Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2018 Jul 4;16(3):3481–3488. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9077

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 suppresses the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer epithelial cells through the RhoA/Rac1 pathway

Yueyang Liang 1, Shushu Wang 1, Yi Zhang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6096110  PMID: 30127952

Abstract

Dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (Dock1), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, has been proven to facilitate cell survival, motility and proliferation via the activation of Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1). Engulfment and cell motility 1 (Elmo1) serves as a mammalian homolog of Ced-12, which has been evolutionarily conserved from worm to human. The present study aimed to investigate the roles and mechanisms of Dock1 and Elmo1 in the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) epithelial cells. Cell Counting kit-8, cell migration and cell invasion assays were performed to assess cell viability, migration and invasion, respectively. A plate clone formation assay was performed to determine cell proliferation. Western blot analysis and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays were used to evaluate mRNA and protein expression. The results revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 inhibited cell viability, suppressed migration and invasion, and reduced Rac1 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 also attenuated the expression of migration-associated proteins and affected the Ras homolog gene family, member A (RhoA)/Rac1 pathway in MDA-MB-231 cells. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 suppresses the migration and invasion of TNBC epithelial cells through the RhoA/Rac1 pathway.

Keywords: dedicator of cytokinesis 1, engulfment and cell motility 1, triple-negative breast cancer, migration, invasion, Ras homolog gene family, member A, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1, focal adhesion kinase, Talin, Vinculin

Introduction

Breast cancer, one of the most prevalent types of malignant tumor in females, severely impairs the health of females worldwide (1,2). Breast cancer is generally classified into five subtypes, including luminal type A, luminal type B, normal breast type, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression type and basal type (3). For clinical treatment and prognostic evaluation, it is conventional to assess the expression of three breast cancer markers, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2, by immunohistochemistry, hence the concept of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (4). TNBC refers to breast cancer with negative immunohistochemical results for ER, PR and HER2, and acts as a specific breast cancer subtype, which was proposed in recent years (5). Specific characteristics of TNBC include high invasiveness and metastasis, high recurrence and mortality rates, and a low survival rate. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of TNBC remain unclear.

Rho-family GTPases, a primary branch of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, including RhoA and Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1), are identified as crucial regulators of actin cytoskeleton dynamics and endothelial contractions (6). Deregulation of these Rho-GTPases may result in a disorder of the actin cytoskeleton and may further impact the integrity of the endothelial barrier. Previous studies have demonstrated that deregulated Rho-GTPases are associated with the development and progression of various types of tumor, including testicular cancer (7), colorectal tumors (8), gastric carcinoma (9) and breast cancer (10). Nevertheless, the precise role of these signaling mechanisms in the migration and invasion of TNBC cells is not well understood.

Dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (Dock1), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, has been proven to facilitate cell survival, motility and proliferation via the activation of Rac1 (11,12). Engulfment and cell motility 1 (Elmo1) serves as a mammalian homolog of Ced-12, which has been evolutionarily conserved from worm to human. Elmo1 itself has no intrinsic catalytic activity, but can regulate the activity of interacting proteins as a scaffold protein (13). Furthermore, Elmo1 also joins multiple cellular processes, including myoblast fusion, neurite outgrowth, phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and cell migration (14). Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that by interacting with Dock1, Elmo1 acts as an element of a bipartite guanine nucleotide-exchange factor for Rac1 (15–20). Recently, it was revealed that the interaction between Dock1 and Elmo1 could modulate tumor metastasis, which is enhanced by the actin cytoskeleton in breast cancer (21). Therefore, Dock1 and Elmo1 were selected as the objects of the present study, in order to determine their exact roles and mechanisms in the migration and invasion of TNBC epithelial cells.

The present study analyzed the association between Dock1, Elmo1 and the migration and invasion of TNBC epithelial cells. Furthermore, the roles and mechanisms of Dock1 and Elmo1 were investigated, together with those of the RhoA/Rac1 pathway in the migration and invasion of TNBC epithelial cells.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The human TNBC epithelial MDA-MB-231 cell line was obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.

Cell transfection

Dock1 siRNA (targeting sequence: 5′-GGCCTACACTTTGCTTCTGC-3′), Elmo1 siRNA (targeting sequence: 5′-CGACAAUGUAACUCUGCAA-3′) and unspecific scrambled siRNA (50 nM) (targeting sequence: 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′) vectors (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were transfected into MDA-MB-231 cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 48 h. Subsequent experiments were performed 48 h after transfection.

Grouping

In the present study, there were four treatment groups, including the control group (MDA-MB-231 cells), NC group (MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with unspecific scrambled siRNA vector), si-Dock1 group (MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with Dock1 siRNA vector) and si-Elmo1 group (MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with Elmo1 siRNA vector).

Cell viability analysis

The viability of MDA-MB-231 cells was assessed by the Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). MDA-MB-231 cells (~6×104 cells/ml) in the logarithmic phase were plated into the wells of 96-well plates, prior to being incubated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C for 12 h. Cells were then treated with one of the four aforementioned treatments. Subsequently, cells were maintained for 12, 24 or 48 h. Subsequently, 10 µl CCK reagent were added into each well and cells were maintained for 3 h. A microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to read the absorbance at 450 nm. Cell viability was evaluated by the percentage of live cells compared with the control.

Invasion and migration assay

Transwell assays were used to detect the migration and invasion of cells. Matrigel inserts were used in the invasion assay, and not the migration assay. Otherwise, the protocols were identical for both assays. A 24-well Transwell chamber (8 µm; Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used. Cultured MDA-MB-231 cells were suspended in serum-free DMEM (100 µl; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and maintained for 24 h. Cells (2×104 cells/ml) were then placed on the upper Transwell chamber, and the lower chamber was filled with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS as chemoattractant. Following incubation for 24 h, the cells that had invaded into the lower chamber were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at room temperature for 10 min and stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) at room temperature for 30 min. The number of invaded cells was counted visually under a fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×200; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Plate colony formation assay

Cultured MDA-MB-231 cells in the logarithmic phase were digested by 0.25% trypsin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and then suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cell suspension (~6×104 cells/ml) was then inoculated in the culture dishes, which were incubated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C for 2 weeks. Subsequently, the supernatant was discarded and cells were washed twice with PBS. Next, the cells were incubated with 5 ml 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The supernatant was then discarded and Giemsa stain (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was added for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, cells were washed with PBS and air-dried. The number of cell colonies was counted visually using a fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×200).

Western blot analysis

The protein of cells was extracted using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The bicinchoninic acid method was applied to assess the concentration of protein. Protein lysates (35 µg) of cultured MDA-MB-231 cells were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. Subsequently, the separated products were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). TBST containing 5% skim milk was used out to block the membranes at 37°C for 60 min. Western blotting was performed using the following specific antibodies: Rabbit anti-human anti-Dock1 (dilution, 1:1,000; catalog no. ab97325; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-human anti-Elmo1 (dilution, 1:10,000; catalog no. ab174298; Abcam), rabbit anti-human anti-FAK (dilution, 1:1,000; catalog no. ab40794; Abcam), rabbit anti-human anti-Talin (dilution, 1:1,000; catalog no. ab71333; Abcam), rabbit anti-human anti-Vinculin (dilution, 1:10,000; catalog no. ab129002; Abcam), rabbit anti-human anti-RhoA (dilution, 1:5,000; catalog no. ab187027; Abcam), rabbit anti-human anti-Rac1 (dilution, 1:1,000; catalog no. ab155938; Abcam) and rabbit anti-human anti-actin (dilution, 1:5,000; catalog no. ab179467; Abcam). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP; catalog no. sc-2005; dilution, 1:6,000; donkey anti-goat IgG-HRP; cat. no. sc-2020; dilution, 1:7,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) were added, and the membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Enhanced chemiluminescent reagents (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) were added and an enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for evaluating the results. The blots were visualized by Gel documentation analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and densitometry was performed using Quantity One 1-D software (version 4.62; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cultured MDA-MB-231 cells using TRIzol reagent (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using a Reverse Transcription kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The cDNA was amplified using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (MedChenExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). RT-qPCR analysis was performed using an ABI 7500 Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 10 min pre-treatment at 94°C, 97°C for 15 sec, 64°C for 45 sec (45 cycles), 97°C for 15 sec, 64°C for 1 min, 94°C for 15 sec, and a final extension at 75°C for 10 min. The primers were designed by Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.: Dock1 forward, 5′-CCGCCGCAAACTTTTTCCTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGATGTGCACAGTGTCTCCG-3′ (product: 222 bp); Elmo1 forward, 5′-GTAGGGACCCTTCTAGCTGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTCAGGTTCTGCAGTTTGC-3′ (product: 202 bp); FAK forward, 5′-GAGCGTCTAATCCGACAGCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGATTTCTTTCCGCCCAATTCT-3′ (product: 209 bp); Talin forward, 5′-TAGCCTGAAAGGGAACTCGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTTCCGTCCTGGGAACGTC-3′ (product: 206 bp); Vinculin forward, 5′-GCAAAAGCTGTGGCTGGAAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATGTCATTGCCCTTGCTGGA-3′ (product: 356 bp); actin forward, 5′-GATATTGGCAACGACCCCCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCCAGCCAGGATCTTGAAGG-3′ (product: 174 bp). Actin was used as the control of the input RNA level. Data were quantified using the 2−ΔΔCq method (22).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 19.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The results of the present study are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of at least three independent experiments. All experimental data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc test was Fisher's least significant difference test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 inhibits the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells

siRNA vectors targeting Dock1 and Elmo1, si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1, were constructed in the present study. The knockdown efficiency was ~45 and 70% in MDA-MB-231 cells, following stable transfection with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1, respectively (Fig. 1A). Additionally, the western blot analysis results indicated that following transfection with si-Dock1, the expression levels of Dock1 and Elmo1 proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells were significantly reduced (P<0.01; Fig. 1B). Furthermore, following transfection with si-Elmo1, the expression levels of Dock1 and Elmo1 proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells were significantly downregulated (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). Therefore, it was confirmed that interfering with the Dock1 and Elmo1 genes could simultaneously impact the expression levels of Dock1 and Elmo1 in MDA-MB-231 cells, which indicated that there is an interaction between Dock1 and Elmo1. Therefore, the CCK-8 assay was performed to measure the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells in the aforementioned treatment groups. The results demonstrate that, compared with the control and NC groups, the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1, for 24 and 48 h, was significantly reduced (P<0.05; Fig. 2A). Subsequently, the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells in the four treatment groups was assessed. Compared with the NC group, significant decreases in proliferation capacity were observed in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1 (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). Taken together, these results suggested that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 inhibited the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Interaction between Dock1 and Elmo1. (A) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and (B) western blot analysis were performed on the expression levels of Dock1 and Elmo1 in MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with an empty vector, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Elmo1. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. NC. Dock1, dedicator of cytokinesis 1; Elmo1, engulfment and cell motility 1; si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 inhibits the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Cell Counting kit-8 and (B) plate colony formation assays were performed to measure the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with an empty vector, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Elmo1. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. NC. Dock1, dedicator of cytokinesis 1; Elmo1, engulfment and cell motility 1; si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control.

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 suppresses the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells

The migration and invasion capacities of MDA-MB-231 cells were also evaluated in the present study. The results of the migration assay revealed that the migration ability of MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1 was significantly weaker than that of the NC group, decreasing from 95.84 to 20.51% and 42.61%, respectively (P<0.01; Fig. 3A). A similar trend was also observed in the invasion ability of MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1, which decreased from 82.61 to 35.22% and 52.64%, respectively (P<0.05; Fig. 3B). Therefore, it was confirmed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 decreased the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 suppresses the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Migration and (B) invasion assays were performed to evaluate the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with an empty vector, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Elmo1. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. NC. Dock1, dedicator of cytokinesis 1; Elmo1, engulfment and cell motility 1; si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control.

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 reduced Rac1 activity and the expression of migration-associated proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells

In the present study, the associated migration mechanisms and Rac1 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells were also assessed. The results revealed that Rac1 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells was significantly reduced by transfecting with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1 (P<0.01; Fig. 4A). Additionally, the expression levels of migration-associated proteins, including focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Talin, and Vinculin, in MDA-MB-231 cells were measured. The RT-qPCR results demonstrated that Dock1 and Elmo1 silencing significantly decreased the expression levels of FAK, Talin and Vinculin in MDA-MB-231 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 4B). Furthermore, western blotting results also revealed similar trends in the levels of migration-associated proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells from each treatment group (Fig. 4C). Based on these results, it was concluded that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 decreased Rac1 activity and reduced the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells by downregulating the expression of FAK, Talin and Vinculin.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 reduces Rac1 activity and the expression of migration-associated proteins in MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) A Rac activity assay was performed to evaluate the Rac1 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and (C) western blot analysis assays were performed to measure the expression levels of FAK, Talin and Vinculin in MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with an empty vector, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Elmo1. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. NC. Dock1, dedicator of cytokinesis 1; Elmo1, engulfment and cell motility 1; Rac1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control.

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 affects the RhoA/Rac1 pathway

Finally, the expression of RhoA GTPase, total RhoA, Rac1 GTPase and total Rac1 was evaluated in MDA-MB-231 cells from all four treatment groups. Western blotting results indicated that the expression level of RhoA GTPase in MDA-MB-231 cells was significantly upregulated by transfecting with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1 (P<0.01; Fig. 5A). Additionally, it was also revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 significantly reduced the expression level of Rac1 GTPase in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 5B; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the total RhoA and total Rac1 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells from all treatment groups (Fig. 5A and B). Therefore, it was concluded that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 affected the RhoA/Rac1 pathway in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 affected the RhoA/Rac1 pathway. Western blot analyses were performed to evaluate the expression levels of (A) RhoA QTPase and RhoA total, and (B) Rac1 GTPase and Rac1 total in MDA-MB-231 cells, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with an empty vector, MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Elmo1. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. NC. Dock1, dedicator of cytokinesis 1; Elmo1, engulfment and cell motility 1; RhoA, Ras homolog gene family, member A; Rac1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control.

Discussion

A previous study has demonstrated that Dock1 and Elmo1 are highly expressed in invasive cancer cells, accelerating cancer progression (23). In addition, an increasing volume of evidence has revealed that the silencing of Dock1 and Elmo1 can impede tumor development, including cell proliferation, invasion and migration (17,24,25). To the best of our knowledge, the roles of Dock1 and Elmo1 in the prevention and treatment of TNBC have not yet been studied. In the present study, plasmids cloned with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1 were prepared. The knockdown efficiency was ~45 and 70% in the MDA-MB-231 cells, following stable transfection with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1, according to the RT-qPCR and western blot analysis data. Additionally, an interaction between Dock1 and Elmo1 was identified, which was consistent with the results of previous studies (15–20). Therefore, the present study further assessed the influences of Dock1 and Elmo1 on cell proliferation. The results revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 significantly inhibited the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Cell motility is important for the majority of pathological and physiological processes, including early embryonic development, wound repair, and tumor cell migration and invasion (26). Previous studies have demonstrated that Dock1 and Elmo1 serve crucial roles in the migration and invasion of various types of tumor cells (23,27–29). Therefore, the effects of Dock1 and Elmo1 on the migration and invasion capacities of MDA-MB-231 cells were assessed. The results indicated that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 could significantly decrease the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Furthermore, by using the Transwell chamber assay, it was demonstrated that Dock1 and Elmo1 synergistically promote the Rac-dependent cell migration process (24). Additionally, the present study also evaluated the Rac1 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with si-Dock1 and si-Elmo1. The results revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 significantly reduced the proliferation ability and Rac1 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, the impact of Dock1 and Elmo1 silencing on the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells was investigated in the present study. Based on previous reports, the expression levels in MDA-MB-231 cells of several migration-associated proteins, including FAK, Talin and Vinculin, were assessed (30–32). The data revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 markedly reduced the expression levels of FAK, Talin and Vinculin in MDA-MB-231 cells. Therefore, it was confirmed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 may decrease the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells by regulating FAK, Talin and Vinculin expression.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the RhoA/Rac1 pathway is involved in the migration and invasion of tumor cells (33–36). In the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells, the RhoA/Rac1 pathway also serves vital functions (36–39). Nonetheless, in TNBC epithelial cells, the role of this pivotal, migration-associated signaling pathway remains unclear. Therefore, the present study measured the expression levels of RhoA GTPase, total RhoA, Rac1 GTPase and total Rac1 in MDA-MB-231 cells from each treatment group, and revealed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 markedly enhanced the expression of RhoA GTPase, while reducing the expression level of Rac1 GTPase. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the total RhoA and Rac1 expression between MDA-MB-231 cells from each treatment group. Therefore, these results confirmed that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 affected the RhoA/Rac1 pathway in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Taken together, the results of the present study demonstrated that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 decreased the migration and invasion abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells by affecting the RhoA/Rac1 pathway. These results provided novel insights into the pathogenesis of TMBC, giving rise to novel possibilities for TNBC therapy.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that the downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 decreased the migration and invasion abilities of TNBC epithelial cells through the RhoA/Rac1 pathway. These results offer crucial insight into the mechanisms of Dock1 and Elmo1 in TNBC epithelial cells. The observed effects of Dock1 and Elmo1 on the migration and invasion of TNBC epithelial cells suggested that Dock1 and Elmo1 may be promising targets for TNBC therapies.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YL was responsible for the design of the experiment. SW and YZ were responsible for processing data. YL was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors confirmed the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:52–62. doi: 10.3322/caac.21203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Donepudi MS, Kondapalli K, Amos SJ, Venkanteshan P. Breast cancer statistics and markers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10:506–511. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.137927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weigelt B, Eberle C, Cowell CF, Ng CK, Reis-Filho JS. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: More than a special type. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:147–148. doi: 10.1038/nrc3637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Denkert C, Liedtke C, Tutt A, von Minckwitz G. Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer-the road to new treatment strategies. Lancet. 2017;389:2430–2442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32454-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: Challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:674–690. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wojciak-Stothard B, Ridley AJ. Rho GTPases and the regulation of endothelial permeability. Vascul Pharmacol. 2002;39:187–199. doi: 10.1016/S1537-1891(03)00008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamai T, Yamanishi T, Shirataki H, Takagi K, Asami H, Ito Y, Yoshida K. Overexpression of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases is associated with progression in testicular cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4799–4805. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0436-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rihet S, Vielh P, Camonis J, Goud B, Chevillard S, de Gunzburg J. Mutation status of genes encoding RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases in a panel of invasive human colorectal and breast tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001;127:733–738. doi: 10.1007/s004320100272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pan Y, Bi F, Liu N, Xue Y, Yao X, Zheng Y, Fan D. Expression of seven main Rho family members in gastric carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;315:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Simpson KJ, Dugan AS, Mercurio AM. Functional analysis of the contribution of RhoA and RhoC GTPases to invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8694–8701. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cote JF, Vuori K. GEF what? Dock180 and related proteins help Rac to polarize cells in new ways. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:383–393. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Feng H, Hu B, Liu KW, Li Y, Lu X, Cheng T, Yiin JJ, Lu S, Keezer S, Fenton T, et al. Activation of Rac1 by Src-dependent phosphorylation of Dock180 (Y1811) mediates PDGFRα-stimulated glioma tumorigenesis in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4670–4684. doi: 10.1172/JCI58559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gumienny TL, Brugnera E, Tosello-Trampont AC, Kinchen JM, Haney LB, Nishiwaki K, Walk SF, Nemergut ME, Macara IG, Francis R, et al. CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and cell migration. Cell. 2001;107:27–41. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00520-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim K, Lee J, Lee SA, Moon H, Park B, Kim D, Joo YE, Park D. Intermolecular steric inhibition of Ephexin4 is relieved by Elmo1. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04810-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hamoud N, Tran V, Croteau LP, Kania A, Cote JF. G-protein coupled receptor BAI3 promotes myoblast fusion in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:3745–3750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313886111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hochreiter-Hufford AE, Lee CS, Kinchen JM, Sokolowski JD, Arandjelovic S, Call JA, Klibanov AL, Yan Z, Mandell JW, Ravichandran KS. Phosphatidylserine receptor BAI1 and apoptotic cells as new promoters of myoblast fusion. Nature. 2013;497:263–267. doi: 10.1038/nature12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katoh H, Negishi M. RhoG activates Rac1 by direct interaction with the Dock180-binding protein Elmo. Nature. 2003;424:461–464. doi: 10.1038/nature01817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Park D, Ravichandran KS. Emerging roles of brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;706:167–178. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7913-1_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Park D, Tosello-Trampont AC, Elliott MR, Lu M, Haney LB, Ma Z, Klibanov AL, Mandell JW, Ravichandran KS. BAI1 is an engulfment receptor for apoptotic cells upstream of the ELMO/Dock180/Rac module. Nature. 2007;450:430–434. doi: 10.1038/nature06329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xiao Y, Peng Y, Wan J, Tang G, Chen Y, Tang J, Ye WC, Ip NY, Shi L. The atypical guanine nucleotide exchange factor Dock4 regulates neurite differentiation through modulation of Rac1 GTPase and actin dynamics. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:20034–20045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.458612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Laurin M, Huber J, Pelletier A, Houalla T, Park M, Fukui Y, Haibe-Kains B, Muller WJ, Côté JF. Rac-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK1 is a critical regulator of HER2-mediated breast cancer metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:7434–7439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213050110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jarzynka MJ, Hu B, Hui KM, Bar-Joseph I, Gu W, Hirose T, Haney LB, Ravichandran KS, Nishikawa R, Cheng SY. ELMO1 and Dock180, a bipartite Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor, promote human glioma cell invasion. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7203–7211. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grimsley CM, Kinchen JM, Tosello-Trampont AC, Brugnera E, Haney LB, Lu M, Chen Q, Klingele D, Hengartner MO, Ravichandran KS. Dock180 and ELMO1 proteins cooperate to promote evolutionarily conserved Rac-dependent cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:6087–6097. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307087200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang J, Dai JM, Che YL, Gao YM, Peng HJ, Liu B, Wang H, Linghu H. Elmo1 helps dock180 to regulate Rac1 activity and cell migration of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:844–850. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balassa T, Berta G, Jakab L, Bohonyi N, Szekeres-Bartho J. The effect of the Progesterone-Induced Blocking Factor (PIBF) on E-cadherin expression, cell motility and invasion of primary tumour cell lines. J Reprod Immunol. 2018;125:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2017.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sanders MA, Ampasala D, Basson MD. DOCK5 and DOCK1 regulate Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cell spreading and migration on collagen IV. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:27–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808010200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shi L, Zhang B, Sun X, Zhang X, Lv S, Li H, Wang X, Zhao C, Zhang H, Xie X, et al. CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) promotes migration and invasion of lung cancer cells by binding to Nir1 through Nir1-ELMO1/DOC180 signaling pathway. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55:2051–2062. doi: 10.1002/mc.22450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tajiri H, Uruno T, Shirai T, Takaya D, Matsunaga S, Setoyama D, Watanabe M, Kukimoto-Niino M, Oisaki K, Ushijima M, et al. Targeting ras-driven cancer cell survival and invasion through selective inhibition of DOCK1. Cell Rep. 2017;19:969–980. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gu S, Papadopoulou N, Nasir O, Föller M, Alevizopoulos K, Lang F, Stournaras C. Activation of membrane androgen receptors in colon cancer inhibits the prosurvival signals Akt/bad in vitro and in vivo and blocks migration via vinculin/actin signaling. Mol Med. 2011;17:48–58. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2010.00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huang C, Rajfur Z, Yousefi N, Chen Z, Jacobson K, Ginsberg MH. Talin phosphorylation by Cdk5 regulates Smurf1-mediated talin head ubiquitylation and cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:624–630. doi: 10.1038/ncb1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sieg DJ, Hauck CR, Ilic D, Klingbeil CK, Schaefer E, Damsky CH, Schlaepfer DD. FAK integrates growth-factor and integrin signals to promote cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:249–256. doi: 10.1038/35010517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dreissigacker U, Mueller MS, Unger M, Siegert P, Genze F, Gierschik P, Giehl K. Oncogenic K-Ras down-regulates Rac1 and RhoA activity and enhances migration and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells through activation of p38. Cell Signal. 2006;18:1156–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gulhati P, Bowen KA, Liu J, Stevens PD, Rychahou PG, Chen M, Lee EY, Weiss HL, O'Connor KL, Gao T, Evers BM. mTORC1 and mTORC2 regulate EMT, motility, and metastasis of colorectal cancer via RhoA and Rac1 signaling pathways. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3246–3256. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parri M, Chiarugi P. Rac and Rho GTPases in cancer cell motility control. Cell Commun Signal. 2010;8:23. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-8-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao Y, Li J, Xing Y, Wang J, Lu C, Xin X, Geng M. N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V mediates cell migration and invasion of mouse mammary tumor cells 4TO7 via RhoA and Rac1 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;309:199–208. doi: 10.1007/s11010-007-9656-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baugher PJ, Krishnamoorthy L, Price JE, Dharmawardhane SF. Rac1 and Rac3 isoform activation is involved in the invasive and metastatic phenotype of human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R965–R974. doi: 10.1186/bcr1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bourguignon LY, Zhu H, Shao L, Chen YW. CD44 interaction with tiam1 promotes Rac1 signaling and hyaluronic acid-mediated breast tumor cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:1829–1838. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Burbelo P, Wellstein A, Pestell RG. Altered Rho GTPase signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84:43–48. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000018422.02237.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES