known anti-cancer drug, was originally isolated from the plant, Taxus baccata. Subsequently, it was also isolated from the endophytic actinobacteria of Taxus baccata: Kitasatospora sp. P and U 22869 (Caruso et al., 2000). Recently, various alkaloids, namely,1-acetyl-β-carboline, indole-3-carbaldehyde, tryptophol, 3-(hydroxyacetyl)-indole, brevianamide F, cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Phe), cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Leu), and cyclo-(L-Val-L-Phe) were reported from the endophyte, Aeromicrobium ponti LGMB491 isolated from Vochysia divergens (Gos et al., 2017). These compounds displayed very good antibacterial activities against various Staphylococcus spp. Other alkaloids, 3-acetonylidene-7-prenylindolin-2-one, and 7-isoprenyl indole-3-carboxylic acid, isolated from endophytic Streptomyces sp. neau- D50, possessed anti-cancer activity (Zhang et al., 2014a). β-Carbolines and 3-Indole compounds were obtained from the endophyte Microbiospora sp. LGMB259, which showed inhibitory activities against Gram-positive bacterial strains: Micrococcus luteus NRRL B-2618 and Kocuria rosea B-1106. They aslo possess cytotoxic activities against two human cancer cell lines: prostate cancer cell line PC3 and the non-small-cell lung carcinoma cell line (Savi et al., 2015a). Diketopiperazine also belongs to this family with very good medicinal property. In this context the antifungal and anticancer compounds, Lansai A-D, were reported from the endophytic Streptomyces sp. SUC1 isolated from aerial roots of Ficus benjamina (Tuntiwachwuttikul et al., 2008). Diketopiperazine gancidin W (GW) was isolated from the Streptomyces sp. SUK10, an endophyte from the bark of Shorea ovalis tree, and it was tested in vivo against Plasmodium berghei PZZ1/100 (Zin et al., 2017). Kakadumycin A, a quinoxaline antibiotic with broad spectrum activity against Gram-positive bacteria and malaria parasites was reported from endophytic Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30566, isolated from the fern, Grevillea pteridifolia. It was structurally similar to echinomycin, but had shown better antibiotic activity (Castillo et al., 2003). Antifungal compound, 6-Prenylindole was isolated from Streptomyces sp. TP-A0595, an endophyte of liverwort (Sasaki et al., 2002). Igarashi (2004) isolated pure compound anicemycin, a cytotoxic compound potentially active against tumor cell line at very low concentration.

Polyketides

This group of actinobacterial secondary metabolites includes compounds with diverse chemical structures having significant activities of therapeutic importance, like, anticancer, antifungal, anticholesteremic etc. Many reports have shown that endophytic actinobacteria are proven to be good source for the discovery of polyketide compounds. Endophyte S. hygroscopicus TP-A0623, isolated from the root of Clethra barbinervis, produced a polyene polyketide, clethramycin, known to inhibit both spheroplast regeneration and germ tube formation in Candida albicans, (Furumai et al., 2003). Ansamitocin, a polyketide macrolide, was isolated from endophytic actinobacteria Nocardia sp. no. C-15003 (Higashide et al., 1977). It had potent antibacterial and antitumor activities, and was structurally similar to maytansine, a known antibacterial drug. Another drug, pterocidin, derived from endophytic isolate, S. hygroscopicus TP-A0451 was cytotoxic against some human cancer cell lines (Igarashi et al., 2006). The compound, linfuranone isolated from Thai medicinal plant has shown antidiabetic and antiatherogenic activities in mouse ST-13 pre-adiopocytes (Indananda et al., 2013). Several polyketides compounds of endophytic actinobacterial origin were reported as summarized in Table 2.

Terpenes and terpenoids

Terpenes and terpenoids are known to be the primary constituents of the essential oils of many types of medicinal plants and flowers. They have been widely used for fragrances in perfumery, and in medicines. Besides plants, microbes have also been proved to be good sources for such compounds (Tholl, 2015). Biologically active terpenes and terpenoids have been isolated from several endophytic actinobacteria (Table 2). Cedarmycin A and B, isolated from an endophyte, Streptomyces sp. TPA0456, were found to possess broad spectrum anti-bacterial, and anti-fungal activities (Sasaki et al., 2001). It was seen to be specifically more potent against Candida glabrata. Only a few compounds with anti-viral activity had been reported from endophytic actinobacteria. One among them being xiamycin, produced by Streptomyces sp. GT2002/1503, isolated from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza that specifically blocked R5 tropic HIV infection (Ding et al., 2010).

Benzopyrones

The compounds from this class consist of a benzene ring joined to a pyrone ring. The benzopyrones can be subdivided into the benzo-alpha pyrones, which include mainly coumarins and the benzo-gamma pyrones, of which the flavonoids are principal members (Jain and Joshi, 2012).

Coumarins

(Benzo-alpha pyrones): Several novel compounds isolated from the endophytic actinobacteria belong to this class. Streptomyces sp. TPA0556 isolated from the plant Aucuba japonica produced two novel antibiotics: 7′- demethylnovobiocin and 5″-demethylnovobiocin with broad spectrum antibiotic activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens (Sasaki et al., 2001). A novel coumarin, saadamycin was reported from Streptomyces sp. Hedaya48 with significant antimycotic activity specifically against dermatophytes (El-Gendy and El-Bondkly, 2010). 5, 7-Dimethoxy-4-phenylcoumarin extracted from endophytic S. aureofaciens was effective in preventing or delaying formation of metastases (Taechowisan et al., 2007).

Flavonoids

(Gamma-benzopyrones): Flavonoids are polyphenolic structures, widely found in fruits, vegetables and certain beverages. They are known for their biochemical and antioxidant effects associated with various diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease (AD), atherosclerosis etc. (Panche et al., 2016). Some of the flavonoids from endophytic actinobacteria include: 7-methoxy-3,3′,4′,6-tetrahydroxyflavone; 2′,7-dihydroxy-4′,5′-dimethoxyisoflavone, fisetin, naringenin, 3′-hydroxydaidzein and xenognosin B. They were isolated from endophytic Streptomyces sp. BT01. It has shown good activity against Gram-positive bacteria; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25932, Bacillus cereus ATCC 7064, and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 (Taechowisan et al., 2014). Kaempferol, isoscutellarin, umbelliferone, and cichoriin are some other flavonoids obtained from the endophytic Streptomyces sp. Tc052, which showed anti-oxidative and inhibitory activities on nitric oxide production (Taechowisan et al., 2009).

Tannins

They are water soluble polyphenols that are majorly found in plant foods. They are reported to be involved in improving human health by providing anticancer and antibacterial activities. However, in many cases they can be inhibitory as they decrease the nutritional value of foods by forming complexes with proteins, starch, and digestive enzymes (Chung et al., 1998). Not many compounds of tannins family are reported from endophytic actinobacteria. Streptol, a tannin isolated from endophytic strain SANK 61299 of the actinobacterium Dactylosporangium sp. from the plant, Cucubalus sp. exibited broad spectrum antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Furumai et al., 2003).

Quinones

Quinones are a group of compounds produced by plants, fungi, and bacteria. They have an aromatic di-one or di-ketone system, generally derived from the oxidation of hydroquinones. They show potential therapeutic activities like neurological, antibacterial, antiplasmodial, antioxidantal, trypanocidal, antitumor, and anti-HIV that are shown to be related to the redox properties of their carbonyl functions (Villamil et al., 2004).

Streptomyces sp. CS, isolated from Maytenus hookeri, came into focus for the production of naphthomycin K, together with two known naphthomycins A and E which had shown cytotoxicity against P388 and A-549 cell lines (Lu and Shen, 2007). Another naphthoquinone, alnumycin was isolated from Streptomyces sp. DSM 11575, an endophyte inhabiting the root nodules of Alnus glutinosa. It has displayed narrow spectrum antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis tested by well diffusion assay. Endophytic actinobacterium Micromonospora lupine had been reported to produce anticancer compound lupinacidin (anthraquinone) A-C. Lupinacidin C was shown to inhibit invasion of murine colon carcinoma cells into the reconstituted basement membrane (Igarashi et al., 2011). Endophytic Streptomyces sp. MaBQuH-8, isolated from woods of the trees of family Celastraceae, was found to produce antibiotics: celastramycins A and B having antimicrobial activity against Gram positive bacteria and mycobacteria.

Fatty acid derivatives

Some bioactive compounds reported from endophytic actinobacteria fall into the category of fatty acid derivatives. The compounds: 7-coctadecenamide and 9,12-octadecadienamide (Linoleamide), were derived from two rare actinobacteria, Nocardia caishijiensis and Pseudonocardia carboxydivorans, isolated from the plants Sonchus oleraceus and Ageratum conyzoides respectively. These compounds had shown very good activity against various human pathogens including Candida spp. strains, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Tanvir et al., 2016). Kim et al. (2006) studied cytotoxic activity of 6-alkalysalicilic acids, salaceyins A and B from S. laceyi MS53 against human breast cancer cell line.

Peptides and their derivatives

Microorganisms play a significant role in the production of peptide antibiotics. Endophytic actinobacteria being unique in their habitat can be a source of some novel therapeutic peptides.

Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30562, an endophyte isolated from Kennedia nigriscans was reported to produce actinomycin X2, a broad-spectrum polypeptide antibiotic having potential activity against human and plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Castillo et al., 2006). Another endophyte, Streptomyces sp. TC022, isolated from the roots of Alpinia galangal, is capable of producing actinomycin D, highly potential as antifungal, and antitumor polypeptide. It was also active against plant and human fungal pathogens, for example, Colletotrichum musae and Candida albicans (Taechowisan et al., 2006). Coronamycin, identified as a complex of novel peptides antibiotics, was obtained from verticillate Streptomyces sp. MSU-2110 isolated from Monstera sp. It has potential activity against pythiaceous fungi and the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. It was also reported to be active against Plasmodium falciparum with IC₅₀ value of 9.0 ng/ml. In another study on the secondary metabolites of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from roots and root nodules of Pueraria candollei Graham ex Benth, isolation of S-adenosyl-N-acetylhomocysteine (an antibacterial and antioxidant compound) was isolated from Micromonospora sp. for the first time (Boonsnongcheep et al., 2017).

Therapeutic spectrum of uncharacterized metabolites

There are several reports demonstrating wide range of therapeutic properties for the metabolite preparations from endophytic actinobacteria. But isolation and characterization of the active compounds have not been undertaken for many of them. Endophytic Streptomyces sp. SUK 06, isolated from the plant Thottea grandiflora, was reported to produce metabolites with strong activity against bacterial pathogens including MRSA as well as phytopathogens (Ghadin et al., 2008). In a study on the endophytes associated with medicinal plants, many actinobacteria producing compounds with antibacterial activity against a panel of Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial pathogens were reported (Li et al., 2008). Like-wise endophytic actinobacteria isolated from the roots of Alpinia galangal, Streptomyces sp. Tc052, was shown to possess antimicrobial activity with MIC values lying between 64-128 μg/ml (Taechowisan et al., 2008). Streptomyces sp. TQR12-4, an endophyte of Citrus nobilis Lour was reported to produce thermostable antifungal compound with MIC values of 100 μg/ml and 400 μg/ml (Thao et al., 2016). Crude extracts of the metabolites from Microbispora sp. LGMB259, LGMB250, LGMB255 and LGMB256 showed more than 98% antitumor activity against Glioblastoma multiforme cells (Savi et al., 2015b). Furtermore, the metabolites of actinobacteria strains: SORS64b, SORS124, AGRS16, AGLS2, and AGRS19 isolated from the plants of Asteraceae family showed antioxidant property using DPPH assay (Tanvir et al., 2014). In another study on five endophytic isolates, it was reported that their metabolites displayed excellent antioxidant properties and were found to increase the survival of plants under oxidative stress (Babu et al., 2014). Ethyl acetate extract of cell-free broth of actinobacteria isolated from Catharantus roseus showed marked α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (Yokose et al., 1983). Some in vivo studies also showed that the partially purified metabolite preparations of endophytic actinobacterium, Streptomyces sp. worked effectively against diabetes by reducing systemic glucose levels in the experimental animals (Kulkarni-Almeida et al., 2011). Remarkable α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was reported by the metabolites produced by several strains of Streptomyces sp. isolated from the roots of Indonesian medicinal plants, Caesalpinia sappan (Pujiyanto et al., 2012). Antidiabetic activity was studied in the extract of Streptomyces sp. JQ92617, isolated from Rauwofia densiflora, while crude extract of S. longisporoflavus JX96594 was found to be a potential α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitor (Akshatha et al., 2014).

The foregoing discussion thus presents a strong evidence for the endophytic actinobacteria to be an excellent source for the production of a wide range of natural products with significant potential for therapeutic applications. The diversity of the compounds produced could be comparable to that of plants. The use of endophytic actinobacteria for production of therapeutic compounds may offer some distinct advantage over plants in terms of production under controlled environmental conditions for strict adherence to quality, shorter production period and sustainability.

Biosynthetic gene clusters in endophytic actinobacteria

It is evident from the literature that the genes involved in the synthesis of bioactive secondary metabolites are present in the actinobacterial genome in the form of gene clusters (Doroghazi and Metcalf, 2013). Genome mining tools have made it more convenient to look for innovations in natural product discovery (Corre and Challis, 2007). Majority of the bioactive compounds are encoded by large gene clusters such as polyketide synthases (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) with highly repetitive modules (Jackson et al., 2018).

The biosynthetic pathway of polyketides is governed by a complex enzyme system, called polyketide synthase encoded by PKS gene cluster. Aromatic polyketide synthases are encoded by PKS II. On the other hand, the polyketides formed as a result of condensation of acetate, propionate and butyrate acyl units are synthesized by modular polyketide synthase that is encoded by PKS I gene (Shinwari et al., 2013). Other than polyketide synthases, there is another class of enzyme known as Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS). NRPS gene clusters are involved in the biosynthesis of wide range of peptide antibiotics, toxins, siderophore, anti-inflammatory compounds, immunosuupressants etc. (Cane and Walsh, 1999; Crosa and Walsh, 2002; Mansson et al., 2011). Another gene cluster ANSA (ansamicin) is involved in the production of ansamycins; while OxyB codes for glycopeptide antibiotics (Ayuso-Sacido and Genilloud, 2005). In a study on taxonomic diversity and metabolic activity of endophytic actinobacteria of some medicinal plants, it was reported that all the 80 bioactive isolates possessed atleast one test gene. The frequency of occurrence biosynthetic gene clustures in the isolates was reported to be 55.0, 58.8, 90.0, 18.8, and 8.8% for the PKS-I, PKS-II, NRPS, ANSA, and OxyB genes respectively. In this study, it was also found that ANSA gene was more active in the rare actinobacteria, while PKSII genes were frequent in Streptomyces sp. However, the NRPS gene was found at almost same frequency in Streptomyces and non-Streptomyces spp. Approximatley, 46.3% of the isolates were found to be positive for all the four gene clusteres together (Qiu et al., 2015). This implied that gene clusteres are not species specific. In another study of 81 endophytic actinobacteria isolated from Rhynchotoechum ellipticum showing antimicrobial and antioxidant activities, presence of gene clusures were analyzed. The results showed that PKS I, PKS II, and NRPS gene clusteres occurred in 19, 51, and 30% of isolates respectively. However, there were 17 isolates possessing all the three genes clusteres. This study also reported that these isolates synthesized several antibiotics: erythromycin, ketoconazole, fluconazole, chloramphenicol, rifampicin and miconazole, phenolic compounds; catechin, kaempferol, chebulagic acid, chlorogenic acid, asiatic acid, ferulic acid, arjunic acid, gallic acid and boswellic acid, and paclitaxel. It is thus evident that these gene clusteres were reposnsible for the production of secondary metabolites (Passari et al., 2018). Frequencies for the presence of biosynthetic genes in the endophytic actinobacteria of the plant Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour was 29.4, 70.6, and 23.5%, for PKS-I, PKS-II, and NRPS respectively (Salam et al., 2017). Gene cluster encoding hybrid trans-acyltransferase (AT) polyketide was identified during the genome analysis of endophytic actinobacterium, Actinoplanes isolated from the plant Amphipterygium adstringens for the first time (Centeno-Leija et al., 2016). In genome analysis of the endophyte, Streptomyces kebangsaanensis, it was established that 24 gene clusters were involved in the production of a novel phenanzine. It was also predicted to be involved in the biosynthesis of polyketide, nonribosomal peptide, terpene, bacteriocin, and siderophore (Remali et al., 2017). Presence of PKS and NPRS genes were also repoted in the endophytic actinobacteria of aquatic ecosystem. In a study on endophytic actinobacteria isolated from sea grass Thalassiahemprichii, PKS-II, and NRPS genes were detected in almost all of the isolates while PKS-I could be amplified in only half of them (Wu et al., 2012). In another study involving 23 endophytic actinobacteria from tropical plants of Papua New Guinea and Mborokua Island, Solomon Islands, presence of all the three gene clusters PKS I, PKS II and NPRS were reported but no in vitro activity was detected. This observation led the authors to interpret that there was no correlation between the presence of gene cluster and the activity (Janso and Carter, 2010). But the inability to detect the bioactive metabolite might be due to non-expression of the genes under the experimental conditions for production.

Available whole genome draft of endophytic actinobacteria also revealed the presence of PKS and NPRS genes suggesting that these microbes are the possible source for many novel bioactive compounds. Genome Sequence of Microbispora sp. GMKU 363 harbor three type I PKS gene clusters associated with the synthesis of linfuranone (Komaki et al., 2015). Streptomyces scabrisporus NF3, an endophyte isolated from Amphipterygium adstringens, carries at least 50 gene clusters for the synthasis of polyketides and nonribosomal peptides (Vazquez-Hernandez et al., 2017). Genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. PRh5, a novel endophytic actinobacterium isolated from wild rice root, has been predicted to have putative nigericin and nocardamine biosynthetic gene clusters (Yang et al., 2014). Similarly, Streptomyces sp. XY006, an endophyte isolated from Tea (Camellia sinensis) had 27 possible secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters encoding for antimycin, melanin, informatipeptin, albaflavenone, and roseoflavin (Vazquez-Hernandez et al., 2017). Genome mining of Streptomyces wadayamensis A23, an endophytic strain showed the presence of biosynthetic gene clusteres for antimycins and candicidin (Angolini et al., 2016).

It has been reported that these gene clusters are involved not only in the biosynthesis of bioactive secondary metabolites, but also in the production plant growth promotion factors. Endophytic actinobacteria isolated from Artemisia annua possessed herbicidal activity against Echinochloa crusgalli and carried PKSI, PKSII, and NRPS gene clusters (Li et al., 2012). Kibdelosporangium phytohabitans KLBMP 1111^T, an endophyte of Jatropha curcas, possessed the gene clusters responsible for polyketide and nonribosomal peptide synthesis and also the genes related to the plant growth promoting factors, such as zeatin, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACCD) and siderophore (Qin et al., 2015).

Streptomyces sp. XY006 genome sequence revealed the presence of genes associated with synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, mineral phosphate solubilization, transport and assimilation, and also genes involved in fungal cell-wall degradation, such as a family 19 chitinases (Vazquez-Hernandez et al., 2017). Genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. GKU 895 isolated from sugarcane root, showed gene cluster related to plant growth-promoting activity (Kruasuwan et al., 2017). Endophytic actinobacteria isolates of halophytic plant Salsola imbricate were found to be active against phytopathogens Phytophthora capsici and Pythium ultimum and also possessed the biosynthetic gene cluster PKS I, II and NRPSs (Bibi et al., 2018). The screening of the gene clusters in the endophytic actinobacteria can be used as a high throughput method to carry out screening for the presence of bioactive secondary metabolites.

Opportunities for application of endophytic actinobacteria in agriculture

Use of chemical fertilizers, insecticides, pesticides, and other synthetic agents as nutrients or as biocontrol agents has led to increase in crop productivity and yield (Aktar et al., 2009). However, prolonged use of these substances had adverserly affected the physico-chemical properties of soil, leading to decline in soil fertility and microbial diversity. Also, use of synthetic insecticides and pesticides have resulted in resistant pests and insects along with bioaccumulation of harmful agricultural chemicals and their residues in the consumers invoking serious health concerns (Prashar and Shah, 2016). Evidently, such agricultural practices have come to be considered as non-viable and called for the development and implementation of sustainable alternatives.

Advances in the field of soil microbiome, plant microbiome and increasing understanding of plant-microbe interactions have opened up new vistas for sustainability in agriculture. In this section, we briefly discuss the potential applications of endophytic actinobacteria in protection of plants from diseases, plant nutrition, growth, and tolerence to biotic and abiotic stresses.

Endophytes in protection against plant diseases

It has been earlier reported in several studies that endophytic actinobacteria can effectively inhibit plant pathogens, thus protect the host-plants from diseases (Taechowisan et al., 2003; Cao et al., 2004). An endophytic actinobacterial strain CEN26 of Centella asiatica was inhibitory against the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. It acts by inhibiting germination of conidia and morphological development (Phuakjaiphaeo and Kunasakdakul, 2015). In a study involving 260 isolates of endophytic actinobacteria, majority of them were seen to be inhibiting plant pathogens, and thus had a protective role for protection of the hosts against diseases (Palaniyandi et al., 2013). The type of interaction among the actinobacteria and their host-plants seems to be important in suppression of diseases (Hasegawa et al., 2006; Maggini et al., 2017). Leaf blight disease of rice was cured to a greater extent by S. platensis (Wan et al., 2008). Mycolytic, parasitic, and antibiotic activities against Fusarium sp. was reported in Nocardiopsis sp. (Sabaou et al., 1983). Fifty-five percent of the total endophytes recovered from leaves of Paeonia lactiflora and Trifalium repens were found to inhibit growth of the phytopathogen, Rhizoctonia solani (Gu et al., 2006). Fistupyrone, isolated from Streptomyces sp. TP-A0569 inhibited in vivo infection of the seedlings of Chinese cabbage by necrotrophic plant pathogen, Alternaria brassicicola TP-F0423 (Igarashi et al., 2000). In a recent study, Streptomyces sp. PRY2RB2, an endophyte of the medicinal plant Pseudowintera colorata (Horopito), a native of New Zealand, have shown inhibitory activity against various phytopathogens: Neofusicoccum luteum ICMP 16678, N. parvum MM562, Ilyonectria liriodendri WPA1C and Neonectria ditissima ICMP 14417 (Purushotham et al., 2018). Endophytic actinobacterium, strain AR3, isolated from Emblica officinalis, inhibited the growth of Fusarium oxysporum (Kamboj et al., 2017). Another endophyte, Streptomyces sp. EN27, has also been reported to display antifungal activity against F. oxysporum (Conn et al., 2008). He also concluded that resistance to F. oxysporum by this strain occurred via an NPR-dependent pathway alongwith salicylic acid but was independent of jasmonic acid/ethylene (JA/ET) pathway. Some other reports of plant protection against phytopathogens have been documented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Endophytic actinobacteria in protection of host-plants against phytopathogens.

Endophyte	Host-plant	Target pathogen	References
Streptomyces sp. S30, Streptomyces sp. R18(6)	Lycopersicon esculentum	Rhizoctania solani	Cao et al., 2004; De Oliveira et al., 2010
Actinoplanes campanulatus, Micromonospora chalcea and Streptomyces spiralis	Cucumis sp.	Pythium aphanidermatum	El-Tarabily et al., 2010
Microbispora sp. A004 and A011, Streptomyces sp. A018	Brassica rapa	Plasmodiophora brassicae	Lee et al., 2008
Streptomyces diastaticus, Streptomyces fradiae, Streptomyces olivochromogenes, Streptomyces collinus, Streptomyces ossamyceticus Streptomyces griseus (CC1, CC4, CC12, CC20, CC23, CC29, CC31, CC38, CC41, CC42, CC52 and CC53)	Medicinal plants	Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoktonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria solani	Singh and Gaur, 2016
Streptomyces sp., LBR02, AB131-1 and AB131-2	Host plant information not available	Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo)	Hastuti et al., 2012
Streptomyces sp. DBT204	Solanum lycopersicum	Fusarium proliferatum	Passari et al., 2016
Leifsonia xyli BPSAC24,Streptomyces sp. BPSAC34	Eupatorium odoratum, Musa superb, Mirabilis jalapa, Curcuma longa, Clerodendrum colebrookianum, Alstonia scholaris, Centella asiatica,	Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium oxysporum ciceri, Fusarium prolifratum, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium graminearum, Colletotrichum capsici	Passari et al., 2015a
Microbispora sp. isolate 1and 5	Solanum tuberosum L.	Streptomyces scabies	Goodman, 2014
Streptomyces sp. R-5	Rhododendron sp.	Phytophthora cinnamom, Pestalotiopsis sydowiana	Shimizu et al., 2000
Streptomyces sp., MBPu-75 Streptomyces sp. MBCu-56	Cucumis sp.and Cucurbita sp.	Colletotrichum orbiculare	Shimizu et al., 2009
Streptomyces sp. RM 365	Leguminous plants	Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycine	Mingma et al., 2014
Streptomyces thermocarboxydus TF23, Streptomyces sp. TF2, TF21 and TF30	Lycospersicum esculentum	Rhizoctonia solani	Inderiati and Franco, 2008
Nocardiopsis sp. ac9, Streptomyces Violaceorubidus 6ca11, Streptomyces sp. ac19	Elaeis guineensis Jacq.	Ganoderma boninense	Ting et al., 2014
Streptomyces mutabilis CA- 2, Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus AA-2	Aristida pungens Cleome arabica Solanum nigrum Panicum turgidum, Astragallus armatus Peganum harmala Hammada scoparia Euphorbia helioscopia	Rhizoctonia solani	Goudjal et al., 2014
Streptomyces felleus YJ1	Brassica napus	Sclerotinia sclerotiorum	Cheng et al., 2014
Streptomyces sp.	Garuga pinnata Gmelina arborea Stephania venosa Melastoma malabathricum Merremia vitifolia	Pectobacterium carotovorum	Chankhamhaengdecha et al., 2013
S. griseorubiginosus-like strain	Musa acuminata	Fusarium oxysporum	Cao et al., 2005
Actinoplanes missouriensis CPWT	Lupinus termis	Plectosporium tabacinum	El-Tarabily et al., 2010
Streptomyces sp. EACK and Streptomyces sp. EAOP	Streptomyces lycopersicum Mill.	Ralstonia solanacearum	Sreeja and Gopal, 2013
Streptomyces sp. AzR-051, AzR- 049, AzR- 010	Azadirachta indica A. Juss.	Alternaria alternata	Verma et al., 2011
Streptomyces sp.AOK-30	Kalmia latifolia L.	Pestalotiopsis sydowiana	Nishimura et al., 2002
Streptomyces violaceusniger	Trees of Dehradun	Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Coriolus versicolor, Gloephyllum trabeum	Shekhar et al., 2006
Streptomyces sp. PRY2RB2	Pseudowintera colorata	Neofusicoccum luteum ICMP 16678, Nocardia parvum MM562, Ilyonectria liriodendri WPA1C, Neonectria ditissima ICMP 14417	Purushotham et al., 2018

Endophytic actinobacteria in plant growth promotion

Endophytic actinobacteria are known for their potential to affect plant growth and nutrient uptake (Rajkumar et al., 2006). They are reported as plant growth promoters in cereals and legumes (Mishra et al., 1987; Salam et al., 2016). In some studies, it was observed that endophytes are very good producers of plant growth promoting factors like phytohormones. Indole acetic acid (IAA) is among the highly reported growth regulator from endophytic actinobacteria (Khamna et al., 2010; Palaniyandi et al., 2013). Endophytic Streptomyces strains producing IAA significantly improved the growth of tomato plants (Verma et al., 2011). There are reports suggesting that the endophytic actinobacteria isolated from one plant could promote growth of the other plants. For instance, rhizospheric endophytic actinobacteria of Yam plant of Yeoju, South Korea, enhanced the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana by producing IAA, phosphate solubilization, and prominent 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity (Palaniyandi et al., 2013). However, some of the studies suggested that there is negative impact of IAA as it has been verified as one of the virulence factors in some phytpathogenic actinobacteria (Vandeputte et al., 2005). Endophytic actinobacteria of wheat crop, for example, S. olivaceoviridis, S. rimosus and S. rochei produced auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinin-like substances that positively influenced plant growth (Aldesuquy et al., 1998). It has been suggested that formulations of endophytic actinobacteria can be a potential step to promote sustainable agriculture (Hasegawa et al., 2006; Palaniyandi et al., 2013). Plant growth promoters, Pteridic acids A and B, isolated from endophytic S. hygroscopicus TP-A045 had auxin-like activity and helped in the improved formation of adventitious root in hypocotyls of kidney beans. They showed potency comparable to the auxins (Igarashi et al., 2002). Another Streptomyces sp. MBR-52 also augmented the emergence and elongation of plant adventitious roots (Hasegawa et al., 2006; Meguro et al., 2006). Ethylene a phytohormone is responsible for the physiological responses to both abiotic and biotic environmental stresses to plants (Sun et al., 2006). Extreme physiological conditions like temperature, drought and salinity can induce the production of ethylene. Endophytic actinobacteria residing in such plants might lessen the negative impact of stress by production of enzyme ACC deaminase. This enzyme hydrolyzes 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) and hence decreases the ethylene production in plants. In some studies, it is also reported that this enzyme is capable of hydrolyzing ACC into a-ketobutyrate and ammonia, and provide nitrogen to the microorganisms for their growth (Viterbo et al., 2010; Xing et al., 2012).

Phosphorus is one of the essential elements for plants necessary for various biological processes like transport of glucose, stimulation of cell proliferation and promotion of organ development (Ahemad and Kibret, 2014). But the phosphorus available in the soil is not accessible to plants directly (Ezawa et al., 2002). Endophytic actinobacteria play important role in solubilization of phosphates and enhance its availability to plants by means of acidification, chelation, redox changes and mineralization of organic phosphorus (Nautiyal et al., 2000; Van der Hiejden et al., 2008). Phosphate solubilization activity along with the phytase secretion was reported from endophytic Streptomyces sp. isolated from Triticum aestivum plant. It has shown significant plant growth improvement (Jog et al., 2014).

Besides phosphorus, iron also plays an imperative role in the physiological processes and enzymatic activities in plants (Bothwell, 1995). For iron to be taken up by plants, it needs to be solubilised. The availability of iron to plant roots was enhanced by siderophores produced by microorganisms in the form of bacterial siderophore-iron complex, or phytosiderophore-iron complex (Rajkumar et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2011). S. acidiscabies E13 being an excellent producer of siderophore, promotes the growth of Vigna unguiculata under nickel stress conditions (Dimkpa et al., 2009; Sessitsch et al., 2013). In a recent study on the community of endophytic actinobacteria of New Zealand native medicinal plant Pseudowintera colorata (Horopito), Streptomyces sp. UKCW/B and Nocardia sp. TP1BA1B were found to solubilise phosphate and produce siderophores (Purushotham et al., 2018).

Some reports had shown direct benefits of endophyte on plants by tissue culture. For example, inoculation of halophytic plants with plant growth-promoting (PGP) actinobacteria was reported for the improvement of salt tolerance in plants (Qin et al., 2017). Streptomyces coelicolor (MAR1), an endophyte isolated from mangrove plants of Pichavaram, Tamilnadu (India) was reported to be active against various bacterial and fungal pathogens. It was also tolerant for high salt concentration and high pH (Gayathri and Muralikrishnan, 2013).

The endophytic actinobacteria also possess the ability to produce growth inhibitors in order to improve health of the host-plants. Some herbicidal compounds had been reported from the endophytic actinobacteria. Herbicidin H isolated from Streptomyces sp. SANK 63997, an endophyte of Setaria viridis var. pachystachys, gamma-glutamylmethionine sulfoximine from Microbispora sp. residing in Carex kobomugi are some of the examples of herbicides of endophytic origin (Okazaki, 2003). A plant growth inhibitor was isolated from actinobacteria Dactylosporangium sp. of Cucubalus sp. found to inhibit germination of Brassica rapa (Furumai et al., 2003). Clethramycin, a pollen tube growth inhibitor extracted from the fermentation broth of S. hygroscopicus, was isolated from the roots of Clethra barbinervis. This metabolite has mode of action similar to inhibition of MAP kinase by staurosporine and herbimycin (Igarashi et al., 2003). Endophenazines A-D, produced by S. anulatus possessed herbicidal activity against Lemna minor (Gebhardt et al., 2002).

Besides these beneficial properties, a few phytotoxins have also been reported from the endophytic actinobacteria (Berdy, 2012), but majorly, they play beneficial roles. Thus, it can be safely summed up that there is enormous potential for application of endophytic actinobacteria in agriculture. Some more studies of plant growth promotion by endophytic actinobacteria are reported in Table 5.

Table 5.

Plant growth promoting activities of endophytic actinobacteria.

Plant growth promotion
Plant growth promoting factor	Endphytic actinobacteria	Plant source	References
Nitrogen Fixation	Actinomycetes strains Dll, G2	Casuarina equisetifolia	Gauthier et al., 1981
IAA and siderophore	Streptomyces sp. CMU-PA101 and Streptomyces sp. CMU-SK126	Curcuma mangga	Khamna et al., 2009
Solubilization of phosphate, production of phytase, chitinase, IAA, siderophore and malate	Streptomyces sp. mhcr0816, mhce0811	Triticum aestivum	Jog et al., 2014
Production of IAA and ACC deaminase	Actinoplanes campanulatus, Micromonospora chalcea, Streptomyces spiralis	Cucumis sativus	El-Tarabily et al., 2010
Production of IAA	Streptomyces sp. PT2	Plants of Algerian Sahara	Goudjal et al., 2013
Production of chitinase, phosphatase and siderophore	Streptomyces sp. AB131-1, LBR02	Isolates of Microbiology Laboratory, Bogor Agricultural University	Hastuti et al., 2012
Production of rooting-promoting plant hormones	Streptomyces sp. MBR-52	Rhododendron ferrugineum	Meguro et al., 2006
Solubilization of phosphate, production of siderophores, HCN, ammonia, production of chitinase and IAA	Streptomyces sp. BPSAC34, Leifsonia xyli BPSAC24, Microbacterium sp. BPSAC 21, 27, 28 and 29	Medicinal plants	Passari et al., 2015b
IAA	Streptomyces sp., Nocardia sp., Nocardiopsis sp., Spirillospora sp., Microbispora sp. and Micromonospora sp.	Citrus reticulata	Shutsrirung et al., 2013
Siderophores	Streptomyces sp. GMKU 3100	Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105	Rungin et al., 2012
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), hydroxamate and catechol type siderophore, protease	Streptomyces sp. S4202, Nonomuraea sp. S3304, Actinomadura sp. S4215, Pseudonocardia sp. S4201	Aquilaria crassna	Nimnoi et al., 2010
Glucoamylase	Streptosporangium sp. L21	Zea mays	De Araujo et al., 2000; Stamford et al., 2002
Cell wall degrading enzymes	Streptomyces galbus R-5	Rhododendron seedlings	Minamiyama et al., 2003
Endo- chitinase enzymes	Streptomyces violaceusniger XL- 2	Trees of Dehradun	Shekhar et al., 2006
IAA, siderophore production, Phosphate solubilisation	Streptomyces sp. R18(6)	Lycopersicon esculentum	De Oliveira et al., 2010
Homoserine lactone degrading enzymes	Streptomyces sp. LPC026, LPC029, PC005, PC052, and PC053	Garuga pinnata, Gmelina arborea, Stephania venosa, Melastoma malabathricum, Merremia vitifolia	Chankhamhaengdecha et al., 2013
Herbicidin H (herbicide)	Streptomyces sp. strain SANK 63997	Setaria viridis var. pachystachys	Okazaki, 2003
Cellulase, Xylanase, Lignolytic activity	Nocardiopsis sp. ac9, Streptomyces, Violaceorubidus 6ca11, Streptomyces sp. ac19	Elaeis guineensis Jacq.	Ting et al., 2014
Phosphate solubilisation and seiderophore production	Streptomyces sp. UKCW/B, Nocardia sp. TP1BA1B	Pseudowintera colorata	Purushotham et al., 2018

Environmental applications of endophytic actinobacteria

Some endophytic actinobacteria isolated from the plant, Salix caprea, were reported to release metal binding secondary metabolites that mobilize zinc (Zn) and cadmium (Cd) from the soil, enhancing their accumulation in the leaves of this plant (Kuffner et al., 2010). In another study involving the endophyte S. tendae from sunflower plant, it was reported to mediate phytoremediation of Cd (Dimkpa et al., 2009). These studies have clearly established the potential of endophytic actinobacteria in removal of heavy metals from the soil and their increased uptake by plants growing in the metal-contaminated soil. A combinatorial study of plants and their endophytes can be explored for their application in remediation of heavy metals from contaminated soil sites and consequent improvement in soil health.

A few reports on the potential application of endophytic actinobacteria in pesticide bioremediation have also appeared. Chlordane, pesticide banned due to its adverse effect on human health and environment, was successfully removed by using a mixed culture of actinobacteria. It was shown that the mixed culture produced bioemulsifiers that facilitated bioavailability and uptake of the pesticide (Fuentes et al., 2017).

Endophytic Streptomyces sp. had been reported in improving phytoremediation efficiency of petroleum contaminated soil by their petroleum degradation ability (Baoune et al., 2017). Significant biosurfactant and biodegradation activities had been reported from the endophyte Nocardia sp. A9. Furthermore, it was able to degrade plastic and petroleum by 22 and 10% on weight loss basis respectively (Singh and Sedhuraman, 2015).

Conclusions and future perspectives

Microbes and plants are keys to sustenance of life on the planet earth. They are the drivers of natural processes, like biogeochemical cycles, maintenance of various ecological habitats (supporting specific flora and fauna under such special niches), production of oxygen, utilization of carbon dioxide, production of organic compounds used as food, feed, and medicine. These naturally thriving and beautifully maintained biosystems have come under serious threat due to deleterious consequences of rampant industrialization and unthoughtful use of myriad of chemicals for human, animal, and agriculture purposes. These problems have drawn attention of the researchers to find appropriate solutions. It is during such endeavors that we are learning more about various biotic and abiotic factors, which interact in a very rationale and scientific manner to balance and sustain each other. Endophytic actinobacteria and their host plants provide an exciting model to explore and to understand their biology and chemistry to develop suitable, non-deleterious applications for human health, agriculture and environment.

While the genus Streptomyces had been reported to be the most abundant, the non-Streptomyces category was also frequently reported in the endophyte of various categories of plants from extreme habitats (Table 1). The biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) of these isolates are largely unexplored. But significant diversity in chemical classes was evident from the reports summarized in Tables 2, 3. The therapeutic properties of these compounds strongly suggested abudance of potentially novel drug molecules in the expansive chemical repertoire of endophytic actinobacteria. The data presented in Tables 4, 5 demonstrated important roles of endophytic actinobacteria in plant protection and growth, thereby their significance in agriculture.

From the studies analyzed in this review, it is evident that the plants from the extreme environments are potential source for novel and widely diverse endophytic actinobacteria. While these natural reservoirs remain largely untapped as of now, they seem to be drawing considerable attention of the scientific community in present times. Furthermore, progress in endophytic actinobacterial diversity will depend on the advancements in tools and technology for both culturable and non-culturable approaches. This would enhance the repertoire of culturable endophytic actinobacteria from the special habitats besides expanding the information on non-culturable forms. Advancement in the genomic science and technology can be expected to offer rapid means to establish the endophytic actinobacterial diversity in extreme habitats and to indentify potentially useful strains based on the detection of BGCs or other genetic determinants.

Due to multiple drug resistant (MDR) and extensive drug resistant (XDR) pathogens on the scene and the problems associated with the treatment and management of the diseases caused by “ESKAPE” pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pnumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), the need for discovery and development of novel drugs is more urgent than ever before. The diverse and novel endophytic actinobacteria from the special habitats offer unparallel opportunities for mining drugs and therapeutics. Besides application in medicine, the novel bioactive molecules may be useful for agriculture purposes for their ability to promote plant growth; ward off phytopathogens, insects and pests; enhance nutrient uptake and help maintain crop productivity under severe abiotic stress of salinity, draft and water logging. Also, these endophytic actinobacteria may play crucial roles in maintenance and sustenance of specific natural habitats but these endeavors call upon extensive scientific investigation to develop the necessary knowledge base.

It can thus be summed up that the novelty and the diversity of the endophytic actinobacterial strains and their bioactive molecules offer tremendous opportunities to address the current and future needs in medicine, agriculture, and environment.

Author contributions

RS: collection of literature, preparation of the initial draft, support during course of preparation of the article. AD: structure and content of the review, correction of the initial draft, writing, and revisiion of the final version.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.