Skip to main content
EPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to EPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Environ (1994). 2017;164:309–324. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.017

Regional and Hemispheric Influences on Temporal Variability in Baseline Carbon Monoxide and Ozone over the Northeast US

Y Zhou a, H Mao a,*, K Demerjian b, C Hogrefe c, J Liu d,e
PMCID: PMC6104834  NIHMSID: NIHMS982363  PMID: 30147427

Abstract

Interannual variability in baseline carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone (O3), defined as mixing ratios under minimal influence of recent and local emissions, was studied for seven rural sites in the Northeast US over 2001 – 2010. Annual baseline CO exhibited statistically significant decreasing trends (−4.3 – −2.3 ppbv yr−1), while baseline O3 did not display trends at any site. In examining the data by season, wintertime and springtime baseline CO at the two highest sites (1.5 km and 2 km asl) did not experience significant trends. Decadal increasing trends (~2.55 ppbv yr−1) were found in springtime and wintertime baseline O3 in southern New Hampshire, which was associated with anthropogenic NOx emission reductions from the urban corridor. Biomass burning emissions impacted summertime baseline CO with ~38% variability from wildfire emissions in Russia and ~22% from Canada at five sites and impacted baseline O3 at the two high elevation sites only with ~27% variability from wildfires in both Russia and Canada. The Arctic Oscillation was negatively correlated with summertime baseline O3, while the North Atlantic Oscillation was positively correlated with springtime baseline O3. This study suggested that anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions, and meteorological conditions were important factors working together to determine baseline O3 and CO in the Northeast U.S. during the 2000s.

Keywords: Baseline CO, baseline O3, Temporal Variability, Northeast U.S., Emission, Meteorology

1. Introduction

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a product of incomplete combustion (e.g. fossil fuel, biofuel, and biomass burning) and oxidation of hydrocarbon compounds (Worden et al., 2013). In the presence of nitrogen oxides (NOx), oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and CO can lead to the photochemical formation of ozone (O3). CO is a major sink of hydroxyl radicals (OH) and O3 is a precursor of OH, and hence they significantly affect the oxidizing capacity of the troposphere (Prinn, 2003). Tropospheric CO and O3 are also serious and ubiquitous air pollutants, affecting human and natural ecosystem’s health (EPA, 2012).

CO has been used as a tracer of anthropogenic influence and fire emissions, due to its relatively unreactive chemical nature (Gratz et al., 2014; Price et al., 2004). A positive correlation between CO and O3 has been identified in summer at various locations, attributed largely to the predominant influence of photochemical processes (Mao and Talbot, 2004; Hegarty et al., 2009). Therefore, many studies have used O3-CO correlation to constrain O3 sources and transport (e.g., Mao and Talbot, 2004; Hudman et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2013). The O3-CO relationship was more complicated in other seasons due to the effects of stratospheric intrusion, dry deposition of O3, or titration of O3 by NO (Mao and Talbot, 2004; Voulgarakis et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013).

The United States has made enormous efforts to control ambient mixing ratios of criteria pollutants since the 1970s (EPA, 2012). Nationally, annual second maximum 8 h average mixing ratios of CO decreased by 52%, and annual mean mixing ratios of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) declined by 33% over 2001 – 2010 (EPA, 2012). Although anthropogenic emissions have decreased in Europe and North America, emissions in China and India have increased. Biomass burning emissions vary both spatially and temporally (Granier et al., 2011). The lifetime of CO and O3 in the free troposphere is ~2 months and ~20 days, respectively (Price et al., 2004; Stevenson et al., 2006). Thus, transport of CO, other O3 precursors, and O3 from an upwind region as well as amounts produced in transit could affect downwind baseline CO and O3 levels (Oltmans et al., 2008; Pollack et al., 2013). It remains unclear how opposing changes in emissions over North America, Europe and Asia have globally affected baseline CO and O3, which are defined as mixing ratios of CO and O3 under minimal influence of recent and local emissions (Chan and Vet, 2010; HTAP, 2010).

The terms “background” and “baseline” have often been used interchangeably, and a few studies discussed the difference (HTAP, 2010; Huang et al., 2015). The term “background” was used in modeling studies that estimated the atmospheric mixing ratio of a compound determined by natural sources only, while the term “baseline” was obtained from measurement records by removing data affected by local influences (Chan and Vet, 2010). Various methods have been utilized to diagnose baseline conditions, including using measurements at remote sites, analysis of the probability distribution of pollutants, correlations with reactive nitrogen oxides, or isentropic back-trajectories (e.g., Lin et al., 2000; Derwent et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2012). Air masses with monthly to annual low percentile values of CO are commonly considered baseline air (e.g., Lin et al., 2000; Mao and Talbot, 2012). The monthly 10th percentile value of afternoon CO was defined as baseline CO in this study for the lower elevation sites while the monthly 50th percentile value of afternoon CO was used at high elevation sites. Baseline O3 was then estimated as the monthly median of the afternoon O3 data corresponding to CO mixing ratios below the baseline CO level (Lin et al., 2000). It should be noted that the monthly baseline CO and O3 defined here excluded the influence of processes on hourly to daily time scales (DeBell et al., 2004; Honrath et al., 2004; Dutkiewicz et al., 2011b).

Trends in baseline O3 have been investigated for northern hemispheric mid-latitude regions, such as North America, Europe, and Asia, and no consistent trends have been found (e.g., Chan, 2009; Cui et al., 2011; Logan et al., 2012; Oltmans et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2012; Cooper et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2008). However, decreasing trends were found in baseline CO and CO concentrations in rural areas since the end of the 1980s (e.g., Hallock-Waters et al., 1999; Novelli et al., 2003; Duncan and Logan, 2008). Interpretation of long-term trends is difficult because interannual variability in emissions, climate, and photochemistry are intricately interwoven (Hess and Lamarque, 2007). CO is a long-lived tracer of combustion and using changes in CO, one can estimate continental influences on O3 globally (Hudman et al., 2009). However, only a few studies (Kumar et al., 2013; Gratz et al., 2014) investigated the long-term trends in baseline CO and O3 together. Kumar et al. (2013) found that trends of −0.31 and −0.21 ppbv yr−1 for CO and O3, respectively, at the Pico Mountain Observatory could be attributed to the North American anthropogenic emission declines over 2001 – 2010, and that climate change may have affected the intercontinental transport of O3. Gratz et al. (2014) found that the springtime median mixing ratio of O3 increased at a rate of 0.76 ppbv yr−1 at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory over 2004 – 2013, while median CO decreased at a rate of −3.1 ppbv yr−1. Overall, causes for temporal variability in both baseline O3 and CO have not been adequately explained.

Although a number of studies have been conducted to understand the distributions of surface CO and O3 in the Northeast US and their controlling mechanisms (e.g. Bae et al., 2011; DeBell et al., 2004; Mao and Talbot, 2004; Schwab et al., 2009), little work has been done on baseline CO and O3 together using long-term measurement data for the region, in particular using the data from the seven sites in this study. Here, we aimed to examine the trends in baseline CO and O3 as well as interannual and seasonal variation at seven rural sites in the Northeast U.S. over 2001 – 2010 and investigate their potential association with emissions, dynamics, and O3 photochemistry.

2. Methods and data

2.1. Measurement data

Our study used long-term observations at seven rural sites in the Northeast US. Five are located in rural New Hampshire (NH) and two are in rural New York (NY) State. These sites are 100 – 200 km away from major sources (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The Appledore Island (AI) site is located in the marine boundary layer, ~11 km offshore in the Gulf of Maine, while the Thompson Farm (TF) site is located in an open lot surrounded by agricultural fields and mixed vegetation, ~21 km away from the coastline. The Castle Spring (CS) and Pack Monadnock (PM) sites are ~75 km to the northwest and west of TF, respectively. These four sites are on the eastside of the Appalachian Mountain Range. The Mountain Washington Observatory (MWO) and Whiteface Mountain (WFM) sites are located on the summit of the Appalachians, ~2 km and 1.5 km a.s.l., respectively. The Pinnacle State Park (PSP) site is located on the west side of the Appalachians.

Table 1.

Ground stations with geographical coordinates and measurement periods.

Site Latitude Longitude Elevation Measurement Period (CO) Measurement Period (O3) Time Resolution
(min)
Appledore Island (AI)* 42.97°N 70.62°W 18 m Jul, 2001–Jul, 2011 Jul, 2002–Mar, 2012 1
Thompson Farm (TF) 43.11°N 70.95°W 23m Apr, 2001–Jul, 2011 Apr, 2001–Aug, 2010 1
Mt. Washington (MWO) 44.27°N 71.30°W 1917m Apr, 2001–Apr, 2009 Apr, 2001–May, 2010 1
Castle Spring (CS) 43.75°N 71.35°W 396m Apr, 2001–Jun, 2008 Apr, 2001–May, 2008 1
Pack Monadnock (PM) 42.86°N 71.88°W 698m Jun, 2004–Jul, 2011 Jul, 2004–Oct, 2008 1
Whiteface Mountain (WFM) 44.40°N 73.90°W 1484 m Jan, 1996–Dec, 2010 Jan, 1996–Dec, 2010 60
Pinnacle State Park (PSP) 42.09°N 77.21°W 504 m Jan, 1997–Dec, 2010 Jan, 1997–Dec, 2010 60
*

CO at AI was measured seasonally from May to September over 2001 – 2006 and year-round over 2007 – 2011, and O3 was measured seasonally from May to September over 2002 – 2007 and year-round over 2008 – 2011.

Note: The time in all of the datasets was expressed in coordinated universal time (UTC), i.e. local time +5 h for non-daylight saving time and +4 h for daylight saving time (March–November).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of the Northeast U.S. The seven measurement sites used in the study are marked with black dots.

Measurements of CO, O3, wind direction, wind speed, and relative humidity at AI, CS, MWO, PM, and TF were conducted continuously by the University of New Hampshire AIRMAP Observing Network (http://www.eos.unh.edu/observatories/). All measurements have undergone rigorous quality controls as described in Section S1 in the Supplement. Measurements at PSP and WFM were operated by the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at State University of New York at Albany (Section S1). Hourly data of solar radiation flux at the Harvard Forest was downloaded from http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/.

2.2. Quantification of baseline CO and O3

The local afternoon time window (18:00 – 24:00 UTC) was selected to avoid including the data representing nighttime depletion of O3 due to dry deposition and titration (Talbot et al., 2005), and the afternoon well-mixed planetary boundary layer (PBL) best includes the influences of local and distant sources. The monthly 10th percentile mixing ratio of CO at AI, CS, PM, TF, and PSP was used to represent baseline CO levels. As MWO and WFM are located atop the mountains, they are far less impacted by local anthropogenic emissions (Dutkiewicz et al., 2011a). Therefore, monthly median values of CO were selected at MWO and WFM to represent baseline levels there. To determine baseline O3 levels for individual sites, we first created a subset of O3 data corresponding to CO mixing ratios below monthly 10th percentile values at AI, CS, PM, TF, PSP and monthly median values at MWO and WFM. The monthly median value of this subset at each site was then defined as the site’s baseline O3. As the datasets used for this study started in 1997 at PSP and 1996 at WFM, comparison in baseline CO and O3 were made between the time period of 2001 – 2010 and the years prior to that at these two sites.

2.3. Global datasets of climate indices, wildfires, meteorology, and tropospheric O3

The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index is a measure of the intensity of NAO, which is defined based on the leading empirical orthogonal function of the normalized sea level pressure difference between the subtropical high and the subpolar low (Barnston and Livezey, 1987). The Arctic Oscillation (AO) index was obtained by projecting the daily 1000 hPa geopotential height anomalies poleward of 20°N onto the loading pattern of the AO (Thompson and Wallace, 2000). The monthly climate index values of NAO and AO used in this study were obtained from the Climate Prediction Center of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) (http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/telecontents.shtml).

The Global Fire Emission Data (GFED) combines satellite information of fire activities and vegetation productivities and contains gridded monthly burned area and fire emissions with 0.5°×0.5° horizontal resolution since 1997. GFED 3 (http://www.globalfiredata.org/) was used in this study to estimate the biomass burning emissions of CO over Russia, Canada, California, and Alaska. Monthly mean global CO columns with 1°× 1° resolution obtained from the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument on the satellite Terra (https://www2.acd.ucar.edu/mopitt/) were used over grids containing Russia, Canada, Alaska, and California, when wildfire CO emissions in these grids calculated from GFED were larger than 1 g m−2month−1.

Monthly wind, geopotential height, temperature, relative humidity, and potential vorticity (PV) (http://rda.ucar.edu/) with 2.5°×2.5° resolution from the NCEP National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) were used for meteorological conditions and for identifying stratospheric intrusion. The dataset representing O3 of stratospheric origin (Liu et al. 2013, ftp://es-ee.tor.ec.gc.ca/pub/ftpdt/Stratospheric%20Climatology/), was also used to verify the contribution of stratospheric O3 to the two mountain sites and the decadal trends there. This dataset included monthly amounts of stratospheric O3 from the surface to 26 km altitude with 5°× 5°× 1 km spatial resolution from the 1960s to the 2000s.

2.4. Mid-latitude cyclone identification and tracking

Many algorithms have been developed since the 1970s to identify mid-latitude cyclones (Hu et al., 2004; Murazaki and Hess, 2006; Racherla and Adams, 2008). The algorithm developed by Bauer and Del Genio (2006) was adopted in this study to track the sea level pressure minima with the following two steps. First, the local minimum was searched for by a 2 grids × 2 grids matrix. Second, the local (within 720 km) minimum was searched for in the next time step, assuming that a cyclone cannot move faster than 120 km h−1, the same criterion used by Bauer and Del Genio (2006). If more than one local minimum was found, the point with the lowest sea level pressure was designated as the center of a cyclone. Two more criteria were applied, its duration > 24 h and central pressure ≤ 1020 hPa. Long-term cyclone frequency statistics were calculated for the Northeast US (37.5 – 47.5°N, 67.5 – 82.5°W). Six hourly mean sea level pressure data with a spatial resolution of 2.5°×2.5° from NCEP-DOE Reanalysis 2 (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis2.html) were used in this analysis.

2.5. Statistical methods

The open-air package in the statistical programming language R 3.0.2 was used to determine the statistical significance of a rate of change. Trends in baseline CO and O3 in ppbv yr−1 were reported using SenTheil slopes from non-parametric Mann–Kendall analysis with 90% confidence intervals. Pearson correlation was computed to determine the relation between variables (e.g. baseline CO, baseline O3, NAO index, relative humidity). The Student t test was conducted to verify statistical significance (α = 0.10).

To quantify the contribution of biomass burning emissions over an area to a location of interest, we applied the linear regression model (Wotawa et al., 2001; Jaffe et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2016) using:

CO=a0+a1E+ε (1)

where CO is the mixing ratio of baseline CO at each site, E the total CO column over the area, a0 the intercept value, a1 the slope value, and ε the error. The combined effect of biomass burning emissions over two areas was computed using:

CO=b0+b1E1+b2E2+ε (2)

where b0, b1, b2, and ε are regression parameters, and E1 and E2 the total CO column over the two areas.

3. Characteristics of temporal variations in Baseline CO and O3

Time series of baseline CO and O3 both showed annual maxima in spring and minima in fall during the entire study period at most sites, except baseline CO at WFM over 2001 – 2010 (Fig. 2). Baseline CO showed averaged annual maxima ranging from 149 to 189 ppbv uniformly in March and minima ranging from 103 to 142 ppbv in varying months between August and October at AI, CS, MWO, PM, TF, and PSP from 2001 to 2010 (Figs. 2a-b). Baseline O3 at all sites displayed very similar averaged annual maxima, ranging from 47 to 51 ppbv, in April and averaged annual minima varying between 28 and 37 ppbv, in August – October over 2001 – 2010 (Figs. 2c-d). Baseline CO at WFM had an average annual maximum (171 ppbv) in February and minimum (104 ppbv) in July over 1996 – 2000 (Fig. 2b). Note that, over 2001 – 2010, the pattern of annual cycles at WFM was the opposite with annual maxima averaged 144 ppbv in July and minima 103 ppbv in December (Fig. 2b), which was also found in Dutkiewicz et al. (2011a). The change of the pattern of annual cycles occurred in 2000, when the annual averaged mixing ratio was extremely low (70 ppbv) and no distinct annual cycle was found in this year. The unusual annual cycle of baseline CO at WFM might be caused by combined effects of mountain meteorology, reduced nationwide emissions, and less exposure to reduced anthropogenic emissions in Montreal (Section S2; Dutkiewicz et al. 2011a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Monthly baseline CO (ppbv) at (a) AI, CS, PM, TF, and PSP, and (b) MWO and WFM. Monthly baseline O3 (ppbv) at (c) AI, CS, PM TF, and PSP, and (d) MWO and WFM.

The Mann-Kendall test suggested that baseline CO decreased significantly at rates ranging from −2.5 to −4.3 ppbv yr−1 (p < 0.01) at MWO, PM, TF, PSP, and WFM over 2001 – 2010 (Table 2). Unlike for baseline CO, the Mann–Kendall test suggested no significant trends in baseline O3 during the time period of 2001 – 2010 at all sites and the time period prior to 2001 at PSP and WFM (Table 2). Baseline CO at CS exhibited an increasing trend of 2.8 ppbv yr−1 over April 2001 – June 2008. Prior to May 2003, the mixing ratio of baseline CO at CS was similar to that at TF. After May 2003, baseline CO at CS was ~30 ppbv higher than that at TF (Fig. 2a), resulting in the overall increasing trend. No possible causes were found for such increases.

Table 2.

Trends (ppbv yr−1) of baseline CO and O3 in spring, summer, fall, and winter. p-values are in the parentheses. Boldfaced numbers indicate p-value < 0.10.

Spring Summer Fall Winter Annual
Site Period CO O3 CO O3 CO O3 CO O3 CO O3
AI 2002–2010 0.8(0.66) −3.1(0.07)
CS 2001–2008 3.4(0.06) 0.9(0.65) 2.4(0.19) −2.9(0.14) 1.1(0.57) 1.5(0.45) 6.1(<0.01) 0.4(0.86) 2.8 (<0.01) 0.8 (0.39)
MWO 2001–2009 −13.2(0.51) −0.7(0.71) −4.5(0.01) −4.7(0.01) −4.4(0.01) −0.9(0.64) −1.7(0.36) 0.1(0.98) −2.3 (<0.01) −0.7 (0.42)
PM 2005–2010 −6.5(<0.01) −1.9(0.39) −5.5(<0.01) −3.5(0.14) −4.2(0.05) −3.4(0.11) −5.5(0.01) 0.1(1.00) −3.5 (<0.01) −0.8 (0.43)
TF 2001–2010 −3.7(0.02) 2.4(0.10) −4.5(<0.01) −0.1(0.94) −3.2(0.04) 0.2(0.90) −4.8(<0.01) 2.7(0.10) −2.5 (<0.01) 0.8 (0.29)
PSP* 1997–2000 - - - - - - - - −3.1(0.01) −1.2(0.32)
PSP 2001–2010 −4.5(<0.01) 1.3(0.43) −4.3(<0.01) −0.8(0.56) −4.2(0.01) −1.9(0.23) −3.9(0.02) −0.7(0.68) −4.3 (<0.01) −0.7 (0.40)
WFM 1996–2000 −7.7(<0.01) 1.3(0.62) −8.8(<0.01) −0.3(0.92) −5.7(0.02) −0.8(0.77) 0.2(2.38) 0.7(0.84) −5.6(<0.01) 0.3(0.80)
WFM 2001–2010 −0.5(0.78) 0.4(0.83) −1.9(0.23) −4.7(<0.01) −6.4(<0.01) 0.5(0.76) −2.1(0.21) −1.3(0.45) −2.8 (<0.01) −0.9 (0.27)
*

Trends at PSP were not computed for each season over 1997 – 2000, as only four-year datasets were available.

Trends in seasonal baseline CO and O3 were also computed and were found to be variable at each site (Table 2). In spring and winter, baseline CO at PM, TF, and PSP decreased significantly at rates of −6.5 – −3.7 ppbv yr−1 over 2001 – 2010 while no significant decreasing trends at the two highest sites MWO and WFM (Table 2). In spring and winter, TF was the only site where baseline O3 increased significantly at rates of 2.4 ppbv yr−1 and 2.7 ppbv yr−1, respectively, while other sites showed no trends. Figure 3 further underscored large difference in variability of baseline CO and O3 between sites in spring and summer. Emphasis was placed on spring and summer, when strong intercontinental transport and photochemistry involving O3 and CO (Mao and Talbot, 2004) as well as exceedances of NAAQS tended to occur. In summer 2003, baseline CO and O3 reached the decadal maxima at most sites, except baseline O3 at PSP (Fig. 3c-d). Springtime baseline CO at TF also showed the largest value (170 ppbv) in 2003. In summer 2004, the second largest baseline CO mixing ratio of the decade (2001 – 2010) was found at TF and WFM. Both baseline CO and O3 were the lowest of the decade (2001 – 2010) at AI, PM, TF, and PSP in summer 2009.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Springtime averaged baseline (a) CO and (b) O3 and summertime averaged baseline (c) CO and (d) O3 at each site.

4. Discussion

According to the findings in the previous section, the following questions need to be addressed:

  • 1)

    What factors drove the interannual variations of baseline CO and O3? Did their influences vary from spring to summer? Which factor(s) was (were) dominant in each season?

  • 2)

    Why were there decreasing trends in baseline CO and yet no trends in baseline O3?

  • 3)

    Why did baseline CO at WMO and WFM exhibit no trends in spring and winter? and

  • 4)

    Why did baseline O3 at TF show significant increasing trends in spring and winter?

The above questions were addressed in terms of changing anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions, stratospheric intrusion, meteorological conditions, and their geographical locations. Since the causes for the unusually high values at CS after May 2003 are unknown, baseline CO at CS was not included in the following discussion.

4.1. Impact of wildfires in summer

Studies (Hecobian et al., 2011; Oltmans et al., 2010) suggested that biomass burning effluents from Russia and Canada flowed into North America. In addition, California and Alaska were two US states with considerable fire emissions of CO, which reportedly impacted the air quality over North America (McKendry et al., 2011; Real et al., 2007). Fire emissions of CO in summer were estimated using the GFED dataset and MOPITT retrievals (Figs. 4a and b). The GFED data suggested that massive wildfires occurred in Russia in 1998, 2002, 2003, and 2008 with annual CO emissions of 64.0, 42.1, 71.1, and 35.8 Tg, respectively. The top three annual fire emissions of CO in Canada were 23.3 Tg in 1998, 17.4 Tg in 2004 and 18.3 Tg in 2010. In Alaska, the largest fires occurred in 2004 with 13.1 Tg CO emitted, while in California the largest were 1.3 Tg in 2008. Over 2001 – 2010, the total CO emissions from wildfires in Russia, Canada, Alaska and California varied from 19.9 to 84.3 Tg, with the lowest and the highest in 2007 and 2003, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) CO emissions from biomass burning based on GFED dataset. (b) Total CO columns based on MOPITT retrievals over Russia (black), Alaska (red), Canada (blue), and California (magenta).

Monthly MOPITT total CO columns were found to be significantly correlated with monthly GFED fire emissions of CO for the four areas. The correlation coefficients were 0.89, 0.81, 0.81, and 0.84 (p < 0.01 for the four values) for Russia, Canada, California, and Alaska, respectively, suggesting that the variability in total column CO over those areas was dominated by that of fire emissions. Based on the linear regression model described in Section 2.5, it was found that the contributions of fire emissions from Russia and Canada to the variability of summertime baseline CO at the 5 sites averaged between 38% and 22%, respectively (Table 3), and their combined contribution averaged 41%. Contributions from Alaska and California were negligible at these five sites. Wotawa et al. (2001) used the same method and found that 14% of the CO variability in the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere in the 1990s can be explained by boreal forest area burnt in North America, 53% by area burnt in Russia, and 63% by combination of both. Globally, there is approximately 1 billion ha closed forest in the boreal region, about two thirds of which is situated in Russia (Harden et al., 2000). CO emissions from wildfires in Russia and Canada contributed 49.5 and 29.6%, respectively, to the total CO emissions from wildfires in Northern Hemispheric midlatitudes (30 – 90°N). Understandably, baseline CO was well correlated with wildfires in Russia and Canada at most sites, except at PSP.

Table 3.

The contributions, in r2, of CO emissions from wildfires over Russia, Canada, Alaska, and California to variation (r2) in baseline CO at each site. The combined effect of wildfire emissions over Russia and Canada was also computed. Boldfaced numbers indicate p-value < 0.10.

Russia Canada Alaska California Combined
r2 p r2 p r2 p r2 p r2 p
AI 0.39 0.01 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.19 0.12 0.21 0.41 0.02
CS 0.41 0.01 0.17 0.09 0.06 0.38 <0.01 0.92 0.41 0.02
MWO 0.41 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.77 <0.01 0.88 0.43 0.02
TF 0.64 0.01 0.40 0.05 0.01 0.80 0.03 0.52 0.65 0.01
PSP 0.11 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.27 <0.01 0.93 0.16 0.27
WFM 0.32 0.01 0.32 0.01 <0.01 0.90 0.01 0.69 0.38 0.03
Mean 0.38 0.22 <0.05 <0.03 0.41

Note: PM was not included due to insufficient data

The second largest summertime baseline CO mixing ratio of the decade (2001 – 2010) was found in summer 2004 at TF and WFM (Fig. 3c). During this summer, Alaska saw its decadal maximum (13.1 Tg) fire emissions of CO, Canada its second largest (17.4 Tg) of the decade, whereas Russia had below average emissions (Fig. 4a). The circulation pattern over Alaska and Canada appeared to be anomalous in summer 2004, with the stronger than normal high pressure system (Fig. 5a–c) leading to the driest (82% relative humidity) and warmest (12°C) summer of the decade (Fig. 5d). Such weather conditions are conducive to the occurrence of wildfires. In summer 2004, CO emissions from wildfires in Russian, Canada, and Alaska contributed 16%, 48.5% and 36.5%, respectively, to the Northern Hemispheric total, a stark contrast to 49.5%, 10.6%, and 29.6% on decadal average. Moreover, the predominant contributions from Canadian and Alaskan fire emissions in summer 2004 appeared to be closely linked to the unusual transport to the Northeast US via the anomalously strong northeasterly component of the high pressure system over Alaska and southwestern Canada (Fig. 5c). The combination of these two factors resulted in efficient transport of massive fire emissions of CO from Alaska and Canada.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Geopotential height at the 850 hPa pressure level during summer in (a) 2001–2010 (b) 2004. (c) The difference of geopotential height at 850 hPa between summer 2004 and the 10-year average. (d) The annual surface temperature and relative humidity over Alaska and southwestern Canada (55°N – 70°N, 110°W – 160°W) over summer 2001 – 2010. Red stars indicated the area of the study sites. (Source: NCEP/NCAR reanalysis)

Since wildfires provide a substantial source of NOx and VOCs, O3 is expected to form in fire plumes. Corresponding to the largest fire emissions in summer 2003 in Russia (Fig. 4a), baseline CO in summer at all sites reached the decadal maxima, and baseline O3 was the highest of all summers at AI, CS, MWO, TF, and WFM (Fig. 3c-d). Previous studies also found enhanced tropospheric O3 levels over North America in summer 2003 and spring 2008, which was attributed to biomass burning in Siberia (Oltmans et al., 2010; Jaffe et al., 2004). The enhanced O3 from Canadian boreal forest fires was reported to vary from being insignificant to substantial (Alvarado et al., 2010; Mckeen et al., 2002). Linear regression analysis suggested that contributions of fire emissions from Russia and Canada to the variability of summertime baseline O3 at MWO were 27% (p = 0.07) over 2001 – 2010. No significant contribution to summertime baseline O3 was found at other sites. On a decadal scale, wildfires appeared to have a significant impact on baseline O3 at high elevated sites only, where the effect of continental to intercontinental transport was more important (Jonson et al., 2010).

Mann-Kendall trend analysis indicated that CO emissions from wildfires in Russia decreased at a rate of −0.51 Tg yr−1 (p = 0.10) and no trends were found in other regions. Hence, the decreasing trend of biomass burning emissions in Russia likely contributed to the decreasing trends in summertime baseline CO and O3 in the Northeast U.S. (Table 2).

4.2. Meteorological conditions

4.2.1. Impact of cyclone activity and AO in summer

Midlatitudinal cyclone frequency ranks highly among meteorological variables that can impact regional air quality. It affects not only boundary layer ventilation, humidity, solar radiation, and temperature but also general circulations of the regional atmosphere (Leibensperger et al., 2008). Time series of summertime counts of cyclones in the Northeast US showed strong interannual variability (Fig. 6a). Our calculated numbers of cyclones were consistent with the results for the same years in Leibensperger et al. (2008) and Bauer and Del Genio (2006). The counts of cyclones in 2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, and 2010 were greater than 12, the average of summer 2001–2010. Summer 2009 experienced the largest number of cyclones (20) passing the Northeast US over 2001 – 2010.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) Counts of cyclones in the Northeast U.S. (black) and the AO index (blue) in summer. (b) Geopotential height at 500 hPa from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data during summer 2001 – 2010. (c) The difference of 500 hPa geopotential height between years with strong (2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, and 2010) and weak (2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2007) cyclone activities. (d) The difference between geopotential height at 500 hPa in summer 2009 and the 10-year means. (e) The difference between sea level pressure in summer 2009 and the 10-year means. (f) Time series of summertime baseline CO (black) and O3 (red) averaged over all seven sites, and CO emissions (blue) from wildfires in Russia and Canada. Dashed lines indicate the 10-year means. Red stars indicate the area of the study sites.

In summer, midlatitudinal cyclones tend to move around the 500 hPa vortex, which is located over the cold Arctic Ocean with broadly symmetric flow around it (Serreze et al., 2007). On the North American side, high latitudinal flow on the 500 hPa pressure level has a southerly component, which tends to steer systems away from the Arctic Ocean (Fig. 6b). Composite analyses of years of strong (2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, and 2010) vs. weak (2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2007) cyclone activities revealed distinct differences in regional to large scale circulation (Fig. 6c). Results showed a pronounced positive difference of ~35 gpm centered over Baffin Island (north of the Northeast US) and a negative difference of ~25 gpm centered over the Northeast US (Fig. 6c). This difference was related to the negative phase of AO (Fig. 6a), when Arctic lows and westerlies are weaker, leading to more frequent cold-air outbreaks down to Eurasia and the US (Hess and Lamarque, 2007) and ultimately low baseline CO and O3 there.

A case in point was summer 2009 with the largest cyclone count (20) and the strongest negative AO phase (−0.92) of the decade (Fig. 6a), and baseline CO and O3 were the lowest of the decade at AI, PM, TF, and PSP. Consistent with earlier results, negative anomalies of 500 hPa geopotential height up to ~−60 gpm were found over the North American continent and positive anomalies up to ~65 gpm centered near the pole (Fig. 6d). The sea level pressure field (Fig. 6e) featured a pronounced mean low over southern Canada, and streamlines suggested an unusually strong northeasterly component. Indeed, the frequency distribution of wind direction at each site (not shown) suggested more frequent occurrence of northeasterly wind (22.5–112.5°) during 2009, with 21% at PM, 9% at MWO, 42% at TF, 11% at PSP, and 13% at WFM, compared to 10%, 5%, 12%, 6%, 8% averaged respectively during other summers. Decadal trends were computed for summertime cyclones and AO index, and no significant trends were found.

It should be noted that of all the sites, significant negative correlation was found between counts of cyclones and baseline O3 only at PSP (r = −0.56, p = 0.05). PSP was the only site that did not seem to be significantly affected by the Russian and Canadian wildfire emissions during the 2000s (Section 4.1). Compared to other sites, PSP had the lowest wind speed of 0.47 m s−1 (Fig. 7a), which appeared to be consistent with the position of PSP relative to the pressure systems year-round (Fig. 7b–e). The climatological seasonal composites of sea level pressure suggest that PSP is located either on the periphery of the subtropical high in summer-fall and on the periphery and near the axis of the U.S. east coast trough in fall-winter, where wind tends to be the weakest. In comparison, other sites are either located at the top of the boundary layer, and/or tend to be positioned within the U.S. east coast trough, more directly under the influence of the westerly wind often facilitating global transport. This very dynamic characteristic could cast a predominant influence of synoptic systems over the site, e.g., the Bermuda High and cold frontal passages. As commonly known, high mixing ratios of O3 in the Northeast often occurred under summertime stagnant, clear sky conditions associated with the Bermuda High (Logan, 1989; Hegarty et al., 2007), while low O3 was often linked to cold fronts which sweep out polluted air leaving much cooler and cleaner air in the Northeast (Leibensperger et al., 2008). Conceivably, with more frequent cyclones passing the Northeast US, lower concentrations of baseline CO/O3 would be expected, and the predominant effect of such synoptic systems could lead to anticorrelation between the baseline CO/O3 levels and cyclone activities. However, significant correlation was not found between baseline CO and counts of cyclones at PSP. This indicates that, for CO at PSP, global transport could be as important as regional transport facilitated by processes such as cyclones, whereas O3 has a shorter lifetime and it was thus more sensitive to synoptic systems. The unique characteristics of baseline CO at PSP warrant further study.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

(a) Annual surface wind speed with yearly variation at each site over summer 2001 – 2010. Northeast U.S. sea surface pressure (hPa) in (b) spring, (c) summer, (d) fall, and (e) winter averaged over 1980 – 2010. Red stars indicate the location of PSP.

4.2.2. Impact of NAO in spring (March and April)

Wildfires in March and April were scarce, with mean CO emissions of 1.78 Tg in Russia and 0.004 Tg in Canada over 2001 – 2010, negligible compared to emissions during the fire season (May – September). To focus on the impact of large-scale circulation on baseline CO and O3 in spring, the May data were excluded to avoid the effect of biomass burning. Springtime baseline O3 at each site showed strong and consistent interannual variation up to 10 ppbv, and site average baseline O3 mixing ratios exceeded the decadal average 46.5 ppbv in 2001, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, and was below average in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2009 (Fig. 8a).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

(a) Baseline O3 and the NAO index averaged in March and April. The thick orange line indicates the baseline O3 averaged over the seven sites and the thick dark blue line indicates the mean value 46.5 ppbv over 2001 – 2010. (b) Averaged daytime (18:00 – 24:00 UT) relative humidity at each site and daily maximum solar radiation flux at the Harvard Forest in March and April. (c) Averaged wind speed (> 2 m s−1) from the west (247.5° – 337.5°) and the NAO index in March and April.

The difference of 850 hPa geopotential height between the lower and higher O3 years is shown in Figure 9a. There was a pronounced difference up to 40 gpm in the Bermuda/Azores high and ~−40 gpm in the Icelandic low, resulting in stronger gradient flow between the two pressure systems indicative of the positive phase of NAO. Over 2001 – 2010, the NAO index was significantly positive in 2002, 2004, 2007, 2009 and negative in 2001, 2005, 2008, 2010, which corresponded mostly to the years of below and above the decadal average baseline O3, respectively. Significant negative correlation was found between the NAO index and baseline O3 at each site (Table 4). No significant trend was found in the NAO index over 2001 – 2010.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

The difference of (a) geopotential height (m) and streamlines at 850-hPa and (b) PV (10−9 m2 s−1 kg) at 350 K between the low O3 years (2002, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2009) and high O3 years (2001, 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2010). The red star or box indicated the study region.

Table 4.

Correlation coefficient (r) and p-value between the pairs of variables in March and April over 2001 – 2010. Boldfaced numbers indicate p-value < 0.10.

Pair of Variables CS MWO PM TF PSP WFM Harvard Forest
NAO index vs Baseline O3 −0.75 (0.03) −0.68 (0.03) −0.81 (0.03) −0.81 (<0.01) −0.58 (0.06) −0.51 (0.10) -
NAO index vs Baseline O3* - - - - −0.49 (0.04) −0.48 (0.04) -
NAO index vs Baseline CO −0.24 (0.30) −0.51 (0.12) −0.06 (0.46) 0.30 (0.22) −0.14 (0.36) −0.16 (0.34) -
Relative humidity vs NAO index 0.85 (0.02) - - 0.63 (0.08) 0.23 (0.26) 0.40 (0.13) -
Solar radiation flux vs NAO index - - - - - - −0.64 (0.04)
Surface wind speed vs NAO index 0.68 (0.06) 0.76 (0.02) - 0.57 (0.09) 0.44 (0.12) - -
*

The correlation between baseline O3 and NAO index was computed at PSP over 1997 – 2010 and WFM over 1996 – 2010.

The negative correlation between NAO and baseline O3 could be a result of multiple factors, such as reduced solar flux, enhanced continental export of O3 produced in North America, and less frequent/weak stratospheric intrusion. Significant correlation was found between relative humidity and the NAO index at sites near the Northeast US coast (CS and TF), while the correlation was weaker at inland, elevated sites (PSP and WFM) (Table 4 and Fig. 8b). During a positive NAO year, the mean North Atlantic storm track parallels the eastern North American coastline before extending northeastward to near Iceland (Rogers, 1997). This storm track and its associated moisture transport and convergence could lead to relatively wet conditions near the eastern US coast and conversely dry conditions during a negative NAO year (Archambault et al., 2008; Hurrell, 1995). Significant negative correlation was found between NAO index and solar radiation flux at the Harvard Forest (Table 4), which was only ~45 km southwest from PM. No significant correlation was found in other seasons. This indicates more cloudiness, consequently reduced solar radiation flux near the surface and subsequently less O3 production.

North American continental export facilitated by NAO could also affect baseline O3 over the Northeast US. Annual wind speed from the west-northwest (247.5 – 337.5°, the prevailing winds at each site) was calculated at the study sites (Fig. 8c). Positive correlation was found between surface wind and NAO index at MWO and TF (Table 4). During a positive NAO phase, the anticyclonic circulation off the U.S. east coast and the cyclonic circulation across the North Atlantic were amplified with a northward shift (Rogers, 1997; Eckhardt et al, 2004) and hence stronger surface wind could be found near 50°N across the North Atlantic basin (Hess and Lamarque, 2007). The O3 produced over the Northeast US was less likely accumulated in the region and was more likely transported faster off the continent and across the Atlantic Ocean. This speculation was consistent with the positive anomalies of O3 observed over northwestern Europe (Christoudias et al., 2012).

Stratospheric intrusions and NAO could be linked, as the U.S. east coast trough induces descending air on its tailing side, which can cause tropopause folding with stratospheric air mixing downward into the troposphere. One of the physical characteristics of stratospheric air is high values of PV. The difference of PV between positive NAO years and negative NAO years exhibited negative anomalies ~ −0.6 × 10−9 m2s−1kg over the Northeast US (Fig. 9b), suggesting that positive NAO was related to less stratospheric intrusion over the Northeast US. Negative correlation, although insignificant, was found in PV and NAO index over the Northeast US (r = −0.31, p= 20). This is consistent with lower baseline O3 levels during positive NAO springs, which was further verified using the stratospheric O3 dataset developed by Liu et al. (2013). Liu et al. (2013) showed that stratospheric O3 was hardly detected in the lowest two layers (i.e., 0.5 and 1.5 km) in April. In March, ~40 – 60 ppbv of stratospheric O3 reached the lowest layer 0.5 km in our study area in 2004 and 2006–2008 and reached the 1.5 km layer in 2001–2008. The stratospheric contribution to the 0.5 km layer in March 2008 was the largest of all Marchs of the decade, when NAO was negative (Fig. 8a)

Negative correlation, although insignificant, was also found between baseline CO and the NAO index at most of our study sites (Table 4). North American continental export could also impact the variation of baseline CO, while this impact could be confounded by other factors, e.g. stratospheric intrusion. Specifically, during positive NAO years, stronger continental outflow could lead to a decrease in baseline CO, while less stratospheric intrusion could lead to less dilution of surface CO and thus increase baseline CO levels. Further research is warranted to fully understand the relationship between baseline CO and NAO.

4.3. Combined effects of biomass burning and cyclone activity in summer

In summer 2009, the Northeast US was under the influence of frequent cold frontal passages associated with the largest number of cyclones passing through the region and was consequently exposed most frequently to air masses of Arctic origin. Moreover, summer 2009 saw the lowest fire emissions of CO (~11.9 Tg) of the decade from Russia and Canada (Fig. 6f). Hence, the lowest fire emissions of CO and the most frequent cyclone activities were likely two dominant factors leading to the decadal lowest summertime baseline CO and O3 in 2009.

However, in summer 2003, AO was negative and 15 cyclones passed the region (Fig. 6a), greater than the decadal mean (12), and yet baseline CO and O3 at the sites reached the decadal maxima (Figs. 3c, d and 6f). According to the analysis above, baseline CO and baseline O3 were expected to be lower during this summer than the decadal average as a result of above-average passages of cyclones. However, the decadal maximum fire emissions of CO in Russia and Canada in summer 2003 (Section 4.1) counteracted the effect of the cyclone activity. Another interesting example was summer 2007 which had the decadal minimum of cyclone activity (Fig. 6a), and the total CO emissions from wildfires in Russia and Canada were 13.6 Tg, the second lowest of the decade following summer 2009 (Fig. 6f). As a result, the site-average baseline CO and O3 levels in summer 2007 were below the decadal means. Therefore, the effect of biomass burning may dominate over that of AO and cyclone activity during some summers, while the two worked in concert during others.

4.4. Anthropogenic Emissions

4.4.1. Impacts on baseline CO

Global anthropogenic CO emissions showed a slight decrease of ~1% yr−1 over 1990 – 2010 (Granier et al., 2011). Consistent with the global emission decline, a decreasing trend was found in northern hemispheric CO using a trajectory-mapped MOZAIC-IAGOS CO dataset (Osman et al., 2016). In the US, total anthropogenic CO emissions declined at a rate of −3% yr−1 over 2000 – 2010, while increasing trends were found in India (~1.5% yr−1) and China (~3% yr−1) (Granier et al., 2011). It was likely that global CO emission decline with significant U.S. anthropogenic emission reductions could have contributed to the significant decreasing trends in baseline CO identified at our sea level to low elevation sites (i.e., 18 – 698 m). However, for the two highest sites MWO and WFM, it was hypothesized that their overall insignificant trends in baseline CO in spring and winter 2001 – 2010 (Table 2) resulted from the combined effect of decreasing US emissions and increasing Asian emissions.

Ten years of wintertime 36-hour backward trajectories (Fig. S1) suggested that nearly half of the time the air masses arriving at MWO and WFM originated from and passed through major source regions below their respective elevations, which placed the two sites under the influence of domestic anthropogenic emission reductions at least half of the time. On the other hand, the impact of continental to intercontinental transport, which has been suggested to be occurring most strongly in late winter to early spring in the middle to upper troposphere (~700 hPa – tropopause, Zhang et al. (2008)), could be just as important as, perhaps at times more important than, regional transport to MWO and WFM. This is because these are the highest sites situated close to the top of the daytime convective boundary layer, which are more likely impacted by free tropospheric air compared to low elevations sites. This was supported by the finding from Jonson et al. (2010)’s multi-model study of the long-range transport of O3 and its precursors that impact of intercontinental transport from Asia was stronger in the free troposphere (~ 800 hPa) than what was calculated for U.S. surface sites by Fiore et al. (2009) and Reidmiller et al. (2009). Transpacific transport of Asian pollution was found to be particularly strong in spring and winter due to the combined effect of efficient ventilation of the Asian boundary layer via midlatitudinal cyclones and convection, long lifetime of CO, and/or strong springtime biomass burning emissions in southeastern Asia, which weakened in summer (Liang et al., 2004).

Trends in CO were also computed for Niwot Ridge, Colorado (3526 m) and Mauna Loa, Hawaii (3402 m), two long-term remote monitoring locations from NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division (Section S3). Consistent with our study, no trends were found in winter and spring while significant decreasing trends in summer and fall at both sites. This further supports the hypothesis that in winter and spring high elevation sites in the Northeast U.S. were impacted by long-range transport of increasing Asian emissions.

4.4.2. Impacts on baseline O3

Significant decreasing trends were found in year-round baseline CO, while no trends in year-round baseline O3 at any site. This indicates that changes in baseline CO did not seem to affect year-round baseline O3, and other factors, e.g., opposite trends in emissions of different ozone precursors and varying meteorological conditions, could have been more dominant. In examining baseline O3 by season, it was found that TF was the only site with significant increasing trends in spring and winter at a rate of 2.4 ppbv yr−1 and 2.7 ppbv yr−1, respectively, which were not associated with trends in meteorological conditions such as NAO as discussed in Section 4.2.2. This points to the possible effect of anthropogenic emissions.

US Emissions of NOx were reduced by 48% over 1990 – 2010, largely due to control of emissions from power plants and mobile sources (Xing et al., 2013). The Northeast U.S. Urban Corridor, extending from Washington D.C. in the south to Boston in the north, was dominated by mobile combustion emissions of NOx. Annual mixing ratios of NO2 in New York City decreased at a rate of −0.3 ppbv yr−1 over 1980 – 2007 (Buckley and Mitchell, 2011). In winter and early spring with weakened photochemical production, decreased NOx emissions in urban areas could cause less loss of O3 via titration by NO (Liu et al., 1987; Jonson et al., 2006), resulting in enhanced O3 mixing ratios in urban plumes (Wilson et al., 2012). From measurements at our sites, data points of O3 corresponding to winds from the urban corridor were examined. It was found that the 10th percentile mixing ratio of O3 at TF in air masses from the urban corridor (157.5 – 202.5°) had been increasing at a rate of 1.81 ppbv yr−1 (p = 0.05) in spring and 1.52 ppbv yr−1(p <0.01) in winter (Figs. 10a and b). No trends were found at CS, MWO, PSP, and WFM under the influence of Northeast Urban Corridor air masses. Trends at PM were not computed, as wind direction data at this site were only available over 2007 – 2010. This strongly suggests that decreased NOx emissions in the urban corridor likely had a significant impact on springtime and wintertime baseline O3 at TF. We also investigated impacts of stratospheric intrusion, long-range transport, and NOx emission reductions from power plants (Section S4). None of them turned out to be the dominate factor contributing to the increasing springtime and wintertime baseline O3 at TF.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Seasonal 10th percentile mixing ratios of O3 with wind from the directions aligned with the urban corridor in (a) winter and (b) spring. Specifically, the wind directions selected for AI: 157.5° - 202.5°; CS: 157.5° - 202.5°; MWO: 157.5° - 202.5°; PM: 112.5° - 157.5°; TF: 157.5° - 202.5°;WFM: 112.5° - 157.5°;PSP: 67.5° - 112.5°.

5. Summary

Our study suggested that over 2001 – 2010 baseline CO at most sites (MWO, PM, TF, PSP, and WFM) decreased significantly at a rate between −4.3 and −2.3 ppbv yr−1 (p<0.01), which was associated with global anthropogenic CO emission reductions and decreasing biomass burning emissions in Russia. It was found that biomass burning impacted summertime baseline CO at all sites, except at PSP, and baseline O3 only at high elevation sites. In summer, ~38% of baseline CO variability was attributed to CO emissions from forest fires in Russia and ~22% to emissions from forest fires in Canada. Baseline CO at MWO and WFM did not exhibit a significant trend in spring and winter, hypothesized to result from the combined effect of decreasing domestic emissions and increasing Asian emissions. Different from baseline CO, no trends were found in year-round baseline O3 at all sites. The increasing trends in springtime and wintertime baseline O3 at TF was most likely caused by reduced NOx emissions over the US Northeast Urban Corridor. Summertime baseline CO and O3 was also related to the AO. When the AO was in negative phase, more frequent cyclone activities brought cleaner Arctic air to midlatitudes lowering CO and O3 at our sites. Significant negative correlation was found between baseline O3 and the NAO index in spring, potentially due to NAO-related changes in solar flux, stratospheric intrusion, and continental export.

The U.S. EPA lowered the NAAQS for ground-level O3 to 70 ppbv to improve protection of public health and welfare on 1 October 2015 (http://www3.epa.gov/ozonepollution). As the O3 NAAQS are set closer to background levels, states will face ever increasing challenges with regard to fulfilling their obligation for NAAQS attainment. This study reinforced that, in addition to domestic emission controls, intercontinental transport of anthropogenic and wildfire emissions together with meteorological conditions should also be considered when designing encompassing, cost-effective emission control strategies that account for impacts of regional to global emissions of multiple pollutants (e.g., CO, CH4, NOx, and NMHCs). In addition, the relationships between baseline O3/CO and various factors (e.g. NOx emission controls, biomass burning emissions, NAO, and AO) examined in this study can also be used as reference point for evaluating global/regional air quality modeling systems that are used in air quality management applications. Different from most studies that focused on episodic influence of wildfires (e.g., DeBell et al., 2004; Dutkiewicz et al., 2011b; Liu et al., 2005), this was the first measurement-based study to examine the impact of wildfires on baseline CO and O3 over time periods of ten years in the 2000s. Moreover, this study found that trace gases over the upwind areas could change in response to varying intensity of NAO. One limitation of this study is that it was based on ten-years of observations, and hence it was unlikely to predict the potential longer-term changes in natural emissions and AO/NAO signals as well as their impacts on baseline O3. Also, while data analysis studies provide measurement-based estimates of contributions of various processes to baseline CO and O3, they may be limited in clearly separating such contributions. Future research that integrates measurements and model simulations is warranted to further address the issues identified in this work on climatological time scales.

Supplementary Material

Supp

Acknowledgements.

This work was funded by the Environment Protection Agency grant #83521501. We are grateful to Z. Ye, Y. Zhang, R. D. Yanai, G. Townsend, and E. P. Law for their valuable suggestions and help. We thank K. Cochrane and K. Yan for their assistance in the early stage of the study.

Footnotes

Disclaimer. Although this work has been reviewed and approved for publication by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), it does not reflect the views and policies of the agency.

References

  1. Alvarado MJ, Logan JA, Mao J, Apel E, Riemer D, Blake D, Cohen RC, Min K-E, Perring AE, Browne EC, Wooldridge PJ, Diskin GS, Sachse GW, Fuelberg H, Sessions WR, Harrigan DL, Huey G, Liao J, Case-Hanks A, Jimenez JL, Cubison MJ, Vay SA, Weinheimer AJ, Knapp DJ, Montzka DD, Flocke FM, Pollack IB, Wennberg PO, Kurten A, Crounse J, Clair JMS, Wisthaler A, Mikoviny T, Yantosca RM, Carouge CC, Le Sager P, 2010. Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys 10, 9739–9760. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-9739-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archambault HM, Bosart LF, Keyser D, Aiyyer AR, 2008. Influence of Large-Scale Flow Regimes on Cool-Season Precipitation in the Northeastern United States. Mon. Wea. Rev 136, 2945–2963. doi: 10.1175/2007MWR2308.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bae MS, Schwab JJ, Chen WN, Lin CY, Rattigan OV, Demerjian KL, 2011. Identifying pollutant source directions using multiple analysis methods at a rural location in New York. Atmos. Environ 45, 2531–2540. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnston AG, Livezey RE, 1987. Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon. Wea. Rev 115, 1083–1126. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer M, Del Genio AD, 2006. Composite analysis of winter cyclones in a GCM: Influence on climatological humidity. J. Clim 19, 1652–1672. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3690.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckley SM, Mitchell MJ, 2011. Improvements in urban air quality: Case studies from New York state, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut. 214, 93–106. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0407-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan E, 2009. Regional ground-level ozone trends in the context of meteorological influences across Canada and the eastern United States from 1997 to 2006. J. Geophys. Res 114, 1–18. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan E, Vet RJ, 2010. Baseline levels and trends of ground level ozone in Canada and the United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys 10, 8629–8647. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-8629-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christoudias T, Pozzer a., Lelieveld J, 2012. Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on air pollution transport. Atmos. Chem. Phys 12, 869–877. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-869-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper OR, Parrish DD, Stohl a, Trainer M, Nédélec P, Thouret V, Cammas JP, Oltmans SJ, Johnson BJ, Tarasick D, Leblanc T, McDermid IS, Jaffe D, Gao R, Stith J, Ryerson T, Aikin K, Campos T, Weinheimer a, Avery M. a, 2010. Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America. Nature 463, 344–348. doi: 10.1038/nature08708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cui J, Pandey Deolal S, Sprenger M, Henne S, Staehelin J, Steinbacher M, Nédélec P, 2011. Free tropospheric ozone changes over Europe as observed at Jungfraujoch (1990–2008): An analysis based on backward trajectories. J. Geophys. Res 116, 1–14. doi: 10.1029/2010JD015154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. DeBell LJ, Talbot RW, Dibb JE, Munger JW, Fischer EV, Frolking SE, 2004. A major regional air pollution event in the northeastern United States caused by extensive forest fires in Quebec, Canada. J. Geophys. Res 109, 1–16. doi: 10.1029/2004JD004840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwent RG, Simmonds PG, Manning a. J., Spain TG, 2007. Trends over a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007 in surface ozone at the atmospheric research station, Mace Head, Ireland. Atmos. Environ 41, 9091–9098. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duncan BN, Logan JA, 2008. Model analysis of the factors regulating the trends and variability of carbon monoxide between 1988 and 1997. Atmos. Chem. Phys 8, 7389–7403. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dutkiewicz VA, Husain L, Roychowdhury UK, Demerjian KL, 2011a. Black carbon transport to a remote mountaintop in the northeastern US and relationship with other pollutants. Atmos. Environ 45, 2110–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutkiewicz VA, Husain L, Roychowdhury UK, Demerjian KL, 2011b. Impact of Canadian wildfire smoke on air quality at two rural sites in NY State. Atmos. Environ 45, 2028–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eckhardt S, Stohl A, Wernli H, James P, Forster C, Spichtinger N, 2004. A 15-year climatology of warm conveyor belts. J. Clim 17, 218–237. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fiore a. M., Dentener FJ, Wild O, Cuvelier C, Schultz MG, Hess P, Textor C, Schulz M, Doherty RM, Horowitz LW, MacKenzie I. a., Sanderson MG, Shindell DT, Stevenson DS, Szopa S, Van Dingenen R, Zeng G, Atherton C, Bergmann D, Bey I, Carmichael G, Collins WJ, Duncan BN, Faluvegi G, Folberth G, Gauss M, Gong S, Hauglustaine D, Holloway T, Isaksen I.S. a, Jacob DJ, Jonson JE, Kaminski JW, Keating TJ, Lupu a., Manner E, Montanaro V, Park RJ, Pitari G, Pringle KJ, Pyle J. a., Schroeder S, Vivanco MG, Wind P, Wojcik G, Wu S, Zuber a., 2009. Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution. J. Geophys. Res 114, 1–21. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010816. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Granier C, Bessagnet B, Bond T, D’Angiola A, van der Gon HD, Frost GJ, Heil A, Kaiser JW, Kinne S, Klimont Z, Kloster S, Lamarque JF, Liousse C, Masui T, Meleux F, Mieville A, Ohara T, Raut JC, Riahi K, Schultz MG, Smith SJ, Thompson A, van Aardenne J, van der Werf GR, van Vuuren DP, 2011. Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period. Clim. Change 109, 163–190. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gratz LE, Jaffe D. a., Hee JR, 2014. Causes of increasing ozone and decreasing carbon monoxide in springtime at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory from 2004 to 2013. Atmos. Environ 109, 323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hallock-Waters KA, Doddridge BG, Dickerson RR, Spitzer S, Ray JD, 1999. Carbon monoxide in the U.S. mid-Atlantic troposphere: Evidence for a decreasing trend. Geophys. Res. Lett 26, 2861–2864. doi: 10.1029/1999GL900609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Stocks BJ, Hirsch A, Gower ST, O’Neill KP, Kasischke ES, 2000. The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Global Change Biology 6, 174–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hecobian a., Liu Z, Hennigan CJ, Huey LG, Jimenez JL, Cubison MJ, Vay S, Diskin GS, Sachse GW, Wisthaler a., Mikoviny T, Weinheimer a. J., Liao J, Knapp DJ, Wennberg PO, Kürten a., Crounse JD, St. Clair J, Wang Y, Weber RJ, 2011. Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys 11, 13325–13337. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hegarty J, Mao H, Talbot R, 2009. Synoptic influences on springtime tropospheric O3 and CO over the North American export region observed by TES. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 9, 3755–3776, doi: 10.5194/acp-9-3755-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hegarty J, Mao H, Talbot R, 2007. Synoptic controls on summertime surface ozone in the northeastern United States. J. Geophys. Res 112, D14306. doi: 10.1029/2006JD008170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hess PG, Lamarque JF, 2007. Ozone source attribution and its modulation by the Arctic oscillation during the spring months. J. Geophys. Res 112, 1–17. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Honrath RE, Owen RC, Val Martín M, Reid JS, Lapina K, Fialho P, Dziobak MP, Kleissl J, Westphal DL, 2004. Regional and hemispheric impacts of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions on summertime CO and O3 in the North Atlantic lower free troposphere. J. Geophys. Res 109, 1–17. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (HTAP) (2010), Hemispheric transport of air pollution 2010 assessment report, edited by: Keating TJ and Zuber A, available at: http://www.htap.org.
  29. Hu Q, Tawaye Y, Feng S, 2004. Variations of the northern hemisphere atmospheric energetics: 1948–2000. J. Clim 17, 1975–1986. doi:. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang M, Bowman KW, Carmichael GR, Lee M, Chai T, Spak SN, Henze DK, Darmenov AS, da Silva AM, 2015. Improved western U.S. background ozone estimates via constraining nonlocal and local source contributions using Aura TES and OMI observations. J. Geophys. Res 120, 10.1002/2014JD022993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hudman RC, Murray LT, Jacob DJ, Turquety S, Wu S, Millet DB, Avery M, Goldstein AH, Holloway J, 2009. North American influence on tropospheric ozone and the effects of recent emission reductions: Constraints from ICARTT observations. J. Geophys. Res 114. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hurrell JW, 1995. Decadal trends in the north atlantic oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269, 676–679. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5224.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaffe D, Bertschi I, Jaeglé L, Novelli P, Reid JS, Tanimoto H, Vingarzan R, Westphal DL, 2004. Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions and impact on surface ozone in western North America. Geophys. Res. Lett 31, 6–9. doi: 10.1029/2004GL020093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jonson JE, Simpson D, Fagerli H, Solberg S, 2006. Can we explain the trends in European ozone levels? Atmos. Chem. Phys 6, 51–66. doi: 10.5194/acp-6-51-2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jonson JE, Stohl A, Fiore AM, Hess P, Szopa S, Wild O, Zeng G, Dentener FJ, Lupu A, Schultz MG, Duncan BN, Sudo K, Wind P, Schulz M, Marmer E, Cuvelier C, Keating T, Zuber A, Valdebenito A, Dorokhov V, De Backer H, Davies J, Chen GH, Johnson B, Tarasick DW, Stübi R, Newchurch MJ, von der Gathen P, Steinbrecht W, Claude H, 2010. A multi-model analysis of vertical ozone profiles. Atmos. Chem. Phys 10, 5759–5783. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-5759-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim PS, Jacob DJ, Liu X, Warner JX, Yang K, Chance K, Thouret V, Nedelec P, 2013. Global ozone-CO correlations from OMI and AIRS: Constraints on tropospheric ozone sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys 13, 9321–9335. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-9321-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumar a., Wu S, Weise MF, Honrath R, Owen RC, Helmig D, Kramer L, Val Martin M, Li Q, 2013. Free-troposphere ozone and carbon monoxide over the North Atlantic for 2001–2011. Atmos. Chem. Phys 13, 12537–12547. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-12537-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leibensperger EM, Mickley LJ, Jacob DJ, 2008. Sensitivity of US air quality to mid-latitude cyclone frequency and implications of 1980–2006 climate change. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8, 7075–7086, doi: 10.5194/acp-8-7075-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liang Q, Jaeglé L, Jaffe D. a., Weiss-Penzias P, Heckman A, Snow J. a., 2004. Long-range transport of Asian pollution to the northeast Pacific: Seasonal variations and transport pathways of carbon monoxide. J. Geophys. Res 109, 1–16. doi: 10.1029/2003JD004402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin C-YC, Jacob DJ, Munger JW, Fiore AM, 2000. Increasing background ozone in surface air over the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett 27, 3465–3468. doi: 10.1029/2000GL011762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu J, Tarasick DW, Fioletov VE, McLinden C, Zhao T, Gong S, Sioris C, Jin JJ, Liu G, Moeini O, 2013. A global ozone climatology from ozone soundings via trajectory mapping: A stratospheric perspective. Atmos. Chem. Phys 13, 11441–11464. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-11441-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu SC, 1987. Ozone production in the rural troposphere and the implications for regional and global ozone distributions. J. Geophys. Res 92, 4191–4207. [Google Scholar]
  43. Logan JA, 1989. Ozone in rural areas of the United States. J. Geophys. Res 94, 8511–8532. [Google Scholar]
  44. Logan J. a., Staehelin J, Megretskaia I. a., Cammas JP, Thouret V, Claude H, De Backer H, Steinbacher M, Scheel HE, Stbi R, Frhlich M, Derwent R, 2012. Changes in ozone over Europe: Analysis of ozone measurements from sondes, regular aircraft (MOZAIC) and alpine surface sites. J. Geophys. Res 117, 1–23. doi: 10.1029/2011JD016952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu X, Zhang L, Yue X, Zhang J, Jaffe DA, Stohl A, Zhao Y, Shao J, 2016. Wildfire influences on the variability and trend of summer surface ozone in the mountainous western United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys 16, 14687–14702. doi: 10.5194/acp-16-14687-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mao H, Talbot R, 2012. Speciated mercury at marine, coastal, and inland sites in New England-Part 1: Temporal variability. Atmos. Chem. Phys 12, 5099–5112. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-5099-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mao H, Talbot R, 2004. Role of meteorological processes in two New England ozone episodes during summer 2001. J. Geophys. Res 109, 1–17. doi: 10.1029/2004JD004850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. McKeen SA, Wotawa G, Parrish DD, Holloway JS, Buhr MP, Hübler G, Fehsenfeld FC, Meagher JF, 2002. Ozone production from Canadian wildfires during June and July of 1995. J. Geophys. Res 107, 10.1029/2001JD000697. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. McKendry I, Strawbridge K, Karumudi ML, O’Neill N, MacDonald a. M., Leaitch R, Jaffe D, Cottle P, Sharma S, Sheridan P, Ogren J, 2011. Californian forest fire plumes over southwestern British Columbia: Lidar, sunphotometry, and mountaintop chemistry observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys 11, 465–477. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-465-2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Murazaki K, Hess P, 2006. How does climate change contribute to surface ozone change over the United States? J. Geophys. Res 111, 1–16. doi: 10.1029/2005JD005873.20411040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Novelli PC, Masarie KA, Lang PM, Hall BD, Myers RC, Elkins JW, 2003. Reanalysis of tropospheric CO trends: Effects of the 1997–1998 wildfires. J. Geophys. Res 108, ACH 14–1-ACH 14–14. [Google Scholar]
  52. Oltmans SJ, Lefohn a. S., Harris JM, Tarasick DW, Thompson a. M., Wernli H, Johnson BJ, Novelli PC, Montzka S. a., Ray JD, Patrick LC, Sweeney C, Jefferson a., Dann T, Davies J, Shapiro M, Holben BN, 2010. Enhanced ozone over western North America from biomass burning in Eurasia during April 2008 as seen in surface and profile observations. Atmos. Environ 44, 4497–4509. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Oltmans SJ, Lefohn a. S., Shadwick D, Harris JM, Scheel HE, Galbally I, Tarasick DW, Johnson BJ, Brunke EG, Claude H, Zeng G, Nichol S, Schmidlin F, Davies J, Cuevas E, Redondas a., Naoe H, Nakano T, Kawasato T, 2013. Recent tropospheric ozone changes - A pattern dominated by slow or no growth. Atmos. Environ 67, 331–351. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oltmans SJ, Lefohn AS, Harris JM, Shadwick DS, 2008. Background ozone levels of air entering the west coast of the US and assessment of longer-term changes. Atmos. Environ 42, 6020–6038. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Osman MK, Tarasick DW, Liu J, Moeini O, Thouret V, Fioletov VE, Parrington M, Nédélec P, 2016. Carbon monoxide climatology derived from the trajectory mapping of global MOZAIC-IAGOS data. Atmos. Chem. Phys 16, 10263–10282. doi: 10.5194/acp-16-10263-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pollack IB, Ryerson TB, Trainer M, Neuman J. a., Roberts JM, Parrish DD, 2013. Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements from 1960 to 2010. J. Geophys. Res 118, 5893–5911. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Price HU, Jaffe D. a., Cooper OR, Doskey PV, 2004. Photochemistry, ozone production, and dilution during long-range transport episodes from Eurasia to the northwest United States. J. Geophys. Res 109, 1–10. doi: 10.1029/2003JD004400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Prinn RG, 2003. The Cleansing Capacity of the Atmosphere. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 28, 29–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Racherla PN, Adams PJ, 2008. The Response of surface ozone to climate change over the Eastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys 8, 871–885, doi: 10.5194/acp-8-871-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Real E, Law KS, Weinzierl B, Fiebig M, Petzold a., Wild O, Methven J, Arnold S. a., Stohl a., Huntrieser H, Roiger AE, Schlager H, Stewart D, Avery M. a., Sachse GW, Browell EV, Ferrare R. a., Blake D, 2007. Processes influencing ozone levels in Alaskan forest fire plumes during long-range transport over the North Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res 112, 1–19. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Reidmiller DR, Fiore AM, Jaffe DA, Bergmann D, Cuvelier C, Dentener FJ, Duncan BN, Folberth G, Gauss M, Gong S, Hess P, Jonson JE, Keating T, Lupu A, Marmer E, Park R, Schultz MG, Shindell DT, Szopa S, Vivanco MG, Wild O, Zuber A, 2009. The influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US. Atmos. Chem. Phys 9, 5027–5042. doi: 10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rogers JC, 1997. North Atlantic storm track variability and its association to the North Atlantic oscillation and climate variability of Northern Europe. J. Clim 10, 1635–1647. doi:. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwab JJ, Spicer JB, Demerjian KL, 2009. Ozone, trace gas, and particulate matter measurements at a rural site in southwestern New York state: 1995–2005. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc 1995 59, 293–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Serreze MC, Barrett AP, Slater AG, Steele M, Zhang J, Trenberth KE, 2007. The large-scale energy budget of the Arctic. J. Geophys. Res 112, 1–17. doi: 10.1029/2006JD008230 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stevenson DS, Dentener FJ, Schultz MG, Ellingsen K, van Noije TPC, Wild O, Zeng G, Amann M, Atherton CS, Bell N, Bergmann DJ, Bey I, Butler T, Cofala J, Collins WJ, Derwent RG, Doherty RM, Drevet J, Eskes HJ, Fiore AM, Gauss M, Hauglustaine DA, Horowitz LW, Isaksen ISA, Krol MC, Lamarque J-F, Lawrence MG, Montanaro V, Müller J-F, Pitari G, Prather MJ, Pyle JA, Rast S, Rodriguez JM, Sanderson MG, Savage NH, Shindell DT, Strahan SE, Sudo K, Szopa S, 2006. Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone. J. Geophys. Res 111, D08301. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Talbot R, Mao H, Sive B, 2005. Diurnal characteristics of surface level O3 and other important trace gases in New England. J. Geophys. Res 110, D09307. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM, 2000. Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: Month-to-month variability. J. Clim 13, 1000–1016. [Google Scholar]
  68. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2012. Our Nation’s Air Status and Trends Through 2010. Tech Rep EPA–454/R–12–001. doi:EPA-454/R-09-002, available at: http://www3.epa.gov/airtrends/2011. [Google Scholar]
  69. Voulgarakis A, Telford PJ, Aghedo AM, Braesicke P, Faluvegi G, Abraham NL, Bowman KW, Pyle JA, Shindell DT, 2011. Global multi-year O3-CO correlation patterns from models and TES satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys 11, 5819–5838. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-5819-2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wilson RC, Fleming ZL, Monks PS, Clain G, Henne S, Konovalov IB, Szopa S, Menut L, 2012. Have primary emission reduction measures reduced ozone across Europe? An analysis of European rural background ozone trends 1996–2005. Atmos. Chem. Phys 12, 437–454. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-437-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Worden HM, Deeter MN, Frankenberg C, George M, Nichitiu F, Worden J, Aben I, Bowman KW, Clerbaux C, Coheur PF, De Laat a. T.J., Detweiler R, Drummond JR, Edwards DP, Gille JC, Hurtmans D, Luo M, Martínez-Alonso S, Massie S, Pfister G, Warner JX, 2013. Decadal record of satellite carbon monoxide observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys 13, 837–850. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-837-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wotawa G, Novelli PC, Trainer M, Granier C, 2001. Inter-annual variability of summertime CO concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere explained by boreal forest fires in North America and Russia. Geophys. Res. Lett 28, 4575–4578. doi: 10.1029/2001GL013686 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Xing J, Pleim J, Mathur R, Pouliot G, Hogrefe C, Gan C-M, Wei C, 2013. Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys 13, 7531–7549. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Xu X, Lin W, Wang T, Yan P, Tang J, Meng Z, Wang Y, 2008. Long-term trend of surface ozone at a regional background station in eastern China 1991 – 2006: enhanced variability. Atmos. Chem. Phys 8, 2595–2607, doi: 10.5194/acp-8-2595-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang L, Jacob DJ, Boersma KF, Jaffe DA, Olson JR, Bowman KW, Worden JR, Thompson AM, Avery MA, Cohen RC, Dibb JE, Flock FM, Fuelberg HE, Huey LG, McMillan WW, Singh HB, Weinheimer AJ, 2008. Transpacific transport of ozone pollution and the effect of recent Asian emission increases on air quality in North America: an integrated analysis using satellite, aircraft, ozonesonde, and surface observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys 8, 6117–6136. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-6117-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp

RESOURCES