Skip to main content
BMC Anesthesiology logoLink to BMC Anesthesiology
. 2018 Aug 25;18:118. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0581-x

Inhospital outcome of elderly patients in an intensive care unit in a Sub-Saharan hospital

M Lankoandé 1,, P Bonkoungou 2, A Simporé 2, G Somda 3, R A F Kabore 4
PMCID: PMC6109456  PMID: 30144794

Abstract

Background

In Burkina Faso, demographics are changing and we are seeing a growing prevalence of older patients in intensive care units. Elderly people have increased health care needs but there is a lack of geriatric specialists. This study aimed to analyze in-hospital outcome of patients aged over 65 years, admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at Yalgado Hospital.

Methods

We carried out a 5-year retrospective study in the ICU of Yalgado Ouédraogo Hospital. Elderly patients with completed records were included. Baseline characteristics, clinical and outcome were analyzed.

Results

Two thousand one hundred sixteen patients were admitted to ICU, 237 (11.2%) of whom were included. There were 70 females and 167 males. The median age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years. The overall mortality rate in ICU was 73%, of whom 90% died within 7 days after admission. In multivariate analysis, shock (Odds Ratio: OR = 2.2, p = 0.002), severe brain trauma (OR; 9.6, p = 0.002), coma (OR 5.8 p < 0.003), surgical condition (OR = 4.2, p = 0.003), ASAPS Score ≥ 8 (OR = 4.3, p = 0.001), complication occurring (OR = 5.2, p = 0.001) and stroke (OR = 3.7, p = 0.001) were independent factors.

Conclusion

Elderly patients were frequent in ICU and their mortality rate was high. Stroke, severe brain trauma, surgery, complications occurring during hospitalization were independent risk factors of death.

Keywords: Elderly, Intensive care unit, Mortality

Background

Elderly is defined as a chronological age equal to or above 65 years worldwide or above 60 years in Africa [1]. Worldwide, the elderly population continues to grow due to increased life expectancy [2]. In 2015, the world elderly population rose by 55 million and the proportion reached 8.5% [3]. In Africa, the proportion of elderly accounted for 6.6% in 2015 and will reach 9.6% in 2050. This increase is also seen in Burkina Faso. In 1985, the census in Burkina Faso reported 319,496 elderly people accounting for 4% of the general population. [4] This rose to 475,812 (2.4%) in 2016 [5]. Despite the increase of the number of elderly people in Burkina Faso, their proportion is reduced by the explosion of births and the youth of the population. One of the consequences of the growth in the number of elderly patients is the increased requirement for admission to ICU. They require appropriate healthcare facilities, and special skills and human resources. They have higher morbidity and mortality because of associated co-morbidities. In developing countries, intensive care is limited by poverty, lack of equipment, inadequate skills and insufficient human resources. This study aims to assess outcomes for elderly patients admitted to ICU in the first referral teaching hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo in Burkina Faso.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective study of elderly patients admitted to the ICU of the tertiary Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo over a five-year period (1st January, 2011 to 31st December, 2015). Yalgado Hospital is a tertiary care, governmental hospital, with an overall capacity of 800 beds and an 8 bed ICU where patients are managed by anesthesiologists. The average number of admissions to ICU was about 200 patients per year with a mortality of 51.6% [6]. The ICU is poorly equipped (one transport ventilator, one defibrillator and monitors). Patients receive fluid and electrolyte management, transfusions, oxygen, vasoactive drugs, and nutrition (parenteral and oral nutrition). Non-invasive ventilation and CPAP were not used. Relevant data recorded includes socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, diagnosis, indications for ICU admission, Glasgow Coma Score at admission, the Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (ASAPS) [7], Charlson co-morbidity score, need for mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion and or hemodialysis, sepsis, shock on admission, length of stay and outcome. The Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score is a scale used for patients admitted to ICU to evaluate the severity of their condition.

Ethical and National Scientific Research and Technology Center (ENSRTC) approved the study. The Epidemiologic Information package version 7.1.5.0 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics included frequency for nominal variables and mean ± standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables according to their distribution. Independent t-test (continuous variables) and Chi-square test (categorical variables) were used in univariate analysis when comparing age groups, survivors to non-survival patients. A p value 0.05 was considered as significant. The total sample was divided into three groups according to age (65–74 years or « young old », 75–84 years or old old, and > 85 years or oldest old).

Results

In total, 2116 patients were admitted to ICU of whom 237 (11.2%) were included in our study. The mean age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years, with male: female ratio of 2.3. The demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of patients (n = 237)

Characteristic Mean Number Percentages
Age (years) 71.7 ± 6.1
 65–74 years 167 70.5
 75–84 years 58 24.5
 Over 84 years 12 5
Gender
 Male 167 70.5
 Female 70 29.5
Residency
 Urban 159 67.1
 Rural area 78 32.9
Profession
 Retired 48 32.6
 Housewife 37 25.2
 Farmer 31 21.1
 Public/Private service 31 21.1
Referral facilities
 District hospital 107 45.1
 Regional hospital 39 16.4
 Dispensary 3 1.3
 Teaching hospital 19 8
 Private Hospital 69 29.1

Teaching Hospital (YO: 8 cases; Blaise Compaore Hospital: 6 cases; Sourou Sanou Hospital = 5 cases);

Comorbidity was identified in 191 cases (80.6%) of which 49.4% (n = 117) had more than 2 comorbidities and 19.4% (n = 46) had none. The Charlson median score was 4.8. A score ≥ 4 was recorded in 89.4% at admission in ICU. Past histories of hypertension (50.6%), diabetes (23.6%) and peptic ulcers (6.3%) were common. The clinical features are summarized in Table 2. 42.1% of patients were comatose, with Glasgow coma score < 8. 100 (49.02%) patients had ASAPS score ≥ 8.

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients (n = 237)

Clinical characteristics Mean Number Percentage
Reasons of admission (n = 237)
 ACSa 133 56.1
 Shock 78 32.9
 Thermal burns 11 4.6
 ARDSb 9 3.8
 Poor condition 6 2.5
Glasgow coma score (n = 214) 9.6 ± 4.0
 < 8 90 42.1
 8–14 78 36.4
 15 46 21.5
Blood Pressure (n = 237)
 Systolic Pressure 132.5 ± 36.6
 Diastolic pressure 78.1 ± 23.5
 Hypertension 124 52.3
 Hypotension 35 14.7
Temperature (n = 237) 111 46.8
 Hyperthermia
 Hypothermia 9 3.8
ASAPS (n = 204) 7.9 ± 3.5

ASAPS Ambulatory simplified acute physiologic score

aACS Alteration of consciousness

bARD Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Medical conditions (60%), particularly of the Central Nervous System (CNS) (37.97%), were the most common. Among all diseases, stroke was most frequent (27.4%) followed by peritonitis. Care was based on fluid and electrolyte management, pain relief, and supply of oxygen. Only 2 patients were mechanically ventilated. During hospitalization, complications occurred in 89 patients (37.55%) of which acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was the main one (10.55%). In total 173 (73%) patients died in ICU. Table 3 summarizes the diagnoses and in-hospital outcome of patients.

Table 3.

Diagnosis and outcome of patients (n = 237)

Clinical data Number Percentage
Admission condition
 Medical condition 183 77.2
 Surgical condition 54 22.8
Diseases
 Stroke 65 27.4
 Prostate tumor 27 11.4
 Sepsis 26 10.9
 Trauma/Burn 25 10.5
 Bowel obstruction 13 5.5
 Heart disease 18 2.5
 Diabetes Acute metabolic complications 20 8.4
 Kidney failure 16 6.7
 Othera 27 11.4
 Total 237 100
Complications
 Sepsis 25 10.5
 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 38 42.7
 Shock 15 6.3
 Coma 19 21.3
 Bed sores 8 3.4
 Acute pulmonary edema 5 2.1
 Pulmonary aspiration 5 2.1
 Pulmonary embolism 1 0.4
 Otherb 5 2.1
Outcomes
 Death in ICU 173 73
 Transfer to other ward 48 20.2
 Hospital discharge with physician authorization 10 4.2
 Discharge without physician authorization 6 2.5
 Total 237 100

aOther: anemia (n = 3), dehydratation (n = 2)

bHernia, blood disorder, ulcer, hydronephrosis, asthma, skin disease, leukemia

The mean length of ICU stay was 5.3 ± 7.4 days [IC 95%; 1–58]. Ninety percent of those that died, did so within a week while 10% died after a week. Survivors and non-survivors were comparable based on demographic data (Table 4). When comparing survivors to non-survivors, there was a significant difference related to the emergency context (p = 0.001), surgical condition (p = 0.003), coma condition (p = 0.001), shock (p = 0.002), Charlson score  8 (p = 0.03), ASAPS score 8 ≥ at admission (p = 0.0001), stroke (p < 0.0001), diabetic complication (p = 0.01), and complication in ICU (p = 0.001) in univariate analysis.

Table 4.

Comparison of survivors and non-survivor’s patients (n = 237)

Characteristics All patients
(N = 237)
Non-survivors
(n = 173)
Survivors
(n = 64)
p value
Age (Mean; years) 71.7 ± 6.1 71.6 ± 5.9 72.1 ± 6.4 0.5
Age group (%)
 65–74 167 (70.4) 123 (73.6) 44 (26.3) 0.7
 75–84 58 (24.5) 42 (72.4) 16 (27.6) 0.9
 85 above 12 (5.1) 8 (66.6) 4 (33.3) 0.6
Gender
 Male (n = 167) 167 (70.4) 127 (76.05) 40 (23.9) 0.1
 Female (n = 70) 70 (29.6) 46 (65.7) 24 (34.3)
Reference specialty (%)
 Emergency service 134 (56.4) 108 (80.6) 26 (20.4) 0.001
 Medicine 21 (8.8) 14 (66.6) 7(33.8) 0.4
 Surgery 54 (22.8) 49 (90.7) 5(9.3) 0.003
Reasons for admission
 ACS 133 (56.1) 109 (81.9) 24 (18) < 0.001
 Poor condition 6 (2.5) 3 (50) 3 (50) 0.3
 Burn 11 (4.6) 7 (63.64) 4 (36.4) 0.4
 ARDS 9 (3.8) 7 (77.7) 2 (22.2) 1
 Shock 78 (32.9) 47 (60.3) 31 (39.7) 0.002
 Charlson Score (Median) 4.8 ± 1.8 4.6 ± 1.7 5.09 ± 2.04 0.12
 ≥ 8 20 (8.4) 11 (55) 9 (45) 0.03
 < 8 217 (91.6) 103 (47.4) 76 (52.6) 0.4
 Glasgow coma score (Mean valu) 9.64 ± 4.01 8.9 ± 3.8 11.8 ± 3.6 0.03
 < 8 42.06 69 (88.4) 9 (11.5) < 0.001
 ≥ 8 57.9 58 (68.2) 76 (31.8)
 ASAPS score (Mean) 7.9 ± 3.5 8.6 ± 3.5 5.8 ± 2.6 < 0.001
 ASAPS ≥8 150 (87) 13
 ASAPS < 8 109 (63.5) 36.6
Diagnosis
 Stroke 65 (27.4%) 57 (87.69%) 8 (12.31%) 0.001
 Peritonitis 22 (9.3%) 18 (81.82%) 4 (18.18%) 0.4
 AMCDA 20 (8.4%) 10 (50%) 10 (50%) 0.01
 SBTB 19 (8%) 18 (94.74%) 1 (5.26%) 0.02
 Bowel obstruction 13 (5.5%) 7 (53.85%) 6 (46.15%) 0.1
 Burn 10 (4.2%) 6 (60%) 4 (40%) 0.4
 Severe infection 10 (4.2%) 8 (80%) 2 (20%) 0.7
 Prostatic adenoma 9 (3.8%) 5 (55.56) 4 (44.44) 0.2
 Heart disease 6 (2.5%) 4 (66.67%) 2 (33.33%) 0.6
 Prostatic cancer 5 (2.1%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 0.01
 Inguinal hernia 5 (2.1%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%) 0.6
 OtherC 53 (22.4%) 36 (67.92%) 17 (32.08%) 0.1
Complications occurred in ICU
 Yes = 89 89 (37.5%) 80 (89.9%) 9 (10.1%) < 0.001
 Non = 148 148 (62.5%) 93 (62.8%) 55 (37.2%)
 Mechanical ventilation 2 (0.8%) 2 (100%) 0 Ki = 0.7
 Length of stay in ICU (mean) 5.3 ± 7.4 5.2 ± 8 5.5 ± 5.1 0.8

ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma

ICU Intensive Care Unit, ASAPS Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score

A Acute Metabolic Complication of Diabetes

B Severe Brain Trauuma

C Other disease

Most patients were between 64 to 74 years old. There was a significant difference between the age groups for Charlson score (p = 0.001) and complications in ICU (p = 0.01) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Comparison of patients according to age group (n = 237)

Variables 65–74 years
n = 167 (70.4%)
75–84 years
n = 58 (24.5%)
Over 84 years
n = 12 (5.1%)
p value
Age (Mean; years) 68.3 ± 2.8 78.2 ± 2.5 86.6 ± 1.6 < 0.001
Gender
 Male (n = 167) 118 40 9 0.9
 Female (n = 70) 49 18 3
Reasons for admission
 ACS 92 33 6 0.9
 Poor condition 68 26 5 0.6
 Burn 7 2 1 0.7
 ARDS 13 6 0 0.4
 Shock 11 4 2 0.4
 Charlson Score (Median) 4.5 5.1 6.3 0.001
 ≥ 8 12 5 3 0.1
 < 8 155 53 9
 Glasgow coma score (mean) 9.7 ± 4.02 9.4 ± 4.1 8.8 ± 3.5 0.6
 < 8 12 5 3 0.1
 ≥ 8 155 53 9
 ASAPS score (Mean) 7.9 ± 3.8 8.08 ± 2.9 8.1 ± 2.7 0.9
 ASAPS ≥8 65 25 8 0.1
 ASAPS < 8 77 22 4 0.4
Complications in ICU 0.01
 Yes = 89 65 19 5 0.6
 Non = 148 102 39 7
 Mechanical ventilation 2 0 0 0.6
 Length of stay ICU (mean) 5.3 ± 6.8 5.6 ± 9.2 2.7 ± 2.2 0.4
 Death 123 (73.6) 42 (72.4) 8 (66.6) 0.2

ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD, Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma

In multivariate analysis, surgery, coma at admission, shock, stroke, and severe brain trauma were independent risks factors of ICU death (Table 6).

Table 6.

Risk factors for ICU mortality of elderly patients

Diagnosis Adjusted OR (CI 95%) p
Clinical situation Reference
 Surgery 4.2 [2.4–10.3] 0.003
 Coma at admission 2.9 [1.6–5.4] 0.001
 Coma in ICU 5.8 [2.3–14.6]
 Shock during admission 2.2 [1.6–4.0] 0.002
 ASAPS ≥8 4.3 [1.1–8.5] 0.001
 Stroke 3.7 [1.6–8.7] 0.001
 Severe brain trauma 9.6 [1.2–75.1] 0.02
Complications occurred in ICU 0.001
 No Reference
 Yes 5.2 [2.4–11.3] 0.001

Discussion

This retrospective study found that elderly patients represented 11.2% of admissions to ICU. This rate is comparable to the (10%) of Owojuyigbe et al. [8] and the (16.6%) of Belayachi et al. [9]. In developed countries elderly admissions rate to ICU was high. The rate of admission in our study may be due to life expectancy shortness that reflects Burkinabè demographic profile.

Patients mean age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years in our study. Other study found a mean age of 72 years in Morocco [9], 75.4 ± 6.8 years in Brasilia [10] and 73 years in Nigeria [8]. In our study, patients were mainly males. There was no correlation between gender and admission in the literature [8, 9]. Some studies reported similar results to ours [11, 12], but Fowler et al. [13] reported higher mortality in the female group.

Patient outcome was poor in our study with a mortality rate of 73%. Belayachi et al. [9] in Morocco, Wade et al. [14] in Senegal reported 44.7 and 42.8% respectively. The high mortality reported in Africa compared to developed countries may be due to inadequate equipment, resources and care limitations [9].

Advanced age alone does not preclude successful outcome [15]. In multivariate analysis independent risk factors were surgical conditions, coma, shock during admission, ASAPS ≥8, stroke, severe brain trauma. This result is comparable to literature reports [16, 17]. In our findings, stroke was the main cause of hospitalization, followed by peritonitis. There is no difference between age groups in term of mortality. The mean length of stay in ICU was 5.3 ± 6.8 days. While 46.6% of patients died within the first 3 days of admission, 90% of patient died within a week. For patients over 84 years, LOS was shorter and in-hospital mortality was less than patients aged less than 84 years. This can be explained by the family taking their relative home once they understand that the outlook for recovery is bleak. This explains the relatively low mortality rate and short stay. The overall poor outcomes may be due to late consultation and poor quality of care due to the inadequate facilities, equipment and lack of medications. Delay in consultation may be related to limited education, use of traditional medicine, poverty with concern about hospital costs and poor transportation.

This study has limitations due to being retrospective. We did not assess the impact of pre-hospitalization condition. Blood test abnormalities, and the impact of APACHE and SOFA scores on outcome were not evaluated and long-term mortality after hospital discharge was not studied.

Conclusion

These results show that elderly patients in ICU have a high risk of ICU death. Risk factors include coma at admission, shock state, high ASAPS, severe brain trauma, stroke and surgical condition. We need to better equip our ICU to assess and manage carefully elderly patients in order to reduce ICU mortality. Training geriatric specialists could improve chronic disease care of older patients and reduce their admission to ICU. A prospective study could give more information on risk and long term outcome of these frail patients.

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge, Professor Mion and Dr. Owue for English language improvement of this paper.

Availability of data and materials

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author (LANKOANDE Martin m.hamtaani@gmail.com, 15 BP 106 Ouagadougou 15).

Abbreviations

ACS

Alteration of consciousness

AMCD

Acute metabolic complication of diabetes

APACHE

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ASAPS

Ambulatory simplified acute physiologic score

ICU

Intensive care unit

NCSRT

National Center of Scientific Research and Technology

OR

Odd ratio

SBT

Severe brain trauma

SOFA

Sequential organ failure assessment

Authors’ contributions

GS, ML collected and reviewed data; ML, SG, AS contributed to conception and design, analyzed and interpreted the data. ML, PB wrote the manuscript. RAFK revised of the manuscript in terms of important or intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

  • GS is a general practitioner,

  • ML is a Anesthetist working at in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit at Regional Hospital of Koudougou,

  • PB is an Assistant in Anesthesiology at the University PhD Joseph Ki-Zerbo.

  • AS is an Assistant in Anesthesiology at the University PhD Joseph Ki-Zerbo

  • RAFK, PhD, is a professor in Anesthesiology at the University PhD Joseph Ki-Zerbo.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethical and National Scientific Research and Technology Center (ENSRTC) (number 032/16) approved this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

M. Lankoandé, Email: m.hamtaani@gmail.com

P. Bonkoungou, Email: zambobonkoungou@gmail.com

A. Simporé, Email: and_simpo@yahoo.fr

G. Somda, Email: ghislainsomdak@gmail.com

R. A. F. Kabore, Email: kflavien72@yahoo.fr

References

  • 1.Mkum . WHO _ Definition of an Older or Elderly Person. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wan H, Goodkind D, Kowal P. An aging world: 2015. 2016. pp. P95/16–P95/11. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aegon . The changing face of retirement: the Aegon retirement readiness survey 2013—country reports. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Institut national de la statistique et de la demographie . La population du Burkina Faso de 1997 à 2006. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The world factbook. Africa, Burkina Faso, June 2017. URL: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uv.html. Accessed 21 June 2017.
  • 6.Bonkoungou P, Traoré I, Bako YP, Sanou J, Ouédraogo N. La mortalité en réanimation polyvalente du centre hospitalier universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo de Ouagadougou au Burkina–Faso. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014;33(2):A310. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2014.07.523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dia NM, et al. Interest of ambulatory simplified acute physiology score (ASAPS) applied to patients admitted in an intensive care unit of an infectious diseases unit in Dakar. PS SowBull Soc Pathol Exot. 2015;108:175–180. doi: 10.1007/s13149-015-0418-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Owojuyigbe AM, Adenekan AT, Babalola RN, Adetoye AO, Olateju SOA, Akonoghrere UO. Pattern and outcome of elderly admissions into the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a low resource tertiary hospital. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2016;21(2):40. doi: 10.4314/ecajs.v21i2.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jihane B, El khayari M, Dendane T, Madani N, Abidi K, Abouqal R, Zeggwagh AA. Factors predicting mortality in elderly patients admitted to a Moroccan medical intensive care unit. S Afr J Crit Care. 2012;28(1):22–27. doi: 10.7196/sajcc.122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Cristo Stein F, Barros RK, Feitosa FS, Toledo DO, da Silva JM, Jr, Ísola AM, Rezende E. Prognostic factors in elderly patients admitted in the intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(3):255–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Williams TA, Dobb GJ, Finn JC, Webb SA. Long-term survival from intensive care: a review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(10):1306–1315. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2744-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Friedrich JO, Wilson G, Chant C. Long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of hospital mortality in very long stay intensive care unit patients: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R59. doi: 10.1186/cc4888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, Juurlink DN, Pinto R, Hladunewich MA, et al. Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. Can Med Assoc J. 2007;177(12):1513–1519. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wade K, Diaby A, Niang E, Diallo A, Diatta B. Outcome of elderly patients in an intensive care unit in Dakar, Senegal. Méd Santé Trop. 2011;22(2):223–224. doi: 10.1684/mst.2012.0041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Rooij SE, Govers A, Korevaar JC, Abu-Hanna A, Levi M, de Jonge E. Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1039–1044. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lerolle N, Trinquart L, Bornstain C, Tadié J-M, Imbert A, Diehl J-L, et al. Increased intensity of treatment and decreased mortality in elderly patients in an intensive care unit over a decade*. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):59–64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b088ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tabah A, Philippart F, Timsit JF, Willems V, Français A, Leplège A, et al. Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R2. doi: 10.1186/cc8231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author (LANKOANDE Martin m.hamtaani@gmail.com, 15 BP 106 Ouagadougou 15).


Articles from BMC Anesthesiology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES