Skip to main content
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2017 Dec 6;95(4):584–593. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0204-8

Exploring Lifetime Accumulation of Criminal Justice Involvement and Associated Health and Social Outcomes in a Community-Based Sample of Women who Use Drugs

Jennifer Lorvick 1,, Megan Comfort 1, Alex H Kral 1, Barrot H Lambdin 1
PMCID: PMC6095749  PMID: 29214435

Abstract

Among people who use illegal drugs, engagement with the criminal justice (CJ) system often involves an ongoing, intermittent series of arrests, incarcerations, and periods of community supervision. The potential associations between the lifetime accumulation of CJ involvement and social and health outcomes is largely unexplored. In a cross-sectional sample of women who use crack, heroin, and/ or methamphetamine recruited from communities in Oakland, CA (N = 624), we developed an approach to characterize CJ accumulation. We used latent class analysis (LCA), a multivariate person-centered method that assumes an unobserved categorical variable that divides a population into a small number of mutually exclusive and exhaustive classes. Using observed measures of incarceration and community supervision as indicator variables, we developed a model of CJ accumulation that elucidates patterns of involvement as lived by the women in the sample. Based on model fit statistics, we selected a three-class model and labeled the classes “low,” “medium,” and “high.” We then explored associations between the classes of CJ accumulation and health and health-related outcomes using logistic regression. The odds of homelessness (p for trend = 0.004), transience (p for trend = 0.017), and recent victimization (p for trend = 0.023) were higher among women in higher accumulation classes. Higher class of CJ accumulation was associated with higher odds of reporting unmet need for physical health care (p for trend < 0.001) and mental health care (p for trend = 0.002). The odds of physical health conditions, such as hepatitis C infection (p for trend < 0.001) and mental health conditions, such as depression (p for trend = 0.003), also increased with higher class of accumulation. While the findings described here are limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study, they suggest that CJ accumulation is a potentially meaningful concept for assessing associations between the CJ system and health-related issues.

Keywords: Incarceration, Community supervision, Drug use, Latent class analysis, Women

Introduction

Although the correctional population has declined by 1% per year since 2007, the era of mass incarceration in USA is far from over [1]. In 2014, there were 2.2 million people in the nation’s prisons and jails, compared to 500,000 in 1980 [1, 2]. Furthermore, people in prison or jail are vastly outnumbered by people on probation and parole (referred to here as “community supervision”). In 2014, 4.7 million people were on community supervision, compared to 1.3 million in 2000 [1]. These increases in correctional control have been attributed to an overall rise in “prosecutorial toughness” [3] with regard to bringing charges against people for behavior that is criminalized. As many scholars have pointed out [4, 5], policy decisions to address drug use among poor people by prosecuting them in the criminal justice (CJ) system instead of providing treatment in the public health system—often referred to as the “War on Drugs”—have contributed to the arrest, confinement, and supervision of scores of individuals for relatively low-level drug use or drug-related crimes. For example, in 2010, there were 80% more arrests for drug possession or use than in 1990 [6]. Concurrently, there is a dearth of substance abuse treatment services; in 2014, the need for opioid substitution therapy outstripped program capacity by more than 1 million treatment slots nationally [7]. As a result, the CJ system continues to play a large role in the lives of people who use drugs, lack access to treatment, and reside in heavily policed communities.

Women now make up 18% of the total correctional population in the USA, compared to 4% in 1980 [8]. The total female correctional population in 2014 was 1.25 million, with the vast majority (85%) of those women being on community supervision [1, 9]. Incarcerated women have high levels of infectious disease such as HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections; [1013] chronic health conditions such as hypertension and diabetes; [14] and mental illness [15]. Similar morbidities are found in the limited literature regarding the health of women on community supervision [16, 17].

Engagement with the CJ system is often not a discrete event, but rather an ongoing series of arrests, incarcerations, and periods of community supervision [18]. Recidivism is the norm. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 59% of women released from state prison were arrested again within 3 years [19]. Probation sentences often lead to multiple periods of short-term incarceration for violation of the conditions of probation, rather than for new crimes [20]. Movement in and out of the CJ system, sometimes referred to as “churning,” is profoundly disruptive to the process of reintegration at the individual and community levels [21].

The theories of weathering [22, 23] and social adversity [24] posit that the repetition of exposure to an adverse condition or event is important to consider when investigating possible relationships with health. In Geronimus’ pioneering body of work [25, 26], repeated and sustained exposure to stressful life conditions is shown to be consequential, with associations between negative health outcomes and the “accumulation” of adversity among women. With its focus on accrued hardship rather than linear relationships, accumulation is a particularly salient framework for research on groups who experience an interplay of compounding factors related to poverty, racism, and sexism, and for whom disentangling causality is problematic [27].

Incarceration has been demonstrated to be an exposure event associated with enduring physical and mental health problems [2831]. Given the broad spectrum of possible interactions an individual may have with the criminal justice system—from a one-time encounter with police to a brief jail stay to prolonged periods of incarceration and community supervision—it seems likely that the accumulation of CJ involvement may also be associated with health. Indeed, the few studies that have taken this approach to incarceration support further research in this vein. For example, it has been shown that frequent, short-term incarceration is associated with increases in HIV viral load among people who use drugs [32]. It has also been shown that frequent transitions between incarceration and homelessness are associated with poorer medication adherence and lower levels of viral suppression [33]. HIV-related and all-cause mortality have also been linked to the pattern of repeated short-term incarceration and homelesness [34]. In a study of post-prison mortality, each year spent in prison was found to produce a 2-year decline in life expectancy [35]. Furthermore, transitions between correctional and community settings in general have been marred by a lack of planning for continuity of health care [36], which suggests these transitions could have a disruptive effect on health [37].

We sought to investigate whether the accumulation of CJ involvement over the lifetime is associated with health and social outcomes in a vulnerable group of women. The accumulation of CJ involvement can be described as having breadth, referring to the range of different types of CJ system exposure (prison, jail, probation, parole) and depth, referring to the number of times and total amount of time people are involved in these components of the system. In this paper, we characterize CJ accumulation using latent class analysis (LCA), a multivariate person-centered method that assumes an unobserved categorical variable (in this case CJ accumulation), that divides a population into a small number of mutually exclusive classes. Using observed measures of breadth and depth, we develop a model of CJ accumulation that elucidates patterns of involvement as lived by the women in the sample. We then explore associations between the classes of CJ accumulation and social, physical, and mental health outcomes. We conclude by reflecting on the potential usefulness of the concept of CJ accumulation in light of these exploratory results and identifying directions for further research suggested by our analyses.

Methods

Study Sample

This cross-sectional study had a total of 624 eligible participants. Data collection was conducted from to September 2014 to August 2015 in Oakland, California. Oakland is a racially diverse, mid-sized city (population 420,000) with documented health inequities by race and income [38]. Unlike neighboring San Francisco, there is no system of coordination between the public health and correctional health systems. Using targeted sampling techniques [39, 40], we conducted recruitment in street settings in two neighborhoods with high levels of poverty, police activity, drug trade, and urban blight. Community data collection sites were centrally located in each neighborhood. Recruitment was conducted by an outreach worker who was very familiar with the community drug use scene, having recruited over 2000 injection drug and crack cocaine users in the same neighborhoods during 2011–2013 [41]. The outreach worker approached potentially eligible women on the streets, in parking lots, homeless encampments, and similar venues, briefly explained the study procedures, and referred potential participants to the community field site, where they were screened for eligibility. Because the recruitment process was separate from the screening process, and no identifying information was requested from referred participants, refusal rates could not be documented. Eligibility criteria were (1) biological female, (2) age 18 or older, and (3) used heroin, methamphetamine, crack cocaine, or powder cocaine in the 30 days prior to interview. Eligible women gave informed consent and participated in a 30–45-min quantitative survey interview. The survey was administered by trained interviewers, who read items aloud and recorded responses in laptop-based survey instrument using Blaise (Westat®). Referrals to health and social services were provided as needed after completion of the survey. Data were uploaded daily to a secure server and deleted from laptops immediately afterwards. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at RTI International.

Measures

Latent Class Indicators

To capture the accumulation of CJ involvement among study participants, we developed four indicator variables to represent CJ system experience. All variables were based on self-report. First, we focused on two types of exposure to the CJ system—(1) incarceration, including jail and/or prison, since the age of 18 and (2) community supervision, including probation and/or parole, since the age of 18. Next, we built in two additional dimensions—the number of times a participant was incarcerated or sentenced to community supervision and the amount of time a participant was incarcerated or on community supervision. The amount of time was collected in weeks, months, and years and converted to days for analysis. We made each of these an ordered categorical variable, split at the quartiles of the distribution. Thus, our four measures of CJ involvement included as latent class indicators were the number of times incarcerated (0–1, 2–3, 4–9, and ≥ 10), the number of days incarcerated (0–7, 8–122, 123–730, and ≥ 730), the number of times in community supervision (0, 1, 2–3, and ≥ 4), and the number of days in community supervision (0, 1–1096, 1097–2191, and ≥ 2192). As CJ involvement has greater potential for accumulation among people who are older, we included age (in years) as a covariate in the latent class model.

Outcome Indicators

Our outcome indicators included dichotomous measures in four different categories—individual and social factors influencing health (“health-related factors”), health risk behavior, unmet health care need, and health status. All items were self-reported. Drawn from the literature addressing influences on health among women who use drugs [42], health-related factors included current homelessness; residential transience, defined as moving two or more times in the past 6 months; physical assault in the past year, using the question, “in the past year, has anybody punched, slapped kicked or beat you?”; and sexual assault in the past year, using the question “in the past year, has someone used force or threats to make you have sex with them?”; For risk behavior, we included injection drug use past six months and high risk sex, defined as unprotected vaginal or anal sex with two or more male partners in the past 6 months.

Unmet physical health care need was defined as a “yes” response to the question, “In the past year, were there times when you thought you should see a health care provider for a physical health problem but didn’t go?” The same wording was used for the item regarding unmet mental health care need.

Physical and mental health measures focused on conditions common among women in the criminal justice system based on existing literature [14, 43, 44]. For physical health, we included the following self-reported health conditions: current hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; current hypertension; vision problems in the past year; hearing problems in the past year; dental problems, defined as having problems with teeth or gums in the last year; respiratory problems, defined as having problems with breathing in the last year; and chronic pain, defined as pain that lasted more than 3 months in the past year. Participants who responded affirmatively to the question, “Have you ever been told by a health care provider or other professional (e.g., social worker, counselor) that you have a mental health issue?” were defined as having a mental health condition. Women were then asked what condition(s) they had been diagnosed with. Specific conditions reported were depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Statistical Analysis

We identified patterns of accumulated CJ involvement using LCA, a multivariate person-centered method that assumes an unobserved categorical variable that divides a population into a small number of mutually exclusive and exhaustive latent classes [45, 46]. Classes capture patterns, and are not created with any sort of ordering in mind. Characteristics of, and membership in, each class is modeled with a set of measured indicators. Results of the analysis include the number of latent classes, class prevalence, and the class-specific probability of each indicator. We fit models with 1–5 classes and selected the best-fitting model based on measures of absolute fit (G 2 likelihood ratio statistic); relative fit, including the Akaike information criteria (AIC), Bayesian information criteria (BIC), consistent AIC (CAIC), and adjusted BIC (aBIC); entropy (a summary measure of measurement error in class assignment); parsimony; class size; and the scientific interpretation of the classes [46]. Each model was run with 1000 random starting values to ensure model identification. As CJ involvement has greater potential for accumulation among people who are older, we included age (in years) as a covariate in all models.

Women were assigned to classes based on the highest posterior probability of class membership. Relationships between latent class membership and measures of health factors, risk behavior, unmet health care need, and health status were assessed using logistic regression. A separate regression model was run for each outcome. Because the study is exploratory and many of the outcomes we chose are interrelated, we opted not to control for confounders in multivariable analyses aside from age. Latent class membership was included in the model as a group-linear term to test for a dose-response relationship (i.e., trend) between class membership and study outcomes. All analyses were conducted in Stata 14.1, and latent class analyses used the Stata LCA Plugin [47].

Results

The sample was predominantly African American, with a mean age of 48 (IQR 38, 54). Crack cocaine was the most common drug used, followed by heroin (Table 1). In addition, 64% of women smoked marijuana and 90% smoked cigarettes in the past 6 months, and 29% drank alcohol daily in the past 30 days. Over half the participants were homeless. The vast majority of women had health insurance, primarily Medicaid. Adult lifetime CJ involvement in this community-recruited sample was high:83% had been in jail, 19% had been in prison, 70% had been on probation, and 16% had been on parole. In all, 85% of women had some form of CJ involvement as adults.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants (N = 624).

Number (%)
Race/ethnicity
 African American 537 (86)
 White 32 (5)
 Latina 30 (5)
 Other 25 (4)
Mean age 48 (IQR 38, 54)
Drug use past 30 days
 Crack cocaine 495 (79)
 Heroin 199 (32)
 Powder cocaine 237 (38)
 Methamphetamine 147 (24)
 Daily alcohol use 181 (29)
Criminal justice involvement
 Incarceration
  # of times, median (IQR) 3 (1–9)
  # of days, median (IQR) 122 (7–730)
 Community supervision
  # of times, median (IQR) 1 (0–3)
  # of days, median (IQR) 1096 (0–2191)
Health-related factors
 Has health insurance 500 (81)
 Homeless 373 (60)
 Moved > 1 time past 6 months 229 (43)
 Income below poverty level 511 (82)
 Physical assault past 6 months 193 (31)
 Sexual assault past 6 months 68 (11)
Risk behavior
 High risk sex past 6 months 168 (27)
 Injected drugs past 6 months 115 (18)
Unmet health care needs
 Physical health care 401 (64)
 Mental health care 309 (50)
Health conditions
 HCV 117 (19)
 Hypertension 246 (40)
 Vision problems 391 (63)
 Hearing problems 134 (21)
 Dental problems 367 (59)
 Breathing problems 256 (41)
 Chronic pain 193 (31)
 PTSD 66 (11)
 Depression 138 (22)
 Anxiety 67 (11)
 Bipolar 109 (17)
 Any mental health diagnosis 290 (46)

Results of Latent Class Analysis

Latent class membership was estimated using four categorical variables of criminal justice involvement, organized into four-level ordinal variables. Model fit statistics for models with one through five classes (Table 2) suggest that the three or five latent class model was optimal. The three-class model was selected based on: (1) clear, interpretable classes; (2) minimum BIC and CAIC; (3) relatively small AIC and aBIC; and (4) higher levels of entropy. Research has suggested that BIC is a preferred statistic to AIC with sample sizes similar to our own [48]. In addition, the best-fitting three-class model had a G2 statistic of 309.674 and was reached in 97.5% of model runs, compared to a G2 statistic of 162.358 reached at 65.2% of model runs for the 5-class model. Given our interest in looking at associations between latent class membership and study outcomes, we preferred a higher entropy value as research suggests entropy values closer to one suggest clearer delineation of classes [49]. The five-class model also yielded one class size with only 6% (n = 36) of the study population, thereby limiting its utility in regression analyses.

Table 2.

Statistics for latent class models: comparing models with one to five latent classes.

Model G2-statistic AIC BIC cAIC aBIC Entropy % Solution
1-class 1917.801 1941.801 1995.034 2007.034 1956.936 1.000 100%
2-class 691.802 741.802 852.705 877.705 773.334 0.992 100%
3-class 309.674 385.674 554.248 592.248 433.604 0.889 97.80%
4-class 227.540 345.472 571.716 606.783 409.798 0.819 27.50%
5-class 162.358 343.793 627.707 638.271 424.516 0.798 65.20%

BIC Bayesian Information Criterion, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, cAIC consistent AIC, aBIC adjusted BIC, % Solution the percentage of seeds associated with the best fit model

Distribution of Criminal Justice Involvement across Latent Classes

The prevalence of the three classes and the probabilities of reporting each type of CJ system involvement given latent class membership are depicted in Fig. 1. We labeled these classes “low,” “medium,” and “high” CJ accumulation for simplicity’s sake, while noting that each also reflects a particular combination of CJ involvement across the four indicator variables (number of times incarcerated, amount of time incarceration, number of times on community supervision, amount of time on community supervision). The smallest class (30% of the sample) was characterized by low levels of CJ accumulation, with 76% reporting being incarcerated 0–1 times and 75% reporting being incarcerated from 0 to 7 days, and less than 2% having experienced community supervision. This class was defined as CJ-Low. The other two classes each represented 35% of the sample. The CJ-Medium class was characterized by a mix of incarceration and community supervision experiences, with 47% reporting being incarcerated 2–3 times, 44% reporting being incarcerated for 8–122 days, 66% reporting being on community supervision 1 time, and 56% reporting being on community supervision for 1–1096 days. The CJI-High class also had a mix of incarceration and community supervision experiences, but at a very high level, 57% reporting being incarcerated ≥ 10 times, 59% reporting being incarcerated for ≥ 731 days, 52% reporting being on community supervision 2–3 times, and 53% reporting being on community supervision for ≥ 2192 days.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Probabilities of reporting each type of CJ system involvement given latent class membership

Associations between Latent Classes and Study Outcomes

The odds of homelessness, transience, physical assault, and drug injection were higher among women with greater CJ accumulation (see Table 3). Compared to women in the low CJ accumulation class, women in the medium and high classes tended to have higher odds of unmet need for physical health care and mental health care. A large proportion of women overall had health insurance, with no statistical difference by class. With regard to health conditions, the odds of HCV, vision problems, and dental problems were higher among women with greater CJ accumulation. There were no differences in hypertension or chronic pain, however. With regard to mental health, the odds of self-reported mental health conditions, including depression and bipolar disorder were higher among women with greater CJ accumulation. Anxiety and PTSD disorders did not significantly differ by class of CJ accumulation.

Table 3.

Associations between criminal justice latent class membership and health-related factors, unmet health needs, and physical and mental health conditions

Criminal justice accumulation p valuea
Low Medium High
AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
Health-related factors
 Has health insurance (ref) 1.004 (0.602, 1.675) 0.841 (0.510, 1.386) 0.478
 Homeless (ref) 1.460 (0.982, 2.169) 1.799 (1.203, 2.688) 0.004
 Moved > 1 time past 6 months (ref) 1.417 (0.919, 2.185) 1.706 (1.104, 2.638) 0.017
 Income below poverty level (ref) 0.788 (0.454, 1.315) 0.579 (0.340, 0.986) 0.044
 Physical assault past 6 months (ref) 1.186 (0.764, 1.840) 1.630 (1.061, 2.506) 0.023
 Sexual assault past 6 months (ref) 1.483 (0.743, 2.960) 1.914 (0.981, 3.732) 0.056
Risk behavior
 High risk sex past 6 months (ref) 1.379 (0.875, 2.173) 1.457 (0.925, 2.296) 0.115
 Injected drugs past 6 months (ref) 1.579 (0.888, 2.807) 2.748 (1.593, 4.741) < 0.001
 Unmet need-physical health care (ref) 1.550 (1.040, 2.311) 2.411 (1.590, 3.658) < 0.001
 Unmet need-mental health care (ref) 1.957 (1.312, 2.918) 1.921 (1.288, 2.864) 0.002
Health conditions
 HCV (ref) 1.811 (0.990, 3.314) 3.729 (2.112, 6.583) < 0.001
 Hypertension (ref) 0.888 (0.595, 1.326) 0.967 (0.649, 1.442) 0.891
 Vision problems (ref) 1.872 (1.253, 2.795) 2.196 (1.462, 3.300) < 0.001
 Hearing problems (ref) 2.296 (1.389, 3.797) 1.513 (0.897, 2.554) 0.194
 Dental problems (ref) 1.365 (0.920, 2.025) 1.643 (1.102, 2.449) 0.015
 Respiratory problems (ref) 0.948 (0.634, 1.415) 1.266 (0.851, 1.883) 0.222
 Chronic pain (ref) 1.397 (0.910, 2.142) 1.216 (0.789, 1.874) 0.420
 PTSD (ref) 1.286 (0.661, 2.501) 1.415 (0.734, 2.276) 0.308
 Depression (ref) 2.120 (1.260, 3.568) 2.291 (1.365, 3.845) 0.003
 Anxiety (ref) 0.957 (0.508, 1.805) 1.009 (0.538, 1.892) 0.970
 Bipolar (ref) 1.203 (0.691, 2.097) 1.833 (1.081, 3.108) 0.019
 Any mental health diagnosis (ref) 1.455 (0.975, 2.173) 2.237 (1.497, 3.344) < 0.001

aTest for trend from group-linear term

Discussion

In this sample of 624 women who use drugs in Oakland, CA, we observed relationships between higher levels of CJ accumulation and unmet mental and physical health care needs, as well as health-related factors, such as homelessness. The prevalence of certain health conditions—most notably mental health problems—also trended upward with higher class of CJ accumulation. Because the data are cross-sectional, these associations could operate either way: for example, CJ accumulation could increase the risk for homelessness, or homelessness could increase the risk for CJ accumulation. Also, there could be intervening factors that moderate these relationships, which we did not examine here. Still, this work extends previous findings about associations between CJ involvement and health, which has relied predominantly on binary (yes/no) measures of CJ involvement, and typically omit community supervision experiences. It hones in on a salient aspect of CJ system experience, particularly for women who use drugs—accumulation. Our findings suggest that accumulation is a meaningful concept in terms of investigating and understanding health consequences of CJ involvement for women.

It is worthwhile to consider the underlying reasons that CJ accumulation and women’s health might be associated. First, repeated movement in and out of various dimensions of the criminal justice system may foster instability. German found that, among low-income women, instability was associated with infectious disease risk [50], risk of chronic illness, and mental illness history [27]. In our sample, key components of German’s conceptualization of instability were common, including homelessness, residential transience, and low income. Instability and CJ accumulation likely act in tandem, each increasing the chances of the other. Second, ongoing CJ system involvement results in deprivation, through loss of employment opportunities; restrictions in public benefits; and difficulty obtaining housing [51, 52]. The challenges of unemployment, poverty, and marginal housing are clearly associated with poor health among low-income women [53, 54]. Finally, it is important to consider the potential role of trauma. As Fuentes (2014) writes, “traumatic experiences are a primary unifying characteristic of incarcerated women.” [55] Repeated exposure to the CJ system may reactivate and compound trauma, contributing to poor mental health outcomes. Anderson [30] found strong associations between a history of incarceration and trauma exposure in a nationally representative sample of Black Americans that was 55% female. These are theories of how CJ accumulation may produce or amplify instability, deprivation, and trauma, with consequent negative health impacts. Similarly, instability, deprivation, and trauma may result in greater CJ accumulation, also with potential negative health consequences.

Comparing our results to other works assessing history of CJ involvement and health outcomes, it is interesting that we did not find an association between hypertension and class of CJ involvement. This stands in contrast to findings by Wang [29], in which early adult hypertension was associated with incarceration, and the groups with the most extensive history of incarceration most profoundly affected. By contrast, Howell [31] found that hypertension was associated with recent incarceration but not a history of incarceration. Both of these studies used a stronger, biometric measure of hypertension, had predominantly male samples, and did not stratify analyses by sex. Thus, it is difficult to evaluate whether our findings is comparable. In a New York City jail population, Akiyama [56] found an association between HCV infection and recidivism, which is consistent with our findings regarding higher class of CJ accumulation and self-reported HCV infection. Interestingly, the association held in separate analyses of both IDU and non-IDU in the New York sample. Consistent with our findings regarding increased social vulnerability and CJ accumulation, a North Carolina study of women in prison [57] found that women who had been incarcerated more than once experienced more housing instability, were more likely to inject drugs, and reported a higher prevalence of physical and sexual assault. In making these comparisons, it is worth reiterating that our findings are exploratory in nature, and provide additional food for thought rather than conclusive evidence regarding potential health and social effects of repeated CJ system involvement among women.

The ubiquity of CJ involvement in this sample is worth noting. Women participating in the study were recruited from poor, predominantly African American neighborhoods and screened for recent drug use, but not CJ involvement. Fully 85% had been involved in some aspect of the system, reflecting the influence of a criminalized approach to addressing drug use. Our findings on the associations between CJ accumulation and social and health problems among women add to the literature on the links between punitive drug policy and health inequities. It is also interesting that, despite a notably high prevalence of having health insurance (81%), many women reported unmet physical and health care needs. Early research on the Medicaid expansion has noted the gap between having insurance and using it, particularly for routine and preventive care [58]. In this vein, the authors are currently conducting research to understand challenges to Medicaid use for routine care among women on probation, and to improve health insurance literacy in this population (NIMHD grant #R01MD010439).

This cross-sectional study is exploratory and presents several important limitations. First, all data are based on self-report. Participant recall regarding CJ involvement could be inaccurate, particularly among those who experienced frequent, brief jail stays or who have had probation sentences extended repeatedly. In addition, there could be inaccuracies in self-reported health conditions. Official criminal justice and medical records would provide a more verifiable source of data. In addition, our data are cross-sectional. Although we detected trends towards certain outcomes with greater class of CJ accumulation, we cannot establish causality. By testing the concept of CJ accumulation in longitudinal datasets, more definitive relationships could be determined. These datasets would also be better suited to determining mediating factors in the relationships we discuss here—for example, the relationship between victimization and CJ accumulation could be mediated by mental health. Given the exploratory character of our inquiry, and the interrelated nature of many of our outcomes, we did not control for confounding factors beyond age. In addition, because latent class membership is probability-based, classification errors may exist. Finally, findings from this predominantly crack cocaine-using sample in one city may not be generalizable to women who predominantly use other drugs, or to other locales.

There are many promising future directions for research regarding the health effects of CJ system accumulation. Conceptual work could include broadening and testing the idea of “breadth” of accumulation to include juvenile justice system involvement and “indirect” exposure to the system through the incarceration of loved ones, in response to the growing literature on the collateral damages of incarceration [59, 60]. Additional theoretical work could investigate whether the depth of CJ system exposure is simply additive, or whether different combinations of type and length of exposure compound differently in terms of health consequences. For example, a prison sentence of 3 years could result in a period of relatively good health, while multiple short-term jail sentences that total 3 years could be harmful. Future studies should consider the impact of CJ accumulation on the health of men as well as women.

We found associations between higher class of CJ accumulation and a variety of negative health and health-related outcomes, indicating that CJ accumulation is a concept worthy of additional inquiry. Similarly, the use of LCA to identify patterns reflecting the breadth and depth of CJ experience is an area ripe for additional research. Ultimately, our conceptual and analytic innovations seek a path to better reflect the lived reality of people caught up in the CJ system, and to contribute to a richer understanding of the association between this experience and health outcomes.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (grant #R01MD007679).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures were reviewed and approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at RTI International.

References

  • 1.Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A, Minton T. Correctional populations in the United States, 2014. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Sentencing Project. Trends in U.S. Corrections.Washington DC: The Sentencing Project 2015.
  • 3.Pfaft J. Locked in: the true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. New York: Basic Books; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moore LD, Elkavich A. Who’s using and who’s doing time: incarceration, the war on drugs, and public health. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9 Suppl):S176–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Tonry M. Malign neglect: race, crime, and punishment in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Snyder H. Arrest in the United States, 1990–2010. Washington DC: Department of Justice; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jones C, Campopiano M, Baldwin G, McCance-Katz E. National and state treatment need and capacity for opioid agonist medication-assisted treatment. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):e55–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.The Sentencing Project. Factsheet: incarcerated women. The Sentencing Project; December 2012 2012.
  • 9.Kaeble D, Maruschak L, Bonczar T. Probation and parole in the United States, 2014. Department of Justice: Washington DC U.S; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maruschak L. HIV in prisons, 2001–2010. Washington DC: Department of Justice; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zampino R, Coppola N, Sagnelli C, Di Caprio G, Sagnelli E. Hepatitis C virus infection and prisoners: epidemiology, outcome and treatment. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(21):2323–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Fox RK, Currie SL, Evans J, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection among prisoners in the California state correctional system. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2005;41(2):177–86. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Nijhawan AE, Chapin KC, Salloway R, et al. Prevalence and predictors of trichomonas infection in newly incarcerated women. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(12):973–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Binswanger IA, Merrill JO, Krueger PM, White MC, Booth RE, Elmore JG. Gender differences in chronic medical, psychiatric, and substance-dependence disorders among jail inmates. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(3):476–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Fazel S, Baillargeon J. The health of prisoners. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):956–65. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.El-Bassel N, Marotta PL, Shaw SA, et al. Women in community corrections in New York City: HIV infection and risks. Int J STD AIDS. 2016; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Lorvick J, Comfort M, Kreb C, Kral A. Heath service use and social vulnerability in a community-based sample of women on probation and parole, 2011–2013. Health and Justice. 2015;3(13).
  • 18.Lynch M. Theorizing the role of the ‘war on drugs’ in U.S. punishment. Theor Criminol. 2012;16(2):175–99.
  • 19.Durose M, Cooper A, Snyder H. Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington DC: Department of Justice; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phelps M. The paradox of probation: community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law Policy. 2013;351((1–2)):51–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Taxman FS, Byrne JM, Pattavina A. Racial disparity and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system: exploring consequences for deterrence. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2005;16(4 Suppl B):57–77. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Geronimus AT. Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women’s health in the United States: the role of the weathering conceptual framework. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001;56(4):133–6. 149-150 [PubMed]
  • 23.Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, Bound J. “Weathering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):826–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Surtees PG, Wainwright NW. The shackles of misfortune: social adversity assessment and representation in a chronic-disease epidemiological setting. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):95–111. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Geronimus AT, Hicken MT, Pearson JA, Seashols SJ, Brown KL, Cruz TD. Do US Black women experience stress-related accelerated biological aging?: a novel theory and first population-based test of black-white differences in telomere length. Hum Nat. 2010;21(1):19–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Geronimus AT, Pearson JA, Linnenbringer E, et al. Race-ethnicity, poverty, urban stressors, and telomere length in a Detroit community-based sample. J Health Soc Behav. 2015;56(2):199–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.German D, Latkin CA. Social stability and health: exploring multidimensional social disadvantage. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2012;89(1):19–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Massoglia M. Incarceration as exposure: the prison, infectious disease, and other stress-related illnesses. J Health Soc Behav. 2008;49(1):56–71. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Wang EA, Pletcher M, Lin F, et al. Incarceration, incident hypertension, and access to health care: findings from the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(7):687–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Anderson RE, Geier TJ, Cahill SP. Epidemiological associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and incarceration in the National Survey of American Life. Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH. 2016;26(2):110–23. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Howell BA, Long JB, Edelman EJ, et al. Incarceration history and uncontrolled blood pressure in a multi-site cohort. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(12):1496–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Buxton J, et al. Dose-response effect of incarceration events on nonadherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users. J Infect Dis. 2011;203(9):1215–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Lim S, Nash D, Hollod L, Harris TG, Lennon MC, Thorpe LE. Influence of jail incarceration and homelessness patterns on engagement in HIV care and HIV viral suppression among New York City adults living with HIV/AIDS. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Lim S, Harris TG, Nash D, Lennon MC, Thorpe LE. All-cause, drug-related, and HIV-related mortality risk by trajectories of jail incarceration and homelessness among adults in New York City. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(4):261–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Patterson E. The dose–response of time served in prison on mortality: New York state, 1989–2003. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):523–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Freudenberg N, Daniels J, Crum M, Perkins T, Richie BE. Coming home from jail: the social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(10):1725–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Dumont DM, Allen SA, Brockmann BW, Alexander NE, Rich JD. Incarceration, community health, and racial disparities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(1):78–88. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Alameda County Health Department . How place, racism and poverty matter for health in Alameda County. Oakland, CA: Alameda County Public Health Department; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kral AH, Malekinejad M, Vaudrey J, et al. Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2010;87(5):839–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Watters J, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1989;36:416–30.
  • 41.Lambdin B, Kral A, Comfort M, Lopez A, Lorvick J. Associations of criminal justice and substance use treatment involvement with HIV/HCV testing and the HIV treatment cascade among people who use drugs in Oakland. California Addiction Science and Clinical Practice. (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Logan TK, Cole J, Leukefeld C. Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(6):851–85. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Braithwaite RL, Treadwell HM, Arriola KR. Health disparities and incarcerated women: a population ignored. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9 Suppl):S173–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Lynch SM, Dehart DD, Belknap JE, et al. A multisite study of the prevalence of serious mental illness, PTSD, and substance use disorders of women in jail. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.). 2014;65(5):670–674. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Lanza ST, Rhoades BL. Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prev Sci. 2013;14(2):157–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Collins LM, ST L. Latent class and latent transition analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & sons; 2013.
  • 47.LCA Stata Plugin [computer program]. University Park2015.
  • 48.Nylund K, Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(4):535–69.
  • 49.Celeux G, Soromenho G. An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J Classif. 1996;13:195–212.
  • 50.German D, Latkin CA. Social stability and HIV risk behavior: evaluating the role of accumulated vulnerability. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(1):168–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 51.Pager D. The mark of a criminal record. Am J Sociol. 2003;108(5):937–75.
  • 52.Mele C. The civil threat of eviction and the regulation and control of U.S. public housing communities. In: Miller CMT, ed. Civil penalties, social consequences New York: Routledge; 2005:121–138.
  • 53.Nyamathi AM, Leake B, Gelberg L. Sheltered versus nonsheltered homeless women differences in health, behavior, victimization, and utilization of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):565–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Teruya C, Longshore D, Andersen RM, et al. Health and health care disparities among homeless women. Women & health. 2010;50(8):719–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Fuentes C. Nobody’s child: the role of trauma and interpersonal violence in women's pathways to incarceration and resultant service needs. Med Anthropol Q. 2014;38(1):138–51. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 56.Akiyama MJ, Kaba F, Rosner Z, et al. Correlates of hepatitis C virus infection in the targeted testing program of the New York City jail system. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). 2017;132(1):41–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Herbst JH, Branscomb-Burgess O, Gelaude DJ, Seth P, Parker S, Fogel CI. Risk profiles of women experiencing initial and repeat incarcerations: implications for prevention programs. AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education. 2016;28(4):299–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 58.Health Policy Alternatives Inc. Review of the evidence on the use of the emergency department by Medicaid patients and the evolving role of emergency medicine physicians. Emergency Medicine Action Fund;2015.
  • 59.Comfort M. Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2007;3:271–96.
  • 60.Mauer M, Chesney-Lind ME. Invisible punishment: the collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: new press. New York: New Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES