ABSTRACT
New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) is a subclass B1 metallo-β-lactamase that exhibits a broad spectrum of activity against β-lactam antibiotics. Here we report the kinetic study of 6 Q119X variants obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of NDM-1. All Q119X variants were able to hydrolyze carbapenems, penicillins and first-, second-, third-, and fourth-generation cephalosporins very efficiently. In particular, Q119E, Q119Y, Q119V, and Q119K mutants showed improvements in kcat/Km values for penicillins, compared with NDM-1. The catalytic efficiencies of the Q119K variant for benzylpenicillin and carbenicillin were about 65- and 70-fold higher, respectively, than those of NDM-1. The Q119K and Q119Y enzymes had kcat/Km values for ceftazidime about 25- and 89-fold higher, respectively, than that of NDM-1.
KEYWORDS: NDM, kinetic, metallo-β-lactamase
TEXT
New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) plays a key role in antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. NDM-1-producing bacteria have been identified from both nosocomial and community-acquired infections, including urinary and pulmonary tract infections, peritonitis, septicemia, and osteomyelitis, throughout the world (1–4). The rapid emergence of this enzyme in multiple enteric bacteria is due to the favorable genetic characteristics of the producing plasmids. Multiple antibiotic resistance genes were found to be harbored by plasmids carrying the blaNDM-1 determinant (5, 6). Therefore, NDM-1-producing strains showed high levels of resistance to a wide range of β-lactams, except monobactams, and also other antibiotic families (7). Structurally, the NDM-1 enzyme displays the typical αβ/βα sandwich architecture (8–11). The active site of NDM-1 is surrounded by several loops that are responsible for substrate binding and specificity and by two zinc ion binding sites, referred to as sites 1 and 2 (9). The two zinc ions promote substrate catalysis; Zn-1 is tetracoordinated by the imidazole groups of three histidine residues, H116, H118, and H196, and one water molecule, whereas Zn-2 is pentacoordinated by H263, D120, and C221 (BBL numbering [12]) and two water molecules. NDM-1 displays 32% sequence identity to the most common metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), IMP-1 and VIM-2 (9). Several studies demonstrated that, in MBLs, D120 plays an important role in orienting the active site hydroxide ion, which serves as a general base (13). A recent study of mutagenesis at position 120 in NDM-1 validated the hypothesis that this residue acts as a strong Zn-2 ligand and is involved in the interaction with substrate (13).
In the present study, to better understand the function of residue 119 in the NDM-1 enzyme, site saturation mutagenesis was performed on the blaNDM-1 gene (codons 247 to 249 [CAG]) to generate NDM-1 variants, named Q119X. The codon was randomized using overlap-extension PCR, as described previously (14), with the pFM-NDM-1 plasmid as the template (15). Mutations were introduced into a PCR amplicon using the mutagenic primers Q119X_for (5′-CTCACGCGCATNNNGACAAGATG) and Q119X_rev (5′-CATCTTGTCNNNATGCGCGTGAG), where N represents any of the four base pairs at the codon position to be randomized. The external primers NDM_for (5′-GGGGGGGTACCCATATGGGTGAAATCCGCCCGA) and NDM_rev (5′-GGGGGGAGCTCGAGTCAGCGCAGCTTGTCGGC) (KpnI/NdeI and SacI/XhoI restriction sites are shown in bold) were used to amplify the entire blaNDM-1 gene. The amplification product, digested with KpnI and SacI, was ligated into the pBC-SK(+) Bluescript vector, and the ligation product was transformed into Escherichia coli XL-1 Bluescript cells. Functional random mutants were selected by growth in the presence of chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml), ampicillin (100 μg/ml), and meropenem (1 μg/ml) and then were sequenced (ABI Prism 3500 eight-capillary automated sequencer; Life Technologies, Monza, Italy) to identify the amino acid substitutions at the randomized position. Among functional clones, 11 NDM-1 mutants were identified, i.e., Q119I, Q119S, Q119L, Q119Y, Q119C, Q119T, Q119F, Q119K, Q119V, Q119E, and Q119M. The phenotypic profiles were characterized by the microdilution method using a bacterial inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/ml of E. coli XL-1/pBC-SK-Q119X, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) performance standards (16). The antimicrobial susceptibility to penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems was tested for all recombinant strains, including wild-type E. coli XL-1/pBC-SK-NDM-1 and E. coli XL-1/pBC-SK (Table 1). Like NDM-1, all recombinant mutants exhibited resistance to penicillins, cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime. Only E. coli XL-1/pBC-SK-Q119E showed a MIC value of 8 μg/ml for cefepime. For cefoxitin, all recombinant strains showed MIC values higher than that of E. coli XL-1/pBC-SK-NDM-1. For all strains tested, the imipenem and meropenem MIC values ranged from 1 μg/ml to 16 μg/ml (Table 1). The mutants were categorized on the basis of MIC values and, in this study, only the following 6 NDM-1 variants were investigated on the basis of their phenotypic profiles: Q119C, Q119F, Q119E, Q119Y, Q119V, and Q119K. For overexpression of the 6 NDM-1 variants, the blaQ119X mutant genes, without signal peptide, were subcloned into the pET-24a(+) vector and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). Purification of the different NDM-1 mutants was performed as described previously (15). From 400 ml of an overnight culture in tryptic soya broth (TSB), we obtained about 5 mg of each NDM-1 mutant. Kinetic experiments were performed by following the hydrolysis of each substrate at 25°C in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7). The data were collected with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 25 spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer Italia, Monza, Italy). Steady-state kinetic analyses were performed under initial-rate conditions using the Hanes plot linearization method (16). For Km values of ≤10 μM, the Km values were determined as Ki values, using nitrocefin as the reporter substrate (17). Each kinetic value is the mean of five different measurements; errors were <5%. In Table 2, we show the Km, kcat, and kcat/Km values for Q119C, Q119F, Q119E, Q119Y, Q119V, and Q119K variants, compared to NDM-1 (data for NDM-1 were taken from reference 15), with some carbapenems, penicillins, and cephalosporins.
TABLE 1.
Antibiotic | MIC (μg/ml) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDM-1 | Q119C/Q119S | Q119E | Q119K | Q119F/Q119T | Q119Y/Q119I/Q119L | Q119V | pBC-SK | |
Benzylpenicillin | 512 | 64 | 64 | >512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 0.250 |
Piperacillin | 256 | >512 | >512 | >512 | >512 | >512 | >512 | 0.500 |
Amoxicillin | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 0.500 |
Imipenem | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 0.125 |
Meropenem | 2 | 16 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | <0.0625 |
Cefepime | 32 | 32 | 8 | >128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | <0.0625 |
Cefoxitin | 8 | 64 | 32 | 128 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 0.125 |
Cefazolin | 128 | 256 | 256 | >256 | 256 | 256 | >256 | <0.0625 |
Cefotaxime | 128 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | <0.0625 |
Ceftazidime | 256 | 128 | 128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | <0.0625 |
TABLE 2.
Substrate and parametera | NDM-1b | Q119C | Q119F | Q119E | Q119Y | Q119V | Q119K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imipenem | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 64 | 69 | 336 | 41 | 79 | 229 | 393 |
Km (μM) | 35 | 50 | 157 | 40 | 30 | 65 | 90 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 1.83 | 1.38 | 2.14 | 1.02 | 2.63 | 3.52 | 4.37 |
Meropenem | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 75 | 252 | 1500 | 82 | 561 | 269 | 357 |
Km (μM) | 80 | 100 | 252 | 146 | 105 | 20 | 37 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.94 | 2.52 | 5.95 | 0.56 | 5.34 | 13.45 | 9.65 |
Benzylpenicillin | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 105 | 100 | 166 | 100 | 34 | 231 | 414 |
Km (μM) | 250 | 71 | 89 | 5c | 8c | 45 | 15 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.42 | 1.41 | 1.86 | 20.0 | 4.25 | 5.10 | 27.6 |
Carbenicillin | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 108 | 52 | 158 | 234 | 216 | 267 | 929 |
Km (μM) | 285 | 59 | 131 | 18 | 31 | 32 | 35 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.38 | 0.88 | 1.21 | 13.00 | 6.97 | 8.34 | 26.54 |
Cefazolin | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 42 | 48 | 169 | 63 | 561 | 269 | 125 |
Km (μM) | 20 | 11 | 27 | 4c | 105 | 20 | 32 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 2.10 | 4.36 | 6.26 | 15.75 | 5.34 | 13.45 | 3.90 |
Cefoxitin | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 23 | 99 | 152 | 64 | 85 | 193 | 58 |
Km (μM) | 26 | 23 | 21 | 23 | 17 | 18 | 49 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.88 | 4.30 | 7.24 | 2.78 | 5.00 | 10.72 | 1.18 |
Cefotaxime | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 20 | 43 | 59 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 89 |
Km (μM) | 14 | 7c | 6c | 2c | 2c | 10c | 3c |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 1.43 | 6.14 | 9.83 | 2.00 | 3.50 | 2.00 | 29.67 |
Ceftazidime | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 18.5 | 74 | 257 | 14 | 68 | 7 | 106 |
Km (μM) | 50 | 163 | 403 | 140 | 2c | 3c | 11 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 34.00 | 2.33 | 9.64 |
Cefepime | |||||||
kcat (s−1) | 13 | 22 | 67 | 18 | 30 | 71 | 60 |
Km (μM) | 35 | 30 | 16 | 40 | 4c | 10c | 18 |
kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | 0.37 | 0.73 | 4.19 | 0.45 | 7.50 | 7.10 | 3.33 |
Imipenem and meropenem were good substrates for all Q119X variants analyzed, with kcat values higher than that calculated for NDM-1 (except for Q119E with imipenem). The Q119F variant showed a kcat value for meropenem of 1,500 s−1, about 20-fold higher than the NDM-1 value. Regarding penicillins, the Q119X variants showed lower Km values toward both benzylpenicillin and carbenicillin, with values ranging from 5- to 50-fold less than the NDM-1 values. The kcat values for benzylpenicillin were quite similar to the NDM-1 value except for Q119Y, with a kcat value about 3-fold lower than the NDM-1 value, and Q119K, with a kcat value 4-fold higher than the NDM-1 value. Concerning carbenicillin, the Q119X variants (not including Q119C) showed higher kcat values.
All NDM-1 variants hydrolyzed first-, second-, third-, and fourth-generation cephalosporins very efficiently (Table 2). Indeed, the kcat values calculated for cefazolin, cefoxitin, and cefepime were higher than the NDM-1 values. Differences in the kcat values determined with cefotaxime were observed among the Q119X variants. The Q119V variant exhibited the same kcat value as NDM-1, the Q119E and Q119Y variants showed lower kcat values, and the Q119C, Q119F, and Q119K variants showed higher kcat values. Regarding ceftazidime, we observed different behavior among the Q119X variants. For example, the Q119Y showed a kcat of 68 s−1, a Km of 2 μM, and a kcat/Km value about 10-fold higher than the NDM-1 value. Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, was more stable than cefazolin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime with all NDM-1 variants. For all Q119X variants (with rare exceptions), increases in the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km), compared with NDM-1, were detected with all β-lactams examined (Table 3). In particular, the Q119E, Q119Y, Q119V, and Q119K variants showed significant improvements in kcat/Km for penicillins, due to lower Km values. The catalytic efficiencies of the Q119K variant for benzylpenicillin and carbenicillin were about 65- and 70-fold higher, respectively, than those of NDM-1. The Q119K and Q119Y enzymes had kcat/Km values for ceftazidime about 25- and 89-fold higher, respectively, than that of NDM-1. The Q119E variant showed high catalytic efficiencies with penicillins but lower efficiencies with carbapenems and ceftazidime. The replacement of glutamine (Q) with cysteine (C), phenylalanine (F), glutamic acid (E), tyrosine (Y), valine (V), or lysine (K) considerably increased the activity of NDM-1 for some β-lactams, such as benzylpenicillin, carbenicillin, meropenem (except Q119E), ceftazidime (particularly true for Q119Y and Q119K), and cefepime (particularly true for Q119Y and Q119V). However, no clear correlation between the MIC values and the kinetic data could be observed, mainly because the MIC values for the majority of substrates did not differ substantially between wild-type NDM-1 and the mutants. For cefazolin, cefoxitin, and meropenem, the Q119V variant was always the most efficient enzyme (up to 10-fold greater than NDM-1), followed by Q119F and Q119E (about 2- to 5-fold greater than NDM-1). For benzylpenicillin, carbenicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and meropenem, Q119K was the most efficient enzyme, with catalytic efficiencies about 66-, 69-, 20-, 25-, and 10-fold higher, respectively, than those of NDM-1.
TABLE 3.
Substrate |
kcat/Km for Q119X variant/kcat/Km for NDM-1 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q119C | Q119F | Q119E | Q119Y | Q119V | Q119K | |
Benzylpenicillin | 3.4 | 4.4 | 47.6 | 10.1 | 12.1 | 65.7 |
Carbenicillin | 2.3 | 3.2 | 34.2 | 18.3 | 21.9 | 69.8 |
Imipenem | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 |
Meropenem | 2.7 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 5.7 | 14.3 | 10.3 |
Cefazolin | 2.1 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 6.4 | 1.9 |
Cefoxitin | 4.9 | 8.2 | 3.2 | 5.7 | 12.2 | 1.3 |
Cefotaxime | 4.3 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 20.7 |
Ceftazidime | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 89.5 | 6.1 | 25.4 |
Cefepime | 2.0 | 11.3 | 1.2 | 20.3 | 19.2 | 9.0 |
Residue 119 is positioned in the L5 loop, which includes important catalytic residues such as H116, H118, and D120. Q119 is adjacent to D120 and we presume that it could play an important role in the activities of NDM-1. Structural studies of NDM-1 (18) suggested that Q119 maintains the correct orientation of H118 and D120 in the Zn-1 coordination and therefore plays a major role in the catalytic properties of NDM-1. The study by Chiou et al. demonstrated that Q119D and Q119A mutants showed reduced carbapenem, ampicillin, and cefepime MIC values and Q119D showed reductions in kcat values for the same β-lactams (18); this seems to be a discrepancy with respect to the results obtained with our mutants, for which substitutions at position 119 led to enzymes with major activity, compared to the wild-type NDM-1 enzyme. The results obtained in the present study suggest that the involvement of residue 119 in NDM-1 activity is related to the amino acid structure. Our results highlight this position as a good candidate for the evolution of the NDM MBLs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Anna Toso (Toronto Catholic District School Board, Toronto, Canada) for the language revision of the manuscript.
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Groundwater PW, Xu S, Lai F, Váradi L, Tan J, Perry JD, Hibbs DE. 2016. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1: structure, inhibitors and detection of producers. Future Med Chem 8:993–1012. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2016-0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang LH, Liu PP, Wei DD, Liu Y, Wan LG, Xiang TX, Zhang YJ. 2016. Clinical isolates of uropathogenic Escherichia coli ST131 producing NDM-7 metallo-β-lactamase in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 48:41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Compain F, Vandenberghe A, Gominet M, Genel N, Lebeaux D, Ramahefasolo A, Podglajen I, Decré D. 2017. Primary osteomyelitis caused by an NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae strain of the highly virulent sequence type 23. Emerg Microbes Infect 6:e57. doi: 10.1038/emi.2017.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khan AU, Maryam L, Zarrilli R. 2017. Structure, genetics and worldwide spread of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM): a threat to public health. BMC Microbiol 17:101–112. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1012-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Toleman M, Karthikeyan K, Sharma M, Chaudhary U, Thirunarayan M, Krishnan P, Walsh T. 2010. Recent epidemic emergence of blaNDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase in enteric organisms from India is mostly linked to A/C plasmids. Clin Microbiol Infect 16(Suppl 2):S30. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bush K. 2010. Alarming β-lactamase-mediated resistance in multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Walsh TR. 2009. Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.King D, Strynadka N. 2011. Crystal structure of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase reveals molecular basis for antibiotic resistance. Protein Sci 20:1484–1491. doi: 10.1002/pro.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang HM, Hau Q. 2011. Crystal structure of NDM-1 reveals a common β-lactam hydrolysis mechanism. FASEB J 25:2574–2582. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-184036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim Y, Cunningham MA, Mire J, Tesar C, Sacchettini J, Joachimiak A. 2013. NDM-1, the ultimate promiscuous enzyme: substrate recognition and catalytic mechanism. FASEB J 27:1917–1927. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-224014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guo Y, Wang J, Niu G, Shui W, Sun Y, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Yang C, Lou Z, Rao Z. 2011. A structural view of the antibiotic degradation enzyme NDM-1 from a superbug. Prot Cell 2:384–394. doi: 10.1007/s13238-011-1055-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garau G, Garcia-Sàez I, Bebrone C, Anne C, Mercuri PS, Galleni M, Frère JM, Dideberg O. 2004. Update of the standard numbering scheme for class B β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2347–2349. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2347-2349.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen J, Chen H, Zhu T, Zhou D, Zhang F, Lao X, Zheng H. 2014. Asp120Asn mutation impairs the catalytic activity of NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase: experimental and computational study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:6709–6716. doi: 10.1039/c3cp55069a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using a polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Marcoccia F, Bottoni C, Sabatini A, Colapietro M, Mercuri PS, Galleni M, Kerff F, Matagne A, Celenza G, Amicosante G, Perilli M. 2016. Kinetic study of laboratory mutants of NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase and the importance of an isoleucine at position 35. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2366–2372. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00531-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard— 9th ed Document M07-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Segel IH. 1976. Enzyme kinetics. Biochemical calculations: how to solve mathematical problems in general biochemistry, 2nd ed, p 236–241 John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chiou J, Leung TY, Chen S. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of substrate recognition and specificity of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5372–5378. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01977-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.De Meester F, Joris B, Reckinger G. 1987. Automated analysis of enzyme inactivation phenomena: application to β-lactamases and DD-peptidases. Biochem Pharmacol 36:2393–2403. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(87)90609-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]