Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin chemotherapy and surgery are effective treatments for children with standardrisk hepatoblastoma but may cause considerable and irreversible hearing loss. This trial compared cisplatin with cisplatin plus delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate, aiming to reduce the incidence and severity of cisplatin-related ototoxic effects without jeopardizing overall and event-free survival.
METHODS
We randomly assigned children older than 1 month and younger than 18 years of age who had standard-risk hepatoblastoma (⩾3 involved liver sectors, no metastatic disease, and an alpha-fetoprotein level of >100 ng per milliliter) to receive cisplatin alone (at a dose of 80 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered over a period of 6 hours) or cisplatin plus sodium thiosulfate (at a dose of 20 g per square meter, administered intravenously over a 15-minute period, 6 hours after the discontinuation of cisplatin) for four preoperative and two postoperative courses. The primary end point was the absolute hearing threshold, as measured by pure-tone audiometry, at a minimum age of 3.5 years. Hearing loss was assessed according to the Brock grade (on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher grades indicating greater hearing loss). The main secondary end points were overall survival and event-free survival at 3 years.
RESULTS
A total of 109 children were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin plus sodium thiosulfate (57 children) or cisplatin alone (52) and could be evaluated. Sodium thiosulfate was associated with few high-grade toxic effects. The absolute hearing threshold was assessed in 101 children. Hearing loss of grade 1 or higher occurred in 18 of 55 children (33%) in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group, as compared with 29 of 46 (63%) in the cisplatin-alone group, indicating a 48% lower incidence of hearing loss in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.81; P=0.002). At a median of 52 months of follow-up, the 3-year rates of event-free survival were 82% (95% CI, 69 to 90) in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 79% (95% CI, 65 to 88) in the cisplatin-alone group, and the 3-year rates of overall survival were 98% (95% CI, 88 to 100) and 92% (95% CI, 81 to 97), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of sodium thiosulfate, administered 6 hours after cisplatin chemotherapy, resulted in a lower incidence of cisplatin-induced hearing loss among children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma, without jeopardizing overall or event-free survival. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; SIOPEL 6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00652132; EudraCT number, 2007–002402-21.)
Hepatoblastoma is a rare primary liver cancer with an age-adjusted incidence of 0.13 patients per 100,000 population.1 Hepatoblastoma can be categorized as standard-risk or high-risk disease according to the serum alpha-fetoprotein level in addition to the results of the revised Pretreatment Extent of Disease (PRETEXT) assessment, which includes metastatic disease.2–4 The combination of cisplatin monotherapy and surgery is the standard of care for children with standard-risk disease and results in good long-term survival.5 However, hearing loss constitutes a serious and permanent side effect of cisplatin chemotherapy; even mild hearing loss may severely affect learning, development, and quality of life in young children.6–8 Key consonants are heard at high frequencies (4 kHz through 8 kHz), and so their loss is debilitating, particularly in young children in whom speech has not yet developed (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).9 Brock grading is used to distinguish among hearing-loss levels defined as minimal, mild, moderate, marked, or severe (grades 0 to 4, respectively) and has a low false positive rate as compared with other ototoxicity grading systems.10,11 In previous studies conducted by the International Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL), more than 60% of the children in whom hearing levels were assessed by pure-tone audiometry had permanent high-frequency hearing loss of Brock grade 1 or higher, affecting the frequencies of 8 kHz and below.12 The question was whether the risk of hearing loss could be reduced by the introduction of an otoprotectant.
Nonclinical studies and initial phase 1–2 trials indicated that sodium thiosulfate has a potential otoprotective effect, with maximum efficacy occurring when sodium thiosulfate is administered 4 to 8 hours after cisplatin,13–20 and that the potential tumor-protective effect could be managed.21,22 Pharmacokinetic data and further analysis showed that 6 hours was a safe timing for the delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate in order to avoid tumor protection.23,24 Since children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma can be treated with cisplatin alone, they represent an appropriate group in which to explore otoprotection with the delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate. Hence, this randomized, phase 3 trial, SIOPEL 6, was designed to investigate the question of whether delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate would reduce the incidence and severity of hearing loss caused by cisplatin.
METHODS
PATIENTS
We conducted this international, cooperative, prospective, randomized trial over a period of 7 years. The trial data were blinded for the audiology central reviewer. Children younger than 18 years of age who had standard-risk hepatoblastoma that had not been treated previously were eligible. Written approval from local research ethics committees was obtained, and written informed consent was provided by all the parents or legal guardians.
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION OF TUMOR EXTENT
The intrahepatic extent of tumor at diagnosis was assessed by means of ultrasonography of the abdomen as well as by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging with the use of contrast material. Lung metastases were identified on CT of the chest. Tumor extent was graded according to the PRETEXT system (on a scale of I to IV, with higher scores indicating increased extent of the disease in the liver) (see the Supplementary Appendix). Children with PRETEXT I, II, or III hepatoblastoma and with no evidence of extrahepatic disease were eligible.2,5
TRIAL DESIGN, DATA COLLECTION, AND ANALYSIS
The main trial was designed in line with previous SIOPEL trials by the first two authors and the last author. Platinum-DNA adduct studies were designed and carried out by one of the authors at the Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University.
A diagnosis of hepatoblastoma on the basis of histologic testing, imaging, and an elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein level confirming standard-risk hepatoblastoma were required before randomization to the cisplatin group or the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 80 mg per square meter of body-surface area in a continuous intravenous 6-hour infusion for four preoperative and two postoperative courses at 14-day intervals, with or without the administration of sodium thiosulfate. Tumor response was assessed after two and four courses of therapy. Sodium thio-sulfate at a dose of 20 g per square meter was administered intravenously, over a period of 15 minutes, 6 hours after the end of the cisplatin infusion. This dose was chosen to achieve maximum peak serum levels and effective otoprotection on the basis of studies involving children with central nervous system tumors.16
Radical surgery was attempted after four courses or, if the tumor was considered to be unresectable, postponed until the end of treatment. The trial design is shown in Figure S1 in the Supplementary Appendix. Detailed guidelines regarding the adjustment of the cisplatin and sodium thiosulfate doses in children weighing less than 10 kg and regarding hematologic and organ toxic effects were provided in the protocol (available at NEJM.org), as were guidelines for stopping sodium thiosulfate and introducing doxorubicin in the case of progressive disease. Sodium thiosulfate was supplied free of charge by Fennec Pharmaceuticals, which had no role in the design of the trial, the collection or analysis of the data, or the writing of the manuscript.
Data were collected by means of a Web-based electronic clinical research form that was designed and monitored by the authors in collaboration with Consorzio Interuniversitario (CINECA) under the responsibility of the national principal investigators. The authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data and analyses and affirm that the trial was conducted with adherence to the protocol. The first draft of the manuscript was written by the first author, and the SIOPEL 6 trial committee made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. No commercial support for the trial was obtained, and no one who is not an author contributed to the manuscript. This academic trial was conducted and charity-funded in each country under the responsibility of the national principal investigator.
Adverse events were documented according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Serious adverse events were defined in accordance with the harmonized tripartite guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.
ASSESSMENTS
Audiologic assessments by means of pure-tone audiometry were performed before and throughout treatment when possible and were performed in all the children who were alive at 3.5 years of age or older. Audiograms were uploaded, centrally reviewed by one of the authors, and graded on the Brock scale (grades 0 to 4) because the trial was developed before the 2010 International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston consensus ototoxicity grading scale was designed.25 A Brock grade of 0 indicates hearing at less than 40 dB at all frequencies and does not necessarily equate to completely normal hearing. Grades of 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate hearing levels at 40 dB or higher at 8 kHz, 4 kHz, 2 kHz, and 1 kHz and above, respectively.10 The grade was determined according to the hearing level in the child’s better ear.
The primary end point in this trial was the absolute hearing threshold, as measured by pure-tone audiometry, at a minimum age of 3.5 years. Secondary end points were the response to preoperative chemotherapy, complete resection, complete remission, event-free survival, overall survival, toxic effects, long-term renal clearance or glomerular filtration rate, and the feasibility of central audiologic review.
Renal function was monitored at baseline, throughout treatment, and at follow-up by measurement of the glomerular filtration rate. When possible, this was done by radioisotope (51Cr-EDTA) or iohexol methods26,27 or, alternatively, was estimated from the serum creatinine level. At diagnosis, a glomerular filtration rate of less than 75% of the lower limit of the normal range for age (<60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in children >2 years of age) was an exclusion criterion. The serum sodium level and blood pressure were monitored before, during, and after the administration of sodium thiosulfate.
The response criteria for the trial were the following: complete response (no evidence of disease and a normal serum alpha-fetoprotein value for age); partial response (any tumor-volume shrinkage and a decreased serum alpha-fetoprotein level of >1 log below the original measurement); stable disease (no tumor-volume change and a decrease of <1 log in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level); and progressive disease (unequivocal increase in the tumor in ⩾1 dimensions or any unequivocal increase in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level [three successive determinations at intervals of 1 to 2 weeks], even without clinical [physical or radiologic] evidence of tumor regrowth). Complete resection was the total macroscopic removal of tumor. Total hepatectomy followed by liver transplantation was considered as complete resection and not treatment failure.28 Tumor removal with microscopic residual disease, confirmed on histopathological testing but not on imaging, was considered as complete resection.29 Disease status was determined at the end-of-treatment visit after the postsurgery chemotherapy and was defined as complete remission (no evidence of tumor on imaging), partial remission (residual tumor or an alpha-fetoprotein level above the age-standardized upper limit of the normal range), progressive disease (as defined above), or death. Relapse was defined as recurrent tumor detected on imaging and a serial elevation in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level (⩾3 consecutive rising values at a minimum of weekly intervals) or as recurrent tumor detected on imaging, with a normal serum alpha-fetoprotein level, and histologically confirmed on biopsy.
Platinum-DNA adduct levels were measured in whole-blood samples (5 to 10 ml) that were obtained before cisplatin treatment and 24 hours after the start of a 6-hour cisplatin infusion. Adduct levels were assessed by inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry analysis in peripheral-blood lymphocytes, as described previously.30,31
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The trial was designed to have 80% power to detect a difference of 25 percentage points in the rate of the primary end point of hearing loss of grade 1 or higher (a 60% rate of hearing loss in the cisplatin-alone group vs. a 35% rate of hearing loss in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group) with the use of a chi-square test at a significance level of 5%. We used an early-stopping rule for efficacy with O’Brien-Fleming boundaries32 and interim analyses involving 34 children and 68 children who could be evaluated. The test statistic for the final analysis was adjusted for interim looks and conducted at an alpha level of 0.045, with an estimated sample of 102 children who could be evaluated. A stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was also performed with adjustment for the stratification factors of age at randomization (⩾15 months vs. >15 months), tumor extent (PRETEXT score of I or II vs. III),4 and country.
Overall survival was calculated from the time of randomization to death or last follow-up. Event-free survival was calculated from the time of randomization until disease progression, disease relapse, second primary cancer, death, or last follow-up, whichever came first. The final evaluation was conducted once all surviving children had reached the age of 3.5 years.
RESULTS
PATIENTS
From 2007 through 2014, a total of 116 children were enrolled at 52 centers in 12 countries. A total of 113 children underwent randomization; 4 children were found to be ineligible, so the intention-to-treat population included 109 children. A total of 101 children could be evaluated for the primary end point (Fig. S2 in the Supplementary Appendix). The characteristics of the patients were well balanced in the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristic | Cisplatin Alone (N = 52) |
Cisplatin-Sodium Thiosulfate (N = 57) |
---|---|---|
Age — mo | ||
Median | 13.4 | 12.8 |
Range | 3.0–70.2 | 1.2–98.6 |
Male sex — no. (%) | 29 (56) | 30 (53) |
Alpha-fetoprotein level — ng/ml | ||
Median | 73,760 | 154,638 |
Range | 187–2,175,690 | 273–4,536,500 |
PRETEXT score — no. (%)† | ||
I or II | 31 (60) | 41 (72) |
III | 21 (40) | 16 (28) |
Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 80 mg per square meter of body-surface area in a 6-hour intravenous infusion. Sodium thiosulfate was administered at a dose of 20 g per square meter in a 15-minute intravenous infusion 6 hours after cisplatin was stopped. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the above characteristics.
Tumor extent was assessed with the use of the Pretreatment Extent of Disease (PRETEXT) system. Scores range from I to IV, with higher scores indicating increased extent of the disease in the liver. Children with a score of IV were not included in this trial.
PRIMARY END POINT AND SECONDARY END POINT OF FEASIBILITY
Figure 1 shows the centrally reviewed Brock grading with pure-tone audiometry that was performed in children at a minimum age of 3.5 years. Final audiometry was performed at a median of 3 years (range, 3 months to 6.9 years) after randomization. The primary end point of any hearing loss (defined as grade 1, 2, 3, or 4) could be assessed in 101 children. A total of 5 children died before the definitive hearing assessment, definitive audiometry was not feasible for health reasons in 2 children, and the parents of 1 child declined further follow-up.
Hearing loss occurred in 18 of 55 children (33%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 47) who could be evaluated in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group, as compared with 29 of 46 (63%; 95% CI, 48 to 77) in the cisplatin-alone group (P=0.002 by the chi-square test). The relative risk of any hearing loss with cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate treatment was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.81), which translates to a 48% lower risk with cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate than with cisplatin alone. A stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test that was adjusted for the stratification factors of age at randomization (⩾15 months vs. >15 months), tumor extent (PRETEXT score of I or II vs. III),4 and country resulted in a P value of 0.002 (which was lower than the protocol-specified significance level of 0.045).
Central review of the results of pure-tone audiometry was feasible as long as the high frequencies up to 8 kHz had been measured. In several cases, repeat audiograms measuring the high-frequency range had to be requested.
EFFICACY
Results regarding the centrally reviewed response to chemotherapy at two and four cycles, surgeries performed, and status at the end-of-treatment visit and at last follow-up are presented in Table 2. A total of 6 children died: 2 children in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 4 in the cisplatin-alone group (1 child in the cisplatin-alone group had PRETEXT III disease and the other 5 children had PRETEXT I or II disease) (see the Supplementary Appendix). During or after treatment, 11 of 57 children in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 10 of 52 in the cisplatin-alone group had progressive disease (6 and 8 children, respectively), relapse (3 and 0), or both (2 and 2).
Table 2.
Response | Cisplatin Alone (N = 52) |
Cisplatin-Sodium Thiosulfate (N = 57) |
---|---|---|
no. of patients (%) | ||
Response after two cycles | ||
Partial response | 28 (54) | 23 (40) |
Stable disease | 24 (46) | 34 (60) |
Response after four cycles | ||
Partial response | 39 (75) | 38 (67) |
Stable disease | 5 (10) | 11 (19) |
Progressive disease | 5 (10) | 5 (9) |
Not evaluated† | 3 (6) | 3 (5) |
Resection after preoperative chemotherapy |
||
Partial hepatectomy | 48 (92) | 53 (93) |
Liver transplantation | 4 (8) | 4 (7) |
Status at end of treatment | ||
Complete remission | 44 (85) | 52 (91) |
Partial remission | 4 (8) | 5 (9) |
Progressive disease | 2 (4) | 0 |
Died | 1 (2) | 0 |
Not evaluated | 1 (2) | 0 |
Status at last follow-up | ||
Complete remission | 48 (92) | 55 (96) |
Partial remission | 0 | 0 |
Recurrent disease | 0 | 0 |
Died‡ | 4 (8) | 2 (4) |
The response criteria are explained in the Methods section. Doxorubicin may have been administered in cases of progressive disease (or for other reasons, such as a surgeon’s request). A total of 21 children received 1 to 6 courses of doxorubicin during initial therapy, including 9 children in the cisplatin-alone group (who received a total of 30 courses) and 12 in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group (who received a total of 28 courses).
In the cisplatin-alone group, response in two children was not evaluated after four cycles, and treatment in one child was switched to a dose-dense regimen, on the basis of the International Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL) 4 study,33 at the request of the surgeon. In the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group, two children had a response that had been sufficiently good for them to undergo surgery after three cycles, which made them unable to be evaluated for chemotherapy response after four cycles, and response was not evaluated in one child after four cycles.
The deaths in the cisplatin-alone group were due to surgical complications (in one child), due to cardiac arrest after treatment with paclitaxel after progression (in one), and due to disease (in two). The two deaths in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group were due to disease.
The median follow-up of the patients was 52 months. The 3-year data regarding overall survival and event-free survival were similar to those previously reported5 and are shown in Figure 2. The 3-year rate of overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 88 to 100) among children in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 92% (95% CI, 81 to 97) among those in the cisplatin-alone group. The corresponding 3-year rates of event-free survival were 82% (95% CI, 69 to 90) and 79% (95% CI, 65 to 88).
TREATMENT-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS
Adverse-event data for all 109 children who could be evaluated and the numbers of children with adverse events of grade 3 or 4 are presented in Table 3. The maximum grade of targeted events over all cycles is reported according to treatment group.
Table 3.
Adverse Event and Grade | Cisplatin Alone (N = 52) |
Cisplatin-Sodium Thiosulfate (N = 57) |
---|---|---|
no. of patients (%) | ||
Allergy, grade 3 | 1 (2) | 0 |
Febrile neutropenia, grade 3 | 10 (19) | 8 (14) |
Infection, grade 3 | 16 (31) | 13 (23) |
Hypomagnesemia, grade 3 | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Hypernatremia, grade 3 | 0 | 1 (2) |
Vomiting, grade 3 | 2 (4) | 4 (7) |
Nausea, grade 3 | 3 (6) | 2 (4) |
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, grade 3 or 4 |
0 | 0 |
Renal event, grade 3 or 4 | 0 | 0 |
Anemia | ||
Grade 3 | 8 (15) | 10 (18) |
Grade 4 | 0 | 1 (2) |
Leukopenia, grade 3 | 2 (4) | 2 (4) |
Neutropenia | ||
Grade 3 | 3 (6) | 7 (12) |
Grade 4 | 3 (6) | 3 (5) |
Thrombocytopenia | ||
Grade 3 | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Grade 4 | 1 (2 | 1 (2) |
Gastrointestinal event | 2 (4) | 3 (5) |
Elevated liver-enzyme level | ||
Grade 3 | 6 (12) | 3 (5) |
Grade 4 | 0 | 1 (2) |
Elevated serum glucose level, grade 3 | 2 (4) | 1 (2) |
Hypermagnesemia, grade 3† | 2 (4) | 5 (9) |
Hypophosphatemia, grade 3 | 0 | 5 (9) |
Hyperkalemia, grade 3 | 2 (4) | 0 |
Hypokalemia | ||
Grade 3 | 0 | 4 (7) |
Grade 4 | 0 | 1 (2) |
Dyspnea, grade 3 | 1 (2) | 0 |
If grade 4 is not shown, there was no grade 4 adverse event. This table includes adverse events that were associated with additional treatment (mostly doxorubicin) given to children in each group.
The protocol specified the addition of magnesium to the hydration fluid administered with cisplatin therapy.
A total of 68 serious adverse events were reported (including 16 serious adverse reactions). One unexpected serious adverse reaction was reported in a child in whom metabolic acidosis developed during the third infusion of sodium thiosulfate. The sodium thiosulfate infusion was stopped, the child recovered rapidly with fluid resuscitation, and no further sodium thiosulfate was administered in subsequent cycles. The child was alive and free from disease 52 months after randomization, but grade 4 hearing loss has developed. No reason could be found for the sudden deterioration in the child’s general condition, so the event was considered by the investigators to be related to sodium thiosulfate. Of the 16 serious adverse reactions, 8 were coded by the investigator as being possibly, probably, or definitely related to sodium thiosulfate, including grade 3 infections in two children, grade 3 neutropenia in two children, grade 3 anemia leading to transfusion in one child, and tumor progression in two children. In one child, grade 2 nausea and vomiting were reported, and the parents declined further sodium thiosulfate after cycle 2.
RENAL FUNCTION
Four children (two in each group) had an end-of-treatment or follow-up assessment in which the glomerular filtration rate was less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2. The glomerular filtration rate decreased similarly from baseline to follow-up in the two groups, by a median of 12 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 6 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in the cisplatin-alone group.
ADDITIONAL TREATMENT
A total of 21 children (12 children in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 9 in the cisplatin-alone group) received additional doxorubicin. Doxorubicin was administered in 9 children for progressive disease (4 children in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 5 in the cisplatin-alone group) and in 12 for other reasons, mainly at the request of the surgeon. In no patient did the addition of doxorubicin reduce the size of the tumor further.
PLATINUM-DNA ADDUCTS
Blood samples were obtained from 36 children, including 24 children (67%) in the cisplatin-sodium thiosulfate group and 12 (33%) in the cisplatin-alone group. Platinum-DNA adduct levels ranged from 4.3 to 166 nmol per gram of DNA. No correlations were observed between platinum-DNA adduct levels and outcome in terms of hearing loss, response, or event-free or overall survival. Figure S3 in the Supplementary Appendix shows the relationship between plati-num-DNA adduct level and hearing loss.
DISCUSSION
In this trial, the addition of delayed sodium thiosulfate to cisplatin led to a 48% lower risk of hearing loss. Hearing loss of grade 1 or higher occurred in 63% of the children who did not receive otoprotection, as compared with 33% of those who did. The administration of sodium thiosulfate was associated with a trend toward reduced ototoxicity in all the Brock grades. Children with hearing of grade 0 may not have completely normal hearing but can manage life with little or no additional help. Children with hearing loss of grade 1 or higher typically receive further intervention with each increasing grade of hearing loss, with children with any grade of hearing loss receiving educational support. In the United Kingdom, young children with hearing loss of grade 1 and all children with hearing loss of grade 2 or 3 are offered hearing aids. Children with hearing loss of grade 4 are offered cochlear implants. Similar reductions in the incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced ototoxic effects were reported with the delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate in the ACCL0431 trial.34,35 The effect of high-frequency hearing loss and hearing support varies across the world, the reasons for which are multifactorial but include the variation in sound frequencies that are used in different languages. The analysis of these variables was beyond the scope of this trial.
In this trial, progressive tumor developed in the same number of children in each group. There was no significant difference in the rates of event-free survival or overall survival between the two groups.
The incidence of acute adverse events was as expected,5,36 and an unexpected reaction developed in one child. Neither hypertension nor a high serum sodium level resulted in the discontinuation of sodium thiosulfate treatment in any of the children. The otoprotective dose of sodium thiosulfate was associated with a high sodium load, which is a factor to consider in planning treatment. Sodium thiosulfate was emetogenic despite the use of prophylactic antiemetic agents, with nausea and vomiting being common adverse events. Sodium thiosulfate did not alter the use of 24-hour hydration after the administration of cisplatin. Renal function was acceptable in these young children, with four children having a glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 at the end of treatment or follow-up.26,37 The initiation of sodium thiosulfate after a 6-hour delay from the completion of cisplatin administration caused no tumor protection and did not adversely affect disease outcome.
Platinum-DNA adduct formation as measured in peripheral-blood lymphocytes showed no correlation between adduct levels and outcome in terms of hearing loss or clinical response. This finding confirms results from previous studies suggesting that the quantification of platinum-DNA adduct levels in peripheral-blood lymphocytes does not provide a useful biomarker of patients’ response or platinum-induced toxic effects because of a lack of correlation between adduct levels in lymphocytes and those in tumor and other host tissues.30,38,39 Recent evidence suggests that cisplatin-induced ototoxic effects are associated with long-term retention of cisplatin, specific to the cochlea.40
In conclusion, in this randomized, phase 3 trial involving children with localized hepatoblastoma who were undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin alone or cisplatin plus sodium thiosulfate, we found that the delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate resulted in a significantly lower incidence of cisplatin-induced hearing loss, with no evidence of tumor protection.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by Cancer Research UK (in the United Kingdom), La Ligue Contre le Cancer (in France), Krebsforschung Schweiz-Swiss Cancer Research (to Dr. Maibach), and the Children’s Cancer Research Trust, New Zealand (to Ms. Childs), and by grants (R01-CA137488, R01-CA199111, and 2R13 CA086959) from the National Institutes of Health (to Dr. Neuwelt), the Veterans Affairs Merit Review Grant (to Dr. Neuwelt), and the Walter S. and Lucienne Driskill Foundation (to Dr. Neuwelt). Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC), and the Department of Veterans Affairs have a financial interest in Fennec Pharmaceuticals, a company that may have a commercial interest in the results of this research and technology. Dr. Neuwelt, an inventor of technology licensed to Fennec Pharmaceuticals, has divested himself of all potential earnings. These potential conflicts of interest were reviewed and managed by the OHSU Integrity Program Oversight Council and the OHSU and PVAMC Conflict of Interest in Research Committees.
Dr. Hiyama reports receiving drugs provided by Fennec Pharma. Dr. Neuwelt reports receiving grant support from Fennec, holding pending patents (U.S. patent numbers, 11/273,723 and 15/284,950), licensed to Fennec Pharmaceuticals, on the administration of a thiol-based chemoprotectant compound, and holding patents (U.S. patent numbers, 7,022,315; 1328253; 60118172; and 2001253919), licensed to Fennec Pharmaceuticals, on the administration of a thiol-based chemoprotectant compound; he has divested himself of all financial interest regarding these patents. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
We thank Lesley Muldoon, Nancy Doolittle, and Kristy Knight for nonclinical work on sodium thiosulfate and for clinical phase 1 and 2 trials with carboplatin, which led to the current phase 3 trial with cisplatin, and for initiating and sustaining the ongoing collaboration that made this trial possible; Alejandra Bosio of Consorzio Interuniversitario (CINECA); Anna Grier and Steve Baker of the Birmingham Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit; Stephanie François from Besançon, France, and Daniele Pariente, radiology reviewer for the French patients; the International Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL) 6 independent data and safety monitoring committee (Maarten Egeler [Toronto], Deborah Ashby [London], and Stefan Bielack [Stuttgart, Germany]); the staff, lead investigators (see the Supplementary Appendix), collaborators, and clinical research assistants at all the trial centers; and most particularly, all the families who participated in this trial.
Footnotes
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allan BJ, Parikh PP, Diaz S, Perez EA, Neville HL, Sola JE. Predictors of survival and incidence of hepatoblastoma in the paediatric population. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15:741–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Roebuck DJ, Aronson D, Clapuyt P, et al. 2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:123–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown J, Perilongo G, Shafford E, et al. Pretreatment prognostic factors for children with hepatoblastoma — results from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL 1. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1418–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maibach R, Roebuck D, Brugieres L, et al. Prognostic stratification for children with hepatoblastoma: the SIOPEL experience. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1543–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Perilongo G, Maibach R, Shafford E, et al. Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus doxorubicin for standard-risk hepatoblastoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1662–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knight KR, Kraemer DF, Neuwelt EA. Ototoxicity in children receiving platinum chemotherapy: underestimating a commonly occurring toxicity that may influence academic and social development. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8588–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stelmachowicz PG, Hoover BM, Lewis DE, Kortekaas RW, Pittman AL. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normalhearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:902–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gurney JG, Tersak JM, Ness KK, Landier W, Matthay KK, Schmidt ML. Hearing loss, quality of life, and academic problems in long-term neuroblastoma survivors: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatrics 2007;120(5): e1229–e1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boothroyd A Developmental factors in speech recognition. Int Audiol 1970;9: 30–8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brock PR, Bellman SC, Yeomans EC, Pinkerton CR, Pritchard J. Cisplatin ototoxicity in children: a practical grading system. Med Pediatr Oncol 1991;19:295–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knight KR, Chen L, Freyer D, et al. Group-wide, prospective study of ototoxicity assessment in children receiving cis-platin chemotherapy (ACCL05C1): a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:440–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brock PR, Brugieres L, Perilongo G, et al. Cisplatin ototoxicity in children with hepatoblastoma: can it be reduced? Results from the SIOPEL strategy group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;47:362 abstract. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Howell SB, Pfeifle CL, Wung WE, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin with systemic thiosulfate protection. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97:845–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pfeifle CE, Howell SB, Felthouse RD, et al. High-dose cisplatin with sodium thiosulfate protection. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3:237–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goel R, Cleary SM, Horton C, et al. Effect of sodium thiosulfate on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of cisplatin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1552–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neuwelt EA, Brummett RE, Doolittle ND, et al. First evidence of otoprotection against carboplatin-induced hearing loss with a two-compartment system in patients with central nervous system malignancy using sodium thiosulfate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998;286:77–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blakley BW, Cohen JI, Doolittle ND, et al. Strategies for prevention of toxicity caused by platinum-based chemotherapy: review and summary of the annual meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Program, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, March 10, 2001. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1997– 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Muldoon LL, Pagel MA, Kroll RA, et al. Delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate in animal models reduces platinum ototoxicity without reduction of antitumor activity. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:309–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muldoon LL, Walker-Rosenfeld SL, Hale C, Purcell SE, Bennett LC, Neuwelt EA. Rescue from enhanced alkylator-induced cell death with low molecular weight sulfur-containing chemoprotectants. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;296:797–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Doolittle ND, Muldoon LL, Brummett RE, et al. Delayed sodium thiosulfate as an otoprotectant against carboplatin-induced hearing loss in patients with malignant brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:493– 500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neuwelt EA, Pagel MA, Kraemer DF, Peterson DR, Muldoon LL. Bone marrow chemoprotection without compromise of chemotherapy efficacy in a rat brain tumor model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;309: 594–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Doolittle ND, Muldoon LL, Culp AY, Neuwelt EA. Delivery of chemotherapeutics across the blood-brain barrier: challenges and advances. Adv Pharmacol 2014; 71:203–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harned TM, Kalous O, Neuwelt A, et al. Sodium thiosulfate administered six hours after cisplatin does not compromise antineuroblastoma activity. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:533–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Erdlenbruch B, Nier M, Kern W, Hiddemann W, Pekrun A, Lakomek M. Pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and relation to nephrotoxicity in paediatric patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001;57:393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brock PR, Knight KR, Freyer DR, et al. Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston ototoxicity scale. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2408–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brock PR, Koliouskas DE, Barratt TM, Yeomans E, Pritchard J. Partial reversibility of cisplatin nephrotoxicity in children. J Pediatr 1991;118:531–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Delanaye P, Ebert N, Melsom T, et al. Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 1: How to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol? Clin Kidney J 2016;9:682–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Otte JB, Pritchard J, Aronson DC, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL-1 and review of the world experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004;42:74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Czauderna P, Otte JB, Aronson DC, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of hepatoblastoma in the modern era — recommendations from the Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOPEL). Eur J Cancer 2005;41:1031–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cooper BW, Veal GJ, Radivoyevitch T, et al. A phase I and pharmacodynamic study of fludarabine, carboplatin, and topo-tecan in patients with relapsed, refractory, or high-risk acute leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6830–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jarvis IWH, Meczes EL, Thomas HD, et al. Therapy-induced carboplatin-DNA adduct levels in human ovarian tumours in relation to assessment of adduct measurement in mouse tissues. Biochem Pharmacol 2012;83:69–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.O’Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zsiros J, Brugieres L, Brock P, et al. Dose-dense cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery for children with high-risk hepatoblastoma (SIOPEL-4): a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:834–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Freyer DR, Chen L, Krailo MD, et al. Effects of sodium thiosulfate versus observation on development of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children with cancer (ACCL0431): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:63–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bouffet E Reducing cisplatin ototoxicity in children: some hope and many questions. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:6–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Neuwelt EA, Gilmer-Knight K, Lacy C, et al. Toxicity profile of delayed high dose sodium thiosulfate in children treated with carboplatin in conjunction with blood-brain-barrier disruption. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;47:174–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brock PR, Yeomans EC, Bellman SC, Pritchard J. Cisplatin therapy in infants: short and long-term morbidity. Br J Cancer Suppl 1992;18:S36–S40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoebers FJ, Pluim D, Verheij M, et al. Prediction of treatment outcome by cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in patients with stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treated by concurrent cis-platin-radiation (RADPLAT). Int J Cancer 2006;119:750–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoebers FJ, Pluim D, Hart AAM, et al. Cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemo-radiation: lack of correlation between normal tissues and primary tumor. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008;61:1075–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Breglio AM, Rusheen AE, Shide ED, et al. Cisplatin is retained in the cochlea indefinitely following chemotherapy. Nat Commun 2017;8:1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.