Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2017 Nov 30;96(4):e538–e539. doi: 10.1111/aos.13644

Preferential atrophy of the central retinal ganglion cells in homonymous hemianopia due to acquired retrogeniculate lesions demonstrated using swept‐source optical coherence tomography

Tsutomu Yamashita 1,2, Atsushi Miki 1,2,, Katsutoshi Goto 2, Syunsuke Araki 2, Go Takizawa 2, Yoshiaki Ieki 2, Junichi Kiryu 2, Akio Tabuchi 1, Yasuyuki Iguchi 3, Kazumi Kimura 4, Yoshiki Yagita 5
PMCID: PMC6099321  PMID: 29193786

Editor,

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies of acquired occipital lobe lesions in humans have demonstrated corresponding inner retinal thinning with the use of time‐domain OCT (TD‐OCT) (Jindahra et al. 2009), and later, with the use of spectral domain OCT (SD‐OCT) (Yamashita et al. 2012). In the present study, we analysed the whole macular area in eyes with homonymous hemianopia by high‐penetration swept‐source OCT (SS‐OCT; DRI OCT‐1 Atlantis, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and produced maps of the three macular inner retinal layer thicknesses (μm): (i) the macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL), (ii) the ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) and (iii) the ganglion cell complex (GCC; mRNFL + GCL + IPL) thicknesses. The software program calculates the average retinal thickness of the mRNFL, GCL + IPL, GCC and the total for each 2 × 1.5 mm grid square of the 12 × 9 mm scan area. The macular retinal thickness parameters (centred on the macula) were divided vertically into the hemianopic and unaffected sides, and the averaged data between the two eyes were used for further quantitative analyses.

We examined 19 patients [male, n = 9; female, n = 10; age, 38–78 years (mean 60.5 years)] with unilateral retrogeniculate lesions and 56 age‐matched normal control subjects [male, n = 30; female, n = 26; age, 20–82 years (mean, 56.2 years)]. The time between the SS‐OCT measurement and the onset of brain lesions ranged from 1 month to 8.0 years (mean, 3.2 years). The age, sex and refraction values of the patients and the normal control subjects did not differ to a statistically significant extent (p = 0.3834, 0.7913 and 0.8657, respectively; age and refraction: unpaired Mann–Whitney U‐test; sex: chi‐squared test). In the eyes with homonymous hemianopia, each of these thicknesses of the hemianopic side was significantly thinner in comparison to normal eyes (Table 1). The macular inner retinal thicknesses on the hemianopic side of the central 2 × 3 mm area were significantly thinner than those in the unaffected sides (Table 1). A regression analysis revealed a negative linear relationship (linear regression, R 2 = 0.605, p = 0.001) between the time after stroke and the GCL + IPL thickness on the hemianopic side of the central 2 × 3 mm area. The GCL + IPL and GCC thicknesses of the wide angle 6 × 9 mm area on the hemianopic side of the patients with stroke were significantly thinner than those in normal subjects and those on the unaffected side (Table 1). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the central 2 × 3 mm area GCL + IPL and the GCC thickness for discriminating between the brain lesion group and the normal control group were significantly greater than those in the wide angle 6 × 9 mm area (Table 2).

Table 1.

The macular thickness parameters in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal controls, as measured by swept‐source optical coherence tomography (SS‐OCT) instruments (μm, Mean ± SD)

2 × 3 mm area 6 × 9 mm area 2 × 3 mm area 6 × 9 mm area
Hemianopic side of hemianopes Unaffected side of hemianopes Normal controls Hemianopic side of hemianopes Unaffected side of hemianopes Normal controls p valuea p valueb p valuea p valueb
mRNFL 24.3 ± 6.2 25.8 ± 4.2 28.5 ± 5.3 41.8 ± 9.4 42.2 ± 9.6 48.6 ± 33.3 0.0313 0.0018 0.2954 0.0042
GCL + IPL 63.7 ± 9.5 73.1 ± 7.9 82.8 ± 5.6 43.6 ± 2.7 45.0 ± 3.0 49.2 ± 15.6 0.0002 0.0001 0.0010 0.0001
GCC 86.9 ± 13.7 99.0 ± 11.4 111.4 ± 8.4 85.3 ± 10.0 87.1 ± 11.0 97.8 ± 32.3 0.0002 0.0001 0.0141 0.0001
Total 265.5 ± 13.7 273.2 ± 12.2 293.0 ± 14.6 222.9 ± 9.7 226.2 ± 14.6 240.5 ± 41.4 0.0010 0.0001 0.0872 0.0001

GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer.

a

Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side and the unaffected side (Wilcoxon signed‐ranks test).

b

Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal eyes (Mann–Whitney U‐test).

Table 2.

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis using the SS‐OCT‐based measurement of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia

AUC (standard error) p valuea
2 × 3 mm area 6 × 9 mm area
mRNFL 0.734 (0.082) 0.720 (0.073) 0.8407
GCL + IPL 0.981 (0.013) 0.912 (0.034) 0.0132
GCC 0.982 (0.012) 0.876 (0.049) 0.0242
Total 0.945 (0.024) 0.902 (0.046) 0.2818

GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer.

a

Comparison of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in the 2 × 3 mm and 6 × 9 mm areas.

Our results using SS‐OCT confirmed the observations of the previous studies using TD‐OCT and SD‐OCT, in that the inner retina showed statistically significant thinning corresponding to the affected visual hemifields in patients with acquired retrogeniculate damage. In addition, an area analysis revealed that the thinning predominantly occurred in the most central retina, close to the fovea. The latter finding is consistent with the results of experimental studies in primates, in which the selective loss of small ganglion cells projecting to the parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus was observed after occipital lobe ablation (Weller et al. 1979; Cowey et al. 1989; Weller & Kaas 1989; Johnson & Cowey 2000). The similarity between animal experiments and human studies suggests that the retinal thinning of the OCT is—at least in part—due to trans‐synaptic retrograde degeneration.

References

  1. Cowey A, Stoerig P & Perry VH (1989): Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells after damage to striate cortex in macaque monkeys: selective loss of P beta cells. Neuroscience 29: 65–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jindahra P, Petrie A & Plant GT (2009): Retrograde trans‐synaptic retinal ganglion cell loss identified by optical coherence tomography. Brain 132: 628–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson H & Cowey A (2000): Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells following restricted lesions of striate cortex in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 132: 269–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Weller RE & Kaas JH (1989): Parameters affecting the loss of ganglion cells of the retina following ablations of striate cortex in primates. Vis Neurosci 3: 327–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weller RE, Kaas JH & Wetzel AB (1979): Evidence for the loss of X‐cells of the retina after long‐term ablation of visual cortex in monkeys. Brain Res 160: 134–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yamashita T, Miki A, Iguchi Y, Kimura K, Maeda F & Kiryu J (2012): Reduced retinal ganglion cell complex thickness in patients with posterior cerebral artery infarction detected using spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 56: 502–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Ophthalmologica are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES