Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Aug 15;8:12163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29683-1

Potent Antitumor Effects of a Combination of Three Nutraceutical Compounds

Vikalp Vishwakarma 1,#, Jacob New 1,2,#, Dhruv Kumar 1,6, Vusala Snyder 1, Levi Arnold 1, Emily Nissen 1, Qingting Hu 3, Nikki Cheng 3, David Miller 4, Ahia Rael Thomas 1, Yelizaveta Shnayder 1, Kiran Kakarala 1, Terance Ted Tsue 1, Douglas A Girod 1, Sufi Mary Thomas 1,2,5,✉
PMCID: PMC6093880  PMID: 30111862

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with low survival, and the current aggressive therapies result in high morbidity. Nutraceuticals are dietary compounds with few side effects. However, limited antitumor efficacy has restricted their application for cancer therapy. Here, we examine combining nutraceuticals, establishing a combination therapy that is more potent than any singular component, and delineate the mechanism of action. Three formulations were tested: GZ17-S (combined plant extracts from Arum palaestinum, Peganum harmala and Curcuma longa); GZ17-05.00 (16 synthetic components of GZ17-S); and GZ17-6.02 (3 synthetic components of GZ17S; curcumin, harmine and isovanillin). We tested the formulations on HNSCC proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, macrophage viability and infiltration into the tumor and tumor apoptosis. GZ17-6.02, the most effective formulation, significantly reduced in vitro assessments of HNSCC progression. When combined with cisplatin, GZ17-6.02 enhanced anti-proliferative effects. Molecular signaling cascades inhibited by GZ17-6.02 include EGFR, ERK1/2, and AKT, and molecular docking analyses demonstrate GZ17-6.02 components bind at distinct binding sites. GZ17-6.02 significantly inhibited growth of HNSCC cell line, patient-derived xenografts, and murine syngeneic tumors in vivo (P < 0.001). We demonstrate GZ17-6.02 as a highly effective plant extract combination and pave the way for future clinical application in HNSCC.

Introduction

Despite advances in therapy, overall survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has marginally improved over the past 30 years1. Treatments are intensive and often result in severe toxicity2. One-third to one-half of survivors develop second primary tumors. With these dismal outcomes, there is great need for improved HNSCC therapies.

Nutraceuticals provide a powerful alternative to prevent and treat HNSCC because of their safety and general acceptance. In HNSCC preclinical models, promising antitumor efficacy with isothiocyanate3, luteolin4, resveratrol5, and genistein have been reported6. HNSCC nutraceutical clinical trials include: vitamin A derivatives7, curcumin8, green tea extract9, soybean extract10, and lycopene11. However, these are limited by studying prevention rather than treatment, and have had little efficacy and adoption into practice. As combining anticancer agents has proven to reduce side effects of single agents and potentiate antitumor effects, we sought to investigate if combining nutraceuticals may create an improved effect, and allow for a lower concentration of inhibitor to be used.

Curcuma longa is a widely studied nutraceutical12. Its active ingredient, curcumin, inhibits nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)13,14. However, curcumin has poor bioavailability15. As such, analogs of curcumin and nanoparticle encapsulation techniques have been designed to increase bioavailability16,17. Further, the combination of curcumin with additional nutraceuticals potentiates efficacy18, and the combination of curcumin provides additive benefit to chemotherapeutics19.

Arum palaestinum is widely cultivated in Palestine, and has been used in the treatment of cancer in Palestine for many years20. Ethanolic extracts of Arum palaestinum have shown antitumor efficacy against breast cancer, leukemia, and prostate cancer21,22. Yet, little has been done to characterize Arum palaestinum’s mechanism of action.

The alkaloids from the plant Peganum harmala are known to contain a wide spectrum of medicinal properties. The main constituent, harmine, is an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase, and also demonstrates anti-tumor effects23. Harmine intercalates and damages DNA24, and mitigates chemotherapy resistance by interfering with drug efflux25. Further, harmine decreased proliferation of various tumor lines, while having little effect on normal cells26.

Chemotherapies are often given to patients in combination. The aim of this study was to determine whether a potentiated effect could be achieved by combining nutraceuticals. Given the documented success of combination therapy with curcumin18,19, this was used as a starting point and included Arum palaestinum and Peganum harmala for their proposed anti-cancer activity in HNSCC. We assessed the combined plants, comparing a dried extract of the three plants (GZ17-S), a synthetic version of the extract (GZ17-05.00) and the three major anti-cancer agents found in the original plants (GZ17-6.02). Our results demonstrate a highly effective combination for use in HNSCC, more potent than any component used singularly, when assessed in preclinical models. We delineate the mechanism of action, and provide evidence of a useful biomarker for future clinical study.

Results

Combination of curcumin, harmine, and isovanillin demonstrates potent cytotoxicity in cancer cell lines

To determine the dose response to the formulations, varying concentrations of GZ17-formulations were tested on HNSCC cell lines (0, 0.78125, 1.5625, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 ug/mL). GZ17-6.02 demonstrated greatest cytotoxicity (OSC19 cell ED50 = 11.85 µg/ml; UM-SCC-1 cell ED50 = 13.03 µg/ml; HN5 cell ED50 = 13.73 µg/ml) as compared to GZ17-5.00 and GZ17-S (Fig. 1A, and Supplemental Fig. 1A). At 50 ug/mL no formula caused complete cytotoxicity, and therefore ED50 concentration was used for further studies. Additionally, poor cytotoxicity was observed in Het1A, an immortalized esophageal line from a cancer free patient (Supplemental Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

GZ17 formulations are cytotoxic to HNSCC, and have a potentiated effect compared to individual components. (A) OSC19 (4 × 103 cells/well in triplicate) were treated with various concentrations of GZ17-6.02, -5.0 and -S. Effective dose 50 (ED50) was calculated with non-linear curve fit using GraphPad Prism software. Cumulative data represents three individual experimental repeats and error bars represent ± SEM. (B) OSC19 (4 × 103 cells/well in triplicate) were treated with curcumin, harmine or isovanillin or combination of two components, each in a ratio representative of GZ17-6.02 in a final dose of 50 ug/mL for 48 h. (C) Glioblastoma (U87), and lung cancer lines (201T and A549) were treated with various concentrations of GZ17-6.02 to determine ED50 concentration. (D) HNSCC cells (OSC19; 2 × 105 cells) were treated with vehicle control or ED50 concentrations of GZ17-6.02, -05.00 or –S for 72 h and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of cells in various cell cycle stages is represented of each treatment of GZ17 formulation at ED50 concentration. Graph represents cumulative results from three independent experiments. (E) Representative immunoblot of apoptotic markers cleaved-PARP and caspase-3. β-tubulin levels demonstrate equal loading of protein across lanes.

To characterize cytotoxic effects of curcumin, harmine, and isovanillin in GZ17-6.02, we treated HNSCC cells with vehicle control (ethanol), single or double combination each in a ratio representative of GZ17-6.02 in a final dose of 50 ug/mL for 48 h. GZ17-6.02 demonstrated improved attenuation of viability, which was superior to single or double combination of agents (Fig. 1B). The cytotoxic effects of the combination are additive in nature (Supplemental Fig. 1C). This is the first report of the additive effects of such a combination, and demonstrates efficacy at lower concentrations than any singular component.

Additionally, to assess this combination across multiple tumor types, we assessed the proliferation of glioblastoma line U87, and lung cancer lines 201 T and A549. GZ17-6.02 was cytotoxic in these cell lines as similarly to the HNSCC lines tested (Fig. 1C). These data demonstrate combination therapy using multiple nutraceutical components decreases cancer cell proliferation.

GZ17-6.02 and −05.00 induce apoptosis through caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage

To understand the mechanism underlying GZ17 anti-proliferative effects, we treated HNSCC cells for 72 h at the ED50 dose. GZ17-05.00 and GZ17-6.02 induced significant apoptosis (24% and 22%, respectively, P < 0.05) as observed by the sub G0 fraction of cell cycle analysis in treated cells (Fig. 1D). To gain insight into the mechanism of GZ17-induced apoptosis, levels of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) and caspase-3 were evaluated using immunoblot. Treating cells with GZ17-6.02 and GZ17-05.00 at ED50 concentrations increased cleaved PARP and decreased caspase-3 (Fig. 1D), indicators of treatment-induced apoptosis.

GZ17-6.02 mitigates migration and invasion of HNSCC cells, and endothelial cell tubule formation

No treatment options are available for the metastatic spread of HNSCC, and patients with metastasis have a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%27. We assessed the effects of GZ17-formulations on HNSCC migration and invasion, prerequisites to metastasis. GZ17-6.02 (ED50 dose) was most effective in significantly inhibiting migration (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2A, Supplemental Fig. 2A); and invasion (p = 0.0003, Fig. 2B, Supplemental Fig. 2B). Additionally, we assessed the inhibitory effects of GZ17-6.02 against glioblastoma and lung cancer cell line migration and invasion, and observed significant reductions in U87 (Fig. 2C), 201T (Fig. 2D), and A549 (Fig. 2E) migration and invasion.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

GZ17 formulations mitigate HNSCC invasion and migration, and angiogenesis. (A,B) HNSCC cells (OSC19; 2 × 103 cells/ well, plated in triplicate) were treated with vehicle control or ED50 concentrations of GZ17-6.02, -05.00 or -S. Cell migration and invasion was assessed at 24 h. The number of cells that (A) migrated or (B) invaded were counted and normalized to the cell viability. Percent migration or invasion relative to the vehicle control is depicted in the graphs. Cumulative data represents three individual experimental repeats and error bars represent ± SEM. (C,D,E) Glioblastoma (U87), and (D and E) lung cancer (201T and A549) were assessed for GZ17-6.02 inhibition of migration and invasion. Cumulative data represents three individual experimental repeats and error bars represent ± SEM. (F) GZ17-6.02 attenuates the angiogenic potential of HUVEC in vitro. HUVEC cells were treated with the ED50 dose (derived from OSC19) of GZ17-6.02 and imaged 6 h after treatment and tubule formation was assessed. Total tube length analyzed using Pipeline software from 15 random fields from each repeat, and normalized to vehicle control treated cells (VC). Cumulative data represents three individual experimental repeats and error bars represent ± SEM. (G) GZ17-6.02 inhibits tumor-promoting macrophage survival. Macrophage cell line Thp1 were treated with 60 µg/ml GZ17-6.02 for 48 h. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue dye exclusion. Graph represents cumulative results from five independent experiments and error bars represent ± SEM.

Angiogenesis plays a critical role in HNSCC progression, however, no antiangiogenic therapies are approved for use in HNSCC28. Previously, curcumin has been reported to limit HUVEC tubule formation29, and vascular tubule mimicry30. We tested the efficacy of GZ17-6.02 (ED50 dose) to inhibit endothelial tubule formation, an in vitro indicator of angiogenesis31. GZ17-6.02 significantly decreased the length of HUVEC endothelial tubules compared to the vehicle control (p = 0.0001, Fig. 2F).

Macrophage infiltration is frequently associated with an inflammatory reaction, and tumor-associated macrophages facilitate tumor progression32. We tested the ability of GZ17-6.02 to attenuate macrophage infiltration into tumors using a 3-dimensional cell culture device called the metastatic mimetic device (MMD)33. HNSCC cells embedded in a collagen matrix were subjected to macrophage infiltration in the MMD in the presence of vehicle control or GZ17-6.02. GZ17-6.02 effectively reduced macrophage survival (Fig. 2G) and subsequently infiltration through the collagen plugs (Supplemental Fig. 2C). These cumulative data demonstrate that GZ17-6.02 significantly mitigates in vitro tumor progression.

GZ17-formulations modulate key signaling molecules in HNSCC

GZ17-formulations demonstrate significant anti-cancer effects in vitro. In order to assess the mechanism of action, and to understand the additive effects observed, we used a phospho-protein array. Phosphorylation of several proteins including Src, ERK1/2, EGFR, Akt, STAT-2 and Chk-2 were significantly reduced in GZ17-treated HNSCC (ED50 dose) (Fig. 3A,B). These are important mediators of HNSCC proliferation, migration and survival.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

GZ17 formulations modulate levels of several phospho-proteins in HNSCC. (A) HNSCC cells (OSC19; 2 × 105 cells) were treated with vehicle control or ED50 concentrations of GZ17-6.02, -05.00 or –S for 48 h. Representative dot-blot image from phospho-kinase array. (B) Densitometric analyses of dot-blot image signals from GZ17 treated lysates normalized to those from vehicle control and presented as fold change in protein levels. The graph represents cumulative data from two independent experiments. Error bars represent ± SEM. (C) HNSCC cells (OSC19; 2 × 105 cells) were treated with ED50 concentrations of GZ17-6.02, -05.00, –S or vehicle control for 72 h. Immunoblot was performed for phospho-ERK1/2 and total ERK1/2 as loading control. Image is representative of three independent experimental repeats. (D) Densitometric analyses of signals from immunoblots normalized to loading control and presented as fold change in protein levels relative to vehicle control treated cells. Error bars represent ± SEM.

ERK1/2 is a regulator of HNSCC proliferation, and increased levels are associated with advanced disease34. To validate phospho-protein array results, we evaluated pERK1/2 by immunoblot at both a short time interval when induced by EGF (5 m) and long interval (72 h) (Fig. 3C,D and Supplemental Fig. 2D). These data identify that GZ17-6.02 inhibits phosphorylation of ERK1/2, an important molecular mediator of HNSCC progression.

GZ17-6.02 components bind with high affinity to EGFR, ERK1/2, and Akt1

To further understand the mechanism of GZ17-6.02 active components, we carried out molecular docking analyses on the targets identified. Curcumin and harmine, as well as their metabolites, demonstrated high binding affinity to several targets (Supplemental Table 2). Both inhibitors, and their metabolites, demonstrated high affinity towards distinct binding sites on EGFR, ERK1/2, and Akt1 (Fig. 4, and Supplemental Figs 3–6). Curcumin exhibited best binding affinity of −6.6 Kcal/mol to Akt1 and −6.5 Kcal/mol to EGFR. Whereas, harmine showed best binding affinity with −6.3 Kcal/mol to Akt1 and −6.8 Kcal/mol to EGFR. Isovanillin did not have significant binding to the targets assessed. Simultaneous interaction of two inhibitors to the target may explain the improved efficacy of the combination.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Curcumin and harmine bind with high affinity to distinct sites on EGFR, ERK1 and Akt-1. Binding conformation of top ranked docked poses of (A,C,E) curcumin and (B,D,F) harmine on EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, ERK1 tyrosine kinase domain and Akt1 catalytic domain, respectively. Further details, including detailed labeling of interactive amino acid residues are provided in Supplemental Figs 3–6.

GZ17-6.02 enhances cisplatin efficacy

Platinum-based chemotherapy is a standard choice of treatment for HNSCC35. However, despite new protocols, tumor resistance to cisplatin remains a significant hurdle to HNSCC treatment. We assessed the combinatorial effect of GZ17-6.02 (ED50) with cisplatin (4.0 µM) in HNSCC cell lines. Combination of GZ17-6.02 and cisplatin significantly reduced HNSCC cell survival as compared to cisplatin or GZ17-6.02 treatments alone (p < 0.0008, Fig. 5A–C). Combination of radiation and GZ17-6.02 found GZ17-6.02 to have greater cytotoxicity than 3, 6, or 9 Gy of radiation alone (Supplemental Fig. 7), with no additive benefit of radiation in combination. This demonstrates GZ17-6.02 treatment potentiates effects of standard HNSCC chemotherapy.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

GZ17-6.02 in combination with cisplatin potentiates HNSCC cytotoxicity. HNSCC cells (A) OSC19, (B) HN5, and (C) UM-SCC-1; (2 × 103 cells/well) in triplicate were treated with respective ED50 concentrations of GZ17-6.02, cisplatin (4 µM), combination of both GZ17-6.02 and cisplatin, or vehicle control for 72 h. Cell survival was assessed by CyQUANT assay. Obtained values were normalized to vehicle control and depicted as fold change in cell survival. Cumulative data represents three individual experimental repeats plated in triplicate and error bars represent ± SEM.

GZ17-6.02 effectively inhibits HNSCC tumor growth in vivo

GZ17 formulations have not been tested in animal models. To determine the efficacy of GZ17 formulations in vivo, we treated subcutaneous OSC19 tumors in athymic nude mice with intratumoral injections (15 mg/kg/day) of GZ17-6.02 formulations. Among the formulations tested, GZ17-6.02 treatment was most efficacious with significant tumor volume reduction (p < 0.001, Fig. 6A). To assess GZ17-6.02 in an immunocompetent host, a syngeneic SCC model was employed. SCC vII/SF syngeneic tumors are highly aggressive requiring higher doses for testing. Thus, in this model, GZ17-6.02 was delivered by oral gavage, and a greater dose (100 mg/kg/day). Again, a significant decrease in tumor volume was demonstrated by GZ17-6.02 administered by oral gavage (p < 0.001, Fig. 6B). GZ17-6.02 receiving mice were active, curious and demonstrated normal, healthy behavior. There were no differences in mouse weights between treatment groups (Supplemental Figure 8), and no adverse effects from treatment were observed. This indicates GZ17-6.02 is well tolerated.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

GZ17-6.02 demonstrate significant reduction in HNSCC tumor growth in vivo. (A) HNSCC cells (OSC19; 1 × 106 cells) were inoculated subcutaneously on the flanks of athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice. Five mice per group were treated intratumorally with vehicle control (saline), or 15 mg/kg/d of GZ17-06.02, GZ17-5.0 or GZ17-S for three weeks. The graph depicts tumor volumes measured with a vernier caliper over the course of the experiment. Error bars represent ± SEM. (B) Immunocompetent SCC/vII tumor bearing C3H mice were treated with GZ17-6.02 (100 mg/kg/day in 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) suspension) or VC (1% CMC) by oral gavage (N = 10/group). Graph depicts tumor volumes measured with a vernier caliper over the course of the experiment. (C) Patient-derived HNSCC tumor masses (35 mg/site) were implanted subcutaneously on both flanks of athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice. Ten mice per group were treated by oral gavage with GZ17-6.02 (30 mg/kg/d for first 7 days, and dose increased to 50 mg/kg/d to improve antitumoral effect) or vehicle control (saline) for 19 days. The graph depicts fractional tumor volumes over the course of the experiment. (D) Representative immunoblot of patient-derived xenograft lysates demonstrates decrease in p-ERK1/2 levels. Densitometric analysis of p-ERK1/2 relative to density of loading control (β-tubulin) of GZ17-6.02 treated tumors (n = 8) compared relative to vehicle control (n = 8) were graphed. Error bars represent ± SEM.

Finally, the response of GZ17-6.02 in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors was evaluated. GZ17-6.02 was administered by oral gavage at a lower dose of 30 mg/Kg/d for 8 days. The dose was increased to 50 mg/kg/d for the remainder of the study to improve the antitumoral response. GZ17-6.02 demonstrated significant anti-tumor effects compared to the vehicle control treated mice (p < 0.01, Fig. 6C). In addition, tumors from GZ17-6.02 treated mice demonstrated a significant decrease in pERK1/2 levels (p = 0.0006, Fig. 6D). These data indicate substantial anti-tumor effects of GZ17-6.02 in HNSCC preclinical models.

Although promising anti-tumor effects are observed in preclinical models, a shortcoming of the current study is the lack of a clinical trial. Nevertheless, this study paves the way for future clinical studies.

Discussion

The safety and proven efficacy of nutraceuticals has spurred research enthusiasm36. In HNSCC, as well as other tumor types, the usefulness of combination therapy has also gathered great attention as targeting multiple components of a signaling pathway more effectively mitigates tumor progression37. However, few studies have examined combining nutraceuticals to potentiate their effects18, and none have studied a nutraceutical combination for HNSCC. As such, we hypothesized a combination therapy of known anti-cancer nutraceuticals could potentiate antitumor effects. Nonetheless, overly complex combinations of a plethora of nutraceuticals diminishes, and may even worsen, expected effects38. In this work, the nutraceutical curcumin, which had demonstrated putative efficacy in previous combinatorial approaches, was combined with two nutraceuticals proposed to have anti-cancer activity, Arum palaestinum and Peganum harmala. Our results demonstrate the rationally designed combination of GZ17-6.02, a blend of curcumin, harmine, isovanillin, is superior in anti-cancer efficacy compared to any single agent, and demonstrated robust anti-tumor effects in preclinical models.

In HNSCC, curcumin enhances cisplatin efficacy by increasing caspase 3/9 activity39, and in breast cancer, curcumin decreases proliferation by inhibiting phosphorylation of ERK1/240. In other tumor types, curcumin demonstrated promising combinatorial effects when combined with both natural compounds and effective drugs18. Our study corroborated these findings in that the combination therapy with GZ17-6.02 induced significant apoptosis through caspase 3, as well as inhibited phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Curcumin inhibits the production of reactive oxygen species in macrophages. This is an important step preventing macrophage-mediated inflammation-induced tumor progression41. Further, curcumin has been shown to induce the differentiation of macrophages to the tumor inhibitory M1 phenotype42. To this end, we demonstrated a significant reduction in macrophages in our MMD model. Harmine, the naturally occurring β-carboline, has anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic effects by intercalating and damaging DNA, and inducing tumor-suppressor p5324,43,44. Our studies substantiate these findings as GZ17-6.02 significantly decreased HNSCC proliferation and angiogenesis. Further, it reduced macrophage viability and infiltration into tumors in vitro. Isovanillin is a phenolic aldehyde, an isomer of vanillin that has not been extensively studied in the published literature for anticancer effects. However, isovanillin is known for its antioxidant effects45, and has been proposed as a potential antitumor agent22. In our preliminary studies, the combination of harmine and curcumin was potentiated by isovanillin, and, as such, we established the use of all three in the combined therapeutic.

As cancer pathogenesis is complex with many oncogenic pathways, the ability of an anti-cancer formulation to target multiple pathogenic steps is greatly desirable37. GZ17-6.02 decreases multiple signaling cascades, such as Src, ERK1/2, AKT, Stat-2, EGFR, and Chk-2. With molecular docking analyses, GZ17-6.02 components curcumin and harmine demonstrate high binding affinity with the active domains of EGFR, ERK1/2, and Akt1. Mutations in cancer related genes, including Akt1 and EGFR, and intratumoral heterogeneity can induce chemotherapy resistance46,47. The simultaneous binding of two or more ligands to the same target could be helpful in alleviating such resistance. Further, cisplatin resistance remains a significant hurdle for HNSCC treatment. We demonstrate the potentiated effects of standard of care cisplatin35, with GZ17-6.02. Previous studies indicate the improvement of cisplatin therapy with inhibition of Chk-248, and we demonstrate the deactivation of Chk-2 with GZ17-6.02 administration, providing a possible explanation to the potentiation we observed.

Whereas nutraceuticals are often limited by bioavailability, we demonstrate the combination therapy GZ17-6.02 decreases growth of HNSCC xenograft tumors, syngeneic SCC tumors in an immunocompetent mouse model, and patient-derived xenografts of HNSCC. In establishing an in vivo dose, 15 mg/kg/day was initially tested by intratumoral injection. When the treatment was delivered via oral gavage, the dose was increased to 100 mg/kg/day in the syngeneic model. To assess a lower dose by oral gavage, 30 mg/kg/day was initially tested in the PDX model, however, to improve the antitumor efficacy, the dose was increased to 50 mg/kg/day on the eighth day. In all models, formulations were well tolerated in mice, mouse weight was consistent between treatment arms, and no adverse effects were observed. This tolerability is supported by our in vitro findings of a high ED50 in the non-cancerous cell line Het1A.

Therefore, the potentiated effects observed through combination in vitro align with the significant anti-tumoral responses in animal models. Further, GZ17-6.02 significantly decreases phospho-ERK1/2 levels in vivo, which supports the in vitro mechanistic experiments, and the molecular docking analyses. A limitation to our study is the lack of comparing GZ17-6.02 with single agents or combinations of two agents in vivo. However, these agents have had little clinical efficacy as single agents in patients, and no toxicities were observed in combination therapy in the in vivo models we assessed. Thus, we demonstrate GZ17-6.02 to be an effective anti-tumor therapy for the treatment of HNSCC in preclinical models, and pave the way for future clinical trials using this combination.

Materials and Methods

Cells and Reagents

Well characterized HNSCC cell lines were used in this study49. HNSCC lines HN5, UM-SCC-1 and OSC19, immortalized esophageal Het1A line from cancer free patient, glioblastoma line U87, and murine SCC/vII maintained in high glucose DMEM (Corning, NY, USA) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal-bovine serum (FBS). Lung cancer lines 201T and A549 grown in Basal Eagle Media (for 201T) and Hams F12K media (for A549) both supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells were grown for no more than 10-12 passages. HUVECs maintained in endothelial basal medium-2 supplemented with endothelial growth media-2 SingleQuot Kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) per manufacturer’s instructions. Primary HNSCC tumors were collected under the auspices of the Biospecimen repository core at the University of Kansas Cancer Center with written informed consent from patients, using protocols approved by Institutional Review Boards at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), and all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

The plant extract, GZ17-S, was provided by Genzada Pharmaceuticals (Sterling, KS) and prepared by combining Peganum harmala seeds, curcumin, and Arum Palaestinum extract, using a previously published protocol22. GZ17-5.00 (Afaya Plus) was provided by Genzada Pharmaceuticals, and prepared by combining nutraceutical components: harmine (Indofine, Hillsborough, NJ), piperonal, curcumin, hydroxymethyl furfual, limonene, benzyl nitrile, citraconic anhydride, isovanillin, and methylpyroglutamate (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). In the extraction procedure, iodine solution (LabChem Inc, Zelienople, PA), beta-sitosterol (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA), linolenic acid (TCI Chemicals, Portland, OR), and diallyldisulfide (Sigma-Aldrich) were used. GZ17-6.02 was prepared by combining curcumin, harmine and isovanillin (Sigma-Aldrich) (Supplemental Table 1).

Cisplatin was obtained from Fresenius Kabi (purchased by KUMC Pharmacy, Kansas City, KS). Tofacitinib was purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX). Recombinant human epidermal growth factor receptor was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Gibco, PHG0314, Waltham, MA).

Cytotoxicity assay

Cells (4 × 103 cells/well, 96-well plate) were treated in triplicate with GZ17-formulations or indicated components at various concentrations, and cell proliferation assessed using CyQUANT assay kit (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA) per manufacturer’s instructions. ED50 calculated using non-linear curve fit with GraphPad Prism software version 6.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

HNSCC cells treated with cisplatin (4 µM), GZ17-6.02 (ED50 of respective cell type), combination cisplatin and GZ17-6.02, or vehicle control for 72 h. Cell viability assessed using CyQUANT.

To assess the efficacy of GZ17-06.02 to potentiate the effects of radiation on HNSCC, OSC19 (2 × 103 cells/well in 96-well plates) were treated with 3, 6, and 9 Gy of radiation. Plates were exposed to gamma radiation (J.L. Shepherd and Associates Mark I Model 68 A cesium-137 source irradiator; dose rate = 2.9 Gy/min). Media was aspirated, and cells were treated with GZ17-06.02 ED50 concentration or vehicle control in DMEM with 10% FBS.

Migration and invasion assay

Cells (2 × 104 cells per insert) were seeded in trans-well inserts with 8 μm pores (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). For invasion assay, a layer of diluted Matrigel (2 mg/ml) in DMEM (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) was placed in the insert. Cells in serum-free media were seeded onto Matrigel layer for invasion or directly onto insert for migration assay. The inserts were placed in duplicate holding-wells containing GZ17-formulations (ED50) in complete media for 24 h. Treated cells were plated in parallel to assess viability using CyQuant. The number of cells that moved to other side of membrane were counted after fixation and staining with Hema3 kit (Fisher Scientific). The numbers of invading or migrating cells were normalized to cell viability. Additional details provided in supplemental methods.

Tubule Formation Assay

HUVEC cells were plated on Matrigel in triplicate with GZ17-6.02 or vehicle control (15 × 103 cells/well of 96-well plate). After 6 h, images were taken from 5 random fields per well. Images analyzed using Pipeline software version 1.4 (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) according to published instructions to quantify total tube length50.

Macrophage infiltration and viability

To test the effect of GZ17-formulations in attenuation of macrophage infiltration into the tumor, we used the metastasic mimetic device (MMD) as previously described33. Briefly, 2.5 × 105 OSC19 cells were embedded in rat tail collagen in the MMD and allowed to gel overnight. 5 × 105 Thp1 cells were plated into the outer chamber of the device in serum containing medium. The collagen plug was imaged or processed for immunofluorescence analyses after 48 h. The number of macrophages that invaded the HNSCC containing collagen plugs were quantified using ImageJ software. Viability of Thp1 cells were assessed by counting cells on a hemocytometer with using trypan blue dye exclusion. HNSCC cell viability was assessed by imaging cells stained with 0.1 µM Calcein AM dye for 60 min at 37 °C in the dark.

Human phospho-kinase array

Human phospho-kinase array (ARY003, Proteome Profiler™, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) used to identify signaling molecules regulated by GZ17-formulations per manufacturer’s instructions. Membranes imaged by autoradiography, and ImageJ quantified signal intensity. Additional details provided in supplemental methods.

Immunoblotting

Cells (3 × 105 cells/60 mm dish) were treated with GZ17-formulations (ED50) for 72 h and lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors (cOmplete, Mini, Roche, Indianapolis, IN). For inhibition of EGF stimulation, cells were serum starved for 48 h, and then treated with GZ17-6.02 (ED50) for 2 h. EGF (10 ng/mL) was applied for 5 m, and then cells were harvested in RIPA buffer containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors on ice Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with p-ERK1/2 (p44/42-pMAPK; Thr202/Tyr204), total ERK1/2, cleaved PARP, caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) and β-tubulin (Fisher). Immunoreactivity detected using anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Dylight-680 or −800 (Fisher). Protein bands detected using Li-Cor Odyssey protein imaging system (Li-Cor Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE) and quantified using ImageJ. Additional details provided in supplemental methods.

Computational Molecular Docking

Ligands designed using ACD/ChemSketch software (ACDlabs, Ontario, Canada). Crystal structures of proteins downloaded from RCSB-Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do). AutoDock-Vina employed for molecular docking using protein and ligand information. During the docking procedure, proteins were considered as rigid and ligands as flexible. The docking pose with lowest binding energy and highest binding affinity was aligned with the protein structure. Additional details provided in supplemental methods.

Cell cycle analysis

OSC-19 cells (2 × 105) treated in triplicate with ED50 concentrations of GZ17-formulations for 72 h. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 70% ethanol, stained with propidium iodide (0.02 mg/ml in PBS with 0.1% TritonX-100) (Life Technologies), and subjected to cell cycle analysis using Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using the software provided by the manufacturer and samples analyzed in triplicate.

In vivo studies

Animal care was in strict compliance with IACUC guidelines at the University of Kansas Medical Center, and all experimental protocols were approved by the IACUC. Mice were housed in individually ventilated cages in a sterile environment, and all experimental work was conducted during daytime hours. All outcome measures were assessed by a blinded observer. To assess in vivo antitumor efficacy of GZ17-formulations, 1 × 106 HNSCC (OSC19) cells were injected subcutaneously into the flank of athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN). Tumor bearing mice were randomized once tumor volume reached 5.0 mm3. Mice treated with 15 mg/kg/day of GZ17-formulations or with saline control by 50 µL intratumoral administration once daily, five days/week. Tumor diameters measured in two perpendicular dimensions and volume calculated as previously described, briefly (tumor volume = long dimension x (short dimension)^2 × 0.52)51. Animals euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by pneumothorax.

To assess GZ17-6.02 in immunocompetent host, a syngeneic HNSCC model was used52. 1 × 106 SCC/vII cells were inoculated in the flank of C3H mice. Tumors were established for 6 days, and mice randomized into treatment groups (n = 10/group). Treatment was delivered suspended in 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) by oral gavage (100 mg/kg/day). Mouse weight and tumor volumes were assessed three times per week.

To assess GZ17-6.02 in patient-derived HNSCC xenografts, 35 mg of primary HNSCC tissue was surgically implanted subcutaneously into flanks of athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice under inhalant isofluorane anesthesia. Intraoperatively animals were administered analgesic Buprenorphine SR at 0.3 mg/kg and tofacitnib (to reduce natural killer cell counts) at 15 mg/kg via subcutaneous injections. Established tumors were passaged twice through mice before implantation for study. Tumor bearing mice were randomized in treatment groups (n = 10/group). Mice were treated with 30 mg/kg GZ17-6.02 or 1% carboxymethycellulose control via oral gavage once daily, five days/week. The dose was increased to 50 mg/kg/day on treatment day 8 to improve antitumoral response. As PDX models have variable growth rates, data presented for in vivo studies as fractional tumor volume. Tumors were excised, snap frozen in dry ice and analyzed by immunoblotting.

Statistical Analysis

All results are cumulative from three independent experiments, unless otherwise indicated. Data analyzed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests. Analyses performed using Graphpad Prism Version 6.03.

Data Availability

The data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

41598_2018_29683_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Supplementary Methods, Tables, and Figure Legends

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Kansas Cancer Center CCSG (1-P30-CA168524-02). We acknowledge support from the University of Kansas (KU) Cancer Center’s Biospecimen Repository Core Facility staff for helping obtain human specimens.

Author Contributions

Study conception and Design: V.V., J.N., D.K., N.C., D.M., Y.S., K.K., T.T., D.A.G., S.M.T. Acquisition of Data: V.V., J.N., D.K., A.R.T., V.S., L.A., E.N., Q.H., S.M.T. Analysis and Interpretation of Data: V.V., J.N., D.K., V.S., L.A., E.N., Q.H., N.C., D.M., S.M.T. Drafting of Manuscript: V.V., J.N., D.K., S.M.T. Critical Revision: Y.S., K.K., T.T., D.A.G., S.M.T.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Vikalp Vishwakarma and Jacob New contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-29683-1.

References

  • 1.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJM, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Suh Y, Amelio I, Guerrero Urbano T, Tavassoli M. Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death & Disease. 2014;5:e1018. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yeh YT, et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate induces DNA damage-associated G2/M arrest and subsequent apoptosis in oral cancer cells with varying p53 mutations. Free radical biology & medicine. 2014;74:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang H, Li X, Zhang Y, Luan X. Luteolin induces apoptosis by activating Fas signaling pathway at the receptor level in laryngeal squamous cell line Hep-2 cells. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2014;271:1653–1659. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2903-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin HY, et al. Resveratrol causes COX-2- and p53-dependent apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell cancer cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2008;104:2131–2142. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alhasan SA, Aranha O, Sarkar FH. Genistein elicits pleiotropic molecular effects on head and neck cancer cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2001;7:4174–4181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Papadimitrakopoulou VA, et al. Randomized trial of 13-cis retinoic acid compared with retinyl palmitate with or without beta-carotene in oral premalignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:599–604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim SG, et al. Curcumin treatment suppresses IKKbeta kinase activity of salivary cells of patients with head and neck cancer: a pilot study. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17:5953–5961. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saba NF, et al. Prevention of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: removing the “chemo” from “chemoprevention”. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Armstrong WB, et al. Bowman Birk Inhibitor Concentrate and Oral Leukoplakia: A Randomized Phase IIb Trial. Cancer Prevention Research. 2013;6:410–418. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh M, Krishanappa R, Bagewadi A, Keluskar V. Efficacy of oral lycopene in the treatment of oral leukoplakia. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vallianou NG, Evangelopoulos A, Schizas N, Kazazis C. Potential anticancer properties and mechanisms of action of curcumin. Anticancer research. 2015;35:645–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Notarbartolo M, et al. Antitumor effects of curcumin, alone or in combination with cisplatin or doxorubicin, on human hepatic cancer cells. Analysis of their possible relationship to changes in NF-kB activation levels and in IAP gene expression. Cancer letters. 2005;224:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin SS, et al. Curcumin inhibits the migration and invasion of human A549 lung cancer cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Cancer letters. 2009;285:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng AL, et al. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant lesions. Anticancer research. 2001;21:2895–2900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tamvakopoulos C, et al. Metabolism and anticancer activity of the curcumin analogue, dimethoxycurcumin. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2007;13:1269–1277. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khalil NM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin-loaded PLGA and PLGA-PEG blend nanoparticles after oral administration in rats. Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2013;101:353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saldanha SN, Tollefsbol TO. The role of nutraceuticals in chemoprevention and chemotherapy and their clinical outcomes. Journal of oncology. 2012;2012:192464. doi: 10.1155/2012/192464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kunnumakkara AB, et al. Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer through suppression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated gene products. Cancer research. 2007;67:3853–3861. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ali-Shtayeh MS, et al. Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in Palestine (Northern West Bank): a comparative study. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Husein AI, et al. In vitro antioxidant and antitumor activities of six selected plants used in the Traditional Arabic Palestinian herbal medicine. Pharm Biol. 2014;52:1249–1255. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.886274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cole C, Burgoyne T, Lee A, Stehno-Bittel L, Zaid G. Arum Palaestinum with isovanillin, linolenic acid and beta-sitosterol inhibits prostate cancer spheroids and reduces the growth rate of prostate tumors in mice. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2015;15:264. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0774-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Patel K, Gadewar M, Tripathi R, Prasad SK, Patel DK. A review on medicinal importance, pharmacological activity and bioanalytical aspects of beta-carboline alkaloid “Harmine”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012;2:660–664. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60116-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boeira JM, Viana AF, Picada JN, Henriques JA. Genotoxic and recombinogenic activities of the two beta-carboline alkaloids harman and harmine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutation research. 2002;500:39–48. doi: 10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00294-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ma Y, Wink M. The beta-carboline alkaloid harmine inhibits BCRP and can reverse resistance to the anticancer drugs mitoxantrone and camptothecin in breast cancer cells. Phytotherapy research: PTR. 2010;24:146–149. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Song Y, et al. Specific inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases and cell proliferation by harmine. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2004;317:128–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jemal A, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2008. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2008;58:71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vassilakopoulou M, Psyrri A, Argiris A. Targeting angiogenesis in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncology. 2015;51:409–415. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thaloor D, et al. Inhibition of angiogenic differentiation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells by curcumin. Cell growth & differentiation: the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 1998;9:305–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hu A, et al. Curcumin as therapeutics for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by activating SIRT1. Scientific reports. 2015;5:13429. doi: 10.1038/srep13429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arnaoutova I, Kleinman HK. In vitro angiogenesis: endothelial cell tube formation on gelled basement membrane extract. Nature protocols. 2010;5:628–635. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pollard JW. Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:71–78. doi: 10.1038/nrc1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fang WB, et al. Targeted gene silencing of CCL2 inhibits triple negative breast cancer progression by blocking cancer stem cell renewal and M2 macrophage recruitment. Oncotarget. 2016;7:49349–49367. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Albanell J, et al. Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases: association with epidermal growth factor receptor/transforming growth factor alpha expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma and inhibition by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments. Cancer research. 2001;61:6500–6510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vermorken JB, et al. Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359:1116–1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gupta SC, Kim JH, Prasad S, Aggarwal BB. Regulation of survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of tumor cells through modulation of inflammatory pathways by nutraceuticals. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2010;29:405–434. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9235-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Janne PA, Gray N, Settleman J. Factors underlying sensitivity of cancers to small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Nature reviews. Drug discovery. 2009;8:709–723. doi: 10.1038/nrd2871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Spindler SR, Mote PL, Flegal JM. Lifespan effects of simple and complex nutraceutical combinations fed isocalorically to mice. Age. 2014;36:705–718. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9609-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Duarte VM, et al. Curcumin enhances the effect of cisplatin in suppression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via inhibition of IKKbeta protein of the NFkappaB pathway. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2665–2675. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hua WF, et al. Curcumin induces down-regulation of EZH2 expression through the MAPK pathway in MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells. European journal of pharmacology. 2010;637:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Joe B, Lokesh BR. Role of capsaicin, curcumin and dietary n-3 fatty acids in lowering the generation of reactive oxygen species in rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1994;1224:255–263. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(94)90198-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tu SP, et al. Curcumin induces the differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and inhibits their interaction with cancer cells and related tumor growth. Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2012;5:205–215. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dai F, et al. A Natural Small Molecule Harmine Inhibits Angiogenesis and Suppresses Tumour Growth through Activation of p53 in Endothelial Cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hamsa TP, Kuttan G. Harmine inhibits tumour specific neo-vessel formation by regulating VEGF, MMP, TIMP and pro-inflammatory mediators both in vivo and in vitro. European journal of pharmacology. 2010;649:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cioffi G, et al. Antioxidant and free-radical scavenging activity of constituents of the leaves of Tachigalia paniculata. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:1526–1529. doi: 10.1021/np0200764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ledgerwood, L. G. et al. The degree of intratumor mutational heterogeneity varies by primary tumor sub-site. Oncotarget, 10.18632/oncotarget.8448 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Chong CR, Janne PA. The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer. Nat Med. 2013;19:1389–1400. doi: 10.1038/nm.3388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Feng Z, Xu S, Liu M, Zeng YX, Kang T. Chk1 inhibitor Go6976 enhances the sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2010;297:190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lin CJ, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines: established models and rationale for selection. Head & neck. 2007;29:163–188. doi: 10.1002/hed.20478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prisco AR, et al. Automated Quantification Reveals Hyperglycemia Inhibits Endothelial Angiogenic Function. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wheeler, S. E. et al. Enhancement of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by tumor-associated fibroblasts in preclinical models. Head Neck, 10.1002/hed.23312 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Smith LP, Thomas GR. Animal models for the study of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: A historical perspective with review of their utility and limitations. Part A. Chemically-induced de novo cancer, syngeneic animal models of HNSCC, animal models of transplanted xenogeneic human tumors. International Journal of Cancer. 2006;118:2111–2122. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41598_2018_29683_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Supplementary Methods, Tables, and Figure Legends

Data Availability Statement

The data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES