Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2018 Apr 6;360(6384):71–75. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4239

Enzymatic Construction of Highly Strained Carbocycles

Kai Chen 1, Xiongyi Huang 1, S B Jennifer Kan 1, Ruijie K Zhang 1, Frances H Arnold 1,*
PMCID: PMC6104391  NIHMSID: NIHMS983961  PMID: 29622650

Abstract

Small carbocycles are structurally rigid and possess high intrinsic energy due to their significant ring strain. These unique features lead to broad applications, but also create challenges for their construction. We report the discovery and engineering of hemeproteins that catalyze the formation of chiral bicyclobutanes, one of the most strained four-membered systems, via successive carbene addition to unsaturated carbon–carbon bonds. Enzymes that produce cyclopropenes, putative intermediates to the bicyclobutanes, were also identified. These genetically-encoded proteins are readily optimized by directed evolution, function in Escherichia coli, and act on structurally diverse substrates with high efficiency and selectivity, providing an effective route to many chiral strained structures. This biotransformation is easily performed on preparative scale and the resulting strained carbocycles can be derivatized, opening myriad potential applications.

One Sentence Summary

Heme enzymes engineered by directed evolution catalyze the asymmetric formation of highly strained bicyclobutanes and cyclopropenes.


In cyclic organic molecules, ring strain arises from distortions of bond angle and bond length, steric clashes of non-bonded substituents, and other effects (1). The simplest carbocycles, cyclopropanes and cyclobutanes, possess ring strains of 26–28 kcal/mol (2). Introducing carbon–carbon multiple bonds or bridges to these small ring systems induces additional strain as well as structural rigidity. For example, cyclopropenes with an endo-cyclic double bond bear a strain of 54 kcal/mol, whereas bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes, folded into puckered structures, distinguish themselves as one of the most strained four-membered systems with around 66 kcal/mol strain (Figure S1) (2). These carbocycles are particularly attractive intermediates in chemical and materials synthesis, since they can undergo strain-release transformations to furnish a myriad of useful scaffolds (36). The structural rigidity imparted by strained rings in supramolecular materials can lead to interesting physical properties, such as mechanical stability (7) and high glass-transition temperature (8). The intrinsic energy of these strained structures can also be relieved in response to exogenous force, which leads to radical changes in physical properties (e.g. conductivity), a feature highly desirable for stimulus-responsive materials (9, 10).

High ring strain, however, greatly increases the difficulty of synthesis. A commonly used method for preparing bicyclobutanes starts from dibromo-2-(bromomethyl)cyclopropane substructures and utilizes organolithium reagents for lithium-halogen exchange followed by nucleophilic substitution under rigorously anhydrous and cryogenic conditions (3). An alternative route relies on the double transfer of a carbene to alkynes, but the few examples in the literature are mostly limited to methylene carbene (1113). Asymmetric bicyclobutane construction is particularly challenging, with multiple chiral centers generated at the same time (14, 15) (Figure S2). Cyclopropene synthesis through enantioselective single carbene addition to alkynes also requires chiral transition metal catalysts based on rhodium (16, 17), iridium (18) and cobalt (19). Development of a sustainable catalytic system that performs with high efficiency and selectivity under ambient conditions would be a significant advance for construction of these useful, highly strained carbocycles.

Enzymes, the catalytic workhorses of biology, are capable of accelerating chemical transformations by orders of magnitude while exhibiting exquisite control over selectivity (20). Although nature synthesizes various cyclopropane-containing products (21), cyclopropene or bicyclobutane fragments are extremely rare (Figure S3) (22, 23). This may be attributed to the lack of biological machinery for synthesizing these motifs and/or the instability of these structures under biological or natural product isolation/purification conditions. Nevertheless, we envisioned that existing enzymes could be repurposed to forge strained carbocycles by taking advantage of their catalytic promiscuity (24, 25) in the presence of non-natural substrates and by using directed evolution to increase the newly-discovered activity and selectivity (26).

In the past several years, we and others have engineered natural hemeproteins to catalyze reactions not known in nature (2732). We hypothesized that carbene transfer to triple bonds with a heme-dependent enzyme might afford highly strained cyclopropene and bicyclobutane structures and do so enantioselectively. We anticipated several challenges at the outset, especially in bicyclobutane formation, as it involves two sequential carbene additions to the alkyne substrate: 1) the enzyme would need to bind the alkyne in a specific conformation in order to transfer the carbene enantioselectively; 2) the high-energy cyclopropene intermediate generated by the first carbene addition would need to be accepted and stabilized by the protein; 3) compared to methylene carbene used previously, a substituted carbene (e.g. with an ester group) might hinder access of the cyclopropene to the iron-carbenoid; and 4) the protein would also be expected to possess precise stereocontrol over the second carbene transfer step regardless of structural differences between the initial alkyne and the cyclopropene intermediate. Despite these challenges, we decided to investigate whether a starting enzyme with this unusual and non-natural activity could be identified, and whether its active site could be engineered to create a suitable environment for substrate binding, intermediate stabilization, and selective product formation.

We first tested whether free heme (± bovine serum albumin (BSA)), which is known to catalyze styrene cyclopropanation (27), could transfer carbene to an alkyne. Reactions using ethyl diazoacetate (EDA) and phenylacetylene (1a) as substrates in neutral buffer (M9-N minimal medium, pH 7.4) at room temperature, however, gave no cyclopropene or bicyclobutane product. Next, a panel of hemeproteins including cytochromes P450, cytochromes P411 (P450 with an axial serine ligand), cytochromes c and globins in the form of E. coli whole-cell catalysts were tested for the desired transformation under anaerobic conditions (32), but none were fruitful (Figure 1C and Table S1). Interestingly, a P411 variant obtained in a previous cyclopropanation study, P411-S1 I263W (see Supplemental Materials for sources, sequences and mutations), afforded a furan product (3b) with a total turnover number (TTN) of 210. Since other furan analogs have been identified as adducts of carbenes and alkynes (33), we were curious as to how furan 3b was generated. Preliminary kinetic study of the enzymatic reaction suggested that the enzyme first synthesized an unstable cyclopropene (3a), which subsequently rearranged to the furan either spontaneously or with assistance from the enzyme (Figure 1B and S5). This result provided strong evidence that the P411 hemeprotein is capable of transferring a carbene to an alkyne, which is, to our knowledge, an activity not previously reported for any protein or even any iron complex.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) Overall reaction of carbene transfer to an alkyne catalyzed by an engineered hemeprotein. (B) Proposed catalytic cycle of carbene transfer to phenylacetylene to form cyclopropene and bicyclobutane structures. (C) Screening of hemin and hemeprotein catalysts for bicyclobutane formation (BSA = bovine serum albumin; for sources, sequences, and mutations in Bacillus megaterium P411-S1 and other proteins, see Supplementary Materials). (D) X-ray crystal structure of P411-E10 (PDB ID: 5UCW) and view of its distal heme region. The heme axial ligand is S400, and amino acid residues V78, L263 and S438 are shown as gray sticks. (E) Directed evolution of P411-E10 for bicyclobutane formation (using phenylacetylene and EDA as substrates; numbers refer to total turnovers to product (TTN) measured). Experiments were performed on analytical scale using suspensions of E. coli expressing P411-E10 variants (OD600 = 10–30), 10 mM phenylacetylene, 10 mM EDA, 5 vol% EtOH, M9-N buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature under anaerobic conditions for 6 h. Reactions performed in quadruplicate. Here TTN refers to the total desired product, as quantified by gas chromatography (GC), divided by total hemeprotein. (Note: because bicyclobutane formation requires two carbene transfers, the number of carbene transfers the hemeprotein catalyzes is 2 x TTN in these reactions.) Further details on reaction conditions and data analysis are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

To divert the enzymatic reaction to bicyclobutane formation, the enzyme is required to transfer a second carbene to cyclopropene intermediate 3a before the cyclopropene rearranges to the undesired furan product (Figure 1B). We thus tested P411 variants closely related to P411-S1 I263W. We reasoned that amino acid residue 263, which resides in the distal pocket, above the heme cofactor, might modulate the rate of this step and that the bulky tryptophan (Trp) side chain at this site may be blocking the second carbene transfer. A P411-S1 variant with phenylalanine (Phe) instead of Trp at this position (I263F) in fact catalyzed bicyclobutane formation at a very low level (< 5 TTN) (Table S1). Variant ‘P4’ with 3 additional mutations relative to P411-S1 I263F (V87A, A268G and A328V) (28) synthesized the desired bicyclobutane 2a with 80 TTN and with the formation of furan adduct substantially suppressed (2a: 3b > 50: 1, Figure 1C). Another related P411 variant, E10 (= P4 A78V A82L F263L), which was engineered from P4 for nitrene transfer reactions (29), catalyzed the desired transformation with > 6-fold higher activity (530 TTN, Figure 1E). NMR analysis revealed an exo, endo-configuration of the enzymatically-produced bicyclobutane 2a, which is distinct from the only reported achiral endo, endo-isomer, made using an osmium-porphyrin complex (34, 35). We chose this P411-E10 variant as the starting template for directed evolution of a more efficient bicyclobutane-constructing enzyme.

Because the side chain of residue 263 influenced formation of the bicyclobutane product, we performed site-saturation mutagenesis (SSM) of variant E10 at position 263 and screened whole E. coli cells expressing the mutated proteins for improved production of bicyclobutane 2a. The enzyme having leucine at this position (263L) was the most active; other amino acid residues either lowered the reactivity towards bicyclobutane formation and/or delivered more furan product. In parallel, two additional residues in E10, V78 and S438, were also targeted by SSM. Aromatic residues were found to be activating at 78, with a phenylalanine or tyrosine mutation giving 1.5 – 2-fold improvement over E10. This beneficial mutational effect may stem from a π-π stacking interaction between the side chain and the alkyne substrate or the cyclopropene intermediate. A single S438A mutation on a loop residing above the heme also significantly increased the activity, giving >2.5-fold increase in turnover. Finally, recombination of V78F/Y and S438A mutations led to the discovery of even more powerful biocatalysts for bicyclobutane formation (e.g. 1880 TTN with E10 V78F S438A, Figure 1E and S9).

With the evolved E10 V78F S438A variant in hand, we next assayed the bacterial catalyst against a panel of aromatic alkyne coupling partners. Biotransformations with 10 different substrates were performed on 0.1 – 0.2 mmol scale. These preparative-scale reactions proceeded smoothly to furnish the corresponding bicyclobutanes with up to 1760 TTN and 80% yield (Figure 2A). Additionally, three alkynes, 1k, 1l and 1m, were transformed in mmol scale, and bicyclobutanes were isolated in hundred-milligram quantities, demonstrating that the biocatalytic transformation is readily scalable. Among the 13 different substrates, the engineered P411 hemeprotein did not exhibit strong preference toward specific electronic or steric features. Electron-deficient halides (2b2d), which can be used as pre-functionalities for further transformations as well as electron-rich alkyl or alkoxyl groups (2e2h and 2k) at meta- or para-position of the phenyl group were accepted by the enzyme. Even heterocyclic substrates such as thiophene (2j) served as suitable alkyne partners, albeit with lower reactivity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Scope of P411-E10 V78F S438A-catalyzed bicyclobutane formation. Standard conditions of preparative-scale reactions (0.1 – 0.2 mmol scale, unless otherwise indicated): suspension of E. coli (OD600=15 – 20) expressing P411 E10-V78F S438A, 1.0 equiv aromatic alkyne, 2.0 – 4.0 equiv EDA, 10 – 15 mM D-glucose, 1 – 5 vol% EtOH, M9-N buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature under anaerobic conditions for 12 hours. Isolated yields. TTN determined based on isolated yields. (B) Derivatization of bicyclobutane products. a) and b) copper-catalyzed click cyclization of 2l with azide substrates; c) esterification of 2m with Mosher’s acid; d) reduction of 2k to diol with LiBH4. Further details on reaction conditions and data analysis are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Free functionalities, including alcohols (2i and 2m) and a second alkyne (2l), are well-preserved, providing an additional opportunity for derivatization of these products. A terminal alkyne allows copper-catalyzed click chemistry, through which bicyclobutane 2l can be modified with a simple sulfonyl azide (4a) or even decorated with biologically relevant fragments, such as a phenylalanine derivative (4b). An unprotected hydroxyl group could also offer the possibility of linkage to useful structures. Additionally, in order to probe the enantiopurity of bicyclobutane products, we derivatized 2l and 2m with L-azido-phenylalanine and (R)-Mosher’s acid, respectively. The diastereomeric excess of these derivatized products would inform us the enantiomeric ratio of the bicyclobutanes. In fact, we observed only one diastereomer of derivatized bicyclobutanes 4b and 4c by NMR. Furthermore, the dicarboxylic esters on the bicyclobutane structure can be reduced easily with a mild reducing reagent, LiBH4, to give diol product 4d with the strained ring structure preserved. The diol product 4d allowed for the unequivocal confirmation of the bicyclobutane structure and determination of the absolute configuration through X-ray crystallography.

We next asked whether the enzyme could stop at the cyclopropene product if less reactive aliphatic alkynes are used. To this end, we examined enzyme variants from the P411-S1 lineage for cyclopropene formation, using phenylbutyne (5a) and EDA as starting reagents. Encouragingly, P4 catalyzed the desired transformation with 260 TTN and 95.5: 4.5 er. Further evolution was performed on P4 to improve its catalytic efficiency. We first targeted position 87, known for its importance to substrate recognition in P450-catalyzed oxidations (36). A87F (290 TTN, 3.0: 97.0 er) and A87W (240 TTN, 97.1: 2.9 er) were found to exert the opposite enantio-preference, suggesting that residue 87 also controls substrate orientation for non-native carbene chemistry. Using P4 A87F and P4 A87W as parents, single- and double-site-saturation mutagenesis were conducted sequentially to improve both reactivity and selectivity (Figure 3A, S11 and S13). The final K10 and C6 variants performed with >10-fold higher reactivity compared to the initial P4 variant and with excellent stereocontrol (99.55: 0.45 er and 99.95: 0.05 er, respectively).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) Evolutionary trajectory of P411-P4 variants for stereodivergent cyclopropenation of aliphatic alkynes. (B) Scope of P411-C6-catalyzed cyclopropene formation. Conditions of preparative-scale reactions (0.08 – 0.4 mmol scale): suspension of E. coli expressing P411-C6 or K10 (OD600 = 10 – 32), 10 – 150 mM alkyne, 1.0 – 4.0 equiv EDA (6.0 equiv for 5m), 10 – 15 mM D-glucose, 1 – 5 vol% EtOH, M9-N buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature under anaerobic conditions for 12 hours. Isolated yields. TTN determined based on isolated yields and enantiomeric ratio (er) determined by chiral HPLC. (C) Enzymatic cyclopropenation at mmol scale and derivatization of corresponding products. a) copper-catalyzed addition to cyclopropene 6a for synthesizing a multi-substituted cyclopropane; b) Diels-Alder reaction of cyclopropene 6h with 1,3-diMe-butadiene to form a fused ring system. Further details on reaction conditions and data analysis are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

To evaluate the substrate range of the evolved P411 variants for cyclopropene construction, we focused on P411-C6 and examined structurally diverse aliphatic alkynes. Enzymatic reactions with 12 alkynes in preparative scale (up to 5.0 mmol scale) afforded the desired cyclopropenes with TTNs ranging from hundreds to thousands and good to excellent stereoselectivities (Figure 3B and 3C). Alkynes with a linear carbon chain (5b) or cyclic fragments (5g, 5h and 5j) all served as good substrates. Different functional groups, including ether (5f, 5i and 5l), ester (5d), acetal (5e), chloride (5k), and free hydroxyl (5m), were well-tolerated. Further optimization of reaction conditions with slow addition of EDA, for example, would likely improve the isolated yields, as we demonstrated for cyclopropene 6h (66% yield, Figure 3B; and 94% yield, Figure 3C).

Cyclopropenes are used as synthetic building blocks (4, 37), bio-orthogonal imaging precursors (38), and monomers in polymer synthesis (39). Our ability to construct these motifs using bacteria at scale allows us to further explore their potential utility in diverse fields. Here we present two simple transformations of cyclopropenes to build a multi-substituted cyclopropane 7a and a fused ring system, bicyclo[4.1.0]heptene 7b (Figure 3C), both of which are substructures common in pharmaceutical candidates and bioactive natural products (21).

In conclusion, we have developed a biocatalytic platform for the construction of highly strained bicyclobutanes and cyclopropenes through directed evolution of a serine-ligated cytochrome P450 (P411) enzyme. That the protein could be quickly adapted to produce these highly strained structures (2–6 mutational steps) highlights the evolvability of the P411 scaffold and its potential to direct the construction of complex motifs. The protein enabled the desired transformations through activation of iron-carbenoid for carbene addition to alkynes, stabilization of the reactive cyclopropene intermediate (in bicyclobutane formation), and precise stereocontrol of the carbene transfer processes. Biotransformations with the evolved enzymes have a surprisingly broad substrate scope with high reactivity and selectivity, providing a route to more than 25 products in preparative scale. This biocatalytic system grants facile access to versatile molecular architectures rarely seen in nature, expanding the set of chemical structures available to biological systems.

Supplementary Material

SupplementaryMaterials

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF2809 to the Caltech Programmable Molecular Technology Initiative, and the National Science Foundation, Office of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems SusChEM Initiative (Grant CBET-1403077). R.K.Z. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF GRFP; Grant DGE-1144469), is a trainee in the Caltech Biotechnology Leadership Program, and has received financial support from the Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. We thank D. K. Romney, S. C. Hammer and S.-Q. Zhang for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to C. K. Pier, O. F. Brandenberg and A. M. Knight for sharing hemeprotein variants and to K. Ding (Anderson Lab, Caltech) and J. Li (Grubbs Lab, Caltech) for the generous donation of materials and reagents. We also thank S. Virgil and the Caltech Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis, N. Torian and the Caltech Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, and M. K. Takase and L. Henling and Caltech X-ray Crystallography Facility for analytical support, and the Brian Stoltz lab for use of their polarimeter and chiral gas chromatography. A provisional patent application has been filed through the California Institute of Technology based on the results presented here. Crystallographic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/) under reference number 1815089 for compound 4d.

References and Notes

  • 1.Wiberg KB, The Concept of Strain in Organic Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 25, 312–322 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anslyn EV, Dougherty DA, Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. (University Science, Sausalito, CA, 2006), Chapter 2: Strain and Stability. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walczak MAA, Krainz T, Wipf P, Ring-Strain-Enabled Reaction Discovery: New Heterocycles from Bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes. Acc. Chem. Res 48, 1149–1158 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marek I, Simaan S, Masarwa A, Enantiomerically Enriched Cyclopropene Derivatives: Versatile Building Blocks in Asymmetric Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 46, 7364–7376 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Meijere A, Kozhushkov SI, Schill H, Three-Membered-Ring-Based Molecular Architectures. Chem. Rev 106, 4926–4996 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gianatassio R, Lopchuk JM, Wang J, Pan C-M, Malins LR, Prieto L, Brandt TA, Collins MR, Gallego GM, Sach NW, Spangler JE, Zhu H, Zhu J, Baran PS, Strain-Release Amination. Science 351, 241–246 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dilmaç AM, Spuling E, de Meijere A, Bräse S, Propellanes—From a Chemical Curiosity to “Explosive” Materials and Natural Products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 56, 5684–5718 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Longo JM, Sanford MJ, Coates GW, Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides with Discrete Metal Complexes: Structure−Property Relationships. Chem. Rev 116, 15167–15197 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Swager TM, Dougherty DA, Grubbs RH, Strained Rings as a Source of Unsaturation: Polybenzvalene, a New Soluble Polyacetylene Precursor. J. Am. Chem. Soc 110, 2973–2974 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen Z, Mercer JAM, Zhu X, Romaniuk JAH, Pfattner R, Cegelski L, Martinez TJ, Burns NZ, Xia Y, Mechanochemical Unzipping of Insulating Polyladderene to Semiconducting Polyacetylene. Science 357, 475–479 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mahler W, Double Addition of a Carbene to an Acetylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc 84, 4600–4601 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doering W. von E., Coburn JF, 1, 3-dimethylbicyclo[1.1.0]butane. Tetrahedron Lett 6, 991–995 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wipf P, Stephenson CRJ, Okumura K, Transition-Metal-Mediated Cascade Reactions: C,C-Dicyclopropylmethylamines by Way of Double C,C-σ-Bond Insertion into Bicyclobutanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 125, 14694–14695 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Panish RP, Chintala SR, Boruta DT, Fang Y, Taylor MT, Fox JM, Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyclobutane via Sequential Rh-catalyzed Bicyclobutanation/Cu-Catalyzed Homoconjugate Addition. J. Am. Chem. Soc 135, 9283–9286 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qin C, Davies HML, Enantioselective Synthesis of 2-Arylbicyclo[1.1.0]butane Carboxylates. Org. Lett 15, 310–313 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lou Y, Horikawa M, Kloster RA, Hawryluk NA, Corey EJ, A New Chiral Rh(II) Catalyst for Enantioselective [2 + 1]-Cycloaddition. Mechanistic Implications and Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc 126, 8916–8918 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Briones JF, Hansen J, Hardcastle KI, Autschbach J, Davies HML, Highly Enantioselective Rh2(S-DOSP)4-Catalyzed Cyclopropenation of Alkynes with Styryldiazoacetates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 132, 17211–17215 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Uehara M, Suematsu H, Yasutomi Y, Katsuki T, Enantioenriched Synthesis of Cyclopropenes with a Quaternary Stereocenter, Versatile Building Blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc 133, 170–171 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cui X, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu S, Wojtas L, Zhang XP, Enantioselective Cyclopropenation of Alkynes with Acceptor/Acceptor-Substituted Diazo Reagents via Co(II)-Based Metalloradical Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 133, 3304–3307 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S, A Perspective on Enzyme Catalysis. Science 301, 1196–1202 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wessjohann LA, Brandt W, Biosynthesis and Metabolism of Cyclopropane Rings in Natural Compounds. Chem. Rev 103, 1625–1647 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Itoh T, Djerassi C, Acid-Catalyzed and Photochemical Isomerization of Steroidal Cyclopropenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 105, 4407–4416 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schneider C, Niisuke K, Boeglin WE, Voehler M, Stec DF, Porter NA, Brash AR, Enzymatic Synthesis of a Bicyclobutane Fatty Acid by a Hemoprotein−Lipoxygenase Fusion Protein from the Cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7120. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 104, 18941–18945 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS, Enzyme Promiscuity: a Mechanistic and Evolutionary Perspective. Ann. Rev. Biochem 79, 471–505 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bornscheuer UT, Kazlauskas RJ, Catalytic Promiscuity in Biocatalysis: Using Old Enzymes to Form New Bonds and Follow New Pathways. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 42, 6032–6040 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Renata H, Wang ZJ, Arnold FH, Expanding the Enzyme Universe: Accessing Non-Natural Reactions by Mechanism-Guided Directed Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 54, 3351–3367 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coelho PS, Brustad EM, Kannan A, Arnold FH, Olefin Cyclopropanation via Carbene Transfer Catalyzed by Engineered Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. Science 339, 307–310 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prier CK, Hyster TK, Farwell CC, Huang A, Arnold FH. Asymmetric Enzymatic Synthesis of Allylic Amines: A Sigmatropic Rearrangement Strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 55, 4711–4715 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prier CK, Zhang RK, Buller AR, Brinkmann-Chen S, Arnold FH. Enantioselective, Intermolecular Benzylic C–H Amination Catalysed by an Engineered Iron-Haem Enzyme. Nat. Chem 9, 629–634 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bajaj P, Sreenilayam G, Tyagi V, Fasan R, Gram-Scale Synthesis of Chiral Cyclopropane-Containing Drugs and Drug Precursors with Engineered Myoglobin Catalysts Featuring Complementary Stereoselectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 55, 16110–16114 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brandenberg OF, Fasan R, Arnold FH, Exploiting and Engineering Hemoproteins for Abiological Carbene and Nitrene Transfer Reactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 47, 102–111 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coelho PS, Wang ZJ, Ener ME, Baril SA, Kannan A, Arnold FH, Brustad EM, A Serine-Substituted P450 Catalyzes Highly Efficient Carbene Transfer to Olefins in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol 9, 485–487 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Davies HML, Romines KR, Direct Synthesis of Furans by 3 + 2 Cycloadditions between Rhodium(II) Acetate Stabilized Carbenoids and Acetylenes. Tetrahedron 44, 3343–3348 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith DA, Reynolds DN, Woo LK, Cyclopropanation Catalyzed by Osmium Porphyrin Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 115, 2511–2513 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hamaker CG, Djukic J-P, Smith DA, Woo LK, Mechanism of Cyclopropanation Reactions Mediated by (5,10,15,20-Tetra-p-tolylporphyrinato)osmium(II) Complexes. Organometallics 20, 5189–5199 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cirino PC, Arnold FH, Regioselectivity and Activity of Cytochrome P450 BM-3 and Mutant F87A in Reactions Driven by Hydrogen Peroxide. Adv. Synth. Catal 344, 932–937 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Delaye P-O, Didier D, Marek I, Diastereodivergent Carbometalation/Oxidation/Selective Ring Opening: Formation of All-Carbon Quaternary Stereogenic Centers in Acyclic Systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 52, 5333–5337 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patterson DM, Nazarova LA, Xie B, Kamber DN, Prescher JA, Functionalized Cyclopropenes As Bioorthogonal Chemical Reporters. J. Am. Chem. Soc 134, 18638–18643 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Elling BR, Xia Y, Living Alternating Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization Based on Single Monomer Additions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 137, 9922–9926 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SupplementaryMaterials

RESOURCES