This prospective study shows that the rate of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAF) in an immunocompromised Indian patient population with invasive aspergillosis (IA) is low, 6/706 (0.8%). This low rate supports the continued use of voriconazole as the first line of treatment.
KEYWORDS: immunocompromised hosts, invasive aspergillosis, risk factor, antifungal susceptibility testing, azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, cyp51A mutations, India
ABSTRACT
This prospective study shows that the rate of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAF) in an immunocompromised Indian patient population with invasive aspergillosis (IA) is low, 6/706 (0.8%). This low rate supports the continued use of voriconazole as the first line of treatment. However, the ARAF isolates from India in this study exhibited three kinds of unreported cyp51A mutations, of which two were at hot spots, G54R and P216L, while one was at codon Y431C.
TEXT
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a disease of concern, as it is a leading cause of death in patients with hematological malignancies and in transplant recipients (1). Voriconazole is considered the drug of choice for primary therapy in IA cases (especially with cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis), while liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), caspofungin, and posaconazole are preferred as salvage therapy drugs (1). Antifungal drug resistance has mainly been reported among the triazoles (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) (2–4).
In the resistant isolates, further studies of mutations provide a better understanding of their associations with particular drug susceptibility patterns. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most commonly isolated resistant species, and modifications of the target gene of triazoles, the cyp51A gene, have been found to be correlated with specific triazole resistance phenotypes (5–7). European data, especially that from the Netherlands, has added extensively to the subject (7–13). However, until this date, there are only two reports from India, wherein authors have mainly found TR34/L98H mutations in clinically isolated azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAF) strains (14, 15). While the world discusses ways to combat this deadly fungus (ARAF) that infects humans, the lack of data from India makes it difficult to comprehend its severity from the perspective of our country. Thus, this work is aimed at understanding the prevalence of ARAF and associated mutations in clinically suspected immunocompromised patients in India.
In this prospective study, a total of 1,416 azole-naive immunocompromised patients suspected of IA were enrolled over a period of 4 years (2012 to 2016). They were classified using the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) diagnostic criteria, modified by including nonspecific radiological findings (16). There were 706/1,416 (49.8%) IA cases (8 proven IA and 698 probable IA) with 122/706 (17.3%) culture positivity and 6/706 (0.8%) ARAF, and there were 710/1,416 (50.2%) cases with no IA (444 possible IA and 46 [46/710; 6.5%] colonization cases with repeat isolation of same Aspergillus species in culture and direct examination negative for septate hyphae) and no ARAF. One probable reason for this high number of IA cases could have been a potential bias in selection of clinically suspected fungal cases. These patients had not responded to antibiotics for >72 h after admission. The isolates were identified following conventional mycological procedures, including direct specimen microscopy and growth on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA) at a range of temperatures, namely, 25°C, 37°C, and 45°C (17, 18). Direct examination of specimens revealed that 128/1,416 (9%) tested positive for hyaline septate hyphae. However, the culture grew Aspergillus spp. in 122/1,416 (8.6%) clinically correlated cases (97 Aspergillus flavus, 22 Aspergillus fumigatus, two Aspergillus terreus and one Aspergillus niger) and were tested for their susceptibility profiles. For ARAF screening, all 32 A. fumigatus isolates (22 [68.7%] clinically correlated and 10 [37.5%] colonizers) were tested using the standard broth microdilution assays with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) approved standard M38-A2 and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (E.Def. 9.3) guidelines for molds (19, 20). For CLSI methodology, the proposed epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) were followed, namely, itraconazole, 1 μg/ml; voriconazole, 1 μg/ml; posaconazole, 0.5 μg/ml; and amphotericin B, 4 μg/ml. Similar cutoffs were followed for micafungin as that reported for caspofungin, 0.25 μg/ml (21, 22). For EUCAST methodology, the breakpoints were followed as per the clinical breakpoints (version 8.1) published on EUCAST website, namely, for amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole, ≥2 μg/ml, and for the remaining drugs, i.e., posaconazole, caspofungin, and micafungin, ≥0.25 μg/ml (23). Detailed statistical analysis showed a high recorded agreement (94 to 98%) between the two methodologies. However, intraclass coefficients (ICCs) were found to be 0.97 to 0.98 for the azoles and polyene tested but were found to be poor for the echinocandins tested (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Susceptibilities of Aspergillus fumigatus to various antifungals and concordance and intraclass coefficients between CLSI M38-A2 and EUCAST guidelines
| Antifungal agents | CLSI (%) (n = 32) |
EUCAST (%) (n = 32) |
Concordance (%) | ICC (95% CI)a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susceptible (no. [%]) | Resistant (no. [%]) | Wild type (no. [%]) | Non-wild type (no. [%]) | |||
| Itraconazole | 26 (81.25) | 6 (18.75) | 26 (81.25) | 6 (18.75) | 98 | 0.98 (0.86–0.99) |
| Voriconazole | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 97 | 0.98 (0.93–0.99) |
| Posaconazole | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 94 | 0.96 (0.91–0.98) |
| Amphotericin B | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 31 (96.87) | 1 (3.12) | 97 | 0.97 (0.90–0.99) |
| Caspofungin | 32 (100) | 0 | 32 (100) | 0 | 56 | 0.65 (0.30–0.83) |
| Micafungin | 32 (100) | 0 | 32 (100) | 0 | 56 | 0.65 (0.30–0.83) |
ICC, intraclass coefficient; CI, confidence interval.
In the study, in vitro antifungal resistance (irrespective of class of drugs) was noted in 2.3% (16/706) of IA patients, in 13.1% (16/122) of IA isolates and in 2.2% (5/229) of voriconazole-exposed IA patients (including 191 voriconazole recipients and 113 voriconazole-amphotericin B recipients) (Table 2). This high rate of resistance is in accordance with previously published literature (24, 25). It is worth noting that a much higher rate has also been previously reported (13, 26).
TABLE 2.
Proportion of in vitro antifungal resistance with regard to treatment given in this study
| Treatment | All patients |
IA patients |
IA isolation cases |
Susceptible IA isolation cases |
Resistant IA isolation cases |
A. fumigatus isolation cases |
Susceptible A. fumigatus isolation cases |
Resistant A. fumigatus isolation cases |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | Total (no. [%]) | Poor outcome (no./total, [%]) | |
| Any | 1,416 (100) | 192/1,416 (13.6) | 706 (100) | 107/706 (15.2) | 122 (100) | 44/122 (36) | 106 (100) | 32/106 (30.2) | 16 (100) | 12/16 (75) | 32 (100) | 17/32 (53) | 26 (100) | 9/26 (34.6) | 6 (100) | 4/6 (66.7) |
| None | 440 (31) | 68/440 (15.5) | 147 (20.8) | 25/147 (17) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Voriconazole | 191 (13.5) | 12/191 (6.3) | 116 (16.4) | 9/116 (7.8) | 25 (20.5) | 2/25 (8) | 23 (21.7) | 2/23 (8.7) | 2 (12.5) | 0 | 9 (28.1) | 0 | 8 (30.8) | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 |
| Amphotericin B | 352 (24.9) | 59/352 (16.8) | 183 (25.9) | 36/183 (19.7) | 36 (29.5) | 22/36 (61.1) | 28 (26.4) | 15/28 (53.4) | 8 (50) | 7/8 (88) | 9 (28.1) | 8/9 (88.9) | 7 (27) | 6/7 (85.7) | 2 (33.3) | 2/2 (100) |
| Caspofungin | 25 (1.8) | 5/25 (20) | 13 (1.8) | 2/13 (15.4) | 5 (4) | 2/5 (40) | 5 (4.7) | 2/5 (40) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.1) | 0 | 1 (3.8) | 1/1 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Amphotericin B and voriconazole | 162 (11.4) | 18/162 (11.1) | 113 (16) | 14/113 (12.4) | 27 (22.1) | 7/27 (26) | 24 (22.6) | 5/24 (20.8) | 3 (18.8) | 2/8 (66.7) | 6 (18.8) | 5/6 (83.8) | 4 (15.4) | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 1/2 (50) |
| Other drug combinations | 246 (17.4) | 30/246 (12.2) | 134 (19) | 21/134 (15.7) | 29 (23.8) | 11/29 (38) | 26 (24.5) | 8/26 (30.8) | 3 (18.8) | 3/3 (100) | 7 (1.9) | 4/7 (57.1) | 6 (23) | 2/6 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | 1/1 (100) |
Globally, there has been an alarming increase of azole resistance in A. fumigatus (2, 4, 27). From Manchester, a 2% rate of ARAF was reported in 2000 (3) whereas from 2007 to 2008 this rate increased to 15%, and later in 2009 to 20% (24, 25, 27). Similar increases were reported from the Netherlands, namely, from 2.5% in 2000 to 4.9% in 2002 and 6.6% in 2004 to 10% in 2009 (24). Azole resistance had been explored in multicenter studies, including the ARTEMIS global surveillance study, which showed a 5.8% rate of ARAF (28). In another study by the Surveillance Collaboration on Aspergillus Resistance in Europe (SCARE) network, the prevalence rate of ARAF was 3.2% (29). In this study, ARAF was seen in 6/706 (0.8%) IA cases, which validated voriconazole as the first line of drug treatment for IA in our hospital settings. Similar to our study, findings from a single center in Paris, France, found ARAF in only 1/152 (0.7%) IA cases from immunocompromised patients (30). Previously, the same French center isolated ARAF at a 1.1% rate from a specific hematological malignancy patient group (10). Geographically, a wide range of triazole resistance rates has been reported in A. fumigatus clinical isolates, including <1 to 3.6% in the United States (31, 32), 4% in China (33), 4.5% in Kuwait (34), 11% in Japan (35), and 2% in India (36). Drug-resistant IA has been associated with a high mortality rate (4, 5, 26, 37, 38).
In this study, the overall observed 30-day mortality rate was 13.6% (192/1,416) and was much lower than what has been reported in the literature (mostly ≥50%) (39–42). This may be due to reporting of a lesser time to mortality (∼1 month), whereas in most of the studies time to mortality is ≥3 months. Poor prognosis has been previously correlated with varied mycological diagnostic criteria, including culture, galactomannan antigen (GM), and PCR positivity (43–47). It has been associated with persistent higher GM values, and it was recently found to be linked with higher PCR fungal load (47).
However, among the parameters observed in this study, the 30-day outcome was notably poor in both culture-positive (44/122; 36.1%) versus culture-negative IA cases (63/584; 10.8%) and resistant versus susceptible isolation cases (Table 2). Similarly, 66.7% (4/6) of ARAF isolation cases had poor outcomes compared to 34.6% (9/26) of azole-susceptible A. fumigatus isolation cases (Table 2).
Indian data on IA mortality varies between different patient groups. In a study on acute leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients, the overall observed mortality rate was 15.3% (all causes), and according to the EORTC/MSG classification of IA cases, the mortality was 36% in possible IA, 41.1% in probable IA, and 100% in proven IA cases (48). Recently, in hematological malignancy patients, the 4-month observed mortality rate due to IA was found to be 30% (49).
The mechanisms of azole resistance in the species have been extensively studied in the Western world, and the results are alarming and call for regular surveillance worldwide. However, the only Indian clinical data are from one center, wherein a total of 14 ARAF cases, primarily having TR34/L98H mutations in their cyp51A gene, have been reported from two different studies (14, 15). The same group pioneered resistance surveillance of environmental isolates and reported major TR/L98H mutations in 44/630 ARAF isolates (42); they also reported the first TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations in 6/1,210 resistant environmental isolates (50). TR/L98H is the most common cyp51A mutation and has been previously reported in this patient population from various parts of the world, namely, Nijmegen, Netherlands (Europe) (7, 9, 12, 13); Germany (Europe) (11); Poland (Europe) (51), the United States (North America) (52); Taiwan (53); Australia (54); the Middle East (34, 55); and New Delhi, India (15). However, this mutation has been linked with the environmental spread of resistance due to the increasing use of fungicidal azoles in agricultural practices in Copenhagen, Denmark (Europe) (56); Bogotá, Colombia (Latin America) (57); Kuwait (Middle East) (34); and New Delhi, India (36).
In this study, cyp51A mutations were sought in all A. fumigatus isolates using the forward primer P450A (58) and reverse primer CYP3 R (59), yielding a PCR product of ∼1,500 bp. All of the six A. fumigatus isolates showing elevated MICs harbored mutations in the cyp51A gene, leading to azole resistance (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Characteristics of patients harboring azole-resistant A. fumigatus
| Patient ID | Sex, age (yrs)a | Date of admission | Underlying diseaseb | Clinical sample | EORTC/MSG criterion | ΔGMd | cyp51A mutatione | GenBank accession no. | MIC (μg/ml) for: |
Resistant antifungal(s)f | Antifungal treatment(s)g | 30-day outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITR | VOR | POS | ||||||||||||
| 1 | M, 18 | 16 February 2013 | ALL | BALc fluid | Probable | −1.52 | P216L | MF148150 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.06 | ITR | AMB | Died |
| 2 | M, 54 | 19 April 2014 | TB | Tissue | Proven | −0.4 | G54R | MF148151 | 4 | 4 | 0.06 | ITR, VOR | AMB, VOR | Died |
| 3 | F, 18 | 7 March 2013 | ALL | BAL fluid | Probable | −2.78 | Y431C | MF148152 | 16 | 0.5 | 2 | ITR, POS | AMB, VOR | Alive |
| 4 | M, 5.2 | 21 April 2013 | ALL | BAL fluid | Probable | −0.802 | P216L | MF148153 | 8 | 0.25 | 0.06 | ITR | AMB | Died |
| 5 | M, 6 | 19 September 2013 | TB | BAL fluid | Probable | −1.3 | Y431C | MF148154 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | ITR | AMB, CAS | Died |
| 6 | F, 5 | 11 May 2014 | CML | Sputum | Probable | −1.199 | P216L | MF148155 | 8 | 0.25 | 0.125 | ITR | VOR | Alive |
M, male; F, female.
ALL, acute lymphoid leukemia; TB, tuberculosis; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia.
BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage.
ΔGM = GM1 − GM2; GM, galactomannan antigen.
P, proline; L, leucine; G, glycine; R, arginine; Y, tyrosine; C, cysteine.
ITR, itraconazole; VOR, voriconazole; POS, posaconazole.
AMB, ampshotericin B; CAS, caspofungin.
These were azole-naive patients at the time of sampling, which suggested a possible role for environmental transmission of resistance. India being an agrarian economy, the probable role of fungicides in spreading azole resistance cannot be ruled out (24, 60). Irrespective of previous reports from azole-naive patients, none of the three kinds of mutations reported in the study have been previously linked with environmental mechanisms of resistance spread. These mutations have not yet been reported from India. However, at codon 54, a substitution to glutamic acid (G54E) had been previously reported from an environmental isolate (36) and a clinical Indian strain (15). The nonsynonymous hot spot mutation (G54R) was only seen in one isolate, whereas the common mutation observed in a conserved region, P216L, was seen in three isolates. Both of these mechanisms prevented the docking of drug molecules and thereby produced the resistant strains (7, 61). The substitution to cysteine at codon 431 has been associated with a complex resistance mechanism involving upregulation/increased expression of cyp51A (62). The prevalence of similar resistance mechanisms (G54R, Y431C, and P216L) in the clinical and environmental isolates in India should therefore be investigated by further studies.
Recently, experts had discussed the treatment options in clinical cases from regions where ARAF strains were rampant (>10%) or moderate (5 to 10%). Even though they had a difference of opinion, they agreed on the use of national epidemiology and local susceptibility data to guide the choice of treatment (63).
Due to limited resources, we could not perform short tandem repeats of Aspergillus fumigatus (STRAf) typing to compare our isolates with isolates from worldwide. Another limitation of the study was the small number of biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage samples.
In summary, this study supports the fact that azole resistant A. fumigatus is prevalent in India, which is an upsetting finding in a country where the climate supports fungal growth and antifungal drugs are expensive and mostly unaffordable. However, the low rate of ARAF in IA cases (0.8%) does not cause alarm about voriconazole as the first line of treatment. Our findings, combined with those of previous studies, emphasize antifungal susceptibility-directed treatment of IA for better management of patients and to avoid unnecessary use of toxic and expensive drugs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the patients and their relatives for providing consent for the study. Y.D. received a senior research fellowship (SRF) awarded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (fellowship 80/896/2014-ECD-I).
I.X. received micafungin from Astellas Pharma (Japan) and posaconazole from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals (USA).
The reference no. for the proposed study for approval by the ethics committee was IESC/T-357/28.09.2012, and it was approved by the ethics committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. The detailed procedure was as per institute guidelines (http://www.aiims.edu/aiims/academic/ethics-committee/forms%20in%20pdf/IEC/Format_of_Institution_Ethics_Committee_15032012.pdf.
REFERENCES
- 1.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46:327–360. doi: 10.1086/525258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Howard SJ, Cerar D, Anderson MJ, Albarrag A, Fisher MC, Pasqualotto AC, Laverdiere M, Arendrup MC, Perlin DS, Denning DW. 2009. Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1068–1076. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.090043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moore CB, Sayers N, Mosquera J, Slaven J, Denning DW. 2000. Antifungal drug resistance in Aspergillus. J Infect 41:203–220. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2000.0747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Snelders E, van der Lee HA, Kuijpers J, Rijs AJ, Varga J, Samson RA, Mellado E, Donders AR, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2008. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med 5:e219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xiao L, Madison V, Chau AS, Loebenberg D, Palermo RE, McNicholas PM. 2004. Three-dimensional models of wild-type and mutated forms of cytochrome P450 14α-sterol demethylases from Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans provide insights into posaconazole binding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:568–574. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.2.568-574.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gollapudy R, Ajmani S, Kulkarni SA. 2004. Modeling and interactions of Aspergillus fumigatus lanosterol 14-α demethylase A with azole antifungals. Bioorg Med Chem 12:2937–2950. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Snelders E, Karawajczyk A, Schaftenaar G, Verweij PE, Melchers WJG. 2010. Azole resistance profile of amino acid changes in Aspergillus fumigatus CYP51A based on protein homology modeling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2425–2430. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01599-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Diaz-Guerra TM, Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2003. A point mutation in the 14α-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1120–1224. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1120-1124.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2007. A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51A alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1897–1904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01092-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alanio A, Sitterlé E, Liance M, Farrugia C, Foulet F, Botterel F, Hicheri Y, Cordonnier C, Costa JM, Bretagne S. 2011. Low prevalence of resistance to azoles in Aspergillus fumigatus in a French cohort of patients treated for haematological malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:371–374. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bader O, Weig M, Reichard U, Lugert R, Kuhns M, Christner M, Held J, Peter S, Schumacher U, Buchheidt D, Tintelnot K. 2013. cyp51A-based mechanisms of Aspergillus fumigatus azole drug resistance present in clinical samples from Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3513–3517. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00167-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van Ingen J, van der Lee HAL, Rijs AJMM, Snelders E, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. 2015. High-level pan-azole-resistant aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 53:2343–2345. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00502-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fuhren J, Voskuil WS, Boel CH, Haas PJ, Hagen F, Meis JF, Kusters JG. 2015. High prevalence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from high-risk patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:2894–2898. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Randhawa HS, Gaur SN, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Isolation of multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:362–366. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Kathuria S, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2015. Prevalence and mechanism of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus in a referral chest hospital in Delhi, India and an update of the situation in Asia. Front Microbiol 6:428. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group. Clin Infect Dis 46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McClenny N. 2005. Laboratory detection and identification of Aspergillus species by microscopic observation and culture: the traditional approach. Med Mycol 43:S125–S128. doi: 10.1080/13693780500052222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clemons KV, Stevens DA. 2009. Conventional or molecular measurement of Aspergillus load. Med Mycol 47:S132–S137. doi: 10.1080/13693780802213340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. approved standard, 2nd ed CLSI document M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arendrup MC, Guinea J, Cuenca-Estrella M, Meletiadis J, Mouton JW, Lagrou K, Howard SJ, Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) . 2015. EUCAST definitive document E.Def 9.3. Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia forming moulds, version 9.3 European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Växjö, Sweden: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/AFST/Files/EUCAST_E_Def_9_3_Mould_testing_definitive.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Espinel-Ingroff A, Canton E, Fothergill A, Johnson EM, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Rinaldi MG, Turnidge JD. 2010. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the triazoles and six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). J Clin Microbiol 48:3251–3257. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00536-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Moet GJ, Jones RN. 2011. Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles for Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus: application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiologic cutoff values to characterize resistance in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2009). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 69:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2017. Antifungal agents—breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs, version 8.1. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/AFST/Clinical_breakpoints/Antifungal_breakpoints_v_8.1_March_2017.pdf.
- 24.Verweij PE, Snelders E, Kema GH, Mellado E, Melchers WJ. 2009. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-effect of environmental fungicide use? Lancet Infect Dis 9:789–795. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70265-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bueid A, Howard SJ, Moore CB, Richardson MD, Harrison E, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2010. Azole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: 2008 and 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2116–2118. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Steinmann J, Hamprecht A, Vehreschild MJGT, Cornely OA, Buchheidt D, Spiess B, Koldehoff M, Buer J, Meis JF, Rath PM. 2015. Emergence of azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis in HSCT recipients in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1522–1526. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Verweij PE, Mellado E, Melchers WJ. 2007. Multiple-triazole-resistant aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 356:1481–1483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc061720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lockhart SR, Frade JP, Etienne KA, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Balajee SA. 2011. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from the ARTEMIS global surveillance study is primarily due to the TR/L98H mutation in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4465–4468. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00185-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van der Linden JWM, Arendrup MC, Warris A, Lagrou K, Pelloux H, Hauser PM, Chryssanthou E, Mellado E, Kidd SE, Tortorano AM, Dannaoui E, Gaustad P, Baddley JW, Uekötter A, Lass-Flörl C, Klimko N, Moore CB, Denning DW, Pasqualotto AC, Kibbler C, Arikan-Akdagli S, Andes D, Meletiadis J, Naumiuk L, Nucci M, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. 2015. Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1041–1044. doi: 10.3201/eid2106.140717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alanio A, Denis B, Hamane S, Raffoux E, Peffault de Latour R, Menotti J, Amorim S, Touratier S, Bergeron A, Bretagne S. 2016. Azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus in immunocompromised patients with invasive aspergillosis. Emerg Infect Dis 22:157–158. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.150848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, Rice C, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ. 2008. In vitro survey of triazole cross-resistance among more than 700 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species. J Clin Microbiol 46:2568–2572. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00535-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Baddley JW, Marr KA, Andes DR, Walsh TJ, Kauffman CA, Kontoyiannis DP, Ito JI, Balajee SA, Pappas PG, Moser SA. 2009. Patterns of susceptibility of Aspergillus isolates recovered from patients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network. J Clin Microbiol 47:3271–3275. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00854-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shi JY, Xu YC, Shi Y, Lü HX, Liu Y, Zhao WS, Chen DM, Xi LY, Zhou X, Wang H, Guo LN. 2010. In vitro susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp. against voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:2706–2709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ahmad S, Joseph L, Hagen F, Meis JF, Khan Z. 2015. Concomitant occurrence of itraconazole-resistant and susceptible strains of Aspergillus fumigatus in routine cultures. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:412–415. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tashiro M, Izumikawa K, Hirano K, Ide S, Mihara T, Hosogaya N, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, Kurihara S, Imamura Y. 2012. Correlation between triazole treatment history and susceptibility in clinically isolated Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4870–4875. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00514-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, Sharma C, Sundar G, Singh PK, Gaur SN, Hagen F, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Clonal expansion and emergence of environmental multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR34/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. PLoS One 7:e52871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van der Linden JW, Snelders E, Kampinga GA et al. 2011. Clinical implications of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands, 2007–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1846–1854. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.110226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van der Linden JW, Camps SM, Kampinga GA et al. 2013. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. Clin Infect Dis 57:513–520. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Denning DW. 1996. Therapeutic outcome in invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 23:608–615. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.3.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pagano L, Girmenia C, Mele L, Ricci P, Tosti ME, Nosari A, Buelli M, Picardi M, Allione B, Corvatta L, D'Antonio D. 2001. Infections caused by filamentous fungi in patients with hematologic malignancies. A report of 391 cases by GIMEMA Infection Program. Haematologica 86:862–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tsiodras S, Samonis G, Boumpas DT, Kontoyiannis DP. 2008. Fungal infections complicating tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 83:181–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Corzo-Leon DE, Satlin MJ, Soave R, Shore TB, Schuetz AN, Jacobs SE, Walsh TJ. 2015. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the era of antifungal prophylaxis: a single-centre study with focus on emerging pathogens. Mycoses 58:325–336. doi: 10.1111/myc.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lortholary O, Gangneux JP, Sitbon K, Lebeau B, de Monbrison F, Le Strat Y, Coignard B, Dromer F, Bretagne S, French Mycosis Study Group . 2011. Epidemiological trends in invasive aspergillosis in France: the SAIF network (2005–2007). Clin Microbiol Infect 17:1882–1889. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boutboul F, Alberti C, Leblanc T, Sulahian A, Gluckman E, Derouin F, Ribaud P. 2002. Invasive aspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: increasing antigenemia is associated with progressive disease. Clin Infect Dis 34:939–943. doi: 10.1086/339324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nouér SA, Nucci M, Kumar NS, Grazziutti M, Barlogie B, Anaissie E. 2011. Earlier response assessment in invasive aspergillosis based on the kinetics of serum Aspergillus galactomannan: proposal for a new definition. Clin Infect Dis 53:671–676. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bergeron A, Porcher R, Menotti J, Poirot JL, Chagnon K, Vekhoff A, Cornet M, Isnard F, Raffoux E, Brethon B, Lacroix C. 2012. Prospective evaluation of clinical and biological markers to predict the outcome of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in hematological patients. J Clin Microbiol 50:823–830. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00750-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alanio A, Menotti J, Gits-Muselli M, Hamane S, Denis B, Rafoux E, Peffault de la Tour R, Touratier S, Bergeron A, Guigue N, Bretagne S. 2017. Circulating Aspergillus fumigatus DNA is quantitatively correlated to galactomannan in serum. Front Microbiol 8:2040. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghosh I, Raina V, Kumar L, Sharma A, Bakhshi S, Iqbal S. 2013. Serum galactomannan assay for diagnosis of probable invasive Aspergillosis in acute leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 34:74–79. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.116181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Muzamil J, Guru FR, Hakim A, Nabi F. 2016. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in oncological setting with use of newer vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor. Community Acquir Infect 3:16–23. doi: 10.4103/2225-6482.179232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Kathuria S, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2014. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with the environmental TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:555–571. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nawrot U, Kurzyk E, Arendrup MC, Mroczynska M, Wlodarczyk K, Sulik-Tyszka B, Wróblewska M, Ussowicz M, Zdziarski P, Niewinska K, Brillowska-Dabrowska A. 2018. Detection of Polish clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates resistant to triazoles. Med Mycol 56:121–124. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wiederhold NP, Gil VG, Gutierrez F, Lindner JR, Albataineh MT, McCarthy DI, Sanders C, Fan H, Fothergill AW, Sutton DA. 2016. First detection of TR34 L98H and TR46 Y121F T289A Cyp51 mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 54:168–171. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02478-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wu CJ, Wang HC, Lee JC, Lo HJ, Dai CT, Chou PH, Ko WC, Chen YC. 2015. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates carrying TR34/L98H mutations in Taiwan. Mycoses 58:544–549. doi: 10.1111/myc.12354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kidd SE, Goeman E, Meis JF, Slavin MA, Verweij PE. 2015. Multi-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infections in Australia. Mycoses 58:350–355. doi: 10.1111/myc.12324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Özmerdiven GE, Ak S, Ener B, Ağca H, Cilo BD, Tunca B, Akalın H. 2015. First determination of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR34/L98H mutations in Turkey. J Infect Chemother 21:581–586. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mortensen KL, Mellado E, Lass-Florl C, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Johansen HK, Arendrup MC. 2010. Environmental study of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and other aspergilli in Austria, Denmark, and Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4545–4549. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00692-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Le Pape P, Lavergne R-A, Morio F, Alvarez-Moreno C. 2016. Multiple fungicide-driven alterations in azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Colombia, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 22:156–157. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.150978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Monzon A, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2008. Epidemiological cutoffs and cross-resistance to azole drugs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2468–2472. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00156-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen J, Li H, Li R, Bu D, Wan Z. 2005. Mutations in the cyp51A gene and susceptibility to itraconazole in Aspergillus fumigatus serially isolated from a patient with lung aspergilloma. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:31–37. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, Meis JF. 2013. Emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains due to agricultural azole use creates an increasing threat to human health. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003633. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Camps SM, Dutilh BE, Arendrup MC, Rijs AJ, Snelders E, Huynen MA, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Discovery of a HapE mutation that causes azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus through whole genome sequencing and sexual crossing. PLoS One 7:e50034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Albarrag AM, Anderson MJ, Howard SJ, Robson GD, Warn PA, Sanglard D, Denning DW. 2011. Interrogation of related clinical pan-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains: G138C, Y431C, and G434C single nucleotide polymorphisms in cyp51A, upregulation of cyp51A, and integration and activation of transposon Atf1 in the cyp51A promoter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5113–5121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00517-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Verweij PE, Ananda-Rajah M, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Brüggemann RJ, Chowdhary A, Cornely OA, Denning DW, Groll AH, Izumikawa K, Kullberg BJ. 2015. International expert opinion on the management of infection caused by azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. Drug Resist Updat 21:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
