Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2018 Jul 11;55(9):3840–3844. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3291-y

Evaluation of Mentha arvensis essential oil and its major constituents for fungitoxicity

Manpreet Kaur Makkar 1, Sunita Sharma 2,, Harleen Kaur 2
PMCID: PMC6098792  PMID: 30150845

Abstract

Essential oil and major constituents of menthe were evaluated for fungicidal activities. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) of essential oil from leaves of Mentha arvensis cv. CIM-Saryu revealed that menthol was found in highest amount (77.94%) followed by isomenthone (5.24%), neomenthyl acetate (5.18%) and menthone (5.00%). Menthol and menthone were extracted from the essential oil by column chromatography. Essential oil, menthol and menthone were screened for their fungicidal activity against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium moniliforme. Menthol was highly effective as compared to essential oil as well as menthone. All of them exhibited less activity than standard bavistin at all the tested concentrations.

Keywords: Mentha, Essential oil, Menthol, Menthone, Fungitoxicity and ED50

Introduction

The cultivation of aromatic plants to obtain essential oils has been greatly increased mainly due to the increasing demand generated by food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries (Lubbe and Verpoorte 2011). Among many aromatic species, production of menthol mint has a great economic importance because of its large number of applications in different sectors of pharmaceutical industry (Souza et al. 2014).

Mints comprise a group of species of the genus Mentha belonging to the family Lamiaceae. Mentha species are generally found in circumboreal distribution and are native to the temperate regions of western and central Asia, Europe and North America (Aflatuni et al. 2005). The world market for menthol mint essential oils is 20,000 tons per year. In India, about 145,000 hectares of menthol mint are now cultivated (Srivastava et al. 2002).

There are several methods by which constituents of Mentha could be extracted. On distillation, the aerial parts of this plant yield essential oil having a variety of compounds in varying amounts such as menthol, menthone, menthyl acetate, menthofuran, carvone, linalool, linalyl acetate and piperitone oxide which are used in pharmaceutical, flavor, food, cosmetic, beverage and allied industries (Verma et al. 2009). In hydro distillation method the material is completely immersed in water and then boiled. In this procedure the surrounding water act as a barrier in preventing the material from overheating. Upon cooling, the water and the essential oil separate in the collector (Gill et al. 2014).

The pathogenic fungi are microorganisms that cause economic damage directly in the agricultural production system, besides indirectly cause ecological problems, due to the use of pesticides for its control (Kimati et al. 1997). Use of synthetic fungicides to control the disease causes several adverse effects i.e. development of resistance in the pathogen, residual toxicity, pollution in the environment, high cost etc. Therefore, it has become necessary to adopt ecofriendly approaches for better crop health and for yield. Plant essential oils are potential source of antimicrobial compound of natural origin. Mentha oil is also reported to possesss a wide spectrum of herbicidal (Vaughn and Spencer 1993), antifungal (Samber et al. 2014), antibacterial (Padmini et al. 2010), antioxidant (Derwich et al. 2011), antimicrobial (Iscan et al. 2002) and insecticidal activities (Bosly 2013).

Hence, the objective of this work was to evaluate the essential oil production and quality extracted by hydrodistillation of leaves as well as to evaluate the antifungal potential of menthol mint essential oil and some isolated substances of this oil i.e. menthol and menthone, on the fungi Fusarium moniliforme and Rhizoctonia solani, searching for alternatives to synthetic fungicides in the treatment of commercial seeds.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The plant material was grown in the Herbal Garden, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The crop was raised by following Package of Practices, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana in triplicates using Randomised Block Design. The samples grown were harvested on June 25, 2015. The stems and leaves were separated, dried in ambient conditions and then in hot air oven at 40 °C to obtain constant weight and were stored in air tight glass containers for further analysis.

Essential oil extraction

The leaves and stems were ground in electric grinder and were used for the extraction of essential oil by hydro distillation method. The yields (%) of extracted essential oil of stems and leaves were compared.

Hydro distillation method

Extraction of essential oil was done by hydro distillation using Clevenger-type apparatus. Leaves or stems (100 gm) of Mentha arvensis were taken in 1 l round bottomed flask and 700 ml of water was added to it. The contents were thoroughly mixed and flask was kept overnight at room temperature. The flask was placed in heating mantle and was fitted with Clevenger-type apparatus. The contents were refluxed for 10 h (until no more oil was obtained). The essential oil (upper layer) containing little water was collected separately in conical flask. Same procedure was repeated to process 20 batches to get essential oil in high yields. Essential oil layers were collected in a conical flask.

Partitioning of essential oil layer

Essential oil layer obtained by hydro distillation was transferred into 250 ml separatory funnel. Essential oil was partitioned thrice using diethyl ether (100, 50 and 50 ml). The diethyl layer (upper layer) containing oil was passed over anhydrous sodium sulphate to remove traces of water present if any. Diethyl ether was distilled off and the oil was stored at 4 °C in dark glass bottles for further analysis. The yield (%) of essential oil obtained was calculated as:

Yield%=WeightofessentialoilextractedgWeightofsampletakeng×100

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry of essential oil of Mentha leaf

Extracted essential oil of Mentha leaves was analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (QP2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with an Rtx-5 MS capillary column (30.0 m × 0.20.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness) for the separation of the components. The injector was maintained at 260 °C and operated in split injection mode with the split valve closed for 1 min. Helium gas was used as the carrier gas at a constant pressure of 69 kPa. The column oven was initially maintained at 50 °C for 2 min, raised to 210 °C at 3 °C/min, then to 280 °C at 10 °C/min. The interface temperature was 270 °C and the ionization mode was electron impact (70 eV). The mass selective detector was operated in the scan mode between 40 and 600 m/z. Data acquisition was started 3.0 min after injection. MS parameters used were; ionization voltage (EI) 70 eV, peak width 2 s, mass range 40–650 amu and detector voltage 1.5 V. The percentage of components in the essential oil was calculated from the relative area of each peak analyzed by flame ionization detector. Peak identification was carried out by comparison of the mass spectra with mass spectra data available of NIST08, WILEY8, Perfumery and Flavor and Fragrance libraries. The composition of Mentha oil is tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1.

GC–MS data of Mentha leaf essential oil

Sr. No. Name Retention time Percent area
1 3-Hexen-1-ol 6.095 0.08
2 2-Propen-1-one 7.405 0.02
3 β-Pinene 10.570 0.04
4 Isopulegol 11.452 0.23
5 Limonene 12.869 0.28
6 Eucalyptol 12.958 0.05
7 1-Phenyloxirane 13.524 0.05
8 2-Furanmethanol 14.893 0.03
9 Linalool oxide 15.627 0.03
10 Linalool 16.221 0.11
11 Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 17.189 0.06
12 Isopulegol 18.376 0.82
13 Isomenthone 18.826 5.24
14 Menthone 19.293 5.00
15 Menthol 20.533 77.94
16 α-terpeniol 20.864 0.37
17 Cyclopentanone 21.245 0.10
18 Hexanoic acid 21.740 0.08
19 Pulegone 22.842 0.59
20 Piperitone 23.547 1.32
21 Menthyl acetate 24.448 0.10
22 Cyclopentanone 25.003 0.05
23 Neomenthyl acetate 25.375 5.18
24 Isomenthyl acetate 25.930 0.12
25 Isopulegol acetate 26.118 0.09
26 Eugenol 28.093 0.18
27 β-Bourbonene 29.271 0.14
28 Caryophyllene 30.756 0.52
29 Germacrene 33.338 0.72
30 Bicyclogermacrene 33.965 0.14
31 Cadinene 35.045 0.11
32 Nerolidol 36.622 0.07
33 Spathulenol 37.208 0.11
34 Cadin-4-en-10-ol 40.157 0.04

Isolation of menthol and menthone from essential oil by column chromatography

Essential oil from leaves of M. arvensis (10 g) was subjected to column chromatography to extract menthol and menthone. Column was packed with silica gel (600 g) for column chromatography with 60–120 mesh size activated at 110 °C for 1 h. Essential oil was dissolved in n-hexane (boiling point—68 °C) and then adsorbed on silica gel for 30 min. Column was eluted with hexane and polarity was increased using dichloromethane. Each fraction was monitored using thin layer chromatography and isolation of pure products was confirmed by IR and 1H NMR analysis.

Antifungal activity

Essential oil, menthol and menthone were analysed for their antifungal activity. Two fungi were selected for bioassay viz. Fusarium moniliforme and R. solani. A culture of the test fungi was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for certain period (generally 7 days) at ambient temperature (25 ± 1 °C) for growth. Stock solution (1000 μg/ml) of test compounds was prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and further dilutions were done (500, 250, 100 and 50 μg/ml) and stored at 4 °C for further use. Potato Dextrose Agar media, containing specific concentration of the test compound was poured on to the Petri plates. After solidification, small disc (0.5 cm dia.) of the fungus culture was cut with a sterile cork borer and transferred aseptically upside down in the centre of Petri plate. Petri plates were incubated in BOD incubator at 25 ± 1 °C. Growth of fungal colony was measured after every 24 h till the fungus in the control plates (containing dimethyl sulfoxide) completely occupied it. Three replications were maintained for each treatment. The percentage growth inhibition over control was calculated as

I=100(C-T)C

where I = inhibition percentage, C = growth in control, T = growth in treatment.

Results and discussion

Essential oil yields

Essential oil was yellow in color with a very strong and persistent odour of mint. Our results showed that in leaves essential oil content was 3.02% whereas it was absent in stems. The yield of essential oils reported in the literature of some species of the genus Mentha varied from 0.05 to 1.60% (Bhat et al. 2002).

GC–MS analysis

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) of oil exhibited the presence of 34 compounds accounting for 100.0% of oil. Menthol (77.94%) was the major compound and the other minor compounds present were isomenthone (5.24%), neomenthyl acetate (5.18%), menthone (5.00%) and piperitone (1.32%). Table 1 tabulates the retention time and percent area of compounds present in Mentha essential oil. Souza et al. (2014) reported menthol (70.00%) as the main component of menthol mint essential oil followed by menthyl acetate (7.00–12.00%) which is an indicator of maturity. A total of 12 compounds were reported including menthol, pulegone and piperitone. Padalia et al. (2013) analysed the oil from 9 cultivars of M. arvensis and reported 33 constituents were menthol (73.70–85.80%), menthone (1.50–11.00%), menthyl acetate (0.50–5.30%), isomenthone (2.10–3.90%), limonene (1.20–3.30%) and neomenthol (1.90–2.50%). All the cultivars were rich in menthol and the highest menthol content was found in MAS-1 (85.50%) followed by Kosi (78.70%), Shivalik (78.10%) and Damroo (78.00%). The menthone content varied between 1.50 and 11.00%.

Isolation of menthol and menthone

Essential oil from leaves of M. arvensis (10 g) was subjected to column chromatography to extract menthol and menthone. Column was packed with silica gel (600 g) eluted with hexane and polarity was increased using dichloromethane. The hexane fraction showed two spots on TLC. On increasing the polarity with dichloromethane, hexane: dichloromethane (4:1), a pale yellowish liquid (0.51 g), showing single spot on TLC having boiling point 220 °C, refractive index 1.453 and density of 0.892 g/cm3 was obtained and identified as menthone. Further its confirmation was done from its IR and 1H NMR data.

On further increasing the polarity with dichloromethane, hexane: dichloromethane (1:1), a white crystalline compound (6.80 g), having melting point 42–43 °C which showed single spot on TLC (Rf value 0.54) was obtained. IR and 1H NMR data proved this compound to be menthol.

Antifungal activity

Essential oil, menthol and menthone were tested for their in vitro fungicidal activity against F. moniliforme and R. solani. The percent inhibition of the compounds against F. moniliforme and R. solani is presented in Figs. 1 and 2 respectively along with ED50 values in Table 2. Bavistin was used as standard and Dimethylsulfoxide as control against both the test fungi. The result showed that menthol was found most promising against both the pathogenic fungi and showed better activity as compared to the oil. Essential oil showed 100% inhibition of both the fungal species at concentration of 1000 µg/ml with ED50 of 495 µg/ml and 331 µg/ml for F. moniliforme and R. solani respectively. Menthol was 100% effective against R. solani at 500 µg/ml and 1000 µg/ml with ED50 value of 189 µg/ml whereas it showed 100% inhibition of F. moniliforme at 1000 µg/ml only with ED50 value of 462 µg/ml. Menthone was found to be least effective against both the fungal species. ED50 value for menthone was more than 1000 µg/ml hence not reported. However, none of the compounds showed better control than standard bavistin against both the tested fungi.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Comparison of antifungal activity of essential oil and its major compounds against Fusarium moniliforme

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of antifungal activity of essential oil and its major compounds against Rhizoctonia solani

Table 2.

ED50 (µg/ml) of essential oil, menthol and menthone along with the standard bavistin

ED50 (µg/ml)
Fusarium moniliforme Rhizoctonia solani
Essential oil 495 331
Menthol 462 189
Menthone > 1000 > 1000
Bavistin 8 5

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Amandeep Singh Brar, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana for providing the plant material. We are also thankful to Panjab University, Chandigarh for providing IR and 1H NMR spectral data of isolated compounds and Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi for providing GC–MS data.

References

  1. Aflatuni A, Uusitalo J, Ek S, Hohtola A. Variation in the amount of yield and in the extract composition between conventionally produced and micropropagated peppermint and spearmint. J Essent Oil Res. 2005;17:66–70. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2005.9698833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhat S, Maheshwari P, Kumar S, Kumar A. Mentha species: in vitro regeneration and genetic transformation. Mol Biol Today. 2002;3:11–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosly HA. Evaluation of insecticidal activities of Mentha piperita and Lavandula angustifolia essential oils against house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) J Entomol Nematol. 2013;5:50–54. doi: 10.5897/JEN2013.0073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Derwich E, Chabir R, Taouil R, Senhaji O. In-vitro antioxidant activity and GC/MS studies on the leaves of Mentha piperita (Lamiaceae) from Morocco. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res. 2011;3:130–136. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gill K, Gupta R, Bhise S, Bansal M, Gill G. Effect of hydro distillation process on extraction time and oil recovery at various moisture contents from Mentha leaves. Int J Eng Sci. 2014;4:08–12. [Google Scholar]
  6. Iscan G, Kirimer N, Kurkcuoglu M, Baser KHC, Demirci F. Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3943–3946. doi: 10.1021/jf011476k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimati H, Amorin L, Bergamin Filho A, Camargo LEAR. Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças Das Plantas Cultivadas. 3. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres LTDA; 1997. p. 774. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lubbe A, Verpoorte R. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants for specialty industrial materials. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;34:785–801. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Padalia RC, Verma RS, Chauhan A, Sunderesan V, Chanotiya CS. Essential oil composition of sixteen elite cultivars of Mentha from western Himalayan region, India. Maejo Int J Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):83–93. [Google Scholar]
  10. Padmini E, Valarmathi A, Rani MU. Comparative analysis of chemical composition and antibacterial activities of Mentha spicata and Camellia sinensis. Asian J Exp Biol. 2010;1:7727–7781. [Google Scholar]
  11. Samber N, Varma A, Manzoor N. Evaluation of Mentha piperita essential oil and its major constituents for antifungal activity in Candida spp. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2014;3:9404–9410. [Google Scholar]
  12. Souza AA, Lemos MJ, Brito DMC, Fernandis MS, Castro RN, Souza SR. Production and quality of menthol mint essential oil and antifungal and antigerminative activity. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5(1):3311–3318. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.521346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Srivastava RK, Singh AK, Kalra A, Tomar VKS, Bansal RP, Patra DD, Chand S, Naqvi AA, Sharma S, Kumar S. Characteristics of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) cultivated on industrial scale in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Ind Crops Prod. 2002;15:189–198. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00113-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vaughn SF, Spencer GF. Volatile monoterpenes as potential parent structures for new herbicides. Weed Sci. 1993;41:114–119. [Google Scholar]
  15. Verma K, Pandeya SN, Singh UK, Gupta S, Prashant P, Anurag Bhardwaj G. Synthesis and pharmacological activity of some substituted menthone semicarbazone and thiosemicarbazone. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol. 2009;1:357–366. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES