Metformin added to bosentan therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart defects: a pilot study

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a common complication of a congenital heart defect (CHD). Recent studies suggest metformin may be a potential drug to improve cardiac function in PAH. A pilot study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of short-term treatment with a combination regimen consisting of bosentan and metformin in PAH-CHD patients as compared with bosentan monotherapy in a prospective, randomised study.

Patients with PAH-CHD were randomised to receive bosentan (initially at 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and then 125 mg twice daily) for 3 months with or without the combination treatment of metformin (500 mg twice daily).

93 patients were enrolled to bosentan monotherapy (n=48) or bosentan/metformin combination treatment (n=45). After 3 months, both treatments significantly improved World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and right heart haemodynamic parameters. The improvements in 6MWD and pulmonary vascular resistance index were significantly greater in patients treated with combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (mean±sd 95±136 versus 48±119 m (p=0.017) and −1.8±1.2 versus −1.2±1.3 Wood units per m² (p<0.001), respectively). Pulmonary endothelin (EDN)1 was significantly decreased after combination therapy (p=0.006). However, plasma EDN1 levels were not affected.

Combination therapy with bosentan and metformin in PAH-CHD patients provides improvements in important outcomes such as exercise capacity and pulmonary haemodynamics, compared with bosentan alone.

Short abstract

This study investigated, for the first time, the efficacy of a combination regimen consisting of bosentan and metformin in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart defect as compared with bosentan monotherapy http://ow.ly/n4nJ30kT98d

Introduction

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a common complication of a congenital heart defect (CHD), and leads to significant morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. PAH-CHD develops as a result of increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) due to chronic volume and pressure overload of the pulmonary circulation, mainly in patients diagnosed late or in patients who did not have access to cardiovascular care and surgical management as infants, particularly in developing countries [3]. Currently, there are no curative treatments for PAH-CHD other than heart–lung transplantation, which has been limited by the shortage of organ donors and long waiting times. Therefore, management focuses on slowing down the progress of the PAH and improving quality of life and heart function before transplantation proceeds.

The pathogenesis of PAH-CHD is complex and involves multiple biochemical signalling pathways including the endothelin (EDN), nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways. Therefore, combining drugs that target more than one of these pathways may offer additional benefits over endothelin receptor antagonist (e.g. bosentan) monotherapy. While bosentan may help to prevent World Health Organization (WHO)/New York Heart Association functional class deterioration, such as by reducing dyspnoea and improving cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables, there is little evidence to demonstrate it improves mortality outcomes [4–6]. Metformin is a well-known blood glucose-lowering drug for type 2 diabetes that has been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risks in those patients [7] and, in experimental studies, has shown promise in improving function in PAH models [8, 9].

Previous studies suggest the cardiovascular protective effects of metformin may not be solely attributed to its anti-hyperglycaemic properties and may involve its actions on improving lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) functions [10, 11]. There is also evidence that it can attenuate cardiac fibrosis and retard cardiac hypertrophy during hypertensive stress [12, 13]. At a cellular level, it is noted that metformin may improve mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis in myocardial cells [14]. The positive effects of metformin on vascular reactivity have been demonstrated in normoinsulinaemic patients [15] and in response to vasodilator agents in diabetic rats [16]. Interestingly, metformin has been shown to reverse the development of experimental PAH [8, 9]. For example, Agard et al. [8] demonstrated in rats with hypoxia- and monocrotaline-induced PAH that metformin retarded pulmonary vascular proliferation and remodelling, as well as improved pulmonary artery vasoreactivity. While these studies suggest clinical potential, there have been no studies in humans to demonstrate translational efficacy of metformin in PAH-CHD. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of short-term treatments with a combination regimen consisting of bosentan and metformin in PAH-CHD patients compared with bosentan monotherapy, and also explore the possible mechanism of action of metformin in those patients.

Methods

This prospective, randomised study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Nanchang University on Human Research (Nanchang, China) and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Consecutive adult patients (18–65 years of age) first diagnosed with PAH-CHD at our hospital between May 2016 and December 2017 were enrolled.

The inclusion criteria of this study were patients defined as being at intermediate risk with 5–10% estimated 1-year mortality according to the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society/International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines [17]. Exclusion criteria were patients who progressed to pulmonary-to-systemic or bidirectional shunting (Eisenmenger's syndrome), developed PAH after defect correction, were diagnosed with type 1/2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (defined as blood glucose of ≥7.8 mmol·L⁻¹ or more but <11.1 mmol·L⁻¹ after a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test), or had abnormal liver/kidney function tests. All patients underwent right heart catheterisation for a definitive diagnosis of PAH, and to assess the severity of haemodynamic impairment before and after treatments. Other assessments included self-assessment of symptoms, WHO functional class, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and echocardiography for structural and functional measurements of right heart function. Plasma NT-proBNP and EDN1 were measured by human-specific ELISAs as per the manufacturers' instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Treatment

All enrolled patients were randomised to receive an endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan, initially at 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and then 125 mg twice daily) for 3 months with or without the combination treatment of metformin (500 mg twice daily). Liver function tests were performed every 2 weeks during the first 2 months and monthly thereafter. Patients who could not tolerate bosentan at 125 mg twice daily were down-titrated to 62.5 mg twice daily.

After 3 months treatments, all patients underwent right heart catheterisation and acute vasoreactivity testing, and operability was assessed by our paediatric heart surgery team. Selected patients underwent operations with biventricular circulation. The criteria for shunt closure based on the baseline right heart catheterisation and acute vasoreactivity testing were a baseline PVR index <6 Wood units (WU) per m² and PVR/systemic vascular resistance (SVR) ratio <0.3 [18, 19]. In patients with a baseline PVR index between 6 and 9 WU·m⁻² and a PVR/SVR ratio of 0.3–0.5, acute vasoreactivity testing was performed. If there was a 20% decrease in PVR index and PVR/SVR ratio, or final results of PVR index <6 WU·m⁻² and PVR/SVR ratio <0.3, patients were eligible for the operation. Additional criteria included the type of defect, age and the pulmonary/systemic flow ratio. Lung needle biopsy specimens were collected from different areas of either the left or right lung before cardiopulmonary bypass intraoperatively and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for further analysis.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from lung samples using Trizol (Life Technologies). The quantity and integrity of RNA were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and an Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Isolated RNA was treated with DNAase I (Life Technologies). Single-stranded complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesised from 1 μg RNA using a Transcriptor first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR analysis was carried out using predesigned PrimeTime quantitative PCR assays (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) on a Lightcycler 480 (Roche). The gene expression levels of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS; NOS3, Hs.PT.58.27740527), inducible NO synthase (NOS2, Hs.PT.58.14740388), neuronal NO synthase (NOS1, Hs.PT.58.24422037), EDN1 (Hs.PT.58.28278183.g), EDN2 (Hs.PT.58.20315946), endothelin receptor type A (EDNRA, Hs.PT.58.3235504) and endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB, Hs.PT.58.40275179) were normalised to two housekeeping genes (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin (ACTB)) by subtracting the geometric mean cycle threshold (C_t) of housekeeping genes from the C_t for the gene of interest to produce a ΔC_t value. The ΔC_t for each treatment sample was compared with the mean ΔC_t for vehicle-treated samples using the relative quantification 2-ΔΔC_t method to determine fold change [20].

Statistical analysis

All normally distributed data are presented as mean±sd unless stated otherwise. Group means were compared using Student's t-test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. An ANCOVA, with the main outcome at 3 months follow-up as the dependent variable and baseline value and treatment group as independent variables, was used to estimate the mean effect in each treatment arm, considering the potential baseline differences [21]. Analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

During the study period, 93 patients were enrolled: 48 were randomised to bosentan monotherapy, and 45 to the combination treatment of bosentan and metformin. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics and haemodynamic parameters (table 1). The mean age of all participants was 31.2 years and 62.4% were female. The majority of patients (82.8%) developed PAH associated with a ventricular septal defect. 92.5% of participants had WHO functional class III symptoms. None of the patients had been treated with any PAH-specific drugs (e.g. sildenafil or bosentan) prior to the study.

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics in bosentan monotherapy and bosentan/metformin combination therapy groups

	Bosentan	Bosentan/metformin	p-value#
Patients n	48	45
Age years	32.5±13.2	28.6±10.4	0.119
Females n (%)	32 (66.7%)	26 (57.8%)	0.399
BMI kg·m−2	22.4±5.4	23.6±6.4	0.331
Heart defects n (%)			0.663
ASD	7 (14.6%)	5 (11.1%)
VSD	39 (81.2%)	38 (84.4%)
PDA	0 (0%)	1 (2.2%)
TAPVR	2 (4.2%)	1 (2.2%)
WHO functional class n (%)			0.761
II	4 (8.3%)	3 (6.7%)
III	44 (91.7%)	42 (93.3%)
6MWD m	315±125	329±122	0.586
NT-proBNP ng·L−1	626±253	746±319	0.046
Peak TRV m·s−1	3.5±0.7	3.9±1.2	0.051
RA area cm2	30±8	33±9	0.092
Mean PAP mmHg	55±12	61±18	0.060
RAP mmHg	18±8	16±7	0.204
PAWP mmHg	8.9±3.3	8.8±3.6	0.889
PVR index WU·m−2	6.8±0.9	6.6±0.9	0.287
PVR/SVR ratio	0.38±0.13	0.41±0.16	0.322
Cardiac index L·min−1·m−2	2.2±0.3	2.3±0.2	0.635
SvO2	68±9%	70±9%	0.287

Data are presented as mean±sd unless otherwise stated. BMI: body mass index; ASD: atrial septal defect; VSD: ventricular septal defect; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; TAPVR: total anomalous pulmonary venous return; WHO: World Health Organization; 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; TRV: tricuspid regurgitation velocity; RA: right atrial; PAP: pulmonary arterial pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood unit; SVR: systemic vascular resistance; S_vO2: mixed venous oxygen saturation.^#: Chi-squared test or t-test as appropriate.

Treatment outcomes

All patients survived and had the follow-up visit at 3 months. Four patients in the monotherapy group and three patients in the combination therapy group did not tolerate bosentan at 125 mg twice daily, suffering moderate to severe liver dysfunction and/or elevated aminotransferases greater than three times the upper limit of normal, and were down-titrated to 62.5 mg twice daily. One patient stopped metformin at 2 weeks of treatment due to severe diarrhoea and was excluded from statistical analysis. One patient in the monotherapy group needed hospitalisation due to pneumonia at 6 weeks.

Fasting blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c levels and lipid profile were not affected by either bosentan monotherapy or bosentan/metformin combination therapy for 3 months (data not shown). Three patients in the bosentan monotherapy group and two patients in the combination therapy group did not have improvements in any observational parameters. Compared with baseline, WHO functional class, 6MWD, NT-proBNP and right heart haemodynamic variables all improved with bosentan monotherapy and bosentan/metformin combination therapy (table 2). The improvement in 6MWD from treatment initiation to the 3-month follow-up was significantly greater in patients treated with combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (95±136 versus 48±119 m, p=0.017) (table 3 and figure 1a). The improvement in PVR index in combination therapy was also significantly greater than in monotherapy group (−1.8±1.2 versus−1.2±1.3 WU·m⁻², p<0.001) (table 3 and figure 1b). Interestingly, the PVR/SVR ratio in the combination therapy group, but not in the monotherapy group, demonstrated a significant reduction in acute vasoreactivity when challenged with NO during right heart catheterisation (0.31±0.11 versus 0.25±0.15, p<0.05). There were no differences in plasma EDN1 levels between the two groups after treatment (2.25±0.91 versus 2. 18±1.12 pg·mL⁻¹, p>0.05).

TABLE 2.

Baseline characteristics and haemodynamic changes from baseline to 3 months evaluation in the bosentan monotherapy group versus the bosentan/metformin combination therapy group

Variables	Bosentan#			Bosentan/metformin¶
	Baseline	3 months	p-value+	Baseline	3 months	p value+
BMI kg·m−2	22.4±5.4	23.1±6.2	0.557	23.5±6.1	22.5±5.4	0.397
WHO functional class n (%)			<0.001			<0.001
II	4 (8.3%)	22 (45.8%)		3 (6.8%)	28 (63.6%)
III	44 (91.7%)	26 (54.2%)		41 (93.2%)	16 (36.4%)
6MWD m	315±125	368±103	0.026	324±121	426±111	<0.001
NT-proBNP ng·L−1	626±253	438±189	<0.001	743±316	568±269	0.006
Peak TRV m·s−1	3.5±0.7	3.1±0.6	0.003	3.9±1.2	3.2±0.9	0.003
RA area cm2	30±8	28±9	0.253	32±9	31±8	0.583
Mean PAP mmHg	55±12	43±9	<0.001	60 ±18	40±10	<0.001
RAP mmHg	18±8	11±7	<0.001	16±6	10±6	<0.001
PAWP mmHg	8.9±3.3	9.2±3.8	0.681	8.7±3.5	8.9±3.4	0.786
PVR index WU·m−2	6.8±0.9	5.6±1.1 5.3±1.3§	<0.001	6.6±0.9	4.8±0.8 4.4±1.5§	<0.001
PVR/SVR ratio	0.38±0.13	0.28±0.16 0.26±0.18§	<0.001	0.41±0.17	0.31±0.11 0.25±0.15§	<0.001
Cardiac index L·min−1·m−2	2.2±0.3	2.5±0.4	<0.001	2.3±0.2	2.6±0.4	<0.001
SvO2	68±9%	70±8%	0.253	71±9%	72±9%	0.604

Data are presented as mean±sd unless otherwise stated. BMI: body mass index; WHO: World Health Organization; 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; TRV: tricuspid regurgitation velocity; RA: right atrial; PAP: pulmonary arterial pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood unit; SVR: systemic vascular resistance; S_vO2: mixed venous oxygen saturation. ^#: n=48; ^¶: n=44; ⁺: Chi-squared test or t-test as appropriate; ^§: results of acute vasoreactivity testing with nitric oxide.

TABLE 3.

Differences in treatment effects between the bosentan monotherapy and bosentan/metformin combination therapy groups

Variables	Change from baseline mean±sd		Treatment effect mean change (95% CI)	p-value#
	Bosentan	Bosentan/metformin
6MWD m	48±119	95±136	52 (10–95)	0.017
NT-proBNP ng·L−1	−176±325	−183±415	−141 (−236– −47)	0.094
Mean PAP mmHg	−12±15	−20±19	−3 (−7–1)	0.145
PVR index WU·m−2	−1.2±1.3	−1.8±1.2	−0.8 (−1.2– −0.4)	<0.001
PVR/SVR ratio	−0.07±0.19	−0.11±0.19	−0.10 (−0.63–0.43)	0.148
Cardiac index L·min−1·m−2	0.3±0.5	0.3±0.4	0.11 (−0.61–0.28)	0.27

6MWD: 6-min walking distance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PAP: pulmonary arterial pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood unit; SVR: systemic vascular resistance.^#: ANCOVA adjusted for a baseline covariate.

FIGURE 1.

a) 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and b) pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) index at baseline and 3-month follow-up in each group using fitted lines. The estimated difference between the groups from ANCOVA is the vertical distance between the two lines.

After 3 months of treatment, 40 out of 48 patients on monotherapy and 38 out of 44 patients on combination therapy were eligible for operations with biventricular circulation. There were no significant differences in surgical data and postoperative evolution (table 4). All the patients who underwent surgical interventions continued treatment and were alive at the 1-month follow-up.

TABLE 4.

Peri- and postoperative characteristics in the bosentan monotherapy and bosentan/metformin combination therapy groups

	Bosentan	Bosentan/metformin
Patients undergoing operation n (%)	40 (83.3%)	38 (86.4%)
CPB time min	48±13	56±13
Cross-clamping time min	26±9	24±8
Hospital mortality	0 (0%)	0 (0%)
Mechanical ventilation time h	18±8	16±6
Length of ICU stay h	36±9	28±6
Length of hospital stay days	12±6	10±4
Infection	4 (10%)	6 (15.8%)
Reintubation	3 (7.5%)	2 (5.3%)
Tracheotomy	1 (2.5%)	0 (0%)
Arrhythmia	12 (30%)	9 (23.7%)
Neurologic complication	2 (5%)	3 (7.9%)

Data are presented as mean±sd or n (%). CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; ICU: intensive care unit.

Safety

Patients in both treatment groups reported typical PAH symptoms or signs with similar frequency. These were thought not to be associated with increased bosentan- or metformin-related side-effects. The most commonly observed drug related symptoms were facial flushing (monotherapy/combination therapy n=4/6), headache (n=12/8), gastrointestinal disturbance (n=3/7) and swelling of the legs (n=5/3).

Pulmonary gene expression after treatments

To determine the effect of metformin on pulmonary vascular tone, we first measured pulmonary gene expression related to NO and EDN pathways. Compared with bonsentan monotherapy, bosentan/metformin combination therapy significantly decreased EDN1 expression in the lung (p=0.006, figure 2). However, there were no significant differences in the gene expression of NOS3, NOS2, NOS1, EDN2, EDNRA or EDNRB between the two treatment groups (figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

Pulmonary mRNA expression of a) endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3), b) inducible NO synthase (NOS2), c) neuronal NO synthase (NOS1), d) endothelin 1 (EDN1), e) endothelin 2 (EDN2), f) endothelin receptor type A (EDNRA) and g) endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB) after bosentan monotherapy (Mono) and bosentan/metformin combination therapy (Combi) for 3 months. Groups were compared using Student's t-test. Expression was normalised to the geometric mean of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin (ACTB). Data are presented as mean±sd. *: p<0.05.

Discussion

Our study describes a novel pharmacological combination treatment for PAH-CHD treatment before selected surgical shunt closure. Either monotherapy or combination therapy significantly improved WHO functional class, 6MWD, NT-pro BNP and right heart haemodynamic parameters. Patients who received bosentan/metformin combination therapy experienced additional improvements in exercise capacity (6MWD), PVR index and vascular reactivity responses to NO. This suggests metformin added to bosentan therapy may confer additional benefits, in terms of future survival and operability, in PAH-CHD patients with intermediate risk.

In the present study, for the first time, we demonstrated that metformin combined with bosentan significantly decreased pulmonary EDN1 expression in PAH-CHD patients compared with bosentan monotherapy. Decreased circulating EDN1 levels after bosentan or metformin treatments were described in previous studies [22–25]. However, no additional effects of metformin in plasma EDN1 levels were observed when comparing the monotherapy with combination therapy groups in our study.

EDN1 is a strong vasoconstrictor and proliferative cytokine, and is one of key mediators of PAH development. Both plasma EDN1 levels and EDN1 expression in the lungs were elevated in patients with PAH and correlated with raised PVR [26–29]. Furthermore, the clinical application of bosentan, and its beneficial effects on exercise capacity and haemodynamics, as well as the time to clinical worsening in PAH patients, also emphasise the important role of EDN1 in PAH.

Indeed, it is reported that activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) by metformin suppresses EDN1-induced pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation in rats [30], and inhibits EDN1 expression at the transcriptional and translational level in the aorta [31]. Moreover, SMC-specific EDN1 deletion attenuates hypoxia-induced increases in pulmonary vascular tone and structural remodelling, whereas exposure to selective EDN1 receptor antagonists had no effects [32], suggesting that local EDN1 expression may play an independent role in modulating vascular tone. Decreased pulmonary EDN1 expression might be a major contributor to the beneficial effects of metformin treatment observed in the present study.

Metformin lowers glucose levels and improves insulin sensitivity, and has been recently described as a pleiotropic molecule [33]. The action of metformin in AMPK activation, which has been well documented in previous studies [34, 35], is suggested to be a significant pathway target for pulmonary hypertension [9]. AMPK is a heterotrimeric enzyme that is expressed in many tissues, including the lungs and vasculature, and plays a central role in in cellular and organ metabolism [36]. NO, a potent vasodilator and a suppressor of SMC proliferation, is important in the modulation of the PVR [37]. Activation of AMPK by metformin stimulates NO synthesis in aortic endothelial cells by increasing phosphorylation and activation of eNOS [38, 39]. In our study, the mRNA levels of NOS3 were not affected by metformin treatment. Consistent results were demonstrated in the study by Sartoretto et al. [16] that metformin treatment improves vascular reactivity by increasing eNOS activity but not eNOS expression. Other mechanisms, however, might be involved in the effect of metformin on vascular function. For example, a direct effect of metformin on VSMC function, in terms of tyrosine kinase activity, glucose transport and intracellular calcium, has also been suggested by previous studies [40]. Moreover, metformin has shown an endothelium-independent effect on potentiating phenylephrine-induced AMPK phosphorylation and promoting vasorelaxation in endothelium-denuded rat aortic rings [41].

A limitation of this study is that it was designed to assess short-term use of a combination therapy on improving pulmonary haemodynamics and 1-month outcomes in patients with PAH-CHD. Long-term data are currently unavailable for survival/prognosis and safety evaluations. Due to limited tissue size from a lung needle biopsy, protein analysis was not able to be carried out alongside with the study of gene expression.

Perspectives

In conclusion, our study shows that combination therapy with bosentan and metformin in PAH-CHD patients may provide improvements in important outcomes such as exercise capacity and pulmonary haemodynamics, compared with bosentan alone. Further evaluation of this approach in a large multicentre randomised controlled study is warranted, with a longer period of follow-up.