Abstract
Corynebacterium diphtheriae is a globally important Gram-positive aerobic Actinobacterium capable of causing the toxin-mediated disease, diphtheria. Diphtheria was a major cause of childhood mortality prior to the introduction of the toxoid vaccine, yet it is capable of rapid resurgence following the breakdown of healthcare provision, vaccination or displacement of people. The mechanism and treatment of toxin-mediated disease is well understood, however there are key gaps in our knowledge on the basic biology of C. diphtheriae particularly relating to host colonisation, the nature of asymptomatic carriage, population genomics and host adaptation.
Keywords: Corynebacterium diphtheriae, diphtheria, toxin, exotoxin, actinobacteria
Taxonomy
Domain Bacteria, phylum Actinobacteria, order Corynebacteriales, family Corynebacteriaceae, genus Corynebacterium, species C. diphtheriae. It is often further divided into four biovars (belfanti, intermedius, gravis, mitis) based on biochemical testing, however this is not well supported by genomic analysis [1].
Properties
C. diphtheriae is a Gram-positive, aerobic, non-sporulating, non-capsulated and non-motile bacterium of around 2 µm in length. C. diphtheriae is the aetiological agent of the upper respiratory disease diphtheria and is generally considered an archetypal upper respiratory mucosal pathogen, however in recent years it has become apparent that invasive strains exist [2]. Diphtheria is a toxin-mediated disease, caused by strains lysogenized by the temperate β-corynephage which carry the iron-regulated diphtheria-toxin gene [3]. C. diphtheriae possesses a complex cell envelope architecture consisting of peptidoglycan linked to a layer arabinogalactan decorated with mycolic acids and glycolipids [4].
Genome
The genome of C. diphtheriae is around 2.45 Mbp, with a core genome of around 1632 genes and a pan-genome of around 4786 genes [5]. The genome has a G+C content of approximately 53.5 % with a coding density of around 88 % [6]. The differences between genomes is largely confined to the presence of prophages, transposons, restriction-modification systems and CRISPR elements. A total of 57 genomic islands have been identified and it appears that recombination plays an important role in C. diphtheriae genome evolution [2]. There is some variation in the genomes that relate to pathogenicity, with β-corynephage carriage being variable between strains and its presence does not correlate with MLST or biovar designations. Additionally, non-toxigenic, tox gene-bearing strains are also found as clinical isolates. Variation is also observed in the pilli encoding spa operons, with at least two operons being present in all strains, but with varying numbers of pilus subunit encoding genes being found within genomes. This variation in pilus structure correlates well with the ability of C. diphtheriae strains to cause severe, invasive non-toxigenic disease [5, 7].
Phylogeny
The genus Corynebacterium forms a monophyletic family within the order Corynebacteriales [8]. The phylogenetic relationships within this group are complex and only the closely related zoonotic pathogens C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans are capable of causing diphtheria-toxin-mediated disease along with C. diphtheriae [9]. This suggests that C. diphtheriae strains may have initially emerged as a pathogen in animals prior to human host adaptation.
Key features and discoveries
Toxigenic C. diphtheriae is responsible for causing severe, inflammatory, toxin-mediated upper respiratory tract disease characterized by the presence of a grey layer of dead tissue termed the pseudomembrane. Initial symptoms are characterized by severe sore throats, high temperature and can often lead to death. The diphtheria AB exotoxin binds to host heparin-binding epidermal growth factor precursor. The toxin is subsequently endocytosed and processed within the cell, resulting in the ribosylation of eEF-2 causing inhibition of protein synthesis leading to cell death (see Graphical abstract). In addition to toxin-mediated disease, significant human disease can be caused by non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains, which are now emerging as a significant cause of infections such as persistent sore throats, endocarditis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis and cutaneous infections [2].
C. diphtheriae was first isolated by Loeffler [10] and was one of the first applications of ‘Koch's Postulates' to confirm the aetiological agent of a disease. Prior to the introduction of the vaccine in industrialized countries in the 1940s and 1950s, diphtheria was a leading cause of child mortality. Diphtheria remains a significant health problem in countries with poor routine vaccine coverage and under-reporting of cases in certain areas suggests the burden of disease is likely to be greater than reported. The introduction of the vaccine and the subsequent global immunization initiative reduced cases to around 5000 per year globally. Major post-vaccination epidemics have included those in the 1990s in the former Soviet Union states (>157 000 cases and around 5000 deaths), notable outbreaks in Colombia, India, Norway, Nigeria, Thailand, Brazil, Laos [2] and most recently in 2017 in Indonesia, Venezuela and Bangladesh. The majority of these outbreaks can be linked to the collapse of healthcare provision due to social upheaval or the displacement of people due to armed conflict, famine, natural disasters and economic changes. This emphasizes the efficacy and importance of vaccination programmes, prior to and during outbreaks, and highlights that diphtheria can rapidly re-emerge given the right conditions with devastating effects.
The diphtheria vaccine is a toxoid composed of formaldehyde inactivated diphtheria exotoxin. The vaccine is normally delivered in combination with tetanus and acellular pertussis to children under 7 years of age, although in the UK (as of August 2017) it is now delivered as part of the 6 in 1 vaccine given at 8, 12 and 16 weeks. Treatment of diphtheria is normally with antitoxin, to neutralize the effects of circulating exotoxin along with a course of antibiotics (usually penicillin or erythromycin). Non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae infections usually respond to penicillin or erythromycin treatment, with antibiotic resistance not commonly observed in C. diphtheriae strains.
Key questions
We have little understanding of asymptomatic carriage of non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains as part of the natural upper respiratory tract microbial community, yet there is potential for these strains to undergo phage conversion (to produce toxin) followed by dissemination resulting in disease outbreaks. Is this a major driver in the rapid resurgence of diphtheria in unvaccinated and/or displaced populations?
What factors govern the colonization, persistence and invasive nature of C. diphtheriae in the naso-pharynx beyond the few relatively well-known virulence factors?
Does vaccine-driven selection play a role in the emergence of non-toxigenic invasive C. diphtheriae strains?
Vaccinated individuals produce antibodies to neutralize the effects of the exotoxin but it is unclear if this is sufficient to prevent colonization or eliminate non-toxigenic strains from the host.
Funding information
The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviation: eEF-2, eukaryotic elongation factor 2.
Edited by: G. Preston
References
- 1.Sangal V, Burkovski A, Hunt AC, Edwards B, Blom J, et al. A lack of genetic basis for biovar differentiation in clinically important Corynebacterium diphtheriae from whole genome sequencing. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:54–57. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sangal V, Hoskisson PA. Evolution, epidemiology and diversity of Corynebacterium diphtheriae: new perspectives on an old foe. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;43:364–370. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sangal V, Hoskisson PA. Corynephages: infections of the infectors. In: Burkovski A, editor. Corynebacterium Diphtheriae and Related Toxigenic Species. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. pp. 67–82. (editor) [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eggeling L, Besra GS, Alderwick L. In: Structure and Synthesis of the Cell Wall in Corynebacteria. Burkovski A, editor. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press; 2008. pp. 267–294. (editor) [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trost E, Blom J, Soares SC, Huang IH, Al-Dilaimi A, et al. Pangenomic study of Corynebacterium diphtheriae that provides insights into the genomic diversity of pathogenic isolates from cases of classical diphtheria, endocarditis, and pneumonia. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:3199–3215. doi: 10.1128/JB.00183-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Efstratiou A, Dover LG, Holden MT, Pallen M, et al. The complete genome sequence and analysis of Corynebacterium diphtheriae NCTC13129. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:6516–6523. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sangal V, Blom J, Sutcliffe IC, von Hunolstein C, Burkovski A, et al. Adherence and invasive properties of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains correlates with the predicted membrane-associated and secreted proteome. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:765–779. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1980-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tauch A, Sandbote J. The family Corynebacteriaceae. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, et al., editors. The Prokaryotes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. (editors) [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bonmarin I, Guiso N, Le Flèche-Matéos A, Patey O, Patrick AD, et al. Diphtheria: a zoonotic disease in France? Vaccine. 2009;27:4196–4200. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loeffler F. Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Mikroorganismen für die Entstehung der Diphtherie beim Menschen, bei der Traube und beim Kalbe. Mitt KJin Gesundh. 1884;2:421–499. [Google Scholar]