Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Jun 14;20:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.009

Data set on professional attraction and entrepreneurial intention of students in a selected Nigerian University

A Omotayo Osibanjo a, Maxwell Olokundun a,, Ovidiu Bordean b, Anthonia Adeniji a, Salau Odunayo a, Stephen Ibidunni a
PMCID: PMC6098193  PMID: 30128336

Abstract

This article presents data on the effect of professional attraction to entrepreneurship and the development of entrepreneurial intentions by university students using Covenant University in Nigeria as the case study. The study employed a descriptive quantitative research design by means of survey method. The population of the study comprised all students in the selected university with a total of 7988 students. A sample size of 400 students was selected. Reliability and validity measures were established. Data was analyzed employing Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Regression analysis was used as statistical tool of analysis. The analyzed field data set is presented in this article.

Keywords: Professional attraction, Entrepreneurial intention, University students Nigeria


Specification Table

Subject area Business, Management
More Specific Subject Area Human Resource Management, Entrepreneurship
Type of Data Table
How Data was Acquired Customer researcher questionnaire
Data format Raw, analyzed, Inferential statistical data
Experimental Factors Sample consisted of university students. The researcher-made questionnaire which contained data on professional attraction and entrepreneurial intention of university were completed.
Experimental features Professional attraction is an important component of entrepreneurial development of students in universities
Data source location South west Nigeria
Data Accessibility Data is included in this article

Value of data

  • These data present information on professional attraction as it relates to entrepreneurial intentions of students in the university context. This is important considering that professional attraction to a career in entrepreneurship reinforces the propensity for development of entrepreneurial intentions.

  • The data set showed that fostering professional attraction for entrepreneurship in universities has implications for job creation potentials by university students.

  • The data set can motivate the identification of relevant professional attraction indices required to stimulate the development of entrepreneurial intentions by university students.

1. Data

The data comprised inferential statistical data on professional attraction and entrepreneurial intentions of students of covenant university Nigeria. Professional attraction in this context refers to the extent to which students hold a positive or negative assessment of engaging in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial intention also refers to the efforts of a student in carrying out entrepreneurial behavior. Specifically, regression analysis was employed to test the hypothesis proposed. Table 1 shows the model summary of the analysis based on the hypothesis tested. The analysis revealed that professional attraction explained 34.6% variance in entrepreneurial intention (R2=0.346, p<0.05). Showing that the more university students are attracted to entrepreneurship as a career the greater the propensity to engage in efforts towards carrying out entrepreneurial behavior while in school.

Table 1.

Model summary.

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard error of the estimate
1 0.589a 0.346 0.343 0.97729
a

Predictors: (Constant), Professional attraction.

Source: Field Survey, 2017.

H01: Professional attraction does not affect entrepreneurial intention.

Table 2 shows Analysis of Variance. Table showing the statistical significance of the results gotten. The Analysis of Variance table relates the variance of the residuals from the regression model to the variance of the original data. The model showed the effect of professional attraction on entrepreneurial intention. The F-value is calculated as the Mean Square Regression (98.196) divided by the Mean Square Residual (0.955), yielding F=102.812. From this result, the model in the table is statistically significant (Sig=0.000).

Table 2.

Analysis of variancea.

Model Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean square F Significance
1 Regression 98.196 1 98.196 102.812 0.000b
Residual 185.289 194 0.955
Total 283.485 195
a

Dependent variable: Entrepreneurial intention.

b

Predictors: (Constant), Professional attraction.

Source: Field Survey, 2017.

Table 3 shows regression coefficients. The regression coefficient offers information on the predictable variation in the dependent variable based on a one-unit increase in the independent variable. Based on the results the table below revealed the contributions of professional attraction on entrepreneurial intention and the levels of significance. (Professional attraction; β=0.589; t=10.140; p<0.05).

Table 3.

Coefficientsa.

Model Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
T Significance 95.0% confidence interval for B
B Standard Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 1.217 0.331 3.672 .000 0.563 1.870
Professional attraction 0.596 0.059 0.589 10.140 .000 0.480 0.712
a

Dependent variable: Entrepreneurial intention.

Source: Field Survey, 2017.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

The data presented a quantitative research based on a descriptive research design to assess the effect of professional attraction on entrepreneurial intentions of university students [1], [2], [6]. Survey method was deemed suitable for data collection. Covenant University was selected from South west Nigeria [3]. The study population included all students of Covenant University, which has a population of 7898 students. A randomly chosen set of 400 students participated in this research. The sample size was derived using the Ref. [1] formula. According to Ref. [1], the sample size for a research study can be determined through the following presentation:

From the estimation, a population of 7898 students at alpha value of 0.05 will produce a sample size of 367 respondents. Hence, 400 respondents were used to make room for lost copies of questionnaire or the ones that are not well completed. Data were collected from students across the various colleges in the selected university using a customized researcher- made questionnaire [4], [5]. The data was coded and inputted in SPSS version 25. Data was analyzed employing inferential statistical tests involving regression analysis (Table 4).

Table 4.

Determination of sample size.

Populationsize Sample size
Continuous data Categorical data
(margin of error=0.03)
(margin of error=0.05)
alpha=0.10 alpha=0.05 alpha=0.01 p=0.50 p=0.50 p=0.50
t=1.65 t=1.96 t=2.58 t=1.65 t=1.96 t=2.58
100 46 55 68 74 80 87
200 59 75 102 116 132 154
300 65 85 123 143 169 207
400 69 92 137 162 196 250
500 72 96 147 176 218 286
600 73 100 155 187 235 316
700 75 102 161 196 249 341
800 76 104 166 203 260 363
900 76 105 170 209 270 382
1000 77 106 173 213 278 399
1500 79 110 183 230 306 461
2000 83 112 189 239 323 499
4000 83 119 198 254 351 570
6000 83 119 209 259 362 598
8000 83 119 209 262 367 613
10,000 83 119 209 264 370 623

Source: [1].

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to recognize the management of Covenant University for fully sponsoring this research work.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.009.

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.009.

Contributor Information

A. Omotayo Osibanjo, Email: ade.osibanjo@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.

Maxwell Olokundun, Email: maxwell.olokundun@covenantuniversity.edu.ng, ayomax@yahoo.com.

Ovidiu Bordean, Email: ovidiu.bordean@econ.ubbcluj.ro.

Anthonia Adeniji, Email: anthonia.adeniji@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.

Salau Odunayo, Email: salau.odunayo@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.

Stephen Ibidunni, Email: anthonia.adeniji@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (13.4KB, docx)

.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc2.zip (4.1KB, zip)

.

References

  • 1.Bartlett J.E., Kotrlik J.W., Higgins C.C. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 2001;19(1):43–50. (Spring) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olokundun M.A., Ibidunni A.S., Peter F., Amaihian A.B., Ogbari M. Entrepreneurship educator׳s competence on university students׳ commitment to learning and business plan writing. Acad. Strat. Manag. J. 2017;16(2):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Osibanjo O.A., Salau O.P., Falola H.O., Oyewunmi A.E. Workplace stress: implications for organizational performance in a Nigerian Public University. Bus. Theory Prac. 2016;17(3):261–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Olokundun M.A., Ibidunni A.S., Peter F., Amaihian A., Moses C.L., Iyiola O.O. Experiential pedagogy and shared vision: a focus on identification of business opportunities by Nigerian University Students. J. Entrep. Educ. 2017;20(2):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ibidunni O.S., Osibanjo A.O., Adeniji A.A., Salau O.P., Falola H.O. Talent retention and organizational performance: a competitive positioning in Nigerian Banking Sector. Period. Polytech. Soc. Manag. Sci. 2016;24(1):1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moses C.L., Olokundun M.A., Akinbode M., Agboola M., Inelo F. Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: the moderating role of passion. Soc. Sci. 2016;11:645–653. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (13.4KB, docx)

Supplementary material

mmc2.zip (4.1KB, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES