Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2018 Jul 2;16(3):3874–3880. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9056

Suppression of Hiwi inhibits the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells

Guangjun Pei 1, Baojian Li 2, Anjun Ma 3,✉
PMCID: PMC6096176  PMID: 30128001

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy. Hiwi exhibits a high level of expression in cervical cancer cells. However, the effects of Hiwi expression in cervical cancer cells remain unresolved. In the present study, the effects of Hiwi downregulation on the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells were investigated. The results of the present study revealed that the suppression of Hiwi was able to inhibit the proliferation of cervical cancer cells and arrest cell cycle at G1 phase. The downregulation of Hiwi was also revealed to inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process of cervical cancer cells by regulating the expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, and snail. The present study demonstrated that the suppression of Hiwi was able to inhibit the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells. Therefore, the results suggest that Hiwi may function as an oncogene in cervical cancer cells and may become a potential target for cervical cancer therapy.

Keywords: Hiwi, cervical cancer, proliferation, cell cycle, epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies globally and is one of the leading causes of mortality resulting from gynecologic malignancies (1). In recent years, the incidence of cervical cancer has decreased. However, the rate of cervical cancer-associated morbidity in young adult women has increased.

The members of the Piwi protein family are highly conserved during evolution and serve notable roles in cell proliferation, gametogenesis, germ cell proliferation and translational regulation (2–4). Hiwi is a human homologue of the Piwi family, located on chromosome 12q24.33 and encoding a 98.5 kDa protein. Hiwi is expressed in CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, but not in well-differentiated cell populations (5). Hiwi serves a function in the development of hematopoietic stem cells (5). Prior studies have demonstrated that Hiwi is also expressed in various types of cancer cells and affects the differentiation and proliferation of tumor cells (2,6–11). Overexpression of Hiwi is reported to lead to tumors (11).

Hiwi exhibits an increased level of expression in cervical cancer cells (12,13). However, the function of Hiwi in cervical cancer cells remains unclear. In the present study, the effects of siRNA induced-knockdown of Hiwi on the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells were investigated. The present study reveals that Hiwi may act as an oncogene in cervical cancer cells and may therefore be a novel target for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human cervical cancer cells, HeLa, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Transfection

Hiwi specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) (sequence, 5′-GCCGUUCAUACAAGACUAATT-3′ and 5′-UUAGUCUUGUAUGAACGGCTT-3′) and a scrambled negative control (sequence, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′) were obtained from Biomics Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (Nantong, China). The cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1×105 cells/well). After 24 h, the cell medium was changed to serum-free medium for an additional 6 h. Then 100 pmol siRNA or its corresponding negative control was transfected into the cells using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. At 6 h post-transfection, the cell medium was changed to fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. After culturing at 37°C for additional 48 h, the cells in each group were collected for subsequent experiments.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells of each group using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Then the level of Hiwi mRNA was measured using RT-qPCR with the cDNA as the template and primers as follows: Hiwi forward, 5′-ATGGCCATCTACAAGCAGTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GACAGTGCTCGCTTAGTGC-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-CACCCACTCCTCCACCTTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG-3′. The qPCR was performed on a StepOne PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec; and then kept at 4°C for 10 min. SYBR-Green reagent was obtained from Biomics Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. The level of Hiwi mRNA was normalized to GAPDH, and the relative mRNA level of Hiwi was calculated using the 2−∆∆Cq method (14).

Western blot analysis

The cells transfected with negative control or siRNA were harvested and proteins in cells were extracted on ice using radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer. The concentration of the proteins was measured using a Enhanced BCA Protein Assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). 40 µg proteins were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Following blocking with 5% skimmed milk at 37°C for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against Hiwi (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-22685; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; 1:2,000; cat. no. sc-25280; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), cyclin A (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-751; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), cyclin D1 (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-70899; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), E-cadherin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-71009; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), N-cadherin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-59987; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), vimentin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-5565; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), snail family transcriptional repressor 1 (SNAIL; 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-28199; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and β-actin (1:2,000; cat. no. sc-130065; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 4°C overnight. Following washing with Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated with corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (cat. no. A0208), HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (cat. no. A0216), or HRP-labeled donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L) (cat. no. A0181) (1:5,000; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at 37°C for 1 h. Following washing with TBST, the targeted proteins were visualized using an Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (ECL) (EMD Millipore). The relative protein level was analyzed by Quantity One 4.6 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and calculated as targeted protein level/reference protein level.

MTT assay

Following transfection, the cells (3×103 cells/well) were seeded into 96-wells plates. The cell viability was measured using MTT assay. Briefly, MTT at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml was added into the cells in each group at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h and cultured at 37°C for an additional 4 h. The supernatant was removed, and 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was added into each well. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured with a microplate reader.

Cell cycle detection

The cells were transfectged with neative control or siRNA, and cell cycle of the cells in each group was evaluated using flow cytometry at 48 h with a Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Briefly, the cells in each group were collected, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight. Following washing with ice-cold PBS, the cells were resuspended in 500 µl binding buffer and then 25 µl propidium iodide and 10 µl RNaseA were added into cells in each group. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Transwell assay

Following transfection with Hiwi siRNA or negative control, the cells were collected and suspended (1×105 cells/ml). The Transwell inserts (Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA, USA) were inserted into a 24-well plate. Subsequently, 200 µl cell suspension was added into the upper chambers, and 600 µl DMEM containing 20% FBS was added into the lower chambers. The cells were allowed to migrate at 37°C for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells above the membranes were removed with cotton swabs. The cells below the membranes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet at room temperature for 15 min. The cells were observed via light microscopy using a ×200 magnification. The cells in each field of view were counted, and the average number of cells in five randomly selected fields of view was calculated as the number of migratory cells.

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Hiwi siRNA decreases the level of Hiwi in cervical cancer cells

Hiwi siRNA was used to investigate the effects of Hiwi on cervical cancer cells. Following transfection with Hiwi siRNA or the negative control, the relative level of Hiwi mRNA was detected using RT-qPCR. The results revealed that the relative level of Hiwi mRNA was decreased to 11.01±4.78% following transfection with Hiwi siRNA (Fig. 1A). Western blot analysis demonstrated similar results to RT-qPCR. Compared with the control group, the relative protein level of Hiwi was decreased from 1.64±0.28 to 0.33±0.09 following transfection with Hiwi siRNA (Fig. 1B and C). These results demonstrated that Hiwi siRNA was able to effectively decrease the levels of mRNA and protein in cervical cancer cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Hiwi siRNA decreases the levels of mRNA and protein in cervical cancer cells. (A) The level of Hiwi mRNA in cervical cancer cells was analyzed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The relative level of Hiwi mRNA was normalized to GAPDH. (B) The level of Hiwi protein in cervical cancer cells was detected using western blotting with β-actin as the internal reference. (C) The relative level of Hiwi protein in each group was calculated. All experiments were repeated three times, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. **P<0.01 vs. control cells. ***P<0.001 vs. control cells. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Downregulation of Hiwi inhibits the proliferation of cervical cancer cells

Following transfection with Hiwi siRNA or the negative control, the proliferation of cervical cancer cells was detected using MTT assay. As presented in Fig. 2A, compared with the control group, the proliferation of the cells was significantly inhibited by transfection with Hiwi siRNA. The level of PCNA protein was detected by western blotting. The results of western blot analysis revealed that, following transfection with Hiwi siRNA, the relative level of PCNA protein was decreased from 1.30±0.178 to 0.49±0.06 (Fig. 2B and C). These results support the hypothesis that transfection with Hiwi siRNA inhibits the proliferation of cervical cancer cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Hiwi inhibits the proliferation of cervical cancer cells. (A) The viability of cervical cancer cells was detected using MTT assay following transfection with Hiwi siRNA or negative control. (B) The level of PCNA protein in cervical cancer cells was detected using western blotting following transfection. β-actin was used as the internal reference. (C) The relative level of PCNA protein in each group was calculated. All experiments were repeated three times, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. control cells. siRNA, small interfering RNA; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Downregulation of Hiwi inhibits the cell cycle of cervical cancer cells

The cell cycle has an important function in the growth of cancer cells, thus the effects of Hiwi siRNA on the cell cycle of cervical cancer cells were investigated using flow cytometry. The results of flow cytometry revealed that following transfection with Hiwi siRNA, the percentage of cells in the G1 phase was increased from 53.37±2.87 to 64.78±3.49% (Fig. 3A and B). The levels of cyclin A and cyclin D1 proteins, which are important cytokines regulating the cell cycle progress, were also detected using western blotting. Western blot analysis revealed that following transfection with Hiwi siRNA, the relative level of cyclin A protein was decreased from 0.66±0.16 to 0.17±0.03 (Fig. 3C and D). The relative level of cyclin D1 protein was also decreased from 0.77±0.15 to 0.12±0.02 (Fig. 3E and F). These results demonstrated that Hiwi siRNA may have an inhibitory effect on the cell cycle of cervical cancer cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Hiwi arrests the cell cycle in cervical cancer cells. (A) The cell cycle of cervical cancer cells was detected using flow cytometry. (B) The percentage of cells in the G1 phase was calculated. (C) The level of cyclin A protein was detected using western blotting. (D) The relative level of cyclin A protein in each group was calculated. (E) The protein level of cyclin D1 was detected using western blotting. (F) The relative level of cyclin D1 protein in each group was calculated. All experiments were repeated three times, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. control cells. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Hiwi siRNA inhibits the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells

Following transfection with Hiwi siRNA, the migration of cervical cancer cells was evaluated using Transwell assay. The results of the Transwell assay identified that the number of migratory cells was decreased significantly in cells transfected with Hiwi siRNA compared with the control cells (Fig. 4A and B). The levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin and snail proteins were detected using western blotting. The results of western blotting revealed that following transfection with Hiwi siRNA, the relative level of E-cadherin protein was increased from 0.22±0.05 to 0.84±0.17 (Fig. 5A and B). However the relative level of N-cadherin protein was decreased from 0.96±0.14 to 0.17±0.03 (Fig. 5C and D). The relative level of vimentin protein was decreased from 0.77±0.14 to 0.24±0.05 (Fig. 5E and F), and the relative level of snail protein was decreased from 0.26±0.04 to 0.14±0.04 (Fig. 5G and H). These results indicate the inhibitory effects of Hiwi siRNA on epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Hiwi inhibits the migration of cervical cancer cells. Transwell assay was performed to evaluate the changes in the migratory capability of cervical cancer cells. The cells were visualized using an optical microscope at a magnification of ×200. ***P<0.001 vs. control cells. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of Hiwi increases the level of E-cadherin and decreases the levels of N-cadherin, vimentin and snail. (A) The level of E-cadherin protein was detected using western blotting. (B) The relative level of E-cadherin protein was calculated using β-actin as the internal reference. (C) Western blotting was used to detect the protein level of N-cadherin. (D) The relative expression level of N-cadherin was calculated using β-actin as the internal reference. (E) The protein level of vimentin was detected by western blotting. (F) The relative level of vimentin protein was calculated using β-actin as an internal reference. (G) Western blotting was used to detect the level of snail protein. (H) The relative level of snail protein was calculated using β-actin as the internal reference. All experiments were repeated three times, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. control cells. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. control cells. siRNA, small interfering RNA; SNAIL, zinc finger protein SNAI1.

Discussion

In the present study, the effects of downregulating Hiwi in cervical cancer cells were investigated. The results of the present study demonstrated that suppression of Hiwi was able to inhibit the proliferation of cervical cancer cells and arrest cell cycle at the G1 phase. The downregulation of Hiwi was also able to inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process. Taken together, these results suggest that Hiwi may be a potential target for cervical cancer therapy.

Hiwi is overexpressed in various types of cancer, including colon (15,16), liver (17), stomach (2) and pancreatic cancer (7), and is associated with the growth, migration and angiogenesis of cancer cells (11,18). Hiwi contributes to tumorigenesis, serves as a potential biomarker of certain types of cancer (17) and is regarded to be an indicator of poor prognosis (2,6–8,19). Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of Hiwi is associated with the histological grade of cancer, however associations with age, gender, tumor size or location were not observed (10,17). Additionally, Hiwi was revealed to be highly expressed in cervical cancer tissues (12,13), which indicates that Hiwi may exhibit an association with cervical cancer progression. The results of the present study demonstrated that the downregulation of Hiwi was able to inhibit the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cells. These data indicate that Hiwi may serve an oncogenic function in cervical cancer cells. However, the present study was performed in only one cervical cancer cell line, which is a limitation of the study. Additional in vitro and in vivo experiments are required to further strengthen the findings of the present study.

Liu et al (12) demonstrated that Hiwi may be involved in cervical cancer carcinogenesis and may be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of cervical cancer. Liu et al (12) demonstrated that the expression of Hiwi was associated with the stage of cervical cancer, but exhibited no association with the other clinical characteristics. Furthermore, another study (2) also demonstrated that by blocking endogenous Hiwi expression, it was able to inhibit the proliferation of gastric cancer cells. Liang et al (11) demonstrated that the proliferation of lung cancer cells was inhibited by downregulating Hiwi.

In the present study, the effects of silencing Hiwi on the growth of cervical cancer cells were investigated. The results revealed that the proliferation of cervical cancer cells was inhibited by transfection with Hiwi siRNA, with decreased levels of PCNA following transfection. Consistently, Liu et al (12) demonstrated that Hiwi promoted tumorigenicity of cervical cancer in vitro and in vivo. However, when it came to the growth of cervical cancer cell lines in vitro, Hiwi was revealed to inhibit the viability of the cervical cancer cell lines, SiHa (12). The results of the present study did not verify these findings, but the results were consistent with the results of previous studies (2,11,18). This difference may require further investigation.

Cell cycle analysis of the cervical cancer cells was also undertaken in the present study. The results of the present study demonstrated that cell cycle was arrested upon silencing of Hiwi. Additionally, the levels of cyclin A and cyclin D1 proteins, which are regulators of the cell cycle (20), were also decreased following transfection with Hiwi siRNA. This suggests that the cell cycle of cervical cancer cells was arrested at the G1 phase by downregulation of Hiwi. Consistent with the present study, the results of Wang et al (18) also identified that the downregulation of Hiwi was able to induce cell cycle arrest of glioma cells. However, the results of Liu et al (2) demonstrated that the cell cycle of gastric cancer cells was arrested by Hiwi suppression at the G2/M phase. The molecular mechanisms underlying these differences should be investigated further.

The assays investigating the effects of Hiwi downregulation on the proliferation and cell cycle demonstrated that the growth of cervical cancer cells was inhibited by silencing of Hiwi. In addition to the effects on proliferation and cell cycle, Hiwi is also able to affect cell apoptosis. The results from Wang et al (18) demonstrated that Hiwi suppression induced cell apoptosis in glioma cells. Liang et al (11) also reported that cell apoptosis in lung cancer cells was promoted by suppression of Hiwi.

In the present study, the effects of Hiwi downregulation on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in cervical cancer cells were also detected. The results of the present study demonstrated that the downregulation of Hiwi was able to increase the level of E-cadherin, and decrease the level of N-cadherin, vimentin and snail, which are hallmarks of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (21–25), suggesting that suppression of Hiwi was able to inhibit the EMT process. The results of Wang et al (18) demonstrated that suppression of Hiwi was also able to inhibit the migration and invasion of glioma cells with decreased expression of matrix metalloprotein-2 and matrix metalloprotein-9 which are associatd with degradation of the extracellular matrix, thus contributing to the migration and invasion of cells (26,27). Jiang et al (17) demonstrated that the expression of Hiwi was associated with metastasis to intrahepatic tissue, local lymph nodes and remote organs. Raeisossadati et al (15) also demonstrated that Hiwi expression was associated with tumor invasion depth. Hiwi is also associated with the angiogenesis of cancer (9).

To conclude, in the present study, the effects of Hiwi on the growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition process of cervical cancer cells was investigated. The results of the present study indicated that the suppression of Hiwi was able to inhibit the growth of cervical cancer cells and arrest the cell cycle. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition was also inhibited by the downregulation of Hiwi. The present study indicates that Hiwi may act as an oncogene in cervical cancer cells, and that it may be a target for novel cervical cancer therapy.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

PCNA

proliferating cell nuclear antigen

TBST

Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20

DMEM

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium

FBS

fetal bovine serum

EMT

epithelial-mesenchymal transition

References

  • 1.Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2675–2686. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu X, Sun Y, Guo J, Ma H, Li J, Dong B, Jin G, Zhang J, Wu J, Meng L, Shou C. Expression of hiwi gene in human gastric cancer was associated with proliferation of cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:1922–1929. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seto AG, Kingston RE, Lau NC. The coming of age for Piwi proteins. Mol Cell. 2007;26:603–609. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hutvagner G, Simard MJ. Argonaute proteins: Key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:22–32. doi: 10.1038/nrm2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sharma AK, Nelson MC, Brandt JE, Wessman M, Mahmud N, Weller KP, Hoffman R. Human CD34(+) stem cells express the hiwi gene, a human homologue of the Drosophila gene piwi. Blood. 2001;97:426–434. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.2.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Qiao D, Zeeman AM, Deng W, Looijenga LH, Lin H. Molecular characterization of hiwi, a human member of the piwi gene family whose overexpression is correlated to seminomas. Oncogene. 2002;21:3988–3999. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grochola LF, Greither T, Taubert H, Möller P, Knippschild U, Udelnow A, Henne-Bruns D, Würl P. The stem cell-associated Hiwi gene in human adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Expression and risk of tumour-related death. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1083–1088. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taubert H, Greither T, Kaushal D, Würl P, Bache M, Bartel F, Kehlen A, Lautenschläger C, Harris L, Kraemer K, et al. Expression of the stem cell self-renewal gene Hiwi and risk of tumour-related death in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. Oncogene. 2007;26:1098–1100. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li S, Meng L, Zhu C, Wu L, Bai X, Wei J, Lu Y, Zhou J, Ma D. The universal overexpression of a cancer testis antigen hiwi is associated with cancer angiogenesis. Oncol Rep. 2010;23:1063–1068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He W, Wang Z, Wang Q, Fan Q, Shou C, Wang J, Giercksky KE, Nesland JM, Suo Z. Expression of HIWI in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is significantly associated with poorer prognosis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:426. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang D, Fang Z, Dong M, Liang C, Xing C, Zhao J, Yang Y. Effect of RNA interference-related HiWi gene expression on the proliferation and apoptosis of lung cancer stem cells. Oncol Lett. 2012;4:146–150. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu W, Gao Q, Chen K, Xue X, Li M, Chen Q, Zhu G, Gao Y. Hiwi facilitates chemoresistance as a cancer stem cell marker in cervical cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:1853–1860. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu WK, Jiang XY, Zhang ZX. Expression of PSCA, PIWIL1 and TBX2 and its correlation with HPV16 infection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical squamous cell carcinoma specimens. Arch Virol. 2010;155:657–663. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0635-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raeisossadati R, Abbaszadegan MR, Moghbeli M, Tavassoli A, Kihara AH, Forghanifard MM. Aberrant expression of DPPA2 and HIWI genes in colorectal cancer and their impacts on poor prognosis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:5299–5305. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1690-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeng Y, Qu LK, Meng L, Liu CY, Dong B, Xing XF, Wu J, Shou CC. HIWI expression profile in cancer cells and its prognostic value for patients with colorectal cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:2144–2149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang J, Zhang H, Tang Q, Hao B, Shi R. Expression of HIWI in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;61:53–58. doi: 10.1007/s12013-011-9160-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang X, Tong X, Gao H, Yan X, Xu X, Sun S, Wang Q, Wang J. Silencing HIWI suppresses the growth, invasion and migration of glioma cells. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:2385–2392. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Taubert H, Würl P, Greither T, Kappler M, Bache M, Bartel F, Kehlen A, Lautenschläger C, Harris LC, Kaushal D, et al. Stem cell-associated genes are extremely poor prognostic factors for soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Oncogene. 2007;26:7170–7174. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: Roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140:3079–3093. doi: 10.1242/dev.091744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lin Y, Dong C, Zhou BP. Epigenetic regulation of EMT: The Snail story. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:1698–1705. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schmalhofer O, Brabletz S, Brabletz T. E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and ZEB1 in malignant progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:151–166. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9179-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Radice GL. N-cadherin-mediated adhesion and signaling from development to disease: Lessons from mice. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;116:263–289. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394311-8.00012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Przybyla L, Muncie JM, Weaver VM. Mechanical control of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in development and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2016;32:527–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kokkinos MI, Wafai R, Wong MK, Newgreen DF, Thompson EW, Waltham M. Vimentin and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer-observations in vitro and in vivo. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;185:191–203. doi: 10.1159/000101320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Webb AH, Gao BT, Goldsmith ZK, Irvine AS, Saleh N, Lee RP, Lendermon JB, Bheemreddy R, Zhang Q, Brennan RC, et al. Inhibition of MMP-2 and MMP-9 decreases cellular migration, and angiogenesis in in vitro models of retinoblastoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:434. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3418-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Itoh Y, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer. Essays Biochem. 2002;38:21–36. doi: 10.1042/bse0380021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES