Abstract
Background
Hypoxia is a hallmark of the solid tumor microenvironment and is associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients. The present study was performed to investigate mechanisms underlying the hypoxia-induced phenotypic changes using human malignant mesothelioma (HMM) cells.
Methods
Hypoxic conditions were achieved by incubating HMM cells in the air chamber. The effect of hypoxia on phenotype changes in HMM cells was investigated by performing in vitro clonogenicity, drug resistance, migration, and invasion assays. Signaling pathways and molecules involved in the more aggressive behaviors of HMM cells under hypoxia were investigated. A two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction was used in this study.
Results
Hypoxic conditions upregulated hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) and HIF-2α in parallel with the upregulation of its target, Glut-1, in HMM cells. In vitro clonogenicity of HMM cells was significantly increased in hypoxic conditions, but the proliferation of cells at a high density in hypoxia was lower than that in normoxic conditions. The expression levels of HIF-2α and Oct4 were increased in hypoxic HMM cells. The percentage of cells with high CD44 expression was significantly higher in HMM cells cultured in hypoxia than those cultured in normoxia. Hypoxia significantly enhanced the resistance of HMM cells to cisplatin, which occurred through cytoprotection against cisplatin-induced apoptosis. While cisplatin treatment decreased the ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax in normoxic condition, hypoxia conversely increased the ratio in HMM cells treated with cisplatin. Hypoxia increased the mobility and invasiveness of HMM cells. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition was promoted, which was indicated by the repression of E-cadherin and the concomitant increase of vimentin in HMM cells.
Conclusions
The data illustrated that hypoxic conditions augmented the aggressive phenotypes of HMM cells at the biological and molecular levels. The present study provides valuable background information beginning to understand aggressiveness of HMM in tumor microenvironments, suggesting that a control measure for tumor hypoxia may be an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce the aggressiveness of cancer cells in HMM patients.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4720-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Mesothelioma, Hypoxia, Tumor microenvironment, Malignant phenotypes, HIFα, Stemness, EMT, Drug resistance
Background
Hypoxia is a common feature of tumor microenvironment [1]. There are two types of hypoxia in solid tumors, intermittent hypoxia and chronic hypoxia. Intermittent hypoxia results from abnormal blood flow associated with transient fluctuations in tumor perfusion and the high permeability of tumor vessels with interstitial hypertension [2]. Chronic hypoxia arises due to the inability of the vascular system to supply the growing tumor mass with adequate amounts of oxygen [3]. Both types of tumor hypoxia have been reported to be correlated with poor outcomes in many cancer patients [4]. Hypoxia enhances cancer cell survival, metastasis, and drug resistance in multiple tumor types [1, 4].
One of the adaptive cellular responses to hypoxia is to increase the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor alpha (HIFα), a subunit of the heterodimeric transcription factor HIF [5]. In normoxia, the HIFα subunit is hydroxylated by prolyl hydroxylases (PHD) and recognized by an E3 ubiquitin ligase, von Hippel-Lindau protein, which proteasomally degrades the HIFα protein [6]. Under hypoxia, however, HIFα becomes stable and starts to accumulate in cancer cells by blocking the von Hip-mediated ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [6]. HIFα heterodimerizes with HIF-1β and migrates to the nucleus. The heterodimer recognizes and binds the hypoxia-responsive element located in the promotor of hundreds of genes [6]. Transcriptional activity of HIF in cancer cells is largely mediated by HIF-1α and HIF-2α [7]. The function of HIF-1α has been extensively investigated in nearly every stage of tumor progression [8]. Recently, growing evidence has suggested that HIF-2α is also a critical mediator of aggressive cancer phenotypes including metastasis and dedifferentiation [9]. Although HIF-1α and HIF-2α activate numerous hypoxia-induced genes harboring HIF binding motifs, each HIFα subunit has its own preferential targets. For example, HIF-1α induces genes primarily involved in anaerobic glycolysis, angiogenesis, and apoptosis [3, 8]. On the other hand, HIF-2α regulates genes that promote invasion and stemness [9, 10]. Depending on tumor types or hypoxic duration, the HIFα isoforms are mutually cooperative or exclusive for biological functions and phenotypes [7].
Human malignant mesothelioma (HMM) is an aggressive malignancy arising from the mesothelium on the surface of the body cavity [11]. Exposure to asbestos fibers increases the risk of HMM, but simian virus 40 may also have a role in HMM tumorigenesis [11]. The occurrence rate of HMM is anticipated to increase worldwide [12]. HMM is highly resistant to traditional anticancer drugs [13]. Several mechanisms of drug resistance have been proposed in HMM, including drug transporters, anti-apoptosis, and antioxidant defenses [14]. Despite the advances in systemic chemotherapy using an antifolate-platinum regimen have improved clinical outcomes in HMM patients, overall prognosis remains poor with median survival times of 4 to 13 months from the initial diagnosis [15, 16].
The existence of hypoxic cells within a tumor is associated with modulation of the malignant process in many cancers [1, 5]. Recent studies have revealed that HMM contains hypoxic regions, suggesting a potential link between tumor hypoxia and ineffective therapeutic efficacy [17, 18]. However, the mechanism underlying the effect of hypoxia on HMM remains largely unknown. The present study showed that hypoxia promotes aggressive phenotypes of HMM cells. Hypoxia enhances in vitro clonogenicity, migration, invasion, and drug resistance through inhibition of apoptosis in HMM cells. Various signaling networks and molecular candidates were suggested for the aggressive biological behaviors of HMM cells, including HIF-1/2α and Oct4 signaling pathways, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), and Bcl-2 regulation. Exploiting tumor hypoxia may be an alternative therapeutic strategy to reduce the aggressive behavior of HMM cells.
Methods
Cell culture and cell lines
MS1 and H513 cell lines were kindly provided by Dr. Jablons (University of California, San Francisco) and Dr. R Kratzke (University of Minnesota), respectively. The cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Mediatech Inc.), 10 mM of glucose, 10 mM of HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM of sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 100 U/100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco-Life Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. To establish a glucose-starved condition, HMM cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco-Life Technology) supplemented with 0 or 1 mM of D-(+)-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich). The HMM cell lines were determined to be free of mycoplasma contamination by using e-Myco Mycoplasma PCR detection kit (e-Myco, iNtRON Biotechnology, Sungnam, Korea).
Hypoxic condition
Hypoxia was generated by infusing a pre-analyzed air mixture (2.2% O2/5% CO2/92.8% N2) at a flow rate of 5 L/min for 15 min into an air chamber (Billups-Rothenberg Inc., Del Mar, CA, USA) with inflow and outflow valves. Hypoxic treatment of cells was achieved by incubating the cells in the air chamber maintained in a humidified environment at 37 °C. The culture medium was replaced just before carrying out hypoxic treatment.
Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay
Cell proliferation was determined by counting the number of cells and measuring cell metabolic activity using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) dye in each well at defined intervals. Cells were seeded on 6-well plates or 96-well plates at a different density per well. For cell proliferation by manual counting and MTT assay, each group was replicated in five and six separate wells, respectively. The following day, the cells were subjected to normoxia or hypoxia for the indicated periods either without drugs or with varying concentrations of cisplatin (Dong-A Pharm, Seoul, the Republic of Korea). For cytotoxicity assay, each group was replicated in three separate wells. After the treatment, the cells were enumerated using a hemocytometer under an Olympus CK2 microscope (Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). After incubation in MTT dye (5 mg/mL) for 2 h at 37 °C, protected from the light, the absorbance values were determined at 570 nm by the microplate reader (Gen5, Epoch, Bio Tek, Winooski, VT, USA). The absorbance from untreated control cells under each normoxic and hypoxic condition was considered representative of 100% cell viability. All other measurements were expressed as a percentage of the control cell value ± standard deviation.
Clonogenicity assay
To prevent cell to cell contact or the overlapping of too many colonies, 200 cells were chosen to seed on 6-well plates, as previously described [19]. Each group was replicated in four separate wells. When attached to the plate, the cells were subjected to incubation for 48 h under normoxia or hypoxia. After the incubation, the culture medium was replaced, and the cells were further incubated at 37 °C for 5 days. The cells were fixed with methanol for 5 min, stained with Diff-Quik solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and dried. Groups of more than 50 cells were counted as viable colonies. The colony forming ability was determined by calculating the percentage of surviving cells based on the plating efficiency that is a ratio of the number of colonies to the number of cells seeded [19].
Wound healing assay
HMM cells were seeded on 24-well plates at cell densities of 105 cells per well in triplicate. When the cells reached 90% confluence, the culture medium was replaced with one containing mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 2 μg/mL, followed by further incubation for 2 h. Mitomycin C was used to minimize the proliferative effect of cancer cells, and the concentration used in this study was found to be non-cytotoxic [20]. The cell monolayer was manually scratched with a 1000 μl pipette tip. The cells were subjected to further incubation in normoxia or hypoxia for 48 h. The area of the scratch distance was photographed under a phase contrast microscope using an Olympus CK2 camera (Optical Co.) at 0 and 48 h of incubation. Cell migration was determined by measuring the migration distance. The results were normalized to the initial scratch distance and presented as % with the normoxic condition set at 100%.
Invasion assay
The 24-transwell plates (8.0 μm pore size with poly-carbonate membrane; Corning Costar, Lowell, MA, USA) covered with 2 mg/ml basement membrane Matrigel matrix (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) were used for the invasion assay. Each group was replicated in three separate wells. The coated transwell was hydrated with culture medium for 2 h prior to cell seeding. HMM cells were resuspended in serum-free medium and seeded at a cell density of 2.5 × 104 into the upper invasion chamber. Culture medium containing 10% FBS was then added to the lower chamber. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under normoxia or hypoxia. After a day of incubation, the cells that had invaded the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol for 5 min, stained with Diff-Quik solution (Merck), and quantified by counting five random fields using a phase contrast microscope. Invasion was expressed as the ratio of invading cells incubated under hypoxia compared to the controls in normoxia.
Apoptosis assay
HMM cells were seeded on 60 mm2 petri dishes with confluency of 60% density in quadruplicate. On the following day, the cells were incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 48 h either with or without cisplatin (10 μM). After the incubation, apoptosis was evaluated using the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Komabiotech, Inc., Seoul, Korea). Briefly, cells were harvested, washed, and incubated in binding buffer containing a saturating concentration of FITC-conjugated Annexin V in the dark for 15 min at room temperature. After being washed with a binding buffer, the cells were resuspended and incubated with 500 μl of binding buffer containing 10 μl of propidium iodide (PI) on ice. The cells were immediately analyzed for the fluorescence of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and PI using flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells undergoing early and late apoptosis were determined.
Cell cycle analysis
HMM cells were plated on 6-well plates at confluency of 50% density in triplicate. After a day of incubation, the cells were subjected to normoxia or hypoxia for 24 and 48 h. At the indicated time points, cells were harvested and fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol for 2 h at − 20 °C. After being washed with PBS, the cells were incubated with PI/RNase staining buffer (BD Pharmingen, BD Biosciences) for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were immediately subjected to analysis using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) for the determination of their DNA contents.
Measurement of cell surface CD44 expression
HMM cells were plated on 6-well plates in triplicate. After 48 h of hypoxia incubation, HMM cells resuspended in PBS were incubated with primary antibody against CD44 (Genetex, CA, USA) at 4 °C for 1 h in the dark. Secondary antibody goat anti-rat IgG-PE (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for CD44 analysis was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. After washing with PBS, HMM cells were resuspended in PBS and subjected to flow cytometric analysis for CD44 expression. Unstained cells were used to gate on live cells. After excluding cell debris from the gated populations, a minimum of 10,000 events per condition were collected for the analysis.
Western blot analysis
After washing cells with cold PBS twice, cell lysates were obtained using RIPA lysis buffer containing complete protease inhibitors. The same amounts of protein were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; subsequently, the protein bands were transferred onto a nitrous membrane by a wet transfer apparatus. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 60 min, the nitrous membrane was placed in 0.1% Tween 20 PBS (T-PBS) containing primary antibodies including HIF-1α (1:1000, Cell Signaling), HIF-2α (1:1000, Cell Signaling), E-cadherin (1:1000, Cell Signaling), Bcl-2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling), Bax (1:1000, Cell Signaling), Bcl-xL (1:1000, Cell Signaling), Oct4 (1:1000, Cell Signaling) and vimentin (1:1000, Cell Signaling) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. An antibody against β-actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling) was used as a loading control. After the blot was washed with T-PBS three times for 10 min each, peroxidase-labeled secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (1:2000) were applied to the blot for 90 min. The protein levels were detected on CL-Exposure film with the use of enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Densitometric analysis was performed using the ImageJ program (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij).
Gene expression and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the HMM cell lines using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The quality and quantity of the total RNA were assessed using Nanodrop (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Total RNA of 500 ng was used to synthesize cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the Rotor-Gene SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and then 60 °C for 30 s. The expression level of each gene was normalized based on endogenous GAPDH expression. The analysis of relative gene expression was determined according to the 2−ΔΔCt method, as previously described [21]. The primer sequences used in this study are listed in Additional file 1.
Statistical analysis
All data were presented as the means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were done using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Seattle, WA, USA) and SPSS software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). P values were calculated by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction. The results were confirmed in at least three independent experiments and considered to be statistically significant when P value was less than 0.05. All dataset and the statistical information are listed in Additional file 2.
Results
Experimental induction of hypoxia in vitro
Experimental establishment of hypoxia was verified by HIFα induction in HMM cells. Western blot analysis confirmed the upregulation of HIF-1α and the de novo synthesis of HIF-2α under hypoxia (Fig. 1a). As hypoxia was prolonged, HIF-1/2α target Glut-1 expression was also elevated, suggesting a functional transcriptional activity of HIF-1α in the hypoxic state (Fig. 1b). Glucose starvation was used as a positive control for Glut-1 expression.
Hypoxia enhanced in vitro clonogenicity but reduced proliferation of HMM cells
The plating efficiency of the untreated control was approximately 0.6 in HMM cells. Hypoxia significantly increased the surviving fraction by 34% and 37% in MS1 and H513 cells, respectively, compared to that of normoxic cells (Fig. 2a). Because the ability of tumor cells to form a single colony is related to the acquisition of stemness properties, the levels of a variety of stemness genes were investigated. Among them, Oct4 gene expression was significantly increased in HMM cells under hypoxia (Fig. 2b). The Oct4 protein was also significantly elevated under hypoxia (Fig. 2c). We also attempted to determine cell surface markers that correlate with stem cell signatures, and hypoxia was found to significantly increase the percentage of HMM cells with the high CD44 expression, a putative marker of cancer stemness of HMM (Additional file 3) [22, 23]. On the other hand, chronic hypoxia did not enhance the proliferative capacity of HMM cells. As the cell density increased, an inhibitory effect of hypoxia on cell growth was detected (Fig. 3a). The parallel measurement using MTT dye also confirmed the significant reduction in cell proliferation of HMM cells under hypoxia. The absorbance-based cell viability was decreased after 48 h of hypoxia from the initial seeding density of 1000 and 5000 in MS1 and H513 cells, respectively (Fig. 3b). The reduced proliferation under hypoxia was not attributable to the cell cycle arrest at the G1/0 phase (Fig. 3c). The data indicated that hypoxia improved single cell survivability that was mediated through stemness acquisition in HMM cells.
Hypoxia induced drug resistance in HMM cells
In the normoxic state, cisplatin treatment decreased the cell viability of HMM cells in a dose-dependent manner, but hypoxia significantly reduced the sensitivity of the cells to the drug (Fig. 4). Because apoptosis has been used for the evaluation of the chemotherapeutic efficacy of cisplatin [14], a bivariate Annexin V/PI analysis was performed. Compared to the apoptosis of cells exposed to cisplatin in normoxia, hypoxia not only decreased apoptosis in HMM cells without cisplatin treatment but also significantly inhibited cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5a). The expression levels of representative pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members were determined by immunoblot analysis. As shown in Fig. 5b, the Bcl-2 level was increased in HMM cells under the hypoxic state compared to the level in HMM cells under normoxic conditions. However, the level of Bcl-xL remained almost unchanged in hypoxic MS1 cells, and the increase of Bcl-xL was much less in hypoxic H513 cells, compared to that in normoxic H513 cells. A profound elevation of Bax expression was detected in hypoxic MS1 cells, but it remained almost unchanged in H513 cells. Due to the high Bax expression under hypoxia, the ratio of either Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL to Bax was decreased in MS1 cells. The Bcl-2 to Bax ratio remained increased in H513 cells following hypoxia, but the increase in the ratio of Bcl-xL to Bax was not significant. Figure 5c shows the expression profiles of the Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bax in HMM cells treated with cisplatin. In the normoxic state, cisplatin reduced the expression of Bcl-2, but hypoxia increased and maintained the Bcl-2 expression in HMM cells treated with cisplatin. With cisplatin treatment, Bcl-xL expression was decreased in HMM cells as hypoxia was prolonged. The densitometric analysis confirmed the upregulation of Bax expression following cisplatin treatment in MS1 cells. The extent of increase in Bax expression was diminished in hypoxic MS1 cells, compared to the level of MS1 cells in normoxia. While the Bcl-2 to Bax ratio decreased in the normoxic state following cisplatin treatment, hypoxia increased the ratio. The Bcl-xL to Bax ratio was lowered in hypoxic HMM cells treated with cisplatin, compared to that of HMM cells treated with cisplatin in normoxia. Taken together, these results indicated that hypoxia promoted the resistance of HMM cells to cisplatin by regulating Bcl-2 family members.
Hypoxia enhanced migration, invasion, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition of HMM cells
In the wound healing assay, HMM cells in hypoxia displayed a smaller gap distance than did cells under normoxia (Fig. 6a). Under hypoxia, H513 cells showed increased invasiveness (Fig. 6b). The H513 cells were round to oval or occasionally polygonal with a small amount of cytoplasm, showing high nucleus to cytosol ratio. The MS1 cells were generally spindle to polygonal (Fig. 6c). The HMM cells exposed to hypoxia underwent a morphologic change, showing a neuron-like appearance characterized by pseudopodia protrusions (Fig. 6c). To investigate the mechanisms underlying hypoxia-induced cell migration, the expression levels of two representative EMT-related markers, E-cadherin and vimentin, were analyzed. Western blot analysis revealed that hypoxia reduced the expression of E-cadherin and concomitantly increased the expression of vimentin in HMM cells (Fig. 6d). Vimentin was upregulated in MS1 cells, but E-cadherin was not detected. It might be due to the infrequent expression of E-cadherin in HMM cell lines or primary tumors with mesenchymal cell phenotype [21]. These results showed that hypoxia enhances the acquisition of migratory and invasive phenotypes that are associated with the EMT process in HMM cells.
Discussion
Tumor cell adaptation to hypoxic condition leads to cancer progression [1, 2, 5]. The present study demonstrates that hypoxia causes HMM cells to behave more aggressively at the biological and molecular levels. Hypoxia enhanced in vitro clonogenicity, migration, invasion, and drug resistance to cisplatin in HMM cells. Various signaling pathways and molecular targets were associated with the hypoxia-induced aggressive behaviors, including HIF-1/2α, EMT, Oct4, and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2. The data presented in this study emphasize the clinical importance of hypoxia in the biology of HMM. Exploiting molecular signaling pathways affected by the hypoxia may help to overcome the low efficacy of traditional anticancer therapy for HMM patients.
In the present study, hypoxia enhanced the in vitro colony forming capability of HMM cells. Bcl-2 antagonization reduces in vitro clonogenicity through apoptosis induction [24, 25]. In this context, the present study showed that the increased Bcl-2 activity likely provided an additional survival advantage to individual HMM cells during colony formation in hypoxia. The effect of hypoxia on the proliferation of HMM cells in culture condition has been reported [26]. Hypoxia enhances tumor stemness by reprogramming non-stem cancer cells to be cancer stem cells (CSCs) with tumor-initiating capacity [27]. The increase of cells with high CD44 expression supports the notion that hypoxia enhanced the stemness of HMM cells [22, 23]. The transformation to CSCs is through the activation of HIFα and stemness-related transcriptional factors, including Oct4, c-Myc, and Notch [27]. In the present study, the enhanced clonogenicity of HMM cells might be associated with increased Oct4 expression, which was mediated through the transcriptional activity of HIF-2α. The upregulation of Oct4 at mRNA level in hypoxic condition contributes to the formation of more viable colonies with different origins of CSCs [28–30]. Heddleston et al. [31] demonstrated the functional significance of HIF-2α and Oct4 in the maintenance of the CSC state under hypoxia.
The weak correlation between Oct4 mRNA and protein expression may suggest the involvement of post-transcriptional modification of Oct4 and/or another stemness factors in enhancing the clonogenicity of HMM cells under hypoxia [32]. CSC factors like c-Myc or Notch are tightly regulated together with Oct4 by the competitive cooperation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in hypoxic tumor cells [33, 34]. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the functional relationship between HIFαs and stem cell factors including Oct4 in HMM cells. On the other hand, in the present study, once the HMM cells proliferated in high cell populations after completing colony formation, cell growth was decelerated by hypoxia. This phenomenon may be attributable to the insufficient supply of energy required for cellular proliferation under hypoxia. One of the principal actions of HIF-1α is to shift tumor metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to anaerobic glycolysis [8]. The hypoxic cancer cells consume more glucose by augmenting glucose influx through the upregulation of glucose transporters, such as Glut-1 [1, 5]. Accordingly, Glut-1 overexpression induced by hypoxia suggested the high energy demand or hypoxia-associated nutrient deprivation of HMM cells in this study. Because cell cycle arrest was not determined in hypoxia in this study, the process of protein synthesis could be inhibited, resulting in the decelerated proliferation of HMM cells, as previously suggested [26].
An acquired apoptosis resistance is closely associated with ineffective cancer therapy [3]. Hypoxia inhibits apoptosis in many cancer types following drug treatment [35]. The present study showed that HMM cells acquired a drug-resistant phenotype through inhibition of cisplatin-induced apoptosis under hypoxia. In particular, alteration of Bcl-2 might be responsible for the hypoxia-induced chemoresistance in HMM cells. The Bcl-2 family is a potential blocker of apoptosis and plays a key role in the drug resistance of multiple tumor types [36]. The anti-apoptosis by Bcl-2 is largely due to the inhibition of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, which can also be activated by pro-apoptotic molecules upon various stimuli that initiate apoptosis [37]. Due to its hydrophobic BH3 binding groove, Bcl-2 engages in multiple anti- and pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein-protein interactions, i.e., by binding and sequestering the pro-apoptotic Bax [37]. In this context, the increase of Bcl-2 expression relative to Bax may represent an aspect of hypoxia-induced drug resistance involved in mitochondrial protection upon exposure to cisplatin in HMM cells. In the present study, the role of Bcl-xL in promoting drug resistance under hypoxia is unclear. The inability of H513 cells to induce Bax expression in response to external stimuli may be attributable to the p53 mutation. It has been reported that tumor cells with mutant p53 do not induce Bax expression upon apoptotic stimuli [38]. This is consistent with the previous findings that H513 cells failed to induce Bax expression during TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis induced by a histone deacetylase inhibitor [39].
Similar to the previous study [40], hypoxia enhanced the migratory and invasive properties in HMM cells. Additionally, the present study showed that hypoxia promoted EMT process in HMM cells. In HMM, it was shown that the miR-205-mediated reduction of ZEB1 and ZEB2 increased the expression of E-cadherin, which inhibited migration and invasion [41]. The EMT is closely associated with hypoxia and is regulating a more aggressive behavior of cancer cells [42]. In HMM carcinogenesis, HIF-1α stabilization promotes EMT process and stemness via an increased expression of TGF-β and stem cell factors [21]. Moreover, EMT is associated with the emergence of CSCs in HMM cells [43]. Tumor hypoxia is known to recapitulate the HMM microenvironment of the body cavity with HIF-1α expression, and EMT has been potentially implicated in mesothelial carcinogenesis [44, 45]. HIF-1α regulates the expression of a variety of genes involved in EMT-triggering pathways, including TGF-β, Notch, and NF-κB, and EMT-promoting transcription factors, including Twist, Snail, Slug, and, Sip [42]. In the same vein, HIF-2α is also implicated in the stimulation of EMT-related factors, such as E-cadherin, LOX, CXCR4, Twist, and Zeb1 [7, 9, 42]. On the other hand, a published study showed that hypoxia induced mesenchymal to epithelial transition through the activation of HIF-2α in MSTO-211H cells, an HMM cell line [46]. Cell types and experimental conditions may be responsible for the distinct response to hypoxia with regard to the phenotypic change. Although further studies are required to determine the underlying mechanisms, EMT phenotypes under hypoxia can shed light on understanding how the hypoxic microenvironment governs the malignant progression of HMM.
Conclusion
Like other tumors, HMM contains significant areas of hypoxia, but little information is available on the relationship between hypoxia and tumor aggressiveness. The present study illustrated the importance of hypoxia in the progression of HMM cells. Understanding the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms affected by hypoxia may contribute to the development of therapeutic strategies targeting the microenvironmental influence on HMM biology.
Additional files
Acknowledgments
Funding
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant number: 2017R1A2B4008119) and the Brian Korea 21 Program, Research Institute of Veterinary Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary information file.
Abbreviations
- Bax
Bcl-2-associated X protein
- Bcl-2
B-cell lymphoma 2
- Bcl-xL
B-cell lymphoma-extra large
- CSCs
Cancer stem cells
- EMT
Epithelial to mesenchymal transition
- FITC
Fluorescence isothiocyanate
- Glut-1
Glucose transporter 1
- HIF-1/2α
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and 2 alpha
- HIF-1α
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha
- HIF-2α
Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha
- HIFα
Hypoxia-inducible factor alpha
- HMM
Human malignant mesothelioma
- MTT
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
- Oct4
Octamer-binding transcription factor 4
- PHD
Prolyl hydroxylases
- PI
Propidium iodide
Authors’ contributions
Contributed to conception or design: MCK and YK. Contributed to acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: MCK, SH, NYK, HSL, SJ, YY, and YK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Myung-Chul Kim, Email: kim881030@naver.com.
Sung-Hyun Hwang, Email: sh1669@snu.ac.kr.
Na-Yon Kim, Email: nayonstella@gmail.com.
Hong-Seok Lee, Email: hongs.lee90@gmail.com.
Sumin Ji, Email: suu0822@snu.ac.kr.
Yeseul Yang, Email: fmsyang@naver.com.
Yongbaek Kim, Phone: + 82 2 880 1273, Email: yongbaek@snu.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Ruan K, Song G, Ouyang G. Role of hypoxia in the hallmarks of human cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2009;107(6):1053–1062. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(4):937–949. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cosse J-P, Michiels C. Tumour hypoxia affects the responsiveness of cancer cells to chemotherapy and promotes cancer progression. Anti-Cancer Agent Me. 2008;8(7):790–797. doi: 10.2174/187152008785914798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metast Rev. 2007;26(2):225–239. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou J, Schmid T, Schnitzer S, Brüne B. Tumor hypoxia and cancer progression. Cancer Lett. 2006;237(1):10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee J-W, Bae S-H, Jeong J-W, Kim S-H, Kim K-W. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) α: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/emm.2004.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keith B, Johnson RS, Simon MC. HIF1α and HIF2α: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(1):9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc3183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Semenza GL. Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene. 2009;29(5):625–634. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qing G, Simon MC. Hypoxia inducible factor-2α: a critical mediator of aggressive tumor phenotypes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Covello KL, Kehler J, Yu H, Gordan JD, Arsham AM, Hu C-J, Labosky PA, Simon MC, Keith B. HIF-2α regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev. 2006;20(5):557–570. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA. Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet. 2005;366(9483):397–408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bianchi C, Bianchi T. Malignant mesothelioma: global incidence and relationship with asbestos. Ind Health. 2007;45(3):379–387. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.45.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mujoomdar AA, Tilleman TR, Richards WG, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ. Prevalence of in vitro chemotherapeutic drug resistance in primary malignant pleural mesothelioma: result in a cohort of 203 resection specimens. J Thorac Cardiov Sur. 2010;140(2):352–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fennell DA, Rudd RM. Defective core-apoptosis signalling in diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma: opportunities for effective drug development. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5(6):354–362. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01492-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blomberg C, Nilsson J, Holgersson G, Edlund P, Bergqvist M, Adwall L, Ekman S, Brattström D, Bergström S. Randomized trials of systemic medically-treated malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(5):2493–2501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fennell DA, Gaudino G, O'Byrne KJ, Mutti L, Van Meerbeeck J. Advances in the systemic therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5(3):136–147. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klabatsa A, Sheaff MT, Steele JP, Evans MT, Rudd RM, Fennell DA. Expression and prognostic significance of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) Lung Cancer. 2006;51(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Francis RJ, Segard T, Morandeau L, Lee YG, Millward MJ, Segal A, Nowak AK. Characterization of hypoxia in malignant pleural mesothelioma with FMISO PET-CT. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(1):55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, Van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Proto. 2006;1(5):2315. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jampel HD. Effect of brief exposure to mitomycin C on viability and proliferation of cultured human Tenon's capsule fibroblasts. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(9):1471–1476. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31781-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim M-C, Cui F-J, Kim Y. Hydrogen peroxide promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and stemness in human malignant mesothelioma cells. Asian Pac J Cancer P. 2013;14(6):3625–3630. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ghani FI, Yamazaki H, Iwata S, Okamoto T, Aoe K, Okabe K, Mimura Y, Fujimoto N, Kishimoto T, Yamada T. Identification of cancer stem cell markers in human malignant mesothelioma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;404(2):735–742. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cortes-Dericks L, Froment L, Boesch R, Schmid RA, Karoubi G. Cisplatin-resistant cells in malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines show ALDH high CD44+ phenotype and sphere-forming capacity. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cao W, Yacoub S, Shiverick KT, Namiki K, Sakai Y, Porvasnik S, Urbanek C, Rosser CJ. Dichloroacetate (DCA) sensitizes both wild-type and over expressing Bcl-2 prostate cancer cells in vitro to radiation. Prostate. 2008;68(11):1223–1231. doi: 10.1002/pros.20788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Campos L, Sabido O, Rouault J-P, Guyotat D. Effects of BCL-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides on in vitro proliferation and survival of normal marrow progenitors and leukemic cells. Blood. 1994;84(2):595–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goudarzi H, Hida Y, Takano H, Teramae H, Iizasa H. Hamada J-i. Hypoxia affects in vitro growth of newly established cell lines from patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Biomedl Res. 2013;34(1):13–21. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.34.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mimeault M, Batra SK. Hypoxia-inducing factors as master regulators of stemness properties and altered metabolism of cancer-and metastasis-initiating cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(1):30–54. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ma Y, Liang D, Liu J, Axcrona K, Kvalheim G, Stokke T, Nesland JM, Suo Z. Prostate cancer cell lines under hypoxia exhibit greater stem-like properties. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Li P, Zhou C, Xu L, Xiao H. Hypoxia enhances stemness of cancer stem cells in glioblastoma: an in vitro study. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(4):399. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yeung TM, Gandhi SC, Bodmer WF. Hypoxia and lineage specification of cell line-derived colorectal cancer stem cells. P Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(11):4382–4387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014519107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Heddleston JM, Li Z, McLendon RE, Hjelmeland AB, Rich JN. The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(20):3274–3284. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.20.9701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saxe JP, Tomilin A, Schöler HR, Plath K, Huang J. Post-translational regulation of Oct4 transcriptional activity. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gordan JD, Bertout JA, Hu C-J, Diehl JA, Simon MC. HIF-2α promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(4):335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hu Y-Y, Fu L-A, Li S-Z, Chen Y, Li J-C, Han J, Liang L, Li L, Ji C-C, Zheng M-H. Hif-1α and Hif-2α differentially regulate notch signaling through competitive interaction with the intracellular domain of notch receptors in glioma stem cells. Cancer Lett. 2014;349(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rohwer N, Cramer T. Hypoxia-mediated drug resistance: novel insights on the functional interaction of HIFs and cell death pathways. Drug Resist Update. 2011;14(3):191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gross A, McDonnell JM, Korsmeyer SJ. BCL-2 family members and the mitochondria in apoptosis. Genes Dev. 1999;13(15):1899–1911. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.15.1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brunelle JK, Letai A. Control of mitochondrial apoptosis by the Bcl-2 family. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(4):437–441. doi: 10.1242/jcs.031682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Toshiyuki M, Reed JC. Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene. Cell. 1995;80(2):293–299. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Reddy RM, Yeow W-S, Chua A, Nguyen DM, Baras A, Ziauddin MF, Shamimi-Noori SM, Maxhimer JB, Schrump DS, Nguyen DM. Rapid and profound potentiation of Apo2L/TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis in thoracic cancer cells by the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin a: the essential role of the mitochondria-mediated caspase activation cascade. Apoptosis. 2007;12(1):55–71. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-0484-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goudarzi H, Iizasa H, Furuhashi M, Nakazawa S, Nakane R, Liang S, Hida Y, Yanagihara K, Kubo T, Nakagawa K. Enhancement of in vitro cell motility and invasiveness of human malignant pleural mesothelioma cells through the HIF-1α-MUC1 pathway. Cancer Lett. 2013;339(1):82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fassina A, Cappellesso R, Guzzardo V, Dalla Via L, Piccolo S, Ventura L, Fassan M. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in malignant mesothelioma. Modern Pathol. 2012;25(1):86–99. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jiang J, Tang Y-L, Liang X-H. EMT: a new vision of hypoxia promoting cancer progression. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11(8):714–723. doi: 10.4161/cbt.11.8.15274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Casarsa C, Bassani N, Ambrogi F, Zabucchi G, Boracchi P, Biganzoli E, Coradini D. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, cell polarity and stemness-associated features in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Lett. 2011;302(2):136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Klabatsa A, Sheaff M, Steele J, Evans M, Rudd R, Fennell D. Expression and prognostic significance of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) Lung Cancer. 2006;51(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schramm A, Opitz I, Thies S, Seifert B, Moch H, Weder W, Soltermann A. Prognostic significance of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 2010;37(3):566–572. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Manente AG, Pinton G, Zonca S, Tavian D, Habib T, Jithesh PV, Fennell D, Nilsson S, Moro L. KDM6B histone demethylase is an epigenetic regulator of estrogen receptor β expression in human pleural mesothelioma. Epigenomics. 2016;8(9):1227–1238. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary information file.