Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Aug 24;8:12742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30687-0

Impact of fetal maceration grade on risk of maternal disseminated intravascular coagulation after intrauterine fetal death – A retrospective cohort study

Dana A Muin 1,2, Helmuth Haslacher 3, Vanessa Koller 1, Herbert Kiss 1,, Anke Scharrer 4, Alex Farr 1
PMCID: PMC6109103  PMID: 30143672

Abstract

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a life-threatening event that is the endpoint of a pathologically activated cascade leading to excessive consumption of platelets culminating in bleeding. Several diseases are known to be associated with DIC, some of which may also occur during pregnancy or the puerperium. One of the potential risk factors that have been considered as a potential trigger for DIC is the retention of a highly macerated fetus after intrauterine fetal death (IUFD). However, sparse evidence exists on its clinical implication on hemostasis parameters. In this retrospective single-center study, we investigated the role of fetal maceration grades 0-III on the risk of DIC in 91 women following IUFD between gestational weeks (+days) 22 + 0 and 41 + 6 between 2003 and 2017. We calculated the Erez DIC-score after consideration of maternal platelet count (PC), prothrombin time (PT) and fibrinogen (Fib) and correlated the findings with fetal maceration grade. Mean (±SD) age of women was 32.1 ± 6.7 years. Neither maternal hemostasis parameters (PC, PT, Fib), nor the Erez score showed a statistically significant difference between maceration grades 0-III with median values of 1 for all four grades (maceration grade I: range 0 to 27; I: 0 to 51; II: 0 to 52; III: 0 to 39). We therefore conclude, that the pathophysiology of DIC in women after singleton IUFD is unrelated to the degree of fetal maceration.

Introduction

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a clinicopathological syndrome characterized by the formation of fibrin clots with concomitant consumption of platelets and coagulation factors that leads to organ failure and contributes to a high mortality if left untreated13. In pregnancy, there is a physiological increase in coagulation factors I (fibrinogen), VII, VIII, IX and X, while other plasma factors and platelets remain stable4, all serving the maintenance of the utero-placental interface with the aim of preventing life-threatening hemorrhage after delivery5. Yet, upon destruction of maternal tissue and release of collagen and tissue components from the feto-maternal complex into maternal circulation, coagulation may be activated by thromboplastin via the extrinsic pathway. This causes tissue factors to be released, building a complex with factor VII and activating factors IX and X, finally culminating in DIC. Obstetrical conditions associated with DIC include placental abruption due to a large amount of released collagen69, amniotic fluid embolism with circulating mucin cells causing rapid defibrinolysis in maternal circulation10,11, maternal septic shock with hematogenous spread of exotoxins, endotoxins and tissue damage accompanied by acidosis1216, as well as preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome due to hypercoagulation and endothelial injury. In addition, the consumption of coagulation factors can lead to massive obstetric hemorrhage, and acute fatty liver during pregnancy may cause tissue factors and anti-thrombin to enter the blood stream3,17.

Fetal maceration takes place upon intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) and is a process characterized by enzymatic autolysis of cells and degeneration of connective tissue leading to skin discoloration, desquamation with formation of bullae and eventually skin peeling, as well as edema of the outer and inner organs with turbid effusions inside the fetal body and amniotic cavity18. After a week, the skull bones loosen their conjunction and start to overlap as recognized as the “Spalding sign” on ultrasound. Retention of a dead fetus in the uterine cavity for over 8 days, reaching maceration at stage III19,20, was thought to lead to maternal DIC, a condition called “fetal demise syndrome” by Romero et al. in 198521. In fact, the role of fetal maceration as a trigger for DIC has been first proposed in 1901 by De Lee, who described “temporary hemophilia” in a woman who had developed a bleeding disorder after delivery of a severely macerated fetus22. Fifty years later, and in a series of subsequent observations of hypofibrinogenemia in women after IUFD, Weiner et al. proposed three potential mechanisms for this pathology: decreased hepatic fibrinogen production, increased fibrinolytic activity and disseminated intravascular coagulation23,24. Whilst the first pathomechanism was dismissed soon after, the latter has been proposed to be linked to the release of tissue thromboplastin from the fetoplacental unit and thus activation of the extrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade. More recent evidence shows that women after IUFD are found to have increased in-vivo thrombin generation and platelet activation when compared to healthy mothers25. Furthermore, their amniotic fluid contains higher levels of tissue factor concentrations indicating higher thrombin generation.

Despite anecdotal case-reports on establishment of DIC in women during or after prolonged retention of a dead fetus, there is a lack of evidence to verify this association. We therefore designed this retrospective cohort study to prove the hypothesis, whether higher grades of fetal maceration, as denominator for prolonged fetal retention, elicit hematological changes in the maternal system and therewith increase the risk of DIC in this population after IUFD. We calculated the Erez score26 in all eligible women from our institution between 2003 and 2017 and correlated these results with the fetal maceration grades 0 to III, as obtained from the pathology reports following fetal post-mortem autopsy.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 91 women were included in this study whose baseline and fetal characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean (±SD) maternal age at time of delivery was 32.1 ± 6.7 years; 44 (48.4%) women were Caucasian, 20 (22.0%) were Eastern European, 15 (16.5%) were Turkish, 3 (3.3%) were African, Iranian or Middle Eastern origin, respectively, 2 (2.2%) women were Indian and 1 (1.1%) was US-American; 19 (20.9%) women were smokers and 1 (1.1%) reported alcohol consumption during pregnancy. No illicit drug consumption was reported in this cohort.

Table 1.

Maternal and fetal baseline characteristics.

Variable Number of subjects Range Median Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error of Mean
Minimum Maximum
Maternal Characteristics Age (years) 91 18 45 32 32 6.7 0.7
BMI (kg/m2) 71 19 43 26 26 5.2 0.62
Gravida 91 1 11 2 2.5 1.9 0.2
Para 91 0 9 1 1.2 1.5 0.16
Previous pregnancies (n) 91 0 10 1 1.5 1.9 0.2
Previous live births (n) 91 0 9 1 1.1 1.5 0.15
Previous stillbirths (n) 91 0 2 0 0.088 0.32 0.034
Previous miscarriages (n) 91 0 3 0 0.23 0.56 0.059
Previous terminations (n) 91 0 2 0 0.077 0.34 0.036
Gestational weeks 91 22 41 30 31 6.1 0.63
Gestational days 91 0 6 3 2.9 1.9 0.2
Blood loss (ml) 89 30 1500 200 257 250 27
Fetal Characteristics Total Weight (g) 91 104 4450 971 1456 1057 111
Length (cm) 20 55 37 39 9.2 0.98
Head circumference (cm) 22 36 32 30 4.3 0.75
Male Weight (g) 48 104 4450 794 1438 1142 165
Length (cm) 20 55 36 38 9.82 1.45
Head circumference (cm) 22 36 33 31 4.71 1.05
Female Weight (g) 43 237.0 3800.0 1300.0 1477.0 965.0 147
Length (cm) 22.0 55.0 40.0 39.0 8.68 1.32
Head circumference (cm) 22.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 3.53 0.98

The diagnosis of IUFD in 48 (52.7%) male and 43 (47.3%) female fetuses was made between 22 + 0 and 41 + 6 gestational weeks at a mean of 31 + 3 ± 6 + 2 weeks. Causes of IUFD according to the Tulip classification were congenital fetal malformations in 15 (16.5%) cases, placental pathologies in 38 (41.8%) cases, cord pathologies in 11 (12.1%) cases, infection in 8 (8.8%) cases and maternal or fetal disease in 7 (7.7%) cases. Causes of IUFD were unknown despite thorough investigation in 11 (12.1%) cases and unknown due to missing information in 1 (1.1%) case.

The mode of delivery was per vaginam from cephalic presentation in 76 (83.5%) cases and from breech position in 4 (4.4%) cases. Instrumental delivery was performed in 2 (2.2%) cases and caesarean section was carried out 9 (9.9%) times. A total of 50 (54.9%) women required no analgesia during labor, whereas 28 (30.8%) received epidural anesthesia, while 6 (6.6%) were delivered under spinal and general anesthesia, respectively. 1 (1.1%) woman requested oral analgesia only.

As per autopsy report, 13 (14.3%) fetuses had a maceration grade of 0, 13 (14.3%) had a maceration grade of I, 31 (34.1%) had a maceration grade of II and 34 (37.4%) fetuses were found to have a maceration grade of III. No significant difference between fetal sex and maceration grade was observed (p = 0.99).

Blood loss and disseminated intravascular coagulation

In the study cohort, mean blood loss was 257 ± 250 ml. Minor PPH occurred in 4 (4.4%) women with a mean blood loss of 825.0 ± 50 ml. Major PPH occurred in 3 (3.3%) women with a mean blood loss of 1166.7 ± 288.7 ml.

With regards to the assessment of DIC, an Erez score ≥26 was noted in 6 (6.6%) women ranging from 26 to 52 points, with a mean of 36.8 ± 12.4 (s. Supplementary Table 1).

In women with a positive Erez score, mean PC was 68.2 ± 30.0 G/L, mean PT was 3.4 ± 8.1 sec and mean Fib was 2.2 ± 0.7 g/dl, resulting in a median blood loss of 500 ml (150 to 1000 ml) at the time of delivery or during the early postpartum period. In women with a negative Erez score, mean PC was 227.8 ± 63.1 G/L, mean PT was −4.5 ± 1.3 sec and mean Fib was 5.0 ± 1.1 g/dl, yielding a statistically significant less mean blood loss of 244.4 ± 240.6 ml (p = 0.01).

Influence of fetal maceration grade on hemostasis

Maternal hemostasis parameters (PC, PT, Fib) showed no statistically significant correlation with fetal maceration grades 0-III (n = 91; PC p = 0.16; r2 = 0.06; PT p = 0.47; r2 = 0.03; Fib p = 0.96; r2 = 0.04; s. Figs 13).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Measurement of prothrombin time (in percentages) shows no significant correlation with fetal maceration grades 0-III as assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test (n = 91; p = 0.47; r2 = 0.03). One outlier (PT 25%) was excluded from the group with maceration grade I for graphic purpose, yet not from statistical analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Measurement of platelet count (in G/L) shows no significant correlation with fetal maceration grades 0-III as assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric distribution (n = 91; p = 0.16; r2 = 0.06).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Measurement of fibrinogen (in g/dl) shows no correlation with fetal maceration grades 0-III as assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test (n = 91; p = 0.96; r2 = 0.04).

Women whose fetus showed a maceration grade of 0 had a mean PC of 200 ± 74.7 G/L, mean PT of 128.2 ± 23.14% and mean Fib of 4.8 ± 1.5 g/dl. Women whose fetus showed a maceration grade of I had a mean PC of 192 ± 83.7 G/L, mean PT of 125.6 ± 34.86% and mean Fib of 4.9 ± 1.4 g/dl. Women with a grade II macerated fetus had a mean PC of 212 ± 69.1 G/L, mean PT of 132.1 ± 23.35% and mean Fib of 4.7 ± 1.2 g/dl. Women with a grade III macerated fetus had a mean PC of 238 ± 69.5 G/L, mean PT of 122.7 ± 19.81% and mean Fib of 4.9 ± 1.3 g/dl. Overall, there was no significant difference in the total numerical Erez calculation among all maceration grades (p = 0.68; r2 = 0.02; s. Fig. 4): In detail, the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of all four maceration grades showed a median value of 1 for maceration grade 0 (range 0–27), maceration grade I (range 0–51), maceration grade II (range 0–52) and maceration grade III (range 0–39). Likewise, the categorization of the Erez sum into a “positive” (≥26 points) versus “negative” (≤25 points) score showed no statistically significant difference between fetal maceration grades 0-III (p = 0.18; s. Fig. 5). No statistically significant difference was found in hemostasis parameters with regards to cause of fetal death in-between groups (PC p = 0.34; PT p = 0.65; Fib p = 0.47).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Calculation of the Erez score (as the total sum of PC, PT and Fib) shows no significant difference among fetal maceration grades 0-III as assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test (n = 91; p = 0.68; r2 = 0.02).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Relationship between Erez score (positive ≥ 26 points; negative ≤ 25 points) and fetal maceration grade 0-III shows no significant correlation by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.18).

Discussion

In this study our aim was to explore the impact of fetal maceration grade on the risk of maternal coagulopathy after singleton IUFD, as expressed by pathophysiological changes in biochemical markers and the clinical picture of the patient. We therefore retrieved the hemostasis parameters of all eligible subjects from the last 15 years at our department, calculated their Erez score and correlated the test results with the reported maceration grade of the intrauterine demised fetus. Our main finding was that there is no correlation between fetal maceration grade 0 to III and risk of DIC in women after singleton IUFD. This finding rejects the common hypothesis that there is a clinical correlation between a retained fetal corpse and a higher prevalence of consumptive coagulopathy in pregnant women grounded on the paradigm that fetal tissue factors released into maternal blood stream trigger the activation of consumptive processes25.

Despite the fact that several medical textbooks still refer to the “fetal demise syndrome” or “dead fetus syndrome”3,17,18, there is only a paucity of data to support this, thus being dismissed by some authors2729. After all, the presence of a “vanishing twin”, which refers to the disappearance of one sac or embryo from a primary twin pregnancy during the first trimester, due to either chromosomal abnormalities and placental dysfunction30, may occur in 10.4% to 24% of pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques31,32. Following the justification that early embryonic loss in a twin pregnancy might still be related with a release of tissue factors to guide the autolytic process of the fetus, one might assume that women after early fetal loss are prone to laboratory changes as described by Erez et al.25. However, the vanishing of a deceased twin might conclude well before the maceration process takes place. Indeed, to date, no figures have been published on the incidence of coagulopathy in women following vanishing twin syndrome33. On the contrary, maceration, or even mummification in terms of a “fetus papyraceus” are a common feature in cases where selective fetal reduction (feticide) had been performed based upon the prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal malformations affecting one of the multiples, or following higher order multiple pregnancies after assisted reproduction34. Contrasting many retrospective cohort studies on the prevalence of maternal coagulopathy within the frame of the “fetal demise syndrome” following selective termination in a twin pregnancy3537, only one case-report has been published so far on a 23-year-old woman who had developed DIC following selective termination of one twin for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 20 + 4 gestational weeks; her coagulation parameters resolved postpartum38.

In the United States, DIC accounts for up to 25% of maternal deaths39 and increased by 83% during the postpartum hospitalization between 1998 and 200940. Although the most common obstetrical cause for DIC in pregnant women is considered massive obstetric hemorrhage4143, the most common cause for DIC in pregnant women suffering IUFD is acute extensive placental abruption with an incidence of 0.5% to 1%3,44. In total, placental abruption accounted for 1.1% of direct maternal perinatal mortality in the United States between 2006 and 201039. Common features of a non-concealed acute placental abruption are vaginal bleeding, severe abdominal pain, uterine tenderness or tetanic contractions45. The acute separation of the implanted placenta from the decidua causes large amounts of decidual and trophoblast-derived tissue factors to enter the maternal circulation and activate profound coagulation46. Rapid treatment of the underlying disorder is considered the cornerstone of DIC management47. While the release of fetal tissue factors during maceration may well be associated with a local reaction of the surrounding environment, it is plausible to assume that intact amniotic membranes and the constriction of spiral arteries act as a natural barrier and inhibit further feto-maternal shift of endotoxins. This may prevent the crossing over of potential mediators for systemic inflammation or DIC and natural waste products after IUFD.

The strengths of this study are, firstly, its strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a homogenous cohort limited to singleton IUFDs and devoid of any obvious maternal or fetal risk factors for DIC, apart from the fetal maceration grade, which was subject to our hypothesis. Secondly, we applied the Erez score instead of the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) scoring system for DIC47, since evaluation of D-Dimer has not been routinely assessed in this cohort due to its poor positive predictive value in pregnancy48,49. The Erez score, however, puts emphasis on the PC count, and thrombocytopenia has been appreciated as one of the commonest diagnostic features for DIC50. Last but not least, the single-center setting of this study ascertained a continuous degree of quality in laboratory assessment and reporting of autopsy examinations, restricting the influence of bias and heterogeneity in reporting across centers. Despite these strengths, we acknowledge certain study limitations. Due to its retrospective study design, we were unable to control for accuracy in documentation of medical co-morbidities, pre-existing coagulopathies and concomitant anticoagulation therapy, as this was self-reported by the pregnant woman and therefore subject to recall bias at time of antenatal booking. Furthermore, inherent to its study setting, the total number of our population was relatively small, especially for women who experienced DIC without other common risk factors, as outlined in the methods section. Whilst in our database 37.4% of fetuses were diagnosed with a maceration grade of III (≥8 days), the exact percentage of women whose baby had died more than 28 days ago, is unclear. The longer the fetus remains dead in utero, however, the higher the likelihood of developing DIC, as described in previous studies51,52. Owing to the tight antenatal follow-up regime at our institution, however, the majority of IUFD would have been timely recognized within at least 6 weeks of the last viability check. Furthermore, we acknowledge the fact that DIC is a dynamic process and that women might have still developed DIC upon their discharge from hospital, which we have not taken into account in this study due to lacking follow-up data. These limitations should prompt further validation of our findings in larger prospective multi-center cohort studies as well as future research on the exact pathophysiology of DIC and its timeline after fetal death.

In conclusion, our study shows that the occurrence of DIC in women after singleton IUFD is independent of the fetal maceration grade. We herewith support the clinical value of the Erez score in identifying women at risk of DIC, independent of the precipitating factor. Of note, our work is of theoretical value, challenging a hypothesis that has been established over a century ago, and which has only been backed up by a sparse body of evidence.

Methods

Study design and data collection

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on women having delivered a stillborn fetus between February 2003 and February 2017 at the Department of Obstetrics and Fetomaternal Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. We retrieved all delivery entries from the local obstetrical database ViewPoint® (Version 5.6.16.917; General Electric Company, Wessling; Germany) using the criteria (a) singleton pregnancy, (b) Apgar score of 0 at 1, 5 and 10 minutes, (c) ticked check-box for “stillbirth”. All collected data were manually reviewed for accuracy and compliance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were singleton IUFD above gestational week 22 + 0, documentation of the fetal maceration grade following conventional post-mortem autopsy and availability of maternal coagulation parameters (platelet count, prothrombin time and fibrinogen) at the time of IUFD-diagnosis and/or upon hospital-admission and up to 2 days after delivery. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, IUFD following selective embryo reduction, medical or surgical terminations of pregnancies, perinatal fetal deaths and all independent risk-factors that are known to cause DIC in pregnant women, including acute postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony, trauma or retained tissue; placental abruption; severe preeclampsia; HELLP; maternal sepsis or intra-amniotic infection; acute fatty liver and amniotic fluid embolism. Following those search criteria, we retrieved a total of 612 cases from the ViewPoint® database, which we further limited to 193 cases after considering the above inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among those, 75 women had missing blood tests and 27 fetuses had not undergone post-mortem autopsy. Hence, our final study-cohort constituted of 91 eligible cases (s. Supplementary Fig. 1).

Definitions

Maternal age was defined as age in years at the time of delivery; gravidity was defined as the number of the current pregnancy; parity was defined as the number of previous deliveries. Ethnicity, nicotine, alcohol and illicit drug consumption were self-reported by the woman at the time of antenatal booking. Body mass index (BMI) at booking was grouped as obese (≥30 kg/m2), overweight (25–29 kg/m2), normal (19–24.9 kg/m2) and underweight (<18.9 kg/m2). Cause of death was defined as the “initial, demonstrable pathophysiological entity initiating the chain of events that has irreversibly led to death” and was categorized according to the Tulip classification upon collection of all relevant maternal, fetal, obstetrical and post-mortem information53.

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) was differentiated into minor PPH as blood loss between 500–1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery and major PPH defined as blood loss exceeding 1000 ml54. DIC was diagnosed based upon abnormal global hemostatic tests, as reflected by an Erez score ≥26, up to five days after delivery, presence of minor to major PPH and/or critical signs of beginning or fulminant organ failure. Women with DIC were assigned an ICD-10 code [D65-D69] in their medical records.

Maceration grade

All fetal autopsies were conducted by an expert team of three perinatal pathologists according to standardized guidelines at the Clinical Institute for Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Maceration grading was based upon external fetal features and allowed estimation of time relapsed since intrauterine death. Maceration grade 0 referred to “parboiled” skin discoloration (<8 hours of death); maceration grade I described not specified desquamation of the skin (≥8 hours); maceration grade II was assigned to fetuses with blood stained effusions in serous cavities and skin peeling (2–7 days), and maceration grade III corresponded with the appearance of a yellow-brown liver, turbid effusions and mummification (≥8 days)20. Fetal autopsy reports were derived from the local electronic hospital database. Reports with missing data were excluded.

Placenta histology

Placental histology was carried out by placental histopathologists at the Clinical Institute for Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Placental lesions were reported according to local guidelines based upon the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement55. Placental lesions were then classified into nine categories as per Turowski et al. (1. Normal placenta according to gestational age; 2. Chorioamnionitis; 3. Villitis and intervillositis; 4. Maternal circulatory disorders (decidual vasculopathy); 5. Fetal circulatory disorders; 6. Delayed villous maturation; 7. Suggestive for genetic aberration; 8. Implantation disorders; 9. Other lesions)56.

DIC - Scoring system

The Erez score is a pregnancy-adapted scoring system to early identify women at risk for DIC26. In contrast to the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) scoring system for DIC47, the Erez score is omitting the consideration of fibrin degradation products (D-Dimer) which can yield a false-positive result in pregnancy. Instead, it is the sum of the platelet count (PC), prothrombin time (PT; a ratio between the patient’s value and the inferior reference value, both given in seconds) and fibrinogen (Fib): [PC > 185 × 109/l = 0 OR PC (100 × 109/l) − (185 × 109/l) = 1 OR PC (50 × 109/l) − (100 × 109/l) = 2 OR PC < 50 × 109/l = 1] + [PT < 0.5 = 0 OR PT 0.5–1 = 5 OR PT 1.0–1.5 = 12 OR PT > 1.5 = 25] + [Fib 3.0 g/l = 25 OR Fib 3.0–4.0 g/l = 6 OR Fib 4.0–4.5 g/l = 1 OR Fib > 4.5 g/l = 0]. An Erez score of ≥26 suggests high probability for DIC.

Laboratory testing

Biochemical analysis was conducted at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria (ISO9001-certification; ISO15189-accreditation). Platelet count (PC) was quantified on Sysmex hematology analyzers (Sysmex Europe GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT) and fibrinogen according to Clauss was measured on STA-R analyzers with CE-certified assays (Diagnostica Stago, Asniéres, France). Prothrombin times (PT) were assessed according to Owren (until 2015-08-18 Normotest® CE [Technoclone GmbH, Vienna, Austria]; thereupon Hepato-Prest CE [Diagnostica Stago]) on STA-R analyzers (Diagnostica Stago). For calculations, results below the limit of detection (LOD) were estimated by their assumed expected value: x¯=0+LOD2 and values above the highest point of the standard curve (HQS) were fixed at: xh=HQS+1. At our institution, normal ranges for PC are 150–350 G/L, for PT 75–140% and for Fib 2.0–4.0 g/dl.

Maternal laboratory test results were extracted from the Laboratory Information and Management System MOLIS (vision4health, Bochum, Germany) at the Department of Laboratory Medicine. As DIC is known to be a dynamic process, we retrieved the lab reports for each subject at different stages throughout the treatment period, namely at the date of IUFD-diagnosis, date of hospital admission and up to 5 days after delivery. In case of dynamic changes in lab results, the poorest values have been evaluated in this study for each parameter. Variables were checked and validated for completeness and accuracy by the study investigators.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data is presented as mean (±standard deviation, SD), if normally-distributed, otherwise as median (range). Categorical data is given as counts and percentages. Relationships between continuous variables were assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation tests. Differences in continuous physiological parameters and laboratory results were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and ANOVA, respectively. All reported p-values are two-sided, and a Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p-value was considered as level of significance (p < 0.05). Statistical tests were performed with SPSS® version 22.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism® 7.0c (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Figures were compiled by GraphPad Prism® 7.0c.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1231/2017) and complied with the principles outlined in the declaration of Helsinki. Patients’ written consent was not required as per Austrian Federal Act concerning Protection of Personal Data (DSG 2000).

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information (277.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Thomas Schickbauer, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Vienna, for his precious cooperation in conducting this study, Professor Alexander Heazell, Tommy’s Stillbirth Research Center, Manchester, for his valuable comments on the initial study design and manuscript, and Professor DDr. Johannes Huber for his enduring support.

Author Contributions

D.A.M. conceived the study idea and wrote the first draft of this paper. D.A.M., H.H., V.K., H.K. and A.F. contributed equally in design and conduction. V.K., D.A.M. and H.H. acquired the data, A.S. and A.F. checked data for validity. D.A.M., H.H. and A.F. carried out the statistical analysis. D.A.M., H.H. and A.F. interpreted the data. All authors contributed to critically revising the paper for important intellectual content and approved the final version to be published. All authors accept responsibility for the article as published.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-30687-0.

References

  • 1.Sohn, C. H. et al. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Emergency Department Patients with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage. Shock, 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000852 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Erez O, Mastrolia SA, Thachil J. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pregnancy: insights in pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cunningham FG, Nelson DB. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Syndromes in Obstetrics. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;126:999–1011. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bowen ME. Williams Obstetrics on abortion. Man and medicine. 1979;4:205–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerbasi FR, Bottoms S, Farag A, Mammen E. Increased intravascular coagulation associated with pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1990;75:385–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Monteiro AA, Inocencio AC, Jorge CS. ‘Placental abruption’ with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in the second trimester of pregnancy with fetal survival. Case report. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1987;94:811–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Olah KS, Gee H, Needham PG. The management of severe disseminated intravascular coagulopathy complicating placental abruption in the second trimester of pregnancy. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1988;95:419–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mechem CC, Knopp RK, Feldman D. Painless abruptio placentae associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation and syncope. Annals of emergency medicine. 1992;21:883–885. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seckin NC, Inegol I, Turhan NO, Bavbek N, Kosar A. A life-threatening second trimester disseminated intravascular coagulopathy with protein s deficiency. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis: official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2004;10:289–291. doi: 10.1177/107602960401000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu S, et al. Procoagulant activity and cellular origin of microparticles in human amniotic fluid. Thrombosis research. 2014;133:645–651. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hell, L. et al. Procoagulant extracellular vesicles in amniotic fluid. Translational research: the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 10.1016/j.trsl.2017.01.003 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Kim KH, et al. A case of septic shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation complicated by acute myocardial infarction following amniocentesis. The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2005;20:325–329. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2005.20.4.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Romero R, Kadar N, Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS. Maternal death following cardiopulmonary collapse after delivery: amniotic fluid embolism or septic shock due to intrauterine infection? American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y.: 1989) 2010;64:113–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00823.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thomson AJ, Greer IA. Non-haemorrhagic obstetric shock. Bailliere’s best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2000;14:19–41. doi: 10.1053/beog.1999.0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnson JR, Stubblefield PG, Hamid MA, Kasznica J. Septic shock, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy following midtrimester genetic amniocentesis. Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology. 1997;5:386–390. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Snyder CC, Barton JR, Habli M, Sibai BM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy: indications for delivery and maternal and perinatal outcomes. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2013;26:503–506. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.739221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pritchard JA, Cunningham FG, Mason RA. Coagulation changes in eclampsia: their frequency and pathogenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;124:855–864. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)33390-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yee Khong, T. R. D. G. M. Keeling’s Fetal and Neonatal Pathology. Fifth edn, 687–689 (Springer, 2015).
  • 19.Gold KJ, Abdul-Mumin AR, Boggs ME, Opare-Addo HS, Lieberman RW. Assessment of “fresh” versus “macerated” as accurate markers of time since intrauterine fetal demise in low-income countries. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2014;125:223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Langley FA. The perinatal postmortem examination. Journal of clinical pathology. 1971;24:159–169. doi: 10.1136/jcp.24.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Romero R, Copel JA, Hobbins JC. Intrauterine fetal demise and hemostatic failure: the fetal death syndrome. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 1985;28:24–31. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198528010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.DeLee, J. A case of fatal hemorrhagic diathesis, with premature detachment of the placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol44 (1901).
  • 23.Weiner AE, Reid DE, Roby CC, Diamond LK. Coagulation defects with intrauterine death from Rh isosensitization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;60:1015–1022. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(50)90507-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reid DE, Weiner AE, Roby CC, Diamond LK. Maternal afibrinogenemia associated with long-standing intrauterine fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1953;66:500–506. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(53)90067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Erez O, et al. Evidence of maternal platelet activation, excessive thrombin generation, and high amniotic fluid tissue factor immunoreactivity and functional activity in patients with fetal death. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2009;22:672–687. doi: 10.1080/14767050902853117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Erez O, et al. DIC score in pregnant women–a population based modification of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis score. PloS one. 2014;9:e93240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carlson NJ, Towers CV. Multiple gestation complicated by the death of one fetus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1989;73:685–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fusi L, Gordon H. Twin pregnancy complicated by single intrauterine death. Problems and outcome with conservative management. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1990;97:511–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gonen R, Heyman E, Asztalos E, Milligan JE. The outcome of triplet gestations complicated by fetal death. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1990;75:175–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levi S. Ultrasonic assessment of the high rate of human multiple pregnancy in the first trimester. Journal of clinical ultrasound: JCU. 1976;4:3–5. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870040104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.La Sala GB, et al. Effect of the mode of assisted reproductive technology conception on obstetric outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2006;86:247–249. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Andersen AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 2005;20:2821–2829. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sun L, Jiang LX, Chen HZ. Obstetric outcome of vanishing twins syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017;295:559–567. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4289-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Evans MI, et al. Efficacy of second-trimester selective termination for fetal abnormalities: international collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:90–94. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wapner RJ, et al. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet (London, England) 1990;335:90–93. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90550-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berkowitz RL, Stone JL, Eddleman KA. One hundred consecutive cases of selective termination of an abnormal fetus in a multifetal gestation. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1997;90:606–610. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Evans MI, et al. Selective termination for structural, chromosomal, and mendelian anomalies: international experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:893–897. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70321-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hackney DN, Williams M, Landon MB, Samuels P, O’Shaughnessy RW. Disseminated intravascular coagulation following selective termination in a twin pregnancy. A case report. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2006;21:228–231. doi: 10.1159/000089308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Creanga AA, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? Journal of women’s health. 2014;23:3–9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120:1029–1036. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826d60c5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rattray DD, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Acute disseminated intravascular coagulation in obstetrics: a tertiary centre population review (1980 to 2009) Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC. 2012;34:341–347. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35214-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levi M, Ten Cate H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;341:586–592. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Erez O. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pregnancy - Clinical phenotypes and diagnostic scores. Thrombosis research. 2017;151(Suppl 1):S56–S60. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(17)30069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ananth CV, Berkowitz GS, Savitz DA, Lapinski RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. Jama. 1999;282:1646–1651. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.17.1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ananth CV, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:272 e271–272 e279. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuczynski J, Uszynski W, Zekanowska E, Soszka T, Uszynski M. Tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) in the placenta and myometrium. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2002;105:15–19. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00113-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, Watson HG. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. British journal of haematology. 2009;145:24–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grossman KB, et al. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics affect plasma fibrin monomer complexes and D-dimer reference ranges for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:466 e461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Linnemann B, et al. iagnosis of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism - position paper of the Working Group in Women’s Health of the Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (GTH) VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. 2016;45:87–101. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Levi M, Meijers JC. DIC: which laboratory tests are most useful. Blood reviews. 2011;25:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pritchard JA. Fetal death in utero. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1959;14:573–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pritchard, J. A. Haematological problems associated with delivery, placental abruption, retained dead fetus and amniotic fluid embolism. Clin Haematol2 (1973).
  • 53.Korteweg FJ, et al. The Tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2006;113:393–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mavrides EAS, et al. Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage: Green-top Guideline No. 52. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2017;124:e106–e149. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khong TY, et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2016;140:698–713. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Turowski G, Berge LN, Helgadottir LB, Jacobsen EM, Roald B. A new, clinically oriented, unifying and simple placental classification system. Placenta. 2012;33:1026–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (277.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES