Abstract
Flash floods have long been common in Asian cities, with recent increases in urbanization and extreme rainfall driving increasingly severe and frequent events. Floods in urban areas cause significant damage to infrastructure, communities and the environment. Numerical modelling of flood inundation offers detailed information necessary for managing flood risk in such contexts. This study presents a calibrated flood inundation model using referenced photos, an assessment of the influence of four extreme rainfall events on water depth and inundation area in the Hanoi central area. Four types of historical and extreme rainfall were input into the inundation model. The modeled results for a 2008 flood event with 9 referenced stations resulted in an R2 of 0.6 compared to observations. The water depth at the different locations was simulated under the four extreme rainfall types. The flood inundation under the Probable Maximum Precipitation presents the highest risk in terms of water depth and inundation area. These results provide insights into managing flood risk, designing flood prevention measures, and appropriately locating pump stations.
Introduction
Climate change has likely increased the frequency of heavy precipitation over the past two decades over many areas of the globe1. Extreme rainfall events have led to dramatic damage to human life and property, most seriously by contributing to urban flooding2,3. High population densities and low-lying topography in urban parts of Southeast Asia make them uniquely vulnerable to extreme rainfall and consequent floods. Notable examples of recent flooding in Southeast Asia include Hanoi in 20084, Bangkok in 20115, Beijing in July 20126, and many large southern cities in China in July 20177. The increasing risk of flood disasters makes analysis of water depth and inundation area all the more urgent as cities increasingly demand flood management strategies.
Many modeling tools and techniques have been developed to analyze flood inundation and address this knowledge gap. Spatially, floods have been analyzed at many scales. At the subnational scale, analyses of floods have been conducted for urban parts of Bordeaux, France8, the 1994 flood of Alba, Piedmont, Italy9, metropolitan areas of Charlotte, North Carolina, USA10, Guangzhou, China11 and the Dutch polder area12. At regional and national scales, analyses include a review of trend analysis and climate change impacts on floods in Europe13, incorporating the effect of climate change on flooding in Bangladesh14, flood dynamics in urbanized landscapes of north-eastern Italy15, and national scale flood hazard mapping16. Global-scale river flood vulnerability analyses have also been conducted17. Rainfall-runoff floods were also analyzed at the basin scale from 2.6 to 26000 km2 in the United States and Puerto Rico18. Flood events have been studied at the basin scale19–21 and in urban areas5,22,23. Flood simulation methods include flood frequency analysis10,24–27, process-based flood models28–31and satellite remote sensing32–35. Rainfall-runoff-inundation models were used to simulate the 2011 Thailand floods at the river basin scale36. Hydrological modelling was used for large-scale flood inundation forecasting linked to the semi-distributed Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrologic model and LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model31. It is essential to study urban floods under extreme rainfall using 2-dimensional flood inundation models to develop detail data about urban conditions and provide scientific support for urban flood management.
The Flo-2D model has been used for simulating flood events in many contexts. Global Climate Models (GCMs) have been used as input data to the Flo-2D model to predict future flood events37. Low impact development effects on flood inundation of urban areas have been analyzed to develop rainfall harvesting systems and permeable pavements which have a significant impact on mitigating flood inundation risk38. Flood risk assessment of informal urban settlements has also been conducted using assessment of structure fragility and the Flo-2D model39. Remotely sensed images have also been used to achieve spatial parameterization of Manning’s roughness coefficient for the Flo-2D model40. Uncertainty of flood mapping assessments with Flo-2D has been evaluated using HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP based on benchmark analyses and assessment of real-world cases and used to calculate additional uncertainties due to data scarcity41. The first-order perturbation method based on a Karhunen-Loevè expansion was tested to analyze uncertainty of Flo-2D analyses with a random floodplain roughness field42.
The objectives of this study are to set up a flood inundation model (Flo-2D model), analyze water depth and inundation area under four historical and extreme rainfall types, and identify sustainable approaches to urban flood management under present conditions and under climate change conditions. Referenced photos were used to calibrate flood simulation results for the Hanoi central area in 2008. The four historical and extreme rainfall types include the historical rainfall of 2008, the historical maximum two-day rainfall, probable precipitation within return period of 200 years and probable maximum precipitation. Detail information about water depth and inundation area under extreme precipitation reveals areas prone to urban floods and provides scientific guidance for designing and implementing flood prevention structures and developing future flood prevention plans.
Results
Study area and Data
Hanoi is the capital of Vietnam and has seen increasing urbanization and economic development during recent decades. Hanoi is located Northwest of the Red River delta from 20°53′ to 21°23′ north latitude, and from 105°44′ to 106°02′ east latitude, adjacent to Thai Nguyen, and Vinh Phuc to the North, Ha Nam to the South, Phu Tho and Hoa Binh to the West, and Bac Giang, Bac Ninh, and Hung Yen to the East. After the administrative boundary expansion in August 2008, Hanoi has an area of 3,344.70 km2 with a total population of approximately 7.74 million. The Hanoi central area is located at the right side of the Red River (Fig. 1). The city is now urbanizing quickly, with a continuous flow of immigrants from peri-urban and rural areas. The Hanoi Central Area is approximately 76.26 km2 with an average annual temperature of 24 °C at an elevation of 5 to 20 m and an average annual total rainfall of 1676 mm. Population growth and economic development have put strong pressure on the environment and natural resources and the city’s infrastructure as well. In fact, the pace of urban infrastructure development has lagged population growth and economic development. A major emerging issue regarding insufficiency of city infrastructure is the lack of safe drinking water supply and sewerage coverage in newly urbanized areas, which has led to serious environmental pollution in the receiving water bodies of the city.
Between October 30 and November 1, 2008, a flood triggered by torrential rains caused a flood disaster which led to significant human casualties and economic loss4,43. This flood affected north and central Vietnam, as well as southern parts of China and caused the death of 92 people. Up to one meter of water flooded the city’s streets, and urban transportation was halted. Food prices, especially those of meat and vegetables, reached exorbitant levels in the city as the rains destroyed crops and livestock and crippled transportation corridors. The total economic loss due to this flood exceeded 177 million USD.
The four main rivers in this catchment (To Lich, Lu, Set and Kim Nguu) flow from West to East, discharging into the Nhue River through the Thanh Liet Culvert44. Flow in the system is mainly generated from local rainfall with strong seasonal variation. The To Lich River is largely responsible for draining discharge from the city during heavy rain45. The Yen So pumping station is the primary station for draining water from the central area whenever heavy rain occurs. The pumping station was built in 1998, including six sluice gates of 3 m width and a maximum water level of 11 m. The designed pumping capacity in 2008 was 45 m3/s, and it has been expanded to 90 m3/s after the second phase of construction, which was finished in September 2010. The pumping capacity of 45 m3/s was used in the Flo-2D model (described below) as the flood events took place in 2008.
Approximately 30-meter mesh Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data (Fig. 2a) was collected from the original data of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 1 Arc-Second Global46. Land use data from 2010 (Fig. 2b) was collected from the Hanoi Urban Planning Institute. Historical daily rainfall data in Hanoi for 1961–2008 was recorded by the National Hydro-Meteorological Services of Vietnam. In the flood inundation model, we only consider the river channel based on elevation due to a lack of cross-section data.
Flood inundation simulation results
Flood inundation simulations were carried out for the central area of Hanoi. Four historical and extreme rainfall types are shown in Table 1. Historical rainfall for 2008 (R1) was used for calibrating the flood inundation simulation. Due to lack of digital observed water depth during flood events in 2008, water depth was estimated from the referenced photos by judging the water depth through referenced objects in the images. We use 9 referenced photos for calibration proposes in Fig. 3. All 9 points are in areas of high population density in the Hanoi central area. S1 is a roadside shopping area. The referenced water depth was judged as 2/3 of the bicycle tire with 0.47 m diameter. S2 uses referenced water depth of the height under the Asian man’s medial malleolus of 0.06 m. The water depth of S3 is judged from the pictures with 0.1 m which is about 2/3 road curb height. S4 uses the diameter of the bicycle tire of 0.7 m. The referenced water depth of S5 is the height of the curb of 0.15 m. S6 is the referenced water depth of about 1/2 car tire diameter of 0.35 m. S7 uses the water depth based on average upper thigh height of Asian women of 0.71 m. The referenced water depth of S8 is the average height of the tibia for Asian women of 0.4 m. S9 uses the referenced water depth of the height of the curb of 0.15 m. The simulated water depth was compared with the referenced water depth in Fig. 4. The simulated water depth in S1, S6 and S7 underestimated the referenced water depth. The simulated water depth in S2 and S8 overestimated the referenced water depth. Referenced water depth of S3 is the same as the simulated water depth. All other simulation results are close to the referenced water depth. The overall relationship between inundation simulation and referenced water depth yields an R2 of 0.6. This calibration result is limited to these 9 stations due to lack of observed water depth. The difference between referenced and simulated water depth is still large. Further studies on the modification of model parameters as well as the collection of observed water depth and urban sewerage system data are necessary to fully investigate the system dynamics.
Table 1.
Rainfall | Precipitation (mm) | Maximum Depth | Inundation Area (Percentage of 76.26 km2 (water surface included)) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | 0.3 m~0.5 m | 0.5 m~1.0 m | 1.0 m~1.5 m | >1.5 m | ||
R 1 | 563.3 | 347 | 128.2 | 88.1 | 2.08 | 11.3% | 9.1% | 0.8% | 0.1% |
R 2 | 560.4 | 165.5 | 394.9 | 0 | 2.93 | 12.8% (13%)* | 16.3% (80%)* | 3.1% (268%)* | 0.4% (209%)* |
R 3 | 622 | 62 | 161 | 399 | 2.99 | 12.8% (13%)* | 16.8% (85%)* | 3.2% (284%)* | 0.5% (216%)* |
R 4 | 840 | 26.8 | 57.7 | 755.5 | 3.23 | 12.5% (10%)* | 24.3% (168%)* | 8.7% (939%)* | 1.3% (820%)* |
*Percentage numbers inside the bracket are meaning the increased percentage compared with the inundation area of R1.
Table 1 shows that the maximum water depth for R1 is 2.08 m, and the water depth for R2, R3 and R4 increased with change of precipitation intensity, amount and pattern. The total amount of R2 is similar with R1. The maximum water depth of R2 is almost 0.87 m higher than the maximum water depth in R1. The inundation area with water depth of 0.3–0.5 m is 11.3% of the total area with 76.26 km2 for the R1 rainfall. Inundation area increased to 12.8% for the R2 rainfall. The inundation area with water depth of 0.5–1.0 m in R1 is 9.1%, and it increases to 16.3% under R2. It increases slightly (0.5%) under R3 compared with R2. The percentage of inundation area with water depth from 1.0 to 1.5 m in R2 and R3 increased more than three times compared with that under R1. The inundation area for the water depth of 1.0–1.5 m in R4 reached 8.7%. The percentage of inundation area with water depth over 1.5 m was 1.3% under the R4 rainfall case.
Figure 5 shows the spatial distribution of the inundation area. Satellite images were used for the background to clearly present the inundation results. The northwestern part of the Hanoi central area had the largest inundation area for the R1 rainfall case. The inundation area under R2 increased significantly compared with that under R1. The southeast part of the city exhibits the maximum water depth under the R2 rainfall case. The inundation area under R3 is quite similar with that under R2. The inundation area under R4 has almost double the inundation area than that under R3. The northwest and southeast part of the city experience the most inundation and the maximum water depth under the R4 rainfall case. Judging based on the 2010 land use map of the Hanoi central area, flood waters converge in the low elevation areas which saw shifts in land-use from water surface and agricultural to urban. Areas of dramatic inundation are in highly sensitive housing areas. The highest water depth was observed in public park and lake areas. Figure 5 and Table 1 show that flood inundation for R4 results in the most inundation area and highest water depth. This result provides analytical guidance suggesting that the Probable Maximum Precipitation can be used for predicting future urban flood inundation under extreme rainfall.
Discussion
Spatial distribution of flood inundation under the four types of historical and extreme rainfall shows that the water depth and flood inundation area under two-day rainfall is higher than that under three-day rainfall with the same total rainfall amount. The level of rainfall intensity and pattern determines flood inundation risk. The annual three-day maximum precipitation with 200-year return period as well as the probable maximum precipitation are recommended to represent extreme rainfall for urban flood management. The rainfall intensity,duration and pattern is also important factors contributing to depth and extent of flood inundation, particularly as urban rainfall becomes more extreme under climate change22,47. Because urban flood frequency curves depend on rainfall amount and duration distribution48, urban flood prevention should consider the quantification of extreme rainfall events and return periods49. Some rainfall durations and intensities result in extreme early peak discharge in rivers50,51 which present a difficulty in pumping floodwater to nearby receiving bodies.
Due to a lack of detailed reservoir information, the flood inundation analysis in this study is only based on elevation. R2 shows the highest water depth in the southern reservoirs. Floodwaters are centralized in the reservoirs in R2 compared with in R1. For R4, water still flows into the central and southern reservoirs. Natural lakes or manmade reservoirs play an important role in reducing flood inundation risk in urban areas52 and adaptive reservoir management offers an opportunity for flood mitigation under climate change53. The capacity and numbers of reservoirs have a direct effect on reducing flood inundation risk. Improved reservoir management can help reduce flood inundation in urban areas54. Multiple reservoirs and operating rule curves are vitally important for water supply balances and the protection of downstream ecological systems and flood control55. Integrated reservoir operation should be combined with real-time monitoring systems to protect against flood events and multi-purpose reservoir systems can be constructed or adapted for flood control. Although hard infrastructure around reservoirs and dykes can defend against urban floods, increasing or reestablishing connectivity of reservoirs and rivers can mitigate flooding and overbanking.
Low elevation and high population areas are uniquely vulnerable to urban floods and economic destruction. The flood inundation simulation of 2008 shows that most of the inundation areas are in high population density areas and caused major economic loss. Results show that the most inundated areas are in the low-elevation housing area for the R4 case. Some human activities that increase flood risk are pumping underground water and building large structures leading to land subsidence and reduced elevations. Lack of observed river channel cross-section data and observed discharge made it difficult to calibrate river discharge in this simulation. Further research can be done to calibrate flood inundation models using observed discharge data. Due to limited observed data, the Flo-2D model for the Hanoi flood inundation did not consider real conditions such as height of buildings and boundary conditions. The results obtained from Flo-2D have numerous uncertainties related to the model structure, data input and boundary conditions. Exploring and resolving these uncertainties point to an important area of further study.
Present flood management plans make reducing flood inundation difficult in the context of the four types of extreme rainfall. Results suggest that setting up pump stations to deliver water to the Red River, reservoirs or underground water storage facilities would be effective. This study investigated installation of a pump station to discharge floodwater to the Red River. The pump station was not effective to reduce the inundation area and water depth due to the low elevation of the urban central area. Underground water storage offers a promising approach to reduce inundation area and water depth in high population areas, but with a high cost. Rainfall harvesting systems could store some of the water and delay the water inflow to the urban sewerage systems. Large-scale shifts in land use are essentially necessary for defending against urban floods56. Land-use management in urban areas can help store rainfall (e.g. in reservoirs and wetlands) and manage infiltration to the underground soil by green land. Reducing construction in natural floodplains can enhance natural flood attenuation capacity of rivers in urban areas. Prone areas of low elevation can be converted into multi-purpose reservoirs with integrated flood control operations. Wetland restoration is another option for reducing flood inundation, improving ecosystem health and regulating urban hydrologic extremes. Risk analysis based on new data, theoretical development and boundary conditions can help in evaluation of existing flood protection systems for long term management decisions57. The increase in expected annual economic losses under climatic change should be considered in future adaptation for flood prevention measures12. Adaptation strategies like pipe enlargement and local infiltration can be used to integrate open drainage basins in urban recreational areas58. Sustainable flood management should include the present, near future (50 years), and future (100 years) period. Present flood management can incorporate modern online monitoring systems to predict flood inundation at the catchment scale. Such systems should include an online rainfall monitoring system with high accuracy and short time steps (10 minutes or 1 hour) for the entire catchment, an online water-level monitoring system for the upper stream and an online water depth monitoring system for urban areas. Near-future flood management should provide flood risk analysis at the catchment scale and flood inundation simulation of urban areas based on extreme rainfall for more than 100 years return period. Green roofs and vertical greening, rainfall harvesting systems and underground water storage offer opportunities to protect prone areas. For the future, reforestation in urban areas and upper stream reaches as well as sustainable dam construction in appropriate locations can contribute to sustainable flood management.
This study presents a flood inundation model with acceptable calibration results compared with referenced water depth. Four types of historical and extreme rainfall yield different depths and area of flood inundation in the Hanoi center area. Higher intensity extreme rainfall can cause higher water depths and a wide inundation area. Reservoirs play an important role in reducing flood inundation risk in urban areas. Pump systems, green roofs and vertical greening systems, rainfall harvesting systems, and underground water storage systems offer the potential to reduce water depth and inundation area. Sustainable urban flood management should be integrated into catchment management, flood management infrastructure construction, online monitoring systems, flood inundation modelling, early warning systems and urban development plans. This study could be improved by taking more observed water depth data to calibrate the flood inundation model. Climate and environmental change should be considered in future studies. Further research should investigate the effect of intensity and patten of extreme rainfall on inundation depth and area.
Methodology
FLO-2D Model
Flo-2D model software, developed by O’Brien et al. (1993), can be used for the simulation of floods and debris flows. This model has been applied widely for flood risk management, urban floods, mudflows, and debris flows. Flo-2D comes in two version, the Flo-2D Basic Model and Flo-2D Pro Model. The Flo-2D Pro Model is a professional model with more sophisticated attributes, including storm drain modeling with surface-water interface, dam and levee breach, groundwater exchange with surface water, sediment transport, mud and debris flows. In this study, Flo-2D Pro was used for simulating flood inundation under four extreme rainfall types. The two-dimensional governing equations are the continuity Equation (1) and dynamic wave momentum Equations (2) and (3):
1 |
2 |
3 |
where d is the flow depth, t is time, Wx and Wy are depth-averaged velocity components along the x and y coordinates, g is gravitational acceleration, e is the excess rainfall intensity which may be nonzero on the flow surface59. The friction slope components Lfx and Lfy, bed slope Lox and Loy, pressure gradient, convective and local acceleration terms are presented in Equations (2) and (3).
Historical and Designed Future Extreme Rainfall
This study uses four historical and extreme rainfall events for rainfall input. Four historical and extreme rainfall events are designated R1, R2, R3 and R4 in Fig. 3. R1 is the actual precipitation of the 2008 Vietnam Flood (October 31, 2008 to November 2, 2008) used for model calibration. R2 is the actual Hanoi precipitation of the historical recorded two-day maximum precipitation for the period of November 9 to 10, 1984 for historical reference (1961–2008). R3 and R4 are designed to three-day duration precipitation events to estimate the most extreme flood inundation conditions. R3 used the Frechet 3P probability distribution function to calculate the probable precipitation within return period of 200 years. Observed daily precipitation data (1961–2008) from the LANG station in Hanoi was used to analyze the probable precipitation R3 using the Standard least square criterion (SLSC) goodness of fit test. Annual maximum three-day precipitation with 200-year return period was selected for extreme rainfall conditions of R3. Extreme rainfall event R4 used the probable maximum precipitation method to get the physical probable boundary of precipitation for Hanoi. Figure 6 presents all four rainfall scenarios. Precipitation for one day is assumed to have fixed intensity per hour (one-day precipitation/24 hours).
Frame work of flood inundation assessment
Figure 7 shows the framework for flood inundation assessment under four historical and extreme rainfall events in this study. The framework of this study is divided into three parts: data preparation, model application, and result comparison.
Data preparation. High resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM), land use, rainfall, and other observed data was collected for this study. The high-resolution DEM data was converted into ArcInfo ASCII grid elevation data. The land use map is assigned Manning n values and infiltration-related parameters based on previous studies and the Flo-2D Pro manual60. We selected four historical and extreme rainfall events which were explained in Section 4.2. Observed data for model calibration was based on referenced photos taken during the 2008 flood events. We judged the referenced water depth for comparison to the simulated water depth.
Model application. Elevation input data and hydrological parameters were assigned for each grid cell. The elevation of grid cells for the river channels was modified from upstream to downstream. Infiltration of each grid cell is based on the Green Ampt method61. The flood inundation model was rerun using the different rainfall scenarios. The pump station location and capacity were input to the model.
Result comparison. Simulated water depth of 2008 historical flood event was compared with the referenced photos for calibration. The fixed flood inundation model was used to analyze water depth and inundation area under 3 extreme rainfall types. The simulation results under four historical and extreme rainfall were compared in this study.
Acknowledgements
Financial support came from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (300102298302), One Hundred Talent Plan of Shaanxi Province, and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant Number 41302207, Sophia University Research Branding Project (adopted in 2016): Trans-disciplinary and Trans-national Research Program for Achieving Regional Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through River Basin Environment Conservation and Management. We also appreciate the data collection support from Prof. Phan Van-Tan and Dr. Nguyen Y-Nhu, at the Faculty of Hydrology, Meteorology and Oceanography, VNU University of Science.
Author Contributions
Pingping Luo designed this manuscript. Pingping Luo, Dengrui Mu and Han Xue wrote this manuscript. Han Xue, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Kha Dang-Dinh collected the data and organized the field survey. Kaoru Takara, Daniel Nover, Geoffrey Schladow, Thanh Ngo-Duc made scientific comments on this manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Pingping Luo, Email: lpprobert@126.com.
Han Xue, Email: xuehan@sophia.ac.jp.
References
- 1.Field, C. B. et al. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2012).
- 2.Duan W, et al. Anomalous atmospheric events leading to Kyushu’s flash floods, July 11–14, 2012. Natural Hazards. 2014;73(3):1255–1267. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1134-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Duan W, et al. Floods and associated socioeconomic damages in China over the last century. Natural Hazards. 2016;82(1):401–413. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2207-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huu BT, Ngoc QL, Thi THL, Thi DHT, Debarati GS. Impacts of flood on health: epidemiologic evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Global Health Action. 2011;4(1):6356. doi: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.6356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nabangchang O, Allaire M, Leangcharoen P, Jarungrattanapong R, Whittington D. Economic costs incurred by households in the 2011 greater bangkok flood. Water Resources Research. 2015;51(1):58–77. doi: 10.1002/2014WR015982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hammond MJ, Chen AS, Djordjević S, Butler D, Mark O. Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Urban Water Journal. 2015;12(1):14–29. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_China_floods, China floods, Accessed on December 25, 2017 (2017).
- 8.Cherqui F, Belmeziti A, Granger D, Sourdril A, Le GP. Assessing urban potential flooding risk and identifying effective risk-reduction measures. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;514:418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luino F, Turconi L, Petrea C, Nigrelli G. Uncorrected land-use planning highlighted by flooding: the Alba case study (Piedmont, Italy) Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012;12:2329–2346. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-2329-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Villarini G, et al. Flood frequency analysis for nonstationary annual peak records in an urban drainage basin. Advances in Water Resources. 2009;32(8):1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang H, et al. The changing pattern of urban flooding in Guangzhou, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;622–623:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bouwer LM, Bubeck P, Aerts JC. Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area. Global Environmental Change. 2010;20(3):463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Madsen H, Lawrence D, Lang M, Martinkova M, Kjeldsen TR. Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in europe. Journal of Hydrology. 2014;519:3634–3650. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mirza MMQ. Global warming and changes in the probability of occurrence of floods in bangladesh and implications. Global Environmental Change. 2002;12(2):127–138. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00002-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sofia G, Roder G, Fontana GD, Tarolli P. Flood dynamics in urbanised landscapes: 100 years of climate and humans’interaction. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:40527. doi: 10.1038/srep40527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. A national scale flood hazard mapping methodology: the case of greece - protection and adaptation policy approaches. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;441:601–602. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanoue M, Hirabayashi Y, Ikeuchi H. Global-scale river flood vulnerability in the last 50 years. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:36021. doi: 10.1038/srep36021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O’Connor JE, Costa JE. Spatial distribution of the largest rainfall‐runoff floods from basins between 2.6 and 26,000 km2 in the united states and puerto rico. Water Resources Research. 2004;40(1):62–74. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duan JG, et al. Framework for Incorporating Climate Change on Flood Magnitude and Frequency Analysis in the Upper Santa Cruz River. Journal of Hydrology. 2017;549:194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kunkel KE, Changnon SA, Angel JR. Climatic aspects of the 1993 upper mississippi river basin flood. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2010;75(5):811–974. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<0811:CAOTUM>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang J, Hall MJ. Regional flood frequency analysis for the gan-ming river basin in china. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;296:98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhou, X., Bai, Z. & Yang, Y. Linking trends in urban extreme rainfall to urban flooding in China. International Journal of Climatology. 10.1002/joc.5107 (2017).
- 23.Chen J, Hill AA, Urbano LD. A gis-based model for urban flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology. 2009;373:184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burn DH. Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach. Water Resources Research. 1990;26(10):2257–2265. doi: 10.1029/WR026i010p02257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grimaldi S, Serinaldi F. Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources. 2006;29(8):1155–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smith A, Sampson C, Bates P. Regional flood frequency analysis at the global scale. Water Resources Research. 2015;51(1):539–553. doi: 10.1002/2014WR015814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yan, L., Xiong, L., Liu, D., Hu, T. & Xu, C. Y. Frequency analysis of nonstationary annual maximum flood series using the time‐varying two‐component mixture distributions. Hydrological Processes. 31(1) (2017).
- 28.Pappenberger F, Beven KJ, Ratto M, Matgen P. Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models. Advances in Water Resources. 2008;31(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Younis J. Lisflood: a gis‐based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2010;24:189–212. doi: 10.1080/13658810802549154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically based distributed hydrologic model. Hydrological Processes. 2015;14(3):497–519. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000228)14:3<497::AID-HYP951>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schumann JP, et al. A first large‐scale flood inundation forecasting model. Water Resources Research. 2013;49(10):6248–6257. doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wardah T, Bakar SHA, Bardossy A, Maznorizan M. Use of geostationary meteorological satellite images in convective rain estimation for flash-flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology. 2008;356(3–4):283–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Papa, F., Prigent, C. & Rossow, W. B. Ob’ river flood inundations from satellite observations: a relationship with winter snow parameters and river runoff. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 112(D18) (2007).
- 34.Adler RF. Evaluation of a satellite-based global flood monitoring system. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2010;31(14):3763–3782. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.483489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.García-Pintado J, et al. Satellite-supported flood forecasting in river networks: a real case study. Journal of Hydrology. 2015;523:706–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sayama, T., Tatebe, Y. & Tanaka, S. An emergency response-type rainfall-runoff-inundation simulation for 2011 thailand floods. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 69(1) (2015).
- 37.Mishra, B. K. et al. Assessment of future flood inundations under climate and land use change scenarios in the ciliwung river basin, jakarta. Journal of Flood Risk Management (2017).
- 38.Hu M, et al. Evaluation of low impact development approach for mitigating flood inundation at a watershed scale in china. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;193:430–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Risi RD, et al. Flood risk assessment for informal settlements. Natural Hazards. 2013;69(1):1003–1032. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0749-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mtamba J, Velde RVD, Ndomba P, Zoltán V, Mtalo F. Use of radarsat-2 and landsat tm images for spatial parameterization of manning’s roughness coefficient in hydraulic modeling. Remote Sensing. 2015;7(1):836–864. doi: 10.3390/rs70100836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dimitriadis P, et al. Comparative evaluation of 1d and quasi-2d hydraulic models based on benchmark and real-world applications for uncertainty assessment in flood mapping. Journal of Hydrology. 2016;534:478–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huang Y, Qin X. Uncertainty analysis for flood inundation modelling with a random floodplain roughness field. Environmental Systems Research. 2014;3(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/2193-2697-3-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen T, Yen M, Tsay J, Tan Thanh NT, Alpert J. Synoptic Development of the Hanoi Heavy Rainfall Event of 30–31 October 2008: Multiple-Scale Processes. Monthly Weather Review. 2012;140(4):1219–1240. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00111.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Marcussen H, Dalsgaard A, Holm PE. Content, distribution and fate of 33 elements in sediments of rivers receiving wastewater in hanoi, vietnam. Environmental Pollution. 2008;155(1):41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Duong TT, Feurtet-Mazel A, Coste M, Dang DK, Boudou A. Dynamics of diatom colonization process in some rivers influenced by urban pollution (hanoi, vietnam) Ecological Indicators. 2007;7(4):839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). Accessing on October 26, 2015, https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/SRTM1Arc (2015).
- 47.Duan W, et al. Changes of precipitation amounts and extremes over Japan between 1901 and 2012 and their connection to climate indices. Climate Dynamics. 2015;45(7):1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Balistrocchi M, Bacchi B. Derivation of flood frequency curves through a bivariate rainfall distribution based on copula functions: application to an urban catchment in northern Italy’s climate. Hydrology Research. 2017;48(3):749–762. doi: 10.2166/nh.2017.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lana X, et al. Rainfall intensity patterns derived from the urban network of Barcelona (NE Spain) Theoretical & Applied Climatology. 2017;3–4:1–19. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Luo P, He B, Duan W, Takara K, Nover D. Impact assessment of rainfall scenarios and land-use change on hydrologic response using synthetic Area IDF curves. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2015;11:S84–S97. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Luo P, Takara K, Apip He B, Nover D. Palaeoflood simulation of the Kamo River basin using a grid‐cell distributed rainfall run‐off model. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2014;7(2):182–192. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Acreman, M. et al. Managed flood releases from reservoirs: issues and guidance. Report to DFID and the World Commission on Dams. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. Wallingford, UK, p86 (2000).
- 53.Georgakakos AP, et al. Value of adaptive water resources management in northern california under climatic variability and change: reservoir management. Journal of Hydrology. 2012;412(1):34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mateo CM, et al. Assessing the impacts of reservoir operation to floodplain inundation by combining hydrological, reservoir management, and hydrodynamic models. Water Resources Research. 2014;50(9):7245–7266. doi: 10.1002/2013WR014845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou Y, Guo S. Incorporating ecological requirement into multipurpose reservoir operating rule curves for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Hydrology. 2013;498(12):153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Opperman JJ, et al. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science. 2009;326(5959):1487–1488. doi: 10.1126/science.1178256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Plate EJ. Flood risk and flood management. Journal of Hydrology. 2002;267(1):2–11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00135-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhou Q, Panduro TE, Thorsen BJ, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K. Adaption to extreme rainfall with open urban drainage system: An integrated hydrological cost-benefit analysis. Environmental management. 2013;51(3):586–601. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-0010-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.O’Brien JS, Julien PY, Fullerton WT. Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. Journal of hydraulic engineering. 1993;119(2):244–261. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.FLO-2D Software, Inc.: FLO-2D reference manual, Version 2009 (2009).
- 61.Green WH, Ampt. G. Studies of soil physics, part I. The flow of air and water through soils. J. Ag. Sci. 1911;4:1–24. [Google Scholar]