Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
letter
. 2018 May 16;33(9):1426–1428. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4480-0

The Form and Content of Cannabis Products in the United States

Stacey Steigerwald 1,, Peggy O Wong 1, Arianne Khorasani 2, Salomeh Keyhani 3,4
PMCID: PMC6109013  PMID: 29770952

INTRODUCTION

Thirty states have legalized cannabis in some form. Cannabis potency is largely estimated from cannabis seized in drug raids and state-controlled producers. Little data exists about the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content and form of products commercially available.

Recreational states have defined potency thresholds in edibles, limiting THC to 50 or 100 mg per package and 5 or 10 mg per serving depending on the state. No clear limit exists on THC in other product forms. In addition, while recreational states prohibit false marketing claims and advertising aimed at children, no data exists on how well regulations are enforced.1

We collected data on form, THC concentration, and associated marketing claims of products in dispensaries to better understand products available and marketing targeted at the public.

METHODS

We identified the top three dispensaries with the most consumer reviews as a metric of public interest, reviewing a total 65 dispensaries. Six states and DC do not allow dispensaries. We extracted data on all products available for the most reviewed dispensary in each state (8 recreational states, 15 medical states). We determined sample representativeness by comparing our data with two more randomly selected dispensaries from the original list. When no new products were identified in form or THC content, data collection was considered complete. Information on form, marketing and nutritional claims, and THC content was collected for each product. Data was summarized by medians and interquartile range of THC content.

RESULTS

We identified 2264 unique products, 710 (31.4%) in recreational states and 1546 (68.3%) in medical states (Table 1). Among those, 1294 (57%) listed THC by serving or package. In recreational states, THC content in edibles ranged from 5 to 7000 mg among packages. About 4.2% (N = 30) of packages exceeded the 100 mg limit and 4.0% (N = 28) of servings exceeded the 10 mg limit. Among all edibles, 8.1% (n = 183) were in forms potentially attractive to children (e.g., candy). In recreational states, median THC in extracts was 1000 mg in packages and 100 mg in servings, with 65.9% (N = 81) of packages exceeding 100 mg and 50.4% (N = 62) of servings exceeding 10 mg.

Table 1.

THC Levels Listed for the Cannabis Products with Reported THC Content (N = 2264)

Recreational states
Form 710 (31.4%) Product with reported THC Content Form detail examples THC mg/package THC mg/serving
Min* Q1 Med Q3 Max Min* Q1 Med Q3 Max
Edibles 228 (32.1%)

Candy

N = 69

Berry gummy

Lemon lollipop carmel hard candy

Chocolate candy bar

10 80 100 100 1000 5 10 10 10 80

Baked good

N = 33

Chocolate chip cookie

Peanut butter brownie

20 46.25 70 100 100 5 10 10 40 70
Sublingual N = 44

Capsule/pill

Lozenge

Tinctures

Spray

7 85 150 337.5 7000 1.69 5 8.38 10.5 70

Drink

N = 24

Tea

Coffee

Soda

Alcohol

Water

Syrup

5 32.5 50 100 253 5 10 10 10 50

Spread

N = 4

Butter

Jam

Peanut butter

Honey

50 54.5 56 154.5 450 5 N/A 5 N/A 5
All edibles N = 228 As above 5 57 100 100 7000 1.69 7 10 10 80
Extracts 123 (17.3%)

81

(65.9%)

Crumble

Shatter

Wax

500 500 1000 1000 1000 5 5 100 100 100
Topical 38 (5.4%)

31

(81.6%)

Lavender lotions oils

Bath salts

Body balm

4 10 20 90 100 10 20 20 20 30
Vaginal 1 (0.1%)

1

(100%)

N/A 80 N/A N/A N/A 80 20 N/A N/A N/A 20
THC% in cannabis bud packages**
Bud or flower 320 (45.1%)

261

(81.6%)

Sativa

Indica

Hybrid

Min Q1 Median Q3 Max
0.4 18 21 23.60 54
Medical states
Form 1546 (68.3%) Product with reported THC Content Form detail examples THC mg/package THC mg/serving
Min* Q1 Med Q3 Max Min* Q1 Med Q3 Max
Edibles

692

(44.8%)

Candy N = 163

(23.6%)

Berry gummy

Lemon lollipop carmel hard candy

Chocolate candy bar

2 70 150 225 1000 3.33 10 25 45 166

Baked good N = 104

(15.0%)

Chocolate chip cookie

Peanut butter brownie

1 60 100 200 1000 < 0.5 15 31 50 100

Sublingual N = 165

(23.8%)

Capsule/pill

Lozenge

Tinctures

Spray

1.6 40 120 300 3000 0.023 4 10 20.96 201.9
Drink N = 71 (10.3%)

Tea

Coffee

Soda

Alcohol

Water

Syrup

5 75 100 300 1500 0.4 8.13 10 22.4 50

Spread

N = 30 (4.3%)

Butter

Jam

Peanut butter

Honey

5 56.8 190 345 1000 1.03 15 25 45 90

Other

N = 25 (3.6%)

Gum

Nuts

Sugar cubes

4.99 40 100 125 500 3.4 5 10 11.9 40
All edibles

692

(44.8%)

As above 1 50 120 250 3000 0.023 10 19.47 37.5 201.9
Extracts 348 (22.5%) 254 (73.0%)

Crumble

Shatter

Wax

5 500 500 1000 7000 0.4 1.25 1.6 1.81 1.87
Topical 97 (6.3%)

53

(54.6%)

Lavender lotions oils

Bath Salts

Body Balm

1.1 25 75 150 1500 1.6 3.3 5 15 25
Rectal or vaginal

3

(0.2%)

3

(100%)

N/A 75 157.5 240 345 450 60 N/A N/A N/A 60
THC% in cannabis bud packages**
Bud or flower 406 (26.3%)

271

(66.7%)

Sativa

Indica

Hybrid

Min Q1 Median Q3 Max
0.2 14.13 21.34 25.65 57.66

*Some products were Cannabidiol only products with minimal THC content

**THC is reported by percentage of weight only in bud/flower products

Among all products, 473 (20.9%) claimed therapeutic efficacy, 34% (N = 160) of which were identified in recreational states. Most common was pain management (n = 332, 14.7%), anxiety (n = 188, 8.3%), insomnia (n = 188, 8.3%), depression (n = 156, 6.9%), and stress (n = 117, 5.2%). Other indications (e.g., seizures, PTSD) were less frequent (n = 28, 1.3%). Fifteen (0.7%) made nutritional claims (e.g., “vitamin E”, “gluten-free, vegan”, “omega 3”). Nine (0.4%) warned of adverse effects (e.g., dry mouth).

DISCUSSION

Most edible products adhered to THC limits. However, the regulatory vacuum constraining THC content in other products has resulted in a proliferation of cannabis with high THC concentrations. We also found over 20% of products claimed therapeutic efficacy and 1 out of 12 edibles was potentially appealing to children.

The development of new products with high THC concentrations has outpaced safety data. A pooled analysis of 79 trials examining the efficacy of cannabis for several conditions reported severe adverse events including vomiting, diarrhea, disorientation, anxiety, confusion, dyspnea, seizures, psychosis, hallucination, and paranoia.2 The median dose of THC in cannabinoid pharmaceuticals in these trials was 8 mg. High potency cannabis has also been linked to psychosis, rapid onset of paranoid delusions, and catatonia.3 These data raise concerns given the high THC content available in some recreational products.

We found 20% of products advertised therapeutic benefits. Benefits attributed to cannabis included conditions where there is limited data available or conditions that cannabis may worsen like anxiety and depression,4, 5 suggesting regulations are inadequately enforced. No regulations currently constrain product form or flavor and many edibles are in forms potentially appealing to children (e.g., candy, flavored drinks). This is of concern given the rise in pediatric poisoning with cannabis products.6

Our methods have several limitations. In absence of sales data, consumer reviews were used as a metric of dispensary interest. We also used websites to identify products and all products may not have been listed. Finally, some products did not provide THC content. While the sampling strategy had some limitations, it nonetheless provides a clear picture of products available to the public.

In conclusion, the proliferation of high THC cannabis products combined with inadequate marketing oversight may pose risks to public health. More regulatory oversight is needed.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors whose names are listed in this publication certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership; employment consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hibpshman D. Marijuana licensing updates [PowerPoint Slides]. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.oregon.gov/olcc/marijuana/Pages/default.aspx.
  • 2.Whiting PF, Wolff RF, Deshpande S, et al. Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;313(24):2456–73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Di Forti M, Marconi A, Carra E, et al. Proportion of patients in south London with first-episode psychosis attributable to use of high potency cannabis: a case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(3):233–8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hasin DS. US epidemiology of cannabis use and associated problems. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43(1):195–212. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nugent SM, Morasco BJ, O’Neil ME, Freeman M, Low A, Kondo K, et al. The effects of cannabis among adults with chronic pain and an overview of general harms: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:319–31. doi: 10.7326/M17-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang GS, et al. Unintentional pediatric exposures to Marijuana in Colorado, 2009-2015. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(9):e160971. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES