Abstract
Disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis (DPL) is a rare condition that is characterized by the presence of multiple subperitoneal or peritoneal smooth muscle nodules of varying sizes on the omentum and peritoneal surfaces, grossly mimicking disseminated carcinoma. DPL usually develops in premenopausal women with a benign course, and it is often found incidentally during abdominal surgery. Malignant transformation is a rare clinical course of DPL. Only a few studies have focused on DPL transformation into a leiomyosarcoma. Herein, we describe the case of a 61-year-old woman with a history of recurrent leiomyoma of the uterus who presented with intermittent progressive abdominal pain. The imaging study revealed a huge heterogeneous density mass in the pelvic region with pulmonary and hepatic metastases. Exploratory laparotomy and debulking surgery were performed, and showed the coexistence of DPL and leiomyosarcoma. She died approximately one month after the diagnosis because of rapid progression of pleural effusion due to malignancy. This case highlights the clinical features of DPL and its malignant transformation and metastasis so physicians can make an early diagnosis and provide timely management.
Keywords: leiomyomatosis, peritonealis disseminata, leiomyosarcoma, sarcomatous transformation
1. Introduction
DPL is an extremely rare condition that is characterized by the presence of multiple smooth muscle, fibroblastic, and myofibroblastic nodules on the peritoneal surface of the pelvis and abdominal cavity [1]. The true prevalence of DPL is unclear because most individuals with DPL remain asymptomatic [2]. DPL usually occurs in premenopausal women and has a benign clinical course. Thus, it is very rare for DPL to become malignant. In previous literature, only 10 cases of DPL were associated with malignant transformation [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In advanced malignant transformation, the distant metastasis may progress rapidly in patients with DPL. Therefore, early diagnosis, timely surgical intervention, and appropriate chemotherapy are very important in order for physicians to control the progression of malignant transformation and metastasis. We describe the clinical features of DPL and highlight its malignant transformation and metastasis in an elderly woman.
2. Case Presentation
This case study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (07-CR-085) of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.
A 61-year-old G2P1AA1 woman presented with intermittent, progressive lower abdominal pain for three years. She had a medical history of hypertension that was controlled with medication. In 1993, she was diagnosed as having a uterine leiomyoma with leiomyomatosis of retroperitoneal tumors. Because of her desire to bear children in the future, she underwent myomectomy at that time. Subsequently, recurrent DPL developed two years later due to an enlarged palpable mass in the abdomen with intermittent abdominal pain. She underwent abdominal hysterectomy with left-sided oophorectomy and right ovary wedge resection in 1996. Results of the pathological report showed a borderline mucinous ovarian tumor of the left ovary. In 1998, recurrent DPL with left ureter involvement was noted, and the third operation involving debulking surgery and reteroneocystostomy was performed. Results of that pathological report showed no significant malignancy. She was regularly followed up at gynecologic clinics. In 1999, a 9 × 9-cm2 palpable pelvic mass was observed, and recurrent leiomyomatosis was suspected. A fourth laparotomy for tumor excision was suggested to the patient, but she refused. Hormone therapy with medroxyprogesterone (5-mg tablet daily) was performed until 2014 because of the progression of a thyroid nodular goiter and hypertension. After stopping hormone therapy, she reported intermittent, progressive lower abdominal pain, and a growing palpable mass was observed in the abdomen.
On admission, her temperature was 36.6 °C, blood pressure was 123/69 mmHg, heart rate was 83 beats/min, body weight was 59.8 kg, body height was 155.5 cm, and body mass index was 24.7 kg/m2. On pelvic examination, a huge tumor was palpable in the pelvis. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed huge solid tumors measuring about 15.17 × 24.48 × 10.51 cm3 in the pelvic field without free fluid in the cul-de-sac region (Figure 1A–D).
The laboratory evaluation showed the following: white blood cell count, 13,520 µL; hemoglobin level, 7.8 g/dL; fibrin degradation product level, >10,000 ng/mL; follicle-stimulating hormone level, 15.98 mIU/mL; progesterone level, 1.58 ng/mL; and, estradiol level, 32.84 pg/mL. No significant sign of infection or internal bleeding was indicated by the laboratory data. There were no significantly increased tumor markers, such as the carbohydrate antigen 125 level (20.2 IU/mL), carbohydrate antigen 19–9 level (10.20 IU/mL), and carcinoembryonic antigen level (0.649 ng/mL). The chest X-ray showed nodular densities in the right lower lung (Figure 2).
Contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography was performed and revealed three heterogeneous pelvic tumors, which were measuring approximately 9.4 × 8.6 × 9.3 cm3, 7.1 × 6.1 × 6.0 cm3, and 11.1 × 7.5 × 9.1 cm3, with multiple pulmonary nodules and multiple heterogeneous hepatic tumors. Therefore, distant metastasis was suspected. Severe hydronephrosis of the right kidney was obvious due to tumor compression (Figure 3A–E).
Exploratory laparotomy was recommended and performed. Three individual bulky tumors were encountered in the retroperitoneal pelvic cavity, which were found by the direct compression of the urinary bladder and both ureters. A solitary tumor mass measuring about 14.5 × 12 × 9 cm3 and weighing 1400 g was excised from the left paracolic gutter with extensive abdominal peritoneal carcinomatosis. The smooth-surfaced tumor seedings were suspected to be benign myomatous lesions. The right ovary was found in the right pelvic cavity and adhered to the interbowel loops. The pelvic tumor partially invaded the urinary bladder (Figure 4A–D). Nearly complete cytoreductive surgery was performed. The three individual bulky tumors were resected with the left ovary, right adnexa, paracolic gutter tumor, and cul-de-sac cells for cytology. Unlike complete staging surgery, she did not undergo omentectomy, appendectomy, and lymph node assessment.
Results of the final pathology report showed that the largest encapsulated tumor had many spindle cells with multinucleated pleomorphic nuclei, extensive necrosis, and a mitotic index of 11/10 per high power field, which is consistent with high-grade leiomyosarcoma (differentiation score = 3, mitotic score = 2, necrotic score = 2, total score = 7; French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group histologic grade 3). Immunohistochemistry staining showed that the tumor cells were reactive with desmin, negative with cytokeratin and CD117 (c-kit), and negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors. The immunohistochemical profile confirmed leiomyomatous differentiation in other small nodules that were seeding in the peritoneum and omentum, smaller pelvic masses with hypercellular spindle cell tumors, and minimal nuclear atypia, which were all indicative of leiomyomatosis. She was diagnosed as having a leiomyosarcoma arising from DPL at 61 years of age. Chemotherapy with doxorubicin caused the leiomyosarcoma.
Unfortunately, she died approximately one month after the diagnosis because of rapid progression of pleural effusion due to malignancy.
3. Discussion
Benign smooth muscle cells are mainly involved in DPL. Because of its rare prevalence rate, the origin of DPL remains unclear. A couple studies have hypothesized that DPL may arise from submesothelial multipotential cells with multiple factor stimuli for cell differentiation, such as hormones and genes [13,14]. The association between DPL and endometriosis or leiomyomas has been investigated. In previous studies, the metaplastic phenomenon and mullerianosis may involve the mechanism of DPL formation [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Generally, patients with DPL have a good prognosis, but the malignant transformation of DPL has been rarely reported. In addition, the coexistence of DPL and leiomyosarcoma has been reported in only a few case reports. In 2016, Tun et al. [11] reported a rare case of DPL that is concomitant with a leiomyosarcoma of the pelvis in a 56-year-old woman with a history of leiomyoma of the uterus. Her prognosis was poor because of the rapid progression of malignancy.
The detailed mechanism of malignant transformation of DPL plays an important role in the ability of physicians to detect the progression of malignancy early and to provide timely intervention. Currently, a new concept of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) suggests that malignant transformation is induced by EMT-activating transcription factors, which regulate all stages of cancer progression, including tumor proliferation, invasion, migration, distant metastasis, and drug resistance [20,21]. In mesenchymal tumors, such as bone and soft tissue sarcomas, the involvement of EMT is still largely unclear; however, several studies revealed that many sarcomas can progress by EMT-related processes and may manifest mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition [21]. In 2017, Yang et al. [22] reported a mesenchymal-to-epithelial reverting transition in leiomyosarcoma through the regulation of the expression of E-cadherin and the E-cadherin repressor, Slug/SNAI2. The EMT-involved tumor manifested with an advanced clinical course due to higher activity of tumor proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. In our case, the patient had a history of recurrent DPL for 21 years without any evidence of malignancy. During the long-term follow-up, acute progression of the mass induced multiple distant metastases within only three years. The pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyomatous differentiation with multinucleated pleomorphic nuclei, extensive necrosis, and a higher mitotic index. On the basis of our patient’s advanced clinical course, we suspected that EMT was involved, leading to the rapid malignant transformation from a benign tumor to a leiomyosarcoma. We think that it is necessary for clinicians to perform molecular and cytogenetic analyses of DPL as routine analyses in order to detect EMT-related processes and the malignant transformation of DPL.
In previous clinical reports, DPL with malignant transformation was rarely discussed. In Table 1, we present previously reported cases and summarize their clinical features, therapies, and prognoses. In 2004, Sharma et al. [10] reported an unusual occurrence of DPL with malignant transformation to a leiomyosarcoma in a 55-year-old post-menopausal woman. However, her previous records of surgery and subsequent histopathologic evaluation were missing. In 2015, Żyła et al. [23] described a 26-year-old woman with short-term recurrent abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding after removal of a leiomyoma. The imaging study revealed DPL, but the detailed diagnostic procedures were not performed. After two years, a pelvic mass was observed and removed. Results of the pathology report showed a low-grade non-metastatic endometrial sarcoma with minimal pleomorphism and a moderate mitotic index (6/10 per high power field). The patient’s clinical outcome was good. When compared to previous data, our patient had a longer follow-up duration and underwent more surgeries for recurrent DPL. However, results of the pathology report indicated no significant evidence of malignancy. Results of the laboratory evaluation of hormonal and tumor markers were also unremarkable. Further, B symptoms, such as a fever, night sweats, and weight loss, were not present in our patient, and no significant vaginal bleeding or discharge was noted. Results of a previous Pap smear revealed only inflammation without atypical cells. Panendoscopy showed only a mild gastric and duodenal ulcer with no evidence of malignancy. Thus, we conclude that no distinct clinical features are predictive of malignancy. Based on reported cases, young age and the early detection of malignancy may improve patients’ clinical outcome before rapid progression of multiple metastases.
Table 1.
Study | Age | Obstetrical History | Clinical Presentation | OC Use | Location | MT Interval | Malignancy | Surgery | Adjuvant Therapy | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubin et al. [4] | 27 | G1 | Found at cesarean section | ND | 1. Pelvis 2. Bone metastases |
6 months | Small spindle cell sarcoma | 1. TAH and RSO 2. Partial omentectomy 3. Resection of peritoneal implants |
Radiotherapy Chemotherapy: 1. Doxorubicin 2. Cyclophosphamide 3. Cisplatin |
Died 23 months |
Akkersdijk et al. [3] | 25 | G0 | Acute right lower abdominal pain. | None | 1. Omentum 2. Colon 3. Small intestine |
1 year | LMS | 1. TAH and RSO 2. Partial omentectomy 3. Resection of peritoneal implants |
Hormonal therapy: 1. GnRH agonists |
Died 22 months |
Abulafia et al. [6] | 20 | G0 | Left lower abdominal pain for 2 months | None | 1. Omentum 2. Pelvis |
1 year | LMS | 1. Cytoreductive surgery 2. Omentectomy |
Hormonal therapy: 1. Leuprolide acetate Chemotherapy: 1. Doxorubicine 2. Ifosfamide 3. Etoposide |
Died 24 months |
Raspagliesi et al. [5] | 26 | G0 | ND | None | 1. Left adnexa | 4 months | LMS | 1. Adnexectomy | Chemotherapy: 1. Infliximab 2. Dacarbazine 3. Epirubicin |
No recurrences after 3 years |
Fulcher AS et al. [7] | 48 | G2 | Dyspareunia and severe pelvic pain | None | 1. Pelvis 2. Subdiaphragmatic mass |
3 months | LMS | 1. TAH and BSO 2. Omentectomy 3. Resection of peritoneal nodules 4. Biopsy of subdiaphragmatic mass |
Chemotherapy: 1. Epirubicin 2. Ifosfamide 3. Dacarbazine |
Died |
Morizaki et al. [9] | 33 | G0 | Lower abdominal pain | None | 1. Peritoneum 2. Mesentery 3. Descending colon 4. Pelvis |
4 months | 1. LMS 2. Fibrosarcoma |
1. Laparotomy 2. Resection of peritoneal nodules |
Chemotherapy: 1. Cisplatin 2. Cyclophosphamide |
Died 11 months |
Sharma et al. [10] | 55 | ND | Abdominal swelling for 1 year |
None | 1. Omentum 2. Mesentery |
1 year | LMS | 1. Laparotomy 2. Resection of peritoneal nodules |
No | ND |
Lamarca et al. [24] | 37 | G0 | Increased abdominal perimeter | None | 1. Peritoneal cavity | 0 month | LMS | 1. TAH and BSO 2. Tumor mass resection |
Hormonal therapy: 1. Triptorelin Chemotherapy: 1. Adriamicine 2. Gemcitabine 3. Isophosphamide 4. Trabectedin 5. Sorafenib |
Died 24 months |
Zyla MM et al. [23] | 26 | G0 | Abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding | OCP | 1. Omentum 2. Peritoneal cavity 3. Pelvis 4. Retroperitoneal space |
1 year | Endometrial sarcoma |
1. TAH and BSO 2. Omentectomy 3. Appendectomy 4. Pelvic lymphadenectomy 5. Tumoral mass resection |
Hormonal therapy: 1. GnRH agonists |
No recurrences after 1 year |
Tun AM et al. [11] | 56 | ND | Abdominal distension | ND | 1. Pelvis 2. Peritoneum 3. Omentum 4. Lung and liver metastases |
ND | LMS | 1. Exploratory laparotomy 2. Debulking of the tumors |
Chemotherapy: 1. Gemcitabine 2. Docetaxel |
Died 5 months |
Shahin NA et al. [12] | 48 | ND | Menorrhagia for one year |
None | 1. Right lumbar 2. Pelvis 3. Left upper abdomen 4. Douglas pouch |
6 months | LMS | 1. Laparotomy 2. Resection of the mass |
Chemotherapy | Died 15 months |
Syed M et al. [12] | 40 | ND | Abdominal pain for 7 months | OCP | 1. Peritoneum 2. Bilateral adnexa 3. Recto-uterine pouch 4. Pre-vesical space 5. Left rectus 6. Abdominis muscle |
3 years | LMS | 1. TAH and BSO 2. Debulking of the tumors |
ND | ND |
LMS: leiomyosarcoma, ND: no data, OC: oral contraceptives, TAH: transabdominal hysterectomy, RSO: Right side Salpingo-Oophorectomy, MT Interval: malignant transformation interval time.
Our patient was diagnosed as having DPL at 61 years of age. She underwent nearly complete staging surgery. In previous studies, the surgery performed was based on the tumor size. The huge tumor was resected as complete staging surgery because we suspected malignancy. In our patient, we think that the several instances of recurrence were an indicator of malignancy and the need for advanced therapies. Atypia in the pathology report may have been another indicator of early malignant transformation. Therefore, we think that molecular and cytogenetic analyses of DPL should be routine. Herein, we highlighted the clinical and imaging features of leiomyosarcoma so that physicians can make an early diagnosis and provide timely medical and surgical intervention to improve outcomes. We also recommend that these rare cases be referred to specialized centers.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the grant of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital (TCRD-TPE-106-RT-4).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.-C.C.; C.-H.L. and S.-C.H.; Validation, M.-Y.W.; G.-T.Y. and C.-J.L.; Investigation, C.-H.L.; S.-C.H.; H.-S.Y. and W.-L.L.; Data Curation, H.-C.C.; C.-H.L. S.-C.H. and G.-T.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, H.-C.C. and M.-Y.W.; Writing—Review & Editing, W.-L.L.; C.-J.L. and W.-Y.K.; Supervision, C.-J.L. and W.-Y.K.; Project Administration, W.-Y.K. All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Wu C., Zhang X., Tao X., Ding J., Hua K. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata: A case report and review of the literature. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2016;4:957–958. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Halama N., Grauling-Halama S.A., Daboul I. Familial clustering of Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata: An unknown genetic syndrome? BMC Gastroenterol. 2005;5:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-5-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Akkersdijk G.J., Flu P.K., Giard R.W., van Lent M., Wallenhurg H.C. Malignant leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990;163:591–593. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91205-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rubin S.C., Wheeler J.E., Mikuta J.J. Malignant leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986;68:126–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raspagliesi F., Quattrone P., Grosso G., Cobellis L., Di Re E. Malignant degeneration in leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Gynecol. Oncol. 1996;61:272–274. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abulafia O., Angel C., Sherer D.M., Fultz P.J., Bonfiglio T.A., DuBeshter B. Computed tomography of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with malignant transformation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;169:52–54. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90130-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fulcher A.S., Szucs R.A. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata complicated by sarcomatous transformation and ovarian torsion: Presentation of two cases and review of the literature. Abdom. Imaging. 1998;23:640–644. doi: 10.1007/s002619900421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bekkers R.L.M., Willemsen W.N.P., Schijf C.P.T., Massuger L.F.A.G., Bulten J., Merkus J.M.W.M. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata: Does malignant transformation occur? A literature review. Gynecol. Oncol. 1999;75:158–163. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morizaki A., Hayashi H., Ishikawa M. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with malignant transformation. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1999;66:43–45. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharma P., Chaturvedi K.U., Gupta R., Nigam S. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with malignant change in a post-menopausal woman. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;95:742–745. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tun A.M., Tun N.M., Zin Thein K., Naing E.E., Giashuddin S., Shulimovich M. A Rare Concurrence of Leiomyomatosis Peritonealis Disseminata, Leiomyosarcoma of the Pelvis and Leiomyomatous Nodule of the Liver. Case Rep. Oncol. Med. 2016;2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/3025432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Syed M., Parida B., Mankeshwar T., Patil A. Imaging Findings in a Rare Case of Leiomyomatosis Peritonealis Disseminata with Malignant Transformation. Pol. J. Radiol. 2017;82:426–430. doi: 10.12659/PJR.902242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Al-Talib A., Tulandi T. Pathophysiology and possible iatrogenic cause of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2010;69:239–244. doi: 10.1159/000274487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haberal A., Kayikcioglu F., Caglar G.S., Cavusoglu D. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata presenting with intravascular extension and coexisting with endometriosis: A case report. J. Reprod. Med. 2007;52:422–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Batt R.E., Smith R.A., Buck Louis G.M., Martin D.C., Chapron C., Koninckx P.R., Yeh J. Mullerianosis. Histol. Histopathol. 2007;22:1161–1166. doi: 10.1177/1933719112472736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dauge M.C., Delmas V., Grossin M., Rubinstajn B., Moulonguet A., Bocquet L. Disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis associated with endometriosis. Apropos of a case. Ann. Pathol. 1986;6:221–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gana B.M., Byrne J., McCullough J., Weaver J.P. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata (LPD) with associated endometriosis: A case report. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1994;39:258–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herrero J., Kamali P., Kirschbaum M. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata associated with endometriosis: A case report and literature review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1998;76:189–191. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00173-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Batt R.E. Pathogenesis of a parauterine uterus-like mass: Developmentally misplaced mullerian tissue—Mullerianosis. Fertil. Steril. 2010;94:e45. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brabletz T., Kalluri R., Nieto M.A., Weinberg R.A. EMT in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:128. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sannino G., Marchetto A., Kirchner T., Grünewald T.G. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal and Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition in Mesenchymal Tumors: A Paradox in Sarcomas? Cancer Res. 2017;77:4556–4561. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang J., Eddy J.A., Pan Y., Hategan A., Tabus I., Wang Y., Cogdell D., Price N.D., Pollock R.E., Lazar A.J.F., et al. Integrated proteomics and genomics analysis reveals a novel mesenchymal to epithelial reverting transition in leiomyosarcoma through regulation of slug. Mol. Cell Prot. 2010;9:2405–2413. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.000240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Żyła M.M., Dzieniecka M., Kostrzewa M., Stetkiewicz T., Wilamowska A., Księżakowska-Łakoma K., Wilczyński J.R. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata of unusual course with malignant transformation: Case report. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015;94:220–223. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lamarca M., Rubio P., Andrés R., Rodrigo C. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with malignant degeneration. A case report. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2011;32:702–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]