Skip to main content
Channels logoLink to Channels
. 2018 Aug 1;12(1):176–186. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2018.1475794

Mexiletine rescues a mixed biophysical phenotype of the cardiac sodium channel arising from the SCN5A mutation, N406K, found in LQT3 patients

Rou-Mu Hu a,b, David J Tester c, Ryan Li d, Tianyu Sun d, Blaise Z Peterson d, Michael J Ackerman c, Jonathan C Makielski b, Bi-Hua Tan b,d,
PMCID: PMC6104686  PMID: 29983085

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Individual mutations in the SCN5A-encoding cardiac sodium channel α-subunit usually cause a single cardiac arrhythmia disorder, some cause mixed biophysical or clinical phenotypes. Here we report an infant, female patient harboring a N406K mutation in SCN5A with a marked and mixed biophysical phenotype and assess pathogenic mechanisms. Methods and Results: A patient suffered from recurrent seizures during sleep and torsades de pointes with a QTc of 530 ms. Mutational analysis identified a N406K mutation in SCN5A. The mutation was engineered by site-directed mutagenesis and heterologously expressed in HEK293 cells. After 48 hours incubation with and without mexiletine, macroscopic voltage-gated sodium current (INa) was measured with standard whole-cell patch clamp techniques. SCN5A-N406K elicited both a significantly decreased peak INa and a significantly increased late INa compared to wide-type (WT) channels. Furthermore, mexiletine both restored the decreased peak INa of the mutant channel and inhibited the increased late INa of the mutant channel. Conclusion: SCN5A-N406K channel displays both “gain-of-function” in late INa and “loss-of-function” in peak INa density contributing to a mixed biophysical phenotype. Moreover, our finding may provide the first example that mexiletine exerts a dual rescue of both “gain-of-function” and “loss-of-function” of the mutant sodium channel.

KEYWORDS: Mexiletine, mixed phenotype, mutation, SCN5A, sodium channel

Introduction

The gene SCN5A on chromosome 3 encodes the α-subunit of voltage-gated cardiac sodium channel (hNav1.5) that is responsible for generating a large peak inward Na current (INa) [1]. INa underlies initiation and propagation of action potentials in working myocardium (atrial and ventricular cells) and special conduction tissue (Purkinje cells etc.) [2]. Mutations in SCN5A are responsible for a spectrum of hereditary arrhythmias [3]. Phenotypic variability arises from the effects of the mutations on the hNav1.5 biophysical properties. These effects usually fall into two categories, gain or loss of channel function [4]. In “gain-of-function” mutations, an increase in the persistent late INa during the action potential plateau, rather than in peak INa is typically thought to be responsible for the type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) phenotype whereby repolarization is delayed and the QT interval is prolonged on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) [5]. In contrast, “loss-of-function” mutations in SCN5A cause a decrease in peak INa, leading to phenotypes including Brugada syndrome (BrS), cardiac conduction disturbance (CCD), congenital sick sinus syndrome (SSS), atrial standstill, AV block, sudden infant syndrome, and familial atrial fibrillation [3,6]. Some SCN5A mutations have also been found to yield mixed clinical and/or biophysical phenotypes [7,8]. These mutations can cause both an increase in late INa and a decrease in peak INa, thereby exhibiting gain-of-function and loss-of-function characteristics simultaneously.

The SCN5A mutation N406K (asparagine replaced with lysine at position 406) was reported previously in two separate patients associated with LQT3 phenotype [9,10]. Both studies reported significantly prolonged QTc interval on surface ECG and increased late INa in functional studies. One of these two studies also showed this mutant exhibited a decreased peak INa as loss-of-function [9]. Whether the N406K mutant has a mixed biophysical phenotype or not is still unknown.

We describe here a patient also haboring this N406K mutant. Using patch clamp technique, we characterized the mutated channel in HEK 293 cells and identified both “gain-of-function” and “loss-of-function” effects in this mutation. Furthermore, we applied the antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine by incubation with sodium channels and discovered that mexiletine could both elevate the decreased peak INa and inhibit the increased late INa of the SCN5A-N406K channel, providing pharmacological rescue of defective mutated sodium channel.

Methods

Study subjects

The study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Mayo Foundation Institution Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Mutation screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes as previously described and screened for the entire open-reading frames of 15 LQTS-susceptibility genes by PCR, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and direct DNA sequencing.

Plasmid construction

The N406K mutation was generated using QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and was engineered into the common splice variant of human cardiac voltage-dependent Na channel SCN5A/hNav1.5 [containing a glutamine at position 1077, we note as Q1077 (Genbank accession no. AC1377587)] in the pcDNA3 plasmid vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as previously reported [11,12]. All clones were sequenced to confirm integrity and to ensure the presence of the target mutations without other substitutions.

Heterologous expression and drug treatment

The WT- or N406K-SCN5A cDNA was transiently co-transfected with pMaxGFP cDNA, at a ratio of 5:1, into HEK293 cells with Superfect (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following manufacturer’s recommended protocol [13,14]. After 3–5 hours of incubation, the transfection reagent-DNA mixture was replaced with 3 ml of normal culture medium with or without 500 μM mexiletine, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. Before the electrophysiological recording, the plates containing the cells were removed from the 37°C incubator, growth medium was aspirated off the plates with or without drug, and the cells were treated with a 0.25% trypsin-1 mM EDTA solution (GIBCO-BRL) and transferred to a fresh tube along with 2 ml of normal culture medium and directly to the experimental chamber for electrophysiological recording [15].

Standard electrophysiological measurements

Macroscopic voltage-gated INa was measured 24 hours after transfection with the standard whole-cell patch clamp technique at a temperature of 22–24°C in HEK 293 cells expressed the GFP (“green cells”). Cells were continuously perfused with bath (extracellular) solution containing 140 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.75 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 set with NaOH). The pipette (intracellular) solution contained 120 mM CsF, 20 mM CsCl2, 5 mM EGTA and 5 mM HEPES and was adjusted to pH 7.4 with CsOH. Microelectrodes were made of borosilicate glass with a puller (P-87, Sutter Instrument Co, Novato, CA, USA) and were heat-polished using a microforge (MF-83, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). The resistances of microelectrodes ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 MΩ when filled with recording solution. Voltage clamp was generated by Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and controlled using pClamp software 9.0. The series-resistance was compensated. Membrane current data were digitized at 100 kHz, low-pass filtered at 5 kHz, and then normalized to membrane capacitance. The standard voltage clamp protocols are presented with the data and have been previously described [16].

Flow cytometry and Quantification of Cell Surface Expression

HEK293 cells were transiently co-transfected with HA-tagged SCN5A-WT or HA-tagged SCN5A-N406K respectively. After 48 hours of transfection and with or without mexiletine treatment, the transfected HEK293 cells were harvested by incubation with 0.5 mM EDTA-PBS for 10 min at 37°C and washed with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), 3%FCS, and 0.02% azide (staining medium). The FITC-conjugated anti-HA antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) incubations were performed in staining medium at 4°C and then washed by PBS supplemented with 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4) and 1% FCS. The stained cells were examined for surface expression with FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Statistical analysis

All data points are shown as the mean value and SE. Determinations of statistical significance were performed using a Student’s t-test for comparisons of two means or using one-way ANOVA for comparisons of multiple means. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characterization

The patient was found to have polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (Figure 1) and many episodes of torsades de pointes (TdP) at birth. She had a history of multiple seizures beginning at age 3 months. The QT interval was significantly prolonged (QTc = 530ms) according to surface ECG (Figure 1(b)). None of her family members had similar symptoms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ECG phenotype (A) ECG of the patient at 1 day showed the infant had polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (B) ECG of the patient at 3 months showed a prolonged QT interval (QTc = 530 ms).

Genetic analysis

Fifteen LQTS candidate genes were screened in the patient. Comprehensive open-reading frame/splice site mutational analysis for the SCN5A gene revealed a missense mutation (N406K). N406K (c. 1218C > A) was a single-base transition at nucleotide 1218 in exon 10 that resulted in the substitution of asparagine in codon 406 to lysine in S6 segment of hNav1.5 domain I (Figure 2). N406K was absent from 1300 SCN5A alleles [17] of an ethnically matched, healthy control cohort.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Topological diagram of the voltage-dependent sodium channel α-subunit hNav1.5 showing a missense mutation, N406K on the linear topology of the S6 segment at domain I of cardiac Na channel. (B) Sequence chromatogram showing normal (left panel) and a missense mutation in codon 406 of SCN5A resulting in a replacement of an asparagine by a lysine (N406K).

Current expression and gating properties of SCN5A-N406K

HEK-293 cells transiently expressing the SCN5A-WT or SCN5A-N406K mutant were voltage clamped after 24 hours of transfection. Mean peak INa densities for WT and mutant channels were compared for experiments performed on the same day in order to reduce variability. Examples of macroscopic INa traces for WT and mutant channels are shown in Figure 3 and summary data are given in Table 1. SCN5A-N406K mutant channels displayed a clear and signficant reduction of ~ 60%-67% in peak INa compared to SCN5A-WT (Figure 3(a,b), n = 18–22, p < 0.01, and Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Electrophysiological properties of SCN5A-WT and SCN5A-N406K in HEK293 cells incubation w/and w/o mexiletine. (A) Whole-cell current traces from representative experiments of each group. (B) Summary data of peak INa density of each group. Currents were elicited by test depolarization to 24ms from a holding potential of −140 mV. Symbols represent means and bars represent SEM. *, P < 0.01 versus SCN5A-WT w/o mexiletine.

Table 1.

Voltage-dependent gating parameters of each groups and mexiletine rescue of SCN5A-N406K in heterologous expression system.

  SCN5A-WT SCN5A-N406K
Peak INa (pA/pF)   n   n
\MEX(-) −243 ± 60 18 −75 ± 13* 22
MEX(+) −345 ± 84 12 −208 ± 39 13
Activation
V1/2 (mV)
       
MEX(-) −40 ± 5.3 10 −43 ± 1.0 16
MEX(+) −41 ± 1.2 9 −42 ± 1.2 8
Inactivation
V1/2 (mV)
       
MEX(-) −83 ± 4.0 8 −80 ± 1.8 9
MEX(+) −81 ± 4.0 7 −83 ± 4.0 8
Recovery        
τf (ms) 1.8 ± 0.3 7 1.2 ± 0.1 10
τs (ms) 33 ± 7.4 7 34 ± 5.5 10
As (%) 21 ± 1.0 7 24 ± 2.8 10

* P < 0.01 v.s.WT

The fitted values of voltage-dependent gating parameters represent the mean SEM for number of experiments in the parentheses. These parameters were obtained from fitting the individual experiments to the appropriate model equations. For the Boltzmanm fits the parameters of V1/2 are the midpoint of activation and inactivation, and K is the slope factor.

To investigate the gating properties of mutant Na channels, we analyzed the kinetic parameters concerning activation and inactivation of SCN5A-N406K of SCN5A-N406K and compared the data with SCN5A-WT. Peak INa at each voltage were normalized to the whole cell capacitance and plotted against test voltages (Figure 4 (a,b)). Mutant channels and WT channels showed no difference in steady-state activation midpoints, steady-state inactivation midpoints or recovery parameters (Table 1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Voltage-dependence of steady-state activation and inactivation was measured from HEK293 cells transiently expressing WT or mutant SCN5A incubation w/and w/o mexiletine. (A) SCN5A-N406K did not alter steady-state activation parameters significantly compared to SCN5A-WT. (B) SCN5A-N406K did not affect steady-state inactivation parameters significantly compared with SCN5A-WT.

Late INa of SCN5A-N406K mutant channels

Late INa for both the N406K mutant and WT channels were measured as the leak subtracted inward current remaining at the end of a 700-ms-long depolarization and expressed as a ratio of late/peak INa as previously reported [18,19]. Representative late INa traces are shown in Figure 5. Compared to WT channels, N406K mutant channels elicited significantly increased late INa by 3 fold (Figure 5 (a,b), n = 7, p < 0.01).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Late INa of SCN5A-WT and SCN5A-N406K in HEK293 cells incubation w/and w/o mexiletine. (A) Representative traces showing increased late INa associated with SCN5A-N406K compared with SCN5A-WT and the increased late INa could be inhibited by mexiletine. (B) Summary data for late INa normalized to peak INa after leak subtraction. Currents were elicited by a test depolarization pulse from −140 mV to −20mV for 700ms after the initiation of the depolarization. Symbols represent means and bars represent SEM.

SCN5A-N406K caused slower decay of INa

Time constants (Τs, Τf) were obtained from 2-exponential fits of decay phase of macroscopic INa measured at various potentials. When compared with SCN5A-WT channel, the SCN5A-N406K channel significantly increased and values through a wide range of test potentials (P < 0.05; Figure 6 (a,b)). This suggested that inactivation of INa in SCN5A-N406K was impaired.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Decay of macroscopic current. (A) Voltage dependence of inactivation slow time constants. When compared with SCN5A-WT, SCN5A-N406K showed larger slow component (Τs) values through a wide range of test potentials from −40 mV to 10 mV. (B) Voltage dependence of inactivation fast time constants. When compared with SCN5A-WT, SCN5A-N406K showed larger fast component (Τf) values through a wide range of test potentials from −40 mV to 10 mV. Both effects can be abolished by mexiletine. *P < 0.05 vs. SCN5A-WT.

Reduced Cell Surface Expression of N406K

The N406K mutation has been shown to decrease peak INa density. One explanation for this result is that N406K might not be processed correctly, as has been reported for a number of “loss-of-function” mutations. To test this idea, an extracellular HA epitope was introduced into both WT and N406K channels and their cellular localization was studied. We used flowcytometry to discover that N406K reduced SCN5A cell surface expression compared with WT. The N406K mutation was noted to decrease cell surface expression of SCN5A compared with SCN5A-WT (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Flowcytometric analysis of cell surface expression of the HA-tagged SCN5A WT and mutant channels. HEK293 cells transiently co-transfected with HA-tagged SCN5A-WT, HA-tagged SCN5A-N406K respectively. After 48 hours of transfection and with or without mexiletine treatment, the cells were harvested and stained by FITC-conjugated anti-HA antibody for quantitative the plasma membrane expression of HA-tagged channels by flow cytometry. (A-B): the cell count curve of SCN5A-WT (A) and SCN5A-N406K (B) in the absence of mexiletine (upper panel) and presence of mexiletine (Lower panel). Marker 1 (M1) was established at a point containing 5% of negative control. (C) the summary data to show the percentage of counted cells which the plasma membrane expressed HA-tagged SCN5A-WT and HA-tagged SCN5A-N406K. ***P < 0.001, compared with WT; ** P < 0.01, compared to the non-treatment control.

Effects of mexiletine on SCN5A-N406K mutant channels

HEK-293 cells expressing WT or N406K mutant channels were incubated for 48 hours with 500 μM mexiletine at physiological temperature. Currents were measured after washout of mexiletine, which was present only during the incubation period. Mexiletine treatment increased current density in both WT and mutant channels, but more markedly for N406K (Figure 3). After 48 h incubation with mexiletine, peak INa for WT channels were increased by 1.4-fold compared to non-incubation, however showing no significant difference. In contrast, SCN5A-N406K mutant channels incubated with mexiletine exhibited significantly increased peak INa by 2.8-fold compared with control non-incubated mutant channels (p < 0.01) (Figure 4). Interestingly, Late INa for SCN5A-N406K mutant channels incubated with mexiletine were markedly decreased by ~ 58%-60% compared to mutant channels without mexiletine incubation (p < 0.01) (Figure 4). Notably, the time constants (Τs, Τf) of current decay of SCN5A-N406K mutant channels after incubation with mexiletine also returned to normal levels (Figure 6 (a,b)). The decrease in cell surface expression caused by SCN5A-N406K mutants was reversed by mexiletine (Figure 7), further supporting the hypothesis that mexiletine could increase the peak INa of SCN5A N406K mutation through rescuing the trafficking defect of SCN5A-N406K.

Discussion

Major findings

In the present study, we identified the SCN5A-N406K mutation in a female patient presented with frequent episodes of TdP and marked QT interval prolongation consistent with LQT3 phenotype. Functional assays using a heterologous expression system revealed that SCN5A-N406K exhibited a “gain-of-function” effect (i.e. an increase in late INa) as well as a “loss-of-function” effect (i.e. a decrease in peak INa) which is consistent with the previous report by Kato et al [9]. Furthermore, both the “gain-of-function” effect and the “loss-of-function” effect could be reversed by mexiletine, a Class I antiarrhythmic drug.

Spencer et al [10] discovered both action potentials and calcium transients were markerly prolonged in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells expressing SCN5A-N406K. The enhanced calcium transients were thought to account for the polymorphic ventricular tachycardia the patient has at birth.

Mixed biophysical phenotype of SCN5A-N406K

The mutant channel SCN5A-N406K showed a gain of function biophysical phenotype resulting in seizures during sleep and TdP of the patient. The dramatic increased late INa found for SCN5A-N406K is typical of LQT3 [20]. The persistent Na current during action potential plateau is due to the failure of fast Na channel inactivation [8]. The remarkably slowed decay of currents observed in SCN5A-N406K mutant channels also indicated that the inactivation was impaired. Decelerated decay of macroscopic currents, stemming from delayed onset of inactivation, often occurs in combination with persistent Na current [21]. This destabilized inactivation shifts the ionic balance toward the inward current and delays repolarization, thus the action potential duration and the corresponding QT interval are prolonged consequently [22]. Unlike LQT1 and LQT2, clinical events in LQT3 tend to occur during sleep or at rest, so that LQT3 is more insidious and more lethal.

Moreover, SCN5A-N406K also exhibited decreased peak INa when expressed in HEK 293 cells, recognized as a “loss-of-function” biophysical phenotype. Such “loss-of-function” is the characteristic of Brugada syndrome (BrS) or cardiac conduction disturbance (CCD) [4]. However, there was no ECG evidence of Brugada-type ST elevation, right bundle branch block morphology or conduction disorders seen in this patient. Reduced sodium current is thought to exaggerate discrepancy in the action potential duration between the inner and outer layers of ventricular muscle, thereby introducing increased electrophysiological heterogeneity [23]. There are three common mechanisms that mutations in the SCN5A can lead to loss of function [8,15,24]: (1) incomplete transcription due to nonsense mutations that cause the channel protein not to be produced. (2) Channel proteins are produced but intracellular trafficking of the channel proteins is impaired thus membrane surface expression of the channel protein are decreased. (3) Channel proteins are produced and traffic to the surface are dysfunctional because of altered channel-gating properties, including disrupted activation, enhanced inactivation as well as impaired recovery from inactivation. In our study, N406K is a missense not nonsense mutation; mutant channels showed no difference in steady-state activation, steady-state inactivation or recovery parameters compared with WT channels. Therefore we speculate that the most probable mechanism for loss-of-function in N406K is impared trafficking of the channel proteins.

SCN5A mutations with characteristics of both phenotypes have been reported [7]. It seems paradoxical that a mutation could cause both “gain-of-function” and “loss-of-function” of sodium channel. This apparent pardox is resolved when considering the different timing of sodium current effects: “gain-of-function” usually refers to increased late INa during repolarization and “loss-of-function” generally refers to decreased peak or early INa during depolarization. The most common mixed LQT3/BrS mutation in SCN5A is probably E1784K [25]. Patients with this mutant can present with either or both prolonged QT intervals and ST segment abnormalities in an ECG. In contrary to N406K, E1784K does not alter channel expression, but rather alters channel gating (shifts the midpoint of the channel conductance-voltage relationship to more depolarized membrane potentials and accelerates the rate of channel fast inactivation) to increase late INa and decrease peak INa .The N406K mutation reported here provides another example of a mixed biophysical phenotype with “gain-of-function” for late INa and “loss-of-function” for peak INa.

Mexiletine: Dual effect on mixed biophysical phenotype of SCN5A-N406K

As “gain-of-function” SCN5A mutations induce an excess of sodium entering into the cells, sodium channel blockade represents a rational approach for gene-specific therapy in LQT3. Preliminary experimental and clinical evidences claim that mexiletine, a sodium channel blocker targeted in the inactivated state [26], could preferentially reduce the elevated late INa [27] and shorten the APD in a cellular model of LQT3 [28,29] and the QT interval in LQT3 patients [30,31]. Liu et al reported that mexiletine produces more significant QRS widening when APD prolongation is induced by late INa enhancer than IKr blocker in the rabbit ventricular wedges, which indicates that the enhanced late INa may be the consequence due to the failure of fast Na channel inactivation [32]. We have also validated the rescuing effect that mexiletine could inhibit the increased late INa of SCN5A-N406K. Interestingly, both the fast time constant (Τf) and slow time constant (Τs) values of SCN5A-N406K incubated with mexiletine were much smaller than the mutant channel incubated without mexiletine. This implied that mexiletine might block the increased late INa by correcting the imparied inactivation of the mutant channel.

In terms of “loss-of-function” SCN5A mutation, mexiletine was able to restore decreased peak INa by rescuing the proper localization of the protein [33]. In our study, the SCN5A-N406K showed a distinct reduced peak INa that was successfully rescued by mexiletine. Valdivia et al reported M1766L as the first SCN5A mutation expression defect rescued by mexiletine [34]. The M1766L mutation caused a significant decrease in peak INa density due to reduced sodium channel expression. Incubation with mexiletine partially rescued the defective expression. M1766L also showed a drastic increase in late INa, however, mexiletine did not inhibit late INa in this mutation. Moreau et al. showed two SCN5A mutations (A124D and V1378M) caused dramatically reduced peak INa density without changes in the kinetics and gating properties of the mutant channel [35]. Mexiletine could partially restore the current density of V1378M but had no effect on the current density of A124D. Incubation at 25°C and drugs targeting ER resident proteins could partially rescue the current density of these two mutations. This suggests that the effectiveness of mexiletine to rescue trafficking defects may depend on the location of the mutation.

It should be noted that the doses of mexiletine used in this study for rescue in the heterologous system are greater than therapeutic levels. Mexiletine rescue, however, could be considered a “proof of principle”, and maybe other rescue drugs could be found to rescue in concentrations nontoxic to patients.

In regard to mixed clinical phenotype/overlap syndrome, therapeutic strategies are more complex. The most frequently reported overlap of SCN5A channelopathies is the concomitant occurrence of BrS and CCD. Pharmacological treatment of BrS/CCD overlap seems less challenging, as both phenotypes are caused by the same mutation-specific loss-of-function mechanism. On the contrary, the concomitant presentation of LQT3 plus either BrS, CCD or even both may create a much more complicated situation [36], because a potentially efficient therapy should address both the inhibition of a gain-of-function effect and the rescue of a loss-of-function effect in the same mutant channel. We discovered mexiletine could elevate the reduced peak sodium current and inhibit the increased late sodium current at the same time, and partially restore the function of SCN5A-N406K mutant channel with a mixed biophysical phenotype. Whether or not mexiletine have similar rescuing effect on mixed clinical phenotype represents a possible future direction for this work.

It is important to emphasize that our study in a “minimalist” heterologous system may not reflect what occurs in the cardiomyocytes. The SCN5A complex in native tissue has many more components such as β subunits which we did not co-express in the heterologous cell model, and some interacting proteins found in native heart could have modulatory roles. Also these clones do not contain the introns or promoters that might affect expression in the cardiomyocytes. Our experiments in the heterologous system only suggest a possible biophysical phenotype that may lead to the clinical syndromes, but further studies in a more native environment of cardiomyocytes is necessary to describe the full pathogenetic pathway.

In conclusion, we describe the SCN5A-N406K mutation that exhibits both “gain-of-function” in late INa as other LQT3 mutations, and “loss-of-function” in peak INa density. Furthermore, the antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine could inhibit the increased late INa in SCN5A-N406K and restore the decreased peak INa density as well, suggesting a dual rescuing effect on mixed biophysical phenotype.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by an American Heart Association (0525806Z and 11SDG7470009 to B.-H. Tan), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7184213 to R.-M. Hu) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-71092 to J. C. Makielski and HL-42569 to M. J. Ackerman).

Acknowledgments

We thank the patient for her willingness to participate in this study.

Disclosure statement

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Bennett PB, Yazawa K, Makita N, et al. Molecular mechanism for an inherited cardiac arrhythmia. Nature. 1995;376:683–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Remme CA, Bezzina CR.. Sodium channel (dys)function and cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;28:287–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Remme CA. Cardiac sodium channelopathy associated with SCN5A mutations: electrophysiological, molecular and genetic aspects. J Physiol. 2013;591:4099–4116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu M, Yang KC, Dudley SC Jr.. Cardiac sodium channel mutations: why so many phenotypes? Nat Reviews Cardiol. 2014;11:607–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ortiz-Bonnin B, Rinne S, Moss R, et al. Electrophysiological characterization of a large set of novel variants in the SCN5A-gene: identification of novel LQTS3 and BrS mutations. Pflugers Archiv: European Journal Physiology. 2016;468:1375–1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Watanabe H, Koopmann TT, Le Scouarnec S, et al. Sodium channel beta1 subunit mutations associated with Brugada syndrome and cardiac conduction disease in humans. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2260–2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bezzina C, Veldkamp MW, van den Berg MP, et al. A single Na(+) channel mutation causing both long-QT and Brugada syndromes. Circ Res. 1999;85:1206–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Makita N. Phenotypic overlap of cardiac sodium channelopathies: individual-specific or mutation-specific? Circ Journal: Official Journal Jpn Circ Soc. 2009;73:810–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kato K, Makiyama T, Wu J, et al. Cardiac channelopathies associated with infantile fatal ventricular arrhythmias: from the cradle to the bench. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spencer CI, Baba S, Nakamura K, et al. Calcium transients closely reflect prolonged action potentials in iPSC models of inherited cardiac arrhythmia. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;3:269–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tan BH, Valdivia CR, Rok BA, et al. Common human SCN5A polymorphisms have altered electrophysiology when expressed in Q1077 splice variants. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:741–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Makielski JC, Ye B, Valdivia CR, et al. A ubiquitous splice variant and a common polymorphism affect heterologous expression of recombinant human SCN5A heart sodium channels. Circ Res. 2003;93:821–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Medeiros-Domingo A, Tan BH, Crotti L, et al. Gain-of-function mutation S422L in the KCNJ8-encoded cardiac K(ATP) channel Kir6.1 as a pathogenic substrate for J-wave syndromes. Heart rhythm. 2010;7:1466–1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tester DJ, Tan BH, Medeiros-Domingo A, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the KCNJ8-encoded Kir6.1 K(ATP) channel and sudden infant death syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Genetics. 2011;4:510–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tan BH, Valdivia CR, Song C, et al. Partial expression defect for the SCN5A missense mutation G1406R depends on splice variant background Q1077 and rescue by mexiletine. American Journal Physiology Heart Circulatory Physiology. 2006;291:H1822–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu RM, Tan BH, Orland KM, et al. Digenic inheritance novel mutations in SCN5a and SNTA1 increase late I(Na) contributing to LQT syndrome. American Journal Physiology Heart Circulatory Physiology. 2013;304:H994–H1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kapa S, Tester DJ, Salisbury BA, et al. Genetic testing for long-QT syndrome: distinguishing pathogenic mutations from benign variants. Circulation. 2009;120:1752–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tan BH, Iturralde-Torres P, Medeiros-Domingo A, et al. A novel C-terminal truncation SCN5A mutation from a patient with sick sinus syndrome, conduction disorder and ventricular tachycardia. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76:409–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Medeiros-Domingo A, Tan BH, Iturralde-Torres P, et al. Unique mixed phenotype and unexpected functional effect revealed by novel compound heterozygosity mutations involving SCN5A. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1170–1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu RM, Tan BH, Tester DJ, et al. Arrhythmogenic Biophysical Phenotype for SCN5A Mutation S1787N Depends upon Splice Variant Background and Intracellular Acidosis. PloS One. 2015;10:e0124921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zimmer T, Surber R. SCN5A channelopathies–an update on mutations and mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008;98:120–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Makielski JC. Late sodium current: A mechanism for angina, heart failure, and arrhythmia. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016;26:115–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grant AO. Electrophysiological basis and genetics of Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(Suppl 1):S3–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shinlapawittayatorn K, Dudash LA, Du XX, et al. A novel strategy using cardiac sodium channel polymorphic fragments to rescue trafficking-deficient SCN5A mutations. Circ Cardiovasc Genetics. 2011;4:500–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peters CH, Yu A, Zhu W, et al. Depolarization of the conductance-voltage relationship in the NaV1.5 mutant, E1784K, is due to altered fast inactivation. PloS One. 2017;12:e0184605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clancy CE, Zhu ZI, Rudy Y. Pharmacogenetics and anti-arrhythmic drug therapy: a theoretical investigation. American Journal Physiology Heart Circulatory Physiology. 2007;292:H66–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gao Y, Xue X, Hu D, et al. Inhibition of late sodium current by mexiletine: a novel pharmotherapeutical approach in timothy syndrome. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013;6:614–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Terrenoire C, Wang K, Tung KW, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells used to reveal drug actions in a long QT syndrome family with complex genetics. J Gen Physiol. 2013;141:61–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ma D, Wei H, Zhao Y, et al. Modeling type 3 long QT syndrome with cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5277–5286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mazzanti A, Maragna R, Faragli A, et al. Gene-specific therapy with Mexiletine reduces arrhythmic events in patients with long QT syndrome type 3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1053–1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Funasako M, Aiba T, Ishibashi K, et al. Pronounced shortening of QT interval with Mexiletine infusion test in patients with type 3 congenital long QT syndrome. Circ Journal: Official Journal Jpn Circ Soc. 2016;80:340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu G, Xue X, Gao C, et al. Synergistic effect of Dofetilide and Mexiletine on prevention of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ruan Y, Denegri M, Liu N, et al. Trafficking defects and gating abnormalities of a novel SCN5A mutation question gene-specific therapy in long QT syndrome type 3. Circ Res. 2010;106:1374–1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Valdivia CR, Ackerman MJ, Tester DJ, et al. A novel SCN5A arrhythmia mutation, M1766L, with expression defect rescued by mexiletine. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;55:279–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moreau A, Keller DI, Huang H, et al. Mexiletine differentially restores the trafficking defects caused by two brugada syndrome mutations. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Veltmann C, Barajas-Martinez H, Wolpert C, et al. Further Insights in the most common SCN5A mutation causing overlapping phenotype of long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and conduction defect. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Channels are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES