Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Aug 28;8:12954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31061-w

Evaluation of modified Interferon alpha mRNA constructs for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer

Sarah Hochmann 1,2, Michaela Mittermeir 1,2, Radmila Santic 3, Frieder Koszik 3, Lanay Griessner 3, Alina Sarah Sonderegger 1,2, Thomas Hoffmann 3, Elisabeth Russe 4, Sandra Scheiblhofer 5, Richard Weiss 5, Markus Mandler 3, Achim Schneeberger 3, Dirk Strunk 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC6113332  PMID: 30154486

Abstract

Application of in vitro transcribed (IVT) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is an increasingly popular strategy to transiently produce proteins as therapeutics in a tissue or organ of choice. Here, we focused on the skin and aimed to test if whole human skin tissue explant technology can be used to evaluate the expression efficacy of different IVT Interferon alpha (IFN-α) mRNA constructs in situ, after biolistic delivery. Skin explants were viable and intact for at least five days based on histologic analysis and TUNEL staining. Using GFP reporter mRNA formulations, we found mostly epidermal expression after biolistic delivery. Two out of five sequence-optimized IFN-α mRNA variants resulted in significantly improved IFN-α protein expression in human skin compared to native IFN-α mRNA transfection. IFN-α secretion analysis of the surrounding culture media confirmed these results. We provide a proof-of-concept that IFN-α mRNA delivery into intact human full thickness skin explants can be utilized to test mRNA sequence modifications ex vivo. This approach could be used to develop novel mRNA-based treatments of common epidermal skin conditions including non-melanoma skin cancer, where IFN-α protein therapy has previously shown a strong therapeutic effect.

Introduction

Recent developments in nucleic acid-based therapeutics, especially ribonucleic acid (RNA)-based therapies, have shown significant potential for a wide range of human diseases (reviewed in1). Initial attempts towards in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA therapy date back to 1992, where a temporary reversal of diabetes insipidus in a rat model after intrahypothalamic injection of vasopressin mRNA was demonstrated2. However, clinical translation of this research for systemic diseases has been limited by enzymatic degradation of RNA molecules, low delivery to the diseased site, as well as toxicity concerns. In contrast, delivery of nucleic acids to the skin is advantageous because it is able to bypass many of these challenges associated with systemic administration, including simplifying application and increasing local bioavailabilty (reviewed in3), making it an ideal target for the development of RNA-based therapeutics.

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common form of cancer worldwide among people with fair complexions. NMSCs most notably include basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and the in situ carcinoma actinic keratosis (AK). Ultraviolet light exposure is the greatest risk factor in the development of NMSCs. Despite growing public awareness of the harmful effects of excessive sun exposure, the incidence of NMSCs continues to rise4. The World Health Organization currently estimates that between two and three million NMSCs are diagnosed globally each year5.

Although surgical removal of NMSC lesions remains the gold-standard for treatment, it is not able to address the field-cancerization that is commonly associated with the condition, where a large surface area can be affected. To address the cancerous field, topical therapies such as imiquimod and ingenol mebutate are often used6. However, these treatments have the disadvantage of low patient compliance and are not recommended for high-risk lesions7.

Interferon alpha (IFN-α) is a key immunostimulatory molecule with potent anti-tumoral effects. Since the 1980s, perilesional treatment using IFN-α has been shown to be safe and effective against BCC8–10, SCC11,12, and AK13,14. However, its broad implementation in the clinic for NMSC therapy has been hindered for several reasons including the need of daily applications over 10–14 days as well as high costs of IFN-α.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) therapy provides one way to overcome these limitations. In vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA therapy introduces mRNA transcripts into the cell cytoplasm to drive synthesis of a specific protein. Interest in the technology has surged in the past decade following the discovery of IVT mRNA modifications that reduced immunogenicity15,16 and increased stability17,18, making mRNA a viable therapeutic option also for protein replacement. Compared to DNA-based approaches, mRNA has the distinct advantage that it does not integrate into the host genome, minimizing potential treatment risks including insertional mutagenesis. Therapeutic protein expression efficiency following IVT mRNA application has been shown to be comparable to that obtained after plasmid DNA transfer19.

In this study, we explored the delivery of IFN-α IVT mRNA to the epidermis in human skin explants. To improve cellular bioavailability of the mRNA molecule and overcome the stratum corneum, we choose a biolistic approach that has been previously used to deliver DNA to both mouse20–23 and human skin24. Here, we demonstrate that this approach can successfully produce IFN-α expression in ex vivo human skin using IVT mRNA, and present optimized IFN-α mRNA sequence variants that show increased production compared to the native sequence. These results demonstrate the potential utility of an IFN-α IVT mRNA therapy for common epidermal skin conditions, including NMSCs, where IFN-α protein therapy has previously shown a strong therapeutic effect25.

Results

Establishment of skin tissue culture and biolistic delivery conditions

We first established conditions to keep skin viable for at least five days in culture. Punch biopsies of six compared to eight mm in diameter were obtained from whole thickness human skin within four hours following tissue collection after plastic reconstructive surgery (Fig. S1a,c). Punch biopsy derived skin explants were cultured at the air-liquid interface either in transwell inserts (Fig. S1d) or adherent to the tissue culture plastic in 150 cm2 tissue culture petri dishes (Fig. S1e,f). Histologic analysis in a time course after one, two and five days showed best preservation of skin appearance in 8 mm biopsies cultured at the air-liquid interface in petri dishes (Fig. S2). Viability was further tested by TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end (TUNEL) labeling, which showed minimal signs of apoptosis after 5 days in culture (Fig. S2o–r). To functionally confirm the viability of cultured explants, fibroblast outgrowth was determined at the end of a five day explant culture. Radial outgrowth of primary fibroblasts was clearly visable around ex vivo cultures, indicating that the tissue remained functional (Fig. S3). We therefore continued testing 8 mm biopsies in subsequent experiments.

eGFP mRNA is successfully expressed in the epidermis

The general experimental strategy for treating ex vivo skin is depicted in Fig. 1a. Next, eGFP mRNA was applied under defined conditions to intact surgically resected skin (Fig. S1b). Eight mm punch biopsies (Fig. 2a) were obtained immediately after biolistic delivery of 1.6 µm diameter gold particles loaded with reference eGFP coding mRNA using a gene gun device. An overview of the sample histology revealed intact skin architecture (Fig. 2). Higher magnification microscopy showed presence of gold particles delivered with 400 psi predominantly in the epidermis. Approximately one third of the gold particles were found within the upper dermal compartment with certain donor variability as visualized in 10 µm thick sections (Fig. 2c). Thin sections (2 µm) performed after gold particle application showed gold particles mainly in the stratum corneum compatible with either local variability or with the notion that thicker (e.g. 10 µm) sections are required to depict distribution of the 1.6 µm diameter particle (Fig. 2d).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Experimental Setup - biolistic mRNA transfection and mRNA design strategy. (a) Skin was transfected ex vivo using the BioRad Helios gene gun System with an application pressure of 400 psi. Six mm and eight mm punch biopsies were obtained and explants were cultured for at least 24 h either in transwells or petri dishes, before further analyses. (b) Schematic overview of IFN-α coding sequence (for details see also Table 1). Abbreviations: Anti-Reverse Cap Analog (ARCA-Cap); Start Codon (AUG); Stop Codon, (Stop); untranslated region (UTR), 5′ and 3′ end; coding sequence, (CDS); Poly(A) Tail (polyA120).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Histology of skin explants. (a) Macroscopic picture of a skin biopsy. (b) HE staining of a longitudinal section of the biopsy prior to gene gun application (c) 10 µm unstained cryo section showing gold particles (indicated by black dotted circles) in the epidermis and dermis of the explant. The dermal-epidermal border was marked by a black dotted line. (d) HE staining of a thin 2 µm paraffin section after gene gun application showing 1.6 µm gold particles predominantly in the epidermis (indicated by yellow circles). Scale bar in (a,b) represents 1000 µm; Scale bars in (c,d) represent 50 µm.

GFP protein expression was determined 24 h after delivery using indirect immunofluorescence with anti-GFP antibody and Alexa488 green fluorescent label revealing predominantly epidermal GFP protein expression in the skin explants. Cytoskeleton and nuclear labeling with phalloidin and DAPI, respectively, additionally allowed confirming intact skin architecture after culture of biolistically treated skin compared to untreated biopsies (Figs 3 and 4). We did not detect eGFP staining after applying the eGFP mRNA gold particles without gene gun/pressure onto the skin. We did also not detect eGFP signal after applying the eGFP mRNA alone without gene gun/gold particles (Fig. S4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Biolistic eGFP IVT mRNA transfection in human skin explants. (a,h–l) Untransfected control biopsies. (b–g) Biopsies treated biolistically with 1 μg/μl eGFP mRNA. Reactivity for eGFP (green), F-Actin (red) and nuclei (blue) as indicated. (b) Additional suprabasal GFP-transfected cells are marked by white arrowheads. (g) Gold particles are visible in merged fluorescence + bright field image after biolistic eGFP mRNA delivery. Scale bars in (a,b) represent 500 μm; Scale bars in (c–l) represent 50 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Variable location of eGFP transfected cells. GFP expressing cells were also found in suprabasal position in addition to the superficial position shown in Fig. 3b–g. (a) Representative result of suprabasal GFP+ epidermal cells 24 h after biolistic transfection, (b) in higher magnification, both showing an overlay of GFP and DAPI signals with bright field (BF) to visualize gold microparticles. (c) Same magnification than in (b) without depicting microparticles. Results from one representative donor (of five tested for GFP transfection) Scale bar 50 µm.

IFN-α variants differ in their expression level but are comparable between donors

Next, we generated five differentially modified IFN-α mRNA variants to be compared for their expression efficacy to native human IFN-α mRNA (Fig. 1b and Table 1). Two general types of modifications were applied. In all variants, untranslated regions (UTRs) were exchanged to contain an adapted globin UTR (instead of the IFN UTR). Additionally, in variants 2, 3, 4 and 5, we changed the GC content while considering primarily codons that optimally fit the human translation machinery (as assessed by the codon adaptivity index (CAI)26. Bullet loading was measured by PCR clearly indicating space for improvement (Fig. 5a). Protein expression analysis within extracts derived from skin explant tissue that had been exposed to native IFN-α mRNA 24 h earlier by biolistic delivery, revealed efficient expression of IFN-α protein. Variant 1, which differs from the native IFN-α mRNA in the UTR region only, yielded mean 8.5-fold significantly higher expression levels than native human IFN-α mRNA in all donors tested. Out of the 4 variants that were modified in the coding region as well, only variant 3 was found to result in mean ten-fold significantly higher protein expression compared to the native mRNA molecule (Fig. 6). Of note, the expression pattern was consistent among all donors, while the expression levels of the 5 variants differed between the donors tested. Control experiments, based on the same techniques for extract preparation and IFN-α measurement, demonstrated retrieval of 80–90% of human IFN-α protein (Roferon, Roche) injected intradermally into skin explants (Fig. S5). Secreted IFN-α protein measurements in the culture media surrounding the explants from two donors confirmed the results (Fig. S6). Preliminary results of IFN-α secretion time course analysis after a single transfection indicate progressive reduction of IFN-α protein over time (Fig. S7). Interferon mRNA-loaded microparticle distribution was found mostly within the epidermis and protein expression analysis in situ was positive for all interferon-transfected samples except for variant three (Fig. 5b).

Table 1.

Design of IVT Interferon alpha mRNA variants (IFN-α var1 – IFN-α var5).

IVT mRNA 5′ and 3′ UTR Sequence variation (%) GC content (CDS) Codon optimization
IFN α human IFN α — 48.7 −
IFN α var1 modified — 48.7 −
IFN α var2 modified 21.5 49.9 +
IFN α var3 modified 21 56.8 +
IFN α var4 modified 23 40.4 +
IFN α var 5 modified 21 60 +
Open in a new tab

IFN-α resembels the native human IFN-α. All other variants were modified versions of IFN-α as indicated. Abbreviations: CDS, coding sequence; UTR, untranslated region. I.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Functionality control of IVT mRNA using biolistic application in ex vivo human skin. (a) Quality control of mRNA loaded bullets. Samples were analysed in a blinded fashion and thereby the nomenclature is resulting in a mixed order on the gel. Left lane always indicates mRNA before loading onto bullets, right lane shows the mRNA after extracting from loaded bullets. Outer lanes depict size markers. (b) Human whole skin explants were transfected using gene gun technology with native IFN-α mRNA or five different mRNA variants (for details see Table 1) compared to untransfected explants (CTRL) and subsequently Hematoxylin/Eosin stainings (HE) on paraffin sections were performed. A set of seven representative areas per sample showing the gold particles after biolistic transfection highlighted by yellow circles indicating targeting of mostly epidermis but also dermis. Scale bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

IVT Interferon mRNA variant -based Interferon protein expression in skin explant tissue. Human whole skin explants were transfected using gene gun technology with native IFN-α mRNA or five different IFN-α mRNA variants (IFN-α var 1–5, for details see Table 1) compared to eGFP reference transfections and un-transfected control explants (CTRL). IFN-α content in explants homogenized 24 h after treatment is shown as pg protein produced per mg skin tissue homogenate. (N = 5; Dunnet’s multiple comparison for the individual variant IFN-α vs. native IFN-α expression; significant differences are indicated ** vs. ****). Data depicted at logarithmic scale.

Low levels of IFN-α expression were also detectable in explants after GFP mRNA transfection what may indicate an IFN-α presence in resident cells within skin explants or due to gold particle bombardment and/or GFP expression. A minute IFN-α signal was also detected in untransfected control explants possibly due to surgery or as a response to biopsy explantation. The precise mechanism behind this statistically non-significant low expression has not been addressed in the current study.

Discussion

Clinical applicability of IVT mRNA for treatments other than vaccination still faces several challenges including, most notably, limited availability of custom-tailored delivery systems and lack of well-tolerated formulations reproducibly allowing for efficient mRNA expression. In addition, immunogenicity concerns are an issue particularly for protein replacement approaches but, less so, for strategies relying on the action of proinflammatory targets such as IFN-α. Here, we showed that IVT IFN-α mRNA can be successfully delivered to human skin by biolistic application. We further demonstated that delivery of equal amounts of two out of five sequence optimized IVT IFN-α mRNA variants resulted in significantly higher temporary IFN-α protein expression compared to the native human IFN-α mRNA across all donors (n = 5) tested. These results provide a proof-of-concept towards treating skin diseases such as NMSCs with mRNA-based therapeutics coding for molecules such as IFN-α. Although the ex vivo results obtained here are promising, improved expression over the native sequence would need to be confirmed in vivo. Previous IVT mRNA modifications by other groups have shown the potential to improve the intracellular and translational stability of the ensuing variants and their efficiency over the native sequence including modifications to the 5′-cap27,28, 5′ and 3′-untranslated regions29, the poly (A) tail30,31 and codon optimization approaches32. Such changes have been shown to result in improved translation, reduced immunogenicity and delayed degradation by nucleases, thereby enhancing the potential for an mRNA to exert a therapeutic effect33,34. Using our optimization approach, we found that both exchange of the UTR and modifications of the coding region aiming at an improved and constant CAI but varying the GC content led to significant enhancement in IFN-α expression for some of the variants. This is promising given the fact that the native IFN-α mRNA sequence has already a near optimum codon composition. The results also stress the need to experimentally test the in silico predicted optimizations as not all of the variants turned out to excel the native IFN-α mRNA.

Skin explants derived from human donors or animals represent established models for drug screening35. However, as they lack functioning vascular, nervous and immune systems it is not possible to extrapolate in vivo responses to the treatment. In addition, there may be variability between donor skin samples (e.g., the age of skin donors tested in this trial was mean = 43.3, range = 27–70 years). As NMSCs primarily affect those in mid-life or later, it is possible that the response observed for younger skin might differ from the one of the skin of the target population for the planned treatment.

The biolistic approach utilized here uses mRNA-loaded gold particle bombardment to deliver IVT mRNA through the stratum corneum to the epidermis. Although this approach has shown great promise in DNA vaccination36, it has several limitations. The entry of the gene-gunned gold particles can cause cell damage to the surrounding tissue, which may complicate the interpretation of in vivo results. Alternative technology like microinjection37 or needle-free injection38 may offer certain advantages over particle-based approaches including the possibility to also target the dermis. In addition, the gene gun technique is not compatible with testing the impact of different transfection reagent formulations which have been shown to enhance the uptake of mRNA as well as facilitating endosomal escape and boosting in vivo potency (reviewed in39). Further limitations of particle-based transfection technology relate to a still limited efficiency of particle loading. In addition, in our study, we observed rapid decline of IFN-α protein secretion after one single transfection. Whereas temporary expression of the therapeutic molecule can be one goal of IVT mRNA-based therapy several aspects requiring further improvement could be identified in this study.

Therefore, focusing on alternative strategies that employ optimized transfection reagent formulations in particle-free systems would enable us to reduce the required dose of IVT mRNA needed to produce a therapeutic effect. Our future work will also be focused on identifying a suitable formulation for clinical development for sensitive areas of the skin, such as face, where a gene gun approach would not be suitable.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of RNA bullets for the gene gun system

RNA bullets were prepared by mixing 25 mg gold microcarriers (1.6 µm diameter; Bio-Rad; 1652264) with 400 µl 2-propanol and sonicated for 5 minutes. RNA solution (200 µl) was prepared containing 100 µg of RNA (eGFP-mRNA; 1 µg/µl; AmpTec; 7001-M0514/1000), 0.5 M ammonium acetate and nuclease-free H20 and added drop wise to the gold microcarriers while continuously vortexing the mixture. RNA was precipitated by incubating the mixture at −20 °C for at least one hour. Thereafter the RNA-gold complexes were washed three-to-four times in 100% dried ethanol and finally resuspended in 3 ml 100% ethanol supplemented with 0.04 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolindone (PVP). The suspension was coated onto the inner wall of tefzel tubing (3.175 mm outer diameter; 2.36 mm inner diameter; #1652441, Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and cut into approximately 40 cartridges (approximately 15 mm length; tubing cutter #1652422; Bio-Rad) which were stored at −20 °C until use for a maximum of eight weeks.

Biolistic transfection of human skin explants

Human full thickness skin was obtained from biologic waste material after informed consent as approved by the ethical committee of the region of Salzburg (vote number: 415-E/1990/8–216). Skin was wiped with sterile PBS to remove adherent blood after placing in a laminar air hood (Fig. S1). For transfection the handheld Bio-Rad Helios gene gun system was loaded with eGFP-mRNA coated gold particles using a helium gas pressure of 400 psi at a distance of 2.5 cm. After transfection six vs. eight mm diameter punch biopsies were obtained and maintained in α-MEM cell culture medium supplemented with 2.5 mL Dipeptiven (Fresenius Kabi) and 10% pooled human platelet lysate (pHPL) as described previously40 (at the air-liquid interface in a humidified air incubator at 5% CO2 for up to five days. Subsequently the biopsies were either snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, or transferred to RNAlater Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific; AM7020) for RNA and protein analysis or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde over night at 4 °C before further histology processing as described previously41. Control experiments were performed testing the application of eGFP mRNA-loaded gold particles without gun/pressure as well as application of eGFP mRNA alone. Untreated skin biopsies were cultivated for 24 h and subsequently paraffin sections were performed and stained for eGFP/Phalloidin/DAPI and hematoxylin/eosin. The eGFP mRNA loaded gold particles were applied onto a transparent film dressing (Tegaderm; 1624W; 3 M Health Care, USA) using the gene gun application. Subsequently the film patch including the mRNA loaded gold particles was placed onto the ex vivo skin and 8 mm biopsies were taken and cultured for 24 h. Subsequently paraffin sections were performed and stained for eGFP (anti-GFP; chicken IgY; Life Technologies; A10262) Phalloidin (Alexa Fluor 568, A12380; Life Technologies, USA) and DAPI and hematoxylin and eosin. In addition 1 µg eGFP mRNA in PBS was applied onto the ex vivo skin. The droplet was incubated for about 30 minutes and subsequently covered with a transparent film dressing (Tegaderm). Skin biopsies were taken and cultivated for 24 h and paraffin sections were performed and stained as indicated (Fig. S4).

Immunohistochemistry, TUNEL labeling and histochemistry

Ten µm cryosections were performed for fluorescence analysis and processed essentially as described previously42. GFP antibody (anti-GFP; chicken IgY; Life Technologies; A10262) was used at 1:500 dilution and detected by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-chicken IgY antibody (1:500; Dianova 703-545-155). The cytoskeleton was detected by staining F-actin using Alexa Fluor 568 Phalloidin (Life Technologies; A12380; 1:400) and slides were mounted in Roti-mount Fluor Care DAPI (Carl Roth; HP20.1) containing DAPI (4′,6-Diamidin-2-phenylindol) for counterstaining. TUNEL labeling was performed following manufacturer’s instructions (Promega Dead End Colorimetric TUNEL System #G7130). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was done in the linear slide stainer (Leica ST4040) in two µm sections of paraffin embedded tissue using Mayer’s Hemalum (MERCK; 1.09249.2500) and Eosin Y (MERCK; 1.15935.0100).

Image acquisition

Slides were scanned automatically in 20x or 40x magnification using the VS-120-L Olympus slide scanner 100-W system. Pictures were processed using the Olympus VS-ASW-L100 program and figures were prepared using Microsoft PowerPoint 2010.

Preparation of in vitro transcribed mRNA

In vitro transcribed mRNA for eGFP (1 µg/µl; 7001-M0154/1000) was obtained from AmpTec, Germany. Native human IFN-α mRNA, with regard to the coding DNA sequence (CDS) and the flanking UTRs, as well as five sequence-optimized variants of human IFN-α were synthesised by Eurofins, Germany. In vitro transcription and purification of IFN-α mRNA variants was performed by AmpTec, Germany, according to published procedures43. Briefly, RNA was transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase and ARCA-NTP-Mix from a linear template generated by PCR. Purified mRNA was treated with antarctic phosphatase and re-purified. RNA integrity and purity was controlled by analysis on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent, USA). The RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry on an Infinite 200 PRO multimode reader (Tecan AG, Switzerland).

Analysis of human IFN-α protein

Analysis of mRNA transfected skin explant tissue was done using two approaches: (i) we either subjected supernatants of tissue cultures or (ii) protein extracts derived from explants to IFN-α measurement by ELISA. Protein was extracted using cell extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 µM EDTA, 0.3% NP40 and Roche protease inhibitor, according to manufacturer’s protocol). Measurement of human IFN-α was performed using the human IFN-α (subtype 2, IFN-α2) ELISA development kit (MABTECH AB, Sweden, according to manufacturer instructions). Protein concentration of extracts was determined using a conventional BCA test (Pierce, USA; according to manufacturer’s protocol). IFN-α and protein measurements were taken on an Infinite 200 PRO multimode reader (Tecan AG, Switzerland).

Ethics Statement

Human full thickness skin was obtained from biologic waste material after informed consent as approved by the ethical committee of the region of Salzburg (vote number: 415-E/1990/8–216). Skin samples were collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki after written informed consent from healthy volunteers.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Data (8.7MB, doc)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Anna Hochreiter, Anna Maria Raninger, Sigrid Kahr and Margit Wieneroiter for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Patricia Peking and Walter Schmidt for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) (grant agreement no. 854355 and 864404); by the Austrian Wirtschaftsservice (AWS) SEED financing (grant agreement no. P1620096-SLZ01) and by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreements nos. 668724 and 733006).

Author Contributions

D.S., S.H., A.S., Ma.M. planned and designed experiments. S.H., Mi.M., R.S., F.K., A.S.S. and T.H. performed experiments. D.S., Ma.M., S.H., A.S. and L.G. wrote the manuscript and prepared figures. E.R. performed skin surgery. Mi.M. and R.W. prepared mRNA bullets. S.S. performed quality control of mRNA loading. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Data availability

All data produced or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Competing Interests

R.S., F.K., L.G., T.H., Ma.M., A.S., are employees of Accanis Biotech F&E GmbH & Co KG that is commercializing the mRNA variants described in this manuscript. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-31061-w.

References

  • 1.Sahin U, Kariko K, Tureci O. mRNA-based therapeutics–developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:759–780. doi: 10.1038/nrd4278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jirikowski GF, Sanna PP, Maciejewski-Lenoir D, Bloom FE. Reversal of diabetes insipidus in Brattleboro rats: intrahypothalamic injection of vasopressin mRNA. Science. 1992;255:996–998. doi: 10.1126/science.1546298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zakrewsky M, Kumar S, Mitragotri S. Nucleic acid delivery into skin for the treatment of skin disease: Proofs-of-concept, potential impact, and remaining challenges. J Control Release. 2015;219:445–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F. A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:1069–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization, How common is skin cancer?http://www.who.int/uv/faq/skincancer/en/index1.html Accessed on 08.01.2018 (2018).
  • 6.Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies RM. Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:673–685. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61196-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richard, M. A. et al. Management of actinic keratosis at specific body sites in patients at high risk of carcinoma lesions: expert consensus from the AKTeam of expert clinicians. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 10.1111/jdv.14753 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Buechner SA. Intralesional interferon alfa-2b in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical study on cellular immune reaction leading to tumor regression. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:731–734. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70111-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chimenti S, Peris K, Di Cristofaro S, Fargnoli MC, Torlone G. Use of recombinant interferon alfa-2b in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Dermatology. 1995;190:214–217. doi: 10.1159/000246688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tucker SB, Polasek JW, Perri AJ, Goldsmith EA. Long-term follow-up of basal cell carcinomas treated with perilesional interferon alfa 2b as monotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:1033–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edwards L, et al. Treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas by intralesional interferon alfa-2b therapy. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1486–1489. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1992.01680210064008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ikic D, et al. Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma with interferon. Int J Dermatol. 1991;30:58–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1991.tb05884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Edwards L, Levine N, Weidner M, Piepkorn M, Smiles K. Effect of intralesional alpha 2-interferon on actinic keratoses. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:779–782. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1986.01660190057016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang WL, Lee JY. Extensive inflammation of actinic keratoses during interferon alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis C in a Taiwanese albino woman. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:728–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kariko K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity. 2005;23:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kariko K, et al. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1833–1840. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Holtkamp S, et al. Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells. Blood. 2006;108:4009–4017. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-015024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kariko K, Kuo A, Barnathan E. Overexpression of urokinase receptor in mammalian cells following administration of the in vitro transcribed encoding mRNA. Gene Ther. 1999;6:1092–1100. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matsui A, Uchida S, Ishii T, Itaka K, Kataoka K. Messenger RNA-based therapeutics for the treatment of apoptosis-associated diseases. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15810. doi: 10.1038/srep15810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jalili A. Chemokine overexpression in the skin by biolistic DNA delivery. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;940:175–188. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee PW, et al. The use of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles in combination with a low-pressure gene gun for transdermal DNA delivery. Biomaterials. 2008;29:742–751. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peking P, et al. A Gene Gun-mediated Nonviral RNA trans-splicing Strategy for Col7a1 Repair. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2016;5:e287. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2016.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xia J, Martinez A, Daniell H, Ebert SN. Evaluation of biolistic gene transfer methods in vivo using non-invasive bioluminescent imaging techniques. BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11:62. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sokol E, et al. Particle Bombardment of Ex Vivo Skin to Deliver DNA and Express Proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1559:107–118. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6786-5_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chitwood K, Etzkorn J, Cohen G. Topical and intralesional treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer: efficacy and cost comparisons. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1306–1316. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon Adaptation Index–a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:1281–1295. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grudzien-Nogalska E, Jemielity J, Kowalska J, Darzynkiewicz E, Rhoads RE. Phosphorothioate cap analogs stabilize mRNA and increase translational efficiency in mammalian cells. RNA. 2007;13:1745–1755. doi: 10.1261/rna.701307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kowalska J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of mRNA cap analogs containing phosphorothioate substitutions that bind tightly to eIF4E and are resistant to the decapping pyrophosphatase DcpS. RNA. 2008;14:1119–1131. doi: 10.1261/rna.990208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen CY, Shyu AB. AU-rich elements: characterization and importance in mRNA degradation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:465–470. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Korner CG, Wahle E. Poly(A) tail shortening by a mammalian poly(A)-specific 3′-exoribonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:10448–10456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.16.10448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Martin G, Keller W. Tailing and 3′-end labeling of RNA with yeast poly(A) polymerase and various nucleotides. RNA. 1998;4:226–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Presnyak V, et al. Codon optimality is a major determinant of mRNA stability. Cell. 2015;160:1111–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferizi M, et al. Human cellular CYBA UTR sequences increase mRNA translation without affecting the half-life of recombinant RNA transcripts. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39149. doi: 10.1038/srep39149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nowakowski A, et al. Translation, but not transfection limits clinically relevant, exogenous mRNA based induction of alpha-4 integrin expression on human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01304-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mathes SH, Ruffner H, Graf-Hausner U. The use of skin models in drug development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;69–70:81–102. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fuller DH, Loudon P, Schmaljohn C. Preclinical and clinical progress of particle-mediated DNA vaccines for infectious diseases. Methods. 2006;40:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Golombek S, et al. Intradermal Delivery of Synthetic mRNA Using Hollow Microneedles for Efficient and Rapid Production of Exogenous Proteins in Skin. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;11:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McAllister L, et al. Needle-free jet injection for administration of influenza vaccine: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9944):674–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60524-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schott JW, Morgan M, Galla M, Schambach A. Viral and Synthetic RNA Vector Technologies and Applications. Mol Ther. 2016;24:1513–1527. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schallmoser K, Strunk D. Generation of a pool of human platelet lysate and efficient use in cell culture. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;946:349–362. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-128-8_22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barker CJ, Bowler K. Lipid composition of the membranes from cells of two rat tumors and its relationship to tumor thermosensitivity. Radiat Res. 1991;125:48–55. doi: 10.2307/3577981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hofmann NA, et al. Oxygen sensing mesenchymal progenitors promote neo-vasculogenesis in a humanized mouse model in vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Quabius ES, Krupp G. Synthetic mRNAs for manipulating cellular phenotypes: an overview. N Biotechnol. 2015;32:229–235. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data (8.7MB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All data produced or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES