Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Pathology Journal logoLink to The Plant Pathology Journal
. 2018 Aug 1;34(4):308–315. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.02.2018.0017

Occurrence of the Root-Knot Nematode species in Vegetable Crops in Souss Region of Morocco

Soukaina Janati 1,2, Abdellah Houari 1, Ahmed Wifaya 2, Adil Essarioui 5, Abdelaziz Mimouni 2, Abderrahim Hormatallah 6, Mohamed Sbaghi 3, Abdelfattah A Dababat 4, Fouad Mokrini 2,*
PMCID: PMC6097824  PMID: 30140184

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes ‘Meloidogyne spp’ are the most destructive group of plant parasitic nematodes causeing serious losses in vegetables crops and this damages worsened when crops grown under greenhouses conditions. In this sutdy, the distribution and characterization of root-knot nematode species collected from the Souss region of Morocco where vegetables crops intensively cultivated were determined by using both morphological and molecular tools. Out of the 110 samples collected from different greenhouses 91 (81.7%) were found to be infested with root-knot nematodes. Thirty-seven populations of root-knot nematodes were morphologically identified based on perineal patterns as well as molecularlly using species-specific primers. The obtained results indicated that Meloidogyne javanica and M. incognita were identified in 86.4% and 13.5% of the total populations, respectively. The lowest incidence of root-knot nematodes (64%) was found in Toussous, whereas the highest frequencies of 100% and 90% were detected in Taddart and Biogra, respectively. As the majority of the samples have been infested with Meloidogyne species; this indicates that there is an urgent need to provide farmers with a proper control strategy.

Keywords: occurrence, perineal patterns, root-knot nematode, vegetable

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.; RKN) are the most frequently observed and damaging plant-parasitic nematodes in vegetable production (Jones et al., 2013). Symptoms associated with RKN can be easily diagnosed by farmers due to the presence of distinctive galls on the root systems. RKN infected plants show yellow leaves, stunting growth, nutrient deficiencies symptoms and secondary infections by other pathogens (Hunt and Handoo, 2009). Yield losses depend on the nematode species exists, nematodes initial population, and cultivated crop species (Ornat and Sorribas, 2008). Sasser and Carter (1985) reported yield losses of 22–30% on tomato due to M. incognita infection. In Western Anatolia of Turkey, Meloidogyne spp. caused yield losses of up to 80% in processing tomato-growing areas (Kaskavalci, 2007). Similarly, Sikora and Fernández (2005) reported yield losses of over 30% in three highly susceptible vegetable crops (egg-plant, tomato, and melon). In North-Eastern Spain, the initial nematodes population density of 4750 juveniles of M. javanica per 250 cm−3 of soil caused up to 61% yield reduction in tomato (Verdejo-Lucas et al., 1994).

Thirteen new species of Meloidogyne have been described in the last decade; making more than 100 recognized species in this genus (Elling, 2013; Hunt and Handoo, 2009). Out of the 100 identified Meloidogyne species, 22 occur in Africa, posing a significant threat to crop production by small-holder farmers (Karuri et al., 2017).

In Morocco, the RKNs are among the most relevant group of plant parasitic nematodes and are widely distributed throughout the country. Four species namely; M. javanica, M. incognita, M. arenaria, and M. hapla have been reported in different agricultural areas of Morocco (Janati et al., 1982) with M. incognita and M. javanica reported as the most common existed species (Janati et al., 1982; Merimi, 1987; Mokrini, 2008; Mokrini, 2016). The Atlantic littoral is the most infested area as vegetable crops are extensively grown in this region and its sandy soil structures makes it preferable for nematode development and reproduction (Janati et al., 1982).

Accurate diagnosis of the RKN to species level is essential for the determination of the most appropriate control strategies to be employed (Coyne et al., 2009). This is especially important when identifying potential sources of host-plant resistance against Meloidogyne species. Diagnosis of species and races of Meloidogyne has always been challenging due to the high similarities in their morphology across species, life stages in different habitats, variable host ranges and intraspecific variability (Blok and Powers, 2009). Species of RKN have been identified based on morphological characters (Eisenback and Triantaphyllou, 1991), host-plant response (Hartman and Sasser, 1985), isozyme analyses (Esbenshade and Triantaphyllou, 1990) and molecular techniques (Adam et al., 2007; Powers and Harris, 1993; Powers et al., 1997; Zijlstra et al., 2000). However, identification by morphological characters is time consuming and require skillful researchers to differentiate among the 100 described species (Hunt and Handoo, 2009), makes the value of many of these characters becomes very questionable, often showing large intraspecific variation and often inconclusive for distinguishing closely related Meloidogyne species, because individuals within a population often vary considerably (Zijlastra et al., 2000). Isozymes analysis is an effective method, which can be carried out on females of Meloidogyne spp. (Esbenshade and Triantaphyllou, 1990). However, application of this method only on female individuals is a limited factor, and can be affected by environmental factors. Recently, molecular tools have been progressively developed for the identification of RKN species (Blok and Powers, 2009). Among these, species-specific DNA protocols have provided fast, accurate and sensitive tools for RKN identification (Adam et al., 2007; Blok and Powers, 2009; Powers and Harris, 1993; Powers, 2004; Tigano et al., 2010; Zijlstra et al., 2000).

To our knowledge, RKN in Morocco have only been identified based on morphological basis and there is no information available in literature about the identification of these RKN populations based on molecular tools. For this reason, we conducted a survey of the major vegetable growing areas in the South region of Morocco, with the following main objectives: (a) to study the distribution of RKN in the South region of Morocco, and (b) to identify RKN populations collected from different localities in the South region of Morocco using both traditional morphological features and molecular techniques.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and root-knot nematode cultures

A root-knot nematode survey was conducted in 2016 in different vegetable growing areas of Souss region (South of Morocco). Samples were taken from greenhouses located in Biogra, Khmis Ait Amira, Belfaa, Sidi Bibi, Taddart, Toussous (Fig. 1). For each location, 15–20 greenhouses were sampled. A total of 110 soil and root samples were collected. From each greenhouse, 1–2 plants of 3–6 months old and showing RKN infestation symptoms were selected and uprooted to check galls. Infested roots showing galls symptoms were cut with a knife and packed in polyethylene bags along with some soil, labeled and brought to the Nematology Laboratory at the National Institute of Agronomic Research (INRA-Agadir) for species identification. Each sample was labeled with additional information such as; the current cropping system and information about the previous cropping history obtained from the local farmers or the agricultural officer in charge in the corresponding area. Egg masses were picked up individually from infested roots in each greenhouse using a small needle. These egg masses were surface-sterilized in 0.5% NaOCl as described by Hussey and Barker (1973) then rinsed in tap water 3 times and prepared for inoculation. Each population was established from a single egg mass and reared on susceptible tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum, cv. Prystila F1). Tomato seedlings at the fourth true leaf stage were transplanted singly into 500 mL plastic pots containing sterilized sandy loam soil and sand (2 : 1, v/v) and were allowed to grow for 5–7 days before being inoculated with single egg masses. Plants were maintained in a glasshouse at temperature rate of 25 ± 5°C, artificial light of 16 h per day, and 60 to 90% of relative humidity. Sixty days after inoculation, plants were removed from pots, root systems were gently washed to free of adhering soil particles, and adult females were extracted from the roots. All populations obtained from single egg masses were renewed by transferring 10 egg masses from each plant into new pots planted with tomato seedlings.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Map of Souss region of Morocco showing the locations surveyed for RKNs.

Morphological identification

Morphological identification of the nematode population to species level was performed by using the female perineal pattern method. The females used in the perineal pattern analysis were obtained from those produced from the single egg mass culture aiming to minimize genetic variation. The root tissues were teased apart with forceps and half spear to remove adult females. The head and neck regions of the nematode were excised and the posterior part placed in a solution of 45% lactic to remove the rest body tissues. From each population, 10 mature females were randomly selected and perineal patterns were prepared and examined under a light microscope according to Eisenback et al (1981).

Molecular Identification

DNA extraction

To perform the molecular identification, DNA of each nematode population was extracted from 1 to 5 freshly hatched second stage juveniles (J2s). Nematodes were transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 25 μl double distilled water and 25 μl nematode lysis buffer (final concentration: 200 mM NaCl, 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 1% mercaptoethanol and 800 μg Proteinase K). The tubes were incubated at 65°C for 1.5 h and then at 99°C for 5 min, consecutively (Holterman et al., 2006). A total of 37 DNA extracts were obtained from the 37 nematode populations (Table 1) and were stored at −20°C until used.

Table 1.

Occurrence, distribution and control of RKN in vegetable greenhouses in Souss region of Morocco

Population code Location Host plant Crop rotation Control system Species identification
Perineal patterns Speciesspecific PCR
Bi1 Biogra Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Abamectin M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Bi2 Biogra Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Abamectin M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Bi3 Biogra Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Bi4 Biogra Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Bi5 Biogra Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K1 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. incognita (MI) MI
K2 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. incognita (MI) MI
K3 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K4 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K5 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. incognita (MI) MI
K6 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Abamectin M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K7 Khmis Ait Amira Bean Tomato-bean Fumigant nematicide M. incognita (MI) MI
K8 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K9 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K10 Khmis Ait Amira Bean Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Cadusafos M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K11 Khmis Ait Amira Bean Bean-bean - M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K12 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K13 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K14 Khmis Ait Amira zucchini Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
K15 Khmis Ait Amira Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Be1 Belfaa (INRA) Tomato Tomato-tomato Abamectin M. incognita (MI) MI
Be2 Belfaa (INRA) Tomato Tomato-tomato Abamectin M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Be3 Belfaa (INRA) Bean Bean-bean - M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Be4 Belfaa (INRA) Eggplant Bean- eggplant - M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Be5 Belfaa (INRA) Tomato Tomato-tomato - M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Be6 Belfaa Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
S1 Sidi Bibi Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
S2 Sidi Bibi Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
S3 Sidi Bibi Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
S4 Sidi Bibi Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
S5 Sidi Bibi Bean Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Ta1 Taddart Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Abamectin M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Ta2 Taddart Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Ta3 Taddart Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Ta4 Taddart Tomato Melon-tomato Fumigant nematicide M. javanica (MJ) MJ
To1 Toussous Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
To2 Toussous Tomato Tomato-tomato Fumigant nematicide + Fluopyram M. javanica (MJ) MJ
Open in a new tab

PCR with species-specific primers

Table 2 shows the primers used for DNA analysis of the root-knot nematode species. The quality of the extracted DNA was checked using universal primers developed by Ferris et al. (1993), i.e. forward primer 5′-CGT AAC AAG GTA GCT GTA G-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-TCC TCC GCT AAA TGA TAT G-3′. Amplification of the rDNA-ITS region was successful for all populations, and yielded a single band with an expected fragment size of 600 bp. All amplification reactions were performed in a final volume of 50 μl containing 23 μl ddH2O, 25 μl Dream Taq PCR Master Mix (2x) (Fermentas Life Sciences, Germany), and 1 μM of each primer. The program of the thermal cycler consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 49°C for 45 s and 72°C for 60 s with a final extension step for 8 min at 72°C. Annealing temperatures were set up at 56°C for primers Finc/Rinc, 61°C for primers Far/Rar, and 64°C for primers Fjav/Rjav. Five microliters of each PCR product was mixed with 1 μl of 6 × loading buffer (Fermentas Life Sciences) and loaded on a 1.5% standard TAE (Tris-Acetate EDTA) buffered agarose gel. After electrophoresis (100 V, 40 min) the gel was stained with ethidium bromide (1 mg/l) for 20 min, visualised and photographed under UV-light. Negative controls did not contain DNA template; positive controls were run with DNA of the target species

Table 2.

Primers used for molecular identification of root-knot nematode (Zijlstra et al., 2000)

Name of primer Species Fragment (bp) Primer sequences (5-3)
Fjav/Rjav M. javanica 670 5′-GGTGCGCGATTGAACCTATAC-3
5′-CAGGCCCTTCAGTGGAACTATAC-3′
Finc/Rinc M. incognita 1200 5′-CTCTGCCCAATGAGCTGTCC-3
5′-CTCTGCCCTCACATTACG-3
Open in a new tab

Results

Distribution of Root-knot Nematodes Species

The results of the survey indicated that root-knot nematodes were present in all surveyed provinces of Souss region (South of Morocco). Out of the 110 studied samples, 91 were found infested with root-knot nematodes.

Distribution of RKN in vegetable greenhouses in the South region of Morocco has been listed in Table 3. The population density of second stage juveniles (J2s) ranged from 59 to 121 per 100 cc soil. The highest levels of infestation were found in Biogra (121 J2 per 100 cc soil). Two species of root-knot nematodes namely M. javanica and M. incognita were identified on the basis of their perineal pattern and using species-specific primers (Table 1). Out of the 91 samples, M. javanica and M. incognita occured in 95 and 15 samples representing 86.4% and 13.5% of the total populations, respectively. M. javanica was determined as the most common and most widespread nematode species in the South region of Morocco and detected in 32 populations from 6 provinces in which tomato, bean, egg-plant and zucchini cultivars were cultivated. In Biogra, Sidi Bibi, Taddart, Toussous provinces, M. javanica was the dominant species (100%). M. incognita was detected only in two provinces (Khmis Ait Amira and Belfaa) within samples collected from tomato and bean fields only.

Table 3.

Incidence of root knot nematodes in different provinces in Souss region of Morocco

Provinces Samples analysed Nematode infected (%)
Biogra 20 18 (90)
Khmis Ait Amira 20 16 (80)
Belfaa 20 17 (85)
Sidi Bibi 18 13 (72)
Taddart 15 15 (100)
Toussous 17 11 (64.7)
Total 110 91 (82.7)
Open in a new tab

Perineal pattern identification

Microscopic examination of the perineal pattern morphology of adult females from the different populations revealed the presence of two different species, M. javanica and M. incognita. Based on the perineal pattern morphology of the of 32 populations they were classified as M. javanica. This made them easy to be separated from those of other populations with the presence of distinct lateral lines. The overall shape of these patterns was rounded and the dorsal arch was generally low. On the other hand, only 5 populations showed the typical M. incognita perineal pattern morphology, which is characterized by the presence of a high dorsal arch and wavy striae which bend towards the lateral lines and the absence of distincts lateral line incisures typical of this species.

Molecular characterization

Species-specific primers SCAR were used for molecular characterization of the different RKN populations (Table 2). Amplification of the rDNA- ITS region was successfully performed for all populations and yielded a single band with an expected fragment size of 600 pb (Ferris et al., 1993). No PCR products were obtained from the negative control lacking nematode DNA template. Using the species-specific primers, two RKNs (M. javanica and M. incognita) were identified from the 37 Meloidogyne populations (Table 1). PCR with species-specifc primers for M. javanica amplified a band of 670 bp for 32 populations (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). This means that out of 37 samples, 32 samples were molecularly identified as M. javanica. For the samples (5 populations) not identified as M. javanica, the species-specific primers for M. incognita amplified a specific band of 1200 bp (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Amplification product (670 bp) with Fjav/Rjav primers on Meloidogyne population from the Souss region of Morocco. X = 1 kp DNA ladder; T−: negative control; T+: positive control.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Amplification product (670 bp) with Fjav/Rjav primers on Meloidogyne population from the Souss region of Morocco. X = 100 bp DNA ladder; T−: negative control; T+: positive control

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Results of specific PCR for M. incognita (Be1, K7, K1, K2, K5) and M. javanica (Be4, Be5, Be6, Ta1, Ta2, Ta3, Ta4, To1, To2). X = 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega Benelux). T−: negative control; T+: positive control.

Discussion

The results of the survey demonstrated that RKNs occur in the main vegetables growing areas of Souss region in Morocco. This is similar to that fundings reported by (Bourijate, 1998; Janati et al., 1982; Mokrini, 2008) indicating the presence of the RKN on vegerables in most prospected areas of Souss region of Morocco. The results from this study showed that the RKNs are widely distributed in the 6 studied provinces with significant variations in incidence among the different provinces. The lowest incidence (64%) was obtained from Toussous (Table 3), whereas the highest incidences (100% and 90%) were detected in the provinces of Taddart and Biogra, respectively. These proportions of infestation are greater than those observed in earlier surveys from Gharb region (Mokrini, 2008) which can be attributed to environmental factors and agricultural practices. Numbers of Meloidogyne J2 detected in all surveyed locations were below the damage threshold level for RKN. In this study, the RKN are represented by two species, viz. M. javanica and M. incognita. The presence of those Meloidogyne spp. indicates that there is potential damage to vegetables crops and an appropriate management strategies should be seeked and implemented. M. javanica and M. incognita are considered very important because they cause severe damage and their wide distribution in the tropical regions (Sikora and Fernandez, 2005). M. javanica is the most prevalent species in the vegetable growing areas of Souss region. It was detected in all provinces in which tomato, bean, eggplant and zucchini are grown. This species was found in 86.4% of the total populations and was in agreement with that reported from the regions by Oualidia and Souss-Massa. Similarly, Janati et al. (1982) reported that M. javanica was the most common species in Morocco followed by M. incognita, M. arenaria and M. hapla, respectively. The relative importance of M. javanica in South of Morocco (Souss region) could be attributed to climate conditions. It has been shown that M. javanica is the predominant species in regions with a distinct dry season and if monthly precipitation of less than 5 mm in three of more successive months (Eisenback et al., 1981). In our study, M. incognita was detected only in 13% (5 populations) collected from tomato fields (4 populations) and bean crop (1 population) in Khmis Ait Amira and Belfaa provinces. However, M. arenaria and M. hapla were not detected in this study.

Molecular methods provide useful information for species separation and are essential in order to differentiate different species of Meloidogyne (Adam et al., 2007; Zijlstra et al., 2004). In addition to the morphology, species specific primers for PCR have been developed to complement the traditional identification of M. javanica (Power and Harris, 1993; Zijlstra et al., 2000; Dong et al., 2001), M. incognita (Dong et al., 2001; Meng et al., 2004; Randig et al., 2002; Tesařová et al., 2003; Zijlstra et al., 2000) and M. arenaria (Dong et al., 2001; Zijlstra et al., 2000). When using the species-specific primer developed for both M. javanica and M. incognita (Zijlstra et al., 2000) we obtained the characteristic bands of 640 and 1200 bp respectively, confirming their morphological identification. This confirms the specificity of the primer sets. The same primer set was successfully used in other researh (Garcia and Sanchez-Puerta, 2012; Mennan et al., 2011; Toumi et al., 2014; Zijlstra et al., 2000). However, Devran and Söğüt (2009) reported that the primer set (Finc/Rinc) for M. incognita developed by Zijlstra et al. (2000) did not give reproductible amplifications for the populations.

Correct identification of RKN species will lead to provide effective management strategies. As it is difficult to distinguish among all Meloidogyne species by perineal patterns alone due to the considerable variation between and within populations; for the first time we performed both morphological and molecular characterization of RKN species from Souss region of Morocco to 37 populations. This finding is a valuable ressource for future research and for developing effective control and management strategies in the region.

References

  1. Adam MAM, Philips MS, Blok VC. Molecular diagnostic key for identification of single juveniles of seven common and economically important species of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) Plant Pathol. 2007;56:19–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01455.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blok VC, Powers TO. Biochemical and molecular identification. In: Perry RN, Moens M, Starr J, editors. Root-knot nematodes. CAB International; Wallingford, UK: 2009. pp. 98–112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourijate M. Thèse de doctorat. University Ibn Zohr; Agadir, Maroc: 1998. Étude du pouvoir infectieux de Pasteuria penetrans contre Meloidogyne ssp.: Relation entre le parasitisme et la densité des populations et essai de lutte biologique; p. 69. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coyne DL, Fourie HH, Moens M. Current and future management strategies in resource-poor farming. In: Perry RN, Moens M, Starr JL, editors. Root-Knot Nematodes. CAB International; Wallingford, UK: 2009. pp. 444–475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Devran Z, Söğüt MA. Distribution and identication of root- knot nematodes from Turkey. J Nematol. 2009;41:128–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong K, Dean RA, Fortnum BA, Lewis SA. Development of PCR primers to identify species of root-knot nematodes: Meloidogyne arenaria, M. hapla, M. incognita, and M. javanica. Nematropica. 2001;31:271–280. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenback PR, Triantaphyllou HH. Root-kont nematodes: Meloidogyne species and races. In: Nickle WR, editor. Manual of Agricultural Nematology. Marcell Dekker; New York, USA: 1991. pp. 191–274. [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenback JD, Hirschmann H, Sasser JN, Triantaphyllou AC. A guide to the four most common species of root- knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), with a pictorial key. US Agency for International Development; North Carolina, USA: 1981. p. 48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Elling AA. Major emerging problems with minor Meloidogyne species. Phytopathology. 2013;103:1092–1102. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-13-0019-RVW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Esbenshade PR, Triantaphyllou AC. Isozyme Phenotypes for the Identification of Meloidogyne Species. J Nematol. 1990;22:10–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferris VR, Ferris JM, Faghihi J. Variation in spacer ribosomal DNA in some cyst-forming species of plant parasitic nematodes. Fundam Appl Nematol. 1993;16:177–184. [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia LE, Sanchez-Puerta MV. Characterization of a root-knot nematode population of Meloidogyne arenaria from Tupungato (Mendoza, Argentina) J Nematol. 2012;44:291–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartman KM, Sasser JN. Identification of Meloidogyne species on the basis of differential host test and perineal pattern morphology. In: Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN, editors. Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne. Volume II: Methodology. North Carolina State University Graphics; Raleigh, USA: 1985. pp. 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holterman M, van der Wurff A, van den Elsen S, van Megen H, Bongers T, Holovachov O, Bakker J, Helder J. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:1792–1800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunt D, Handoo Z. Taxonomy, identification and principal species. In: Perry RN, Moens M, Starr JL, editors. Root- knot nematodes. CAP International; London, UK: 2009. pp. 55–88. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hussey RS, Barker KR. Comparison of methods for collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep. 1973;57:1025–1028. [Google Scholar]
  17. Janati A, Aouragh E, Meskine M. The root-knot nematode. Meloidogyne spp. Third IMP Res. Plan. Conf. Root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne spp.; Coimbria, Portugal. 1982. pp. 85–93. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones TJ, Haegeman A, Danchin EG, Gaur HS, Helder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla-Lopez R, Palomares- Rius JE, Wesemael WML, Perry RN. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;14:946–961. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karuri HW, Olago D, Neilon R, Mararo E, Villinger J. A survey of root-knot nematodes and resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in sweet potato varieties from Kenyan fields. Crop Prot. 2017;92:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.10.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaskavalci G. Effect of soil solarization and organic amendments treatment for controlling Meloidogyne incognita in tomato cultivars in Western Anatolia. Turk J Agric For. 2007;31:159–167. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meng Q, Long H, Xu J. PCR assays for rapid and sensitive identification of three major root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria. Acta Phytopathol Sinica. 2004;34:204–210. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mennan S, Aydinli G, Kati T. First report of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria) infecting parsley in Turkey. J Phytopathol. 2011;159:694–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2011.01820.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Merimi Z. Thèse de 3eme cycle pour l’obtention du diplôme d’ingénieur d’état. Agadir, Maroc: 1987. Détermination des espèces de nématodes à galles (Meloidogyne spp.) dans la région de Souss-Massa; p. 71. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mokrini F. Rapport de titularisation au sein de l’INRA. Kénitra, Maroc: 2008. Les nématodes associés aux différentes cultures au Maroc; p. 54. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mokrini F. Les nématodes de la tomate dans le Souss-Massa. Agriculture du Maghreb. 2016;93:54–57. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ornat C, Sorribas FJ. Integrated management of root-knot nematodes in Mediterranean horticultural crops. In: Ciancio A, Mukerji KG, editors. Integrated Management and Biocontrol of Vegetable and Grain Crops Nematodes. Springer; Dordrecht, Netherlands: 2008. pp. 295–320. [Google Scholar]
  27. Powers TO. Nematode molecular diagnostics: From bands to barcodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:367–383. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Powers TO, Harris TS. A polymerase chain reaction method for identification of five major Meloidogyne spp. J Nematol. 1993;25:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Powers TO, Todd TC, Burnell AM, Murray PCB, Fleming CC, Szalanski AL, Adams BA, Harris TS. The rDNA internal transcribed spacer region as a taxonomic marker for nematodes. J Nematol. 1997;29:441–450. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Randig O, Bongiovanni M, Carneiro RM, Castagnone-Sereno P. Genetic diversity of root-knot nematodes from Brazil and development of SCAR marker specific for the coffee damaging species. Genome. 2002;45:862–870. doi: 10.1139/g02-054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser JN, Carter CC. Overview of international Meloidogyne Project 1975–1984. In: Sasser JN, Carter CC, editors. An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne. Vol. 1: Biology and control. State University Graphics; Raleigh, USA: 1985. pp. 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sikora RA, Fernandez E. Nematode parasites of vegetables. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J, editors. Plant-parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 2005. pp. 319–392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tesařová B, Zouhar M, Ryšánek P. Development of PCR for specific determination of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Protect Sci. 2003;39:23–28. doi: 10.17221/3823-PPS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tigano M, De Siqueira K, Castagnono-Sereno P, Mulet K, Queiroz P, Dos Santos M, Teixeira C, Almeida M, Silva J, Carneiro R. Genetic diversity of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii and development of a SCAR marker for this guava-damaging species. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:1054–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02350.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Toumi F, Waeyenberge L, Yousef R, Khalil H, Al-Assas K, Moens M. Distribution of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne spp., in tomato greenhouses at Lattakia and Tartus Province in Syria. Pak J Nematol. 2014;32:163–172. [Google Scholar]
  36. Verdejo-Lucas S, Sorribas J, Puigdomenech P. Yield losses caused by Meloidogyne javanica on lettuce and tomato in a plastic house. Invest Agrar Prod Prot Veg Suppl. 1994;2:395–400. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zijlstra C, Donkers-Venne DTHM, Fargette M. Identification of Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria using sequence characterised amplified region (SCAR) based PCR assays. Nematology. 2000;2:847–853. doi: 10.1163/156854100750112798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zijlstra C, Van Hoof R, Donkers-Venne D. A PCR test to detect the cereal root-knot nematode Meloidogyne naasi. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2004;110:855–860. doi: 10.1007/s10658-004-2492-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Pathology Journal are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Plant Pathology

RESOURCES