SUMMARY
The genetic risk factors for melanoma are complex and involve both familial and environmental components. Of the thousands of melanomas diagnosed each year, only a fraction are due to familial causes. These melanomas typically present in younger individuals, and may be associated with genetic factors that put these individuals at risk for other tumors. CDKN2A and CDK4 are the most well-characterized mutations, as they have been identified in up to 40% of familial melanomas. Individuals with CDKN2A are also at risk for pancreatic cancer. The BRCA2 mutation has also been implicated in familial melanomas, breast and ovarian cancer. The BAP1, TERC and POT1 mutations are associated with melanomas and several other familial tumors.
KEYWORDS : BAP1, BRCA2, CDK4, CDKN2A, genetics, melanoma, POT1, TERC
Practice points.
Background
Several genes have been implicated in familial melanoma and associated tumors.
CDKN2A & CDK4
CDKN2A and CDK4 are the most well studied, and are implicated in up to 40% of cases of familial melanomas.
BAP1, TERT & POT1
Use of whole-exome sequencing has helped scientists to identify several new genes responsible for familial melanoma and associated tumors over the past 5 years.
BAP1, TERT and POT1 are recently identified genes associated with melanoma and other tumors.
Future perspective
Identification of mutations in individuals with cutaneous melanoma should prompt both cancer screening for tumors associated with that specific gene.
Because only a small number of families with these gene mutations have been identified thus far, clear recommendations for cancer screening have not been established. Thus, a thorough patient and family history is imperative in a patient suspected of having familial melanoma, as well as referral to a geneticist with expertise in inherited tumor syndromes.
Identification of these new genes causing familial melanoma and associated tumors theoretically offers possible targets for new drug therapies in the future.
The incidence of melanoma has increased steadily over the past 20 years, drawing increased focus to this skin cancer and associated tumors [1–3]. Although approximately 2% of the population will be diagnosed with melanoma in their lifetime, only a handful of these people will develop melanoma due to familial syndromes [4,5]. Familial melanoma is estimated to account for approximately one-tenth of all newly diagnosed cases [6]. Over the past decade, development of linkage analysis, positional cloning and genome-wide molecular sequences techniques have allowed researchers to identify mutations in new target genes responsible for familial melanomas. Understanding specific gene mutations provide potential targets for drug therapies, guiding researchers responsible for developing novel medications for melanoma.
Of the genes responsible for melanoma associated with familial tumors, CDKN2A was one of the earliest identified [5,7,8]. This melanoma susceptibility gene, along with CDK4, accounts for the majority of familial melanoma cases. In recent years, BRCA2, BAP1, TERT and POT1 have also been identified as playing a significant role in familial melanoma syndromes. The objective of this study is to review familial melanoma and associated cancers.
Molecular basis for development of melanoma
On the cellular level, melanoma arises from uncontrolled mitosis of melanocytes, which are derived from neural crest cells. In addition to the skin, melanocytes are found in the uveal tract (choroid, ciliary body, iris), cochlear and leptomeninges. Through use of extensive genome analysis and other laboratory technologies, scientists have elucidated several pathways and high-risk loci which contribute to the development of melanoma. Alternations in these pathway and loci are categorized as genetic, such as amplifications, deletions, mutations, translocations and epigenetic, such as promoter hypermethylation [5]. The development of melanoma initiates with a ‘driver’ event in which an instigating epigenetic or genetic factor initiates tumor development [9]. Afterwards, ‘passenger’ events represent additional insults to the genome or molecular pathways which propagate the erroneous sequence of events leading to the development of melanoma [5]. The interplay between the molecular basis of melanoma and environmental factors such as UV light still remains to be elucidated [10,11]. Mutations in melanogenesis pathways result in a high familial risk of tumor development.
CDKN2A
• Epidemiology
The CDKN2A pathway was one of the first pathways elucidated to be related to melanoma development [12]. On the molecular level, CDKN2A is a tumor suppressor that encodes two different proteins produced by alternative reading frames: p16INK4a and p14ARF. P16INK4a (exons 1a, 2, 3) is a cell cycle inhibitory protein, whereas p14ARF (exons 1b, 2, 3) induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [6]. Mutations in this gene are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, albeit with variable penetrance. Exons 1a and 2 are most commonly mutated in those with melanoma [6].
Worldwide, approximately 40% of familial melanoma cases have CDKN2A mutations. Geographically, this mutation was found in 20% of families with melanoma in Australia, 45% of families with melanoma in North America, and 57% of families with melanoma in Europe [13,14]. Approximately 10–15% of people with melanoma and no family history were also found to have germline CDKN2A mutations [15].
Additional factors can predict a higher risk in those carrying this gene mutation for people living in sun-exposed countries. These risk factors include UV exposure, increased number of family members with melanoma, early median age at melanoma diagnosis, history of pancreatic cancer in a family member and multiple melanomas in the same patient [14,16–19]. The penetrance in individuals with CDKN2A mutations also varies geographically, with varying clinical features and melanoma risk [16,20,21]. However, vigilance with monitoring at-risk patients is necessary, given the high risk of developing an aggressive melanoma [22].
• Associated tumors
Clinically, carriers of germline CDKN2A mutations may display increased nevi, as CDKN2A is nevogenic. Those with CDKN2A mutations were also found to have more freckling and increased number of nevi on the buttocks and feet. Overall nevi number on the whole body is typically >100 [23]. A CDKN2A mutation is associated with the familial atypical mole and melanoma (FAMMM syndrome), in which individuals are at a higher risk of developing both multiple melanomas and pancreatic cancer [24]. In families with the CDKN2A mutation, the diversity of clinical presentation is impressive. While multiple melanomas predominated as the primary tumor type in some families, early- or late-onset pancreatic cancer predominated in other families. Some individuals with CDKN2A mutations may also develop primary sarcomas, lung, head and neck, breast and esophageal cancers [25–27]. Individuals may also be more susceptible to tobacco-related carcinogens, given the elevated risks of lung, head and neck and esophageal tumors [26].
CDK4
• Epidemiology
The CDK4 gene is closely related to the CDKN2A gene, as both act on the same molecular pathway. As a result, both confer high risks for development of melanoma. CDK4 encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase, which functions in controlling progression through the cell cycle (G1 phase) [28]. Most mutations in CD4K have been reported on codon 24 of exon 2, resulting in a substitution of arginine for histadine. This substitution results in a defective p16INK4a binding domain, leading to progression of the cell cycle since P16INK4a normally acts to inhibit the cell cycle [29]. Similar to CDKN2A, mutations in CDK4 are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. In contrast, germline mutations of CDK4 are rare, with less than 20 known families in the literature [29,30].
• Associated tumors
Phenotypically, individuals with CDK4 mutations cannot be distinguished from those with CDKN2A mutations [29,31]. Both mutations are characterized by numerous atypical nevi and multiple primary melanomas. Due to the rarity of germline CDK4 mutations, the data on associated tumors are based on only 17 families with 103 members. Tumors afflicting these 17 families include keratinocyte carcinomas (basal and squamous cell carcinoma), breast, ovarian, cervical, gastrointestinal (including pancreatic), lung, prostate cancer and lymphomas [29].
BRCA
• Epidemiology
Although the BRCA1/2 genes are better known to be associated with breast cancer, BRCA2 carriers are also at increased risk for ocular and cutaneous melanoma [32]. BRCA2 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in DNA repair. It was first identified in the mid-1990s from large cohorts of women with a history of breast cancer [33]. Since then, these genes have been associated with a variety of tumors, and BRCA2 is estimated to play a role in approximately 3% of individuals who develop ocular melanoma [34].
• Associated tumors
In an analysis of the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium, BRCA2 carriers had an 84% risk of developing breast cancer and a 27% probability of developing ovarian cancer by the age of 70 [35]. Furthermore, BRCA2 has been associated with prostate, pancreatic, gallbladder/bile duct, nasopharyngeal and stomach tumors. Of these tumors, the risk of gallbladder/bile duct tumors is the highest, with a relative risk of 5. The relative risk of developing prostate cancer is 4.7, while the risk of developing hepatic cancer is 4.2 [32,36].
BAP1
• Epidemiology
BAP1 is a recently described gene in which mutations are associated with a high risk of melanoma and other tumors [37,38]. Truncating mutations on chromosome 3 are responsible for a significant number of cases reported in the literature. This tumor suppressor gene likely has a role in cell proliferation and inhibition of growth [39]. Its interaction with host-cell factor-1 may play a role in its inhibition of growth [39]. Additionally, germline mutations have identified mutations in the C-terminus of the protein, suggesting that the interaction with the BRCA1 binding domain may also play a key role in carcinogenesis [40].
BAP1 mutations are associated with uveal melanomas, with mutations seen in almost 50% of uveal melanomas [6,39,41]. Affected individuals tend to develop tumors at an early age. Additionally, the BAP1 mutation is found in more than 80% of uveal melanoma metastasis [6]. Recent studies have also shown associations with cutaneous melanomas and atypical nevoid melanoma-like melanocytic proliferations, melanocytic intradermal proliferations, Spitz tumors and cutaneous nevoid melanomas [40,42,43].
• Associated tumors
In addition to cutaneous and uveal melanomas, individuals with BAP1 mutations can develop a wide variety of tumors. These include mesothelioma, cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, meningiomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas [39,42,44,45]. Of these tumors, the association with melanomas and mesotheliomas appear to be the strongest. In a study of two American families with mesotheliomas and no known environmental risk factors, both were found to have frameshift BAP1 mutations [46]. These families also presented with a history of uveal melanomas and cutaneous melanomas. In another study of 53 subjects with BAP1 mutations, several were also found to have mesotheliomas and melanomas [39]. Several other studies have also supported this association [43,46,47].
TERT
• Epidemiology
Mutations in the promoter region of TERT, or telomerase reverse transcriptase, can lead to multiple cutaneous melanomas. TERT encodes a catalytic subunit of telomerase. Mutations in TERT creates new binding motifs for Ets transcription factors and ternary complex factors close to the start of transcription. When mutated, it can result in up to a twofold increase in transcription [48]. TERT promoter mutations were identified in linkage studies of families with a high incidence of metastatic melanoma. UV signature mutations (cytidine to thymidine at a dipyrimidine motif) were also detected in the TERT promotor regions in families with a strong history of melanoma [38,39].
TERT promotor region dysregulation may serve as the ‘driver’ event in the development of melanoma. These mutations also showed a combined frequency that was higher than BRAF and NRAS mutations, which are well-known melanoma drivers [49]. Additionally, telomerase's role in tumorigenesis has previously been well-established, although its exact function in dvelopment of melanoma is unclear.
• Associated tumors
In addition to melanoma, several tumors have been associated with TERT promotor region mutations, including hematological malignancies, gliomas, lung cancer, keratinocyte carcinomas, pancreatic cancer, prostate breast, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [48,50–53]. Cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas with TERT mutations show UV signature mutations, suggesting a significant role for UV exposure in the pathogenesis of TERT-related cutaneous malignancies [50]. It is unclear whether melanoma predisposes patients to other high-risk tumors, or whether these tumors are solely a result of the underlying TERT mutation.
POT1
• Epidemiology
This high-risk melanoma susceptibility gene was identified using whole-exome sequencing of five affected families living in Romagna, Italy [54]. A missense variant in the protection of telomeres 1 gene (POT1) was identified in all individuals with cutaneous melanoma. POT1 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with incomplete penetrance [54]. Carriers of POT1 mutations showed increased telomere lengths, suggesting that telomere maintenance is affected in these individuals [54].
• Associated tumors
In families with POT1 mutations, several associated tumors have been reported. These include uterine cancer, astrocytoma, prostate cancer, breast cancer, small cell lung cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [55]. The link between POT1 and CLL is the most well established, and was identified through whole exome sequencing in patients with CLL. In a study of 214 individuals with CLL, 5% of subjects were found to have recurrent POT1 somatic mutations, making it one of the most frequently mutated genes in this hematologic malignancy [56]. In CLL cells with the POT1 mutation, telomeric instability and chromosomal abnormalities were identified [56–58].
Conclusion
Over the past 5 years, our knowledge of genetic causes of melanoma and associated tumors has significantly increased given the use of new technologies such as whole exome sequencing [18 ]. Previously, families prone to melanoma and other tumors could only be tested for known mutations, such as CDKN2A or CDK4. If they lacked these mutations, scientists had few tools to definitively identify whether other germline or somatic mutations may be involved.
With the use of whole exome sequencing, it is likely that new genes will be continued to be identified in families with a strong history of melanoma and other tumors. Of the genes that have recently been identified, such as BAP1, TERT and POT1, we can expect continued research into their role in tumorigenesis of both melanoma and other cancers (Table 1). These genes have also identified telomeres as an area of interest for tumorigenesis. Because these genes were only recently identified, it is difficult to determine whether other tumors occurring in the family are a direct result of the gene mutation, or whether they occurred incidentally. Therefore, caution needs to be exercised before drawing definitive conclusions of tumor association with these genes. Identification of these genes and pathways as a causative factor in melanoma allows for improved health screening practices and the theoretically possible new drug targets in the future.
Table 1. . Associated tumors of various genes linked to melanoma.
CDK2N | CDK4 | BRCA2 | BAP1 | TERT | POT1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrocytoma | X | |||||
Bladder | X | |||||
Breast | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Cervical | X | |||||
Colon | X | |||||
Esophageal | X | |||||
Gallbladder/bile duct tumors | X | |||||
Gliomas | X | |||||
Head and neck | X | |||||
Hematological | X | X | X | |||
Hepatocellular | X | |||||
Keratinocyte carcinomas | X | X | X | |||
Lung | X | X | X | X | X | |
Meningioma | X | |||||
Mesothelioma | X | |||||
Nasopharyngeal | X | |||||
Neuroendocrine carcinomas | X | |||||
Ovarian | X | X | X | |||
Pancreatic | X | X | X | X | ||
Prostate | X | X | X | X | ||
Renal (clear cell) | X | |||||
Sarcoma | X | |||||
Stomach | X | |||||
Uterine | X |
Footnotes
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
- 1.Shaikh WR, Weinstock MA, Halpern AC, Oliveria SA, Geller AC, Dusza SW. The characterization and potential impact of melanoma cases with unknown thickness in the United States’ Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1989–2008. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(1):64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Forsea AM, Del Marmol V, de Vries E, Bailey EE, Geller AC. Melanoma incidence and mortality in Europe: new estimates, persistent disparities. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012;167(5):1124–1130. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Giblin AV, Thomas JM. Incidence, mortality and survival in cutaneous melanoma. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2007;60(1):32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Garshell J, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD, USA: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/ [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meyle KD, Guldberg P. Genetic risk factors for melanoma. Hum. Genet. 2009;126(4):499–510. doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0715-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marzuka-Alcala A, Gabree MJ, Tsao H. Melanoma susceptibility genes and risk assessment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1102:381–393. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-727-3_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• This is a good review article about the molecular pathways and pathogenesis of genes implicated in melanoma and associated tumors.
- 7.Newton Bishop JA, Bishop DT. The genetics of susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma. Drugs Today (Barcelona). 2005;41(3):193–203. doi: 10.1358/dot.2005.41.3.892524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fargnoli MC, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Peris K. High- and low-penetrance cutaneous melanoma susceptibility genes. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2006;6(5):657–670. doi: 10.1586/14737140.6.5.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mehnert JM, Kluger HM. Driver mutations in melanoma: lessons learned from bench-to-bedside studies. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2012;14(5):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s11912-012-0249-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.UV light accelerates melanoma metastasis. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(6):625–626. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2014-051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ragnarsson-Olding BK. Primary malignant melanoma of the vulva – an aggressive tumor for modeling the genesis of non-UV light-associated melanomas. Acta Oncol. 2004;43(5):421–435. doi: 10.1080/02841860410031372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ward KA, Lazovich D, Hordinsky MK. Germline melanoma susceptibility and prognostic genes: a review of the literature. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012;67(5):1055–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goldstein AM, Chan M, Harland M, et al. Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma-prone families from three continents. J. Med. Genet. 2007;44(2):99–106. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Provides an overview of the epidemiology of CDKN2A, and reviews tumors associated with this gene mutation.
- 14.Helsing P, Nymoen DA, Ariansen S, et al. Population-based prevalence of CDKN2A and CDK4 mutations in patients with multiple primary melanomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47(2):175–184. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hashemi J, Platz A, Ueno T, Stierner U, Ringborg U, Hansson J. CDKN2A germ-line mutations in individuals with multiple cutaneous melanomas. Cancer Res. 2000;60(24):6864–6867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bishop JN, Harland M, Randerson-Moor J, Bishop DT. Management of familial melanoma. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(1):46–54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)71010-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Puig-Butille JA, Escamez MJ, Garcia-Garcia F, et al. Capturing the biological impact of CDKN2A and MC1R genes as an early predisposing event in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. Oncotarget. 2014;5(6):1439–1451. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hill VK, Gartner JJ, Samuels Y, Goldstein AM. The genetics of melanoma: recent advances. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2013;14:257–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Demenais F, Mohamdi H, Chaudru V, et al. Association of MC1R variants and host phenotypes with melanoma risk in CDKN2A mutation carriers: a GenoMEL study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(20):1568–1583. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, et al. Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;94(12):894–903. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.12.894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petersen GM, Vachon CM. Genetic epidemiology of melanoma: of consortia and conundrums. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(12):872–873. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.12.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moloney FJ, Guitera P, Coates E, et al. Detection of primary melanoma in individuals at extreme high risk: a prospective 5-year follow-up study. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(8):819–827. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bishop JA, Wachsmuth RC, Harland M, et al. Genotype/phenotype and penetrance studies in melanoma families with germline CDKN2A mutations. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2000;114(1):28–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Maubec E, Chaudru V, Mohamdi H, et al. Familial melanoma: clinical factors associated with germline CDKN2A mutations according to the number of patients affected by melanoma in a family. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012;67(6):1257–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lynch HT, Brand RE, Hogg D, et al. Phenotypic variation in eight extended CDKN2A germline mutation familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma-prone families: the familial atypical mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma syndrome. Cancer. 2002;94(1):84–96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Helgadottir H, Hoiom V, Jonsson G, et al. High risk of tobacco-related cancers in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families. J. Med. Genet. 2014;51(8):545–552. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Potrony M, Puig-Butille JA, Aguilera P, et al. Increased prevalence of lung, breast, and pancreatic cancers in addition to melanoma risk in families bearing the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A mutation: implications for genetic counseling. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014;71(5):888–895. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sheppard KE, McArthur GA. The cell-cycle regulator CDK4: an emerging therapeutic target in melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19(19):5320–5328. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Puntervoll HE, Yang XR, Vetti HH, et al. Melanoma prone families with CDK4 germline mutation: phenotypic profile and associations with MC1R variants. J. Med. Genet. 2013;50(4):264–270. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Reviews phenotypic findings and associations based on the 17 families known to have a CDK4 mutation.
- 30.Zuo L, Weger J, Yang Q, et al. Germline mutations in the p16INK4a binding domain of CDK4 in familial melanoma. Nat. Genet. 1996;12(1):97–99. doi: 10.1038/ng0196-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pjanova D, Engele L, Randerson-Moor JA, et al. CDKN2A and CDK4 variants in Latvian melanoma patients: analysis of a clinic-based population. Melanoma Res. 2007;17(3):185–191. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328014a2cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moran A, O'Hara C, Khan S, et al. Risk of cancer other than breast or ovarian in individuals with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Fam. Cancer. 2012;11(2):235–242. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9506-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mai PL, Chatterjee N, Hartge P, et al. Potential excess mortality in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers beyond breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers, and melanoma. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Scott RJ, Vajdic CM, Armstrong BK, et al. BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of patients with ocular melanoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2002;102(2):188–191. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Levy-Lahad E, Friedman E. Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;96(1):11–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Provides a concise review of tumors associated with both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
- 36.Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(15):1310–1316. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ismail IH, Davidson R, Gagne JP, Xu ZZ, Poirier GG, Hendzel MJ. Germline mutations in BAP1 impair its function in DNA double-strand break repair. Cancer Res. 2014;74(16):4282–4294. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wiesner T, Obenauf AC, Murali R, et al. Germline mutations in BAP1 predispose to melanocytic tumors. Nat. Genet. 2011;43(10):1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/ng.910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abdel-Rahman MH, Pilarski R, Cebulla CM, et al. Germline BAP1 mutation predisposes to uveal melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, meningioma, and other cancers. J. Med. Genet. 2011;48(12):856–859. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Njauw CN, Kim I, Piris A, et al. Germline BAP1 inactivation is preferentially associated with metastatic ocular melanoma and cutaneous-ocular melanoma families. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Harbour JW, Onken MD, Roberson ED, et al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science. 2010;330(6009):1410–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.1194472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Documents the association of BAP1 mutations with uveal melanoma. Provides a detailed discussion on how BAP1 was elucidating from families with uveal melanoma.
- 42.Murali R, Wiesner T, Scolyer RA. Tumours associated with BAP1 mutations. Pathology. 2013;45(2):116–126. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32835d0efb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carbone M, Ferris LK, Baumann F, et al. BAP1 cancer syndrome: malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, and MBAITs. J. Transl. Med. 2012;10:179. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aoude LG, Wadt K, Bojesen A, et al. A BAP1 mutation in a Danish family predisposes to uveal melanoma and other cancers. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e72144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.de la Fouchardiere A, Cabaret O, Savin L, et al. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose also to multiple basal cell carcinomas. Clin. Genet. 2014 doi: 10.1111/cge.12472. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Testa JR, Cheung M, Pei J, et al. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nat. Genet. 2011;43(10):1022–1025. doi: 10.1038/ng.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wiesner T, Fried I, Ulz P, et al. Toward an improved definition of the tumor spectrum associated with BAP1 germline mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30(32):e337–e340. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339(6122):959–961. doi: 10.1126/science.1230062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Discusses the TERT mutation and its association with melanoma and other tumors.
- 49.Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, Kryukov GV, Chin L, Garraway LA. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. 2013;339(6122):957–959. doi: 10.1126/science.1229259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Discusses the TERT mutation and its association with melanoma and other tumors.
- 50.Griewank KG, Murali R, Schilling B, et al. TERT promoter mutations are frequent in cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e80354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Baird DM. Variation at the TERT locus and predisposition for cancer. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2010;12:e16. doi: 10.1017/S146239941000147X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bojesen SE, Pooley KA, Johnatty SE, et al. Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 2013;45(4):371–384. 384e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Populo H, Boaventura P, Vinagre J, et al. TERT promoter mutations in skin cancer: the effects of sun exposure and X-irradiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014;134(8):2251–2257. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shi J, Yang XR, Ballew B, et al. Rare missense variants in POT1 predispose to familial cutaneous malignant melanoma. Nat. Genet. 2014;46(5):482–486. doi: 10.1038/ng.2941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Discusses the TERT mutation and its association with melanoma and other tumors.
- 55.Robles-Espinoza CD, Harland M, Ramsay AJ, et al. POT1 loss-of-function variants predispose to familial melanoma. Nat. Genet. 2014;46(5):478–481. doi: 10.1038/ng.2947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Discusses the TERT mutation and its association with melanoma and other tumors.
- 56.Ramsay AJ, Quesada V, Foronda M, et al. POT1 mutations cause telomere dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2013;45(5):526–530. doi: 10.1038/ng.2584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chang S. Cancer chromosomes going to POT1 . Nat. Genet. 2013;45(5):473–475. doi: 10.1038/ng.2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Veronese L, Tournilhac O, Callanan M, et al. Telomeres and chromosomal instability in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27(2):490–493. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]