Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202742

Individual- and community-level determinants of child immunization in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A multilevel analysis

Pawan Acharya 1,*, Hallgeir Kismul 2, Mala Ali Mapatano 3, Anne Hatløy 4
Editor: Mohammad Ali5
PMCID: PMC6107214  PMID: 30138459

Abstract

Understanding modifiable determinants of full immunization of children provide a valuable contribution to immunization programs and help reduce disease, disability, and death. This study is aimed to assess the individual and community-level determinants of full immunization coverage among children in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This study used data from the Demographic and Health Survey 2013–14 from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data regarding total 3,366 children between 12 and 23 months of age were used in this study. Children who were immunized with one dose of BCG, three doses of polio, three doses of DPT, and a dose of measles vaccine was considered fully immunized. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the prevalence and distribution of full immunization coverage. Two-level multilevel logistic regression analysis, with individual-level (level 1) characteristics nested within community-level (level 2) characteristics, was used to assess the individual- and community-level determinants of full immunization coverage. This study found that about 45.3% [95%CI: 42.02, 48.52] of children aged 12–23 months were fully immunized in the DRC. The results confirmed immunization coverage varied and ranged between 5.8% in Mongala province to 70.6% in Nord-Kivu province. Results from multilevel analysis revealed that, four Antenatal Care (ANC) visits [AOR: 1.64; 95%CI: 1.23, 2.18], institutional delivery [AOR: 2.37; 95%CI: 1.52, 3.72], and Postnatal Care (PNC) service utilization [AOR: 1.43; 95%CI: 1.04, 1.95] were statistically significantly associated with the full immunization coverage. Similarly, children of mothers with secondary or higher education [AOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.81] and from the richest wealth quintile [AOR: 1.96; 95%CI: 1.18, 3.27] had significantly higher odds of being fully immunized compared to their counterparts whose mothers were relatively poorer and less educated. Among the community-level characteristics, residents of the community with a higher rate of institutional delivery [AOR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.59, 3.51] were found to be positively associated with the full immunization coverage. Also, the random effect result found about 35% of the variation in immunization coverage among the communities was attributed to community-level factors.The Democratic Republic of Congo has a noteworthy gap in full immunization coverage. Modifiable factors–particularly health service utilization including four ANC visits, institutional delivery, and postnatal visits–had a strong positive effect on full immunization coverage. The study underlines the importance of promoting immunization programs tailored to the poor and women with little education.

Background

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the world’s highest risk of neonatal deaths sharing 40% of the under-five death globally [1]. With an under-five mortality rate of 94 per 1000 live births, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has one of the highest child death rates in sub-Saharan Africa [2, 3]. Vaccine-preventable diseases such as tuberculosis and lower respiratory tract infection are still the leading causes of death in children in the DRC [4]. Childhood vaccination is, therefore, one of the most effective ways to reduce child mortality rates [5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that immunization averts 2 to 3 million deaths annually, and there is still scope to save an additional 1.5 million lives [6].

Global immunization coverage has increased in the past few decades [7, 8]. The Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) has played a central role in improving immunization coverage. The proportion of children receiving the vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DPT3) vaccine is typically used as a major indicator of the country’s capability of providing immunization services. In 2000, the global DTP3 coverage was 72%, and it increased to 86% by 2016 [9]. There has also been an improvement in measles vaccination. During the 1990s, measles coverage was about 71%, but since 2000 there has been a good increase, and in 2016, nearly 85% of children had received one dose of measles vaccine by their second birthday [9]. However, still, an estimated 19.4 million infants worldwide missed out on basic vaccines in 2015 [9]. About two-thirds of children without immunization coverage live in the DRC, Angola, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Ukraine [9].

Studies have shown that maternal education, socioeconomic status, and maternal service utilization during antenatal care (ANC), during delivery, and postnatal care associated with child immunization [1014]. Additionally, factors such as media exposure, perceptions of vaccination, child’s place of birth (e.g. health facility), and region of residence also influence the immunization coverage among children [1013]. Furthermore, the application of multilevel modeling has shown that community/contextual characteristics such as region or province of residence [12, 15, 16], community maternal education [15, 16], level of ANC utilization [12], level of the institutional delivery [15], and community poverty level [12] are important determinants of immunization service utilization. The DHS surveys are designed in such a way that the individual-level characteristics are nested within community-level (or primary sampling unit level) characteristics. Therefore, the multilevel analysis is a highly recommended tool while further analyzing such data. In fact, omitting the community-level characteristics while estimating the determinants of immunization coverage using the DHS data could bias the results [17].First DHS survey in the DRC in 2007 found that only 31% of 12–23-month-old children were fully immunized [18]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 764,400 children were unimmunized in the DRC in 2014 [19]. The gap in immunization coverage possesses a threat to the DRC’s global commitment to eliminate measles by 2020 [20]; therefore, some researchers have called for better EPI coverage and mass vaccination campaigns [21]. Similarly, previous local studies from Kinshasa and Goma in the DRC have examined factors determining child immunization. The studies have found that fullness and timeliness of immunization is determined by various factors such as the type of clinic in which an infant is enrolled for immunization, socio-economic status, social and family support to mothers, maternal education, and marital status [2224]. There is no national-level study examining factors with implications for full immunization coverage in the DRC till date. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the level of immunization and variables related to the prevalence of immunization at the national level.

This study aims to assess the individual- and community-level determinants of child immunization coverage in the DRC using nationally representative, population-based, demographic and health survey data from 2013–14.

Material and methods

Study area

The DRC is one of the Central African countries with extensive amounts of natural resources. The total area of the DRC is 2.3 million square kilometers which is administratively divided into 26 provinces. The estimated total population of the DRC was 77.8 million in 2012 out of which 70% lived in rural areas.

At the national level, EPI administers the immunization program. The organization produces five-year plans, and these plans estimate the vaccine needs, cold chain supplies, and equipment needed to operate the immunization program. The EPI works in coordination with local partners to quantify the needs of the health zones. This information is then shared with UNICEF, which purchases immunization supplies [25].

The survey

A multistage cluster sampling method was used for the DHS survey (EDS-RDC II). At the first stage, the national territory was divided into twenty-six sample domains corresponding to the DRC’s provinces. For urban areas, neighborhoods of cities and towns were sampled, whereas in rural areas, villages and chiefdoms were sampled. The final sampling unit selected was the cluster (neighborhood or village) and a total of 540 clusters were randomly selected as primary sampling units (PSUs). Subsequently, a fixed number of households were chosen from each of the selected clusters based on the probability proportional to size technique. A total of 18,360 households (5,474 in urban areas in 161 clusters and 12,886 in rural areas in 379 clusters) was drawn. DHS follows standard sampling procedure and detailed information can be obtained from the Measure DHS webpage [26]. Country-specific information is elaborated in the final report [27], which can be downloaded from the DHS website [28].

Participant selection and exclusion criteria

A total of 3,441 children (unweighted number), aged 12–23 months, from 535 primary sampling units (DHS did not collect data from 5 sampling units) were included in this analysis. After adjusting the sample weight and cluster sample design, the sample size was equivalent to 3,366. Mothers, who were interviewed, were between the age group 15–49 years.

Study variables

Dependent variable

The dependent variable for this study is the full immunization coverage among children aged between 12 and 23 months. Information on immunization was collected from the children’s immunization cards and interviews with their mothers. Children who had already taken a dose of BCG, three doses of DPT, three doses of polio, and a dose of measles vaccine were considered fully immunized and rest were considered not fully immunized.

Individual-level characteristics

Child-specific characteristics such as sex, birth order, preceding birth interval, and pregnancy intention were included in the analysis. Similarly, mother/parent-specific characteristics included were mother’s age, father’s age, education, marital status, mother’s occupational status, mother’s autonomy, father’s occupational status, and household wealth status measured in wealth quintile. Mother’s autonomy represents the level of a woman’s participation in making household decisions such as spending money, purchasing household goods/property, visiting friends/relatives and her ability to make decisions regarding her health care. Autonomy was categorized as autonomous if the woman could decide solely or jointly with her husband on all the above-mentioned issues. The socioeconomic group variable wealth quintile was calculated from household assets using principal component analysis and was divided into five categories (poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest), each comprising 20% of the population [29].

Sex of household head, family size, and religion were also included in the analysis. Utilization of health services, including four ANC visits, institutional delivery, and postnatal care visit was also considered for analysis.

Community-level characteristics

Primary sampling units (PSUs) were considered proxies for the community level. Place of residence, distance from the health facility, community poverty rate, community ANC utilization rate, community institutional delivery rate, community postnatal visit rate, community maternal education, community media exposure rate, and community maternal unemployment rate were used as community-level characteristics. Community poverty rate is the proportion of individuals within the community living in the bottom 40% of wealth quintiles (poorer and poorest quintile collectively). Regarding the distance from the health facility variable, women were asked if they have experienced any difficulties in obtaining the medical advice or seeking treatment because of the distance between their home and the health facility. Their response was categorized as either a “big problem” or “not a big problem”, however, no physical distance in meters was measured. Every community-level characteristic, except the place of residence and distance to a health facility, was dichotomized into high and low, based on the median value.

Statistical analysis

The distribution of full immunization coverage, according to the children’s background characteristics was cross-tabulated and the association was measured using the chi-square test. DHS-assigned sample weight was incorporated throughout the analysis. Similarly, bivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the unadjusted association between full immunization coverage and individual- and community-level predictors. The statistical significance was determined at a significance level of .05 and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Independent variables that were statistically significantly associated with immunization coverage in bivariate analysis were considered eligible for multivariate multilevel regression analysis.

A two-level multilevel modeling technique was used, as the individual-level characteristics were nested within the community-level characteristics. Level 1 modeling determined the association between individual-level predictors and childhood full immunization, while level 2 modeling assessed community-level determinants of full immunization.

The multilevel analysis consisted of four regression models. The first model (model 1) is an empty model without any individual- or community-level variables. This model measured the variation among the communities (primary sampling units). Model 2 consists of individual-level characteristics that were significant (p< .05) in the bivariate model. A stepwise backward elimination method was used to restrict the model to variables significantly associated with the immunization coverage. Such significantly associated variable in the previous model was considered eligible for the adjustment in the final model. Similarly, community-level characteristics significantly associated (p< .05) with the outcome variable in the bivariate logistic regression analysis were entered in model 3. This model was also based on a stepwise backward elimination technique. In the final multivariate model (model 4), individual- and community-level characteristics statistically significant in models 2 or 3 were included in the analysis and the final model was determined using stepwise backward elimination technique.

Stata’s “melogit” command was used for the multilevel logistic regression modeling to estimate fixed and random effect parameters. Fixed effects are measured as adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. Similarly, the random effects are the community-level (where the individual-level predictors are nested in) variance. The random effect is measured in the terms of Intra Community Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Proportional Change in Community Level Variance (PCV). ICC is the measure of the percentage variance explained by the community-level variables, while PCV measures the proportional change in the community-level variance between the empty model and the subsequent models [30].

We also assessed two-way and three-way interaction terms; however, there was no statistically significant interaction within and between community- and individual-level predictors. Log-likelihood and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) were used as model fit statistics.

Results

About 45% of children aged between 12 and 23 months were fully immunized in the DRC. About 83% of the children were administered BCG vaccine. Polio coverage was found to be about 91% for the Polio 1, but it was reduced to 65.7% for the third dose (Polio 3). Similarly, about 72% of the children were vaccinated against measles. In the DRC, about 6% of the children aged 12–23 months were never vaccinated. Table 1 shows the coverage for the individual vaccine in the DRC. (Table 1)

Table 1. Status of child immunization coverage in the DRC in 2013–14 (n = 3,366).

Immunization Coverage % [95%CI]
BCG 83.4 [81.26 85.61]
DPT 1 81.3 [78.88 83.62]
DPT 2 73.9 [70.86 76.83]
DPT 3 60.6 [57.27 63.83]
Polio 0* 49.9 [46.57 53.15]
Polio 1 91.7 [90.13 93.19]
Polio 2 84.5 [82.46 86.46]
Polio 3 65.7 [62.68 68.61]
Measles 71.6 [69.16 74.07]
Full immunization 45.3 [42.01 48.52]
No vaccination 5.9 [4.65 7.26]

*Oral polio vaccine (OPV) administered at birth and should be followed by the primary series of 3 OPV doses.

CI: Confidence interval.

Regarding the participant characteristics, there were almost equal numbers of male and female children. Four in every five children were born in a health facility. The same proportion of children had a sibling less than 24 month older than themselves. About 19% of children were born to teenage mothers. About 40% of mothers had a minimum of secondary level education and about 15.2% of the children were from unmarried or single mothers. Four of every five children were from households headed by men. (Table 2)

Table 2. Immunization coverage among 12–23-month-old children according to individual-level background characteristics in the DRC in 2013–14 (n = 3,366).

Characteristics Total Sample Full immunization coverage
  n % % 95% CI  
Sex of child         p = .056
Female 1679 49.9 45.5 [42.26,48.71]  
Male 1687 50.1 45.1 [41.82,48.36]  
Birth order         p = .433
1 646 19.2 49.2 [44.13,55.29]  
2 585 17.4 44.9 [38.38,51.66]  
3 501 14.9 42.7 [36.37,49.28]  
4 455 13.5 46.2 [39.71,52.76]  
5+ 1179 35.0 44.0 [39.67,48.42]  
Place of delivery         p< .001
Home 701 20.8 20.8 [17.13,25.08]  
Health facility 2665 79.2 51.7 [49.09,54.29]  
Preceding birth space<24 months         p = .026
>24 months 2726 81.0 46.5 [43.97,49.08]  
<24 months 640 19.0 39.9 [34.94,45.15]  
Pregnancy intention         p = .506
Intended 2231 66.3 44.7 [41.94,47.49]  
Unintended 1135 33.7 46.4 [42.33,50.46]  
Mother’s age at delivery         p = .941
<20 years 647 19.2 45.8 [40.61,51.11]  
20–34 years 2255 67.0 45.3 [42.50,48.11]  
> = 35 years 464 13.8 44.4 [38.36,50.57]  
Father’s age         p< .001
<25 years 179 5.3 40.2 [30.60,50.55]  
25–34 years 1193 35.5 44.9 [41.04,48.80]  
> = 35 years 1699 50.5 53.9 [50.71,57.10]  
Missing 295 8.8    
Mother’s education         p< .001
Below secondary 2035 60.5 39.0 [36.20,41.96]  
Secondary or higher 1331 39.5 54.8 [51.09,58.43]  
Father’s education         p = .107
Below secondary 1158 34.4 42.7 [38.97,46.50]  
Secondary or higher 2208 65.6 46.6 [43.75,49.50]  
Sex of household head         p = .126
Male 2666 79.2 44.5 [41.85,47.08]  
Female 700 20.8 48.8 [43.90,53.72]  
Marital Status         p = .608
Unmarried/single 512 15.2 46.7 [40.82,52.66]  
Married or living with partner 2854 84.8 45.0 [42.53,47.51]  
4ANC visit         p< .001
No or <3 visits 1814 53.88 38.6 [35.58,41.73]  
4 or more 1552 46.12 53.0 [49.66,56.40]  
TT before childbirth         p = .036
No 2409 71.6 43.7 [41.03,46.39]  
Yes 957 28.4 49.2 [44.81,53.65]  
Postnatal visit         p < .001
No 2803 83.3 43.1 [40.61,45.58]  
PNC within 2 months 563 16.7 56.1 [50.31,61.81]  
Religion         p = .060
Catholic 898 26.7 47.7 [43.17,52.33]  
Protestant 980 29.1 44.0 [39.68,48.49]  
Other Christians 1234 36.7 46.4 [42.75,50.17]  
Other minorities 255 7.6 35.6 [29.11,42.69]  
Mothers occupation         p = .003
Not working 645 19.2 51.1 [45.70,56.40]  
Professional/technical/managerial 981 29.1 48.2 [43.98,52.51]  
Agriculture/unskilled/manual 1741 51.7 41.5 [38.33,44.64]  
Fathers occupation         p< .001
Not working 62 1.8 56.9 [37.02,74.82]  
Professional/technical/managerial 1505 44.7 50.1 [46.74,53.50]  
Agriculture/unskilled/manual 1619 48.1 39.6 [36.35,42.98]  
Missing 181 5.4 51.5 [42.00,60.81]  
Family size         p = .320
Small (<4 members) 772 22.9 43.7 [39.00,48.50]  
Medium (4–6 members) 1020 30.3 47.9 [43.67,52.23]  
Large (>8 members) 1574 46.8 44.3 [41.05,47.62]  
Exposure to mass media         p< .001
No 1858 55.2 38.9 [35.99,41.84]  
Some exposure 1508 44.8 53.1 [49.57,56.67]  
Wealth quintile         p< .001
Poorest 748 22.2 36.1 [31.61,40.82]  
Poorer 741 22.0 36.4 [31.57,41.56]  
Middle 645 19.2 43.7 [38.59,48.99]  
Richer 636 18.9 49.5 [44.11,54.80]  
Richest 596 17.7 65.0 [59.71,69.92]  
Women’s autonomy         p = .029
No autonomy 2570 76.3 43.9 [41.23,46.49]  
Autonomous 796 23.7 49.9 [45.16,54.54]  
Total (n = 3366) 3366 100.0 45.3 [42.98,47.57]  

CI: Confidence interval. p-values represent the results of weighted data.

The sex difference in immunization coverage among the children was not significant. According to the place of delivery, only one among every five children born at home was fully immunized, whereas every second child born in a health facility was fully immunized. The percentage of full immunization coverage was higher among the children of mothers who had 4 ANC visits, gave birth in a health facility, and made postnatal visits. Similarly, the percentage of children being fully immunized was found higher in upper wealth quintiles in comparison to lower quintiles. The coverage ranges from 36.1% among the poorest to 65% among the richest wealth quintile. The proportion of fully immunized children were higher if the mothers had autonomy in household decision making or if they had mass media exposure. (Table 2)

Regarding community-level characteristics, about two-thirds of the children were from rural areas. Distance to the health facility was a challenge to access the health care for about two in every five (41.2%) of the mothers. Similarly, about 45% of the children were from the communities with low ANC utilization. On the contrary, a majority (69.3%) of the children were from communities with high institutional delivery rates. (Table 3)

Table 3. Immunization coverage among 12–23-month-old children according to their contextual (community-level) background characteristics in the DRC in 2013–14 (n = 3,366).

Characteristics Sample Full immunization coverage 
  n % % 95% CI  
Place of residence         p< .001
Rural 2283 67.8 41.6 [38.74,44.52]  
Urban 1083 32.2 53.0 [49.26,56.69]  
Distance from the health facility         p< .001
Big problem 1387 41.2 39.2 [35.88,42.69]  
Not a big problem 1979 58.8 49.5 [46.42,52.58]  
Community mass media         p< .001
Low 1649 48.98 38.1 [35.06,41.33]  
High 1717 51.02 52.1 [48.80,55.39]  
Community poverty         p< .001
Low 1723 51.2 53.6 [50.41,56.65]  
High 1643 48.8 36.6 [33.35,39.94]  
Community maternal ANC utilization         p< .001
Low 1525 45.3 39.6 [36.40,42.96]  
High 1841 54.7 49.9 [46.73,53.13]  
Community institutional delivery         p< .001
Low 1034 30.7 25.9 [22.37,29.71]  
High 2332 69.3 53.9 [51.07,56.64]  
Community maternal unemployment         P< .001
Low 1982 58.9 42.0 [39.04,45.02]  
High 1384 41.1 49.9 [46.37,53.50]  
Community maternal education         p< .001
Low 1746 51.9 39.1 [36.18,42.03]  
High 1620 48.1 52.0 [48.42,55.46]  

p- values represent the results from weighted data. CI: Confidence interval

Full immunization coverage was slightly lower in rural areas compared to urban areas (41.6% vs 53%). Similarly, about 40% of children from areas with low ANC utilization and about 50% of the high ANC utilization area were fully immunized. According to the institutional delivery utilization, a quarter of children from low coverage areas (25.9%) and more than half (53.9%) of children from high coverage areas were fully immunized. Similarly, about 39% of the children from the communities with lower maternal education rates were fully immunized, whereas 52% of the children from the communities with higher maternal education were found fully immunized. (Table 3)

Across the provinces, full immunization coverage ranged from 5.8% in Mongala to 70.6% in Nord-Kivu. The Nord-Kivu province was the only one which had higher coverage than the capital Kinshasa (67.7%). Fig 1, S1 Fig

Fig 1. Full immunization coverage in DRC (2013–14).

Fig 1

Table 4 shows the results of the multilevel multivariate logistic regression analysis. The null model (Model 1) revealed significant variability on full immunization coverage across communities [τ = 1.82; p<0.001]. Similarly, the ICC showed that 50% of the variability in the odds of being fully immunized was due to community-level factors. (Table 4)

Table 4. Multivariate multilevel logistic regression analysis of individual and community level factors with childhood full immunization among 12–23-month-old children in the DRC in 2013–14 (n = 3,366).

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Characteristics AOR(95%CI) AOR(95%CI) AOR(95%CI) AOR(95%CI)
Mother’s education        
Below secondary   1.00   1.00
Secondary or higher   1.39 (1.02, 1.90)   1.32 (1.00, 1.81)
ANC visits        
No or <4   1.00   1.00
> = 4   1.67 (1.25, 2.23)   1.64 (1.23, 2.18)
Place of delivery        
Home   1.00   1.00
Health facility   3.07 (2.04, 4.60)   2.37 (1.52, 3.72)
Postnatal care        
No   1.00   1.00
Yes   1.44 (1.05, 1.970   1.43 (1.04, 1.95)
Wealth status        
Poorest   1.00   1.00
Poorer   0.92 (0.67, 1.26)   0.90 (0.65, 1.24)
Middle   1.03 (0.73, 1.47)   0.99 (0.70, 1.41)
Richer   1.50 (0.99, 2.29)   1.36 (0.89, 2.06)
Richest   2.44 (1.48, 4.03)   1.96 (1.18, 3.27)
Community media exposure        
Low     1.00  
High     1.37 (1.01, 1.86)  
Community poverty        
Low     1.00  
High     0.69 (0.49, 0.97)  
Community institutional delivery        
Low     1.00 1.00
High     3.95 (2.79, 5.58) 2.36 (1.59, 3.51)
Intercept 0.65 (0.55, 0.76) 0.12 (0.08, 0.18) 0.27 (0.18, 0.41) 0.11 (0.07, 0.16)
Random effect        
Community variance (SE) 1.82 (0.26) 1.40 (0.23) 1.29 (0.20) 1.34 (0.22)
PCV%   22.94 29.31 26.40
ICC% 50.12 37.37 33.43 35.25
Model fit statistics        
Log pseudolikelihood -2046.58 -1936.55 -1987.64 -1926.94
AIC 4097.16 3895.09 3985.27 3875.89

AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval. ICC: Intra-community correlation coefficient (ICC); PCV: Proportional change in community-level variance; AIC: Akaike’s information criterion. Model 1: Null/baseline model without any predictor variable. Model 2: Adjusted for individual-level predictor variables only. Model 3: Adjusted for community-level predictor variables only. Model 4: Adjusted for the individual- and community-level predictor variables.

After adjusting for individual-level characteristics, the variation in the odds of a child having full immunization remained statistically significant [τ = 1.40; p<0.001] across the communities. At the same time, about 37% of the variance in full immunization among the children was because of community-level factors. Similarly, about 23% of the variation in the odds of children being fully immunized between communities was attributed to the individual factors adjusted in the model (Model 2).

After adjusting the community-level characteristics, model 3 found a slightly reduced variance of a child being fully immunized [τ = 1.29] across the communities, as compared to the variance reported in model 2, and the variance also lost the statistical significance (p> .05). Model 3 further identified that about 33% of the variability in the odds of a child being fully vaccinated was due to community-level characteristics (ICC = 33.4%). Similarly, about 29% of the variability in the odds of children being fully immunized between communities could be explained by the community-level characteristics included in Model 3 (PCV = 29.3%).

Finally, after the statistical adjustment of the individual- and community-level characteristics simultaneously, Model 4 depicted significant variability across the communities with regards to the odds of a child being fully immunized [τ = 1.34; p<0.001]. About 35% of the variability in the odds of a child being fully vaccinated was due to the community-level factors (ICC = 35.3%). Similarly, the PCV revealed that about 26% of the variance in the odds of full immunization (PCV = 26.4%) across communities was due to the simultaneous effect of both individual and community-level characteristics adjusted in Model 4.

Furthermore, the final model found four ANC visits [AOR: 1.64; 95%CI: 1.23, 2.18], institutional delivery [AOR: 2.37; 95%CI: 1.52, 3.72], and postnatal care (PNC) service utilization [AOR: 1.43; 95%CI: 1.04, 1.95] were significantly associated with full immunization of children. Similarly, children of mothers with secondary or higher education [AOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.81] and from the richest wealth quintile [AOR: 1.96; 95%CI: 1.18, 3.27] had significantly higher odds of being fully immunized compared to their counterparts. Among the community-level characteristics, a higher rate of institutional delivery [AOR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.59, 3.51] was found to be positively associated with immunization coverage.

Discussion

This study found a significant gap in immunization coverage in the DRC; only about 45% of children were fully immunized, an increase from 30.6% in 2007 [18]. The coverage of full immunization reported here was found to be higher than in some other sub-Saharan countries, including Ethiopia (24%) and Nigeria (25%) [31].

The study showed that there are significant regional differences in full immunization coverage. The results revealed that the coverage is especially poor in provinces such as Mongala and Sankuru. For example, Mongala, Sankuru, and Tshuapa provinces have poor health infrastructure, including a weak cold chain system, which is a major barrier to accessing the immunization program. Similarly, Tanganyika also has low vaccination coverage. Many local militias operate in this province. Political instability can therefore perhaps explain the province’s poor vaccination coverage. Despite the decades-long armed conflict, the immunization coverage in North and South Kivu is higher than in many other provinces. This might be because of the continuous effort of several organizations working in the immunization program. Our study is in line with other studies that have found regional differences in vaccine coverage [13]. While we have highlighted political factors that create geographical inequalities in vaccination coverage, other studies have highlighted factors such as cultural beliefs, health service capacity, modes of vaccine procurement, supply, and cold-chain management as determinants of immunization coverage [13, 25, 32].

The higher odds of being fully immunized found among children whose mothers did four ANC visits can be explained by the fact that ANC visits provide an opportunity to promote health care utilization, including institutional delivery, PNC, immunization, and family planning [3335]. The association between ANC visits and child immunization is consistent with a study from India, which showed that ANC visits provide a platform for making mothers aware of child immunization [36]. This finding is consistent with several other studies [35, 37, 38].

Similarly, children born at a health facility were more likely to be fully immunized. The results corroborate with studies from Ethiopia [37], Uganda [39] Kenya [40], other SSA countries [35], and India [41, 42]. The finding that institutional delivery increased the chances of children being fully immunized can be explained by the fact that women who give birth at a facility are probably more likely to be aware of their own and their children’s health status. Women who utilized institutional delivery service, might also, be more confident in utilizing preventive services like child immunization. Also, administration of the BCG vaccine quickly after childbirth and vaccination counseling at a health facility might have contributed to the higher odds of full immunization.

This study found higher odds of being fully immunized when PNC was given by a skilled provider within two months after childbirth. A similar association between postnatal visits and full immunization coverage has been reported in several other studies, including a study of 14 LMICs [38], regional studies in Africa [31, 35] and a systematic review [43]. The association between PNC visits and immunization could be explained by the fact that an early postnatal visit provides an opportunity to initiate BCG vaccination. Also, DPT and polio vaccinations can be administered during PNC visits which could increase compliance with the immunization program and create an opportunity to initiate vaccination among children who are not immunized [12]. This study found that the ANC, delivery care, and PNC visits were independently associated with the full immunization coverage. A study from SSA countries reported similar findings [35]. An explanation for this might be that a continuum of care, with a four, recommended ANC visits, motivates pregnant women to give birth in a health facility. During the institutional delivery, a woman receives, not only the skilled care but also counseling and education to use the postnatal care and immunization services. ANC and institutional delivery open the door of opportunity for frequent contacts between health workers and a pregnant woman or recently delivered mothers, which eventually is more likely to result in higher compliance towards recommended immunization schedule [35].

This study showed that families with relatively higher wealth were more likely to fully immunize their children. Similar findings were published in studies from Nigeria [15, 31], Burkina Faso [44], Swaziland [45] and Ethiopia [12]. This finding was also consistent with a synthesis of DHS data in sub-Saharan Africa [16] and studies from South Asia, including Bangladesh [46] and India [41, 47]. The positive correlation between wealth and immunization can be explained by the fact that wealthier people tend to make better use of health services and thus regularly receive information about the benefit of child immunization [48]. On the other hand, high travel costs and long distances to health facilities can restrict poor people’s willingness to immunize their children [49].

Children from mothers with secondary or higher education had higher odds of being fully immunized. Similar findings were reported in studies from Ethiopia [50], Nigeria [31, 51], Kenya [40] and in India [47, 52]. Education was identified as a strong predictor of full immunization in children in several other studies [16, 37, 41, 42, 53]. Educated mothers are generally more aware of the importance of available health and immunization services, have better communication skills, and tend to better utilize available services [54, 55].

In regard to community characteristics, this study showed that there was a positive correlation between community institutional delivery and full immunization coverage. In line with this observation, research from Nigeria [15] and Ethiopia [50], also has found that children residing in communities with high institutional delivery service utilization were likely to be fully immunized.

Significance and policy implications of this study

The link between full immunization coverage and child mortality has been well demonstrated by several researchers. A full immunization coverage as low as 45% suggests that children from the DRC are at high risk of avoidable death. A recent study by Doshi et al. showed that Congolese children are already at high risk of measles [56].

A landscape analysis of the DRC’s immunization program conducted by PATH provided major recommendations around supply chain management and raised awareness about the guiding policy, activities, and responsibilities across the national, provincial, and local health facility levels [25]. Similarly, UNICEF appealed for actions against the critical pitfalls of the DRC’s immunization program, including unreliability of government funding for vaccines, ineffective cold chain management, lack of proper support from health workers in certain regions and insufficient coordination of immunization stakeholders at provincial level [32].

This study demonstrates the links between ANC, institutional delivery, PNC visits and immunization coverage. Programs that make efforts to improve ANC utilization, institutional delivery rate, and PNC coverage should, therefore, draw attention to these links. Our study demonstrates the need to properly target vulnerable groups. Vaccination programs must pay special attention to women with low or no education. Similarly, programs also must direct their interventions for women and children living in poorer households. These modifiable determinants of full immunization could be integrated with supply-side factors to make a comprehensive package to improve immunization coverage in the DRC.

Strengths, weaknesses, and limitations

This study identified important predictors of childhood full immunization in the DRC. It has described community-level variables in a multilevel model. Therefore, unlike studies with only individual characteristics, it has minimized bias due to omitted variables. Furthermore, the results are based on a nationally representative survey, making the findings generalizable with potentially important policy implications.

The study has some limitations. It is based on cross-sectional survey data, which makes it difficult to establish causal relationships between predictors and outcome variables. Data related to vaccination coverage is based on the records found in children’s immunization cards and interview with mothers. Therefore, some bias might have been introduced because of self-reporting. Also, because full immunization coverage (yes, no) is used as a binary outcome variable, children who were partially immunized were not analyzed separately, as it was outside the scope of this study, but were considered not fully immunized. Moreover, community-level characteristics were categorized as low or high based on the median value; hence, there was some loss of information as we dichotomized these continuous variables. Due to the retrospective nature of data, findings might be subject to recall bias. Furthermore, this study has not fully taken into consideration potential influential factors for immunization coverage, such as quality of service, counseling provided, follow-up and reminder communication, and distance to the immunization clinic.

Conclusion

The DRC has a noteworthy gap in full immunization coverage. Individual-level characteristics,–particularly health services utilization, such as four ANC visits, institutional delivery, and postnatal visits–had a strong positive effect on full immunization coverage. Institutional delivery was also determined as a community-level factor. The findings suggest that maternal service sites might be effective in promoting full immunization coverage. Similarly, relatively higher wealth status and a minimum of secondary education had a positive effect on full immunization coverage. The study underlines the importance of promoting immunization programs tailored to the poor and women with little education. A major finding is a huge variation in immunization coverage across provinces. Efforts should be made to better understand the situation in provinces with low coverage.

Ethical approval

Data from the Demographic and Health Survey, DRC (2013–14) was used for this study with the permission from the Measure DHS program. Ethical approval for the survey was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health (ESP) of the University of Kinshasa and the ICF International Institutional Review Board. Informed consent to participate in the survey was obtained verbally from each respondent before the interview was conducted. A special statement explaining the purpose of the study was included at the beginning of the household and the individual questionnaires. Participation in the survey was completely voluntary and the respondents were informed that they had the right to refuse to answer any questions or stop the interview at any point. The informed consent statement was read aloud exactly as it was written before the respondents were asked to participate in the interview. For participants under 18 years of age, verbal consent was obtained from their parent or legal guardian. After this, the interviewer signed his/her name attesting to the fact that he/she had read the consent statement to the respondent. However, given the low level of literacy and as the information requested was neither controversial nor sensitive; no written consent was obtained. The ethics committee of the School of Public Health of the University of Kinshasa and the ICF international Institutional Review Board waived the requirement for written consent of participants and approved the consent procedure used in this study.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Level of full immunization coverage in DRC.pdf.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Measure DHS program for allowing access to the DHS dataset for this analysis. The authors are also deeply indebted to all the women who took part in the survey. The authors are thankful to Fafo, Institute for Labour and Social Research for proving support for professional copyediting service for this manuscript.

Abbreviations

BCG

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin

DTP

diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

DRC

Democratic Republic of Congo

EPI

Expanded Program on Immunization

ICC

Intracommunity correlation coefficient (ICC)

PCV

proportional change in community-level variance

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

The third-party DHS data used in this study can be found in publicly available repositories owned by the DHS program. A request to download the dataset can be submitted to the DHS Program at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Using-Datasets-forAnalysis.cfm. Following approval, a non-transferrable dataset can be freely downloaded from the data repository. The authors did not have any special privileges in obtaining this data set.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Beise J. Levels and trends in child mortality. Report 2015. Estimates developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2017. United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, 2017., 2017 2017. Report No.
  • 3.UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN DESA Population Division. Child Mortality Estimates: UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation; 2015 [updated 10/16/2017]. Available from: http://www.childmortality.org/index.php?r=site/graph#ID=COD.
  • 4.Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). The Democratic Republic of the Congo. Available at http://www.healthdata.org/democratic-republic-congo. Accessed on 15 October 2018. [cited 2018 January 31]. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/democratic-republic-congo.
  • 5.Lassi ZS, Mallick D, Das JK, Mal L, Salam RA, Bhutta ZA. Essential interventions for child health. Reproductive health. 2014;11(1):S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Organization(WHO). Immunization coverage: World Health Organization (WHO),; [updated March 2017; cited 2017 30 May]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs378/en/.
  • 7.Bank World. Countdown to 2015 for maternal, newborn, and child survival: the 2008 report on tracking coverage of interventions. The Lancet. 2008;371(9620):1247–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duclos P, Okwo-Bele J-M, Gacic-Dobo M, Cherian T. Global immunization: status, progress, challenges and future. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2009;9(1):S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). World Health Organization (WHO); United Nations Children's Fund(UNICEF). Coverage estimates 2015 revision, for 194 WHO Member States. Slide produced in July 2016 by Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals, (IVB), World Health Organization: WHO; Unicef,; [updated July 2017; cited 2017 30 May]. Available from: http://www.who.int/immunization/newsroom/press/who_immuniz_2015.pdf?ua=1.
  • 10.Asfaw AG, Koye DN, Demssie AF, Zeleke EG, Gelaw YA. Determinants of default to fully completion of immunization among children aged 12 to 23 months in south Ethiopia: unmatched case-control study. The Pan African medical journal. 2016;23:100 Epub 2016/05/26. 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.100.7879 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4867184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lakew Y, Bekele A, Biadgilign S. Factors influencing full immunization coverage among 12–23 months of age children in Ethiopia: evidence from the national demographic and health survey in 2011. BMC public health. 2015;15:728 Epub 2015/08/01. 10.1186/s12889-015-2078-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4520202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abadura SA, Lerebo WT, Kulkarni U, Mekonnen ZA. Individual and community level determinants of childhood full immunization in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. BMC public health. 2015;15:972 Epub 2015/09/30. 10.1186/s12889-015-2315-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4587824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mbengue MAS, Sarr M, Faye A, Badiane O, Camara FBN, Mboup S, et al. Determinants of complete immunization among Senegalese children aged 12–23 months: evidence from the demographic and health survey. BMC public health. 2017;17(1):630 Epub 2017/07/08. 10.1186/s12889-017-4493-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5501441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zaidi SM, Khowaja S, Kumar Dharma V, Khan AJ, Chandir S. Coverage, timeliness, and determinants of immunization completion in Pakistan: evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey (2006–07). Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2014;10(6):1712–20. Epub 2014/05/03. 10.4161/hv.28621 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5396236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antai D. Inequitable childhood immunization uptake in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis of individual and contextual determinants. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2009;9(1):181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiysonge CS, Uthman OA, Ndumbe PM, Hussey GD. Individual and contextual factors associated with low childhood immunisation coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37905 10.1371/journal.pone.0037905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diez-Roux AV. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American journal of public health. 1998;88(2):216–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ministère du Plan/Congo, Macro International. République Démocratique du Congo Enquête Démographique et de Santé 2007. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Ministère du Plan/Congo and Macro International, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC). Fostering Ownership of Childhood Immunization Data in the Democratic Republic of Congo [cited 2018 5 January ]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/immunization/stories/child-immunization-drc.htm.
  • 20.World Health Organization. Global measles and rubella strategic plan 2012–2020. 2012. Report No: ISBN. 2015;978(92):4.
  • 21.Cuesta JG, Mukembe N, Valentiner-Branth P, Stefanoff P, Lenglet A. Measles vaccination coverage survey in Moba, Katanga, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2013: need to adapt routine and mass vaccination campaigns to reach the unreached. PLoS currents. 2015;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kabudi AM, Lutala PM, Kazadi JM, Bardella IJ. Prevalence and associated factors of partially/non-immunization of under-five in Goma city, Democratic Republic of Congo: a community-based cross-sectional survey. The Pan African medical journal. 2015;20:38 Epub 2015/06/02. 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.38.4483 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4441138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zivich PN, Kiketa L, Kawende B, Lapika B, Yotebieng M. Vaccination Coverage and Timelines Among Children 0–6 Months in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Prospective Cohort Study. Maternal and child health journal. 2017;21(5):1055–64. Epub 2017/01/07. 10.1007/s10995-016-2201-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mapatano MA, Kayembe K, Piripiri L, Nyandwe K. Immunisation-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of mothers in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. South African Family Practice. 2008;50(2):61–e. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.PATH. Immunization in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Landscape Analysis and Policy Recommendations. Seattle: PATH; 2016. Available on: http://www.path.org/publications/files/APP_drc_landscape_rpt.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.DHS Methodology. Obtained from http://dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/DHS-Methodology.cfm. Accessed on 19 June 2017: DHS Program; [cited 2017 19 June 2017 ]. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/DHS-Methodology.cfm.
  • 27.République Démocratique du Congo. Enquête Démographique et de Santé (EDS-RDC) 2013–2014. Kinshasa: Ministère du Plan et Suivi de la Mise en oeuvre de la Révolution de la Modernité; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The DHS Program; Obtained from: https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-421.cfm. Accessed on 26 September 2017 [cited 2017 September 26]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-421.cfm.
  • 29.Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health policy and planning. 2006;21(6):459–68. 10.1093/heapol/czl029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2006;60(4):290–7. 10.1136/jech.2004.029454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olorunsaiye CZ, Degge H. Variations in the Uptake of Routine Immunization in Nigeria: Examining Determinants of Inequitable Access. Global Health Communication. 2016;2(1):19–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.UNICEF. Annual Report 2014: Democratic Republic of Congo. UNICEF, 2014. Available on: https://www.unicef.org/about/annualreport/files/Democratic_Republic_of_Congo_Annual_Report_2014.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Acharya P, Adhikari TB, Neupane D, Thapa K, Bhandari PM. Correlates of institutional deliveries among teenage and non-teenage mothers in Nepal. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185667 10.1371/journal.pone.0185667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Do M, Hotchkiss D. Relationships between antenatal and postnatal care and post-partum modern contraceptive use: evidence from population surveys in Kenya and Zambia. BMC health services research. 2013;13(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Owili PO, Muga MA, Chou Y-J, Hsu Y-HE, Huang N, Chien L-Y. Associations in the continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health: a population-based study of 12 sub-Saharan Africa countries. BMC public health. 2016;16(1):414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dixit P, Dwivedi LK, Ram F. Strategies to improve child immunization via antenatal care visits in India: a propensity score matching analysis. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e66175 10.1371/journal.pone.0066175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Etana B, Deressa W. Factors associated with complete immunization coverage in children aged 12–23 months in Ambo Woreda, Central Ethiopia. BMC public health. 2012;12:566 10.1186/1471-2458-12-566 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3508824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Restrepo-Méndez MC, Barros AJ, Wong KL, Johnson HL, Pariyo G, Wehrmeister FC, et al. Missed opportunities in full immunization coverage: findings from low-and lower-middle-income countries. Global health action. 2016;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Odiit A, Amuge B. Comparison of vaccination status of children born in health units and those born at home. East African medical journal. 2003;80(1):3–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Maina LC, Karanja S, Kombich J. Immunization coverage and its determinants among children aged 12–23 months in a peri-urban area of Kenya. The Pan African medical journal. 2013;14:3 Epub 2013/03/19. 10.11604/pamj.2013.14.3.2181 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3597865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shrivastwa N, Gillespie BW, Kolenic GE, Lepkowski JM, Boulton ML. Predictors of vaccination in India for children aged 12–36 months. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015;49(6):S435–S44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar D, Aggarwal A, Gomber S. Immunization status of children admitted to a tertiary-care hospital of north India: reasons for partial immunization or non-immunization. Journal of health, population and nutrition. 2010:300–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lassi ZS, Das JK, Salam RA, Bhutta ZA. Evidence from community level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reproductive health. 2014;11(2):S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sanou A, Simboro S, Kouyaté B, Dugas M, Graham J, Bibeau G. Assessment of factors associated with complete immunization coverage in children aged 12–23 months: a cross-sectional study in Nouna district, Burkina Faso. BMC international health and human rights. 2009;9(1):S10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tsawe M, Moto A, Netshivhera T, Ralesego L, Nyathi C, Susuman AS. Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services and childhood immunization in Swaziland. International journal for equity in health. 2015;14(1):32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rahman M, Obaida-Nasrin S. Factors affecting acceptance of complete immunization coverage of children under five years in rural Bangladesh. Salud pública de méxico. 2010;52(2):134–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kumar A, Mohanty SK. Socio-economic differentials in childhood immunization in India, 1992–2006. Journal of Population Research. 2011;28(4):301–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mohan P. Inequities in coverage of preventive child health interventions: the rural drinking water supply program and the universal immunization program in Rajasthan, India. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(2):241–4. 10.2105/AJPH.2003.036848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pande RP, Yazbeck AS. What's in a country average? Wealth, gender, and regional inequalities in immunization in India. Social Science & Medicine. 2003;57(11):2075–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abadura SA, Lerebo WT, Kulkarni U, Mekonnen ZA. Individual and community level determinants of childhood full immunization in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. BMC public health. 2015;15(1):972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fatiregun AA, Okoro AO. Maternal determinants of complete child immunization among children aged 12–23 months in a southern district of Nigeria. Vaccine. 2012;30(4):730–6. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Phukan RK, Barman MP, Mahanta J. Factors associated with immunization coverage of children in Assam, India: over the first year of life. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2009;55(4):249–52. 10.1093/tropej/fmn025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pebley AR, Goldman N, Rodriguez G. Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: do family and community matter? Demography. 1996;33(2):231–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Govindasamy P, Ramesh B. Maternal education and the utilization of maternal and child health services in India. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vikram K, Vanneman R, Desai S. Linkages between maternal education and childhood immunization in India. Social science & medicine. 2012;75(2):331–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Doshi RH, Alfonso VH, Hoff NA, Mukadi P, Gerber S, Bwaka A, et al. Evidence of Mumps Infection Among Children in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2017;36(5):462–6. 10.1097/INF.0000000000001483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Level of full immunization coverage in DRC.pdf.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

The third-party DHS data used in this study can be found in publicly available repositories owned by the DHS program. A request to download the dataset can be submitted to the DHS Program at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Using-Datasets-forAnalysis.cfm. Following approval, a non-transferrable dataset can be freely downloaded from the data repository. The authors did not have any special privileges in obtaining this data set.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES