Abstract
Miniaturized ultrafast switchable optical components with an extremely compact size and a high-speed response will be the core of next-generation all-optical devices instead of traditional integrated circuits, which are approaching the bottleneck of Moore’s Law. Metasurfaces have emerged as fascinating subwavelength flat optical components and devices for light focusing and holography applications. However, these devices exhibit a severe limitation due to their natural passive response. Here we introduce an active hybrid metasurface integrated with patterned semiconductor inclusions for all-optical active control of terahertz waves. Ultrafast modulation of polarization states and the beam splitting ratio are experimentally demonstrated on a time scale of 667 ps. This scheme of hybrid metasurfaces could also be extended to the design of various free-space all-optical active devices, such as varifocal planar lenses, switchable vector beam generators, and components for holography in ultrafast imaging, display, and high-fidelity terahertz wireless communication systems.
Active metasurfaces: Terahertz control
All-optical control and manipulation of terahertz waves is now possible thanks to the development of custom-designed, dynamic reconfigurable metasurfaces. Realized by Longqing Cong and coworkers from Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and Tianjin University in China, the metasurfaces enable ultrafast (sub-nanosecond) polarization switching and beam splitting. They consist of an array of miniature aluminum-coated silicon split-ring resonators on a sapphire substrate. Illumination with short pulses of an infrared “pump beam” causes charge carriers in the silicon patch of the microring to transition from the valence to the conduction band, temporarily changing the photoconductivity and thus switching the transmission of the metasurface between “off” and “on” states for a polarized terahertz wave. Such high-speed switching of polarization is expected to be useful for applications such as data-encoding and multiplexing in a terahertz communications system as well as holography.
Introduction
The widely applied optical components are mostly developed from natural materials, utilizing their refractive or diffractive effects for applications in wave plates, lenses, gratings, and beam splitters. Although these components have exhibited excellent performance in display, imaging, and optical communication systems, their bulky size limits their integration into miniaturized and compact optical systems, and their passive responses fail to provide switchable features for more advanced optical applications. The rapid progress in metamaterial research has attracted much attention for developing functional metadevices with extraordinary properties enabled by the artificially designed building blocks1–3. However, the practical applications of these metadevices are still limited due to the complex fabrication techniques, material losses, and operation bandwidths. The emergence of planar metasurfaces has enabled promising applications for planar optical components and has opened up opportunities for unprecedented control of electromagnetic waves4–9. One of the most promising applications of metasurfaces that has been discovered recently is as coding metamaterials10–17. To date, most of the studies in manipulating light using metasurfaces focus on improving the operation efficiency18–20, solving aberrations21, 22, and broadening the bandwidth23–25. However, less attention has been devoted to investigating active routes for switchable or multifunctional metasurface devices whose configuration could be dynamically controlled using external stimuli26–29. Potential approaches have been reported for the dynamic modulation of metasurfaces30, such as by integrating varactor or PIN diodes31, 32, microelectromechanical system-based actuators33, 34, semiconductor materials (silicon, GaAs, and conducting oxide)27, 35–40, two-dimensional materials (graphene and perovskite)29, 41, 42, phase change materials (VO2 and GST)26, 28, 43, and nonlinear materials44, 45. All of these approaches have revealed excellent capabilities in modulating the responses of a metadevice via electrical, optical, or thermal stimuli, with their own respective merits and demerits. As an excellent and mature complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor-compatible material, silicon has manifested its special appeal in industrial devices for electronic integrated circuits, solar cells, and solid-state lasers. In particular, silicon-based hybrid metasurfaces have been demonstrated for the modulation of the Fano resonance46, electromagnetically induced transparency, and slow light behaviors35 due to the fabrication flexibility and excellent optical properties of silicon. However, there are very few reports of dynamic metadevices that could be used as multifunctional planar optical devices (see supplementary Table S1). In this work, we propose a scheme for a hybrid terahertz anisotropic resonator, which acts as a basic building block of a miniature all-optical active metasurface integrated with a patterned silicon epilayer. We experimentally demonstrate an ultrafast all-optical modulation of transmitted polarization states and dynamic beam splitting in a hybrid metal–silicon metamaterial resonator scheme.
Materials and methods
Hybrid circular split ring resonator (h-SRR)
A h-SRR on a square unit cell is adopted as a basic building block for the study of metasurface properties. In Fig. 1a, the green-color square is a sapphire (Al2O3) substrate, the purple part is a circular silicon (Si) ring on top of the sapphire, and the yellow-color split ring is made of aluminum on top of the silicon ring. The split gap in the metallic ring breaks the symmetry of the unit cell structure, which leads to different resonance behaviors for orthogonal polarization excitations, i.e., parallel (along the y axis) and perpendicular (along the x axis) to the mirror symmetric axis. As shown by the dashed lines in Fig. 1b, a typical inductive-capacitive (LC) resonance (mode I) and a third-order resonance (mode III) are induced by an x-polarized incidence, and a dipole resonance (mode II) is excited by a y-polarized incidence in the frequency range of interest. Relative to a linearly polarized incidence, an in-plane rotation of the resonator by 45° results in an excitation of all three fundamental resonance modes, which enables a broadened spectrum, as shown by the solid line in Fig. 1b. These three modes reveal discrete resonance behaviors and show different radiative properties that are observed via simulated surface currents and electric fields at the respective resonance frequencies. Figure 1b represents the resultant electric field concentration at the three resonance modes: a strong confinement is observed in the capacitive gap localized at modes I and III and a faint electric field is observed in the gap at mode II. Such a mode difference allows a distinct control of resonance behaviors and enables an active modulation of the anisotropy of the h-SRR by selectively damping modes I and III. Several promising active metadevices and ultrafast switches could be developed on the basis of the h-SRR.
All-optical active modulation
When a thin semiconductor epitaxial layer (Si, bandgap ~1.1 eV) was incorporated in the h-SRR, the optical properties were actively controlled by an external optical pump (pulsed laser @ 800 nm, 1 kHz repetition rate, ~120 fs pulse width, and beam spot diameter Ф ~ 10 mm), as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The pump beam has a higher photon energy than the bandgap of the patterned silicon in order to pump the carriers from the valence band to the conduction band, which produces dynamic photoconductivity. A detailed study of the photoconductivity at different pump fluences was performed using an optical pump terahertz probe (OPTP) setup with unpatterned silicon on sapphire (SOS) substrate (see supplementary Note S1). Frequency-resolved photoconductivity (, relative to the static conductivity without pump fluence) was obtained from , where ε0 is the free space permittivity; c is the speed of light in free space; d is the silicon epitaxial layer thickness (600 nm); na and nb are the refractive indices of the media on either side of the sample, i.e., air and sapphire; is the transmission signal of the sample in the absence of photoexcitation; and is the transmission difference () at different pump fluences (). The experimentally obtained data is plotted in supplementary Figure S1, which shows a slight dispersion in the frequency band of interest (0.4–1.0 THz), and thus we consider a fluence-dependent photoconductivity at 0.7 THz for simplicity, as shown in Fig. 2b. We observe an enhanced photoconductivity of the silicon thin film from the static state (~160 S/m)35 to 15,369 S/m at a pump fluence of 1.9 mJ/cm2 (see supplementary Note S2). To show the switching behavior of the anisotropy in the h-SRR, we define two states: “OFF” representing the state when the photoexcitation is absent and “ON” representing a high fluence (1.9 mJ/cm2) photoexcited state. The switching speed of the device is determined by the accumulation and relaxation time of the photocarriers in the epitaxial silicon layer on the sapphire substrate, as shown in Fig. 2c. The maximum excitation of photocarriers occurs at approximately 30 ps after the pump pulse is incident on the sample at t = 0 ps, and the relaxation (recombination) dynamics is described by a monoexponential decay equation . The decay constant is determined to be 667 ps, which is adopted as the switching time of the hybrid metasurface since the resonances switch off and on at this time scale. Faster relaxation dynamics of silicon could be achieved by introducing defects or implanting ions into the intrinsic silicon that show two orders of magnitude faster switching time (see supplementary Figure S2). Another possible solution is by introducing doped high-mobility plasmonic materials (In-doped CdO) into the hybrid configuration via intraband pumping, for which the relaxation was reported to be on the femtosecond time scale38. We note that the intrinsic photoconductivity and relaxation dynamics of SOS substrates are identical to those in the operation of hybrid metadevices (see supplementary Figure S3 and Note S3).
The active control of the anisotropy in the h-SRR (see Fig. 2d) was experimentally probed using the OPTP setup (see supplementary Note S1). As shown in Fig. 2e, all three fundamental resonance modes were simultaneously induced in the co-polarized (Txx or Tyy) transmission spectrum in the OFF state of the h-SRR with a 45° orientation of the gap relative to the linearly polarized incidence. As a result of the anisotropy, there is a large magnitude of the cross-polarized component (Txy or Tyx) in a broad frequency regime, as shown in Fig. 2f. Notably, the two diagonal elements in the Jones matrix are identical to each other, i.e., Txx = Tyy and Tyx = Txy (see supplementary Figure S4 and Note S4), since the symmetric axis of the planar h-SRR lies along the diagonal line (dashed line of zoomed-in image in Fig. 2d). As the optical pump is switched on with a fluence of 1.9 mJ/cm2, the photoconductivity in the patterned silicon epilayer increases, especially in the segment of the split gap region. The highly conductive silicon segments thus selectively damp resonance modes I and III due to the strong confinement of the electric field in the split gap. Therefore, the isotropy (symmetry) of the h-SRR is restored. Such a modulation behavior is captured in the co- and cross-polarized transmission spectra, as shown in Fig. 2e, f, where the disappearance of modes I and III is observed compared to the OFF state spectrum. An active evolution from a multimode broadband spectrum in the OFF state to a pure dipole resonance mode in the ON state is realized by the h-SRR metasurface. Meanwhile, the restored isotropy due to the shorting of the capacitive gap of the h-SRR unit cell in the ON state also reflects the largely reduced magnitude of the cross-polarized component (a relative 85% modulation at 0.72 THz).
Results and Discussion
Ultrafast active polarization switch
One of the most straightforward results in the active modulation of the anisotropy is the tailoring of the output polarization states. The measured output polarization states that were characterized by ellipticity (see supplementary Note S5) are plotted in Fig. 2g. We clearly observe the contrast between the output polarization ellipses in a broad operation band for the ON and OFF states. Such an ultrafast polarization switch is visualized in Fig. 2h with typical polarization ellipses captured at 0.84 THz, where the largest polarization contrast is observed. Notably, a large polarization change from right-handed circular polarization (RCP, OFF state) to quasi-linear polarization (LP, ON state) is obtained, which exhibits a better polarization contrast compared to the recently reported results38, 47. The output polarization state can also be continuously modulated at different pump fluences (see supplementary Figure S5). Moreover, a stable response was observed for an s-polarized incidence at an oblique angle as large as 30° (see supplementary Figure S6). Such an all-optical polarization switch can be re-activated on a sub-nanosecond time scale determined by the photocarrier dynamics of the silicon epilayer, which is highly promising for ultrafast and high-fidelity polarization-division data encoding and multiplexing in ultrafast optical and terahertz communication systems.
All-optical active beam splitter
A more interesting application on the basis of the h-SRR is an active metasurface for planar optical components, such as beam splitters48, 49, planar focal lens21, and holographic displays18. Since all of these applications are based on the two-dimensional logical phase distributions of the local resonators, we experimentally demonstrate an active beam splitter as a proof of concept using the all-optical active h-SRR resonator.
To obtain the full coverage of 360° phase response of the local radiation, we carefully tailor the geometrical parameters of the h-SRR by varying its radius (rn) and arc angle (αn) that form the active split gap, where the subscript n is the series number of a single resonator. First, we obtain the radiative phase values of the cross-polarized components evenly covering the 180° range2, 24 from unit cells #1 to #4, as shown in Fig. 3a. With the broadband cross-polarized components of the anisotropic resonator in the OFF state, the corresponding phase values (using the phase response of unit cell #1 as a reference) also reveal a broadband behavior that is visualized in Fig. 3b. Second, by employing the Pancharatnam–Berry phase50, the phase coverage from 180° to 360° in unit cells #5 to #8 is achieved by rotating unit cells #1 to #4 by 90°, which introduces an extra 180° geometric phase. Unit cells #1 to #8 form a supercell that provides the extra momentum for cross-polarized transmitted light so that the wavefront is deflected from the metasurface normal with an angle of θcrs-pol following the generalized Snell’s law equation: , where and dy are the phase difference and geometrical distance between the neighboring unit cells, respectively, and λ0 is the wavelength of light. In addition to the phase response, the radiation amplitude of each unit cell determines the overall quality of the deflected wavefront and efficiency. The respective cross-polarized transmission amplitude is plotted in Fig. 3c, where we obtain an approximately constant amplitude for all eight unit cells in a broadband regime with an overall amplitude of approximately 0.4. Consequently, we could realize a high-quality polarized plane wave in a broadband range that is dispersed toward different angles relative to the metasurface normal following the generalized Snell’s law (Fig. 3d).
Figure 4a shows the fabricated h-SRR supercell sample (see supplementary Note S1). Since the cross-polarized component deviates from the normal transmission of the co-polarized component (see supplementary Figure S7 and Note S6), the hybrid metasurface operates as a polarizing beam splitter in the static state, as illustrated in Fig. 4b. Angle-resolved measurements were performed using a set of fiber-based terahertz time-domain system (see supplementary Note S1) by sweeping the angle from −80° to +80° at an angular resolution of 1°. The experimental results are plotted in Fig. 4c. The normal direction is defined as 0°, where all the co-polarized transmission component is collected without dispersion and the cross-polarized component bends toward different positive angles depending on the frequencies such that dispersive polarizing beam splitting is realized in a broad terahertz band. The overall static transmission efficiencies for the co- and cross-polarized components are ~23% and ~15%, respectively, giving rise to a splitting ratio of ~60:40 for the normal and deflected beams. The measured dispersive components that are deflected at different angles obey the generalized Snell’s law equation (Fig. 4d), which also validates the measured results. The agreement between the experimental results and theoretical prediction is excellent except for the slight deviation observed at lower frequencies, which is mainly due to the large deflection angles and low signal intensity.
We further measured the active modulation of the beam splitting ratio using the OPTP and fiber-based terahertz time-domain spectroscopic systems. Fig. 5a, b show the measured transmission efficiency of the cross- and co-polarized components in the OFF state, respectively. Since the cross-polarized component is dispersed in the angular space, we plot the transmission efficiency spectra from +0° to +80° with an angular resolution of 1°, as shown by the colored area in Fig. 5a, which also provides a profile of the frequency-dependent intensity spectrum. An overall efficiency of 15% was obtained in a broad bandwidth range extending from 0.6 to 1.0 THz. Such a broadband cross-polarized efficiency originates from the intrinsic anisotropy of the h-SRRs, which also enables a broadband multi-mode co-polarized spectrum with the three fundamental modes simultaneously excited for each h-SRR unit cell. The co-polarized transmission component is nondispersive in angular space, which allows for the direct measurement of the intensity, as shown in Fig. 5b, where a broadband multi-mode spectrum is observed. The respective simulation results are also shown to verify the measurements. The numerically calculated data agreed well with the measurements except for the slight divergence at very low and high frequencies, which was due to the limitations of our experimental systems (see supplementary Note S7).
In the ON state with an external pump for ultrafast modulation of the beam splitting ratio, the transmission efficiencies were measured in the OPTP system, where a coherent amplified pump beam was introduced for ultrafast optical control. Owing to the stationary transmitter and receiver in the free-space OPTP terahertz spectroscopic system, the modulation of the angle-resolved cross-polarized efficiency could not be directly measured. However, the modulation was readily observed in simulations by adopting the experimental photoconductivity values of a silicon epilayer (σ = 15,369 S/m at a 1.9 mJ/cm2 pump fluence). As shown in Fig. 5c, the relative intensity modulation of ~73% is observed for the deflected cross-polarized component. Moreover, we experimentally monitored the ultrafast modulation of the nondispersive co-polarized transmission spectrum transforming from a multimode scenario (Fig. 5b, OFF state) to a pure dipole mode (Fig. 5d, ON state) for a normal transmission. The corresponding simulation results for the ON state reveal a pure dipole mode spectrum that agrees well with the experimental data. These results also validate the rationality of the cross-polarized spectrum modulation due to the correlated nature between the co- and cross-polarized components.
Such an ultrafast correlated modulation of the co- and cross-polarized components could enable an all-optical active polarizing beam splitter with an adjustable ratio, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4b. The beam splitting ratio is defined as the ratio between the co- (normal) and cross-polarized (deflected) transmission intensities, which reveals a broadband feature, as shown in Fig. 5e, and the ratio is switched from 60:40 to 80:20 for the OFF and ON states, respectively. In fact, the splitting ratio can be continuously modulated within the OFF and ON states by adjusting the pump fluences (see supplementary Figure S8). Note that the total operating efficiency is limited to 40% (Fig. 5f) due to the intrinsic theoretical limitation of single layer metasurfaces50 and the high dissipation in metals. However, several feasible approaches can be applied to improve the efficiency, such as introducing multilayer metasurfaces51, operating in reflection mode in a sandwich-type configuration23 (see supplementary Figure S9) or replacing the metal constituents with dielectric counterparts52. Such a beam splitter is ultrathin and miniature with an ultrafast tunable splitting ratio, which could find potential applications in photonic circuits and integrated optical chips for micro-photonic systems.
Conclusions
In summary, we demonstrated optical switching of the anisotropy of a hybrid metamaterial resonator on a time scale of ~667 ps. This resulted in an ultrafast switching of polarization states with a large polarization contrast. An active polarizing beam splitter with an adjustable beam splitting ratio was also experimentally demonstrated, which is enabled by the tunable dynamic photoconductivity of silicon in the hybrid resonator design. In addition to the discussed prototypes, the applications of our metadevice can be easily extended to designing different metasurface-based active planar optical components, such as ultrafast varifocal planar lenses for photosensitive auto-focus cameras and real-time holographic displays. With the excellent scalability of metamaterials, such a hybrid configuration could be implemented in a broadband spectral regime from the microwave to visible domains. The presented miniaturized ultrathin hybrid metadevices could provide solutions to integrated optical systems with ultrafast data encoding and polarization-division multiplexing for terahertz wireless communications.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the funding support of this research from the Singapore Ministry of Education Grant No. MOE2015-T2-2-103 and MOE2016-T3-1-006(S)
Authors contributions
L.C. and R. S. conceived the idea. L.C. designed the experiment, and performed active measurements and all the simulations. Y.K.S. fabricated the samples. H.Z. performed the angle-resolved measurements. L.C. and R.S. discussed and analyzed the measured data. R.S., J.H and X.Z. supervised the theory and the measurements. L.C. and R.S. prepared the manuscript with inputs from J.H and X.Z.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Article accepted preview
Accepted article preview online: 26 April 2018
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41377-018-0024-y.
References
- 1.Smith DR, Pendry JB, Wiltshire MCK. Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science. 2004;305:788–792. doi: 10.1126/science.1096796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu NF, et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science. 2011;334:333–337. doi: 10.1126/science.1210713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zheludev NI, Kivshar YS. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:917–924. doi: 10.1038/nmat3431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sun SL, et al. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:426–431. doi: 10.1038/nmat3292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arbabi A, Arbabi E, Horie Y, Kamali SM, Faraon A. Planar metasurface retroreflector. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:415–420. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.96. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arbabi A, Horie Y, Bagheri M, Faraon A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015;10:937–943. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sartorello G, et al. Ultrafast optical modulation of second- and third-harmonic generation from cut-disk-based metasurfaces. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:1517–1522. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kundtz N, Smith DR. Extreme-angle broadband metamaterial lens. Nat. Mater. 2009;9:129–132. doi: 10.1038/nmat2610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu HX, Wang GM, Ma K, Cui TJ. Superscatterer illusions without using complementary media. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2014;2:572–580. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li LL, et al. Electromagnetic reprogrammable coding-metasurface holograms. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:197. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00164-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang HH, et al. A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:35692. doi: 10.1038/srep35692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huang C, et al. Dynamical beam manipulation based on 2-bit digitally-controlled coding metasurface. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42302. doi: 10.1038/srep42302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J, Cheng Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 2014;3:e218. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2014.99. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu S, et al. Anisotropic coding metamaterials and their powerful manipulation of differently polarized terahertz waves. Light Sci. Appl. 2016;5:e16076. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu S, et al. Convolution operations on coding metasurface to reach flexible and continuous controls of terahertz beams. Adv. Sci. 2016;3:1600156. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu S, Cui TJ. Concepts, working principles, and applications of coding and programmable metamaterials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017;5:1700624. doi: 10.1002/adom.201700624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang L, Liu S, Li LL, Cui TJ. Spin-controlled multiple pencil beams and vortex beams with different polarizations generated by pancharatnam-berry coding metasurfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:36447–36455. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b12468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zheng GX, et al. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015;10:308–312. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun SL, et al. High-efficiency broadband anomalous reflection by gradient meta-surfaces. Nano Lett. 2012;12:6223–6229. doi: 10.1021/nl3032668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Headland D, et al. Dielectric resonator reflectarray as high-efficiency nonuniform terahertz metasurface. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:1019–1026. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang SM, et al. Broadband achromatic optical metasurface devices. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:187. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00166-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aieta F, Kats MA, Genevet P, Capasso F. Multiwavelength achromatic metasurfaces by dispersive phase compensation. Science. 2015;347:1342–1345. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang YM, et al. Dielectric meta-reflectarray for broadband linear polarization conversion and optical vortex generation. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1394–1399. doi: 10.1021/nl4044482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang XQ, et al. Broadband terahertz wave deflection based on C-shape complex metamaterials with phase discontinuities. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:4567–4572. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang Q, et al. Broadband metasurface holograms: toward complete phase and amplitude engineering. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:32867. doi: 10.1038/srep32867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chu CH, et al. Active dielectric metasurface based on phase-change medium. Laser Photon Rev. 2016;10:986–994. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201600106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang YW, et al. Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2016;16:5319–5325. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Q, et al. Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials. Nat. Photonics. 2016;10:60–65. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miao ZQ, et al. Widely tunable terahertz phase modulation with gate-controlled graphene metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. X. 2015;5:041027. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sautter J, et al. Active tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Nano. 2015;9:4308–4315. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu HX, et al. Dynamical control on helicity of electromagnetic waves by tunable metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27503. doi: 10.1038/srep27503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu HX, et al. Tunable microwave metasurfaces for high-performance operations: dispersion compensation and dynamical switch. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38255. doi: 10.1038/srep38255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cong LQ, et al. Active multifunctional microelectromechanical system metadevices: applications in polarization control, wavefront deflection, and holograms. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017;5:1600716. doi: 10.1002/adom.201600716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tao H, et al. Reconfigurable terahertz metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:147401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.147401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gu JQ, et al. Active control of electromagnetically induced transparency analogue in terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1151. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Su XQ, et al. Active metasurface terahertz deflector with phase discontinuities. Opt. Express. 2015;23:27152–27158. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.027152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang S, et al. Photoinduced handedness switching in terahertz chiral metamolecules. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:942. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang YM, et al. Femtosecond optical polarization switching using a cadmium oxide-based perfect absorber. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:390–395. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.64. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Iyer PP, Butakov NA, Schuller JA. Reconfigurable semiconductor phased-array metasurfaces. ACS Photonics. 2015;2:1077–1084. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Drevinskas R, Beresna M, Zhang JY, Kazanskii AG, Kazansky PG. Ultrafast laser-induced metasurfaces for geometric phase manipulation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017;5:1600575. doi: 10.1002/adom.201600575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cong LQ, Srivastava YK, Solanki A, Sum TC, Singh R. Perovskite as a platform for active flexible metaphotonic devices. ACS Photonics. 2017;4:1595–1601. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yan RS, Arezoomandan S, Sensale-Rodriguez B, Xing HG. Exceptional terahertz wave modulation in graphene enhanced by frequency selective surfaces. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:315–323. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00639. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lei DY, et al. Optically-triggered nanoscale memory effect in a hybrid plasmonic-phase changing nanostructure. ACS Photonics. 2015;2:1306–1313. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ren MX, et al. Nanostructured plasmonic medium for terahertz bandwidth all-optical switching. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:5540–5544. doi: 10.1002/adma.201103162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ren MX, Plum E, Xu JJ, Zheludev NI. Giant nonlinear optical activity in a plasmonic metamaterial. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:833. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Manjappa M, Srivastava YK, Cong LQ, Al-Naib I, Singh R. Active photoswitching of sharp fano resonances in THz metadevices. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1603355. doi: 10.1002/adma.201603355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nicholls LH, et al. Ultrafast synthesis and switching of light polarization in nonlinear anisotropic metamaterials. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:628–633. doi: 10.1038/s41566-017-0002-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Niu TM, et al. Terahertz reflectarray as a polarizing beam splitter. Opt. Express. 2014;22:16148–16160. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.016148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Khorasaninejad M, Zhu W, Crozier KB. Efficient polarization beam splitter pixels based on a dielectric metasurface. Optica. 2015;2:376–382. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ding XM, et al. Ultrathin pancharatnam–berry metasurface with maximal cross-polarization efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:1195–1200. doi: 10.1002/adma.201405047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cong LQ, et al. A perfect metamaterial polarization rotator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:171107. doi: 10.1063/1.4826536. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kruk S, et al. Invited article: broadband highly efficient dielectric metadevices for polarization control. APL Photonics. 2016;1:030801. doi: 10.1063/1.4949007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.