Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0198055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198055

Construction and analysis of mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and TF regulatory networks reveal the key genes associated with prostate cancer

Yun Ye 1,*,#, Su-Liang Li 1,#, Sheng-Yu Wang 2
Editor: Geraldo A Passos3
PMCID: PMC6107126  PMID: 30138363

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate cancer (PCa) causes a common male urinary system malignant tumour, and the molecular mechanisms of PCa are related to the abnormal regulation of various signalling pathways. An increasing number of studies have suggested that mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and TFs could play important roles in various biological processes that are associated with cancer pathogenesis. This study aims to reveal functional genes and investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms of PCa with bioinformatics.

Methods

Original gene expression profiles were obtained from the GSE64318 and GSE46602 datasets in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We conducted differential screens of the expression of genes (DEGs) between two groups using the online tool GEO2R based on the R software limma package. Interactions between differentially expressed miRNAs, mRNAs and lncRNAs were predicted and merged with the target genes. Co-expression of miRNAs, lncRNAs and mRNAs was selected to construct mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA interaction networks. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed for the DEGs. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed, and transcription factors were annotated. Expression of hub genes in the TCGA datasets was verified to improve the reliability of our analysis.

Results

The results demonstrate that 60 miRNAs, 1578 mRNAs and 61 lncRNAs were differentially expressed in PCa. The mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA networks were composed of 5 miRNA nodes, 13 lncRNA nodes, and 45 mRNA nodes. The DEGs were mainly enriched in the nuclei and cytoplasm and were involved in the regulation of transcription, related to sequence-specific DNA binding, and participated in the regulation of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway. These pathways are related to cancer and focal adhesion signalling pathways. Furthermore, we found that 5 miRNAs, 6 lncRNAs, 6 mRNAs and 2 TFs play important regulatory roles in the interaction network. The expression levels of EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT were significantly different between PCa and normal prostate tissue.

Conclusion

Based on the current study, large-scale effects of interrelated mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and TFs established a new prostate cancer network. In addition, we conducted functional module analysis within the network. In conclusion, this study provides new insight for exploration of the molecular mechanisms of PCa and valuable clues for further research into the process of tumourigenesis and its development in PCa.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) involves a common male urinary system malignant tumour that has the highest incidence among European and American populations [1,2]. This disease not only seriously affects the quality of life of patients but is also associated with financial burdens for society and the family [3,4]. PCa is closely regulated by various cytokines, related genes and intercellular signalling networks in the course of its development. However, the specific molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, it is important to study the molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer and to prevent the disease and develop effective treatments.

miRNAs are a class of non-coding small RNAs that can be combined with the 3-'UTR of target mRNA to regulate gene expression, which leads to abnormal expression of target genes. A large number of studies have reported abnormal expression of miRNAs in prostate cancer involving multiple miRNAs, such as miR-16, 221, 375, 1290 and 141 [5–7]. Abnormal miRNA expression has been confirmed to be closely related with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and transcription factors (TFs). lncRNAs regulate miRNA expression by binding and sequestering target miRNAs and participating in mRNA expression regulation [8,9]. lncRNAs are emerging as novel diagnostic markers of PCa, and Chang et al. found that HOTAIR may participate in PCa progression[10]. Tian et al. revealed that RNCR3 functions as a tumour-promoting lncRNA in prostate cancer[11]. Li et al. found long noncoding RNA BDNF-AS is associated with clinical outcomes and plays a functional role in human prostate cancer[12]. As important factors in gene transcription and post-transcriptional regulation, TFs are also involved in controlling signaling pathways with miRNAs [13,14]. A previous study found that CREB1 and FoxA1 associated with advanced prostate cancer, and CREB1/FoxA1 target gene panels can predict prostate cancer recurrence[15]. However, further research is needed to determine the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs, lncRNAs, TFs and mRNAs in PCa.

Microarray analysis can quickly identify all genes that are expressed at the same time-point [16]. Future research could benefit from integration and analysis of these data [17]. In this work, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in prostate cancer from the GSE64318 [18] and GSE46602 [19] datasets. We performed Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis for significant DEGs. Furthermore, we analysed mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to reveal interactions and identified some factors that may be associated with PCa regulatory mechanisms. Finally, we analysed hub genes based on the PPI network and TCGA datasets. This study will contribute to understanding the molecular mechanism of prostate cancer, providing valuable clues for further research.

Material and methods

Raw data

The datasets used in the present study were downloaded from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) [20]. The experimental articles that were used to compare the RNAs in prostate cancer tissue and noncancerous prostate tissue from patients were included. The original gene expression profiles were obtained from the GSE64318 [18] and GSE46602 datasets [19] (S1 and S2 Tables). The GSE64318 dataset includes microRNA expression profiles of prostate biopsy samples from 54 prostate biopsy specimens (27 tumours and 27 normal tissues). The platform used for these data is the GPL8227 Agilent-019118 Human miRNA Microarray 2.0 G4470B (miRNA ID version). The GSE46602 dataset includes genome expression profiling of tumour tissue specimens from 36 patients with prostate cancer and normal prostate biopsies from 14 patients. The platform used to analyse these data was the GPL570 Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array.

Identification of differentially expressed genes

GEO2R (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/) is an interactive web tool based on the R language limma package [21] that can be used to compare two or more groups of samples to identify differential expression in a GEO series. In the present study, GEO2R was used to filter differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs between normal and tumour samples separately in each of the datasets. The false discovery rate (FDR) is a method of conceptualizing the rate of type I errors in null hypothesis testing when conducting multiple comparisons. GEO2R calculates the FDR automatically. The multiple t test was used to detect statistically significant genes at the same time with FDR correction. Fold change (FC) >2 and P-value <0.05 were set as the cut-off criteria. Probes without a corresponding gene symbol were then filtered.

Prediction of mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA interactions

Interactions between differentially expressed miRNAs and differentially expressed mRNAs were predicted using miRWalk 3.0 (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/), which integrated the prediction results of both TargetScan [22] and miRDB [23], and a score ≥0.95 was considered as the cutoff criterion for the prediction analysis in miRWalk. Only the target mRNAs included in all of these databases were selected for the further analysis. The interaction between miRNA and lncRNA was predicted by using DIANA-LncBase v2.0 [24] and the score ≥0.4 was considered as cutoff criterion for the prediction analysis in the experimental module of LncBase. After the predicted targets were intersected with DEGs, miRNAs, lncRNAs and mRNAs were selected for further analysis. Cytoscape software (version 3.40) was used to visualize the regulatory network.

Gene function analysis

The DAVID database (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) was used to conduct gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis on significant DEGs and target genes of miRNAs with differential expression. The species was limited to Homo sapiens, and the “adjusted P-value (from the Benjamini–Hochberg method), 0.05” was considered statistically significant [25]. The GO terms included these three criteria: molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC), and biological process (BP).

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction and analysis

The protein-protein interaction network was constructed using the STRING online database. PPI pairs with a combined score ≥0.4 were used to construct the PPI network. Transcription factors were annotated using a TF checkpoint [26]. Then, the regulatory relationship between genes was visualized using Cytoscape software (version 3.4.0) and analysed through a topological property of the computing network including the degree distribution of the network using the CentiScaPe app [27]. Furthermore, the gene with a degree >5 was defined as a hub gene in the regulatory network according to a previous study [28].

TCGA dataset analysis

TCGA is a platform for researchers to download and assess free public datasets (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) [29]. In the present study, we verified the expression of hub genes in TCGA datasets to improve the reliability of our analysis using an online tool, UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) [30]. UALCAN used TCGA level 3 RNA-seq and clinical data from 31 cancer types. As described by Li and Dewey [31], the “scaled_estimate” was multiplied by 106 to obtain transcripts per million (TPM) expression value using an in-house PERL (Practical Extraction and Report Language) program. As TPM has been suggested to be more comparable across samples than fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) and reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM) [32], TPM was used as the measure of expression here. Fifty-two normal samples and 497 primary tumour samples of prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) in TCGA datasets were included in the present study. Box and whisker plots were used to show hub gene expression levels between normal samples and primary tumour samples in PRAD.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs

The results show that 60 miRNAs, 1578 mRNAs and 128 lncRNAs were differentially expressed in prostate cancer (S3, S4 and S5 Tables). Analysis of the GSE64318 dataset led to the identification of 60 miRNAs in PCa tumour tissues compared with normal prostate tissues, including 35 up-regulated miRNAs and 25 down-regulated miRNAs. Analysis of the GSE46602 dataset led to the identification of 1578 mRNAs, including 583 up-regulated and 995 down-regulated mRNAs, and 128 lncRNAs, including 49 up-regulated and 79 down-regulated lncRNAs. We selected all significantly up-regulated and down-regulated mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs to plot their expression on heat-maps and volcano plots (Fig 1). The top 10 significantly up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs, mRNAs and lncRNAs are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Fig 1. Differentially expressed genes in prostate cancer (PCa) and normal prostate tissue.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A. Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs. B. Heatmap of differentially expressed miRNAs. C. Volcano plot of differentially expressed mRNAs. D. Heatmap of differentially expressed mRNAs. E. Heatmap of differentially expressed lncRNAs).

Table 1. Top 10 significantly up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs in the GSE64318 dataset.

miRNA_ID Down/Up logFC adj.P.Val P.Value
hsa-miR-671-5p Down -1.58 0.003129 6.91E-05
hsa-miR-923 Down -1.5 0.01131 5.23E-04
hsa-miR-483-5p Down -1.47 0.027441 2.04E-03
hsa-miR-92b Down -1.42 0.004019 1.08E-04
hsa-miR-150 Down -1.35 0.002095 2.81E-05
hsa-miR-498 Down -1.31 0.007999 2.63E-04
hsa-miR-933 Down -1.3 0.000927 6.46E-06
hsa-miR-765 Down -1.3 0.001072 9.14E-06
hsa-miR-563 Down -1.24 0.006355 1.94E-04
hsa-miR-665 Down -1.21 0.003129 6.32E-05
hsa-miR-221 Up 1.46 0.009099 3.21E-04
hsa-miR-454 Up 1.46 0.029644 2.31E-03
hsa-miR-26b Up 1.47 0.034161 3.16E-03
hsa-let-7a Up 1.5 0.034161 3.02E-03
hsa-miR-203 Up 1.51 0.003856 9.86E-05
hsa-miR-148a Up 1.62 0.004387 1.23E-04
hsa-miR-183 Up 1.63 0.009145 3.34E-04
hsa-miR-200a Up 1.72 0.01323 7.09E-04
hsa-miR-1 Up 1.92 0.034161 3.02E-03
hsa-let-7f Up 2.01 0.024917 1.79E-03
Open in a new tab

Table 2. Top 10 significantly up-regulated and down-regulated mRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

Gene Symbol Down/Up logFC adj.P.Val P.Value
CD177 Down -6.06431 2.03E-09 1.89E-12
NEFH Down -5.84333 3.13E-05 3.34E-07
SLC14A1 Down -5.45679 8.83E-10 7.15E-13
KRT5 Down -5.10424 2.09E-10 1.03E-13
KRT15 Down -4.99578 1.56E-10 7.00E-14
TRIM29 Down -4.96486 2.68E-11 7.36E-15
TP63 Down -4.90695 7.76E-11 2.98E-14
JUP Down -4.73608 1.03E-09 9.03E-13
NEFH Down -4.57684 5.07E-05 6.18E-07
DST Down -4.55381 4.33E-08 7.60E-11
CXCL14 Up 3.356898 2.96E-03 1.22E-04
SIM2 Up 3.518509 2.60E-08 3.80E-11
F5 Up 3.592734 1.63E-03 5.63E-05
LUZP2 Up 3.789194 8.41E-05 1.21E-06
PCA3 Up 3.822882 1.28E-04 2.08E-06
AMACR Up 3.830373 7.49E-07 2.88E-09
GLYATL1 Up 3.928912 8.57E-07 3.45E-09
AMACR Up 4.307398 3.25E-07 1.02E-09
DLX1 Up 4.410439 5.09E-06 3.35E-08
PCA3 Up 4.558841 7.89E-06 5.87E-08
Open in a new tab

Table 3. Top 10 significantly up-regulated and down-regulated lncRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

Gene Symbol Location adj.P.Val P.Value logFC Down/Up
LINC00844 chr10:58999518–59001617 5.83E-09 6.18E-12 -4.45143 Down
MIR205HG chr1:209428820–209432552 4.37E-13 5.59E-17 -3.34821 Down
RP11-44F21.5 chr4:75081702–75084717 2.14E-07 6.06E-10 -3.01543 Down
RP11-680G24.5 chr16:15018106–15020488 1.49E-05 1.28E-07 -2.57293 Down
RP11-203B7.2 chr4:146052604–146056762 2.96E-07 9.10E-10 -2.25844 Down
MAGI2-AS3 chr7:79452957–79471208 1.29E-07 3.08E-10 -1.94617 Down
LSAMP-AS1 chr3:116360024–116370085 4.05E-06 2.48E-08 -1.94409 Down
LINC00937 chr12:8356963–8390752 1.63E-04 2.83E-06 -1.93046 Down
LINC00883 chr3:107240692–107326964 3.22E-04 6.79E-06 -1.86947 Down
PGM5-AS1 chr9:68355164–68357866 4.00E-02 4.20E-03 -1.86179 Down
RP5-1092A3.4 chr1:28239509–28241453 1.16E-01 2.21E-02 1.132616 Up
LINC01023 chr5:108727825–108728261 9.06E-04 2.61E-05 1.13526 Up
LINC01128 chr1:827591–859446 4.49E-02 5.00E-03 1.199525 Up
BAIAP2-AS1 chr17:81029133–81034719 1.48E-03 4.96E-05 1.201015 Up
RP11-48B3.4 chr8:80541300–80543104 1.15E-02 7.49E-04 1.284279 Up
RP11-339B21.15 chr9:128305161–128305515 6.32E-05 8.40E-07 1.310892 Up
GABPB1-AS1 chr15:50354174–50358312 8.11E-04 2.26E-05 1.367447 Up
RP11-391M1.4 chr3:40466466–40468587 7.89E-06 5.87E-08 1.489649 Up
RP11-295G20.2 chr1:231522517–231528556 7.32E-04 1.96E-05 1.673082 Up
LINC00992 chr5:117415512–117579744 1.90E-04 3.44E-06 2.288701 Up
Open in a new tab

mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network analysis

The miRNA–mRNA regulatory network was constructed. Interaction analysis shows that 33 differentially expressed miRNAs targeted 143 mRNAs, up-regulating or down-regulating them (Fig 2). In detail, 25 over-expressed miRNAs down-regulate 104 mRNAs, while 8 under-expressed miRNAs up-regulate 15 mRNAs. Subsequently, we reconstructed the lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA network after selecting the pre-treated data with P-values <0.05 and fold change >2 (Fig 3). In the network, there are 5 miRNA nodes, 13 lncRNA nodes, and 45 mRNA nodes. In detail, 9 under-expressed lncRNAs up-regulate 19 miRNAs, while 5 over-expressed miRNAs down-regulate 44 mRNAs.

Fig 2. miRNA–mRNA regulatory network.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Every node represents one gene, and each edge represents the interaction between genes. miRNAs are indicated with a V-shape, and mRNAs are indicated with circles. The colour red represents high expression, and blue represents low expression. There were 33 miRNAs, 143 mRNAs and 179 edges in the network.

Fig 3. mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA regulatory network.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

Every node represents one gene, and each edge represents the interaction between genes. mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs are indicated with circles, V-shapes and diamond shapes, respectively. The colour red represents high expression, and blue represents low expression. There were 13 lncRNAs, 5 miRNAs, 45 mRNAs and 81 edges in the network.

Function enrichment analysis of DEGs

GO enrichment analyses for DEGs based on the mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network were performed. The top 10 most significant GO terms of each group were shown. On the MF level, the DEGs were mainly enriched in sequence-specific DNA binding. On the CC level, the DEGs were mainly enriched in the nucleus, cytoplasm and plasma membrane. On the BP level, the DEGs were mainly enriched in positive regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter, cell proliferation and cell migration. The top 20 most significant KEGG pathway terms are shown. The genes were mainly enriched in the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, pathways in cancer and the focal adhesion signalling pathway (Fig 4, S1 File).

Fig 4. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) enrichment analysis.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

(A. The top 20 most significant KEGG pathway terms. B. The top 10 most significant changes in the GO biological process. C. The top 10 most significant changes in the GO cellular component. D. The top 10 most significant changes in the GO molecular function.).

Protein-protein interaction network (PPI) analysis

Using the STRING online database and Cytoscape software, a total of 128 of the 1578 DEGs were mapped into the PPI network complex. In this network, with a degree >5, 32 nodes were chosen as hub nodes, including 2 TFs, 14 miRNAs, and 16 mRNAs; the results are presented in Table 4, Fig 5 and S2 File. Moreover, we found that 6 mRNAs (i.e., EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT) exhibited higher degrees (>10) and miRNA-mRNA pairs. These findings suggest that these nodes may play important roles in the development of PCa.

Table 4. Topology parameters of hub genes (degree >5) in the miRNA-mRNA-TF regulatory network.

Gene Closeness Betweenness Degree
EGFR 0.00212766 4046.701286 22
VEGFA 0.002159827 4331.82023 20
hsa-miR-20b 0.001855288 2752.2272 16
hsa-miR-20a 0.001821494 2973.867274 16
hsa-let-7b 0.001481481 2436.558748 16
hsa-let-7a 0.001582278 1383.644882 14
hsa-let-7d 0.00174216 2553.049636 13
PIK3R1 0.002057613 2045.442867 12
DLG4 0.001869159 3167.065846 12
TGFBR1 0.001976285 3691.770395 11
KIT 0.001904762 1517.550434 11
hsa-miR-23b 0.001587302 1375.820161 10
PTEN 0.001923077 1345.754047 10
hsa-miR-301a 0.001610306 1995.023424 9
LDLR 0.001960784 1888.001784 9
FLT1 0.001930502 1179.255452 9
hsa-miR-200b 0.001445087 1353.57487 8
hsa-miR-148a 0.00140647 1235.527073 8
PPARGC1A 0.001801802 1571.190602 8
BCL2L11 0.001834862 1606.829419 8
NR3C1* 0.00177305 733.3472529 7
NRG1* 0.001872659 1359.250724 7
hsa-miR-98 0.001618123 802.5761652 7
hsa-miR-92b 0.001506024 1655.33632 7
GJA1 0.001745201 1149.048086 7
hsa-miR-96 0.001335113 1416.966025 6
hsa-miR-454 0.001420455 1854.243032 6
hsa-miR-145 0.001461988 1257.608267 6
TFRC 0.001821494 445.8511305 6
ITGB8 0.001808318 2026.300029 6
EPHA5 0.001689189 845.4402231 6
CAMK2D 0.001620746 1045.62274 6
Open in a new tab

* transcription factors (TFs).

Fig 5. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

mRNAs and miRNAs are indicated with circles sand arrows, respectively. TFs are indicated with black-traced circles. The green dotted line indicates the interaction of the miRNAs-mRNAs. The orange line indicates the relationship of the interaction of the proteins. The colour red represents high expression, and green represents low expression.

TCGA dataset analysis

TCGA dataset analyses were performed to demonstrate that aberrant expression of the hub genes, including EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT, were significantly different between PCa and normal prostate tissues (Fig 6).

Fig 6. TCGA dataset analysis.

Fig 6

Open in a new tab

(A. DLG4 expression in PCa. B. EGFR expression in PCa. C. KIT expression in PCa. D. PIK3R1 expression in PCa. E. VEGFA expression in PCa. F. TGFBR1 expression in PCa).

Discussion

Prostate cancer (PCa) has become a public health issue of great concern worldwide [33]. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in PCa progression are still unclear. Therefore, it is crucial to study the mechanism and identify molecular targets for diagnosis and treatment. A number of studies have found that the development of PCa is related to a variety of signalling pathways, and mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs and TFs play important regulatory roles. In this study, we performed a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and retrieved mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs and TFs in the interaction network, revealing key genes associated with prostate cancer.

miRNA expression in tumour tissues often differs from that of normal tissue, and this differential expression affects the occurrence, development and prognosis of tumours [34,35]. Studies have confirmed that miRNA expression profiles can be used as biomarkers for the early detection, classification and prognosis of tumours [36,37]. lncRNAs act as miRNA sponges and can regulate miRNA abundance and compete with mRNA for miRNA binding [38]. By constructing an mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network, we found that the aberrant expression of lncRNAs led to abnormal expression of 5 miRNAs (i.e., has-miR-20a, has-miR-20b, has-miR-23b, has-let-7a and has-let-7d) in PCa and thus regulated the expression of target mRNAs. A previous study demonstrated that 5 miRNAs regulate the development of prostate cancer by targeting specific mRNAs and play an important role in the regulation of prostate cancer [39–41]. The involvement of key lncRNAs including HYMAI, MEG3, IPO5P1, MAG12-AS3, RMST and TRG-AS1 are important. Among them, MEG3 is an important tumour suppressor gene that inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in PCa [42]. The discovery of these lncRNAs suggests potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for PCa.

Next, we conducted a functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs based on the mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network. We found that the DEGs were mainly enriched in the nucleus and cytoplasm, were involved in transcriptional regulation, were related to sequence-specific DNA binding and participated in regulation of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, which is related to cancer, and the focal adhesion signalling pathway. To further analyse the key genes related to PCa, we constructed a PPI network. More significantly, we found that the transcription factor NR3C1 was a hub gene that participates in regulation of the expression of multiple miRNAs (has-miR-20a, has-miR-20b, has-miR-23b). Puhr M et al. assessed NR3C1 expression and the functional significance in tissues from PCa and found that it is a key factor for the development of PCa [43]. Moreover, we found that its regulatory function is similar to MEG3 and its down-regulation leads to increased expression of miRNAs (has-miR-20a, has-miR-20b, and has-miR-23b). Based on these results, we speculate that some regulatory relationship may exist between NR3C1 and MEG3.

Finally, through PPI and TCGA dataset analyses, we found that 6 mRNAs (i.e., EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT) had higher degrees and miRNA-mRNA pairs. This expression was lower and significantly different between PCa and normal prostate tissues. EGFR belongs to a family of cell membrane receptor tyrosine kinases and is a key factor in tumour cell growth and invasion [44,45]. Previous studies have demonstrated that abnormal expression of EGFR and its downstream signalling contributes to disease progression in PCa [46]. EGFR downregulation is associated with enhanced signalling [47], which can lead to the development of cancer [48]. VEGFA is a mitogen with high endothelial cell specificity that plays a major regulatory role in the development of PCa [49]. A previous study found that PIK3R1, TGFBR1 and KIT might have clinical utility in distinguishing PCa [50–52]. EGFR can regulate VEGF expression by influencing MAPK and PI3K signalling pathways[53]. TGFBR1, DLG4 and KIT are also related to the regulation of MAPK and PI3K signalling pathways[54]. Our results further confirmed the potential biological relevance of 6 mRNAs in PCa. We also found that 6 mRNAs (EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT) were associated with abnormal expression of 5 miRNAs (has-miR-20a, has-miR-20b, has-miR-23b, has-let-7a and has-let-7d) in PCa. In conclusion, the hub genes that we identified may play crucial roles in PCa.

Conclusion

We constructed and analysed mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and TF interaction networks to reveal the key genes associated with prostate cancer. We found that 5 miRNAs (has-miR-20a, has-miR-20b, has-miR-23b, has-let-7a and has-let-7d), 6 lncRNAs (HYMAI, MEG3, IPO5P1, MAG12-AS3, RMST and TRG-AS1), 6 mRNAs (EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT) and 2 TFs (NR3C1, NRG1) play important regulatory roles in the interaction network. The expression levels of EGFR, VEGFA, PIK3R1, DLG4, TGFBR1 and KIT were significantly different between PCa and normal tissues. Further research is needed to specify the molecular mechanism of these hub genes in PCa.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Clinical and histopathological variables of the study cohort in GSE64318.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (34.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. Clinical and histopathological variables of the study cohort in GSE46602.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (21.9KB, docx)
S3 Table. Differentially expressed miRNAs in the GSE64318 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (288.5KB, doc)
S4 Table. Differentially expressed mRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (3MB, doc)
S5 Table. Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (359.5KB, doc)
S1 File. GO and KEGG analysis dataset.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file. (38.4KB, xlsx)
S2 File. PPI analysis dataset.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file. (34.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the study subjects and research personnel for their involvement in the study. The authors would also like to thank Professor Xiaoke Hao and Professor Yueyun Ma for their excellent theoretical assistance.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM.Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917. 10.1002/ijc.25516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(1):7–30. 10.3322/caac.21387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Larson SR, Zhang X, Dumpit R, Coleman I, Lakely B, Roudier M, et al. Characterization of osteoblastic and osteolytic proteins in prostate cancer bone metastases. Prostate. 2013; 73(9): 932–940. 10.1002/pros.22639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rajpar S, Fizazi K. Bone targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer J. 2013;19(1):66–70. 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31827f123e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schaefer A, Jung M, Mollenkopf HJ, Wagner I, Stephan C, Jentzmik F, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of microRNA profiling in prostate carcinoma.Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1166–1176. 10.1002/ijc.24827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nguyen HC, Xie W, Yang M, Hsieh CL, Drouin S, Lee GS, et al. Expression differences of circulating microRNAs in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and low-risk, localized prostate cancer. Prostate. 2013;73(4):346–354. 10.1002/pros.22572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang X, Yuan T, Liang M, Du M, Xia S, Dittmar R,et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):33–41. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guttman M, Rinn JL. Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature. 2012;482(7385):339–346. 10.1038/nature10887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen L, Yao H, Wang K, Liu X. Long Non-Coding RNA MALAT1 Regulates ZEB1 Expression by Sponging miR-143-3p and Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(12):4836–4843. 10.1002/jcb.26158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang YT, Lin TP, Tang JT, Campbell M, Luo YL, Lu SY,et al. HOTAIR is a REST-regulated lncRNA that promotes neuroendocrine differentiation in castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018; pii: S0304-3835 (18)30435-X. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tian C, Deng Y, Jin Y, Shi S, Bi H.Long non-coding RNA RNCR3 promotes prostate cancer progression through targeting miR-185-5p.Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(5):1562–1570 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li W, Dou Z, We S, Zhu Z, Pan D, Jia Z,et al. Long noncoding RNA BDNF-AS is associated with clinical outcomes and has functional role in human prostate cancer. Biomed Pharmacother.2018;102:1105–1110. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Afshar AS, Xu J, Goutsias J. Integrative Identification of Deregulated MiRNA/TF-Mediated Gene Regulatory Loops and Networks in Prostate Cancer. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e100806 10.1371/journal.pone.0100806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu H, He JH, Xiao ZD, Zhang QQ, Chen YQ, Zhou H, et al. Liver-enriched transcription factors regulate microRNA-122 that targets CUTL1 during liver development. Hepatology. 2010;52(4):1431–1442. 10.1002/hep.23818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sunkel B, Wu D, Chen Z, Wang CM, Liu X, Ye Z,et al. Integrative analysis identifies targetable CREB1/FoxA1 transcriptional co-regulation as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(9):4105–4122. 10.1093/nar/gkv1528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA Jr, Kinzler KW. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013; 339(6127): 1546–1558. 10.1126/science.1235122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo Y, Bao Y, Ma M, Yang W. Identification of Key Candidate Genes and Pathways in Colorectal Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatical Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4). pii: E722. 10.3390/ijms18040722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang BD, Ceniccola K, Yang Q, Andrawis R, Patel V, Ji Y,et al. Identification and Functional Validation of Reciprocal microRNA-mRNA Pairings in African American Prostate Cancer Disparities.Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(21):4970–4984. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mortensen MM, Høyer S, Lynnerup AS, Ørntoft TF, Sørensen KD, Borre M2,et al. Expression profiling of prostate cancer tissue delineates genes associated with recurrence after prostatectomy.Sci Rep. 2015;5:16018 10.1038/srep16018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30(1): 207–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diboun I, Wernisch L, Orengo CA, Koltzenburg M. Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:252 10.1186/1471-2164-7-252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell.2005; 120 (1): 15–20. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wong N, Wang X.miRDB: an online resource for microRNA target prediction and functional annotations.Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D146–152. 10.1093/nar/gku1104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paraskevopoulou MD, Vlachos IS, Karagkouni D, Georgakilas G, Kanellos I, Vergoulis T, et al. DIANA-LncBase v2: indexing microRNA targets on non-coding transcripts.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D231–238. 10.1093/nar/gkv1270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1): 25–29. 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chawla K, Tripathi S, Thommesen L, Lægreid A, Kuiper M.TFcheckpoint: a curated compendium of specific DNA-binding RNA polymerase II transcription factors.Bioinformatics. 2013;29(19):2519–2520. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scardoni G, Petterlini M, Laudanna C.Analyzing biological network parameters with CentiScaPe. Bioinformatics.2009;25(21):2857–2859. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Berriz GF, Zhang LV, et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2004;430(6995):88–93. 10.1038/nature02555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tomczak K, Czerwinska P, Wiznerowicz M. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(1A): A68–77. 10.5114/wo.2014.47136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi BVSK,et al. UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses.Neoplasia. 2017;19(8):649–658. 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li B, Dewey CN.RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome.BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li B, Ruotti V, Stewart RM, Thomson JA, Dewey CN.RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty.Bioinformatics. 2010;26(4):493–500. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mano R, Eastham J, Yossepowitch O. The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016; 19(4): 340–348. 10.1038/pcan.2016.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Song C, Chen H, Wang T, Zhang W, Ru G, Lang J. Expression profile analysis of micro RNAs in prostate cancer by next-generation sequencing. Prostate. 2015; 75(5): 500–516. 10.1002/pros.22936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Avril S. [micro RNA expression in breast development and breast cancer]. Pathologe. 2013;34 Suppl 2: 195–200. 10.1007/s00292-013-1878-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferracin M, Veronese A, Negrini M. Micromarkers: miRNAs in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2010;10(3):297–308. 10.1586/erm.10.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Søkilde R, Vincent M, Møller AK, Hansen A, Høiby PE, Blondal T, et al. Efficient identification of miRNAs for classification of tumor origin. J Mol Diagn.2014;16(1):106–115. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang JB, Liu FH, Chen JH, Ge HT, Mu LY, Bao HB, et al. Identifying survival-associated modules fromthe dysregulated triplet network in glioblastoma multiforme. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(4):661–671. 10.1007/s00432-016-2332-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu DF, Wu JT, Wang JM, Liu QZ, Gao ZL, Liu YX. MicroRNA expression profile analysis reveals diagnostic biomarker for human prostate cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3313–3317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cai S, Chen R, Li X, Cai Y, Ye Z, Li S,et al. Downregulation of microRNA-23a suppresses prostate cancer metastasis by targeting the PAK6-LIMK1 signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6(6):3904–3917. 10.18632/oncotarget.2880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wagner S, Ngezahayo A, Murua Escobar H, Nolte I. Role of miRNA let-7 and its major targets in prostate cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:376326 10.1155/2014/376326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Luo G, Wang M, Wu X, Tao D, Xiao X, Wang L, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA MEG3 Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(6):2209–2220. 10.1159/000438577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Puhr M, Hoefer J, Eigentler A, Ploner C, Handle F, Schaefer G, et al. The glucocorticoid receptor is a key player for prostate cancer cell survival and a target for improved antiandrogen therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(4):927–938. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lim SO, Li CW, Xia W, Lee HH, Chang SS, Shen J, et al. EGFR Signaling Enhances Aerobic Glycolysis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to Promote Tumor Growth and Immune Escape. Cancer Res. 2016;76(5):1284–1296. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2478 CAN-15-2478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Daizumoto K, Yoshimaru T, Matsushita Y, Fukawa T, Uehara H, Ono M,et al. A DDX31/mutant-p53/EGFR axis promotes multistep progression of muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(9):2233–2247. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Di Lorenzo G, Tortora G, D'Armiento FP, De Rosa G, Staibano S, Autorino R, et al. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor correlates with disease relapse and progression to androgen-independence in human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8(11): 3438–3444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sorkin A, von Zastrow M. Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(9):609–622. 10.1038/nrm2748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roepstorff K, Grøvdal L, Grandal M, Lerdrup M, van Deurs B. Endocytic downregulation of ErbB receptors: mechanisms and relevance in cancer. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008; 129(5): 563–578. 10.1007/s00418-008-0401-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee C, Whang YM, Campbell P, Mulcrone PL, Elefteriou F, Cho SW,et al. Dual targeting c-met and VEGFR2 in osteoblasts suppresses growth and osteolysis of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2018;414:205–213. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hellwinkel OJ, Rogmann JP, Asong LE, Luebke AM, Eichelberg C, Ahyai S, et al. A comprehensive analysis of transcript signatures of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/protein kinase B signal-transduction pathway in prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008; 101(11):1454–1460. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07540.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wen J, Li R, Wen X, Chou G, Lu J, Wang X, et al. Dysregulation of cell cycle related genes and microRNAs distinguish the low- from high-risk of prostate cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:156 10.1186/s13000-014-0156-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 52.Fonseca-Alves CE, Kobayashi PE, Palmieri C, Laufer-Amorim R. Investigation of c-KIT and Ki67 expression in normal, preneoplastic and neoplastic canine prostate. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13(1):380 10.1186/s12917-017-1304-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Song ZY, Wang F, Cui SX, Qu XJ. Knockdown of CXCR4 Inhibits CXCL12-Induced Angiogenesis in HUVECs through Downregulation of the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT and the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathways.Cancer Invest. 2018;36(1):10–18. 10.1080/07357907.2017.1422512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hamidi A, Song J, Thakur N1, Itoh S, Marcusson A, Bergh A,et al. TGF-β promotes PI3K-AKT signaling and prostate cancer cell migration through the TRAF6-mediated ubiquitylation of p85α. Sci Signal. 2017;10(486): pii: eaal4186. 10.1126/scisignal.aal4186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Clinical and histopathological variables of the study cohort in GSE64318.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (34.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. Clinical and histopathological variables of the study cohort in GSE46602.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file. (21.9KB, docx)
S3 Table. Differentially expressed miRNAs in the GSE64318 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (288.5KB, doc)
S4 Table. Differentially expressed mRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (3MB, doc)
S5 Table. Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the GSE46602 dataset.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (359.5KB, doc)
S1 File. GO and KEGG analysis dataset.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file. (38.4KB, xlsx)
S2 File. PPI analysis dataset.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file. (34.8KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES