Skip to main content
VirusDisease logoLink to VirusDisease
. 2018 Jun 7;29(3):316–323. doi: 10.1007/s13337-018-0461-5

Genetic diversity and biological characterization of sugarcane streak mosaic virus isolates from Iran

Zohreh Moradi 1, Mohsen Mehrvar 1,, Ehsan Nazifi 2
PMCID: PMC6111955  PMID: 30159366

Abstract

Sugarcane streak mosaic virus (SCSMV; genus Poacevirus, family Potyviridae) is a major causal agent of sugarcane mosaic disease in Asia. A survey of SCSMV was conducted in cultivated fields in Khuzestan province, southwestern Iran. Sixty-five sugarcane leaf samples showing mosaic symptoms were collected and investigated by RT-PCR. Almost one-fourth of the samples were found to be infected by SCSMV. To verify molecular variability, 12 SCSMV isolates were sequenced and analyzed by comparing partial NIb–CP gene sequences. The nucleotide identity among Iranian isolates was 83.1–99.8%, indicating high nucleotide variability, while amino acid identity was 95.2–100%, which suggesting selection for amino acid conservation. They shared nucleotide identities of 76.2–99.1% with those of other SCSMV isolates available in GenBank, the highest with isolates from Pakistan (PAK), India (IND671) and China (M117, KT257289). Further analysis was conducted based on complete CI coding region to gain more insight into the phylogenetic relationships of Iranian SCSMV compared to those from other Asian countries. Iranian isolates shared identities of 79.8–89.0% (nucleotide) and 94.8–98.6% (amino acid) with those from other geographical regions in the CI gene. The highest nucleotide identity of Iranian isolates was with isolates PAK (Pakistan), M121 (JQ975096, China) and IND671 (India), respectively. The phylogenetic trees (based on CI and NIb–CP) revealed the segregation of SCSMV isolates into two major divergent evolutionary lineages that reflect geographical origin of the isolates (with minor exception). Phylogenetic analyses grouped Iranian SCSMV isolates together with isolates from Pakistan, India and just one Chinese isolate in group II. Biological results showed that Iranian SCSMV isolates infect sugarcane, sorghum, maize and some wild grasses, causing mosaic symptoms on the leaves.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13337-018-0461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Genetic diversity, Iran, Phylogenetic analysis, Sugarcane streak mosaic virus, Sugarcane

Introduction

Sugarcane is reported to be affected by several viral diseases, of which sugarcane mosaic disease (SMD) is most widely spread [9, 28]. This disease is commonly associated with strains of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV, Potyvirus), Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV, Potyvirus) and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus (SCSMV, Poacevirus) in the family Potyviridae [30, 31, 42, 43]. SCSMV is an important viral pathogen affecting sugarcane yield, widely prevalent in most of the Asian countries [2, 29, 40]. It can be transmitted mechanically, and no insect vector has yet been reported for the virus [15, 17, 43]. SCSMV has flexuous filamentous particles (890 × 15 nm) which encapsidate a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome of about 10 kb [13]. The genomic RNA of SCSMV contains single open reading frame (ORF) which encodes a large polyprotein that is autocatalytically cleaved into at least ten mature proteins: P1, HC-Pro, P3, 6K1, CI, 6K2, VPg, NIa-Pro, NIb and CP [19, 36, 43]. Like other members of the family Potyviridae, an additional protein (pretty interesting Potyviridae ORF, PIPO) was also predicted to be expressed as a fusion protein with the N-terminal part of P3 (P3N-PIPO) via ribosomal frameshifting or transcriptional slippage [5]. SCSMV was detected for the first time in 1998 from quarantined sugarcane germplasm imported from Pakistan into the USA [10]. Subsequently it was detected in most of the sugarcane growing Asian countries including Iran [4, 6, 10, 12, 19, 22, 25, 29]. Sugarcane is one of the most important strategic industrial crops in Iran, covering approximately 94.000 ha of land areas with an average yield of 90 tonnes of cane per ha [7]. It is cultivated mainly in Khuzestan province, southwest of Iran. SCSMV is known to be one of the causative agents of sugarcane mosaic disease in Iran [22, 25]. Thus, understanding the genetic diversity of SCSMV is helpful to develop a reliable diagnosis and management strategies for SMD. The present study was carried out to investigate the partial prevalence and genetic diversity of SCSMV isolates in Iran. Therefore, the molecular variability in the partial NIb–CP region sequences of 17 Iranian isolates of SCSMV (12 isolates of this study plus five isolates deposited in the GenBank previously) were analyzed and compared with sequences from other parts of the world available in the GenBank. The nucleotide sequences of the genomic portion spanning the C-terminal part of NIb and N-terminal part of CP coding regions were used for genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis as more sequence of this region was available in the GenBank. In addition to this, the N-terminal part of the CP is the most variable region, commonly used as a molecular marker for differentiating the isolates in members of the family Potyviridae and other plant viruses [12, 32, 38]. Consequently, sequence variability of the CP gene would increase the statistical power for analysis of the SCSMV population diversity. Further, the complete cylindrical inclusion (CI) nucleotide sequences of two isolates were obtained to understand more details of the exact phylogenetic position of Iranian SCSMV. Comparisons using the CI-coding region is most accurately reflected those for the complete ORF and this region would therefore be the best for diagnostic and taxonomic purposes if only a sub-portion of the genome were sequenced [1]. Furthermore, to have a clear view of the biological properties of Iranian SCSMV, the host range of the virus was also investigated.

Materials and methods

Virus isolates, RT-PCR, cloning and sequencing

During August to October 2014 and 2015, 65 sugarcane leaf samples exhibiting mosaic and streaking symptoms were collected from the major growing region of sugarcane in Iran, Khuzestan province. Collected samples were chosen from common sugarcane cultivars: CP48-103, CP57-614, CP69-1062, CP63-588 and CP78-1628. Total RNA was extracted from the samples using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and used as template for reverse transcription test. RT-PCR analysis was performed by use of specific primer pair SCSMV-F (5′-GGCAAGTYGAGTAYATGTCGCA-3′) and SCSMV-R (5′-GTGGTGTGTAYCTCATCATCTGC-3′) [22], which amplify 570 bp from the NIb and CP gene sequences. Synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed using antisense primer and the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMuLV) reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For this, 4 microliters (μl) of purified RNA was mixed with two μl of antisense primer (10 pmol), heated at 65 °C for 5 min and chilled on ice. The mixture was added to reverse transcription mix (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothritol, 1 mM of each dNTP, 200 units of MMuLV-RT) in a final volume of 20 μl and incubated at 42 °C for 60 min. PCR was carried out using Taq PCR Master Mix (Ampliqon, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR thermal profile was 94 °C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 62 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 10 min as a final extension after the last cycle. Tow positive samples were randomly selected and the CI coding regions of them were amplified using specific primers pairs described by Parameswari et al. [29] in RT-PCR method. PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel and purified from the gel using the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The purified PCR products were ligated into pTZ57R/T vector (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. After the recombinant vectors were transformed into competent cells of Escherichia coli DH5α, the positive clones were screened by colony-PCR with M13-forward and reverse primers. Plasmid DNA from recombinant clones was purified using a Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and the purified recombinant plasmids were bi-directionally sequenced (Macrogen Inc., South Korea). Consensus sequences were verified using the BLAST program in NCBI database.

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis

To investigate phylogenetic relationships among SCSMV isolates, sequence subsets consisting of NIb–CP and CI gene sequences of the all SCSMV isolates (Table S1) were analyzed separately. The aligned sequences for CI and partial NIb–CP regions were 1968 and 570 nucleotides long, respectively. The pairwise nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) sequence identity scores were represented as color-coded blocks using SDT v.1.2 software [26]. Phylogenetic trees were inferred by the maximum-likelihood (ML) method implemented in MEGA6 [35], with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The genetic distances of intra- and inter-clusters were computed using MEGA6 with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Biological characteristics of the Iranian SCSMV

The partial host range of the one Iranian SCSMV isolate (IR-Khuz6a) was investigated by mechanical inoculation to a variety of hosts. For this purpose, the sugarcane leaf infected with IR-Khuz6a was homogenized in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm/min for 2 min. The supernatant was mechanically inoculated onto carborandum-dusted leaves of 32 plant species/cultivars belong to five families: Gramineae (or Poaceae) (16), Solanaceae (7), Leguminosae (4) Chenopodiaceae (2) and Cucurbitaceae (3) (Table S2) at the stage of two to three leaves. At least, six plants of each species or cultivar were mechanically inoculated and two left uninoculated as controls. Inoculated plants were kept in an insect-proof greenhouse at 23–25 °C with supplementary lighting (18 h photoperiod). Observation of symptom was conducted at 3 weeks after inoculation and the presence of the virus was assayed using RT-PCR.

Results

Sequence determination and data analysis

17 samples (26.1%) were found to be infected with SCSMV by RT-PCR amplification using primers amplifying the partial NIb–CP coding region. The partial NIb–CP sequences of 12 SCSMV isolates were determined, analyzed and deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers MF580141–MF580152). In ddition, the full-length CI coding regions of two isolates were deposited to GenBank and allocated the accession numbers of MF579612 and MF579613 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sources and GenBank accession numbers of Iranian Sugarcane streak mosaic virus isolates reported in this study

Isolate Source Accession number Genomic region
IR-Khuz6a Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580141 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz8 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580142 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz9 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580143 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz12 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580144 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz13 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580145 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz15 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580146 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz25 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580147 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz27 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580148 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz30 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580149 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz45 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580150 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz57a Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580151 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz65 Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF580152 Partial NIb–CP
IR-Khuz6a Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF579612 Complete CI
IR-Khuz57a Sugarcane (Iran, Khuzestan) MF579613 Complete CI

Sequence comparisons

The pairwise sequence identity of partial NIb–CP genes among all 39 SCSMV isolates (12 from this study and 27 from GenBank) ranged from 76.2 to 99.8% at the nt sequence level (Fig. 1) and from 84.5 to 100% at the aa sequence level (data not shown). Comparative sequence analysis of Iranian isolates revealed 83.1–99.8% nt sequence identity among them, indicating a high nt variability. The nt sequence identity scores between Iranian and GenBank SCSMV isolates ranged between 76.2% (between isolates IR-Khuz8, Kh3 [KR868693] and MYA-Formosa [KJ187049]) and 99.1% (between isolates IR-Khuz13 and M117 [KT257289]) (Fig. 1). In the deduced aa sequences, Iranian isolates shared 95.2–100% identity among themselves and 87.7–100% with the SCSMV isolates from other countries. High nt differences and low aa differences between the Iranian isolates indicate that selection for aa conservation. Compared with other isolates, the lowest aa identity (87.7%) was observed between isolates IR-Khuz6a, IR-Khuz30 and Andhra Pradesh (Y17738, India) and the highest (100%) was between IR-Khuz27 and PAK (NC_014037, Pakistan) as well as between IR-Khuz13 and M117 (KT257289, China). Isolate IR-Khuz45 exhibited the highest nt identity (98.2%) to that of Indian isolate IND671; Isolates IR-Khuz6a, IR-Khuz57a, IR-Khuz8, IR-Khuz30, IR-Khuz25, IR-Khuz27, Kh3 and Kh39 were more identical to the Pakistani isolate PAK (with 94.0–96.8% nt identity); while Isolates IR-Khuz15, IR-Khuz9, IR-Khuz65, IR-Khuz13, IR-Khuz12, Kh33, Kh34 and Kh36 were more resemble to Chinese isolate M117 (KT257289) (with 92.5–99.1% nt identity) (Fig. 1). The identities between the complete CI coding region of all SCSMV isolates were from 78.9 to 100% at nt level (Fig. 2) and from 94.8 to 100% at aa level (data not shown). SCSMV-IR-Khuz6 and IR-Khuz57 CI coding region sequences were 97.9 and 98.8% identical at nt and aa levels, respectively. The CI coding region of IR-Khuz6a and IR-Khuz57a shared nt identities of 79.8–89.0% with those of 46 other SCSMV isolates available in the GenBank, the highest with the isolate PAK (respectively 89.0 and 88.0%), and the lowest with isolate THA-NP3 (JN163911, Thailand) (respectively 79.8 and 80.4%) (Fig. 1). At aa level, IR-Khuz6a and IR-Khuz57a showed the highest identities (98.6 and 98.0%) with isolate M121 (JQ975096, China) and the lowest (95.7 and 94.8%) with isolate M111 (KT257238, China). Due to lack of availablity of CI gene of M117 (KT257289) and NIb–CP gene sequences of M121 (JQ975096) in GenBank, they were not included in each of relevant analysis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed based on partial NIb–CP aligned nucleotide sequences of SCSMV isolates from this study (marked) and their counterparts in the GenBank database from other parts of the world. The phylogenetic tree was generated in MEGA6. A Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV) isolate (accession no. NC_012799) was used as outgroup. Isolates are indicated in the trees by accession number/isolate name/geographical origin of collection. Bootstrap values (1000 replicates) are shown at the branch internodes. Bootstrap support values equal or greater than 50% are indicated above the nodes. Two dimensional nucleotide diversity plot constructed based on SDT MUSCLE alignment

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree calculated from the complete cylindrical inclusion (CI) gene nucleotide sequences of 48 SCSMV isolates (two from this study and 46 from the GenBank database), and graphical representation of pairwise nucleotide identity (with percentage identity scale). Tree was constructed by MEGA6. A Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV) isolate (accession no. NC_012799) was used as outgroup. The isolates obtained in this study are indicated by “black triangle’’. The GenBank accession number, the name of each isolate and its country of origin are listed. Numbers at each node indicate bootstrap percentages based on 1000 replications. Values are shown only when the values are equal or greater than 50%. The graphical representation of pairwise identities is based on SDT MUSCLE alignment and the colour table on the right describes the percentage identity that each colour represents

Phylogenetic analysis of SCSMV isolates

The SCSMV CI and partial NIb–CP region sequences were subjected to phylogenetic analyses, with those of Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV) (representing the nearest species) isolate (NC_012799) as outgroup. The NIb–CP phylogenetic tree revealed the segregation of SCSMV isolates into two divergent evolutionary lineages. These two major clades, designated as I and II clades, including 18 and 21 isolates, respectively (Table S1 and Fig. 1). Members of each group were further divided into two subgroups: A, B. Group I consisted of most of Chinese isolates plus isolates from Japan, Indonesia, Thailand, Myanmar and India. The TPT isolate from India, form a separate subgroup in this group. The isolates in group I shared within-group identities of 93.7–99.8 and 94.7–100% at nt and aa level, respectively (Fig. 1). All of the isolates from Iran together with two isolates from India (IND671, AP1), and one isolate from China (M117) and Pakistan (PAK) fell into group II, indicating that most isolates of this group has been distributed in South and Southwestern Asia (with the exception of a Chinese isolate M117). These isolates shared within-group identities of 79.9–99.8 and 88.3–100% at nt and aa level, respectively (Fig. 1). Of seventeen isolates from Iran, eight were clustered with members of the subgroup IIA, and nine were clustered with the members of subgroup IIB (Fig. 1). The genetic distance among 17 Iranian SCSMV isolates was 0.091 ± 0.008, indicating a high nt variability in this region. The mean dN/dS ratio for Iranian isolates was 0.886 (dN/dS ratios < 1), indicating most of nt substitutions were silent, encoding the same amino acid (results not shown), demonstrating purifying selection. The overall mean value of nt sequence diversity was 0.172 ± 0.005. The genetic distance within group II was high (0.101 ± 0.009), indicating that the isolates in this group were genetically divergent. On the contrary, the genetic distance within group I was low (0.033 ± 0.003). The between-group genetic distances of the two groups (0.268 ± 0.018) were significantly higher than the within-group ones, suggesting that the phylogenetic clustering results of these isolates were reasonable. A similar phylogenetic tree was obtained from an alignment of the translated aa sequences of the same isolates. Such results were consistent with similarity plot analysis (data not shown). Additionally, phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length CI nt sequences obtained in this study (Table 1) with representative sequences present in the GenBank (Table S1 and Fig. 2). Sequence analysis based on the CI region revealed the existence of two distinct phylogroups similar to the NIb–CP phylogenetic tree. Group I consisted of 43 SCSMV isolates from sugarcane in China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Thailand and Myanmar in which MYA-Formosa isolate, form a separate sublineage (IB). The isolates in group I shared within-group identities of 96.1–100 and 98.2–100% at nt and aa level, respectively (Fig. 2). Group II included five isolates from Iran, Pakistan (PAK), India (IND671) and China (M121) among which Iranian isolates formed separate subgroup (IIA). These isolates shared within-group identities of 85.9–97.9 and 97.6–98.9% at nt and aa level, respectively (Fig. 2). The overall mean distance was 0.065 ± 0.013 for the CI gene sequences. The genetic distances within group II was high (0.129 ± 0.019), indicating that the isolates in this group were the most genetically divergent. On the contrary, the genetic distance within group I was low (0.021 ± 0.001). The between-group genetic distance of the two groups (0.249 ± 0.021) was significantly higher than the within-group ones, confirming the phylogenetic grouping. These results were further supported by the amino acid phylogenetic tree and pairwise sequence distances (data not shown). As shown in the phylogenetic trees (Figs. 1, 2), either in the NIb–CP-based tree or the CI-based tree, the majority of SCSMV isolates are arranged within the two clades according to their country of origin.

Biological characteristics

The results of inoculation of the tested plants by Iranian SCSMV are listed in Table S2. Biological results showed that Iranian SCSMV could infect sugarcane, sorghum, maize and some wild grasses, such as Sorghum bicolor ssp. drummondii, Sorghum halepense, Pennisetum glaucum, Digitaria sanguinalis, Rottboellia exaltata and Dactyloctenium aegyptium. Most of the infected plants showed mosaic symptoms in the form of interveinal chlorotic streaks or stripes on the leaves. However, SCSMV was detected on Dactyloctenium aegyptium by RT-PCR without specific symptom (data not shown). The wild grasses infected by SCSMV are potentially the natural hosts of the virus in the field and thus could become the place for virus survival and reservoir.

Discussion

Sugarcane is one of the most economically important crops in Iran which has an important role in sugar industry. Mosaic is one of the most extensively distributed diseases of sugarcane and has been reported in almost all of the major sugarcane-producing countries. It has been reported that three viruses, SCMV, SrMV and SCSMV naturally cause sugarcane mosaic in the field [30, 42, 43]. According to previous study, the sugarcane varieties under cultivation in Iran are widely infected with SCMV as evidenced by about 92% infection in surveyed samples [24]. However, according to results of this study, SCSMV is not widespread in sugarcane fields of Khuzestan province, the major sugarcane-growing region of Iran, probably due to lack of vector transmission or other unknown reasons. To evaluate molecular variability and phylogenetic relationships of Iranian SCSMV isolates to those from other Asian countries, two datasets were analyzed using the partial NIb–CP and CI coding regions individually. Pairwise comparisons and phylogenetic analysis clearly showed the existence of two groups in concordance with previously reports [11, 20]. According to genetic differentiation and phylogenetic analysis of full-length CI sequences, group I consisted of isolates that originated from East Asia (China and Japan) and Southeast Asia (Myanmar, Indonesia and Thailand), except the TPT which was isolated from India, while group II consisted of isolates that originated from Southwest Asia (Iran) and South Asia (India and Pakistan), except Chinese isolate M121 (JQ975096). This suggests that the majority of SCSMV isolates are divided into two major groups corresponding to their geographical situation, in consistent with previous findings [20]. The CI gene nt sequences of Iranian isolates were more identical to the Pakistani isolate PAK followed by a Chinese isolate M121 (JQ975096) and an Indian isolate IND671 (JN941985), respectively. Howere, they shared the highest aa identities respectively with isolates M121 (JQ975096), IND671 and PAK in the CI gene. In the NIb–CP-based tree, the majority of SCSMV isolates were also arranged within the two clades according to their country of origin. Nevertheless, one of the Chinese isolates (M117, KT257289) and two of the Indian isolates (TPT and Andhra Pradesh) were clustered within the group II and group I clade, respectively. The possibility to explain similarities of geographically distant SCSMV isolates is the movement and exchange of germplasm. SCSMV showed a spatial distribution pattern with a greater genetic distance in the Southwest (Iran) or South (India and Pakistan) Asian group than in the subpopulation composed of isolates from East (China and Japan) or Southeast (Thailand, Indonesia and Myanmar) Asia [12, 20]. The higher genetic diversity observed between groups than within groups of SCSMV populations suggests that there is more frequent gene flow within groups than between groups. Transmission characteristics of the virus and the existence of physical and quarantine barriers between Asian countries may explain the SCSMV population pattern [12, 20]. The value of nucleotide diversity (π) was 0.091 ± 0.0078 for partial NIb–CP regions of Iranian SCSMV isolates, implying important variability within isolates. Iranian isolates were more resemble to Pakistani (PAK), Indian (IND671) and Chinese (M117) isolates in partial NIb–CP. This suggests that there are different SCSMV strains or isolates infecting sugarcane in Iran. As SCSMV can be transmitted through vegetative sett, it seems that during commercial exchanges, Iranian isolates have been introduced into the country from sugarcane-producing Asian countries such as India, Pakistan and China via contaminated vegetative cuttings. Particularly from India as it has been proposed that SCSMV has probably been originated from northern India and spread to most of sugarcane growing Asian countries via infected sugarcane germplasm materials [12, 20]. The results presented here advance our understanding of the molecular variability of SCSMV Iranian isolates infecting sugarcane. SCSMV is frequently found in mixed infection along with SCMV and or SrMV [21, 3942]. Sugarcane mosaic disease in Iran is reported to be caused by SCMV, SCSMV or IJMV (Iranian johnsongrass mosaic virus) lonely or in combinations [23, 24]. Mixed infection of sugarcane by two or more viruses leads to development of complex diseases and consequent difficulty in identifying the components of the disease complex. On the other hand, the possibility of recombination between the two species cannot be ruled out when a mixed infection takes place on the same sugarcane leaf [3, 8, 18, 34]. Recombination plays a significant role in increasing plant virus variability and adaptation to new hosts and may lead to emergence of new variants and resistance-breaking strains [27, 37]. The host range test using mechanical inoculation indicated that in addition to sugarcane SCSMV infects other cultivated plants like sorghum, maize and some weed grasses (Table S2). These observations are in agreement with the results reported by Damayanti and Putra [6], Hema et al. [14], Jensen [16], Singh and Rao [33] and Xu et al. [43]. In some plantations in Iran, maize is often planted close to sugarcane crops and weed grasses such as Rottboellia exaltata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Sorghum halepense are commonly found in sugarcane fields. These plants could be as alternative hosts of SCSMV and thus serve as potential reservoirs of the virus in the field and contribute to its off-season survival. Therefore, avoidance of maize cultivation near sugarcane crops and control of those weeds are useful strategies for controlling of the disease [6]. This information provided an insight on the population structure and genetic diversity of SCSMV isolates from Iran that would be subsequently useful in epidemiological studies, breeding of resistant varieties and designing effective control strategies. Further studies are required to assess relative proportion of each viruses causing sugarcane mosaic as well as studying economic losses caused by mixed infection of either virus in sugarcane. Such additional information can help in the development and adoption of preventive control measures.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

References

  • 1.Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Fauquet CM. Molecular criteria for genus and species discrimination within the family Potyviridae. Arch Virol. 2005;150:459–479. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0440-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bagyalakshmi K, Parameswari B, Chinnaraja C, Karuppaiah R, Ganesh KV. Viswanathan. Genetic variability and potential recombination events in the HC-Pro gene of Sugarcane steak mosaic virus. Arch Virol. 2012;157:1371–1375. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chare ER, Holmes EC. A phylogenetic survey of recombination frequency in plant RNA viruses. Arch Virol. 2006;151:933–946. doi: 10.1007/s00705-005-0675-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chatenet M, Mazarin C, Girard JC, Fernandez E, Gargani D, Rao GP, Royer M, Lockhart B, Rott P. Detection of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in sugarcane from several Asian countries. Proc Int Soc Sugarcane Technol. 2005;25:656–662. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chung BY-W, Miller WA, Atkins JF, Firth AE. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5897–5902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800468105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Damayanti TA, Putra LK. First occurrence of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus infecting sugarcane in Indonesia. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2011;77:72–74. doi: 10.1007/s10327-010-0285-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.FAO. FAOSTAT-agriculture, production statistics, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations statistical databases. 2014. Web: http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed 15 May 2016
  • 8.Gell G, Sebestyén E, Balázs E. Recombination analysis of Maize dwarf mosaic virus [MDMV] in the Sugarcane mosaic virus [SCMV] subgroup of potyviruses. Virus Genes. 2014;50:79–86. doi: 10.1007/s11262-014-1142-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grisham MP. Mosaic. In: Rott P, Bailey RA, Comstock JC, Croft BJ, Saumtally AS, editors. A guide to sugarcane diseases. Montepellier: CIRAD-ISSCT, CIRAD publication Services; 2000. pp. 249–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hall JS, Adams B, Parsons TJ, French R, Lane LC, Jensen SG. Molecular cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic relationships of a new potyvirus: Sugarcane streak mosaic virus, and a reevaluation of the classification of the Potyviridae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998;10:323–332. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.He Z, Li W, Yasaka R, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Ohshimam K, Li S. Molecular variability of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in China based on an analysis of the P1 and CP protein coding regions. Arch Virol. 2014;159:1149–1154. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1854-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.He Z, Yasaka R, Li W, Li S, Ohshima K. Genetic structure of populations of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in China: comparison with the populations in India. Virus Res. 2016;211:103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hema M, Joseph J, Gopinath K, Sreenivasulu P, Savithri HS. Molecular characterization and interviral relationships of a flexuous filamentous virus causing mosaic disease of sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum L.] in India. Arch Virol. 1999;144:479–490. doi: 10.1007/s007050050519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hema M, Savithri HS, Sreenivasulu P. Sugarcane streak mosaic virus: occurrence, purification characterization and detection. In: Rao GP, Ford RE, Tosic M, Teakle DS, editors. Sugarcane pathology. Enfield: Virus and phytoplasma disease Science Publishers; 2001. pp. 37–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hema M, Sreenivasulu P, Savithri HS. Taxonomic position of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in the family Potyviridae. Arch Virol. 2002;147:1997–2007. doi: 10.1007/s00705-002-0851-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jensen SG, Hall JS. Identification of a new sorghum infecting species of potyvirus from sugarcane. [Abs.] Phytopathology. 1993;83:884. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2012. p. 1327. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lai MMC. RNA recombination in animal and plant viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:61–79. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.61-79.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li WF, He Z, Li SF, Huang YK, Zhang ZX, Jiang D, Wang X, Luo Z. Molecular characterization of a new strain of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus [SCSMV] Arch Virol. 2011;156:2101–2104. doi: 10.1007/s00705-011-1090-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liang SS, Alabi OJ, Damaj MB, Fu WL, Sun SR, Fu HY, Chen RK, Mirkov TE, Gao SJ. Genomic variability and molecular evolution of Asian isolates of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus. Arch Virol. 2016;161:1493–1503. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-2810-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luo Q, Ahmad K, Fu HY, Wang JD, Chen RK, Gao SJ. Genetic diversity and population structure of Sorghum mosaic virus infecting Saccharum spp. hybrids. Ann Appl Biol. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moradi N, Rajabi-Memari H, Mehrabi-Koushki M, Taherkhani K, Moazzen-Reza-Mahalle H, Sheikhi F, Nasirpour N, Sanjabifard Z. First report of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in Iran. New Dis Rep. 2015;32:2. doi: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2015.032.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moradi Z, Mehrvar M, Nazifi E, Zakiaghl M. Iranian johnsongrass mosaic virus: the complete genome sequence, molecular and biological characterization, and comparison of coat protein gene sequences. Virus Genes. 2017;53:77–88. doi: 10.1007/s11262-016-1389-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moradi Z, Nazifi E, Mehrvar M. Occurrence and evolutionary analysis of coat protein gene sequences of Iranian isolates of Sugarcane mosaic virus. Plant Pathol J. 2017;33:296–306. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.10.2016.0219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moradi Z, Nazifi E, Mehrvar M. Molecular characterization of two Sugarcane streak mosaic virus isolates from Iran with emphasis on its population structure. Acta Virol. 2017;61:428–437. doi: 10.4149/av_2017_404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muhire BM, Varsani A, Martin DP. SDT: a virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nagy PD. Recombination in plant RNAviruses. In: Roossinck MJ, editor. Plant virus evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2008. pp. 133–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Padhi A, Ramu K. Genomic evidence of intraspecific recombination in Sugarcane mosaic virus. Virus Genes. 2011;42:282–285. doi: 10.1007/s11262-010-0564-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parameswari B, Bagyalakshmi K, Viswanathan R, Chinnaraja C. Molecular characterization of Indian Sugarcane streak mosaic virus isolate. Virus Genes. 2013;46:186–189. doi: 10.1007/s11262-012-0827-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Perera MF, Filippone MP, Ramallo CJ, Cuenya MI, García ML, Ploper LD, Castagnaro AP. Genetic diversity among viruses associated with sugarcane mosaic disease in Tucumán, Argentina. Phytopathology. 2009;99:38–49. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-1-0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rao GP, Chatenet M, Girard JG, Rott P. Distribution of Sugarcane mosaic and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus in India. Sugar Tech. 2006;8:79–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02943747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rybicki EP, Shukla DD. Coat protein phylogeny and systematics of potyviruses. Arch Virol. 1992;5:139–170. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6920-9_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singh D, Rao GP. Sudan grass [Sorghum sudanense Stapf]: a new Sugarcane streak mosaic virus mechanical host. Guangxi Agric Sci. 2010;41:436–438. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sztuba-Solińska J, Urbanowicz A, Figlerowicz M, Bujarski JJ. RNA–RNA recombination in plant virus replication and evolution. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:415–443. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tatineni S, Ziems AD, Wegulo SN, French R. Triticum mosaic virus: a distinct member of the family Potyviridae with an unusually long leader sequence. Phytopathology. 2009;99:943–950. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-8-0943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Van der Walt E, Rybicki EP, Varsani A, Polston JE, Billharz R, Donaldson L, Monjane AL, Martin DP. Rapid host adaptation by extensive recombination. J Gen Virol. 2009;90(Pt 3):734–746. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.007724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vigne E, Bergdoll M, Guyader S, Fuchs M. Population structure and genetic variability within isolates of Grapevine fanleaf virus from a naturally infected vineyard in France: evidence for mixed infection and recombination. J Gen Virol. 2004;85(Pt 8):2435–2445. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.79904-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Viswanathan R, Balamuralikrishnan M, Karuppaiah R. Sugarcane mosaic in India: a cause of combined infection of Sugarcane mosaic virus and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus. Int Sugar J. 2007;25:6–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Viswanathan R, Balamuralikrishnan M, Karuppaiah R. Characterization and genetic diversity of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus causing mosaic in sugarcane. Virus Genes. 2008;36:553–564. doi: 10.1007/s11262-008-0228-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xie Y, Wang M, Xu D, Li R, Zhou G. Simultaneous detection and identification of four sugarcane viruses by one-step RT-PCR. J Virol Methods. 2009;162:64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu DL, Park JW, Mirkov TE, Zhou GH. Viruses causing mosaic disease in sugarcane and their genetic diversity in southern China. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1031–1039. doi: 10.1007/s00705-008-0072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xu DL, Zhou GH, Xie YJ, Mock R, Li R. Complete nucleotide sequence and taxonomy of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus, member of a novel genus in the family Potyviridae. Virus Genes. 2010;40:432–439. doi: 10.1007/s11262-010-0457-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from VirusDisease are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES