Skip to main content
Melanoma Management logoLink to Melanoma Management
. 2014 Sep 5;1(1):41–46. doi: 10.2217/mmt.14.12

No one should die of melanoma: a vision or impossible mission?

Iris Zalaudek 1,1,*, Elvira Moscarella 2,2, Caterina Longo 2,2, Aimilios Lallas 2,2, Giuseppe Argenziano 2,2, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof 1,1
PMCID: PMC6094643  PMID: 30190809

SUMMARY 

While the incidence of early-stage melanoma has dramatically increased over the past decades, the incidence and mortality rates of thick melanomas have remained relatively stable during the same period. A number of alternative theories have been postulated in order to explain these divergent trends between thin and thick melanomas, among which is the question of whether nodular melanoma may originate in the dermis. This concept has gained support from recent improvements in the understanding of the origin of melanocytes and the morphological and molecular diversity of melanoma. A dermal origin would plausibly explain why efforts at improving the early detection of melanoma largely fail, as it implies an initially intradermal growth that is hidden from our eyes until clinical signs and symptoms become only secondarily apparent. In light of this, at the current stage, the vision that no one should die of melanoma is an impossible mission.

KEYWORDS: diagnosis, epidemiology, melanoma, melanomagenesis, screening


Practice points.

  • There has been a significant rise in the incidence of thin melanomas, while the incidence of thick melanomas has remained relatively stable.

  • This divergent trend may be explained by a dermal origin for thick, fast-growing melanomas, making current screening efforts in order to improve their early detection impossible.

  • Cutaneous melanoma can be collected into three main histogenetic groups with peculiar epidemiological, morphological and molecular characteristics.

  • The traditional unifying model of melanoma progression suggests that all melanomas derive from malignant transformed epidermal melanocytes.

  • The traditional model of melanoma progression does not plausibly explain some of the striking differences between the nodular and superficial spreading melanoma subtypes.

  • An alternative model of melanomagenesis suggests that nodular melanoma, superficial melanoma and lentigo maligna derive from melanocytes located in the dermis, epidermis and hair follicles, respectively.

  • Melanocyte specification, maturation and migration from the neural crest is a progressive process following a defined direction.

  • Human skin at birth contains cells with different melanocyte specifications at different levels of the skin, including the dermis, epidermis and the hair follicles.

  • Recent insights into clinical morphology, including histopathology and reflectance confocal microscopy, support the notion of an intradermal origin of nodular melanoma.

  • Recent data from molecular research support the notion that nodular melanoma is a distinct entity.

  • A dermal origin of melanoma implies that current screening strategies are insufficient to enable early diagnosis.

Background

• Trends in melanoma epidemiology

Melanoma incidence has dramatically increased over the past decades, which has led to a call for this phenomenon to be labeled a ‘melanoma epidemic’. However, the significant rise in incidence is mainly observed only for early-stage melanomas, while the incidence and mortality rates of thick melanomas have remained relatively stable over the same period [1–6].

Although some believe that the epidemic of thin melanomas is the result of improved screening and surveillance, allowing for an earlier diagnosis of melanoma, this explanation largely fails to explain the stable incidence and mortality rates of thick melanomas. In fact, if screening has resulted in an earlier detection of all melanomas, the incidence and mortality of thick melanomas should, after an initial increase, subsequently decrease. However, this is not the trend that has been observed [2,5–6].

• Theories to explain the melanoma epidemiology

Accordingly, a number of alternative theories have been postulated in order to explain the divergent trends between thin and thick melanomas. Among these are the rising detection of biologically indolent melanomas that would never have affected overall survival, shifts among histopathologists towards overdiagnosis of melanoma, medicolegal issues, length time bias and the provocative question as to whether thick, fast-growing melanomas originate in the dermis and, as a consequence, their initial proliferation is hidden from our eyes, making current efforts to improve the early diagnosis of melanoma into an impossible mission [1–2,7–10].

Melanoma classification

It must be admitted that the term ‘cutaneous melanoma’ encompasses a heterogeneous subset of malignant melanocytic proliferations that differ significantly with respect to their epidemiology, morphology, growth dynamics, genetics and potential to metastasize [11–13]. Even though the classification of cutaneous melanoma is an evolving science and, as a result, different schemes are applied for the classification of melanoma, cutaneous melanomas can be assigned into three main groups.

• Slow-growing melanoma

Slow- or very-slow-growing melanomas (classically referred to as superficial spreading or lentiginous types) show the strongest increase in incidence across time and are associated with intermittent sun exposure, a high nevus count and BRAF mutations. This melanoma subtype is clinically characterized by the classical ABCDE criteria (A: asymmetry; B: border irregularity; C: color variegations; D: diameter >5 mm; and E: evolution over time) and, upon dermoscopy, commonly reveals pigmented patterns, such as a network and regression [13–15]. Regression is a histopathological feature due to fibrosis and melanophages, which appears dermoscopically as white structureless areas with gray dots or gray hue.

• Fast-growing melanoma

Thick, fast-growing melanomas (often referred to as nodular melanomas) show a stable incidence across time and are not associated with sun exposure, a high number of nevi and freckles and BRAF mutations [11]. In contrast to slow-growing melanoma, this melanoma subtype often presents clinically as symmetric, pigmented or nonpigmented firm and rapidly growing nodules with well-defined borders. Accordingly, the EFG rule (E: elevation; F: firm on palpation; and G: continuous growth for >1 month) has been proposed for its clinical diagnosis [16]. Dermoscopically, fast-growing melanomas lack recognizable pigmented structures, but have structureless blue and black colors or, in the case of amelanotic melanoma, atypical vascular patterns [17–19].

• Lentigo maligna

Classical lentigo maligna shows an increasing incidence across time and is associated with chronic sun exposure, but not with a high nevus count or BRAF mutations. Similarly to slow- or very-slow-growing melanomas, lentigo maligna is typified by a long-lasting in situ growth phase. Accordingly, it can acquire a significant, large diameter over time [11,20].

Traditional concepts of melanomagenesis and progression

Regardless of the striking differences between these three main groups of melanoma, many still agree with the traditional unifying model of melanoma progression. This model postulates that all melanomas derive from malignant transformed epidermal melanocytes, which initially proliferate along the basal layer (melanoma in situ) before acquiring the ability to invade into the dermis (invasive melanoma). According to this model, the only determinant defining whether a melanoma will grow rapidly and cause death or not is the time needed by the transformed cells to change their horizontal growth into vertical growth. However, this epidermal origin model of melanoma fails to address why nodular melanoma commonly presents as symmetric, well-defined nodules in the absence of a lateral in situ component, why it is commonly amelanotic, why it shows a predilection for the head/neck region, why it grows so much faster than any other subtype and why all of the screening improvements have not affected its early detection. Recent improvements in the understanding of the origin, migration and maturation of melanocytes during embryogenesis, along with novel insights into the morphological diversity of nevi and melanomas using dermoscopy, digital dermoscopic follow-up and reflectance confocal microscopy, have led to an alternative model that suggests that nodular melanomas may originate from malignant transformed melanocytes in the dermis [10].

The making of a melanocyte

• Melanocyte origin

The current understanding is that melanocytes differentiate from the neural crest, which is a transient population of cells that delaminates from the neural tube and migrates extensively throughout the embryo during vertebrate development. Melanocyte specification from neural crest precursors is a progressive process during which initially pluripotent cells become restricted to the melanogenic lineage and adopt the gene expression profile and morphology of melanocytes. This specification process is governed by a variety of signaling molecules and pathways [21].

Once the melanogenic fate has been determined, melanoblasts (i.e., melanocyte precursors) migrate mostly along the dorsolateral pathway into the developing skin, whereby they progressively acquire pigment-producing capabilities (i.e., maturation) and the shape of melanocytes. The sequence of melanoblast migration into the skin therefore follows a timely, well-defined intradermal (6–8th gestational week), intraepithelial (12–13th gestational week), intrafollicular (15–17th gestational week) and cephalocaudal and dorsoventral progression [22].

• Melanocytes in human skin

Remarkably, it has been shown that by the end of gestation, dermal melanocytes have disappeared apart from in three anatomic regions: the head/neck, the dorsal aspects of the extremities and the presacral region, in which cells with markers of melanoblasts reside in the dermis even after completion of the intrafollicular migration stage [22]. Accordingly, the human skin contains melanocytic cells at different stages of migration and maturation at different levels of the skin, including in the dermis. This finding supports the notion that some melanocytic tumors, including intradermal nevi and nodular melanomas, may arise from a proliferation of cells with melanocytic lineage in the dermis [23]. Further support for a dermal origin of nodular melanoma is provided by morphologic studies using histopathology, dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, which is a noninvasive, in vivo diagnostic tool that enables the visualization of the skin at a cellular level [24–26].

Lessons from clinical morphology

Several lines of evidence prove that both intradermal nevi of the Miescher type and nodular melanomas have a remarkable predilection for the head/neck area [27–32].

• Histopathology

In this context, a study by Dadzie et al. is of particular interest, in which the authors reported the presence of clinically unapparent, incidental small nevic aggregates in the dermis of normal skin from pathology specimens obtained from excisions [24]. Notably, these dermal nevic aggregates were most commonly observed in specimens from the head and neck area. It appears possible that both intradermal nevi of the Miescher type and also nodular melanomas may originate from a proliferation of these small dermal aggregates.

• Noninvasive skin imaging techniques

Other intriguing observations have been provided by studies using reflectance confocal microscopy. Segura et al. compared the confocal and histopathological findings between nodular melanomas and secondary nodular superficial spreading melanomas [25]. Remarkably, they found only sparse pagetoid spread and a relatively preserved epidermis over nodular melanomas, while nodules arising secondarily in superficial spreading melanoma subtypes were typified by a marked epidermal disarrangement and abundant pagetoid infiltration.

This observation has been recently confirmed by another confocal study in which the authors investigated the confocal–histopathological correlates in a series of pigmented nodular melanomas that had been dermoscopically characterized only by their blue and black color [26]. Notably, in this study, the authors noticed a significantly thinned epidermis overlying a massive infiltrate of dermal atypical melanocytes. Accordingly, the authors speculate that ulceration in nodular melanomas may appear secondary to the constant epidermal extension and thinning of the upward bulging of rapidly proliferating dermal cells.

Lessons from basic research

Besides these new insights into clinical morphology, recent data from basic research also support the notion that nodular melanoma is a distinct biological entity [33].

• MAPK pathway

Much research has focused on the oncogenic mutations involved in the MAPK pathway (RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK), which has been identified to be a critical growth pathway in melanocytic tumors. Notably, mutually exclusive oncogenic mutations in NRAS, BRAF and HRAS, as well as those involving the GNAQ gene, occur at variable frequencies in both nevi and melanomas and appear to be linked to specific histogenetic and morphological tumor characteristics [34–37].

Oncogenic BRAF is the most common mutation among all melanomas, but it occurs at the highest frequency in melanomas of the superficial spreading subtype. By contrast, other types of melanoma, including fast-growing nodular melanomas and blue melanomas (often contradictorily referred to as malignant blue nevi) display mutations in other genes, such as NRAS or GNAQ, respectively [33,36–37]. Of particular interest in the discussion regarding a dermal origin of nodular melanomas are the findings that large to intermediate congenital nevi and blue nevi, which are widely accepted as originating in the dermis, frequently harbor mutations in NRAS and GNAQ, respectively [23,38–40].

• Stem cell markers

Of further interest is a study showing that nestin, a neural stem cell marker, was highly expressed among amelanotic and pigmented nodular melanomas (up to 80%), whereas its expression was only seen in a minority of melanomas of the superficial spreading type [41,42].

Conclusion

While it is increasingly being accepted that benign melanocytic proliferations such as intradermal nevi, large to intermediate congenital nevi and blue nevi originate in the dermis, many still do not believe in a dermal origin of melanoma. However, it must be recognized that there are several lines of evidence in support of a dermal origin of nodular melanomas. Although this concept remains speculative, it provides plausible answers to some of the key questions that remain unanswered by the traditional concept of melanomagenesis. For example, the fact that nodular melanomas may derive from not fully developed and matured melanocytes in the dermis could well explain why they are commonly amelanotic, as these cells have not acquired the capability to produce pigment. This also explains why they grow so much faster, as not fully matured cells have a higher proliferative capacity than fully matured dendritic cells. It also explains why nodular melanomas commonly present as symmetric nodules, as they lack any epidermal involvement, and why they are biologically much more aggressive, because they grow in a microenvironment that has a high vascular supply and a lack of proliferation-controlling keratinocytes. Finally, this concept also explains why all efforts at improving the early detection of nodular melanomas have largely failed, as they initially grow while they are hidden from our eyes until the proliferating cells acquire enough volume to give a secondary rise to clinical signs and symptoms.

Future perspective

In light of these findings, the vision that no one should die of melanoma [43] is, at the current stage, an impossible mission.

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest

  • 1.Flórez A, Cruces M. Melanoma epidemic: true or false? Int. J. Dermatol. 2004;43:405–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beddingfield FC. The melanoma epidemic: res ipsa loquitur. Oncologist. 2003;8:459–465. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geller AC, Clapp RW, Sober AJ, et al. Melanoma epidemic: an analysis of six decades of data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:4172–4178. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Melanoma thickness trends in the United States, 1988–2006. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010;130:793–797. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Linos E, Swetter SM, Cockburn MG, Colditz GA, Clarke CA. Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009;129(7):1666–1674. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bordoni A, Leoni-Parvex S, Peverelli S, Mazzola P, Mazzucchelli L, Spitale A. Opportunistic screening strategy for cutaneous melanoma does not change the incidence of nodular and thick lesions nor reduce mortality: a population-based descriptive study in the European region with the highest incidence. Melanoma Res. 2013 doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328363b015. doi:10.1097/CMR.0b013e328363b015. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dennis LK. Analysis of the melanoma epidemic, both apparent and real: data from the 1973 through 1994 surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program registry. Arch. Dermatol. 1999;135:275–280. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Glusac EJ. The melanoma ‘epidemic’, a dermatopathologist’s perspective. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2011;38:264–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:605–613. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Critical review of cancer diagnosis in oncology.
  • 10.Zalaudek I, Marghoob AA, Scope A, et al. Three roots of melanoma. Arch. Dermatol. 2008;144:1375–1379. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • First proposal of a dermal origin of melanoma.
  • 11.Lipsker D, Engel F, Cribier B, Velten M, Hedelin G. Trends in melanoma epidemiology suggest three different types of melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007;157:338–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08029.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • New classification proposal for melanomas.
  • 12.Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G. Fast-growing and slow-growing melanomas. Arch. Dermatol. 2007;143:802–803. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.6.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Argenziano G, Kittler H, Ferrara G, et al. Slow-growing melanoma: a dermoscopy follow-up study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010;162:267–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abbasi NR, Shaw HM, Rigel DS, et al. Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria. JAMA. 2004;292:2771–2776. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Terushkin V, Dusza SW, Scope A, et al. Changes observed in slow-growing melanomas during long-term dermoscopic monitoring. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012;166:1213–1220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10846.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chamberlain A, Ng J. Cutaneous melanoma – atypical variants and presentations. Aust. Fam. Physician. 2009;38:476–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Argenziano G, Longo C, Cameron A, et al. Blue-black rule: a simple dermoscopic clue to recognize pigmented nodular melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011;165:1251–1255. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalkhoran S, Milne O, Zalaudek I, et al. Historical, clinical, and dermoscopic characteristics of thin nodular melanoma. Arch. Dermatol. 2010;146:311–318. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J, Ferrara G, Catricalà C, Argenziano G. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part I. Melanocytic skin tumors. J. Am. Dermatol. 2010;63:361–374. 375–376. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.698. quiz. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ferrara G, Ligrone L, Zalaudek I, Mordente I, Argenziano G. Lentigo maligna in a young adult. Dermatology. 2008;217:66–68. doi: 10.1159/000125549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thomas AJ, Erickson CA. The making of a melanocyte: the specification of melanoblasts from the neural crest. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2008;21:598–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2008.00506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Excellent summary on the current state of knowledge regarding melanocyte specification.
  • 22.Gleason B, Crum C, Murphy G. Expression patterns of MITF during human cutaneous embryogenesis: evidence for bulge epithelial expression and persistence of dermal melanoblasts. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2008;35(7):615–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00881.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Study showing that melanoblasts reside in the dermis.
  • 23.Zalaudek I, Catricalà C, Moscarella E, Argenziano G. What dermoscopy tells us about nevogenesis. J. Dermatol. 2011;38:16–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.01141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dadzie OE, Goerig R, Bhawan J. Incidental microscopic foci of nevic aggregates in skin. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2008;30:45–50. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e31815f9854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Segura S, Pellacani G, Puig S, et al. In vivo microscopic features of nodular melanomas: dermoscopy, confocal microscopy, and histopathologic correlates. Arch. Dermatol. 2008;144:1311–1320. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • First study showing a lack of epidermal involvement in nodular melanomas.
  • 26.Longo C, Farnetani F, Moscarella E, et al. Can noninvasive imaging tools potentially predict the risk of ulceration in invasive melanomas showing blue and black colors? Melanoma Res. 2013;23:125–131. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32835d90b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cox NH, Aitchison TC, Sirel JM, MacKie RM. Comparison between lentigo maligna melanoma and other histogenetic types of malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Scottish Melanoma Group. Br. J. Cancer. 1996;73:940–944. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoersch B, Leiter U, Garbe C. Is head and neck melanoma a distinct entity? A clinical registry-based comparative study in 5702 patients with melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006;155:771–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chamberlain AJ, Fritschi L, Giles GG, Dowling JP, Kelly JW. Nodular type and older age as the most significant associations of thick melanoma in Victoria, Australia. Arch. Dermatol. 2002;138:609–614. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.5.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu W, Kelly JW, Trivett M, et al. Distinct clinical and pathological features are associated with the BRAF T1799A(V600E) mutation in primary melanoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007;127:900–905. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu W, Dowling JP, Murray WK, et al. Rate of growth in melanomas: characteristics and associations of rapidly growing melanomas. Arch. Dermatol. 2006;142:1551–1558. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.12.1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Witt C, Krengel S. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of subtypes of melanocytic nevi (Flat nevi, Miescher nevi, Unna nevi) Dermatol Online J. 2010;16:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Greenwald HS, Friedman EB, Osman I. Superficial spreading and nodular melanoma are distinct biological entities: a challenge to the linear progression model. Melanoma Res. 2012;22:1–8. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32834e6aa0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Excellent review of the clinical and molecular differences between nodular and superficial spreading melanoma.
  • 34.Scolyer RA, Long GV, Thompson JF. Evolving concepts in melanoma classification and their relevance to multidisciplinary melanoma patient care. Mol. Oncol. 2011;5:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Viros A, Fridlyand J, Bauer J, et al. Improving melanoma classification by integrating genetic and morphologic features. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Raamsdonk CD, Bezrookove V, Green G, et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature. 2008;457:599–602. doi: 10.1038/nature07586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Andrew L. Molecular nevogenesis. Dermatol Res. Pract. 2011;2011:463184. doi: 10.1155/2011/463184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Excellent review of how molecular alterations correlate with morphology.
  • 38.Emley A, Nguyen LP, Yang S, Mahalingam M. Somatic mutations in GNAQ in amelanotic/hypomelanotic blue nevi. Hum. Pathol. 2011;42:136–140. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bender RP, McGinniss MJ, Esmay P, Velazquez EF, Reimann JD. Identification of HRAS mutations and absence of GNAQ or GNA11 mutations in deep penetrating nevi. Mod. Pathol. 2013;26:1320–1328. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bauer J, Curtin JA, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Congenital melanocytic nevi frequently harbor NRAS mutations but no BRAF mutations. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007;127:179–182. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ladstein RG, Bachmann IM, Straume O, Akslen LA. Nestin expression is associated with aggressive cutaneous melanoma of the nodular type. Mod. Pathol. 2014;27(3):396–401. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kanoh M, Amoh Y, Tanabe K, Maejima H, Takasu H, Katsuoka K. Nestin is expressed in HMB-45 negative melanoma cells in dermal parts of nodular melanoma. J. Dermatol. 2010;37:505–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ackerman AB. No one should die of malignant melanoma. J. Am. Dermatol. 1985;12:115–116. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)80242-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Melanoma Management are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES