Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2018 Aug 17;6:300. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00300

Chiral 1H NMR of Atropisomeric Quinazolinones With Enantiopure Phosphoric Acids

Chaofei Wu 1, Hongxin Liu 1,*, Juan Li 1, Hong-Ping Xiao 1, Xinhua Li 1, Jun Jiang 1,*
PMCID: PMC6107746  PMID: 30175093

Abstract

A chiral phosphoric acid promoted enantioselective NMR analysis of atropisomeric quinazolinones was described, in which a variety of racemic arylquinazolinones such as afloqualone and IC-87114 were well recognized with up to 0. 21 ppm ΔΔδ value. With this method, the optical purities of different non-racemic substrates can be fast evaluated with high accuracy.

Keywords: chiral recognition, 1H NMR analysis, quinazolinones, chiral phosphoric acid, high accuracy

After the first experimental detection of atropisomerism by Christie and Kenner in 1922 (Christie and Kenner, 1922), axial chirality was gradually recognized as an important type of molecular asymmetry which derived from the restricted rotation of a single bond in biaryls, amines, etc. For example, axially chiral BINAP and its analogs were found to be excellent ligands in various asymmetric catalytic transformations (Miyashita et al., 1980; Akutagawa, 1995; Kumobayashi et al., 2001; Brunel, 2005, 2007; Genet et al., 2014), while a lot of optically active biaryl natural products were successfully isolated and identified in the past few decades (Bringmann et al., 2011; Smyth et al., 2015). Besides, atropisomers were found to exhibit different pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in many cases (Eichelbaum and Gross, 1996; Clayden et al., 2009). Thus, exploring efficient chiral recognition and determination method for atropisomeric compounds is crucial to the asymmetric synthesis as well as structure-bioactivity study. With the fast development of analysis technology, GC (Schurig and Nowotny, 1990), IR (Reetz et al., 1998), HPLC (Han, 1997), circular dichroism (Ding et al., 1999; Nieto et al., 2008, 2010; Ghosn and Wolf, 2009), fluorescence spectroscopy (James et al., 1995; Mei and Wolf, 2004; Pu, 2004; Zhao et al., 2004; Li et al., 2005; Tumambac and Wolf, 2005; Liu et al., 2009), electrophoresis technologies (Reetz et al., 2000) and NMR spectroscopy have been frequently employed in chiral determinations. Among these methods, we are particularly interested in the NMR based chiral analysis method which employs chiral shift reagents (CSRs) (Frazer et al., 1971; Goering et al., 1971; Yeh et al., 1986; Ghosh et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2005) or chiral solvating reagents (CSAs) (Pirkle, 1966; Lancelot et al., 1969; Parker, 1991; Wenzel and Wilcox, 2003; Seco et al., 2004; Lovely and Wenzel, 2006; Ema et al., 2007; Wenzel, 2007; Iwaniuk and Wolf, 2010; Moon et al., 2010; Gualandi et al., 2011; Pham and Wenzel, 2011; Quinn et al., 2011; Wenzel and Chisholm, 2011; Ma et al., 2012; Labuta et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2015; Akdeniz et al., 2016; Bian et al., 2016a,b; Huang et al., 2016) to directly differentiate enantiomers of the analytes, since it takes many advantages such as easy operation, fast evaluation, broad analyte scope and so on. In 2017, we reported a chiral phosphoric acid (CPA) promoted enantioselective NMR analysis of indoloquinazoline alkaloid type tertiary alcohols with high efficiency and wide application; this methodology was also employed in the fast optimization of reaction conditions in amino acid metal salt catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction via direct analysis of the reaction mixture without purification (Liu et al., 2017). Inspired by this result and given the growing interest in axially chiral compounds, atropisomeric arylquinazolinones, which are constituents of various biologically active natural products and pharmaceutical compounds, were chosen as the next target to further evaluate the chiral recognition ability of chiral phosphoric acids (Figure 1). Herein, we wish to report our preliminary results on this topic: in the presence of 0.2–1.5 equiv. of α-naphthyl phosphoric acid, a variety of racemic arylquinazolinones including afloqualone and IC-87114 were well recognized with up to 0.21 ppm ΔΔδ value; additionally, the corresponding analysis system can also be employed in the accurate determination of enantioselectivities of chiral arylquinazolinones.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chiral 1H NMR analysis of arylquinazolinones with a chiral phosphoric acid.

Our exploration of this hypothesis began with evaluating the interaction between chiral phosphoric acids 1 and racemic 2-(furan-2-yl)-3-(o-tolyl)quinazolin-4(3H)-one 2a in CDCl3 at 25°C. As shown in Table 1, after additions of 1 equiv. of chiral phosphoric acids to racemic 2a, chemical shift non-equivalences were observed. However, the structure of phosphoric acids has obvious influence on the recognition result. For example, BINOL derived phosphoric acid 1a was found to be the best host which afforded a baseline resolution and the largest chemical shift nonequivalence of methyl H signal of 2a (0.16 ppm), while spiro-phosphoric acid 1i with the same substituents exhibited poor chiral recognition ability; additionally, phosphoric acids with very bulky substituents such as 1b and 1j also failed to provide satisfactory discriminating results (For details, see Supplementary Materials). With optimal host 1a in hand, the effect of deuterated solvents was also studied. It was shown that the interaction between chiral phosphoric acid 1a and guest 2a existed even in protic and polar solvents (CD3OD, acetone-D6, DMSO-D6); however, CDCl3 was still found to be the best choice of solvent. To further explore the chiral recognition ability of 1a, attempts to evaluate the influence of the amount of 1a were also carried out. Generally, larger amount of 1a led to better recognition results (entries 1, 16–18). Noticeably, it was found that 20 mol% 1a was enough to give clear baseline resolution of 2a under standard analysis condition, albeit with smaller chemical shift nonequivalence (entry 16, 0.05 ppm). Finally, as the optimal compromise between discriminating result and atom economy, 1 equiv. of chiral phosphoric acid 1a was chosen in standard analysis conditions.

Table 1.

Evaluating the chiral recognition abilities of chiral phosphoric acids 1 with 2a.

graphic file with name fchem-06-00300-i0001.jpg

Open in a new tab

a All samples were prepared by mixing 1 (0.01 mmol) and the guests 2a (0.01 mmol) in CDCl3 at 25°C.

bAcetone-D6 was used as deuterated solvent.

cCD3OD was used as deuterated solvent.

dDMSO-D6 was used as deuterated solvent.

e0.2 equiv. of 1a was used.

f0.5 equiv. of 1a was used.

g1.5 equiv. of 1a was used.

The general applicability of these conditions for a variety of racemic 3-arylquinazolinones was fully demonstrated in Table 2. In the presence of 1 equiv. of phosphoric acid 1a in 0.5 mL CDCl3 at 25°C, a number of racemic 3-arylquinazolinones derivatives 2b−2m with various substituents can be well resolved. For example, other aromatic moieties such as thiophene or quinoline on 2 position of 3-arylquinazolinones can also result in good enantiodiscrimination, albeit with smaller ΔΔδ value (2b and 2c, 0.02–0.06 ppm); besides, 2-methyl substituted 3-arylquinazolinones with either electron-withdrawing group or electron-donating group on 6, 7, 8 position were proved to be good guests under optimal conditions, affording baseline resolutions with good chemical shift nonequivalence (2d−2k, 0.02-0.21 ppm). Noticeably, 3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl-6-nitroquinazolin-4(3H)-one 2e was well recognized with the largest ΔΔδ value of 0.21 ppm. Additionally, different substituents such as methyl, methoxyl or halogen group on the N-3 benzene ring were also well tolerated. However, when 2′-iodo-benzene was used as substituents on N-3 position, 1.5 equiv of 1a was found necessary to afford satisfactory result (entry 12).

Table 2.

Differentiating the enantiomers of different racemic 3-arylquinazo-linones derivatives 2 in the presence of phosphoric acid 1aa.

graphic file with name fchem-06-00300-i0002.jpg

Open in a new tab

aAll samples were prepared by mixing 1a (0.01 mmol) and the guests 2 (0.01 mmol) in CDCl3 at 25°C.

b 0.015 mmol 1a was used.

To demonstrate the practical utility of our methodology, commercial drugs (candidate) were next selected for chiral recognition with phosphoric acid 1a. To our delight, racemic 3-arylquinazolinone type bioactive molecules such as multifunctional afloqualone and IC-87114 can be well enantiodiscriminated with baseline resolutions under standard analysis conditions (Figure 2), for details, see Supplementary Materials.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

afloqualone and IC-87114 were discriminated under standard conditions.

Encouraged by these good discrimination results, this methodology was subsequently applied to the enantiomeric determination of various non-racemic 2a samples. As shown in Figure 3, the optical purities of 2a can be accurately obtained by integrating the corresponding H signals of methyl group of 2a in the presence of 1 equiv. of 1a. Compared with those data obtained from chiral HPLC analysis, excellent linear relationship and up to 1.4% absolute errors were obtained.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

1H NMR signals of non-racemic 2a samples in the presence of 1 equiv. of 1a in CDCl3 (left); linear relationship between NMR measured ee values versus the HPLC determined ee values (right).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed an efficient chiral NMR analysis method for atropisomeric quinazolinones, in which chiral phosphoric acid shows excellent abilities to discriminate the enantiomers of various 3-arylquinazolinones with good chemical shift non-equivalence. With this method, the optical purities of different non-racemic 2a can be fast evaluated with high accuracy. Further studies on the interactions of chiral phosphoric acid with other analytes are currently underway.

Author contributions

JJ and HL designed the project, guided the study, and polished the manuscript. CW and JL: conducted the experiments and characterized the samples. H-PX and XL revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21472141 and 21571144), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY18B020011) and Foundation of Zhejiang Educational Committee (Y201430852).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00300/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (3.9MB, PDF)

References

  1. Akdeniz A., Minami T., Watanabe S., Yokoyama M., Ema T. (2016). Determination of enantiomeric excess of carboxylates by fluorescent macrocyclic sensors. Chem. Sci. 7, 2016–2022. 10.1039/C5SC04235F [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akutagawa S. (1995). Asymmetric synthesis by metal BINAP catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 128, 171–207. 10.1016/0926-860X(95)00097-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bian G., Yang S., Huang H., Zong H., Song L. (2016a). A bisthiourea-based 1 H NMR chiral sensor for chiral discrimination of a variety of chiral compounds. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 231, 129–134. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bian G., Yang S., Huang H., Zong H., Song L., Fan H., et al. (2016b). Chirality sensing of tertiary alcohols by a novel strong hydrogen-bonding donor–selenourea. Chem. Sci. 7, 932–938. 10.1039/C5SC03780H [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bringmann G., Gulder T., Gulder T. A., Breuning M. (2011). Atroposelective total synthesis of axially chiral biaryl natural products. Chem. Rev. 111, 563–639. 10.1021/cr100155e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunel J. M. (2005). BINOL: a versatile chiral reagent. Chem. Rev. 105, 857–898. 10.1021/cr040079g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunel J. M. (2007). Update 1 of: BINOL: a versatile chiral reagent. Chem. Rev. 107, PR1–PR45. 10.1021/cr078004a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christie G. H., Kenner J. (1922). LXXI.—The molecular configurations of polynuclear aromatic compounds. Part I. The resolution of γ-6: 6′-dinitro- and 4:6:4′:6′-tetranitro-diphenic acids into optically active components. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 121, 614–620. 10.1039/CT9222100614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clayden J., Moran W. J., Edwards P. J., LaPlante S. R. (2009). The challenge of atropisomerism in drug discovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6398–6401. 10.1002/anie.200901719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding K., Ishii A., Mikami K. (1999). Super high throughput screening (SHTS) of chiral ligands and activators: asymmetric activation of chiral diol–zinc catalysts by chiral nitrogen activators for the enantioselective addition of diethylzinc to aldehydes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 497–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eichelbaum M., Gross A. S. (1996). Stereochemical aspects of drug action and disposition. Adv. Drug Res. 28, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ema T., Tanida D., Sakai T. (2007). Versatile and practical macrocyclic reagent with multiple hydrogen-bonding sites for chiral discrimination in NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10591–10596. 10.1021/ja073476s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frazer R. R., Petit M. A., Saunders J. K. (1971). Determination of enantiomeric purity by an optically active nuclear magnetic resonance shift reagent of wide applicability. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1450–1451. 10.1039/c29710001450 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Genet J. P., Ayad T., Ratovelomanana-Vidal V. (2014). Electron-deficient diphosphines: the impact of DIFLUORPHOS in asymmetric catalysis. Chem. Rev. 114, 2824–2880. 10.1021/cr4003243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghosh I., Zeng H., Kishi Y. (2004). Application of chiral lanthanide shift reagents for assignment of absolute configuration of alcohols. Org. Lett. 6, 4715–4718. 10.1021/ol048061f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghosn M. W., Wolf C. (2009). Chiral amplification with a stereodynamic triaryl probe: assignment of the absolute configuration and enantiomeric excess of amino alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 16360–16361. 10.1021/ja907741v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goering H. L., Eikenberry J. N., Koermer G. S. (1971). Tris[3-(trifluoromethylhydroxymethylene)-d-camphorato]europium(III). Chiral shift reagent for direct determination of enantiomeric compositions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 5913–5914. 10.1021/ja00751a065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gualandi A., Grilli S., Savoia D., Kwit M., Gawronski J. (2011). C-hexaphenyl-substituted trianglamine as a chiral solvating agent for carboxylic acids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 9, 4234–4241. 10.1039/c0ob01192d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Han S. M. (1997). Direct enantiomeric separations by high performance liquid chromatography using cyclodextrins. Biomed. Chromatogr. 11, 259–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang H., Bian G., Zong H., Wang Y., Yang S., Yue H., et al. (2016). Chiral sensor for enantiodiscrimination of varied acids. Org. Lett. 18, 2524–2527. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Iwaniuk D. P., Wolf C. (2010). A versatile and practical solvating agent for enantioselective recognition and NMR analysis of protected amines. J. Organ. Chem., 75, 6724–6727. 10.1021/jo101426a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. James T. D., Sandanayake R. A. S., Shinkai S. (1995). Chiral discrimination of monosaccharides using a fluorescent molecular sensor. Nature 374, 345–347. 10.1038/374345a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumobayashi H., Miura T., Sayo N., Saito T., Zhang X. (2001). Recent advances of BINAP chemistry in the industrial aspects. Synlett, 2001(Special Issue), 1055–1064. 10.1055/s-2001-14625 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Labuta J., Ishihara S., Šikorský T., Futera Z., Shundo A., Hanyková L., et al. (2013). NMR spectroscopic detection of chirality and enantiopurity in referenced systems without formation of diastereomers. Nat. Commun. 4:2188. 10.1038/ncomms3188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lancelot C. J., Harper J. J., von Schleyer P. R. (1969). Participation by neighboring aryl groups. II. Accurate determinations of inductive and anchimeric assistance effects by a Hammett-Taft correlation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 4294–4296. 10.1021/ja01043a051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Z. B., Lin J., Pu L. (2005). A cyclohexyl-1,2-diamine-derived bis(binaphthyl) macrocycle: enhanced sensitivity and enantioselectivity in the fluorescent recognition of mandelic acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 1690–1693. 10.1002/anie.200462471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu C. X., Zheng L., Zhu L., Xiao H. P., Li X., Jiang J. (2017). Efficient chiral 1H NMR analysis of indoloquinazoline alkaloids phaitanthrin A, cephalanthrin-A and their analogues with a chiral phosphoric acid. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15, 4314–4319. 10.1039/C7OB00823F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu H.-L., Hou X.-L., Pu L. (2009). Enantioselective precipitation and solid-state fluorescence enhancement in the recognition of α-hydroxycarboxylic acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 382–385. 10.1002/anie.200804538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lovely A. E., Wenzel T. J. (2006). Chiral NMR discrimination of secondary amines using (18-Crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid. Org. Lett. 8, 2823–2826. 10.1021/ol0609558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma Q., Ma M., Tian H., Ye X., Xiao H., Chen L., et al. (2012). A novel amine receptor based on the binol scaffold functions as a highly effective chiral shift reagent for carboxylic acids. Org. Lett. 14, 5813–5815. 10.1021/ol3027686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mei X., Wolf C. (2004). A highly congested N,N'-dioxide fluorosensor for enantioselective recognition of chiral hydrogen bond donors. Chem. Comm. 2004, 2078–2079. 10.1039/B407718K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miyashita A., Yasuda A., Takaya H., Toriumi K., Ito T., Souchi T., et al. (1980). Synthesis of 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl (BINAP), an atropisomeric chiral bis(triaryl)phosphine, and its use in the rhodium(I)-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of .alpha.-(acylamino)acrylic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 7932–7934. 10.1021/ja00547a020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moon L. S., Pal M., Kasetti Y., Bharatam P. V., Jolly R. S. (2010). Chiral solvating agents for cyanohydrins and carboxylic acids. J. Org. Chem. 75, 5487–5498. 10.1021/jo100445d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nieto S., Dragna J. M., Anslyn E. V. (2010). A facile circular dichroism protocol for rapid determination of enantiomeric excess and concentration of chiral primary amines. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 227–232. 10.1002/chem.200902650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nieto S., Lynch V. M., Anslyn E. V., Kim H., Chin J. (2008). High-throughput screening of identity, enantiomeric excess, and concentration using MLCT transitions in CD spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 9232–9233. 10.1021/ja803443j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Parker D. (1991). NMR determination of enantiomeric purity. Chem. Rev. 91, 1441–1457. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pham N. H., Wenzel T. J. (2011). Water-soluble calix[4]resorcinarene with α-methyl-l-prolinylmethyl groups as a chiral NMR solvating agent. J. Org. Chem. 76, 986–989. 10.1021/jo102197w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pirkle W. H. (1966). The nonequivalence of physical properties of enantiomers in optically active solvents. differences in nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88:1837 10.1021/ja00960a0605942993 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pu L. (2004). Fluorescence of organic molecules in chiral recognition. Chem. Rev. 104, 1687–1716. 10.1021/cr030052h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Quinn T. P., Atwood P. D., Tanski J. M., Moore T. F., Folmer-Andersen J. F. (2011). Aza-crown macrocycles as chiral solvating agents for mandelic acid derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 76, 10020–10030. 10.1021/jo2018203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reetz M. T., Becker M. H., Kühling K. M., Holzwarth A. (1998). Time-resolved IR-thermographic detection and screening of enantioselectivity in catalytic reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 2647–2650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reetz M. T., Kühling K. M., Deege A., Hinrichs H., Belder D. (2000). Super-high-throughput screening of enantioselective catalysts by using capillary array electrophoresis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 3891–3893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schurig V., Nowotny H. P. (1990). Gas chromatographic separation of enantiomers on cyclodextrin derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 29, 939–957. 10.1002/anie.199009393 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Seco J. M., Quinoa E., Riguera R. (2004). The assignment of absolute configuration by NMR. Chem. Rev. 104, 17–118. 10.1021/cr000665j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smyth J. E., Butler N. M., Keller P. A. (2015). A twist of nature–the significance of atropisomers in biological systems. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 1562–1583. 10.1039/C4NP00121D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tumambac G. E., Wolf C. (2005). Enantioselective analysis of an asymmetric reaction using a chiral fluorosensor. Org. Lett. 7, 4045–4048. 10.1021/ol0516216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wenzel T. J. (2007). Discrimination of Chiral Compounds Using NMR. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wenzel T. J., Chisholm C. D. (2011). Assignment of absolute configuration using chiral reagents and NMR spectroscopy. Chirality 23, 190–214. 10.1002/chir.20889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wenzel T. J., Wilcox J. D. (2003). Chiral reagents for the determination of enantiomeric excess and absolute configuration using NMR spectroscopy. Chirality 15, 256–270. 10.1002/chir.10190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang D., Li X. Y., Fan F., Zhang D.-W. (2005). Enantioselective recognition of carboxylates: a receptor derived from α-aminoxy acids functions as a chiral shift reagent for carboxylic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7996–7997. 10.1021/ja051072z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yeh H. J. C., Balani S. K., Yagi H., Greene R. M. E., Sharma N. D., Boyd D. R., et al. (1986). Use of chiral lanthanide shift reagents in the determination of enantiomer composition and absolute configuration of epoxides and arene oxides. J. Org. Chem. 51, 5439–5443. 10.1021/jo00376a080 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao J., Fyles T. M., James T. D. (2004). Chiral binol–bisboronic acid as fluorescence sensor for sugar acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 3461–3464. 10.1002/anie.200454033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhou Y., Ye H., You L. (2015). Reactivity-based dynamic covalent chemistry: reversible binding and chirality discrimination of monoalcohols. J. Org. Chem. 80, 2627–2633. 10.1021/jo502801g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (3.9MB, PDF)

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES