Abstract
The maize (Zea mays) stigma, which is commonly known as silk, is indispensable for reproduction and thus for grain yield. Here, we isolated a spontaneous mutant sk-A7110, which completely lacks silk; scanning electron microscopy showed that the sk-A7110 pistils degenerated during late floret differentiation. Genetic analysis confirmed that this trait was controlled by a recessive nuclear gene and sk-A7110 was mapped to a 74.13-kb region on chromosome 2 between the simple sequence repeat markers LA714 and L277. Sequence analysis of candidate genes in this interval identified a single-nucleotide insertion at position 569 downstream of the transcriptional start site in Zm00001d002970, which encodes a UDP-glycosyltransferase; this insertion produces a frameshift and premature translational termination. RNA-sequencing analysis of young ears identified 258 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between sk-A7110 and the wild type (WT), including 119 up- and 139 down-regulated genes. Interestingly, most DEGs related to jasmonic acid (JA) synthesis were up-regulated in the mutant compared to WT. Consistent with this, the JA and JA-Isoleucine (JA-Ile) contents were significantly higher in sk-A7110 ears than in WT. At the same time, RNA-sequencing analysis of tassels showed that sk-A7110 could reduce the number of tassel branches in maize by down-regulating the expression of UB2 and UB3 genes. Our identification of the sk-A7110 mutant and the responsible gene will facilitate further studies on female infertility research or maize breeding.
Keywords: maize, silkless, map-based cloning, RNA-seq analysis, jasmonic acid
Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is a monoecious plant with separate male (tassel: formed by apical meristem) and female (ear: formed by axillary meristems) inflorescences. The inflorescence development in maize is determined by three different types of meristems: the spikelet-pair meristems (SPMs), spikelet meristems (SMs) and floral meristems (FMs). Male and female inflorescences undergo almost identical development before the initiation of sex determination. Early female and male florets have same floral organ primordia, which include one lemma, one pair of lodicules, three stamen primordia, and one pistil primordium. Mature unisexual flowers form via selective abortion (or degradation) of the floral organ primordia (Cheng et al., 1983; Calderon-Urrea and Dellaporta, 1999). In sex determination, the pistil primordium of the male tassel and the lower floret and stamen primordium of the ear degenerate, ultimately producing a functional unisexual flower. Therefore, the fate of the pistil has a central role in sex determination in maize.
Studies of mutants with alterations in sex determination have shown that pistil development is associated with complex processes such as selective cell death, cytoprotection and signal transduction (Cheng et al., 1983; Calderon-Urrea and Dellaporta, 1999; Chuck et al., 2007; Hultquist and Dorweiler, 2008). Among these processes, the regulation of phytohormone signaling plays a crucial role in fate determination of the pistil. Studies of various male mutants, which lack female organs, showed that endogenous gibberellic acids (GAs) play a major role in promoting stamen degradation and inhibiting the abortion of the pistil primordium in the male panicle (Calderon-Urrea and Dellaporta, 1999). The developing pistils can produce high levels of GA, which is conductive to the maturation of the silk and inhibit the development of stamens (Dellaporta and Calderon-Urrea, 1994; Eveland et al., 2014). Analysis of adenosine phosphate-isopentenyltransferase (IPT), a key cytokinin biosynthesis enzyme, suggested that high concentrations of cytokinin can inhibit pistil abortion in lower florets and determine pistil cell fate during sex determination (Young et al., 2004). Studies showed that brasinosteroids (BRs) plays an important role in stamen and anther development (Hartwig et al., 2012). Polar auxin transport plays an important role in meristem development and floral organ morphology. For example, maize Barren Inflorescence 2 (Bif2) encodes a serine threonine protein kinase that controls auxin polarity transport through regulation of the subcellular localization of PIN proteins. Its mutant bif2 has reduced number of female ears and significantly reduced number of tassel branch and floret numbers (McSteen et al., 2007). In male inflorescences of the tasselseed 1 (ts1) and ts2 mutants, endogenous JA contents are significantly reduced, and external JA treatment restores stamen development (Acosta et al., 2009; Chuck, 2010). These findings suggest that JA mediates pistils abortion in maize tassels, but its effect on the development of pistils in the ear requires further study.
In this study, we identified a spontaneous maize mutant sk-A7110, which completely lacks silk and has significantly reduced tassel branching. In sk-A7110 mutant ears, the pistils degrade at late stage of floret differentiation. We mapped the sk-A7110 locus and identified a single-nucleotide insertion in Zm00001d002970, which encodes a UDP-glycosyltransferase, leading to a frame shift and early termination. RNA-seq analysis showed that mutation of this gene affects many genes and multiple pathways. JA contents were significantly higher in mutant ears than in wild type (WT). These results suggest that Zm00001d002970 is the responsible gene for sk-A7110 and that it is related to JA metabolism.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Mapping Population
Wild type maize inbred lines A7110, B73, P2, and 80044 were used in this study. The sk-A7110 mutant was identified from the maize inbred line A7110, and sk1, whose phenotype is very similar to that of sk-A7110, was obtained from the Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center1. Since sk-A7110 is completely masculinized, the sk-A7110 stock was maintained by mating sk-A7110 with +/sk-A7110 siblings. One near isogenic line population was constructed by crossing +/sk-A7110 with sk-A7110. Three BC1 backcross populations were produced by crossing sk-A7110 with inbred lines B73, P2, and 80044, followed by backcrossing with sk-A7110. These three BC1 segregating populations and one near isogenic line population were used for segregation analysis of the mutant phenotype and the P2/sk-A7110//sk-A7110 population was used for mapping purposes. All materials were grown at the Experimental Station of Shandong Agricultural University (Tai’an, China).
Scanning Electron Microscopy
For scanning electron microscopy, female inflorescences and male inflorescence at different developmental stages were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution overnight and dehydrated in an ethanol series. The samples were critical point dried, and glumes were manually dissected to reveal developing florets. The samples were sputter coated with palladium for 60 s and viewed on a Hitachi S-4700 at an accelerating voltage of 2kV. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS2.
Genetic Analysis and Molecular Mapping
The phenotype of the F1 plants and three BC1 populations was investigated. The main phenotypes we investigated were: whether vegetative growth was normal, whether there were filaments, the size of female ears, and the number of male branches.
For genetic mapping of the sk-A7110 locus, bulked segregant analysis (BSA) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular markers were used. 228 SSR markers distributed over all 10 chromosomes were used to screen polymorphism between P2 and sk-A7110. Two DNA pools (a mutant pool and a WT pool) prepared from 10 individuals/pool of the BC1 population are used to detect selected polymorphic primers. For fine mapping, new SSR markers between umc1555 and umc1448 were developed by SSR Hunter 1.3 and Primers 5.0. Polymorphic molecular markers used for gene mapping are in Supplementary Table S1.
Transcriptome Analysis
A P2/sk-A7110/sk-A7110 population was planted in the filed during the summer of 2016. Because mutant and WT plants were indistinguishable before appearing of the silks, the plants were genotyped using molecular markers linked to the sk-A7110 gene at the seedling stage. Heterozygous normal (sk-A7110/+) and mutant plants (sk-A7110/sk-A7110) in the population were marked with closely linked markers. The young ears of WT and mutants at the nine-leaf stage were quickly transferred to a centrifuge tube and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Additionally, the young tassels of mutants (sk-A7110/sk-A7110) and the WT (SK-A7110/SK-A7110) of its near isogenic line at the nine-leaf stage were quickly transferred to a centrifuge tube and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Per biological replicate samples from 15 plants were pooled. Three WT biological replicates and three mutants once were made. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Takara). RNA-seq libraries construction and sequencing were both performed at Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). RNA-seq data of ears and tassels were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP155767 (BioProject ID: PRJNA483126) and SRP155763 (BioProject ID: PRJNA483310), respectively.
The reads were mapped to the maize reference genome B73 AGPv3 using TopHat. Differential expression analysis of six samples was performed using the DESeq R package, and p-values were adjusted to control the false discovery rate. Unigenes with an adjusted p (q) value < 0.05 identified by DESeq were considered to be differentially expressed.
GO annotation and GO enrichment analysis (corrected p-value < 0.05) of DEGs were performed to further investigate their functions. GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs was conducted using GOseq R packages (Young et al., 2010) based on Wallenius non-central hyper-geometric distribution. GO terms with corrected p (q) value < 0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched among the DEGs. To further investigate the biological functions and interactions of genes, pathway-based analysis was conducted using KEGG (Kanehisa et al., 2008).
Endogenous Hormones Measurement
Samples were prepared as described for transcription analysis. Tissue samples were stored at -80°C prior to solvent extraction. Hormone quantification was performed via vapor phase extraction for sample preparation and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as described (Stitz et al., 2011). Hormone levels were analyzed with a Shimadzu LC/MS-8040 as described (Stitz et al., 2011).
Allelism Analysis
Since both sk1 and sk-A7110 are silkless, a heterozygous plant (+/sk-A7110) from the offspring of sk-A7110/sk-A7110 and SK-A7110/SK-A7110 was used as the female parent and a sk1 homozygous mutant (sk1/sk1) was used as the male parent for hybridization. The hybrid progeny were planted and their female phenotypes scored. A segregation ratio of wild type: silkless mutant plants of approximately 1:1 would indicate that sk1 and sk-A7110 are allelic mutants, and the presence of all normal progeny would indicate that they are not allelic.
Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis (qRT-PCR)
To validate the DEGs identified by RNA-seq and to analyze the expression of other genes, quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed. The samples were prepared as described for transcriptome analysis. Samples were pooled from 5 plants per biological replicate (three biological replicates of WT and mutant). Total RNA was isolated from frozen samples using an EASYspin Plus Plant RNA Kit (Aidlab). High-quality first-strand cDNA was generated using a HiFiScript gDNA Removal cDNA Synthesis Kit (Calbiotech). The maize ACTIN gene was used as an internal control. Gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR are provided in Supplementary Table S3.
Results
Phenotypic Characterization of sk-A7110
In 2012, we identified the sk-A7110 mutant in the field. Phenotypic observation showed that there was no difference in vegetative growth, plant height, ear height, pollen viability, or other traits between this mutant and the WT (results not shown), but the mutant completely lacked silks (Figure 1A). In addition, the volume of the ear was substantially smaller in the mutant than in WT, although the cob retained the typical conical shape (Figure 1B). Moreover, some female spikelet of the mutant had male characteristics, such as, some ears had male spikelet at the top (Supplementary Figure S1A), and some ears had yellow anthers (Supplementary Figure S1B).
We also detected a significant decrease in tassel branching in sk-A7110 compared to WT (Figure 1C). Therefore, we counted the numbers of tassel branches in WT and mutant plants in three segregating populations. The number of branches, especially secondary branches, was significantly reduced in sk-A7110 tassels compared to WT (Table 1), indicating that tassel branch differentiation is inhibited in this mutant.
Table 1.
Combinations | Branch type | Average branch no. of wild type (N = 30) | Average branch no. of sk-A7110 (N = 30) |
---|---|---|---|
80044 /sk-A7110//sk-A7110 | Primary branch | 8.89 | 6.24∗∗ |
Secondary branch | 2.11 | 0.83∗∗ | |
B73 /sk-A7110//sk-A7110 | Primary branch | 11.65 | 9.58∗∗ |
Secondary branch | 3.72 | 1.65∗∗ | |
+/sk-A7110/sk-A7110 | Primary branch | 7.95 | 3.95∗∗ |
Secondary branch | 2.45 | 0.3∗∗ | |
∗∗Indicates the different is significance (Student’s t-test: ∗∗P < 0.01).
The Pistil Primordium of sk-A7110 Degenerates During the Late Stage of Floret Differentiation
To identify the origin of the silkless and phenotype, we performed scanning electron microscopy of female panicles at different developmental stages in WT and sk-A7110 plants. In the WT ears, the pistil primordia bulged and elongated rapidly, beginning at the last stage of floret differentiation (Figures 2D,E). However, in sk-A7110 ear, the pistil primordia shrinked and began to degenerate at the same stage (Figures 2I,J), which is completely opposite to WT. By contrast, other developmental stages of the ear, such as apical cone elongation (Figures 2A,F), spikelet differentiation (Figures 2B,G), and floret differentiation (Figures 2C,H) were the same in the mutant and the WT. These results suggest that during ear development, the defects in sk-A7110 first occur during the last stage of floret differentiation. We also observed the differentiation of tassel by scanning electron microscope. It was found that the sk-A7110 mutant had fewer branching meristems than the WT (Figures 3A,C), but there is no distinct difference in the spikelet meristem (Figures 3B,D).
Genetic Analysis and Mapping of sk-A7110 Gene
All F1 plants were normal, and the phenotypes segregated in the three BC1 population was consistent with a WT: mutant ratio of 1:1, as determined by Chi-square testing (Table 2). Taken together, these results indicate that sk-A7110 is controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene.
Table 2.
Populations | Total No | No. of wild type | No. of mutant | Theoretical ratio | ( X2 0.05 ≤ 3.84) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80044 /sk-A7110// sk-A7110 | 938 | 465 | 473 | 1:1 | 0.68 |
B73 /sk-A7110// sk-A7110 | 231 | 117 | 114 | 1:1 | 0.4 |
P2 /sk-A7110// sk-A7110 | 2785 | 1422 | 1363 | 1:1 | 1.25 |
We mapped the sk-A7110 gene using bulked segregant analysis (BSA) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Initially, we screened 228 SSR markers distributed over all 10 chromosomes and identified 37 polymorphic markers between P2 and the mutant. These 37 markers were used to screen DNA pools and identified multiple markers on chromosome 2 that might co-segregate with the sk-A7110 gene. Subsequently, analysis of 134 mutant individuals derived from a P2/sk-A7110//sk-A7110 population showed that two SSR markers (umc1555 and umc1448) on the long arm of chromosome 2 are linked to sk-A7110, at a genetic distance of 2.24 and 6.72 cM, respectively (Figure 4A).
We then designed 292 pairs of specific primers between umc1555 and umc1448 and used 2785 individuals with mutant phenotypes from the P2/sk-A7110//sk-A7110 population and 938 mutant individuals from the 80044/sk-A7110/sk-A7110 population for fine mapping. This ultimately delimited the sk-A7110 locus to a 74.13-kb region between LA714 and L277 (Figure 4B).
Candidate Gene Annotation and Sequence Analysis
Two gene models were predicted in the 74.13-kb target region based on the maize B73 sequence (version 4.0)2 (Figure 4C). Gene annotation showed that one of these genes, Zm00001d002970, encodes an uncharacterized family 1 uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferase and the other, Zm00001d002971, encodes a DUF177 domain protein. DNA sequence comparison between sk-A7110 and WT revealed that a single nucleotide, G, was inserted at base 569 downstream of the ATG start codon of Zm00001d002970 in sk-A7110 (Figure 4D); this resulted in the encoded amino acid is inconsistent from the 190th, and the number of encoded amino acids is reduced from 511 to 297. No sequence difference was found in Zm00001d002971 between sk-A7110 and WT. Sequencing primers for candidate genes are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
To verify the specificity of the mutation, we analyzed the full-length genomic sequences of Zm00001d002970 in inbred lines 80044, WY-3, Zheng58, B583, MZ1, LY37, HC, 1145, HZ4 and CL100 and found that G was inserted in this gene only in the mutant (Figure 4E). Moreover, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that Zm00001d002970 was expressed at significantly lower levels in sk-A7110 than in WT, indicating that its expression is significantly inhibited in the mutant (Figure 4F). Based on these results, we identified Zm00001d002970, which encodes UDP-glycosyltransferase, as the candidate gene responsible for the sk-A7110 phenotype.
Transcriptome Analysis
To examine the genes and pathways affected by the mutation of SK-A7110, we conducted mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of the WT and sk-A7110 to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ear and tassle inflorescence. This identified 258 DEGs based on the criteria of corrected p-value < 0.05 between WT ears and sk-A7110 ears, including 119 up- and 139 down-regulated DEGs (Supplementary Data Sheet S1). Similarly, 43 DEGs were found in WT and sk-A7110 tassels (Supplementary Data Sheet S2), among which 33 were up-regulated and 11 were down regulated. To validate the RNA-seq expression data, we subjected 15 randomly selected DEGs to qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR results were in good agreement with the RNA-seq results, indicating that the RNA-seq data were highly reliable (Table 3).
Table 3.
Genes | RNA-seq | qRT-PCR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WT | sk-A7110 | WT | sk-A7110 | |
Zm00001d011687 | 24.806 | 690.594 | 1 | 22.471 |
Zm00001d004417 | 141.777 | 0.333 | 1 | 0.029 |
bde | 1036.838 | 493.030 | 1 | 0.853 |
lox10 | 650.960 | 4962.510 | 1 | 2.072 |
ra1 | 162.020 | 85.307 | 1 | 0.406 |
ZAG1 | 483.691 | 120.439 | 1 | 0.246 |
ZAG2 | 230.209 | 10.716 | 1 | 0.024 |
zmm2 | 5.412 | 1.012 | 1 | 0.692 |
zmm6 | 1552.138 | 439.914 | 1 | 0.161 |
UB2 | 16.087 | 6.210 | 1 | 0.411 |
UB3 | 9.367 | 3.830 | 1 | 0.378 |
Zm00001d033020 | 14.217 | 3.710 | 1 | 0.316 |
Zm00001d052543 | 5.927 | 13.823 | 1 | 2.870 |
Zm00001d042922 | 5.960 | 1.803 | 1 | 0.445 |
Zm00001d049950 | 2.387 | 5.987 | 1 | 1.878 |
To further explore the functions of the DEGs, we performed GO annotation and GO enrichment analysis (corrected p-value < 0.05). For DEGs between the WT and mutant ears, the significantly enriched GO terms included the following: primary active transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0015399), P-P-bond-hydrolysis-driven transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0015405), ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances (GO:0042626) and ATPase activity, coupled to movement of substances (GO:0043492) (Figure 5). All of these terms belong to the molecular function group, suggesting that SK-A7110 may play significant roles in transmembrane transport of substances.
Among the DEGs that were down-regulated in the mutant ears, the most significantly enriched GO terms were nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity (GO:0001071) and transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding (GO:0003700). A total of 28 differentially expressed transcription factor genes, in multiple families, were detected in WT vs. sk-A7110 (Supplementary Table S4); these included MADS-box, AP2-EREBP, MYB, and bHLH transcription factors. These findings indicate that these transcription factors play important roles in sex determination in maize inflorescences and provide clues for further exploration of inflorescence development in maize.
KEGG analysis identified 139 DEGs in ears with KEGG annotations, and these DEGs are enriched in 66 pathways mainly involved in biochemical metabolism and signal transduction. No significantly enriched pathway was found according to the KEGG screening standard (corrected p-value < 0.05), which may be due to the sampling period was a little late. However, the top pathway of our KEGG analysis results is mainly related to the metabolism of a variety of amino acids, ascorbic acid metabolism, and α-linolenic acid metabolism (JA biosynthesis) (Supplementary Table S5).
Previous studies have shown that the inflorescence development is closely related to endogenous hormones in plants. Therefore, we checked more in detail hormone related pathways, and found that only JA synthesis pathway is relatively enriched. In addition, studies of the ts1 and ts2 mutants have shown that JA is involved in apoptosis in maize pistils, so we focused on the JA biosynthesis pathway. Based on the RNA-seq data, among the 31 genes in this pathway, 17 genes were upregulated in the mutant, including nine with a | log2 ratio|≥ 1 (Supplementary Table S6). These DEGs included two significantly up-regulated genes encoding key enzymes of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, lipoxygenase (LOX10) and allene oxide synthase (AOS) (Figure 6). These results suggest that the phenotype of sk-A7110 is likely associated with effects on JA metabolism.
Analysis of the RNA-seq data of tassels found that DEGs were mainly enriched in amino acid metabolism and secondary biomass metabolic pathways. And in the down-regulated expression gene, two genes associated with the tassel branch of maize, UB2 and UB3, were down-regulated significantly (Table 4). Both UB2 and UB3 are member of the SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like (SPL) gene family, and their expression levels were down-regulated in both ub2 and ub3 mutants with the number of tassel branches being significantly reduced (Chuck et al., 2014; Du et al., 2017). This indicates that sk-A7110 affects the number of tassel branches in maize by regulating the expression of UB3 and UB2. Further analysis of the RNA-seq data of ears revealed that three genes involved in maize inflorescence development, ZAG1, ZAG2 and bearded-ear 1 (bde1), are significantly down-regulated in sk-A7110 (Table 4). Together, these results suggest that SK-A7110 regulates maize inflorescence development in conjunction with multiple inflorescence development-related genes.
Table 4.
Gene ID | Gene name | log2 Fold Change | Gene description | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zm00001d037737 | ZAG1 | -2.0058 | MADS transcription factor | Mena et al., 1996 |
Zm00001d041781 | ZAG2 | -4.4251 | MADS transcription factor | Schmidt et al., 1993 |
Zm00001d017614 | bde1 | -1.0724 | bearded-ear1 | Thompson et al., 2009 |
Zm00001d031451 | UB2 | -1.3470 | unbranched2 | Chuck et al., 2014 |
Zm00001d052890 | UB3 | -1.3170 | Unbranched3 | Du et al., 2017 |
Endogenous Hormone Concentrations
We measured endogenous hormone levels in young ears of WT and mutant plants. Levels of salicylic acid (SA), GA, and the auxin indole acetic acid (IAA) were lower in sk-A7110 than in WT, whereas JA, ABA, and JA-Ile levels were higher in sk-A7110 than in WT and there was little difference in zeaxanthin (ZA) levels (Figure 7). Among these phytohormones, the contents of JA, JA-Ile, IAA and GAs significantly differed between the two lines. These results indicate that the mutant phenotype is closely related to endogenous hormone levels.
Allelism Test of the sk-A7110 and sk1 Mutants
We made a cross with a sk-A7110/SK-A7110 heterozygous plant as the female parent and sk1/sk1 as the male parent. The resulting progeny included silkless plants, with a 1:1 ratio of normal to mutant plants, indicating that sk-A7110 and sk1 are allelic and therefore are caused by mutations in the same gene. Indeed, previous positional cloning and transgenic analysis found that the SK1 gene encodes a UDP-glycosyltransferase (Hayward et al., 2016). The target genes of SK1 and Zm00001d002970 are identical, again confirming that Zm00001d002970 is the gene responsible for the sk-A7110 phenotype.
Discussion
During the early 20th century, many studies focused on ear and silk mutants in maize. The ts1 (Schmidt et al., 1993) and ts2 (DeLong et al., 1993) mutants are characterized by feminization of the male and female spikelets with multiple filaments. In the bd1 mutant, the ears are branched and lack florets and filaments; BD1 encodes an ERF transcription factor that regulates differentiation of the spikelet meristems into florets (Chuck et al., 2002). The female spikelets of silky-I (si1) have four filaments and the excess filaments are stamens in the upper florets that failed to abort (Fraser, 1933; Ambrose et al., 2000). The bearded-ear (bde) mutant has several small flowers in its spikelet and the ovules contain extra silks with lower fertility (Kempton, 1934; Thompson and Hake, 2009). Silkless1 (sk1), an important masculinized mutant, has tassel florets like those of WT but with aborted pistils in female spikelets, leading to the complete loss of silks (Jones, 1925). Among abnormal inflorescence maize mutants described to date, only sk1 lacks silks but exhibits no other mutant phenotype, indicating that SK1 plays a specific role in pistil development. Jones subsequently discovered several other filament-deficient mutants with anthers at the tops of ears, which together with sk1 are referred to as “sk” mutants (Jones, 1934). In the current study, we discovered the female-sterile mutant sk-A7110, a “sk”-type mutant (Figure 1A). Scanning electron microscopy showed that the pistils of sk-A7110 degenerate beginning at the late floret differentiation stage (Figures 2D,E,I,J), suggesting that SK-A7110 is essential for late-stage pistil development in maize.
Map-based cloning and allelism test revealed that sk-A7110 and sk1 are allelic mutants with mutations in a gene encoding a UDP-glycosyltransferase. The sk1-Allie1 mutant contains a novel 3549-bp insertion in the intron of SK1 (Hayward et al., 2016) and the sk-A7110 mutant contains an insertion of G at position 569 downstream of the translational start site, resulting in a frame shift and early translational termination (Figure 4D). Different allelic mutants can have some perceptible differences in phenotype due to their different mutation sites. For example, the sk1 mutant showed a complete absence of silks, whereas sk-A7110 not only showed a loss of silks, but also significantly reduced tassel branching (especially secondary branches) (Table 1). Therefore, discovering and analyzing different SK1 alleles can provide new information about the function of SK1 and the regulatory mechanism of pistil abortion in the maize inflorescence.
RNA-seq analysis showed that multiple genes associated with maize inflorescence development were differentially expressed in sk-A7110 vs. WT. Most of these DEGs are MADS-box family genes, AP2-EREBP, MYB, and bHLH transcription factors, and ZAG1, ZAG2, and BDE were the most distinct genes (Table 4). Many studies have proved that MADS-box and AP2-EREBP transcription factors play important roles in floral organ morphogenesis in maize and other plants (Irish and Sussex, 1990; Bowman et al., 1991; Hollick et al., 2005; Parkinson et al., 2007; Banks, 2008; Gallavotti et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012; Tanaka et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2017). MADS-box mutants, zag1 (Mena et al., 1996), zag2 (Schmidt et al., 1993) and bde1 (Thompson et al., 2009) exhibit abnormal inflorescence development, such as extra carpels emerging on female ears and pistils in the tassel that fail to abort. Reverse genetics studies have also suggested that MYB transcription factors play major roles in regulating floral organ development through a JA-mediated signaling pathway. For example, the Arabidopsis myb21 mutant is characterized by shorter filaments, less dehiscence of pollen sacs and lower viability of pollen grains compared to WT (Cheng et al., 2009). In addition, UB2 and UB3, which related to maize tassel branching were also significantly down-regulated in sk-A7110, and it is maybe the main reason for reduced tassel branching. So, our results demonstrate that SK-A7110 plays an important role in regulating maize inflorescence development in coordination with multiple genes.
In the current study, RNA-seq analysis revealed that most genes involved in the JA pathway are upregulated in sk-A7110 (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table S5). The contents of JA and JA-Ile were significantly higher in sk-A7110 ears than that in WT (Figure 7), which is consistent with the RNA-seq results. Meanwhile, analysis of sk1 indicated that SK1 affects JA accumulation and that ectopic expression of SK1 protects the pistils in tassels, thus leading to complete feminization, while the contents of JA and its direct precursor were significantly reduced in feminized tassels (Hayward et al., 2016). These results indicate that SK-A7110 plays an important role in JA metabolism during inflorescence development in maize and that JA and associated substances play an important role in determining the fate of maize pistils, with high JA levels promoting pistil abortion.
In addition, although the result of hormone measurement showed that the content of IAA and GA in ear of sk-A7110 was significantly lower than that in WT, we believe they were only the result caused by the undeveloped silks, not the cause of the mutant phenotype. Because it was found that in maize the development silks can produce high levels of GA (Dellaporta and Calderon-Urrea, 1994; Eveland et al., 2014), so when silks are not developed, the GA content in the ear decreased significantly compared to WT. And, filaments stop developing, with corresponding reduction in the content of IAA, which is closely related to growth and development. In addition, exogenous GA and IAA did not restore the mutant phenotype (results not shown). Therefore, combining the two results we make the speculation that the significant increase in JA content in the ear is the reason for the absence of silks in sk-A7110, while the decrease in IAA and GA content are the result of the absence of silks.
Glycosylation, which is catalyzed by glycosyltransferases, is an important way in which plants regulate hormone activity levels. For example, glycosylation of plant hormones is a major way in which plant hormones are inactivated, ultimately regulating plant growth and development through synergistic effects with glycosylation products (Wang, 2009). To date, a number of hormone-related glycosyltransferase genes have been cloned and identified, such as the IAA glycosyltransferase gene UGT73E2 (Tognetti et al., 2010), the cytokinin glycosyltransferase UGT76C1 (Wang et al., 2013), the ABA glycosyltransferase gene UGT71B6 (Priest et al., 2006), the brassinosteroid glycosyltransferase gene UGT73C6 (Husar et al., 2011) and the SA glycosyltransferase gene OsSGT1 (Umemura et al., 2009). Although a JA-independent glycosyltransferase has not yet been reported, JA was shown to interact with auxin to regulate plant growth and development (Grunewald et al., 2009). Song (2005) reported that the Arabidopsis auxin glycosyltransferase gene AtJGT1 glycosylates modified JA in vitro (Song, 2005), but whether this protein affects the dynamic balance of JA in plants remains unclear.
In our study, map-based cloning indicated that sk-A7110 encodes a UDP-glycosyltransferase, and GO-enrichment analysis showed that the significantly enriched GO terms of the DEGs are related to the transmembrane transport of substances. In addition, analysis of sk1 indicated that SK1 localizes to the peroxisome (Hayward et al., 2016). Therefore, we hypothesize that the glycosyltransferase encoded by SK-A7110 glycosylates JA and that it is active during its transmembrane transport from the peroxisome, thus maintaining the dynamic balance of JA within the pistil.
Author Contributions
BL designed the experiments. YaZ performed most of the experiments and analyzed the data. Other authors assisted in experiments and discussed the results. YaZ and YoZ wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0101803 to BL), Funds of Shandong improved variety Program (2016LZGC001 and 2017LZGC005 to BL),Shandong “Double Tops” Program (to BL) and the project (dxkt201707) from State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology.
Footnotes
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01227/full#supplementary-material
References
- Acosta I. F., Laparra H., Romero S. P., Schmelz E., Hamberg M., Mottinger J. P., et al. (2009). Tasselseed1 is a lipoxygenase affecting jasmonic acid signaling in sex determination of maize. Science 323 262–265. 10.1126/science.1164645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ambrose B. A., Lerner D. R., Ciceri P., Padilla C. M., Yanofsky M. F., Schmidt R. J. (2000). Molecular and genetic analyses of the silky1 gene reveal conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Mol. Cell. 5 569–579. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80450-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banks J. A. (2008). MicroRNA, sex determination and floral meristem determinacy in maize. Genome Biol. 9:204. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman J. L., Drews G. N., Meyerowitz E. M. (1991). Expression of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS is restricted to specific cell types late in flower development. Plant Cell 3 749–758. 10.1105/tpc.3.8.749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calderon-Urrea A., Dellaporta S. L. (1999). Cell death and cell protection genes determine the fate of pistils in maize. Development 126 435–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng H., Song S., Xiao L., Soo H. M., Cheng Z., Xie D., et al. (2009). Gibberellin acts through jasmonate to control the expression of MYB21, MYB24, and MYB57 to promote stamen filament growth in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000440. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng P. C., Greyson R. I., Walden D. B. (1983). Organ Initiation and the development of unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays. Am. J. Bot. 70 450–462. 10.2307/2443252 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chuck G. (2010). Molecular mechanisms of sex determination in monoecious and dioecious plants. Adv. Botan. Res. 54 53–83. 10.1016/S0065-2296(10)54002-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chuck G., Meeley R., Irish E., Sakai H., Hake S. (2007). The maize tasselseed4 microRNA controls sex determination and meristem cell fate by targeting Tasselseed6/indeterminate spikelet1. Nat. Genet. 39 1517–1521. 10.1038/ng.2007.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chuck G., Muszynski M., Kellogg E., Hake S., Schmidt R. J. (2002). The control of spikelet meristem identity by the branched silkless1 gene in maize. Science 298 1238–1241. 10.1126/science.1076920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chuck G. S., Brown P. J., Meeley R., Hake S. (2014). Maize SBP-box transcription factors unbranched2 and unbranched3 affect yield traits by regulating the rate of lateral primordia initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 18775–18780. 10.1073/pnas.1407401112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dellaporta S. L., Calderon-Urrea A. (1994). The sex determination process in maize. Science (New York, N.Y.) 266 1501–1505. 10.1126/science.7985019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeLong A., Calderon-Urrea A., Dellaporta S. L. (1993). Sex determination gene TASSELSEED2 of maize encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion. Cell 74 757–768. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90522-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du Y., Liu L., Li M., Fang S., Shen X., Chu J., et al. (2017). UNBRANCHED3 regulates branching by modulating cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling in maize and rice. New Phytol. 214 721–733. 10.1111/nph.14391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eveland A. L., Goldshmidt A., Pautler M., Morohashi K., LiseronMonfils C., Lewis M. W., et al. (2014). Regulatory modules controlling maize inflorescence architecture. Genome Res. 24 431–444. 10.1101/gr.166397.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraser A. C. (1933). Heritable characters of maize – XLIV – Silky ears. J. Hered. 24 41–46. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103670 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gallavotti A., Long J. A., Stanfield S., Yang X., Jackson D., Vollbrecht E., et al. (2010). The control of axillary meristem fate in the maize ramosa pathway. Development 137 2849–2856. 10.1242/dev.051748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grunewald W., Vanholme B., Pauwels L., Plovie E., Inzé D., Gheysen G., et al. (2009). Expression of the Arabidopsis jasmonate signalling repressor JAZ1/TIFY10A is stimulated by auxin. EMBO Rep. 10 923–928. 10.1038/embor.2009.103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwig T., Corvalan C., Best N. B., Budka J. S., Zhu J. Y., Choe S., et al. (2012). Propiconazole is a specific and accessible brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis inhibitor for Arabidopsis and maize. PLoS One 7:e36625. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayward A. P., Moreno M. A., Howard T. P., III, Hague J., Nelson K., Heffelfinger C., et al. (2016). Control of sexuality by the sk1-encoded UDP-glycosyltransferase of maize. Sci. Adv. 2:e1600991. 10.1126/sciadv.1600991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollick J. B., Kermicle J. L., Parkinson S. E. (2005). Rmr6 maintains meiotic inheritance of paramutant states in Zea mays. Genetics 171 725–740. 10.1534/genetics.105.045260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hultquist J. F., Dorweiler J. E. (2008). Feminized tassels of maize mop1 and ts1 mutants exhibit altered levels of miR156 and specific SBP-box genes. Planta 229 99–113. 10.1007/s00425-008-0813-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husar S., Berthiller F., Fujioka S., Rozhon W., Khan M., Kalaivanan F., et al. (2011). Overexpression of the UGT73C6 alters brassinosteroid glucoside formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 11:51. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irish V. F., Sussex I. M. (1990). Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell 2 741–753. 10.1105/tpc.2.8.741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones D. F. (1925). Heritable characters of maize. J. Hered. 16 339–342. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a102629 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jones D. F. (1934). Unisexual maize plants and their bearing on sex differentiation in other plants and in animals. Genetics 19 552–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa M., Araki M., Goto S., Hattori M., Hirakawa M., Itoh M., et al. (2008). KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 D480–D484. 10.1093/nar/gkm882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kempton J. H. (1934). Heritable characters in maize: XLVII–branched silkless. J. Hered. 25 29–32. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103836 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Z., Xu J., Li W., Zhang L., Cui J., He Q., et al. (2017). Transcriptomic analysis reveals mechanisms of sterile and fertile flower differentiation and development in Viburnum macrocephalum f. keteleeri. Front. Plant Sci. 8:261. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McSteen P., Malcomber S., Skirpan A., Lunde C., Wu X., Kellogg E., et al. (2007). barren inflorescence2 encodes a co-ortholog of the PINOID serine/threonine kinase and is required for organogenesis during inflorescence and vegetative development in maize. Plant Physiol. 144 1000–1011. 10.1104/pp.107.098558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mena M., Ambrose B. A., Meeley R. B., Briggs S. P., Yanofsky M. F., Schmidt R. J. (1996). Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science 274 1537–1540. 10.1126/science.274.5292.1537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkinson S. E., Gross S. M., Hollick J. B. (2007). Maize sex determination and abaxial leaf fates are canalized by a factor that maintains repressed epigenetic states. Dev. Biol. 308 462–473. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Priest D. M., Ambrose S. J., Vaistij F. E., Elias L., Higgins G. S., Ross A. R., et al. (2006). Use of the glucosyltransferase UGT71B6 to disturb abscisic acid homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 46 492–502. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02701.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt R. J., Veit B., Mandel M. A., Mena M., Hake S., Yanofsky M. F. (1993). Identification and molecular characterization of ZAG1, the maize homolog of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene agamous. Plant Cell 5 729–737. 10.1105/tpc.5.7.729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song J. T. (2005). Biochemical characterization of an Arabidopsis glucosyltransferase with high activity toward Jasmonic acid. J. Plant Biol. 48 422–428. 10.1007/BF03030584 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stitz M., Gase K., Baldwin I. T., Gaquerel E. (2011). Ectopic expression of AtJMT in Nicotiana attenuata: creating a metabolic sink has tissue-specific consequences for the jasmonate metabolic network and silences downstream gene expression. Plant Physiol. 157 341–354. 10.1104/pp.111.178582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka W., Pautler M., Jackson D., Hirano H. Y. (2013). Grass meristems II: inflorescence architecture, flower development and meristem fate. Plant Cell Physiol. 54 313–324. 10.1093/pcp/pct016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson B. E., Bartling L., Whipple C., Hall D. H., Sakai H., Schmidt R., et al. (2009). Bearded-ear encodes a MADS box transcription factor critical for maize floral development. Plant Cell 21 2578–2590. 10.1105/tpc.109.067751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson B. E., Hake S. (2009). Bearded-ear encodes a MADS box transcription factor critical for maize floral development. Plant Cell 21 2578–2590. 10.1105/tpc.109.067751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tognetti V. B., Van Aken O., Morreel K., Vandenbroucke K., van de Cotte B., De Clercq I., et al. (2010). Perturbation of indole-3-butyric acid homeostasis by the UDP-glucosyltransferase UGT74E2 modulates Arabidopsis architecture and water stress tolerance. Plant Cell 22 2660–2679. 10.1105/tpc.109.071316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Umemura K., Satou J., Iwata M., Uozumi N., Koga J., Kawano T., et al. (2009). Contribution of salicylic acid glucosyltransferase, OsSGT1, to chemically induced disease resistance in rice plants. Plant J. 57 463–472. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03697.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Ma X. M., Kojima M., Sakakibara H., Hou B. K. (2013). Glucosyltransferase UGT76C1 finely modulates cytokinin responses via cytokinin N-glucosylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 65 9–16. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X. (2009). Structure, mechanism and engineering of plant natural product glycosyltransferases. FEBS Lett. 583 3303–3309. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.09.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young M. D., Wakefield M. J., Smyth G. K., Oshlack A. (2010). Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11:R14. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young T. E., Geisler-Lee J., Gallie D. R. (2004). Senescence-induced expression of cytokinin reverses pistil abortion during maize flower development. Plant J. 38 910–922. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02093.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Li H., Zhang D., Liu Y., Fu J., Shi Y., et al. (2012). Characterization and expression analysis of six MADS-box genes in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Plant Physiol. 169 797–806. 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.