The right to health accepted as an essential human right and the world health organization (WHO) emphasizes to settle a right-based approach to health (1). The US administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018 requires imminent attention to the impact of sanctions on health of more than 80 million Iranians. In Iran, public health-care system plays a central role in providing health care and treatment services (2). The sanctions before 2015 indirectly targeted Iran public health system (3). New sanctions will have devastating effects on the health of many Iranians, notably patients suffered from cancer. Cancers are the third cause of death in Iran (4).
Nowadays fighting against malignancy requires a multidisciplinary approach. Early diagnosis of a malignancy makes the treatment easier and increases the chance of curative treatment (5). Diagnosis of malignancy is based on precise imaging studies and correct pathological results. To make a definite pathologic diagnosis, usually it is mandatory to add Immunohistochemical finding and genomic study with Histological finding (6, 7). Furthermore, recent studies insist on the role of new imaging technology like whole body MRI in earlier detection of tumor spreading through the body (8). Economic sanctions target the government general budget and decrease Iran currency value. So, cost of these diagnosis methods will increase too much that the public health insurance wouldn’t afford them.
Not only the diagnosis but also the treatment and follow up of cancer patients will be affected as well. Treatment of cancer consists of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (9). Iran Radiotherapy facilities are less than world standard level. During the embargo before 2015, the amount of these facilities had fallen sharply (10). Novel chemotherapy drugs and new biologic anti-cancer agents are too expensive and Iranian public insurance system may not be able to afford it for the increasing number of patients. More than 95% of Iranians are covered by government insurance, but inability of public insurance to cover the cost of these expensive treatments restricts the access of middle and lower economic layers of the population to these agents (11). This was a miserable experience that had occurred in the era of economic sanctions which ended by 2015 nuclear deal (12).
Meticulous surgery in cancers is dependent to high-tech equipment’s. Specifically, resection of sacrum and pelvic tumor are difficult because of anatomical location and needed navigation. Modular tumor prosthesis and osseointegrated prosthesis are today’s approved methods for limb sarcoma surgeries (13-15). These are just a few of the important use of advanced surgical technology in cancer treatment. Like what happened for buying medical facilities and specific drugs in the previous Iran sanctions (16). Difficulties in holding license for export of medical apparatus, financial transaction, and shipping insurance as well as fear of possible U.S. ban on international medical companies and international banks restrict the pathway of buying equipment needed for these surgeries. Finally follow up of malignant patient after treatment is dependent on modern technology, like PET-scan, the expensive technique which was affected in the same way mentioned above.
The same effects of cancer care have been observed in other set of economic sanctions including against of Iraq Syria and Cuba (17-19). Moreover, Sanctions restricted the access of health centers in Iran to collaborate with leading international research centers, and it could impede participation in international congress and workshops. It will endanger the cancer research in this country (20).
All the above is just a part of the concern on managing cancer patients in Iran. Finally, all direct or indirect effects of US new sanctions on Iranian patients are against Human rights.
References
- 1.Hunt P. Interpreting the international right to health in a human rights-based approach to health. Health Hum Rights. 2016;18(2):109–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khangah HA, Jannati A, Imani A, Salimlar S, Derakhshani N, Raef B. Comparing the health care system of Iran with various countries. Health Scope. 2017;6(1):e34459. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shahabi S. International sanctions: Sanctions in Iran disrupt cancer care. Nature. 2015;520(7546) doi: 10.1038/520157b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rouhollahi MR, Mohagheghi MA, Mohammadrezai N, Ghiasvand R, Ghanbari Motlagh A, Harirchi I, et al. Situation analysis of the national comprehensive cancer control program in the I R of Iran; assessment and recommendations based on the IAEA imPACT Mission. Arch Iran Med. 2014;17(4):222–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schiffman JD, Fisher PG, Gibbs P. Early detection of cancer: past, present, and future. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;35(1):57–65. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoshida A, Tsuta K, Ohno M, Yoshida M, Yoshitaka N, Kawai A, et al. STAT6 immunohistochemistry is helpful in the diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(4):552–9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dancsok AR, Asleh-Aburaya K, Nielsen TO. Advances in sarcoma diagnostics and treatment. Oncotarget. 2017;8(4):7068–93. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gorelik N, Reddy SMV, Turcotte RE, Goulding K, Jung S, Alcindor T, et al. Early detection of metastases using whole-body MRI for initial staging and routine follow-up of myxoid liposarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(3):369–79. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2845-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barr RD, Wunder JS. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are often curable--but at what cost? a call to arms (and legs) Cancer. 2009;115(18):4046–54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ameri A, Barzegartahamtan M, Ghavamnasiri M, Mohammadpour R, Dehghan H, Sebzari A, et al. Current and future challenges of radiation oncology in Iran: a report from the Iranian society of clinical oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018;30(4):262–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arab-zozani M. Health sector evolution in Iran; a short review. Evid Based Health Policy Manag Econ. 2017;1(3):193–7. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mohammadi D. US-led economic sanctions strangle Iran’s drug supply. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):279. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60116-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong KC, Kumta SM. Joint-preserving tumor resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):762–73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2536-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M. Navigation in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(4):501–14. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1059-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Y, Branemark R. Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation: the pioneering Swedish model. Unfallchirurg. 2017;120(4):285–92. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0331-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gorji A. Sanctions against Iran: the impact on health services. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(3):381–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Al-Hadad SA, Al-Jadiry MF, Al-Darraji AF, Al-Saeed RM, Al-Badr SF, Ghali HH. Reality of pediatric cancer in Iraq. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33(Suppl 2):S154–6. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318230e218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sen K, Al-Faisal W, AlSaleh Y. Syria: effects of conflict and sanctions on public health. J Public Health. 2013;35(2):195–9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garfield R. The public health impact of sanctions: contrasting responses of Iraq and Cuba. Middle East Report. 2000;215(1):16–9. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Afshari R, Bhopal RS. Iran, sanctions, and research collaborations. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1055–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00628-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]