Abstract
In this study, we investigated IL-10 and IL-17 specific immunomodulatory potential of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a physiological nitric oxide carrier molecule, in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In active EAE model, GSNO treatment attenuated EAE severity and splenic CD4+ T cells isolated from these mice exhibited decreased IL-17 expression without affecting the IFN-γ expression compared to the cells from untreated EAE mice. Similarly, adoptive transfer of these cells to nave mice resulted in reduction in IL-17 expression in the spinal cords of recipient mice with milder EAE severity. CD4+ T cells isolated from GSNO treated EAE mice, as compared to untreated EAE mice, still expressed lower levels of IL-17 under TH17 skewing conditions, but expressed similar levels of IFN-γ under TH1 skewing condition. Interestingly, under both TH17 and TH1 skewing condition, CD4+ T cells isolated from GSNO treated EAE mice, as compared to untreated EAE mice, expressed higher levels of IL-10 and adoptive transfer of these TH17 and TH1 skewed cells seemingly exhibited milder EAE disease. In addition, adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice to active EAE mice also ameliorated EAE disease with induction of spinal cord expression of IL-10 and reduction in of IL-17, thus suggesting the participation of IL-10 mechanism in GSNO mediated immunomodulation. GSNO treatment of mice passively immunized with CD4+ T cells either from GSNO treated EAE mice or untreated mice further ameliorated EAE disease, supporting efficacy of GSNO for prophylaxis and therapy in EAE. Overall, these data document a modulatory role of GSNO in IL-17/IL-10 axis of EAE and other autoimmune diseases.
Keywords: Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), IL-10, IL-17, S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), TH1, TH17, adoptive transfer
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction
Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a CD4+ T helper (TH) cell mediated autoimmune disease of central nervous system (CNS) that serves as an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS) [20]. The disease is characterized by differentiation and expansion of myelin specific immune cells, their infiltration into the CNS, and chronic encephalitogenic inflammation leading to damage to myelin, oligodendrocytes, and axons [4]. Earlier, IFN-γ producing TH1 cells were believed to be solely responsible for the initiation and progression of MS and EAE [19, 27]. However, there is now a general consensus that IL-17 producing T cells (TH17) are also involved in the onset and progression of EAE [7, 16, 18]. Moreover, recent studies have also described an important role for IL-10 producing regulatory T cells (Tregs) in regulation TH1 and TH17 mediated immune responses in EAE disease [9, 11].
There is a growing body of evidence that nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in regulation of cellular processes involved in immune and inflammatory responses [2]. Cellular NO is synthesized by three distinct forms of NO synthases (NOS): neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), and endothelial NOS (eNOS) [10]. NO is reported to play an inhibitory role in differentiation of TH17 cells and their release of IL-17 [12, 22]. Accordingly, genetic ablation of iNOS (but not nNOS and eNOS) increased the severity of EAE disease via inducing TH17 cells [12]. NO was also reported to induce a specific subset of Treg cells, called NO-Treg, that reduce EAE disease via inducing the release of IL-10 [23].
At the molecular level, NO exerts its physiological activities by interacting with and modulating the activities of enzymes containing iron-sulfur centers (e.g. guanylyl cyclase) [5] and/or by secondary modification of protein thiols directly or by low-molecular-weight-nitrosothiol mediated trans-S-nitrosylation [29]. S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), the most abundant cellular low-molecular-weight-nitrosothiol, is formed by a redox based reaction between NO and glutathione (GSH) [29]. GSNO has been identified as a potential carrier and reservoir of NO [29] and is known to inhibit platelet activation [8] and inflammatory processes [24, 25], and is also reported to induce cardiovascular protection [17].
We previously evaluated the immuno-modulatory efficacy of GSNO in different EAE models and reported prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of GSNO against the clinical disease of EAE [22, 26]. GSNO inhibited the IL-6-induced STAT3 activation (Tyr705 phosphorylation) by S-nitrosylation of the STAT3 protein on Cys259 [14] and also downregulated the IL-6 and TGF-β induced expression of RORγt, a TH17 cell specific transcription factor [22]. Additionally, GSNO treatment also inhibited the TH17 cell polarization induced by IL-6 and TGF-β and their effector function induced by IL-23 in in vitro cell culture conditions, but without significant changes in TH1 (IFN-γ) and TH2 (IL-4) immune responses, suggesting GSNO as a potential TH17 specific immune-modulatory agent under EAE conditions [22]. Previous studies from our laboratory and others have described that GSNO directly modulates the activities of proinflammatory transcription factors, such as NF-κΒ, AP-1, and STAT3 [6, 26, 31] and thus modulates gene expression for various proinflammatory effectors, such as iNOS, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 [6, 13, 15, 26, 31]. It is also of interest to note that some of these transcription factors (e.g. NF-κΒ and AP-1) play a role in IL-17 mediated proinflammatory processes [30]. These studies, therefore, indicate that GSNO-mediated mechanisms effectively modulate both differentiation and effector function of TH17 cells and thus suggest its potential for prophylactic and therapeutic intervention of EAE and other autoimmune diseases.
In this study, we report that GSNO modulates autoimmune responses in EAE by specifically targeting the TH17 cells and by inducing IL-10 expression. This conclusion is supported by 1) splenic CD4+ T cells isolated from GSNO treated EAE animals expressed lower levels of IL-17, while did not exhibited any difference in IFN-γ expression compared to the cells from untreated EAE animals; accordingly, adoptive transfer of these cells to naïve mice exhibits milder disease with lesser expression of IL-17 in the spinal cord; 2) CD4+ T cells from GSNO treated EAE animals express higher levels of IL-10 under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions, than the cells from untreated EAE animals, and adoptive transfer of both TH1 and TH17 skewed cells exhibited milder EAE disease; 3) Adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice to active EAE mice ameliorated active EAE disease with induction of spinal cord expression of IL-10 and reduction in of IL-17; 4) GSNO treatment of mice passively immunized with CD4+ T cells either from GSNO treated EAE mice or untreated mice further ameliorated EAE disease.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Mice
Female SJL and C57BL/6 mice, purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), were housed in the animal care facility of Medical University of South Carolina and received standard laboratory food and water ad libitum. Paralyzed mice were provided with Transgel (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) as an alternate food/water source. All animal protocols were in accordance with the animal experiment guidelines of the Medical University of South Carolina and National Institute of Health and accepted by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Medical University of South Carolina (Approved number: AR#1644).
2.2. Induction of EAE disease
EAE disease was induced in 8- to 12-week-old female SJL or C57BL/6 mice by immunization with proteolipid protein peptide (PLP139–151; Peptide International, Louisville, KY) or MOG35–55 peptide (MOG35–55; 200ug; Peptide International) emulsified (1:1) in 100ul complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) on day 0 and day 7. Additionally, 300 ng of Pertussis toxin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) was given on day 0 and day 2 by i.p. injection. Pertussis toxin used as per the standardized protocol reported by us and other investigators for the induction of EAE [21]. On the day of immunization, one group of mice received 100 μl phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the second group of mice received daily GSNO (1.0 mg/kg, 100 μΙ/PBS) via oral route. GSNO was purchased from World Precision Instruments (Sarasota, FL) and its concentration was adjusted spectrophotometrically at 334 nm. Individual animals were observed daily for clinical disease severity by an investigator, blinded to experimental treatments, on a 0–5 scale as follows: 0 = no abnormality; 1 = piloerection, sluggish, 2 = limp tail; 2.5 = hind limb weakness (legs slip through cage top); 3 = hind limb paralysis; 4 = hind and forelimb paralysis; and 5 = moribund [22].
2.3. Ex vivo culture of T cells and characterization of CD4+ T cell lineages
At the peak of EAE disease, the mice were sacrificed and CD4+ T cells were purified from spleens by CD4+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi, Auburn, CA). The purified T cells (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were cultured in 96-well round-bottom microculture plates (Falcon Labware, Oxnard, CA) in RPMI-complete media containing RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), 10% FBS, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and penicillin (Atlanta Biologicals Norcross, GA), 1 mM glutamine, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, and 50 μΜ 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich).
For skewing of different CD4+ T cell subsets and their expansion, the isolated CD4+ T cells were stimulated with PLP139–151 (5 μg/ml) with IL-2 (10ng/ml) for TH0, IL-2 (10ng/ml), rhlL12p35 (10ng/ml), and anti-IL-4 (1μg/ml) for TH1, or rmlL12/23p40 homodimer (10ng/ml), anti-IFN-γ 1(μg/ml), anti-IL-4 (1 μg/ml) for TH17. All cytokines and antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Following stimulation, the cells were harvested for adoptive transfer of EAE disease and the culture supernatants were collected for analysis of IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-10 expression by ELISA (BioLegend Cat# 430802, 432505, and 431411; San Diego, CA).
2.4. Adoptive transfer model of EAE
Cultured T cells (20–30×106 T cells in 300 μl RPMI media per mouse) were injected to naïve female SJL or C57BL/6 mice (8–12 week old) via intraperitoneal route. The recipient mice were also given two doses of pertussis toxin (200ng/300 μl of PBS/i.p.) on day 0 and 2 of post immunization. Clinical EAE disease was measured as described above.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Clinical disease scores are presented as average maximal scores over the treatment period (mean + SD) and analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Statistics for proliferation and cytokine responses were analyzed with a one-way multiple-range analysis of variance (ANOVA). All analyses were conducted using Graph Pad Prism 3.0 software. Significances (p-value) between groups were determined using the Newman-Keul test. A value of p<0.05* and above was considered significant.
3. Results and discussion
Previously, we reported prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of GSNO in chronic (C57BL/6 mice immunized with MOG35–55) and relapsing-remitting models (SJL mice immunized with PLP139–151) of active EAE [22]. In both models, GSNO was reported to attenuate the EAE disease by inhibiting STAT3/RORγt and thus TH17 specific immune responses, but without altering TH1 (STAT4/T-bet) and TH2 (STAT6/GATA3) specific immune responses. Moreover, in ex vivo and in vitro T cell culture studies, GSNO treatment specifically inhibited IL-6 and TGF-ß induced polarization and expansion of TH17 cells and their effector function (IL-17 production) induced by IL-23 [22], suggesting a role for GSNO mediated mechanisms in modulation of differentiation, expansion, and effector functions of TH17 cells. Recently, we further reported the effect of GSNO as well as N6022 (an inhibitor of GSNO degrading enzyme GSNO-reductase) in induction of IL-10 via inducing CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3− specific subset of regulatory T (Treg) cells [28]. At present, however, the role of Treg/IL-10 in IL-17/TH17 mediated immuno-pathobiology in EAE is not well understood.
In the present study, we provide further evidence supporting the role of GSNO in inhibition of TH17 cell differentiation and effector function by using murine passive-immunization model of EAE. Using this model, we investigated the regulatory role of GSNO in differentiation and effector functions of T cells associated with EAE disease. SJL mice were immunized with PLP139–151 peptide and treated with 1.0 mg/kg GSNO (denoted as “GSNO+EAE group” hereafter) or the same volume of PBS (denoted as “EAE group” hereafter) daily starting on the day of immunization. At the peak of EAE disease (~ day 10 post immunization), CD4+ T cells were isolated from the spleens of the mice in both groups (EAE and GSNO+EAE). The isolated T cells were cultured in ex vivo in the presence or absence of PLP139–151 peptide, then, lineage specific activation of T cells (TH17 vs. TH1) was analyzed for media levels of TH1 (IFN-γ) and TH17 (IL-17) cytokines. Figure 1A shows that T cells isolated from the EAE group or GSNO+EAE group produced comparable levels of IFN-γ in response to PLP139–151 stimulation. However, T cells isolated from GSNO+EAE group produced significantly lower levels of IL-17 as compared to those from T cells isolated from the EAE group.
Fig. 1. Effect of adoptive transfer of T cells isolated from EAE or GSNO treated EAE mice in development of passive EAE disease.

PLP139–151 specific T cells isolated from spleens and lymph-nodes of EAE mice or GSNO treated EAE mice were cultured ex vivo and re-stimulated with PLP139–151 (10μg/ml) under TH0 condition (IL-2). A. For characterization of TH1 vs. TH17 differentiation, the media from cultured CD4+ cells from GSNO treated and untreated EAE mice were analyzed for IFN-γ or IL-17. B. The cultured T cells stimulated with PLP139–151 were adoptively transferred to the naïve host SJL mice and the development of passive EAE disease was monitored daily by blinded investigators. C. At the peak of EAE disease, T cells were isolated from the spinal cord and release of IFN-γ and IL-17 were analyzed by ELISA in the presence or absence of ex vivo PLP139–151 stimulation.
To evaluate the role of GSNO-mediated mechanisms in immune responses of EAE, ex vivo cultured T cells were re-stimulated with PLP139–151 peptide and then adoptively transferred to naïve SJL mice as passive immunization. Development of EAE disease was assessed by daily evaluation of mean clinical score. Figure 1B shows that the mice passively immunized with T cells from GSNO+EAE group exhibited significantly delayed and milder disease than the mice passively immunized with T cells from EAE group. Next, TH17 vs TH1 lineage specific expressions of IL-17 vs. IFN-γ were investigated in spinal cords of the passively immunized EAE mice. Figures 1C shows that the mice passively immunized with T cells from EAE group and GSNO+EAE group expressed comparable levels of IFN-γ in the spinal cords. However, the mice passively immunized with T cells from GSNO+EAE group expressed significantly lower levels of IL-17 than the mice passively immunized with T cells from EAE group (Fig. 1C). These data, along with the data from actively-immunized EAE model [22], indicate that GSNO mediated attenuation of EAE disease is mediated via modulation of TH17 differentiation without altering the TH1 lineage cell function (IFN-γ).
To further evaluate the role of GSNO in lineage specific inhibition of TH1 vs. TH17 differentiation during the immunization, T cells isolated from EAE or GSNO+EAE group of mice were skewed under TH1 (IL-2, rhlL-12p35, and anti-IL-4) or TH17 (IL-2, rhlL-12/23p40, anti-IFN-γ 1, and anti-IL-4) cytokine conditions for lineage specific expansion in the presence or absence of PLP139–151 peptide. Figure 2A-i shows that T cells isolated from EAE and GSNO+EAE groups produced comparable amounts of IFN-γ, but not lL-17 under TH1 skewing conditions. On the other hand, T cells isolated from EAE group produced higher levels of IL-17 than T cells isolated from GSNO+EAE group under TH17 skewing conditions, while T cells from both groups did not produce any IFN-γ under the same TH17 skewing conditions (Fig. 2B-i). T cells isolated from both EAE and GSNO+EAE groups produced similarly increased levels of GM-CSF, a non-lineage specific cytokine, under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions (Figs. 2A-i and B-i). Again, these data indicate a lineage specific inhibitory action of GSNO on TH17 differentiation during the development of EAE disease. Interestingly, T cells isolated from GSNO+EAE group produced significantly higher amounts of IL-10 than the T cells isolated from EAE group under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions (Figs. 2A-i and B-i). Accordingly, adoptive transfer of both TH1 and TH17 skewed T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice expressing high levels of IL-10, as compared to T cells from untreated EAE mice, produced significantly milder EAE disease (Figs. 2A-ii and 2B-ii). IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine and its potential on the attenuation of EAE disease was shown in transgenic mice expressing IL-10 in T cells [1]. Therefore, this study, for the first time, reports the role of GSNO-mediated mechanisms in induction of I L-10 expression under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions and its potential participation in attenuation of EAE disease. IL-10 is known to inhibit immune responses mediated by both TH1 and TH17 cells [9, 11]. Therefore, GSNO-induced IL-10 production under TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions should inhibit effector functions of both TH1 and TH17 cells. However, GSNO inhibited only TH17 pathway without affecting TH1 pathway (Figs. 2A-i and B-i) and the underlying mechanism for GSNO mediated selective inhibition of TH17 is not well understood at present.
Fig. 2. Development of passive EAE disease by adoptive transfer of TH1 or TH17 skewed T cells isolated from GSNO treated or untreated EAE mice.

T cells isolated from spleens and lymph-nodes of GSNO treated or untreated EAE mice were cultured under TH1 (IL12p35, anti-IL-4, and anti-IL-17) (A) or Τη17 (IL12/23p40) (B) skewing conditions in the presence or absence of PLP139–151 peptide. Then, release of IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-10, and GM-CSF were analyzed by ELISA (A-i and B-i). TH1 and TH17 skewed T cells were then adoptively transferred to naïve host mice to induce passive EAE disease and clinical disease scores were analyzed daily as described experimental procedure (A-ii and B-ii).
NO induced IL-10 production via induction of specific lineage of regulatory T (Treg) cells was described previously [23]. These cells expressed cell surface markers for Treg (e.g. CD4 and CD25) but not FOXP3 and thus are distinguished from neutral and inducible Tregs (nTreg and iTreg; CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3+). In addition, these cells are different from Tr1 (CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3−) in that the induction of these is IL-10-independent [23]. These NO-inducible CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3− cells, coined as ‘NO-Treg’, had a potent immunomodulatory effect by producing anti-inflammatory IL-10 in the active EAE mouse model [23]. According to this report, GSNO-mediated mechanisms may contribute to inhibition of TH17 immune response and EAE disease via inducing NO-Treg [23]. However, the observed induction of high levels of IL-10 by T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions (Figs. 2A-i and B-i) documents the role of TH1/TH17 cell produced IL-10 in immunomodulation of EAE.
Next, we investigated immunomodulatory role of GSNO treated T cells in active EAE disease. For it, CD4+ T cells were isolated from MOG35–55 imunized C57BL/6 mice, which were treated with GSNO (1mg/kg/day) starting on the day of disease onset (day14 post-immunization) and then adoptively transferred to active EAE mice on the day of disease onset (day14 post-immunization). Fig. 3A show that adoptive transfer of GSNO-treated CD4+ T cells (denoted as “GSNO-TH” hereafter) to active EAE mice significantly attenuated the clinical signs of EAE disease. In addition, active EAE mice treated with GSNO-TH cells, as compared to untreated active EAE mice, expressed higher levels of IL-10, lower levels of IL-17, and comparable levels of IFN-in spinal cords (Fig. 3B). Previous study reported that NO inhibits TH17 response via inducing IL-10 production by activation of specific subset of CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3− regulatory T cells, namely NO-Treg [23]. Recently, we also reported that treatment of EAE mice with GSNO or N6022, an inhibitor of GSNO catabolizing enzyme (GSNO reductase), also attenuated EAE disease via inducing IL-10 production by CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3− T cells [28]. Therefore, we expect that IL-10 pathway plays critical role in TH17 specific immunomodulation by GSNO treatment.
Fig. 3. Immuno-modulatory role of GSNO treated CD4+ T cells in active EAE disease. A.

MOG35–55 immunized EAE mice were treated with daily GSNO (Img/kg/day/i.p.) starting at the day of disease onset (day 14) and CD4+ TH cells were isolated from spleen at the peak of disease. The isolated CD4+ TH cells were adoptively transferred to MOG35–55 immunized active EAE mice at the day of disease onset and then clinical score of each mice was evaluated as described in Materials and Methods. B. At the peak of disease, expressions of IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-10 were analyzed in the spinal cords of EAE mice.
GSNO is known for its anti-inflammatory activity in various disease conditions (see review [6]). Under EAE conditions, GSNO was reported to inhibit CNS infiltration of peripheral immune cells via inhibiting endothelial expression of proinflammatory adhesion molecules (e.g. ICAM and VCAM) [26]. At molecular levels, GSNO is known to inhibit activities of a series of transcription factors (e.g. NF-κΒ, AP-1, CREB, and STAT3) via S-nitrosylation mechanisms [6, 26, 31]. It is of interest to note that some of these transcription factors also play critical roles in IL-23 mediated TH17 effector function (e.g. STAT3) [3] as well as IL-17 mediated inflammatory reaction (e.g. NF-kB and AP-1) [30]. Therefore, GSNO may exert its efficacy on EAE disease not only via regulating the T cell differentiation, but also via regulating effector functions of polarized T cells and thus neuroinflammation. To further investigate the efficacy of GSNO on the TH17 cell effector function in EAE disease, SJL naïve mice were passively immunized by adoptive transfer of T cells isolated from EAE or GSNO+EAE group and further received daily GSNO treatment during the course of the disease (Fig. 4A). Figure 4B shows that passive immunized mice with the T cells isolated from GSNO treated EAE mice, but without receiving GSNO during the disease, exhibited milder disease (solid triangles) and the disease severity was further reduced when these mice were treated with GSNO during the disease (cross markers). On the other hand, passive immunized mice with T cells from untreated EAE mice exhibited the severest EAE disease (solid diamonds) and GSNO treatment of these mice during the disease also reduced the EAE disease (blank squares). These observations indicate that GSNO-mediated modulation of T cell differentiation as well as T cell effector function participate in attenuation of EAE disease.
Fig. 4. Effect of GSNO treatment in T cell differentiation and effector function in adoptive transfer EAE disease.

The PLP-immunized T cells from spleens and lymph-nodes of EAE mice or GSNO treated EAE mice were transferred to naïve SJL mice. On the day of passive immunization, the recipient mice were further treated vehicle (saline) or GSNO during the course of the disease (A). Following immunization, the severity of EAE disease was analyzed as described in materials and methods (B). Each group denotes saline treated recipient mice immunized with T cells from saline treated EAE mice (line with sold diamonds), GSNO treated recipient mice immunized with T cells from saline treated EAE mice (line with open squares), (c) saline treated recipient mice immunized with T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice (line with solid triangles), or GSNO treated recipient mice immunized with T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice (line with cross marks).
5. Conclusions
TH1/IFN-y and TH17/IL-17 cells are primary effector T cells and cytokines involved in immune pathogenesis of EAE and MS. We previous reported role of GSNO-mediated mechanism in inhibition of TH17 and induction of Treg [22][28]. In this study, we further reports the role of GSNO in induction of IL-10 and its specific function on TH17 cell mediated autoimmune response in EAE. Under ex vivo conditions, splenic CD4+ T cells isolated from GSNO treated EAE mice exhibited decreased TH17 response (IL-17) with unaltered TH1 response (IFN-γ) even under TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions. Interestingly, CD4+ T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice under both TH1 and TH17 skewing conditions express higher levels of IL-10, as compared to the cells from untreated EAE mice, and adoptive transfer of these cells to naïve mice resulted in milder disease, suggesting the role of IL-10 in modulation of EAE disease. Moreover, adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells from GSNO treated EAE mice to active EAE disease also resulted in amelioration of disease severity of active EAE mice with induction of IL-10 and reduction of IL-17, but without affecting IFN-γ. These data suggest that GSNO/IL-10 mechanism is specific to TH17 (IL-17), but not TH1/IFN-y, mediated immune pathogenesis of EAE.
In summary, we report, for the first time, that the GSNO mediated mechanisms induce expression of IL-10 by TH1 and TH17 polarized cells and that adoptive transfer of these cells, producing IL-10, to naïve mice or active EAE mice produces milder disease. The observed findings using EAE adoptive transfer model indicate that GSNO-mediated mechanisms in TH1 or TH17 cells downregulate the immune activity of these cell types by acquiring expression of IL-10 in addition to their respective signature cytokines (IFN-y/TH1 or IL-17/TH17).
Highlights.
GSNO selectively inhibits TH17, but not IFN-γ, mediated immune pathogenesis of EAE.
GSNO induces IL-10 expression of both TH1 and TH17 skewed autoreactive T cells.
Adoptive transfer of both GSNO treated TH1 and TH17 skewed cells resulted in milder EAE.
Transfer of CD4+ T cells from GSNO-EAE mice to active EAE also alleviates EAE disease.
GSNO has prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy against T cell mediated EAE disease.
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge Ms. Joyce Bryan for their help in procurement of animals and supplies. This work was supported by U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (BX002829) and National Institutes of Health (NS037766)
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
We confirm there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced the outcome.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Bettelli E, Das MP, Howard ED, Weiner HL, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK, IL-10 is critical in the regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis as demonstrated by studies of IL-10- and IL-4-deficient and transgenic mice, J Immunol 161 (1998) 3299–3306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Bogdan C, Nitric oxide and the immune response, Nat Immunol 2 (2001) 907–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Cho JH, The genetics and immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, Nat Rev Immunol 8 (2008) 458–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Compston A, Coles A, Multiple sclerosis, Lancet 359 (2002) 1221–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cooper CE, Nitric oxide and iron proteins, Biochimica et biophysica acta 1411 (1999) 290–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Corti A, Franzini M, Scataglini I, Pompella A, Mechanisms and targets of the modulatory action of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) on inflammatory cytokines expression, Arch Biochem Biophys 562 (2014) 80–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Cua DJ, Sherlock J, Chen Y, Murphy CA, Joyce B, Seymour B, Lucian L, To W, Kwan S, Churakova T, Zurawski S, Wiekowski M, Lira SA, Gorman D, Kastelein RA, Sedgwick JD, Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain, Nature 421 (2003) 744–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].de Belder AJ, MacAllister R, Radomski MW, Moncada S, Vallance PJ, Effects of S-nitroso-glutathione in the human forearm circulation: evidence for selective inhibition of platelet activation, Cardiovasc Res 28 (1994) 691–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Fiorentino DF, Zlotnik A, Vieira P, Mosmann TR, Howard M, Moore KW, O’Garra A, IL-10 acts on the antigen-presenting cell to inhibit cytokine production by Th1 cells, J Immunol 146 (1991) 3444–3451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Griffith OW, Stuehr DJ, Nitric oxide synthases: properties and catalytic mechanism, Annu Rev Physiol 57 (1995) 707–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Huber S, Gagliani N, Esplugues E, O’Connor W Jr., Huber FJ, Chaudhry A, Kamanaka M, Kobayashi Y, Booth CJ, Rudensky AY, Roncarolo MG, Battaglia M, Flavell RA, Th17 cells express interleukin-10 receptor and are controlled by Foxp3(−) and Foxp3+ regulatory CD4+ T cells in an interleukin-10-dependent manner, Immunity 34 (2011) 554–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Jianjun Y, Zhang R, Lu G, Shen Y, Peng L, Zhu C, Cui M, Wang W, Arnaboldi P, Tang M, Gupta M, Qi CF, Jayaraman P, Zhu H, Jiang B, Chen SH, He JC, Ting AT, Zhou MM, Kuchroo VK, Morse HC 3rd, Ozato K, Sikora AG, Xiong H, T cell-derived inducible nitric oxide synthase switches off Th17 cell differentiation, J Exp Med 210 (2013) 1447–1462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Khan M, Sekhon B, Giri S, Jatana M, Gilg AG, Ayasolla K, Elango C, Singh AK, Singh I, S-Nitrosoglutathione reduces inflammation and protects brain against focal cerebral ischemia in a rat model of experimental stroke, Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25 (2005) 177–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kim J, Won JS, Singh AK, Sharma AK, Singh I, STAT3 Regulation by S-Nitrosylation: Implication for Inflammatory Disease, Antioxidants & redox signaling (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kim J, Won JS, Singh AK, Sharma AK, Singh I, STAT3 regulation by S-nitrosylation: implication for inflammatory disease, Antioxid Redox Signal 20 (2014) 2514–2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Komiyama Y, Nakae S, Matsuki T, Nambu A, Ishigame H, Kakuta S, Sudo K, Iwakura Y, IL-17 plays an important role in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, J Immunol 177 (2006) 566–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Konorev EA, Tarpey MM, Joseph J, Baker JE, Kalyanaraman B, S-nitrosoglutathione improves functional recovery in the isolated rat heart after cardioplegic ischemic arrest-evidence for a cardioprotective effect of nitric oxide, J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274 (1995) 200–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Langrish CL, Chen Y, Blumenschein WM, Mattson J, Basham B, Sedgwick JD, McClanahan T, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ, IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation, J Exp Med 201 (2005) 233–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lovett-Racke AE, Rocchini AE, Choy J, Northrop SC, Hussain RZ, Ratts RB, Sikder D, Racke MK, Silencing T-bet defines a critical role in the differentiation of autoreactive T lymphocytes, Immunity 21 (2004) 719–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lublin FD, Relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. An autoimmune model of multiple sclerosis, Springer Semin Immunopathol 8 (1985) 197–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Nath N, Khan M, Paintlia MK, Singh I, Hoda MN, Giri S, Metformin attenuated the autoimmune disease of the central nervous system in animal models of multiple sclerosis, J Immunol 182 (2009) 8005–8014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nath N, Morinaga O, Singh I, S-nitrosoglutathione a physiologic nitric oxide carrier attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 5 (2010) 240–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Niedbala W, Cai B, Liu H, Pitman N, Chang L, Liew FY, Nitric oxide induces CD4+CD25+ Foxp3 regulatory T cells from CD4+CD25 T cells via p53, IL-2, and OX40, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 15478–15483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Peng HB, Libby P, Liao JK, Induction and stabilization of I kappa B alpha by nitric oxide mediates inhibition of NF-kappa B, J Biol Chem 270 (1995) 14214–14219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Peng HB, Rajavashisth TB, Libby P, Liao JK, Nitric oxide inhibits macrophage-colony stimulating factor gene transcription in vascular endothelial cells, J Biol Chem 270 (1995) 17050–17055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Prasad R, Giri S, Nath N, Singh I, Singh AK, GSNO attenuates EAE disease by S-nitrosylation-mediated modulation of endothelial-monocyte interactions, Glia 55 (2007) 65–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Racke MK, Bonomo A, Scott DE, Cannella B, Levine A, Raine CS, Shevach EM, Rocken M, Cytokine-induced immune deviation as a therapy for inflammatory autoimmune disease, J Exp Med 180 (1994) 1961–1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Saxena N, Won J, Choi S, Singh AK, Singh I, S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) inhibitor as an immune modulator in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, Free Radic Biol Med 121 (2018) 57–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Singh SP, Wishnok JS, Keshive M, Deen WM, Tannenbaum SR, The chemistry of the S-nitrosoglutathione/glutathione system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (1996) 14428–14433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Song X, Qian Y, IL-17 family cytokines mediated signaling in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, Cell Signal 25 (2013) 2335–2347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Won JS, Kim J, Annamalai B, Shunmugavel A, Singh I, Singh AK, Protective role of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) against cognitive impairment in rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, J Alzheimers Dis 34 (2013) 621–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
